Change In Operative Plan Research Articles

Impact of Intraoperative Decision-Making on Pathological Margin Status in Patients Undergoing Pelvic Exenteration for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer.

A key component of preoperative preparation for pelvic exenteration surgery is the development of an operative plan in a multidisciplinary setting based on the extent of local tumor invasion on preoperative imaging. Changes to the extent of resection or operative plan may occur intraoperatively based on intraoperative findings. To report the frequency and extent of intraoperative deviation from the planned extent of resection during pelvic exenteration for locally recurrent rectal cancer and determine whether this resulted in a more or less radical resection. Retrospective observational study. A high-volume pelvic exenteration center. Patients who underwent pelvic exenteration for locally recurrent rectal cancer between January 2015 and December 2020. Frequency and extent of intraoperative deviation from the planned extent of resection, R0 resection rate. One hundred thirty-six patients underwent pelvic exenteration for locally recurrent rectal cancer, of whom 110 (81%) had R0 resection margins. Twelve patients were excluded because of missing information, and 49 patients (40%) had a change to the operative plan. Operative changes were major in 30 patients (61%), more radical in 40 patients (82%), and margin relevant in 24 patients (49%). In patients in whom there was a change to the operative plan and R0 resection was achieved, the median distance to a relevant margin was 2.5 mm (range, 0.1-10 mm). Of 8 patients with a change in operative plan and R1 resection, 3 were margin relevant, of whom all were considered major, and 2 were more radical and 1 was less radical. Generalizability outside of specialist units may be limited. Intraoperative changes to the planned extent of resection occur commonly and most often result in an unanticipated major or more radical resection. Such changes may contribute to high rates of R0 resection margins in specialist pelvic exenteration units that use an ultraradical approach in these patients. See Video Abstract . ANTECEDENTES:Un componente clave de la preparación preoperatoria para exenteración pélvica es el desarrollo de un plan quirúrgico en un entorno multidisciplinario, basado en el grado de invasión tumoral local en las imágenes preoperatorias. Es posible que se produzcan cambios intraoperatorios en la extensión de la resección o en el plan quirúrgico según los hallazgos intraoperatorios.OBJETIVO:Informar la frecuencia y la extensión de la desviación intraoperatoria de la extensión planificada de la resección durante la exenteración pélvica para el cáncer de recto localmente recurrente, y si esto resultó en una resección más o menos radical.DISEÑO:Estudio observacional retrospectivo.ESCENARIO:Un centro de exenteración pélvica de alto volumen.PACIENTES:Pacientes sometidos a exenteración pélvica por cáncer de recto localmente recurrente entre enero de 2015 y diciembre de 2020.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Frecuencia y extensión de desviación intraoperatoria de la extensión planeada de resección, tasa de resección R0.RESULTADOS:136 pacientes fueron sometidos a exenteración pélvica por cáncer de recto localmente recurrente, de los cuales 110 (81%) tuvieron márgenes de resección R0. 12 pacientes fueron excluidos por falta de información y 49 pacientes (40%) tuvieron un cambio en el plan quirúrgico. Los cambios operatorios fueron mayores en 30 pacientes (61%), más radicales en 40 pacientes (82%) y con relevancia sobre márgenes en 24 pacientes (49%). En los pacientes en los que hubo un cambio en el plan quirúrgico y se logró la resección R0, la distancia mediana hasta un margen relevante fue de 2.5 mm (rango 0.1-10 mm). De ocho pacientes con un cambio en el plan quirúrgico y resección R1, tres tuvieron relevancia sobre márgenes de los cuales todos se consideraron mayores, dos fueron más radicales y uno fue menos radical.LIMITACIONES:La generalización fuera de las unidades especializadas puede ser limitada.CONCLUSIONES:Los cambios intraoperatorios en la extensión planificada de la resección ocurren comúnmente y con mayor frecuencia resultan en una resección mayor imprevista y más radical. Dichos cambios pueden contribuir a altas tasas de márgenes de resección R0 en unidades especializadas en EP que emplean un enfoque ultrarradical en estos pacientes. (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco ).

