Changes In Care Use Research Articles

Medical visits and mortality among dementia patients during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to rates predicted from 2019

BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) were especially vulnerable, and modes of medical care delivery shifted rapidly. This study assessed the impact of the pandemic on care for people with ADRD, examining the use of primary, emergency, and long-term care, as well as deaths due to COVID and to other causes.MethodsAmong 4.2 million beneficiaries aged 66 and older with ADRD in traditional Medicare, monthly deaths and claims for routine care (doctors’ office and telehealth visits), inpatient/emergency department (ED) visits, and long-term care facility use from March or June 2020 through December 2022 are compared to monthly rates predicted from January–December 2019 using OLS and logistic/negative binomial regression. Correlation analyses examine the association between excess deaths — due to COVID and non-COVID causes — and changes in care use in the beneficiary’s state of residence.ResultsIncreased telehealth visits more than offset reduced office visits, with primary care visits increasing overall (by 9 percent from June 2020 onward relative to the predicted rate from 2019, p < .001). Emergency/inpatient visits declined (by 9 percent, p < .001) and long-term care facility use declined, remaining 14% below the 2019 trend from June 2020 onward (p < .001). Both COVID and non-COVID deaths rose, with 231,000 excess deaths (16% above the prediction from 2019), over 80 percent of which were attributable to COVID. Excess deaths were higher among women, non-White patients, those in rural and isolated zip codes, and those with higher social deprivation index scores. States with the largest increases in primary care visits had the lowest excess deaths (correlation -0.49).ConclusionsOlder adults with ADRD had substantial deaths above pre-pandemic projections during the COVID-19 pandemic, 80 percent of which were attributed to COVID-19. Routine care increased overall due to a dramatic increase in telehealth visits, but this was uneven across states, and mortality rates were significantly lower in states with higher than pre-pandemic visits.

Changes in Care Use and Financial Status Associated With Dementia in Older Adults

Estimating the effects of dementia on care use and financial outcomes is timely, as the population with dementia will more than double in the next few decades. To determine the incremental changes associated with dementia in regard to older adults' care use and assess financial consequences for individuals, families, and society. This population-based cohort study included propensity score matching on national, longitudinal data using extensive baseline variables of sociodemographic characteristics, economic status, family availability, health conditions, disability status, and outpatient care use among 2 groups of US adults aged 55 years or older who did not have dementia. In total, 2387 adults experienced the onset of dementia during the 2-year follow-up (dementia group) and 2387 adults did not (control group). Participants were followed up for 8 years from the baseline. Data were analyzed from February 2021 to August 2023. Dementia determined based on Langa-Weir classification. Outcomes of care use included monthly care hours from family and unpaid helpers, in-home medical services, hospital stay, and nursing facility stay. Financial outcomes included out-of-pocket medical costs, wealth, and the status of having Medicaid. Among the full sample, the mean (SD) age was 75.4 [10.4] years, and 59.7% of participants were female. Care use was similar at baseline between the matched groups but was substantially greater for the dementia group vs control group in subsequent years, especially during the 2-year follow-up: 45 vs 13 monthly care hours from family and unpaid helpers, 548 of 2370 participants (23.1%) vs 342 of 2383 (14.4%) using in-home medical care, 1104 of 2369 (46.6%) vs 821 of 2377 (34.5%) with hospital stay, and 489 of 2375 (20.6%) vs 104 of 2384 (4.4%) using a nursing facility. The increase in use of a nursing facility was especially high if baseline family care availability was low. Over the 8-year follow-up in the dementia group, the 2-year out-of-pocket medical costs increased from $4005 to $10 006, median wealth was reduced from $79 339 to $30 490, and those enrolling in Medicaid increased from 379 of 2358 participants (16.1%) to 201 of 676 participants (29.7%). No statistically significant changes in financial outcomes were found in the control group. This cohort study demonstrated that the incremental changes associated with dementia in regard to older adults' long-term care and financial burden are substantial. Family care availability should be accounted for in a comprehensive assessment of predicting the effects of dementia.

The clinically extremely vulnerable to COVID: Identification and changes in healthcare while self-isolating (shielding) during the coronavirus pandemic.

