Change In Monthly Migraine Days Research Articles

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Arabic version of HIT-6 questionnaire in patients with migraine indicated for preventive therapy: A multi-center study.

The Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) is an important patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in migraine prevention trials. This study aimed to (i) assess the reliability and validity of the Arabic version of HIT-6 in Arabic-speaking patients experiencing migraine, and (ii) evaluate the responsiveness of HIT-6 following migraine preventive therapy. In this prospective study, patients with migraine (n = 145) were requested to fill out a headache diary, the Arabic version of HIT-6, and Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) at two time points (baseline and 3 months after initiation of prophylactic treatment). Some respondents (n = 73) were requested to fill out HIT-6 again 1 week from the baseline for test-retest reliability. The intensity of migraine headache attacks was evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). An anchor-based method was used to establish the minimal important change (MIC) value and responsiveness of HIT-6. The total scores of HIT-6 were significantly correlated to a fair degree with MIDAS (r = 0.41), as well as VAS (r = 0.53), and monthly migraine days (r = 0.38) at the baseline while at the follow-up (after 3 months), the correlations were of moderate degree with MIDAS scores (r = 0.62) and monthly migraine days (r = 0.60; convergent validity). Reliability estimates of the Arabic HIT-6 were excellent (Cronbach's α = 0.91 at baseline and 0.89 at follow-up). The average measure interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value for the test-retest reliability was 0.96 (95% confidence interval = 0.94-0.98, p < 0.001). The HIT-6 total score is sensitive to change, being significantly reduced after prophylactic treatment compared to before (effect size = 1.5, standardized response mean = 1.3). A reduction from baseline of 4.5 on HIT-6 showed the highest responsiveness to predict improvement with an area under the curve equal to 0.66, sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 45%, and significance at 0.021. Changes in the HIT-6 total score were positively correlated with changes in monthly migraine days (r = 0.40) and VAS scores (r = 0.69) but not with changes in the score of MIDAS (r = 0.07). The Arabic version of HIT-6 is valid, reliable, and sensitive to detect clinical changes following migraine prophylactic treatment with a MIC of 4.5 points.

Yoga for Migraine Prevention: An Ancient Practice with Evidence for Current Use.

The objective of this study is to review the recent literature on yoga for migraine prevention either as adjuvant or standalone therapy. Yoga is one of the most widely used complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) therapies; clinicians should be familiar with yoga practice so that they can best advise interested patients. It is also important to assess study design and types of yoga offered. Using PubMed and Litmaps, research published from 2018 to 2023 addressing yoga and migraine was assessed. Two systematic reviews and six studies have recently been published on yoga as adjunctive migraine preventive treatment. There is class III evidence and a grade B recommendation for yoga as an adjunct migraine preventive treatment. Yoga has been shown to reduce headache frequency, disability, and likely also pain intensity and self-efficacy. Two studies (one in children and one in adults) suggested that yoga as standalone migraine preventive treatment reduces pain intensity, disability, and perceived stress. More research is needed on the long-term efficacy (including change in monthly migraine days specifically in addition to headache frequency) and adherence to yoga practice for the prevention of migraine. In addition, to our knowledge, there is no study evaluating yoga practice in the prodromal or headache phase of migraine as acute treatment.

Continuous combined oral contraceptive use versus vitamin E in the treatment of menstrual migraine: rationale and protocol of a randomized controlled trial (WHAT!)

BackgroundCurrently, there is no evidence-based hormonal treatment for migraine in women. Several small studies suggest a beneficial effect of combined oral contraceptives, but no large randomized controlled trial has been performed. As proof of efficacy is lacking and usage may be accompanied by potentially severe side effects, there is a great need for clarity on this topic.MethodsWomen with menstrual migraine (n = 180) are randomly assigned (1:1) to ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel 30/150 μg or vitamin E 400 IU. Participants start with a baseline period of 4 weeks, which is followed by a 12-week treatment period. During the study period, a E-headache diary will be used, which is time-locked and includes an automated algorithm differentiating headache and migraine days.ResultsThe primary outcome will be change in monthly migraine days (MMD) from baseline (weeks − 4 to 0) to the last 4 weeks of treatment (weeks 9 to 12). Secondary outcomes will be change in monthly headache days (MHD) and 50% responder rates of MMD and MHD.ConclusionsThe WHAT! trial aims to investigate effectivity and safety of continuous combined oral contraceptive treatment for menstrual migraine. Immediate implementation of results in clinical practice is possible.Trial registrationClinical trials.gov NCT04007874. Registered 28 June 2019.

