Changes In Bone Resorption Markers Research Articles

Impact of dairy supplementation on bone acquisition in children's limbs: a 12-month cluster-randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis.

This study evaluated the impact of dairy supplementation on bone acquisition in children's limbs through a cluster-randomized controlled trial and a meta-analysis. The trial involved 315 children (4-6year) from Northwest China, randomized to receive either 390ml of milk daily (n = 215) or 20-30g of bread (n = 100) over 12months. We primarily assessed bone mineral density (BMD) and content (BMC) changes at the limbs, alongside bone-related biomarkers, measured at baseline, the 6th and 12th months. The meta-analysis aggregated BMD or BMC changes in the forearm/legs/calcaneus from published randomized trials involving children aged 3-18years supplemented with dairy foods (vs. control group). Of 278 completed the trial, intention-to-treat analysis revealed significant increases in BMD (4.05% and 7.31%) and BMC (4.69% and 7.34%) in the left forearm at the 6th and 12th months in the milk group compared to controls (P < 0.001). The calcaneus showed notable improvements in BMD (2.01%) and BMC (1.87%) at 6months but not at 12months. Additionally, milk supplementation was associated with beneficial changes in bone resorption markers, parathyroid hormone (- 12.70%), insulin-like growth factor 1 (6.69%), and the calcium-to-phosphorus ratio (2.22%) (all P < 0.05). The meta-analysis, encompassing 894 children, indicated that dairy supplementation significantly increased BMD (SMD, 0.629; 95%CI: 0.275, 0.983) and BMC (SMD, 0.616; 95%CI: 0.380, 0.851) (P < 0.05) in the arms, but not in the legs (P > 0.05). Milk supplementation significantly improves bone health in children's forearms, underscoring its potential as a strategic dietary intervention for bone development. Trial registration NCT05074836.

Effect of vitamin D supplementation or fortification on bone turnover markers in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vitamin D is a vital indicator of musculoskeletal health, as it plays an important role through the regulation of bone and mineral metabolism. This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the effects of vitamin D supplementation/fortification on bone turnover markers in women. All human randomised clinical trials reported changes in bone resorption markers (serum C-terminal telopeptide of type-I collagen (sCTX) and urinary type I collagen cross-linked N-telopeptide (uNTX)) or bone formation factors (osteocalcin (OC), bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP) and procollagen type-1 intact N-terminal propeptide (P1NP)) following vitamin D administration in women (aged ≥ 18 years) were considered. Mean differences (MD) and their respective 95 % CI were calculated based on fixed or random effects models according to the heterogeneity status. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression models, sensitivity analysis, risk of bias, publication bias and the quality of the included studies were also evaluated. We found that vitamin D supplementation had considerable effect on sCTX (MD: -0·038, n 22) and OC (MD: -0·610, n 24) with high heterogeneity and uNTX (MD: -8·188, n 6) without heterogeneity. Our results showed that age, sample size, dose, duration, baseline vitamin D level, study region and quality of studies might be sources of heterogeneity in this meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis also revealed significant reductions in P1NP level in dose less than 600 μg/d and larger study sample size (>100 participants). Moreover, no significant change was found in BALP level. Vitamin D supplementation/fortification significantly reduced bone resorption markers in women. However, results were inconsistent for bone formation markers.

Effects of Adding Intravenous Pamidronate to Ongoing Menopausal Hormone Therapy in Postmenopausal Korean Women with Low Bone Mineral Density.

ObjectivesWe evaluated the effects of adding intravenous pamidronate to ongoing menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) on bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal Korean women with low BMD.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 74 postmenopausal women who received MHT for at least 1 year and had a BMD T-score of less than −2.0. Maintaining the same MHT regimen, these women were divided into two groups: oral placebo group (n = 44) and a pamidronate group of patients with gastrointestinal discomfort (n = 30) who received 15–30 mg pamidronate intravenously every 3–12 months. BMD was reviewed at 12-month follow-up. Bone resorption markers in both groups, urinary deoxypyridinoline levels in the placebo group, and serum N-telopeptide of type I collagen in the pamidronate group were assessed at 6 and 12 months.ResultsAt baseline, the body mass index (BMI), duration of previous MHT, and femur neck (FN) BMD differed between the groups. Within-group analysis revealed that BMD of the lumbar spine (LS) and total hip (TH) significantly increased in the placebo group, whereas those of the LS, FN, and TH increased in the pamidronate group. The increase in BMD of LS was significantly greater in the pamidronate group, after adjusting for BMI and duration of previous MHT (mean change: 3.7% vs. 6.2%; P < 0.001). There were no changes in bone resorption markers in either group.ConclusionsAdding intravenous pamidronate to ongoing MHT for 12 months might increase LS BMD in postmenopausal Korean women with low BMD.