Limited disease progression in endocrine surgery patients with treatment delays due to COVID-19

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted the delivery of care and timing of elective surgical procedures. Most endocrine-related operations were considered elective and safe to postpone, providing a unique opportunity to assess clinical outcomes under protracted treatment plans.MethodsAmerican Association of Endocrine Surgeon members were surveyed for participation. A REDCap survey was developed and distributed to 27 institutions to assess the impact of COVID-19-related delays. Information collected included patient demographics, primary diagnosis, resumption of care, and assessment of disease progression by the surgeon.ResultsTwelve out of 27 institutions completed the survey (44.4%). Of 850 patients, 74.8% (636) were female; median age was 56 (IQR 44-66) years. 4.0% (34) of patients, had not been seen since their original surgical appointment was delayed. 86.2% (733) of patients had a delay in care with women more likely to have a delay (87.6% vs. 82.2% of men, =3.84, p=0.05). Median length of delay was 70 (IQR 42-118) days. Among patients with a delay in care, primary disease site included thyroid (54.2%), parathyroid (37.2%), adrenal (6.5%), and pancreatic/GI neuroendocrine tumors (1.3%). 4.0% (26) of patients experienced disease progression and 4.1% (24) had a change from the initial operative plan. Length of delay was not associated with disease progression (p=0.96) or a change in operative plan (p=0.66).ConclusionWhile some patients experienced disease progression during COVID-19 delays to endocrine disease-related care, most patients with follow-up did not. Our analysis indicates that temporary delay may be an acceptable course of action in extreme circumstances for most endocrine-related surgical disease.

Effect of 3-Dimensional, Virtual Reality Models for Surgical Planning of Robotic Prostatectomy on Trifecta Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Planning complex operations such as robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy requires surgeons to review 2-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cross-sectional images to understand 3-dimensional (3D), patient-specific anatomy. We sought to determine surgical outcomes for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy when surgeons reviewed 3D, virtual reality (VR) models for operative planning. A multicenter, randomized, single-blind clinical trial was conducted from January 2019 to December 2020. Patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were prospectively enrolled and randomized to either a control group undergoing usual preoperative planning with prostate biopsy results and MRI only or to an intervention group where MRI and biopsy results were supplemented with a 3D VR model. The primary outcome measure was margin status, and secondary outcomes were oncologic control, sexual function and urinary function. Ninety-two patients were analyzed, with trends toward lower positive margin rates (33% vs 25%) in the intervention group, no significant difference in functional outcomes and no difference in traditional operative metrics (p >0.05). Detectable postoperative prostate specific antigen was significantly lower in the intervention group (31% vs 9%, p=0.036). In 32% of intervention cases, the surgeons modified their operative plan based on the model. When this subset was compared to the control group, there was a strong trend toward increased bilateral nerve sparing (78% vs 92%), and a significantly lower rate of postoperative detectable prostate specific antigen in the intervention subset (31% vs 0%, p=0.038). This randomized clinical trial demonstrated patients whose surgical planning involved 3D VR models have better oncologic outcomes while maintaining functional outcomes.

Preoperative Angiography for Free Fibula Flap Harvest: A Case Series.

To assess if preoperative angiography of the lower extremity is necessary to detect abnormalities that alter operative planning of a free fibula flap (FFF). The secondary objective is to determine whether abnormalities are identified on physical examination. A retrospective case series of patients receiving preoperative lower extremity angiography for FFF was performed. Between November 2004 and July 2016, patients assessed for FFF reconstruction by a single surgeon were reviewed. Outcomes analyzed were preoperative physical examination, angiography findings, changes in operative plan, and perioperative complications including flap failure and limb ischemia. Level of agreement between physical examination and angiography findings was analyzed. A total of 132 consecutive patients were assessed for FFF, of which 70 met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 60.9 (range: 22-88) years old. All patients underwent aortic angiogram runoff, except for 2 who received computed tomography angiography. The surgical plan was altered based on angiography findings in 9 (12.9%) patients, and 7 (77.8%) of these cases had a normal physical examination. A further 6 (8.6%) patients had physical examination findings precluding the use of FFF, whereas imaging demonstrated the contrary. Physical examination demonstrated low predictability of aberrant vascular anatomy, with a sensitivity of 22.2%. There were no limb ischemia complications. Routine preoperative angiography of the lower extremity for all patients being evaluated for FFF is important to ensure safety and success of the procedure. Physical examination alone is insufficient to detect vascular abnormalities that may result in limb or flap compromise.

Incidental Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) and Bariatric Surgery: A Review.

