Change In Central Macular Thickness Research Articles

Clinical and Transcriptional Profiles Reveal the Treatment Effect of Adalimumab in Patients with Initial-Onset and Recurrent Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada Disease

ABSTRACT Purpose We aimed to evaluate adalimumab efficacy in patients with initial-onset or recurrent Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada (VKH) syndrome. Methods A retrospective clinical study was performed to examine the therapeutic effect of adalimumab in 22 VKH patients,16 with initial-onset and six with recurrent VKH. Another 22 patients with initial-onset VKH who did not receive adalimumab were included as controls. The main observational parameters included the central macular thickness (CMT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), anterior chamber cell grade (ACC), glucocorticoid dose (GCD), and the development of sunset glow fundus. MRNA sequencing was used to profile the tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α pathway in peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained from nine patients with initial-onset VKH disease, six patients with recurrent VKH, and eight healthy controls. Results In the initial-onset group, adalimumab therapy significantly improved the BCVA, CMT, SCT, and ACC. Furthermore, adalimumab significantly decreased GCD in patients with initial-onset. In patients with recurrent VKH, the SCT significantly improved after adalimumab treatment, but no significant changes in BCVA, CMT, and ACC were observed. All six patients experienced relapse during follow-up. The TNF-α pathway exhibited a significant increase in initial-onset VKH when compared with that in both healthy controls and recurrent patients. Conversely, it was suppressed in recurrent VKH when compared with that in the initial-onset or healthy control groups. Conclusions In patients with initial-onset VKH, adalimumab effectively reduces glucocorticoid dependence. However, adalimumab may not be effective for preventing relapse or providing long-term inflammation relief in patients with recurrent VKH.

Photocoagulation or sham laser in addition to conventional anti-VEGF therapy in macular edema associated with TelCaps due to diabetic macular edema or retinal vein occlusion (TalaDME): a study protocol for a multicentric, French, two-group, non-commercial, active-control, observer-masked, non-inferiority, randomized controlled clinical trial

BackgroundMacular edema (ME) results from hyperpermeability of retinal vessels, leading to chronic extravasation of plasma components into the retina and hence potentially severe visual acuity loss. Current standard of care consists in using intravitreal injections (IVI), which results in a significant medical and economic burden. During diabetic retinopathy (DR) or retinal vein occlusion (RVO), it has recently been shown that focal vascular anomalies (capillary macro-aneurysms, also termed TelCaps) for telangiectatic capillaries may play a central role in the onset, early recurrence, and/or persistence of ME. Since targeted photocoagulation of TelCaps may improve vision, identification, and photocoagulation of TelCaps, it may represent a way to improve management of ME.ObjectiveThe Targeted Laser in (Diabetic) Macular Edema (TalaDME) study aims to evaluate whether ICG-guided targeted laser (IGTL), in association with standard of care by IVI, allows reducing the number of injections during the first year of treatment compared with IVI only, while remaining non-inferior for visual acuity.MethodsTalaDME is a French, multicentric, two-arms, randomized, sham laser-controlled, double-masked trial evaluating the effect of photocoagulation of TelCaps combined to IVI in patients with ME associated with TelCaps. Patients with vision loss related to center involved ME secondary to RVO or DR and presenting TelCaps are eligible. Two hundred and seventy eyes of 270 patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to standard care, i.e., IVI of anti-VEGF solely (control group) or combined with IGTL therapy (experimental group). Stratification is done on the cause of ME (i.e., RVO versus diabetes). Anti-VEGF IVI are administered to both groups monthly for 3 months (loading dose) and then with a pro re nata regimen with a monthly follow-up for 12 months. The primary endpoint will be the number of IVI and the change in visual acuity from baseline to 12 months. Secondary endpoints will be the changes in central macular thickness, impact on quality of life, cost of treatment, and incremental cost-utility ratio in each groups.Key safetyRare but severe AE linked to the use of IVI and laser, and previously described, are expected. In the sham group, rescue laser photocoagulation may be administered by the unmasked investigator if deemed necessary at month 3.DiscussionThe best management of ME associated with TelCaps is debated, and there have been no randomized study designed to answer this question. Given the fact that TelCaps may affect 30 to 60% of patients with chronic ME due to DR or RVO, a large number of patients could benefit from a specific management of TelCaps. TalaDME aims to establish the clinical and medico-economic benefits of additional targeted laser. The results of TalaDME may raise new recommendations for managing ME and impact healthcare costs.Trial registrationEudraCT: 2018-A00800-55/ NCT03751501. Registration date: Nov. 23, 2018.

DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT VERSUS TOPICAL CARBONIC ANHYDRASE INHIBITORS IN PATIENTS WITH BILATERAL RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA-RELATED CYSTOID MACULAR EDEMA: A Prospective, Paired-Eye Pilot Study.

To compare within-subject efficacy and safety of intravitreal dexamethasone implant and topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors in the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa-related cystoid macular edema. Patients with bilateral retinitis pigmentosa-related cystoid macular edema were treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implant in one eye and topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors in the contralateral eye. The primary endpoint was a change in central macular thickness. Secondary endpoints were changes in best-corrected visual acuity and microperimetric central retinal sensitivity. Intraocular pressure and other ocular complications were evaluated for safety assessment. Nine patients were recruited for this 12-month follow-up study. Central macular thickness was significantly lower in intravitreal dexamethasone implant-treated eyes than in topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors-treated eyes at Months 1 and 7, whereas mean best-corrected visual acuity was better in eyes treated with topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors at Month 12 (borderline significant P = 0.0510). There was no difference in microperimetric sensitivity between the two treatments. Three patients developed ocular hypertension after intravitreal dexamethasone implant. Intravitreal dexamethasone implant showed an effect on the contralateral eye in five of nine patients. Intravitreal dexamethasone implant was more effective than topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors in reducing retinitis pigmentosa-related cystoid macular edema 1 month after treatment. Corticosteroids can play a key role in the management of retinitis pigmentosa-related cystoid macular edema; however, their routes, timing, and modes of administration should be further explored.

Aflibercept vs. dexamethasone implant for recalcitrant diabetic macular edema in pseudophakic eyes - 1-year outcomes from a quazi-randomized study in India.

To assess the safety and efficacy of intravitreal Aflibercept (IVA) versus dexamethasone (DEX) implant for treating recalcitrant diabetic macular edema (DME) in pseudophakic eyes at 1-year follow-up. Retrospective comparative case series. Data of all patients diagnosed with DME between January 2019 and December 2021, who underwent 4-monthly doses of intravitreal ranibizumab but had persistent DME [central macular thickness (CMT) within 10% of baseline value] were extracted from a computerized database. Of these, only pseudophakic eyes that underwent either IVA or DEX implant and had at least 1-year follow-up were included for analysis. DEX implant was preferred before December 2020 and IVA after this time point. In the IVA group, patients were followed up every month while DEX were followed at least every 3 months. Reinjections were considered when vision dropped by at least 1 Snellen's line or CMT increased by at least 10% from the previous visit in both groups. Comparison of change in vision and CMT at 1-year follow-up in DEX versus IVA groups. Eighty-four eyes of 84 patients aged 54.4 + 4.4 years were included, 39 (46%) received DEX and 45 (54%) received IVA. Groups were comparable for baseline vision and CMT. Vision improved equally in both groups from 0.83 + 0.15 logMAR to 0.52 + 0.10 logMAR at 3 months (P < 0.01) and then stabilized till 1 year. However, eyes in the IVA group were 6.5 times more likely (Odds ratio = 6.45, 95% CI = 1.3 - 31.9) to achieve >3-line improvement in vision. The CMT reduction was also comparable between groups (-169 + 51 in DEX vs. -174 + 49 in IVA, P = 0.67). More eyes in the IVA group required >3 injections (91% vs. 69% in DEX, P = 0.01). The IOP was significantly higher at 6 and 9 months in the DEX group and 5 eyes (13%) required IOP lowering medications. In pseudophakic eyes with recalcitrant DME not responding to ranibizumab, switching to IVA or DEX implant results in equal visual improvement and CMT reduction. Though >3-line improvement occurs more frequently with IVA, this comes at the expense of a greater number of injections and follow-up visits.