Pharmacokinetics of Zoledronic acid[once-yearly bisphosphonate(intravenous infusion)].

Zoledronic acid hydrate(zoledronic acid)is an osteoporosis therapeutic agent which shows the fracture suppression effect with once-yearly intravenous infusion. Although zoledronic acid is quickly disappeared from the blood after intravenous infusion, it is taken into the bone immediately and incorporated into the bone tissue. In addition, zoledronic acid shows the potent suppression effect on bone resorption by inhibiting farnesyl diphosphate synthase of the mevalonate pathway(FPPS)strongly. In vivo study, the single intravenous administration of zoledronic acid to the mature ovariectomized(OVX)rats demonstrated to suppress the decreasing bone strength dose-dependently in 32 weeks, corresponding to more than one year in human. Changes in bone resorption markers in the study of Japanese osteoporosis patients(ZONE Study)indicated that bone resorption inhibition action was maintained also over one year. The fracture suppression and increase of bone density with once-yealy administration was demonstrated in clinical trials in the osteoporosis patients in Japan and other countries, and zoledronic acid was currently approved for osteoporosis in September 2016 in Japan. Zoledronic acid is expected to contribute to the treatment of osteoporosis as a new bisphosphonate with once-yearly administration.

Time course of changes in bone resorption markers during pamidronate therapy in breast cancer patients with bone metastases

Time course of changes in bone resorption markers during pamidronate therapy in breast cancer patients with bone metastases

Pharmacological inhibition of PPARγ increases osteoblastogenesis and bone mass in male C57BL/6 mice

Infiltration of bone marrow with fat is a prevalent feature in people with age-related bone loss and osteoporosis, which correlates inversely with bone formation and positively with high expression levels of peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ). Inhibition of PPARγ thus represents a potential therapeutic approach for age-related bone loss. In this study, we examined the effect of PPARγ inhibition on bone in skeletally mature C57BL/6 male mice. Nine-month-old mice were treated with a PPARγ antagonist, bisphenol-A-diglycidyl ether (BADGE), alone or in combination with active vitamin D (1,25[OH](2) D(3) ) for 6 weeks. Micro-computed tomography and bone histomorphometry indicated that mice treated with either BADGE or BADGE + 1,25(OH)(2) D(3) had significantly increased bone volume and improved bone quality compared with vehicle-treated mice. This phenotype occurred in the absence of alterations in osteoclast number. Furthermore, the BADGE + 1,25(OH)(2) D(3) -treated mice exhibited higher levels of unmineralized osteoid. All of the treated groups showed a significant increase in circulating levels of bone formation markers without changes in bone resorption markers, while blood glucose, parathyroid hormone, and Ca(+) remained normal. Furthermore, treatment with BADGE induced higher levels of expression of vitamin D receptor within the bone marrow. Overall, treated mice showed higher levels of osteoblastogenesis and bone formation concomitant with decreased marrow adiposity and ex vivo adipogenesis. Taken together, these observations demonstrate that pharmacological inhibition of PPARγ may represent an effective anabolic therapy for osteoporosis in the near future.

Change in bone resorption markers in peri-implant sulcus fluid after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis

Change in bone resorption markers in peri-implant sulcus fluid after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis

The Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ Agonist Rosiglitazone Increases Bone Resorption in Women with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

In previous studies, with up to 16 weeks of exposure to rosiglitazone or pioglitazone, circulating markers of bone formation [procollagen I N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), osteocalcin, and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase] decreased but no change in bone resorption markers was found. We examined the effect of rosiglitazone on bone resorption and formation markers when used for 24 weeks. This post-hoc analysis of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial evaluated the effects of 6 months of rosiglitazone use versus placebo on circulating markers of bone turnover in 111 patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease or additional cardiac risk factors. The principal end points for analysis were changes in bone formation and resorption markers, measured by P1NP and carboxy-terminal cross-links (CTX), respectively. There were 111 subjects who completed the study and had baseline and 6-month data; mean age was 56, including 41% women and 67% nonwhite (50 black, 18 Hispanic, and six other), and subjects were evenly distributed between placebo and rosiglitazone groups. Women treated with rosiglitazone had higher CTX levels (0.43 ng/mL) than those who received placebo (0.23 ng/mL) (P = 0.007), with no significant differences in P1NP or OPG. Overall, in stratified analyses of men and in stratified analyses among different ethnicities, there were no statistically significant differences observed in CTX, P1NP, OPG, PTH, or 25-OHD between the treatment groups. Women taking rosiglitazone had higher circulating markers of bone resorption, which is contrary to prior studies of shorter duration, where the principal observation was a decrease in markers of bone formation.

