Changes In Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels Research Articles

A retrospective nationwide analysis of evolocumab use in Sweden and its effect on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.

Treatment with proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and decreases the incidence of major ischaemic events in clinical trials. However, less is known about the efficacy of PCSK9 inhibition in clinical practice. This study aimed to describe the change in LDL-C levels over time and LDL-C goal achievement in patients with/without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), who were prescribed evolocumab in clinical practice, and to describe adherence to and persistence with treatment. Patients in Sweden with at least one evolocumab prescription filled between July 2015 and May 2020 were included. Medical history and lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) were sourced from national registries. LDL-C levels before and after treatment initiation were assessed using medical records. Persistence with and adherence to evolocumab and oral LLT were assessed up to 12 months after treatment initiation using the refill-gap method and proportion of days covered, respectively. Of the 2,360 patients with at least one prescription for evolocumab, 2,341 were included; 1,858 had ASCVD. Persistence with (76%) and adherence to (86%) evolocumab were high throughout the 12 months following initiation. Mean LDL-C levels decreased by 53% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 51-55%) in patients adherent to evolocumab (n = 567) and 59% (95% CI: 55-63%) in patients adherent to evolocumab and oral LLT (n = 186). Similar reductions in LDL-C were observed in patients with/without ASCVD. Reduced LDL-C levels remained stable during follow-up. Amongst patients adherent to evolocumab and those adherent to evolocumab and oral LLT, 23 and 55% achieved the LDL-C goal of <1.4 mmol/L, respectively. The evolocumab LDL-C-lowering effect observed in clinical trials was confirmed in clinical practice in Sweden, particularly in patients also treated with oral LLT. During follow-up, adherence to and persistence with evolocumab were high, with stable reduced levels of LDL-C during observation.

Abstract 16180: The Adherence and LDL-C Lowering Effect of Inclisiran Among Patients Who Received Treatment at Outpatient Clinics

Introduction: Inclisiran is a novel small interfering RNA (siRNA) indicated as an adjunct to diet and maximally tolerated statin to lower LDL-C among adults with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) in the US. It is administered subcutaneously initially, again at 3 months, and then every six months by an HCP. Subsequent doses may be administered within three months after the scheduled dose without restarting a new dose schedule. Metro Infusion Center (MIC) is one of the largest infusion centers across the US with over 200 centers in 38 states and has clinician oversight over each administration. Hypothesis: To describe the real-world adherence to inclisiran and changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels associated with inclisiran use at MICs. Methods: Patient charts for those who initiated inclisiran from March 1, 2022 to November 31, 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Demographics and clinical characteristics at initiation were collected and patients were followed until May 2023 for the current analysis. The study outcomes included the proportion of eligible patients who received the 2 nd or 3 rd dose and the percent change in LDL-C levels from baseline to the latest available data. Results: A total of 562 patients were included in the analysis from 107 different MICs in over 21 states. Mean (SD) age was 70.6 (9.6) years; 51% were female. The majority of patients (80%) were covered by Medicare. 492 (88%) had a history of ASCVD and 60 (11%) had HeFH. Mean (SD) baseline LDL-C was 147.6 (59.9) mg/dl. Of the 562 patients initiated inclisiran, 531 (95%) received their 2 nd dose, and 91% received the 2 nd dose within ±7 days of the schedule. There were 233 patients eligible to receive a 3 rd dose, 196 (84%) of them had received the 3 rd dose. Among 274 patients who had the LDL-C measured after inclisiran initiation, the average LDL-C reduction from baseline was 46.3%. On average, the first LDL-C measurement was taken at 3 months after receiving at least one dose of Inclisiran. Conclusions: These real-world data demonstrate high adherence to inclisiran with LDL-C reductions of 46.3% at 3 months. This finding was consistent with the ORION clinical development program.

Long-term treatment persistence and maintained reduction of LDL-cholesterol levels with evolocumab over 30 months: Results from the Spanish cohort of the European prospective HEYMANS study