Impact of multiple treatment cycles with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies on migraine course: focus on discontinuation periods. Insights from the multicenter, prospective, I-GRAINE study

Abstract Objectives While a single 12-month treatment cycle (TrC) with anti-CGRP mAbs is not disease-modifying for most patients, there is limited understanding of the effects of multiple TrCs on migraine course. We evaluated whether a second TrC might modify the migraine course by comparing the occurrence of migraine relapse after discontinuation of the second TrC to that following the cessation of the first TrC. Methods In a real-life, multicenter, prospective study we considered all consecutive patients diagnosed with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) or chronic migraine (CM) with &gt; 3 treatment failures and treated with any anti-CGRP mAbs for ≥ 2 consecutive 12-month TrCs who were responders at week 12. The primary endpoint was the change in monthly migraine days (MMD) for HFEM or monthly headache days (MHD) for CM at the first month of treatment discontinuation after the second TrC (D2) compared to the first TrC (D1). Secondary endpoints included variations in monthly analgesic medications (MAM), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) scores, ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, and 100% response rates, and relapse from episodic migraine to CM and from no-medication overuse (MO) to MO at D2 vs. D1. Results One-hundred-seventy-eight patients completed two 12-month TrCs with anti-CGRP mAbs. At D2, patients experienced a significant reduction in MMD (– 0.6, p = 0.028), MHD (– 2.6, p &lt; 0.001), monthly analgesic medications (– 2.0, p &lt; 0.001), and HIT-6 score (– 2.2, p &lt; 0.001) compared to D1, indicating improved effectiveness. The ≥ 50% response rate at weeks 45–48 during the first TrC was 95.5%, while at weeks 45–48 of the second TrC was 99.4%. Corresponding rates at D1 was 20.2% whereas at D2 was 51.6% (p &lt; 0.0001). No statistical difference emerged in ≥ 75% and 100% responders. The relapse rate from episodic migraine to CM at D2 was lower than at D1 (12.3% vs 30.4%; p = 0.0002) Fewer patients experienced relapse from no-MO to MO at D2 compared to D1 (29.5% vs 68.7%; p = 0.00001). Discussion A second TrC with anti-CGRP mAbs demonstrated clinical improvements compared to the first one, as indicated by a milder migraine relapse at D2 compared to D1. Multiple TrCs with anti-CGRP mAbs could progressively modify migraine evolution by reducing CGRP-dependent neuroinflammatory nociceptive inputs to the brain.

Comparative efficacy, quality of life, safety, and tolerability of atogepant and rimegepant in migraine prevention: A matching-adjusted indirect comparison analysis.

Comparative evaluations of preventive migraine treatments can help inform clinical decision making for managing migraine in clinical practice. An anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison analysis was conducted using pooled participant-level data from two phase 3 atogepant trials (ADVANCE and PROGRESS) and one phase 2/3 rimegepant trial (BHV3000-305) to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety/tolerability of atogepant and rimegepant as preventive migraine treatments. Participants receiving atogepant 60 mg once daily, rimegepant orally disintegrating tablet 75 mg once every other day, and placebo were included. Only participants meeting the BHV3000-305 inclusion/exclusion criteria were analyzed: ≥6 monthly migraine days and ≤18 monthly headache days at baseline. The primary efficacy assessment of interest was change in monthly migraine days across weeks 1-12. There were 252 participants in the atogepant group and 348 in the rimegepant group. Across weeks 1-12, atogepant 60 mg demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in mean monthly migraine days compared with rimegepant 75 mg (mean difference [95% CI]: -1.65 [-2.49, -0.81]; p < 0.001). Both atogepant and rimegepant demonstrated similar safety/tolerability profiles. In this matching-adjusted indirect comparison analysis, oral atogepant 60 mg once daily demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in monthly migraine days compared with rimegepant 75 mg orally disintegrating tablet once every other day.