Efficacy of Brolucizumab in Polyp Regression of Treatment-Naïve Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy and Its Effect on One-Year Treatment Outcome.

To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal brolucizumab in polyp regression of treatment-naïve polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) patients and its effect on one-year treatment outcome. Medical records of 31 treatment-naïve PCV patients, who received three monthly intravitreal brolucizumab injections followed by as-needed injections for at least a year, were retrospectively reviewed. Visual and anatomical outcomes were evaluated at 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month. Complete polyp regression rate and percentage change of vascular lesion and polyp area were evaluated after three monthly injections of brolucizumab. The effect of complete polyp regression and the impact of vascular lesion and polyp reduction rate on one-year treatment outcome were also evaluated. Additionally, the incidence of brolucizumab-related intraocular inflammation (IOI) and its clinical course were examined. In terms of visual outcome, best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA) significantly improved after 12 month follow-up (p<0.001). In terms of anatomical outcome, central macular thickness(CMT) and central choroidal thickness(CCT) significantly decreased after 12 month follow-up (p<0.001). Complete polyp regression was observed in 74.2% (23/31) after three monthly injections. Group with complete polyp regression had a higher rate of achieving dry macula at 3-month(p=0.026) and fewer number of injections(p<0.001) compared to the group without complete polyp regression. Higher polyp reduction rate was significantly associated with higher CMT change from baseline at 3-month (p=0.048) while higher vascular lesion reduction rate was significantly associated with higher CMT change from baseline at 12-month(p=0.031) and fewer number of injections(p=0.012). Brolucizumab related IOI occurred in one eye (1/31, 3.2%). Intravitreal brolucizumab injection effectively improved visual and anatomical outcomes and achieved significant polyp regression in treatment-naïve PCV patients. Complete polyp regression and the reduction rate of vascular lesion size and polyp size after loading injection significantly influence the treatment outcome of PCV patients. However, careful monitoring and preoperative warning is warranted due to occurrence of brolucizumab-related IOI.

Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of Sun's Ranibizumab Biosimilar in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Phase 3, Double-Blind Comparative Study.

The study aimed to evaluate comparability in terms of efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of Sun's ranibizumab biosimilar with reference ranibizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). This prospective, randomised, double-blind, two-group, parallel-arm, multicentre, phase 3 comparative study included patients with nAMD ≥ 50years, randomised (in a 2:1 ratio) in a double-blind manner to receive 0.5mg (0.05mL) intravitreal injection of either Sun's ranibizumab or reference ranibizumab in the study eye every 4weeks until week 16 (total of four doses). Primary endpoint results demonstrated equivalence in the proportion of patients who lost fewer than 15 letters from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) to the end of week16 (99% of patients in Sun's ranibizumab and 100% in reference ranibizumab; p > 0.9999), with the proportional difference (90% confidence interval) at -1% (-2.51, +0.61) lying within a pre-specified equivalence margin. Visual acuity improved by 15 or more letters in 43% of Sun's ranibizumab group and 37% of the reference ranibizumab group (p = 0.4267). The mean increase in BCVA was 15.7 letters in Sun's ranibizumab group and 14.6 letters in the reference ranibizumab group (p < 0.001 within both groups and p = 0.5275 between groups). The mean change in central macular thickness was comparable between groups (p = 0.7946). Anti-ranibizumab antibodies were found in one patient of the reference ranibizumab group, while neutralising antibodies were not found in any patients. Both products were well tolerated. Sun's ranibizumab biosimilar is found to be therapeutically equivalent to reference ranibizumab in patients with nAMD. There were no additional safety or immunogenicity concerns. CTRI/2020/09/027629, registered on 07 September 2020.