AimsLimited data exist on low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) level variability or long-term persistence with the monoclonal antibody evolocumab in routine clinical practice. HEYMANS (NCT02770131) is the first multi-country, multicenter, observational study of European patients initiating evolocumab as part of their routine clinical management, based on local reimbursement criteria (overall data recently published). The aim of this analysis is to describe clinical characteristics, baseline and changes in LDL-C levels, treatment patterns and persistence to evolocumab over 30 months in the Spanish cohort using data from the HEYMANS Registry. MethodsHEYMANS was a prospective study of adult patients (≥18 years) who received at least one dose of evolocumab. A total of 1951 patients were enrolled from 12 countries and were followed up for 30 months after evolocumab initiation. Data were collected for 6 months before evolocumab initiation and up to 30 months thereafter. The Spanish cohort included patients who started evolocumab in routine clinical practice from March 2016 to September 2019. Demographic and clinical characteristics, lipid-lowering therapies (LLT), and lipid levels were collected. ResultsIn total, 201 patients were included in the Spanish cohort. Median follow-up (Q1–Q3) was 30.0 (12–30) months. A total of 61.7% of patients were men and the mean (standard deviation) age was 59.5 (10.8) years. Most patients (68.7%) had experienced a prior cardiovascular event, 45.3% had coronary artery disease or stable angina, and 60.2% had a diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia. Overall, 57.7% of patients were receiving treatment with statins, most of them with high-intensity statins (85.3%); 45.8% of patients were intolerant to statins, and 26.4% of patients did not receive any LLT. At baseline, median (Q1–Q3) LDL-C levels were 151 (123–197) mg/dL. After 3 months of treatment, baseline LDL-C decreased by 66% to a median of 50 (30–83) mg/dL and these levels were maintained over time, with a median LDL-C of 55 (40–99) mg/dL at 30 months. At months 10–12 of treatment, LDL-C levels<55mg/dL were achieved by 56.3% of patients. LDL-C levels<70mg/dL were achieved by 70.1% of patients, and a lowering of LDL-C levels ≥50% was achieved by 76.8% of patients. The percentage of patients on evolocumab treatment was 95% at 12 months and 93% at 30 months. ConclusionsIn the Spanish cohort in routine clinical practice, evolocumab therapy provided a reduction in LDL-C levels consistent with that reported in previous clinical trials, which was sustained during 30 months of follow-up. Treatment with evolocumab was started at LDL-C levels 50% higher than those recommended by The Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis and the Therapeutic Positioning Report. The probability of achieving the 2019 ESC/EAS LDL-C goals would improve with combination therapy and also with a lower LDL-C threshold when starting evolocumab. Persistence to evolocumab remained high during follow-up, with a very low percentage of discontinuation (5% at 12 months; 7% at 30 months).

Factors influencing drug switching and changes in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels with atorvastatin: a real-world observational study

BackgroundAlthough generic drugs have been approved with the assurance of interchangeable applications with original drugs, some physicians, and patients still view their efficacy and interchangeability negatively. Using real-world data, we aimed to determine factors that impact switching between drugs that contain the same active ingredient, i.e., atorvastatin, and, in turn, whether this ‘switch’ could alter clinical outcomes.MethodsUsing the National Health Insurance Service senior cohort, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to assess patients who had newly started atorvastatin 10 mg and had at least two records of national health examinations from 2010 to 2014. Drug switching, which was defined as a change in the atorvastatin product administered 90 days before the first and second examinations, was assessed. Greedy propensity score matching (1:2) was performed between switchers and non-switchers to control for potential confounders. Factors influencing switching were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Changes in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels attributable to drug switching were evaluated using difference-in-differences regression.ResultsA total of 1,588 patients were included, of whom 25.3% switched drugs (1,187 non-switchers and 401 switchers). Compared to patients taking generics before the first examination, those taking the original drugs had a lower odds ratio (0.31; 95% CI [0.21, 0.46]) for subsequent drug switching. A change in medical institution was associated with a significantly higher odds ratio (6.83; 95% CI [4.66, 10.02]). There were no significant differences in LDL-C alterations between switchers and non-switchers (0.42 mg/dL; 95% CI [-2.29, 3.13]).ConclusionThe type of first-time drug administered and changes in medical institution can influence drug switching. No significant changes in LDL-C values were observed in the various switching scenarios between the original and generic drugs, suggesting their interchangeable application in real-world clinical practice.

Tafolecimab in Chinese Patients With Hypercholesterolemia (CREDIT-4): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trial

BackgroundTafolecimab is a novel fully human proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibody, developed for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of tafolecimab in Chinese patients at high or very high cardiovascular risk with hypercholesterolemia. MethodsPatients with diagnoses of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) by the Simon Broome criteria or at high or very high cardiovascular risk with nonfamilial hypercholesterolemia, with screening low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level ≥1.8 mmol/L, were randomized 2:1 to receive tafolecimab or placebo 450 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) in the 12-week double-blind treatment period. The primary endpoint was the percent change from baseline to week 12 in LDL-C levels. ResultsA total of 303 patients were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of tafolecimab (n = 205) or placebo (n = 98). The least squares mean percent change in LDL-C level from baseline to week 12 was –68.9% (SE 1.4%) in the tafolecimab group and –5.8% (1.8%) in the placebo group (difference: –63.0%; [95% CI: –66.5% to –59.6%]; P < 0.0001). More patients treated with tafolecimab achieved ≥50% LDL-C reductions, LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L, and LDL-C <1.4 mmol/L at week 12 than did those in the placebo group (all P < 0.0001). Furthermore, tafolecimab markedly reduced non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein(a) levels. During the double-blind treatment period, the most commonly reported adverse events included urinary tract infection (5.9% with tafolecimab vs 4.1% with placebo) and hyperuricemia (3.4% vs 4.1%). ConclusionsTafolecimab was safe and showed robust lipid-lowering efficacy in Chinese patients at high or very high cardiovascular risk with hypercholesterolemia. (A Study of IBI306 in Participants With Hypercholesterolemia; NCT04709536)

Long-term treatment persistence and maintained reduction of LDL-cholesterol levels with evolocumab over 30 months: Results from the Spanish cohort of the European prospective HEYMANS study