Real-world effectiveness of erenumab in Japanese patients with migraine

BackgroundReal-world evidence of erenumab effectiveness in migraine patients in Asia with various comorbidities and multiple previous medication failures is still limited. MethodsA 6-month single-center cohort study of 45 patients with episodic or chronic migraine (CM) treated with erenumab was conducted. In the cohort, 60.0% were switching from other calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs), and 66.7% had ≥4 prophylaxis failures. The change in monthly migraine days (MMDs) from baseline and percentages of responders after treatment were calculated. Weekly migraine days (WMDs) were obtained at baseline and at months 1, 2 and 3 and were compared between weeks 2 and 4. ResultsIn total, 36%, 47%, and 63% of patients had a ≥30% response at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. The cumulative percentage of patients achieving a ≥30% response over 6 months was 85%. Early responders (average ≥ 30% response at 1–3 months) accounted for 37.8%, 55.6%, and 25.9% of the total, CGRP mAb-naïve, and CGRP mAb-switching groups, respectively. Late responders (average < 30% response at 1–3 months and average ≥ 30% response at 4–6 months) accounted for 46.4%, 37.5%, and 58.8% of nonearly responders in the total, CGRP mAb-naïve, and CGRP mAb-switching groups, respectively. Mild adverse reactions were observed in 5 patients (11.1%). Wearing-off, defined as an increase in the number of WMDs ≥2 between week 2 and week 4, was observed in 2.4–12.5% at months 1–3. ConclusionErenumab was effective in migraine patients. At least 4–6 months may be preferable for efficacy evaluation in patients switching to erenumab from other CGRP mAbs.

Real-world experience with calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeted antibodies for migraine prevention: a retrospective observational cohort study at two Japanese headache centers

BackgroundAlthough randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-targeted monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) are an efficacious and safe therapeutic modality for migraine prevention, their clinical benefits have not been well validated in Japanese patients in the real-world setting. The present study aimed to evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and erenumab in Japanese patients with migraine.MethodsThis observational retrospective cohort study was conducted at two headache centers in Japan. Patients with migraine who had experienced treatment failure with at least one traditional oral migraine preventive agent were treated with a CGRP mAb de novo. The primary efficacy endpoints were the changes from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMDs) and Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) score after 3 dosing intervals (V3). We explored whether demographic and clinical characteristics predicted therapeutic outcomes at V3.ResultsSixty-eight patients who completed three doses of a CGRP mAb (85.3% female [58/68], mean age: 46.2 ± 13.1 years) were included in the analysis. There were 19 patients with chronic migraine. The baseline MMDs were 13.4 ± 6.0. After 3 doses, the MMDs significantly decreased to 7.4 ± 5.5 (p < 0.0001), and the 50% response rate was 50.0%. HIT-6 score was significantly reduced from 66.7 ± 5.4 to 56.2 ± 8.7 after 3 doses (P = 0.0001). There was a positive correlation between the changes in MMDs and HIT-6 score from baseline after 2 doses (p = 0.0189). Those who achieved a ≥ 50% therapeutic response after the first and second doses were significantly more likely to do so at V3 (crude odds ratio: 3.474 [95% CI: 1.037 to 10.4], p = 0.0467). The most frequent adverse event was constipation (7.4%). None of the adverse events were serious, and there was no need for treatment discontinuation.ConclusionsThis real-world study demonstrated that CGRP mAbs conferred Japanese patients with efficacious and safe migraine prevention, and an initial positive therapeutic response was predictive of subsequent favorable outcomes. Concomitant measurement of MMDs and HIT-6 score was useful in evaluating the efficacy of CGRP mAbs in migraine prevention.

Real-world evidence of fremanezumab for treating migraine in Japan: a retrospective study

BackgroundThere have been very few real-world studies reported in the literature solely focusing on fremanezumab in Asia. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fremanezumab in a real-world setting in Japan.MethodThis single-centered, observational, retrospective study examined patients with migraines who received four doses of fremanezumab between December 2021 and August 2022 at Keio University Hospital. We assessed the changes in monthly migraine days, responder rates, and migraine-associated symptoms, as well as injection site reactions and adverse events.ResultTwenty-nine patients were enrolled, wherein 79.3% were women. Compared with those at baseline, the monthly migraine days decreased by 5.9 days at 4 months. The 50% responder rate was 55.2% at 4 months. A total of 57.9%, 47.8%, and 65.0% of patients showed improvement in the severity of photophobia, phonophobia, and nausea/vomiting, respectively. Moreover, injection site reactions were the most common adverse events (55.2%).ConclusionFremanezumab is effective and safe for migraine prevention in Japan. Fremanezumab also improved migraine-associated symptoms in half of the patients.