ObjectiveIn March 2020, Scottish government identified people clinically extremely vulnerable to COVID due to pre-existing health conditions. These people were advised to strictly self-isolate (shield) at home. We examined who was identified as clinically extremely vulnerable, how their healthcare changed during isolation, and whether this process exacerbated healthcare inequalities.&#x0D; ApproachWe linked all individuals on the shielding register in NHS Grampian to their in-patient and out-patient healthcare records from 2015 through 2020. We analysed the method of patients’ identification as clinically extremely vulnerable (via an algorithmic NHS record scan or designated ad hoc by their care-providers). We measured out-patient, in-patient, and emergency healthcare attendances, and compared use rates between two 3-month periods before and during the first strict isolation period. We evaluated changes in care use between those shielding and the general non-shielding population, and differences between shielding sub-populations (by clinical reason for shielding, age, sex, and socio-economic deprivation).&#x0D; ResultsThe shielding register included 16,092 people (3% of the population). 42% of people on the register were not identified by national healthcare record screening, including the majority of cancer and immunocompromised patients. People added to the register by their care-providers were more likely to be young and less economically-deprived.&#x0D; Shielders’ healthcare use decreased during isolation (rate compared to pre-isolation: 0.65 out-patient, 0.54 scheduled in-patient; 0.75 emergency in-patient; 0.71 A&amp;E). However, people shielding had better maintained care than the non-shielding population (e.g. RR 2.9 for scheduled in-patient care). There were inequalities in whose scheduled care was maintained while shielding: younger people and those with cancer had significantly higher visit rates. However, there were no differences in care-preservation between men and women or between socioeconomic deprivation levels.&#x0D; ConclusionsThe reliance on emergency care while shielding indicates that, overall, continuity of care for existing conditions was not optimal. However, there was notable success in maintaining care for cancer. We suggest that integrating demographic and primary care data would improve identification of the clinically vulnerable and help equitably prioritise care.

Did the COVID-19 pandemic change the care situation of older adults?

The study examined changes in giving and receiving care by community-dwelling older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 compared to a period about two years before. Using data collected in two waves by the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (N = 1013), we study how many and which older adults report a change in care use and provision and how these changes impact on psychological well-being. The results show that only for a small part of the sample changes occurred. The large majority provides no care (73%) or uses no care (62%) in both waves. 7% stayed a care provider during the pandemic, where 15% quitted care provision and 5% started care provision. 17% remained a care user, where 15% did not receive care anymore and 6% started to use care. The informal carers mainly consisted of women and younger elderly in good health and the care recipients were mainly women and older elderly in poorer health. Using care had a negative impact on psychological well-being, but providing care was not related to wellbeing during the pandemic. The results imply that the pandemic and the measures taken affected the care situation of only a small part of the older adults.

Consumer-Directed Health Care: Early Evidence About Effects On Cost And Quality

Demand for consumer-directed health care (CDHC) is growing among purchasers of care, and early evidence about its effects is beginning to emerge. Studies to date are consistent with effects predicted by earlier literature: There is evidence of modest favorable health selection and early reports that consumer-directed plans are associated with both lower costs and lower cost increases. The early effects of CDHC on quality are mixed, with evidence of both appropriate and inappropriate changes in care use. Greater information about prices, quality, and treatment choices will be critical if CDHC is to achieve its goals.

National Health Insurance and the antenatal care use: a case in Taiwan

Many studies have found evidence for the importance of antenatal care on pregnancy outcomes. This paper focuses on the determinants of antenatal care use in Taiwan and provides a comparison of access to care before and after National Health Insurance (NHI) was implemented in 1995. A negative binomial model is applied to data from the 1989 and 1996 Taiwan Maternal and Infant Health Surveys to analyze antenatal care use. The results show that women in some situations had more antenatal care visits than average regardless of NHI implementation. These situations include: having a highly educated husband; gaining more weight than average during pregnancy; experiencing a first pregnancy; carrying twins or triplets; having care provided by a doctor rather than other caregivers; and switching to another health care facility during pregnancy. Regarding societal change, the trend toward delaying pregnancy is causing a change in care use. Additionally, three changes in care patterns after NHI are noteworthy. First, antenatal care visits at maternity clinics increased more than visits at hospitals. Second, before NHI's implementation, women who did blue-collar work or farm work sought care more frequently than housewives, but after NHI began government employees and businesswomen sought care more frequently. Third, antenatal care visits of mothers living in Taiwan's central area increased more than visits of those in the northern area. The expansion of medical care in aboriginal areas and outlying islands may prove to be one of NHI's best achievements.