AimsLimited data exist on low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) level variability or long-term persistence with the monoclonal antibody evolocumab in routine clinical practice. HEYMANS (NCT02770131) is the first multi-country, multicenter, observational study of European patients initiating evolocumab as part of their routine clinical management, based on local reimbursement criteria (overall data recently published). The aim of this analysis is to describe clinical characteristics, baseline and changes in LDL-C levels, treatment patterns and persistence to evolocumab over 30 months in the Spanish cohort using data from the HEYMANS Registry. MethodsHEYMANS was a prospective study of adult patients (≥18 years) who received at least one dose of evolocumab. A total of 1951 patients were enrolled from 12 countries and were followed up for 30 months after evolocumab initiation. Data were collected for 6 months before evolocumab initiation and up to 30 months thereafter. The Spanish cohort included patients who started evolocumab in routine clinical practice from March 2016 to September 2019. Demographic and clinical characteristics, lipid-lowering therapies (LLT), and lipid levels were collected. ResultsIn total, 201 patients were included in the Spanish cohort. Median follow-up (Q1–Q3) was 30.0 (12–30) months. A total of 61.7% of patients were men and the mean (standard deviation) age was 59.5 (10.8) years. Most patients (68.7%) had experienced a prior cardiovascular event, 45.3% had coronary artery disease or stable angina, and 60.2% had a diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia. Overall, 57.7% of patients were receiving treatment with statins, most of them with high-intensity statins (85.3%); 45.8% of patients were intolerant to statins, and 26.4% of patients did not receive any LLT. At baseline, median (Q1–Q3) LDL-C levels were 151 (123–197) mg/dL. After 3 months of treatment, baseline LDL-C decreased by 66% to a median of 50 (30–83) mg/dL and these levels were maintained over time, with a median LDL-C of 55 (40–99) mg/dL at 30 months. At months 10–12 of treatment, LDL-C levels<55mg/dL were achieved by 56.3% of patients. LDL-C levels<70mg/dL were achieved by 70.1% of patients, and a lowering of LDL-C levels ≥50% was achieved by 76.8% of patients. The percentage of patients on evolocumab treatment was 95% at 12 months and 93% at 30 months. ConclusionsIn the Spanish cohort in routine clinical practice, evolocumab therapy provided a reduction in LDL-C levels consistent with that reported in previous clinical trials, which was sustained during 30 months of follow-up. Treatment with evolocumab was started at LDL-C levels 50% higher than those recommended by The Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis and the Therapeutic Positioning Report. The probability of achieving the 2019 ESC/EAS LDL-C goals would improve with combination therapy and also with a lower LDL-C threshold when starting evolocumab. Persistence to evolocumab remained high during follow-up, with a very low percentage of discontinuation (5% at 12 months; 7% at 30 months).

Reduction of C-reactive protein, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and its relationship with cardiovascular events of different lipid-lowering therapies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background:To evaluate the reductions of C-reactive protein (CRP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in different lipid-lowering drugs, and to assess the relationships between the reductions of CRP, LDL-C, and cardiovascular (CV) events.Methods:We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to September 1, 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing statins, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9-mAbs), or ezetimibe against placebo with a treatment duration of at least 4 weeks and data on the effects of cholesterol-lowering interventions on LDL-C and CRP were included in this meta-analysis. The weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.Results:Compared with placebo treatment, statins and ezetimibe treatments resulted in a significant decrease in LDL-C level (statins: WMD −47.94 mg/dL, 95% CI −51.21 to −44.67 mg/dL; ezetimibe: WMD −22.84 mg/dL, 95% CI −26.76 to −18.92 mg/dL) and CRP level (statins: WMD −0.67 mg/L, 95% CI −0.90 to −0.45 mg/dL; ezetimibe: −0.64 mg/L, 95% CI −1.07 to −0.21 mg/dL). Compared with placebo treatment, treatment with PCSK9-mAbs resulted in significant decrease in LDL-C level (WMD −54.24 mg/dL, 95% CI −59.77 to −48.70 mg/dL), while the concentration of CRP did not decrease significantly. Meta-regression analysis showed no significant association between change in CRP level and change in LDL-C level. Subgroup comparisons suggested that treatment with PCSK9-mAbs showed a greater reduction in LDL-C level when compared with the statins group and ezetimibe group, while the risks of CV death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke showed no significant differences.Conclusion:Based on the current study, our results suggested that statins, ezetimibe, and PCSK9-mAbs are effective in reducing LDL-C levels. Treatment with statins and ezetimibe also demonstrated a significant effect on CRP. The traditional lipid-lowering strategy including statin and ezetimibe showed similar benefit on CV outcomes compared with the PCSK9-mAbs treatment.

Non-fasting Changes in Blood Lipids After Three Daily Meals Within a Day in Chinese Inpatients With Cardiovascular Diseases.