The Efficacy of Adalimumab in Children with Chronic Non-infectious Posterior Uveitis and Panuveitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab in pediatric patients with chronic non-infectious posterior uveitis and panuveitis (not associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis). The medical records of children (< 18years old) with chronic non-infectious posterior uveitis and panuveitis were collected and analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. Children were allocated to a conventional adalimumab-free treatment (CT) or adalimumab (ADA) group based on whether they additionally received adalimumab. In total, 69 children (138 eyes) were included, with 21 (42 eyes) and 48 (96 eyes) in the CT and ADA groups, respectively. During the average follow-up period of 24months, the improvement in all ocular parameters (best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular inflammation, fluorescein angiography score) was better in the ADA group than in the CT group, except for changes in central macular thickness, which did not significantly differ between the groups. The mean time of first alleviation, which was after 1.03 ± 0.12months of therapy, was earlier in the ADA group than in the CT group (2.30 ± 0.46months). In the ADA group, 90.6% of children had remission within 3months, and 47.9% had no relapse during follow-up. Cough and cold were the most common adverse events in the ADA group; however, the number of adverse events was similar between both the groups. Adalimumab was effective in the treatment of chronic noninfectious posterior uveitis and panuveitis in pediatric patients, and disease inactivity was accomplished in the majority of the patients, thereby improving visual outcomes and maintaining disease stability. Adverse events were limited and tolerable.

Short-Term Effects of Adding Topical Ketorolac to Intravitreal Bevacizumab in Diabetic Macular Edema: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial.

To evaluate the short-term additive effects of topical ketorolac to intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) in the management of center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME). In a randomized double-masked placebo-controlled crossover clinical trial, eyes with CI-DME and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between (20/40) and (20/400) were included. These eyes should have had at least one intravitreal anti-VEGF injection in the preceding two months. They were randomized into two groups; while both groups received two IVB injections with a six-week interval, one group received topical ketorolac every 6 hr in the first interval and artificial tears every 6 hr as a placebo in the second interval and the other group received the same medications using a crossover method. The main outcome measures were changes in BCVA and central macular thickness (CMT). Fifty-seven eyes of 35 patients with CI-DME were included in the study. The mean BCVA improvement was -0.09 0.47 logMAR in the periods of receiving ketorolac and -0.03 0.12 logMAR in the periods of placebo treatment, respectively (P = 0.99). Corresponding changes in CMT were -13.1 170.1 and +11.7 157.7 µm in the ketorolac and placebo periods, respectively (P = 0.322). The treatment effect was not statistically significant regarding both BCVA and CMT changes. Statistical analysis also disclosed that the carryover effect was insignificant for BCVA and CMT. Although the period effect was not significant for BCVA, it was at a meaningful level for CMT changes (P = 0.012). This crossover clinical trial demonstrated that in the course of DME treatment with IVB injections, topical ketorolac did not have any additive beneficial effect at least during a six-week period.

Efficacy of anti-VEGF monotherapy versus anti-VEGF therapy with subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) in the management of diabetic macular oedema (DMO): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Intravitreal injection anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (IVI anti-VEGF) therapy serves as the primary treatment for centre involving diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Conventional laser therapy (CLT) adjunct has proven beneficial; however, it is not widely used due to significant risks of retinal scarring. Subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) therapy has, however, emerged as a comparable alternative to combination therapy, offering a distinct advantage by mitigating the risk of retinal scarring. A search of six databases was conducted. A meta-analysis of mean differences was performed including subgroup analyses where appropriate. Primary outcome was the number of injections at 12-14months; secondary outcomes were changes in central macular thickness (CMT) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6-8months and 12-14months. A total of ten papers including six randomised clinical trials and four retrospective clinical studies were included in our study, capturing 563 eyes of 478 patients. Overall, the risk of bias was moderate for these studies. Significantly fewer anti-VEGF therapy injections were administered in the combination therapy versus anti-VEGF monotherapy patients at 12-14months who had poor visual acuity (6/18 Snellen or worse) at baseline, mean difference - 2.25 (95% CI; - 3.35, - 1.15; p < 0.05). Combination therapy was not associated with significantly fewer intravitreal injections in patients with a higher visual acuity (6/15 Snellen or better) at baseline. Our analysis also showed significant improvements to both BCVA and CMT were reached at 6 - 8month post-baseline at the 95% confidence intervals: - 1.13 (- 2.09, - 0.16) and - 4.04 (- 7.59, - 0.50). These improvements remained statistically significant at 12-14months: - 0.94 (- 1.67, - 0.20) and - 1.92 (- 3.52, - 0.32) respectively with combination therapy. Our findings demonstrate that combination therapy (SML + IVI anti-VEGF) is associated with fewer intravitreal injections. We report a better BCVA and a reduction in CMT at 6 and 12months from baseline with combination treatment compared to the IVI anti-VEGF monotherapy comparator. SML is a proven non-scarring cost-effective therapy for DMO that should be readily available in the medical retinal therapy as it may reduce the burden of care.