The number of bariatric procedures has increased notably, with incidental findings such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) being observed in 2%. The number of studies dealing with incidental findings during bariatric surgery (BS), especially GISTs, is scarce. This review aims to summarize the evidence about GIST diagnosis during BS, and to establish recommendations for the management and follow-up of these patients. A systematic literature search from January 2000 to March 2020 was performed. Retrospective cohort studies, case series, case reports, reviews, and conference abstracts were considered eligible. The present systematic review focused on a descriptive analysis of the data included in the articles selected. The calculated incidence was 0.65%. A change in operative plan was observed in 5% of the cases. In 98% of the cases, GISTs were gastric, with a mean size of 10.3mm. The mitotic index was < 5 in 99%. Accordingly, all patients were classified as having a very low or low risk of recurrence. R0 resection was achieved in 100% of cases. The incidence of GISTs in patients with MO submitted to BS is considerably higher than in the general population. The diagnosis is related to the depth of preoperative work, the exhaustiveness of the intraoperative examination, and the meticulousness of the histopathological analysis. Although GISTs have a low risk of recurrence and it was previously unnecessary to modify the surgical technique, we recommend that bariatric surgeons are aware of the diagnosis and management of incidental GISTs.

The use of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography to assess anastomotic perfusion following bowel resection in surgery for gynecologic malignancies - A report of 100 consecutive anastomoses

ObjectiveReal-time intraoperative assessment of anastomotic perfusion with indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) is a recent technique that is found to assist intraoperative decision-making and decrease risk of anastomotic leak in the General Surgery literature. No studies to date evaluate its use in Gynecologic Oncology. Our objectives were to assess the safety and feasibility of ICG-FA use and to describe the intraoperative assessment of anastomotic perfusion with ICG-FA. MethodsA retrospective study of a prospectively-collected database of patients with a gynecologic malignancy who underwent a bowel resection at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, Canada, between November 1, 2017 and December 15, 2019 was conducted. ICG-FA was administered intravenously, and a near infrared imaging system (Pinpoint, Novadaq, Canada; SPY-PHI, Stryker, USA) was used to objectively assess bowel perfusion. ResultsICG-FA was used to assess a total of 100 bowel anastomoses in 82 consecutive surgeries: 56 low anterior resections, 19 small bowel resections, 15 right hemi-colectomies, 6 left hemi-colectomies, 3 transverse colectomies, and 1 total colectomy. Fifty-five end-to end, 44 side-to-side and 1 end-to-side anastomoses were assessed. ICG angiography was successful in all patients, allowing complete visualization of anastomotic perfusion in all cases. Hypoperfusion detected by ICG-FA resulted in change in operative plan for three patients (two anastomotic revisions and one diverting ileostomy). There were no adverse reactions to ICG. In this cohort, there was one postoperative anastomotic leak. ConclusionsICG-FA enables objective and accurate intraoperative evaluation of anastomotic perfusion in surgeries for gynecologic malignancies. Its implementation and routine use were found to be safe and well-tolerated without side effects in our study cohort. ICG-FA can be used with other risk-assessment strategies to guide operative decision-making in Gynecologic Oncology.

Surgical Planning of Hepatic Metastasectomy Using Radiologist-Performed Intraoperative Ultrasound

Background: Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) of the liver is a useful adjunct for surgical planning during hepatic metastasectomy. This study aims to (1) report the frequency of change in operative plan as a result of IOUS findings and (2) determine whether IOUS is still beneficial after implementing a standardized, comprehensive process of preoperative hepatic imaging. Methods: First, a retrospective review of all patients undergoing hepatic metastasectomy at a single institution was conducted to identify how frequently IOUS findings altered the surgical plan. Second, a prospective study was conducted where patients underwent both preoperative CT and MRI within 30 days before surgery to determine if IOUS may still have benefit despite the implementation of a standardized preoperative imaging protocol. Results: In the retrospective review, 39 liver resections were completed; 100% and 36% of patients underwent preoperative CT and MRI, respectively. The mean time between preoperative imaging and surgery was 46 days (7-126). Operative plans were changed in 10/39 (26%) cases based on IOUS. After the standardization of preoperative imaging, 27 liver resections were performed. All patients underwent preoperative CT and MRI; the mean time between preoperative imaging and surgery was 20 days (1-98) (p=0.001). The operative plan was amended in 5/27 (19%) cases based on IOUS (χ 2=1.405, p=0.24). Conclusion: Even after standardizing the quality and timing of preoperative imaging, the operative plan was changed in nearly 1/5 patients due to IOUS. These findings demonstrate the utility of IOUS in surgical planning for hepatic metastasectomy and provide the basis for a quality improvement strategy regarding standardized preoperative imaging.