BackgroundNon-fasting (i.e., postprandial) lipid detection is recommended in clinical practice. However, the change in blood lipids in Chinese patients with cardiovascular diseases after three daily meals has never been reported yet.MethodsSerum levels of blood lipids were measured or calculated in 77 inpatients (48 men and 29 women) at high or very high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in the fasting state and at 4 h after three meals within a day according to their diet habits.ResultsFemale patients showed significantly higher level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) than male patients, and the gender difference in other lipid parameters did not reach statistical significance at any time-point. Levels of triglyceride (TG) and remnant cholesterol (RC) increased, while that of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) decreased significantly after three meals (p < 0.05). Levels of HDL-C, total cholesterol (TC), and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) showed smaller changes after three meals. Percent reductions in the non-fasting LDL-C levels after lunch and supper were around 20%, which were greater than that after breakfast. The percent reductions in the non-fasting non-HDL-C levels after three meals were smaller than those in the non-fasting LDL-C levels. Patients with TG level ≥ 2.0 mmol/L (177 mg/dL) after lunch had significantly greater absolute reduction of LDL-C level than those with TG level < 2.0 mmol/L (177 mg/dL) after lunch [–0.69 mmol/L (–27 mg/dL) vs. –0.36 mmol/L (–14 mg/dL), p<0.01]. There was a significant and negative correlation between absolute change in LDL-C level and that in TG level (r = −0.32) or RC level (r = −0.67) after lunch (both p<0.01).ConclusionLDL-C level decreased significantly after three daily meals in Chinese patients at high or very high risk of ASCVD, especially when TG level reached its peak after lunch. Relatively, non-HDL-C level was more stable than LDL-C level postprandially. Therefore, when LDL-C level was measured in the non-fasting state, non-HDL-C level could be evaluated simultaneously to reduce the interference of related factors, such as postprandial hypertriglyceridemia, on detection.

Evaluating the Association Between Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Reduction and Relative and Absolute Effects of Statin Treatment

The association between statin-induced reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and the absolute risk reduction of individual, rather than composite, outcomes, such as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke, is unclear. To assess the association between absolute reductions in LDL-C levels with treatment with statin therapy and all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke to facilitate shared decision-making between clinicians and patients and inform clinical guidelines and policy. PubMed and Embase were searched to identify eligible trials from January 1987 to June 2021. Large randomized clinical trials that examined the effectiveness of statins in reducing total mortality and cardiovascular outcomes with a planned duration of 2 or more years and that reported absolute changes in LDL-C levels. Interventions were treatment with statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) vs placebo or usual care. Participants were men and women older than 18 years. Three independent reviewers extracted data and/or assessed the methodological quality and certainty of the evidence using the risk of bias 2 tool and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Any differences in opinion were resolved by consensus. Meta-analyses and a meta-regression were undertaken. Primary outcome: all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes: myocardial infarction, stroke. Twenty-one trials were included in the analysis. Meta-analyses showed reductions in the absolute risk of 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4%-1.2%) for all-cause mortality, 1.3% (95% CI, 0.9%-1.7%) for myocardial infarction, and 0.4% (95% CI, 0.2%-0.6%) for stroke in those randomized to treatment with statins, with associated relative risk reductions of 9% (95% CI, 5%-14%), 29% (95% CI, 22%-34%), and 14% (95% CI, 5%-22%) respectively. A meta-regression exploring the potential mediating association of the magnitude of statin-induced LDL-C reduction with outcomes was inconclusive. The results of this meta-analysis suggest that the absolute risk reductions of treatment with statins in terms of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke are modest compared with the relative risk reductions, and the presence of significant heterogeneity reduces the certainty of the evidence. A conclusive association between absolute reductions in LDL-C levels and individual clinical outcomes was not established, and these findings underscore the importance of discussing absolute risk reductions when making informed clinical decisions with individual patients.

Abstract P125: Change In Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol And Risk Of Subsequent Cardiovascular Events Among Patients With Myocardial Infarction

Background: Among patients who experience a myocardial infarction (MI), elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a major risk factor for experiencing a subsequent cardiovascular (CV) event; however, real-world evidence is lacking in regard to how changes in LDL-C levels after a MI hospitalization are related to subsequent CV events. Methods: Adults with a hospitalized MI and an available baseline LDL-C (closest LDL-C within 2 years prior to hospital discharge) between 2012 and 2018 within a 27-county region across MN and WI were included for study. For each LDL-C measurement during follow-up (starting with the first LDL-C &gt;30 days after baseline and ≤1-year post-discharge), percent change from baseline LDL-C was calculated. Patients were followed for subsequent CV events (composite endpoint 1: MI, ischemic stroke [IS], coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG], percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]; composite endpoint 2: MI, IS, CABG, PCI, CV death). Cox models were used to evaluate the association between time-dependent LDL-C percent change and CV events, stratified by baseline LDL-C (&lt;70, 70-99, ≥100 mg/dL). Results: Among 3,034 MI patients identified, 740 (24%), 940 (31%) and 1354 (45%) had a baseline LDL-C &lt;70, 70-99 and ≥100 mg/dL, respectively. After a mean follow-up of 3.4 years, 471 and 667 patients experienced the composite endpoint 1 and 2, respectively. After covariate adjustment, a trend towards a lower risk of CV events with decreasing LDL-C from baseline, compared to those with no change or an increase in LDL-C, was observed among those with a LDL-C &lt;70 and &gt; 100 mg/dl but not in those with a LDL-C 70-99 mg/dL (Table). Conclusions: In a population-based cohort of MI patients, there is evidence that patients with a decrease in LDL-C after MI may have a reduced risk of subsequent CV events. These results underscore the importance of lowering LDL-C after a MI and may help to identify subgroups at highest risk for additional CV events and those who may benefit from targeted LDL-C treatment recommendations.