Five-year changes in macular thickness in the elderly population: A cohort study.

The aim of this study is to determine the 5-year changes in macular thickness and related factors. Data were from the second (2014) and third (2019) phases of the Shahroud Eye Cohort Study. Examinations included measurement of uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity, non-cycloplegic autorefraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and funduscopy. Participants underwent Cirrus HD-OCT 4000 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). The 5-year changes (95% confidence interval) of central and overall macular thicknesses were - 3.48 ± 8.16 μ (-3.92, -3.03) and - 0.79 ± 4.06 μ (-1.03, -0.54), respectively. The median and IQR of 5-year changes in the central subfield thickness were -3 and 10, although they were 0 and 5 in the overall macular thickness, respectively. Multiple regression model showed the central macular thickness (CMT) decreased with a U-shape pattern with increasing age. The 5-year changes in CMT were significantly lower in females compared to males β = -1.55; (-2.78, -0.32) and in smokers compared to non-smokers β = -1.92; (-3.55, -0.28). Moreover, higher body mass index β = -0.12; (-0.22, -0.02) and CMT at baseline β = -0.08; (-0.10, -0.06) were significantly associated with lower CMT changes. The average 5-year changes in overall macular thickness showed a non-linear decrease with age and was significantly higher in females β = 0.93; (0.4, 1.43). These changes were directly related to the anterior chamber depth β = 0.87; (0.10, 1.64) in the baseline. The macular thickness decreased slightly after 5 years; however, this change is not clinically significant. Demographic factors such as age and sex and refractive errors were significantly related to macular thickness changes.

Is Intravitreal Injection of Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Effective for the Treatment of Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema in Patients With Posterior Vitreous Detachment?

To determine whether intravitreal injection of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rTPA) is effective for the treatment of refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) in patients who already had posterior vitreous detachment (PVD). It is a retrospective chart review of the patients with refractory DME and PVD. The efficacy of intravitreal injection of rTPA was assessed based on the changes in central macular thickness (CMT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in these patients. Nine eyes of nine patients as the study group and 14 eyes of the 14 patients as the control group were examined. Before the injections, the mean CMT was 470.0± 107.6 in the study group, compared to 536.2± 150.5 in the control group, with no statistical significance (p=0.403). The statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in the mean changes in CMT from baseline to one and three months after injections between the study and control groups (p=0.439, p=0.781, respectively). Likewise, no statistically significant disparities were observed in the mean pre-injection BCVA between the study group (0.877± 0.349) and the control group (0.950± 0.300) (p=0.415). Additionally, after three months of injection, there were no significant changes in the mean BCVA of the study group (0.844± 0.304) and the control group (0.864± 0.253) (p=0.512). This study showed that rTPA has no effect on changes in CMT and BCVA in patients who had refractory DME and PVD at the same time. This may suggest that the improvement in CMT in previous studies may be due to the induction of PVD.

Comparison of quantification of intraretinal hard exudates between optical coherence tomography en face image versus fundus photography.