Very-low-calorie ketogenic diet vs hypocaloric balanced diet in the prevention of high-frequency episodic migraine: the EMIKETO randomized, controlled trial

BackgroundMigraine is the second world’s cause of disability. Among non-pharmacological treatments, nutritional intervention, particularly ketogenic diet, represents one of the most promising approaches.MethodsThis a prospective, single center, randomized, controlled study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of a very low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) compared to a hypocaloric balanced diet (HBD) in migraine prophylaxis in patients affected by high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) with a Body Mass Index (BMI) > 27 kg/m2. Fifty-seven patients were randomly assigned to a VLCKD (group 1) or HBD (group 2). Group 1 patients followed a VLCKD for 8 weeks, followed by a low calorie diet (LCD, weeks 9–12), and a HBD (weeks 13–24), whereas group 2 patients followed a HBD from week 0 to 24. Anthropometric indexes, urine and blood chemistry were assessed at enrollment, baseline, weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24. Migraine characteristics were evaluated at baseline, weeks 8, 12 and 24. Change in monthly migraine days (MMDs) at weeks 5–8 compared to baseline was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints encompassed changes in visual analogue scale (VAS), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) and Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) scores. We also studied effects on circulating lymphocytes and markers of inflammation, changes in plasma aldosterone and renin levels before and after VLCKD or HBD treatment.ResultsReduction from baseline in MMDs was greater in VLCKD compared to HBD group at week 8 (p = 0.008), at week 12 (p = 0.007), when ketosis had been interrupted by carbohydrates reintroduction, and at week 24 (p = 0.042), when all patients were following the same dietary regimen. Quality of life scores (SF-36) were improved in VLCKD group at week 8 and 12, and were also improved in HBD group, but only at week 12. Weight-loss was significantly higher in VLCKD group at week 8 (p = 0.002) and week 12 (p = 0.020). At the end of the study weight loss was maintained in VLCKD group whereas a slight weight regain was observed in HBD group. Inflammatory indexes, namely C reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and total white blood cell count (WBC) were significantly reduced (p < 0.05) in VLCKD group at week 12. Aldosterone plasma level were significantly increased in both groups at week 8, particularly in VLCKD group. However, electrolytes and renin plasma levels were never altered throughout the study in both groups.ConclusionsVLCKD is more effective than HBD in reducing MMD in patients with HFEM and represents an effective prophylaxis in patients with overweight/obesity.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04360148.

Switching between anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies: A comparison of monthly and quarterly dosing

BackgroundAnti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRPmAbs) have dramatically changed preventive treatment options for patients with migraine. Although there is emerging real-world evidence on the use of CGRPmAbs globally, the change in efficacy and safety after switching between CGRPmAbs owing to patients' frequency of hospital visits preference remains unknown. MethodsWe conducted a single-centre, retrospective, real-world study of patients with migraine who first received galcanezumab for 3 or 4 months and then switched to fremanezumab at Keio University Hospital. We investigated changes in monthly migraine days (MMD), responder rate, and adverse effects such as injection site reactions. ResultsMMD increased only by 0.7 (95% CI, −4.1–5.5; p = 0.748) after 4 months of treatment with fremanezumab (6.1, 95% CI, 2.3–9.9) compared to before switching (5.4, 95% CI, 2.2–8.6). Furthermore, switching from galcanezumab to fremanezumab produced only minor adverse events, such as injection site reactions. ConclusionsAfter switching from galcanezumab to fremanezumab out of the desire to visit the hospital less often, the reduction in MMD compared to baseline was sustained, and no serious adverse effects were observed.

Effect of COVID vaccination on monthly migraine days: a longitudinal cohort study.