The Role of Fasting LDL-C Levels in Their Non-fasting Reduction in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease.

The level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) decreases to a certain extent after daily meals; however, the influencing factor of this phenomenon has not been fully elucidated. This study included 447 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Serum levels of blood lipid parameters at 0, 2, and 4 hours (h) after a daily breakfast were monitored in all subjects. The levels of total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and non-HDL-C significantly decreased, while those of triglycerides (TG) and remnant cholesterol (RC) significantly increased from baseline to 4 h in both male and female patients (P < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that fasting LDL-C level, the non-fasting change in RC level at 4 h and fasting TG level were significant predictors of the non-fasting change in LDL-C level at 4 h in patients with CHD, and fasting LDL-C level was the most significantly associated with the non-fasting change in LDL-C level. Patients with lower levels of fasting LDL-C had smaller non-fasting changes in LDL-C levels. When the fasting LDL-C level was <1.4 mmol/L, both absolute reduction and percent reduction in LDL-C level at 4 h were almost zero, which means that the non-fasting LDL-C level at 4 h was approximately equivalent to its fasting value (P < 0.05). This result indicated that the non-fasting changes in LDL-C levels were influenced by fasting LDL-C levels in patients with CHD. When the fasting LDL-C level was <1.4 mmol/L, the non-fasting LDL-C level could replace the fasting value to guide treatment.

Qualitative Exploration of Barriers to Statin Adherence and Lipid Control

Financial incentives may improve health by rewarding patients for focusing on present actions-such as medication regimen adherence-that provide longer-term health benefits. To identify barriers to improving statin therapy adherence and control of cholesterol levels with financial incentives and insights for the design of future interventions. This qualitative study involved retrospective interviews with participants in a preplanned secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of financial incentives for statin therapy adherence. A total of 636 trial participants from several US insurer or employer populations and an academic health system were rank ordered by change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) levels. Participants with the most LDLC level improvement (high-improvement group) and those with LDLC levels that did not improve (nonimprovement group) were purposively targeted, stratified across all trial groups, for semistructured telephone interviews that were performed from April 1 to June 30, 2018. Interviews were coded using a team-based, iterative approach. Data were analyzed from July 1, 2018, to October 31, 2020. The primary outcome was mean change in LDLC level from baseline to 12 months; the secondary outcome, statin therapy adherence during the first 6 months. A total of 54 patients were interviewed, divided equally between high-improvement and nonimprovement groups, with a mean (SD) age of 43.5 (10.3) years; 36 (66.7%) were women, 28 (51.9%) had diabetes, and 18 (33.3%) had cardiovascular disease. Compared with the high-improvement group, the nonimprovement group had fewer interviewees with an annual income of greater than $50 000 (11 [40.7%] vs 22 [81.5%]), worse self-reported health (fair to poor, 13 [48.1%] vs 3 [11.1%]), more Black interviewees (16 [59.3%] vs 4 [14.8%]), and lower baseline LDLC levels (>160 mg/dL, 2 [7.4%] vs 25 [92.6%]). Participants in the nonimprovement group had a greater burden of chronic illness (≥2 chronic conditions, 13 [48.1%] vs 6 [22.2%]) and were less frequently employed (full-time, 6 [22.2%] vs 12 [44.4%]). In interviews, the nonimprovement group was less focused on risks of high LDLC levels, described less engagement in LDLC level management, articulated fewer specific nutritional choices for optimizing health, and recounted greater difficulty obtaining healthy food. Participants in both groups had difficulty describing the structure of the financial incentives but did recall features of the electronic pill containers used to track adherence and how those containers affected medication routines. Participants in a statin adherence trial whose LDLC levels did not improve found it more difficult to create medication routines and respond to financial incentives in the context of complex living conditions and a high burden of chronic illness. These findings suggest that future studies should be more attentive to socioeconomic circumstances of trial participants. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01798784.

Pooled Patient-Level Analysis of Inclisiran Trials in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia or Atherosclerosis