To compare the quantification of intraretinal hard exudate (HE) using en face optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus photography. Consecutive en face images and corresponding fundus photographs from 13 eyes of 10 patients with macular edema associated with diabetic retinopathy or Coats' disease were analyzed using the machine-learning-based image analysis tool, "ilastik." The overall measured HE area was greater with en face images than with fundus photos (en face: 0.49 ± 0.35 mm2 vs. fundus photo: 0.34 ± 0.34 mm2, P < 0.001). However, there was an excellent correlation between the two measurements (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.844). There was a negative correlation between HE area and central macular thickness (CMT) (r = -0.292, P = 0.001). However, HE area showed a positive correlation with CMT in the previous several months, especially in eyes treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy (CMT 3 months before: r = 0.349, P = 0.001; CMT 4 months before: r = 0.287, P = 0.012). Intraretinal HE can be reliably quantified from either en face OCT images or fundus photography with the aid of an interactive machine learning-based image analysis tool. HE area changes lagged several months behind CMT changes, especially in eyes treated with anti-VEGF injections.

25-GAUGE VERSUS 27-GAUGE VITRECTOMY FOR MANAGEMENT OF VITREORETINAL DISEASES: A Large Prospective Randomized Trial.

To compare the safety and performance clinical outcomes of the 27-gauge (G) two-dimensional cutting vitrectomy probe versus a standard 25-G probe for retinal procedures. In this large randomized prospective study, all candidates for epiretinal membrane or macular hole surgery were randomized to the 27-G group or 25-G group. Outcome measures included surgery time, changes in best-corrected distance visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and central macular thickness between baseline and 1-month and 3-month follow-up time points. Moreover, intraoperative and postoperative complications were evaluated as well as the rate of sutureless vitrectomy. A total of 463 patients were included in this study, 227 patients in the 27-G group and 236 patients in the 25-G group. A similar total surgery time was found between both groups ( P = 0.0911). Similar best-corrected distance visual acuity and central macular thickness changes were observed between baseline and the 1-month and 3-month follow-up visits. No significant differences were reported in intraoperative and postoperative complications rates. The rate of sutureless vitrectomy was 96.5% for the 27-G group and 91.1% for the 25-G group ( P = 0.0170). These results suggest that 27-G vitrectomy probe is similar to 25-G probe in surgery time and complications, while decreasing the need for vitrectomy sutures.

Role of Novel Inflammatory Factors in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema.

Background and Objectives: To investigate associations among the aqueous humor levels of novel inflammatory factors, including FMS-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (Flt-3L), fractalkine, CXC chemokine ligand 16 (CXCL-16), and endocan-1; the severity of macular edema in central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO); and the prognosis of CRVO with macular edema after antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. Materials and Methods: Aqueous humor was obtained during anti-VEGF treatment with intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IRI) in patients with CRVO and macular edema (n = 19) and during cataract surgery in patients with cataracts (controls, n = 20), and the levels of VEGF and novel inflammatory factors were measured. Macular edema was evaluated by central macular thickness (CMT) and neurosensory retinal thickness (TNeuro), and improvement was evaluated by calculating the percentage change in CMT and TNeuro from before to 1 month after IRI. Results: The levels of VEGF and the novel inflammatory factors were significantly higher in the CRVO group, and the levels of Flt-3L, CXCL-16, and endocan-1 were significantly correlated with each other and with the aqueous flare value. Baseline levels of Flt-3L, CXCL-16, and endocan-1 had a significantly negative correlation with the change in CMT, and the baseline level of CXCL-16 was significantly negatively correlated with the change in TNeuro. Conclusions: Relations among novel inflammatory factors should be further investigated. These findings may help improve understanding of macular edema in CRVO patients and aid the development of new treatments targeting novel inflammatory factors.

Evaluation of the First-Dose Anti-VEGF Anatomical Response in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Patients: Correlation with the Third-Dose Response and Risk Factor Analysis.