This longitudinal cohort study aimed to investigate changes in migraine-related outcomes following COVID-19 infection and vaccination. We identified 547 clinically diagnosed migraine patients from the Leiden Headache Center who kept a headache E-diary during the COVID-19 pandemic (February 2020 to August 2022). We sent a questionnaire to register their COVID-19 infection and/or vaccination dates. After applying inclusion criteria, n = 59 participants could be included in the infection analysis and n = 147 could be included in the vaccination analysis. Primary outcome was the change in monthly migraine days (MMD) between 1 month prior and 1 month post COVID-19 infection or vaccination. Secondary outcome variables were change in monthly headache days (MHD) and monthly acute medication days (MAMD). Vaccination against COVID-19 was associated with an increase in MMD (1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.57-1.55; p < 0.001), MHD (1.52; 95% CI = 0.91-2.14; p < 0.001) and MAMD (0.72; 95% CI = 0.33-1.12; p < 0.001) in the first month post-vaccination. COVID-19 infection solely increased the number of MAMD (1.11; 95% CI = 0.10-1.62; p < 0.027), but no statistically significant differences in MMD or MHD were observed. Our findings imply that vaccination against COVID-19 is associated with an increase in migraine, indicating a possible role of inflammatory mediators in migraine pathophysiology.

Real-world experience with monthly and quarterly dosing of fremanezumab for the treatment of patients with migraine in Japan.

The effectiveness of fremanezumab in treating migraine has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials. However, real-world study results are still limited. We conducted a single-center, observational study that included patients with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) who received fremanezumab monthly or quarterly over 6-month periods. The primary outcome of this study was to evaluate changes in monthly migraine days (MMD) and responder achievement after treatment with fremanezumab. The secondary aim was to characterize the predictors of responder at 6 months. We also evaluated the effectiveness of fremanezumab in the patients who switched from other calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies, and compared the effectiveness of fremanezumab between the monthly and quarterly dosing groups. One hundred twenty-seven patients with migraine (age, 45.2 ± 12.6 years; 96 women) who received at least one dose of fremanezumab with ≥3 months of follow-up were included. The number of MMD was assessed by headache diary. The changes in MMD from baseline at 1, 3, and 6 months were -6.1 ± 4.7, -7.7 ± 4.4, and - 8.5 ± 4.5 days in the total cohort, respectively (p < 0.001). The ≥50%, ≥ 75 and 100% responder rates at 6 months were 67.6, 22.5, and 5.4% in the total cohort, 90.4, 36.5, and 9.6% in the EM group, and 52.2, 14.9, and 1.5% in the CM group, respectively. Fremanezumab was also effective in 35 patients who switched from other CGRP monoclonal antibodies. Quarterly and monthly fremanezumab doses were equally effective in MMD reduction in the EM and CM groups. In the CM group, 65.1% experienced remission to EM after 6 months. Adverse reactions were mild and occurred in 9.5% of total patients. An at least ≥50% reduction in MMD from months 1 to 3 better predicted a ≥ 50% reduction in MMD at 6 months with 90.5% sensitivity and 80.6% specificity (p < 0.001). In our real-world study, quarterly and monthly fremanezumab dosing showed both favorable effectiveness and tolerability in patients with migraine.

Comparing Migraine Headache Index vs. Monthly Migraine Days Following Nerve Deactivation for Headache: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Nerve deactivation surgery for the treatment of migraine has quickly evolved over the last two decades. Studies typically report changes in migraine frequency (attacks/month), attack duration, attack intensity, and their composite score, the migraine headache index (MHI), as primary outcomes. However, the neurology literature predominantly reports migraine prophylaxis outcomes as change in monthly migraine days (MMD). Therefore, the goal of this study is to foster common communication between plastic surgeons and neurologists by assessing the effect of nerve deactivation surgery on monthly migraine days (MMD) and motivating future studies to include MMD in their reported outcomes. An updated literature search was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The National Library of Medicine (PubMed), Scopus, and EMBASE were systematically searched for relevant articles. Data was extracted and analyzed from studies which met the inclusion criteria. A total of 19 studies were included. There was a significant overall reduction in monthly migraine days (mean difference [MD] 14.11, 95% CI 10.95 to 17.27; I2 = 92%), total migraine attacks per month (MD 8.65, 95% CI 7.84 to 9.46, I2 = 90%), migraine headache index (MD 76.59, 95% CI 60.85 to 92.32; I2 = 98%), migraine attack intensity (MD 3.84, 95% CI 3.35 to 4.33; I2 = 98%), and migraine attack duration (MD 11.80, 95% CI 6.44 to 17.16; I2 = 99%) at follow-up (range 6-38 months). This study demonstrates the efficacy of nerve deactivation surgery on the outcomes used in both the PRS and neurology literature.