BackgroundInclisiran is a double-stranded small interfering RNA that suppresses proprotein convertase subtilisin–kexin type 9 (PCSK9) translation in the liver, leading to sustained reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and other atherogenic lipoproteins with twice-yearly dosing. ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to conduct a patient-level pooled analysis from 3 phase 3 studies of inclisiran. MethodsParticipants with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (ORION-9 [Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Inclisiran Treatment on Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) in Subjects With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HeFH)]), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (ORION-10 [Inclisiran for Participants With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Elevated Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol]), or ASCVD and ASCVD risk equivalents (ORION-11 [Inclisiran for Subjects With ASCVD or ASCVD-Risk Equivalents and Elevated Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol]) taking maximally tolerated statin therapy, with or without other LDL-C–lowering agents, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either inclisiran or placebo, administered by subcutaneous injection on day 1, day 90, and every 6 months thereafter for 540 days. The coprimary endpoints were the placebo-corrected percentage change in LDL-C level from baseline to day 510 and the time-adjusted percentage change in LDL-C level from baseline after day 90 to day 540. Levels of other atherogenic lipoproteins and treatment-emergent adverse events were also assessed. ResultsA total of 3,660 participants (n = 482, n = 1,561, and n = 1,617 from ORION-9, -10, and -11, respectively) underwent randomization. The placebo-corrected change in LDL-C with inclisiran at day 510 was −50.7% (95% confidence interval: −52.9% to −48.4%; p < 0.0001). The corresponding time-adjusted change in LDL-C was −50.5% (95% confidence interval: −52.1% to −48.9%; p < 0.0001). Safety was similar in both groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events at the injection site were more frequent with inclisiran than placebo (5.0% vs. 0.7%), but were predominantly mild, and none were severe or persistent. Liver and kidney function tests, creatine kinase values, and platelet counts did not differ between groups. ConclusionsThese pooled safety and efficacy data show that inclisiran, given twice yearly in addition to maximally tolerated statin therapy with or without other LDL-C lowering agents, is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment to lower LDL-C in adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, ASCVD, or ASCVD risk equivalents.

Effect of Patient Financial Incentives on Statin Adherence and Lipid Control

Financial incentives can improve medication adherence and cardiovascular disease risk, but the optimal design to promote sustained adherence after incentives are discontinued is unknown. To determine whether 6-month interventions involving different financial incentives to encourage statin adherence reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels from baseline to 12 months. This 4-group, randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 2013 to July 2018 among several large US insurer or employer populations and the University of Pennsylvania Health System. The study population included adults with elevated risk of cardiovascular disease, suboptimal LDL-C control, and evidence of imperfect adherence to statin medication. Data analysis was performed from July 2017 to June 2019. The interventions lasted 6 months during which all participants received daily medication reminders and an electronic pill bottle. Statin adherence was measured by opening the bottle. For participants randomized to the 3 intervention groups, adherence was rewarded with financial incentives. The sweepstakes group involved incentives for daily adherence. In the deadline sweepstakes group, incentives were reduced if participants were adherent only after a reminder. The sweepstakes plus deposit contract group split incentives between daily adherence and a monthly deposit reduced for each day of nonadherence. The primary outcome was change in LDL-C level from baseline to 12 months. Among 805 participants randomized (199 in the simple daily sweepstakes group, 204 in the deadline sweepstakes group, 201 in the sweepstakes plus deposit contract group, and 201 in the control group), the mean (SD) age was 58.5 (10.3) years; 519 participants (64.5%) were women, 514 (63.9%) had diabetes, and 273 (33.9%) had cardiovascular disease. The mean (SD) baseline LDL-C level was 143.2 (42.5) mg/dL. Measured adherence at 6 months (defined as the proportion of 180 days with electronic pill bottle opening) in the control group (0.69; 95% CI, 0.66-0.72) was lower than that in the simple sweepstakes group (0.84; 95% CI, 0.81-0.87), the deadline sweepstakes group (0.86; 95% CI, 0.83-0.89), and the sweepstakes plus deposit contract group (0.87; 95% CI, 0.84-0.90) (P < .001 for each incentive group vs control). LDL-C levels were measured for 636 participants at 12 months. Mean LDL-C level reductions from baseline to 12 months were 33.6 mg/dL (95% CI, 28.4-38.8 mg/dL) in the control group, 32.4 mg/dL (95% CI, 27.3-37.6 mg/dL) in the sweepstakes group, 33.2 mg/dL (95% CI, 28.1-38.3 mg/dL) in the deadline sweepstakes group, and 36.5 mg/dL (95% CI, 31.3-41.7 mg/dL) in the sweepstakes plus deposit contract group (adjusted P > .99 for each incentive group vs control). Compared with the control group, different financial incentives improved measured statin adherence but not LDL-C levels. This result points to the importance of directly measuring health outcomes, rather than simply adherence, in trials aimed at improving health behaviors. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01798784.

Comparison of novel LDL cholesterol equations in myocardial infarction patients: Clinical impact on risk re-classification and lipid treatment goals on secondary prevention

Background and aimsNumerous low-density lipoprotein (LDL) calculating equations for more accurate estimation have emerged. With the present study, we assessed the clinical impact of implementing novel equations in terms of risk reclassification and LDL treatment goals in myocardial infarction (MI) patients. MethodsThis was a post-hoc analysis of a prospective acute MI cohort study. We enrolled 805 consecutive patients presenting with acute MI. Patients with high triglyceride levels (>400 mg/dL) were excluded. In the remaining 773 acute MI patients, LDL cholesterol levels were calculated using 12 different equations including the Friedewald equation. Each patient was categorized into a 5-scale risk strata scheme according to baseline LDL cholesterol levels. Moreover, ΔLDL cholesterol (change in LDL cholesterol levels to achieve the <55 mg/dL LDL treatment goal) was calculated for each patient. ResultsMean levels and distribution of LDL cholesterol were significantly different compared to those derived from the Friedewald equation. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) analysis, as well as heat maps, showed that this re-categorization had no significant impact on prognostic terms (NRI ranged from −6.1% to 5.9% with p values > 0.05 for each comparison). Statistically significant differences were observed in ΔLDL cholesterol levels between each one of the novel equations and the Friedewald equation. ConclusionsNovel LDL cholesterol calculating equations are not associated with a clinically significant risk re-classification in MI patients. In addition, use of these novel equations may have an impact on assessing potency of hypolipidemic therapy use in secondary prevention as far as succeeding lipid treatment goals in MI patients.