The aims of the study were to investigate whether first-dose efficacy can predict third-dose anatomical response and analyze the risk factors for first-dose response of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) patients. We retrospectively reviewed patients' medical records from 27 centers of China PCV Research Alliance. PCV patients treated with intravitreal injections of conbercept (IVC) based on the 3+ pro re nata regimen (three initial monthly injections, followed by injections as needed) with complete 3-month injection data were included. Response correlations, risk factor associations, changes in central macular thickness (CMT) or best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and number of injections in the first year of follow-up were evaluated separately in the pachy-PCV and non-pachy-PCV phenotypes. Overall, 165 eligible patients were included. There was a significant correlation between first-dose and third-dose anatomical response in pachy-PCV or non-pachy-PCV patients (rs = 0.611, p &lt; 0.001; rs = 0.638, p &lt; 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed associations of good first-dose anatomical response in pachy-PCV patients with baseline CMT with a predicted area under the curve (AUC) of 0.847, while a good response in non-pachy-PCV patients was associated with baseline BCVA, baseline CMT, pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height, higher proportion of intraretinal fluid, and lower PED minimum diameter with a predicted AUC of 0.940. CMT in the good first-dose response group was significantly decreased from baseline at all first-year follow-up visits in both groups (p &lt; 0.001), and mean BCVA was improved in the good versus poor first-dose anatomical response group (5.4 vs. 1.6 ETDRS letters in pachy-PCV, 10.6 vs. 7.4 letters in non-pachy-PCV) after the third injection. No significant difference was observed in the number of injections in the first year of follow-up between different response groups. In PCV patients receiving IVC, the first- and third-dose responses are significantly correlated, and different factors influence the first-dose response in different subtypes of PCV.

The effect of nondamaging subthreshold laser therapy in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.

To evaluate the efficacy of nondamaging subthreshold laser therapy in Korean patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSC). This retrospective interventional case series included 31 patients (31 eyes) with cCSC who underwent nondamaging laser therapy using Endpoint Management (EpM) software. Since a barely visible burn of the test spot was defined as 100% pulse energy, 30% pulse energy with a 200-μm spot was titrated to treat the macular area based on EpM settings. A 30% pulse laser with a spacing of 0.25-beam diameter was applied to cover the macular area where hyperfluorescent leaks were observed on fluorescein angiography. Changes in central macular thickness (CMT), subretinal fluid (SRF) height, subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCT), and logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were measured at baseline and after 3 and 6months. If the subretinal fluid persisted for 3months, retreatment was performed. At 6months post-treatment, the complete SRF resolution rate was 48.39% (15/31 eyes), and the partial SRF resolution rate was 12.90% (4/31 eyes). The change in mean BCVA (logMAR) was not significant (0.31 ± 0.29 at the baseline and 0.31 ± 0.40 at month 6) (p = 0.943). At the baseline, the mean CMT (μm) decreased from 350.74 ± 112.76 at baseline to 239.71 ± 130.25 at month 6 (p < 0.001), and the mean SRF height (μm) decreased from 193.16 ± 90.69 at baseline to 70.58 ± 100.00 at month 6 (p < 0.001). However, the change in SCT was not statistically significant (p = 0.516). In 15 patients who were retreated at month 3, the mean SRF height (μm) decreased significantly from 144.67 ± 74.01 at month 3 to 77.13 ± 63.77 at month 6 (p = 0.002). No side effects associated with laser therapy were observed during the 6-month follow-up. Nondamaging laser therapy with a modified macular treatment was effective in reducing CMT and SRF and showed favorable visual and anatomical outcomes in patients with cCSC.

Development of high-performance point-of-care aqueous VEGF detection system and proof-of-concept validation in RVO patients.

To develop a sensitive point-of-care testing (POCT) aqueous vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) detection system, and assess its role for predicting the response to anti-VEGF treatment in macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO-ME) patients. An automatic point-of-care aqueous humor Magnetic Particle Chemiluminescence Enzyme Immuno-Assay (MPCLEIA) VEGF detection system was developed. The predictive values of aqueous cytokine levels, in combination with imaging parameters, on anatomical treatment response (ATR, the relative central macular thickness change [ΔCMT/bl-CMT]) were analyzed. The automatic MPCLEIA system was able to provide results in 45 min with only 20 μL sample. Among the 57eyes with available pre- and post-treatment evaluation, ATR significantly correlated with levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and VEGF measured by Luminex xMAP platform, and VEGF measured by MPCLEIA. Optimal cut-off values for these biomarkers were 13.26 ng/L, 23.57 ng/L, 1,110.12 ng/L, 105.52 ng/L, and 85.39 ng/L, respectively. Univariate analysis showed significant associations between ATR category (good response if ATR≤-25 % or poor response otherwise) and IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, VEGF-xMAP, and VEGF-MPCLEIA (p<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that ATR category was significantly associated with aqueous VEGF-MPCLEIA (p=0.006) and baseline(bl)-CMT (p=0.008). Receiver operating characteristics analysis yielded an AUC of 0.959 for the regression model combining VEGF-MPCLEIA and bl-CMT, for predicting ATR category. Our novel MPCLEIA-based automatic VEGF detection system enables accurate POCT of aqueous VEGF, which shows promise in predicting the treatment response of RVO-ME to anti-VEGF agents when combined with bl-CMT.