Estimating treatment effects on health utility scores for patients living with migraine: a post hoc analysis of the DELIVER trial

ABSTRACT Background This post hoc analysis aimed to estimate eptinezumab’s therapeutic effect on health utilities and determined to which extent monthly migraine days (MMDs) explain changes in health utilities. Research Design/Methods DELIVER, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3b trial (NCT04418765), investigated eptinezumab efficacy and safety in patients with 2-4 prior migraine treatment failures. Regression analysis explored the relationship between utility scores and MMDs, with eptinezumab treatment as a covariate along with MMDs to identify any MMD-independent effect on utilities. Path analysis quantified eptinezumab’s impact as mediated through MMD reduction. Results The base case model showed that each reduction in MMD was associated with a mean utility score increase (0.0189; 95% CI: 0.0180, 0.0198; P < 0.001). Mean utility score was generally higher for eptinezumab versus placebo, justifying addition of treatment effect to the base case model. Patients administered eptinezumab had on average 0.0562 (95% CI: 0.0382, 0.0742; P < 0.001) higher utility versus placebo when controlling for number of MMDs. From path analysis, MMD reduction resulting from eptinezumab treatment accounted for 53% additional utility gain observed in patients. Conclusions Changes in MMDs alone inadequately captured migraine’s impact on patient utility, as there was also a positive eptinezumab-driven, treatment-specific impact on utility score. Trial Registration The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (CT.gov identifier: NCT04418765).

Preventive Treatment With Eptinezumab in Patients With a Dual Diagnosis of Chronic Migraine and Medication-Overuse Headache: Subgroup Analysis of PROMISE-2 (S47.006)

Preventive Treatment With Eptinezumab in Patients With a Dual Diagnosis of Chronic Migraine and Medication-Overuse Headache: Subgroup Analysis of PROMISE-2 (S47.006)

Switching from galcanezumab to fremanezumab in migraine patients: a retrospective analysis (P7-12.011)

Switching from galcanezumab to fremanezumab in migraine patients: a retrospective analysis (P7-12.011)

Lack of “wearing off” effect with eptinezumab in the preventive treatment of migraine (P13-12.009)

Lack of “wearing off” effect with eptinezumab in the preventive treatment of migraine (P13-12.009)

Early and sustained efficacy of fremanezumab over 24-weeks in migraine patients with multiple preventive treatment failures: the multicenter, prospective, real-life FRIEND2 study

BackgroundTo verify the long-term (24-week) efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fremanezumab in real-life patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM: ≥ 8 days/month) or chronic migraine (CM: ≥ 15 days/month), and multiple preventive treatment failures.MethodsThis is a prospective, cohort, real-life study at 28 headache centers on consecutive patients affected by HFEM or CM with multiple preventive treatment failures who were prescribed subcutaneous fremanezumab (225 mg monthly/675 mg quarterly) for ≥ 24 weeks. Primary endpoint was the change in monthly migraine days (MMDs) in HFEM and monthly headache days (MHDs) in CM at weeks 21–24 compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints encompassed changes in monthly analgesic medications, ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, and 100% responder rates, and variation in NRS, HIT-6 and MIDAS scores at the same time interval. Changes in MMDs/MHDs, monthly analgesic medications, ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, and 100% responder rates, and variation in NRS and HIT-6 scores at week 4 were also monitored.ResultsFour hundred ten patients who had received ≥ 1 dose of fremanezumab were considered for safety analysis while 148 patients treated for ≥ 24 weeks were included in the efficacy analysis. At weeks 21–24, fremanezumab significantly (p < 0.001) reduced MMDs, MHDs, monthly analgesic medications and NRS, HIT-6, and MIDAS scores in both HFEM and CM compared to baseline. The proportions of ≥ 50%, ≥ 75% and 100% responders at weeks 21-24were 75.0%, 30.8%, 9.6% (HFEM), and 72.9, 44.8 and 1% (CM). A significant (p < 0.001) decrease in MMDs, MHDs, monthly analgesic medications and NRS, HIT-6, and MIDAS scores in both HFEM and CM was already present at week 4. The proportions of ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, and 100% responders at week 4 were 67.6%, 32.4%, 11.8% (HFEM) and 67.3%, 40%, 1.8% (CM). CM remitted to episodic migraine and medication overuse to no-medication overuse in 83.3 and 75% of patients at week 24, and in 80 and 72.4% at week 4. Adverse events were rare (2.4%), mild and transient. No patient discontinued treatment for any reason.ConclusionsFremanezumab is characterized by an early and sustained efficacy in HFEM and CM patients with multiple preventive treatment failures in real-life, revealing an optimal safety and tolerability profile.