Association of Bempedoic Acid Administration With Atherogenic Lipid Levels in Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials of Patients With Hypercholesterolemia

Additional lipid-lowering therapy options are needed for patients who cannot achieve sufficient decreases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels using statins alone or for those who are statin intolerant. To conduct a pooled analysis of phase 3 randomized clinical trials of bempedoic acid vs placebo. This analysis pooled data from 4 double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials conducted from 2016 to 2018. Patients were enrolled in North America and Europe. Eligibility criteria included hypercholesterolemia while receiving stable lipid-lowering therapy and high cardiovascular risk or hypercholesterolemia and statin intolerance. Patients were randomized 2:1 to bempedoic acid, 180 mg (n = 2425), or placebo (n = 1198) once daily for 12 to 52 weeks. Primary efficacy end point was percentage change from baseline in LDL-C level at week 12 in the intention-to-treat population. Patients were parsed into 2 groups according to enrollment criteria: (1) patients with hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) or with both and receiving statins and (2) patients with hypercholesterolemia who were statin intolerant receiving maximally tolerated statins. In this analysis of 3623 patients, the overall mean (SD) patient age was 65.5 (9.2) years (similar in both pools). Among patients with ASCVD or HeFH or both, the mean (SD) baseline LDL-C level was 107.6 (32.7) mg/dL. At week 12, the LDL-C level percentage change from baseline was -16.0% with bempedoic acid vs 1.8% with placebo (difference, -17.8%; 95% CI, -19.5% to -16.0%; P < .001). Patients with statin intolerance had a mean (SD) baseline LDL-C level of 144.4 (38.8) mg/dL. The percentage changes in LDL-C levels at week 12 were -23.0% in the bempedoic acid group and 1.5% in the placebo group (difference, -24.5%; 95% CI, -27.8% to -21.1%; P < .001). The decrease in LDL-C levels with bempedoic acid was sustained during long-term follow-up in both pools (patients with ASCVD or HeFH or both receiving a maximally tolerated statin, difference of -12.7% at week 52; patients with statin intolerance, difference of -22.2% at week 24). Decreases in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels were greater with bempedoic acid vs placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events associated more frequently with bempedoic acid than with placebo included increased blood uric acid level (2.1% vs 0.5%), gout (1.4% vs 0.4%), decreased glomerular filtration rate (0.7% vs <0.1%), and increased levels of hepatic enzymes (2.8% vs 1.3%). Bempedoic acid added to maximally tolerated statins, including moderate- or high-intensity statins or no background statin, was associated with decreased LDL-C levels vs placebo in patients with hypercholesterolemia with an acceptable safety profile. As a nonstatin adjunct or statin alternative, bempedoic acid has potential for use in a broad spectrum of patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02666664, NCT02991118, NCT03001076, and NCT02988115.

Age-Dependent Efficacy of Ezetimibe for Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Reduction in Japanese Patients with or without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Ezetimibe reduces cardiovascular risk by lowering the levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). However, there is limited information regarding the factors associated with ezetimibe-mediated LDL-C reduction. We investigated the factors associated with LDL-C reduction after ezetimibe administration in Japanese patients with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This single-center retrospective observational study enrolled a total of 266 consecutive ezetimibe-naïve patients, of which 154 were excluded because of either switching from statin or fenofibrate to ezetimibe (n = 52) or ezetimibe discontinuation (n = 102). Finally, 112 patients were eligible for analysis. To identify the factors influencing LDL-C levels, univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed after 52 weeks of ezetimibe treatment. Overall, advanced age, T2DM, and high baseline LDL-C were significantly associated with a greater decrease in LDL-C levels. In the non-T2DM group, advanced age and high baseline LDL-C were associated with greater decrease in LDL-C levels. In the T2DM group, baseline LDL-C was the only factor that influenced the change in LDL-C levels. Advanced age was significantly associated with higher LDL-C reduction in non-T2DM patients, but not in T2DM patients. Ezetimibe use might be beneficial in older patients without T2DM. The lack of association between age and the LDL-C lowering effect by ezetimibe in patients with T2DM may be due to yet unknown mechanism except low statistical power.

Effects of Statin Plus Ezetimibe on Coronary Plaques in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Sub-Analysis of PRECISE-IVUS Trial.