Clinical Research of Lupus Retinopathy: Quantitative Analysis of Retinal Vessels by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Lupus retinopathy, an ocular manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), is the major pathology attributed to retinal vasculopathy. Our study is to analyze the changes in retinal vessels in patients with SLE by optical coherence tomography angiography. A total of 61 SLE patients without obvious retinal manifestation and 71 healthy people were included. The SLE patients were further divided into a lupus nephritis (LN) group and a non-LN group. The changes in central macular thickness (CMT) and the retinal vessel densities were compared between the two groups, and the correlation between retinal vascular changes and disease activity was analyzed. Compared with healthy control, the CMT and the retinal vascular densities in both superficial and deep retina were decreased significantly in SLE patients. There was no significant difference in retinal vascular densities between LN groups and non-LN groups. The CMT and retinal vessel densities were decreased in SLE patients without clinical manifestations, which might serve as a sensitive biomarker for early changes of lupus retinopathy in SLE patients.

Smoking and short-term response to intravitreal anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor injections in neovascular age-related macular degeneration

To evaluate the role of smoking status on the response to three monthly intravitreal anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (anti-VEGF) injections in treatment-naive neovascular AMD (nAMD) patients. We conducted a single-center, retrospective, case-control cohort study in Belgium. Intravitreal treatment (IVT) was performed in 147 eyes of 131 patients, including 92 females (70%). Mean age at the time of the first IVT was 79±9 years. Seventeen patients (13%) were actively smoking at the time of the anti-VEGF IVT. On average, active smokers were 11 years younger than non-smokers when starting IVT treatment. They also showed more frequent subretinal fluid than non-smokers (94% vs. 65%). Mann-Whitney analyses comparing change in central macular thickness and change in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity between active smokers and non-smokers showed no significant difference in treatment response between both groups. Likewise, no significant difference was found when comparing treatment response between patients with less than 10 pack-years (PY) (including never-smokers) and patients with over 10 PY. In a binary logistic regression model, male patients responded worse to anti-VEGF IVT than their female counterparts, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.27 for good response. This was the only statistically significant predictor of treatment response. Our study failed to demonstrate an effect of smoking on the short-term treatment response to anti-VEGF in nAMD.

Efficacy and safety of pan retinal photocoagulation combined with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents for high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

High-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (HR-PDR) is the advanced stage of diabetic retinopathy progression with poor prior treatment efficacy and high rates of blindness. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of pan retinal photocoagulation (PRP) combined with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (aVEGF) (PRP + aVEGF) versus PRP monotherapy in HR-PDR patients. A thorough search was performed through PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochran Library from inception to December 18, 2022. Outcome measures included change in central macular thickness, best-corrected visual acuity, fluorescein angiography, incidence of undergoing vitrectomy, and adverse events during the follow-up period. Eight studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 2 retrospective studies) with 375 eyes were included in this meta-analysis. There were no obvious differences in the changes of best-corrected visual acuity and fluorescein angiography between the PRP + aVEGF and PRP monotherapy groups. However, PRP + aVEGF group had a significant reduction in the change of central macula thickness (standard mean deviations = -1.44, 95%CI = -2.55 to -0.32, P = .01) and the rate of undergoing vitrectomy (odds ratio = 0.20, 95%CI = 0.05-0.83, P = .01). Additionally, the risks of vitreous hemorrhage and other complications were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Our meta-analysis indicated that PRP + aVEGF might have potential benefits in the treatment of HR-PDR patients. However, given several limitations of this study, more research is needed to confirm our findings.