Real-world evidence of galcanezumab for migraine treatment in Japan: a retrospective analysis

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab in patients with migraine in a real-world setting in Japan.BackgroundGalcanezumab is the first anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody approved in Japan. To the best of our knowledge, no real-world studies on galcanezumab have been published in any international journal from Japan.MethodsWe retrospectively examined patients with migraine who received three doses of galcanezumab between August 2021 and February 2022 at the Keio University Hospital. We assessed changes in monthly migraine days, responder rate, and migraine-associated and premonitory symptoms. We also investigated injection site reactions and adverse events.ResultsFifty-two patients received three doses of galcanezumab during the study period. Compared with those at baseline, the monthly migraine days decreased by 5.9 days (95% confidence interval, 4.2–7.7) at 3 months. The 50% responder rate was 61.5% at 3 months. A total of 64.9%, 50.0%, and 63.9% of patients showed improvement in the severity of photophobia, phonophobia, and nausea/vomiting, respectively. Premonitory symptoms without subsequent headache were reported in 62.5% of patients. Moreover, injection site reaction was the most common adverse event (34.6%).ConclusionThis study revealed the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for migraineurs in Japan. Galcanezumab also improved migraine-associated symptoms. However, despite a reduction in headaches, premonitory symptoms without subsequent headache were reported in > 50% of the patients at 3 months.

A phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled study of erenumab for the prevention of chronic migraine in patients from Asia: the DRAGON study

AbstactBackgroundDRAGON was a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study which evaluated the efficacy and safety of erenumab in patients with chronic migraine (CM) from Asia not adequately represented in the global pivotal CM study.MethodsDRAGON study was conducted across 9 Asian countries or regions including mainland China, India, the Republic of Korea, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. Patients (N = 557) with CM (aged 18–65 years) were randomised (1:1) to receive once-monthly subcutaneous erenumab 70 mg or matching placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in monthly migraine days (MMD) from baseline to the last 4 weeks of the 12-week double-blind treatment phase (DBTP). Secondary endpoints included achievement of ≥ 50% reduction in MMD, change in monthly acute headache medication days, modified migraine disability assessment (mMIDAS), and safety. Study was powered for the primary endpoint of change from baseline in MMD.ResultsAt baseline, the mean (SD) age was 41.7 (± 10.9) years, and 81.5% (n = 454) patients were women. The mean migraine duration was 18.0 (± 11.6) years, and the mean MMD was 19.2 (± 5.4). 97.8% (n = 545) randomised patients completed the DBTP. Overall, demographics and baseline characteristics were balanced between the erenumab and placebo groups except for a slightly higher proportion of women in the placebo group. At Week 12, the adjusted mean change from baseline in MMD was − 8.2 days for erenumab and − 6.6 days for placebo, with a statistically significant difference for erenumab versus placebo (adjusted mean difference vs placebo: − 1.57 [95%CI: − 2.83, − 0.30]; P = 0.015). A greater proportion of patients treated with erenumab achieved ≥ 50% reduction in MMD versus placebo (47.0% vs 36.7%, P = 0.014). At Week 12, greater reductions in monthly acute headache medication days (− 5.34 vs − 4.66) and mMIDAS scores (− 14.67 vs − 12.93) were observed in patients treated with erenumab versus placebo. Safety and tolerability profile of erenumab was comparable to placebo, except the incidence of constipation (8.6% for erenumab vs 3.2% for placebo).ConclusionDRAGON study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of erenumab 70 mg in patients with CM from Asia. No new safety signals were observed during the DBTP compared with the previous trials.Trial registrationNCT03867201