Intraoperative Radiographic Assessment of Bone Resection Margins During Mandibulectomy: A Case Series

Mandibulectomy remains the treatment of choice for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma with infiltration of bone and for benign tumors with full mandibular thickness involvement. Although bone resection margins are critical for patient outcomes, intraoperative immediate bone margins assessment is inadequate, and few alternative options have been described. The purpose of this study was to describe the use of an existing intraoperative radiographic system for objective determination of bone resection margins during mandibulectomy. We conducted a retrospective case series of all patients at the Greater Baltimore Medical Center who underwent mandibulectomy and received intraoperative Faxitron radiography from January 1, 2016, to March 1, 2019. Patient characteristics including age, sex, diagnosis, tumor location, clinical and pathologic stage, procedure performed, and bone resection margins were reviewed. A total of 10 patients underwent mandibulectomy with intraoperative radiography. Nine (90%) received surgery for squamous cell carcinoma, with 1 (10%) for ameloblastoma. Out of those with squamous cell carcinoma, tumor location varied, and all were clinically stage T4. Final pathologic margins were negative in all cases (10/10), though in 2 cases, close margins were assessed intraoperatively, leading to further resection or change in operative plan. Intraoperative radiographic assessment of bone resection margins is a promising technique, though further validation is required.

Postanesthesia ultrasound facilitates creation of more preferred accesses without affecting access survival

ObjectiveThe results of preoperative ultrasound (pre-US) vein mapping for hemodialysis access creation can be affected by environmental and clinical factors, such as ambient temperature, acute illness, recent phlebotomy, and hypovolemia. These factors may inadvertently exclude otherwise viable veins as options for access creation. We hypothesized that repeating the ultrasound vein mapping immediately preoperatively after anesthesia administration (post-US) identifies additional veins not appreciated by pre-US, thereby altering the operative plan and producing more preferred accesses, particularly more forearm accesses. MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of patients (N = 323) at one institution who underwent pre-US followed by creation of a permanent dialysis access (fistula or graft) between January 2008 and December 2013. By applying the Silva criteria to pre-US vein mapping reports, a preoperative surgical plan was established. There were 99 patients who underwent only pre-US (group I); an additional post-US was performed in 224 patients (group II). Using multivariable logistic regression, we tested the association of post-US (group II) with pre-US alone (group I) with a change in operative plan and placement of a more preferred access (ie, more distal and autogenous). We also analyzed access survival using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression and determined maturation rates for accesses in groups I and II. ResultsIn group II, there were more changes in operative plan after controlling for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio, 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-3.25), and more preferred accesses were created (adjusted odds ratio, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-3.27). In addition, more autogenous accesses were created in group II when initially only upper arm graft options had been identified (P = .01); overall, more forearm accesses were created in group II (P = .03). There was no significant difference in access maturation and patency in comparing accesses in group I and group II, despite creation of autogenous accesses in group II that are usually associated with higher rates of access failure. In fact, forearm radial-cephalic autogenous accesses created in group II had secondary patency rates of 91% at 2 years. ConclusionsOur study supports the hypothesis that the use of post-US in addition to pre-US leads to placement of more preferred accesses while maintaining maturation and patency rates. Ultrasound evaluation after anesthesia should be considered a step in the process of care for hemodialysis access creation to improve outcomes.

Abstract P4-02-12: Breast MRI: Enhancing pre-operative planning in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer

Abstract Hypothesis: Preoperative breast MRIs in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients may lead to additional findings, including larger disease involvement, thus leading to a change in the operative plan. This information can led to better surgical planning and decreased rates of surgical re-excisions. Methods: This was a single surgeon, single institution, retrospective analysis of women with newly-diagnosed breast cancer who had surgery between December 2013 and December 2014. A total of ninety-six patients underwent preoperative breast MRI. Exclusion criteria were patient's refusal of MRI or surgery, contraindication to MRI based on implants or body habitus, and male patients. Results: Overall, breast MRI most closely correlated to pathological tumor size (gold standard). MRI had a 64% correlation with pathology size, whereas mammography and ultrasound correlation were 44% and 43% respectively. As breast density increased, MRI correlation to pathologic tumor size improved. For breast density between 25-50%, tumor size by MRI correlated with pathology size in 27% of patients, mammogram correlation was 33% and ultrasound was 12%. When breast density increased to 51-75%, MRI correlation improved to 92%, whereas mammogram correlation was 56% and ultrasound was 68%. The majority of patients fell within these two density categories; correlation for breast density &amp;lt;25% and &amp;gt;75% were not statistically significant. Of the breast biopsies preformed for MRI abnormalities not otherwise identified by mammography or ultrasound, 42% were positive for invasive cancer or DCIS. Thirty-eight percent of patients had a change in operative plan based on their MRI findings. Of the ninety-six patients, nine were changed from breast conserving surgery to mastectomy, and 29 underwent a larger area of resection than planned prior to MRI, due to findings of more extensive disease on MRI not otherwise appreciated by mammography or ultrasound. Conclusion: Pre-operative MRI played a significant role in the pre-surgical evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. In our series, breast MRI demonstrated better correlation with extent of disease compared to other imaging modalities. This is turn enhanced patient and surgeon decision making and led to more precise pre-operative surgical planning. Citation Format: Carr B, Lamb LC, Zarfos K, Weigert J, Singh R. Breast MRI: Enhancing pre-operative planning in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-02-12.