Aim: Coronary plaque regression is weak in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). We evaluated whether dual lipid-lowering therapy (DLLT) with ezetimibe and atorvastatin attenuates coronary plaques in ACS patients with DM.Methods: The prospective, randomized controlled, multicenter PRECISE-IVUS (Plaque Regression with Cholesterol Absorption Inhibitor or Synthesis Inhibitor Evaluated by Intravascular Ultrasound) trial assigned 246 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention to DLLT or atorvastatin monotherapy and evaluated IVUS-derived changes in percent atheroma volume (ΔPAV), at baseline and 9–12-month follow-up, in 126 ACS cases, including 25 DM patients. The atorvastatin dose was up-titrated to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) < 70 mg/dL.Results: In DM patients, the monotherapy group (n = 13) and the DLLT group (n = 12) showed a similar prevalence of coronary risks and baseline lipid profiles. During the study, the change in LDL-C level was similar between DM and non-DM patients. Compared with non-DM patients, DM patients showed weaker regression of ΔPAV by DLLT than those who underwent monotherapy (DM: −2.77 ± 3.47% vs. −0.77 ± 2.51%, P = 0.11; non-DM: −2.01 ± 3.36% vs. −0.08 ± 2.66%, P = 0.008). The change in LDL-C level was not correlated with ΔPAV in non-DM patients, but there was significant correlation between the change in LDL-C level and ΔPAV in DM patients (r = 0.52, P = 0.008).Conclusions: ACS patients with DM showed weaker coronary plaque regression than their counterparts. A significant correlation between the change in LDL-C level and ΔPAV in DM patients suggested that more intensive lipid-lowering therapy is required in ACS patients with DM.

Two Phase 3 Trials of Inclisiran in Patients with Elevated LDL Cholesterol

BackgroundInclisiran inhibits hepatic synthesis of proprotein convertase subtilisin–kexin type 9. Previous studies suggest that inclisiran might provide sustained reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels with infrequent dosing.MethodsWe enrolled patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ORION-10 trial) and patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk equivalent (ORION-11 trial) who had elevated LDL cholesterol levels despite receiving statin therapy at the maximum tolerated dose. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either inclisiran (284 mg) or placebo, administered by subcutaneous injection on day 1, day 90, and every 6 months thereafter over a period of 540 days. The coprimary end points in each trial were the placebo-corrected percentage change in LDL cholesterol level from baseline to day 510 and the time-adjusted percentage change in LDL cholesterol level from baseline after day 90 and up to day 540.ResultsA total of 1561 and 1617 patients underwent randomization in the ORION-10 and ORION-11 trials, respectively. Mean (±SD) LDL cholesterol levels at baseline were 104.7±38.3 mg per deciliter (2.71±0.99 mmol per liter) and 105.5±39.1 mg per deciliter (2.73±1.01 mmol per liter), respectively. At day 510, inclisiran reduced LDL cholesterol levels by 52.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48.8 to 55.7) in the ORION-10 trial and by 49.9% (95% CI, 46.6 to 53.1) in the ORION-11 trial, with corresponding time-adjusted reductions of 53.8% (95% CI, 51.3 to 56.2) and 49.2% (95% CI, 46.8 to 51.6) (P<0.001 for all comparisons vs. placebo). Adverse events were generally similar in the inclisiran and placebo groups in each trial, although injection-site adverse events were more frequent with inclisiran than with placebo (2.6% vs. 0.9% in the ORION-10 trial and 4.7% vs. 0.5% in the ORION-11 trial); such reactions were generally mild, and none were severe or persistent.ConclusionsReductions in LDL cholesterol levels of approximately 50% were obtained with inclisiran, administered subcutaneously every 6 months. More injection-site adverse events occurred with inclisiran than with placebo. (Funded by the Medicines Company; ORION-10 and ORION-11 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03399370 and NCT03400800.)

Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Target Attainment in Patients With Established Cardiovascular Disease: Analysis of Routine Care Data.

BackgroundDirect feedback on quality of care is one of the key features of a learning health care system (LHS), enabling health care professionals to improve upon the routine clinical care of their patients during practice.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the potential of routine care data extracted from electronic health records (EHRs) in order to obtain reliable information on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) management in cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients referred to a tertiary care center.MethodsWe extracted all LDL-c measurements from the EHRs of patients with a history of CVD referred to the University Medical Center Utrecht. We assessed LDL-c target attainment at the time of referral and per year. In patients with multiple measurements, we analyzed LDL-c trajectories, truncated at 6 follow-up measurements. Lastly, we performed a logistic regression analysis to investigate factors associated with improvement of LDL-c at the next measurement.ResultsBetween February 2003 and December 2017, 250,749 LDL-c measurements were taken from 95,795 patients, of whom 23,932 had a history of CVD. At the time of referral, 51% of patients had not reached their LDL-c target. A large proportion of patients (55%) had no follow-up LDL-c measurements. Most of the patients with repeated measurements showed no change in LDL-c levels over time: the transition probability to remain in the same category was up to 0.84. Sequence clustering analysis showed more women (odds ratio 1.18, 95% CI 1.07-1.10) in the cluster with both most measurements off target and the most LDL-c measurements furthest from the target. Timing of drug prescription was difficult to determine from our data, limiting the interpretation of results regarding medication management.ConclusionsRoutine care data can be used to provide feedback on quality of care, such as LDL-c target attainment. These routine care data show high off-target prevalence and little change in LDL-c over time. Registrations of diagnosis; follow-up trajectory, including primary and secondary care; and medication use need to be improved in order to enhance usability of the EHR system for adequate feedback.