Effect of brachial plexus block-driven vascular access planning on primary distal arteriovenous fistula recruitment and outcomes

Hemodialysis vascular accesses (VAs) are traditionally planned based on the nondominant upper extremity preoperative physical and sonographic vascular findings. Clinical guidelines advocate the use of the most suitably distended vein in the most distal location. Brachial plexus block (BPB), through its sympathectomy-like effect, promotes vasodilation and can thus further optimize vein recruitment and operative strategy. However, studies on its role in driving primary distal autogenous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) placement are limited. We therefore evaluated a traditional approach of clinic-based VA planning against an on-table sonography-guided strategy under BPB. This was a prospective observational study involving 110 consecutive end-stage renal disease multiethnic Asian patients referred for primary VA creation under BPB after preoperative venous mapping. Cases were grouped according to whether there was a preset operative plan for radial cephalic (RC) or brachial cephalic (BC) AVF creation based on artery and vein >2mm and >2.5mm size criteria respectively (group A) or vein size or length were suboptimal (2-2.5mm and<5cm respectively), thus precluding any operative plan till after BPB (group B). Group B also included cases with a preset VA plan but that subsequently underwent an on-table change in operative plan as a result of more favorable distal vein dilation post-BPB. RC AVF recruitment, maturation, and patency rates were compared in the two groups over a 1-year follow up. One hundred RC and BC AVF were available for analysis after excluding brachial AVFs and grafts: 41 in group A and 59 in group B. Twenty one (51%) primary RC AVFs were created according to a preset preoperative plan compared with 37 (63%) based upon on-table planning or plan modification (P > .05). Satisfactory post-BPB forearm vasodilation resulted in 44% of 36 plans for BC being changed to RC AVFs. RC AVF 6-week hemodynamic maturation and 3-month functional maturation in group A vs B were 48% vs 60% and 69% vs 57%, respectively (P > .05). One-year primary and secondary patency rates were 57% vs 50% and 73% vs 87%, respectively (log rank >.05). Outcomes of RC AVFs in group B were not inferior to those of BC AVFs. On-table BPB-driven VA planning and plan modification strategy contribute to considerable AVF recruitment but do not lead to significantly better distal AVF prevalence or outcomes over the traditional approach. An adequately powered randomized controlled study is, however, warranted to better assess the long-term clinical and cost benefits of such a strategy.

Systematic review of the use of pre-operative simulation and navigation for hepatectomy: current status and future perspectives.

Pre-operative simulation using three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions have been suggested to enhance surgical planning of hepatectomy. Evidence on its benefits for hepatectomy patients remains limited. This systematic review examined the use and impact of pre-operative simulation and intraoperative navigation on hepatectomy outcomes. A systematical searched electronic databases for studies reporting on the use and results of simulation and navigation for hepatectomy was performed. The primary outcome was change in operative plan based on simulation. Secondary outcomes included operating time (min), estimated blood loss, surgical margins, 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality, and study-specific outcomes. From 222 citations, we included 11 studies including 497 patients. All were observational cohort studies. No study compared hepatectomy with and without simulation. All studies performed 3D reconstruction and segmentation, most commonly with volumetrics measurements. In six studies reporting intraoperative navigation, five relied on ultrasound, and one on a resection map. Of two studies reporting on it, the resection line was changed intraoperatively in one third of patients, based on simulation. Virtually predicted liver volumes (Pearson correlation r = 0.917 to 0.995) and surgical margins (r = 0.84 to 0.967) correlated highly with actual ones in eight studies. Heterogeneity of the included studies precluded meta-analysis. Pre-operative simulation seems accurate in measuring volumetrics and surgical margins. Current studies lack intraoperative transposition of simulation for direct navigation. Simulation appears useful planning of hepatectomies, but further work is warranted focusing on the development of improved tools and appraisal of their clinical impact compared to traditional resection.

Effectiveness of a Radiofrequency Detection System as an Adjunct to Manual Counting Protocols for Tracking Surgical Sponges: A Prospective Trial of 2,285 Patients

Despite rigorous manual counting protocols and the classification of retained surgical items (RSIs) as potential "never events," RSIs continue to occur in approximately 1 per 1,000 to 18,000 operations. This study's goals were to evaluate the incorporation of a radiofrequency detection system (RFDS) into existing laparotomy sponge- and Raytec-counting protocols for the detection of RSIs and define associated risk factors. All patients undergoing surgery at the University of North Carolina Hospitals from September 2009 to August 2010 were enrolled consecutively. The performance of an RFDS-incorporated accounting protocol for detecting RSIs was prospectively evaluated. Several operative metrics were recorded to identify risk factors for miscounts. A total of 2,285 patients were enrolled. One near miss was detected by the RFDS. Thirty-five miscounts occurred, for a rate of 1.53%. The ultimate locations of miscounted items were surgical site (n = 11), within operative suite (n = 10), surgical drapes (n = 2), and emergency protocol deviations (n = 12). Perioperative variables associated with miscounts were higher estimated volume of blood lost, longer operations, higher number of laparotomy sponges used, open surgical approach, "after hours" operations, change of surgical team during operation, weekend or holiday operations, unanticipated changes in operative plan during surgery, and emergency operations. Body mass index was not associated with miscounts. Surveys completed by participating surgical staff suggested high confidence in the RFDS for prevention of RSIs. The incorporation of the RFDS assisted in the resolution of a near-miss event (1 of 2,285) not detected by manual counting protocols and assisted in the resolution of 35 surgical-sponge miscounts. No known RSIs occurred during the study period. Risk factors for miscounts were identified and can help identify at-risk surgical populations.

Radioimmunoguided surgery for patients with liver metastases secondary to colorectal cancer.

Hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer offers a 5-year survival rate of 30%. Selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from excision is challenging. The judgment is made by radiographic techniques preoperatively and by sight and touch and the instinct of the surgeon intraoperatively. Confirmation that all tumor tissue has been excised relies on the appearance and texture of the tissue and is verified by routine histology. The authors' objective was to evaluate (1) the ability of radioimmunoguided surgery (RIGS) to improve the intraoperative detection of metastatic disease, and (2) any change in the operative plan originating from the information gained in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Charts and tumor registry data for patients who underwent planned liver resection for colorectal cancer using the RIGS method from January 1985 to December 1993 were reviewed. This group of patients was compared to a similar group that underwent traditional liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer during the same period. Patients who had the RIGS procedure during the earlier part of the period (1985-1990), were injected with tumor-associated glycoprotein (TAG) antibody B72.3; those in the later period (1990-1993) were injected with the second-generation anti-TAG monoclonal antibody CC49. Both monoclonal antibodies were labeled with sodium iodide I 125. Both traditional and RIGS exploration were used to determine the extent of the malignant process and any change in operative plan. Seventy-four cases of planned liver resection were performed with the RIGS method (group I), and 215 cases were performed with the traditional method (group II). Age and sex distribution were similar in both groups, as were morbidity and mortality, with an overall perioperative mortality of 1%. The distribution and number of metastatic lesions to the liver were the same, although group I included more cases with smaller metastatic lesions and more patients with anatomic resections. No extrahepatic tumor was found in 140 patients (65%) in group II, whereas there were only 21 patients (28%) in group I in whom no extrahepatic disease was detected (P < .001). RIGS exploration identified additional tumor in 12 (16%) of 74 cases: in the gastrohepatic ligament lymph nodes (LN) in five patients, in the celiac axis LN in one patient, and in the periaortic LN in six patients. These discoveries changed the operative plan for all of these patients, avoiding excision in the latter six patients and extending the resection in the other six. RIGS surgery provides an immediate and more accurate intraoperative staging system of patients with colorectal liver metastases than does traditional exploration by identifying additional metastatic disease, mainly to the lymph nodes, thus changing the plan of resection in a significant number of patients. More studies are needed to evaluate any significant survival advantage of patients who undergo removal of all RIGS-positive tissue.