Alendronate reduces osteoclast precursors in osteoporosis

This study evaluates the effect of alendronate on osteoclastogenesis, cytokine production, and bone resorption in postmenopausal women. We suggest that it acts on mature bone resorbing osteoclasts after 3 months of treatment, whereas, after 1 year, it diminishes their formation by reducing their precursors and serum RANKL. Osteoclasts are the target cells of bisphosphonates, though the most drug-sensitive steps of their formation and activity have not been determined. The present study evaluates the effect of alendronate on osteoclastogenesis, cytokine production, and bone resorption in postmenopausal women. The study was conducted on 35 osteoporotic women; 15 were pretreated with alendronate 70 mg/week, whereas, 20 were treated with calcium 1 g/day and vitamin D 800 IU/day. After 3 months, 30 received alendonate 70/mg, vitamin D 2800 IU/week, and calcium 1 g/day for 12 months (combined therapy), whereas, the other five patients remained on calcium 1 g/day and vitamin D 800 IU/day. The following parameters were assessed before and after therapy: changes in bone resorption markers, circulating osteoclast precursors, formation of osteoclasts in peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures, their viability, and variations in cytokines production. After 3 months of alendronate, there was no significant reduction in the number of osteoclast precursors, osteoclast formation and viability, and cytokine levels, whereas, there was a significant reduction of bone resorption markers. One year of the combined therapy, on the other hand, reduced osteoclast precursors, osteoclast formation, and serum RANKL, whereas, calcium plus vitamin D alone had no effect. We suggest that alendronate mainly acts on mature bone resorbing osteoclasts in the short term, whereas, its long-term administration diminishes their formation by reducing their precursors and serum RANKL.

A phase 2 trial exploring the effects of high‐dose (10,000 IU/day) vitamin D3 in breast cancer patients with bone metastases

Vitamin D deficiency has potential roles in breast cancer etiology and progression. Vitamin D deficiency has also been associated with increased toxicity from bisphosphonate therapy. The optimal dose of vitamin D supplementation is unknown, but daily sunlight exposure can generate the equivalent of a 10,000-IU oral dose of vitamin D(3). This study therefore aimed to assess the effect of this dose of vitamin D(3) in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. Patients with bone metastases treated with bisphosphonates were enrolled into this single-arm phase 2 study. Patients received 10,000 IU of vitamin D(3) and 1000 mg of calcium supplementation each day for 4 months. The effect of this treatment on palliation, bone resorption markers, calcium metabolism, and toxicity were evaluated at baseline and monthly thereafter. Forty patients were enrolled. No significant changes in bone resorption markers were seen. Despite no change in global pain scales, there was a significant reduction in the number of sites of pain. A small but statistically significant increase in serum calcium was seen, as was a significant decrease in serum parathyroid hormone. Treatment unmasked 2 cases of primary hyperparathyroidism, but was not associated with direct toxicity. Daily doses of 10,000 IU vitamin D(3) for 4 months appear safe in patients without comorbid conditions causing hypersensitivity to vitamin D. Treatment reduced inappropriately elevated parathyroid hormone levels, presumably caused by long-term bisphosphonate use. There did not appear to be a significant palliative benefit nor any significant change in bone resorption.

Seasonal Changes in Vitamin D Status and Bone Turnover in Healthy Irish Postmenopausal Women

To examine the effect of season on biochemical markers of bone turnover in 51-to 75-year-old Irish women and to investigate whether such changes are related to vitamin D status. Longitudinal observational study. Cork, Ireland (52 degrees N). 76 apparently healthy, free-living postmenopausal women (aged 51-75 years), not taking any medication and free from any condition likely to affect vitamin D status or calcium/bone metabolism. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [S-25(OH)D] showed a clear seasonal variation with significantly higher (p < 0.001) values during late summer than late winter. Both urinary pyridinoline (Ur-Pyr) (p < 0.01) and deoxypyridinoline (Ur-Dpyr) (p < 0.001), but not serum parathyroid hormone or osteocalcin, showed a marked seasonal variation with lowest values during late-summer. Stratifying women into those with S-25(OH)D levels > or = or <50 nmol/L (vitamin D adequate and inadequate, respectively) during late-winter, showed that Ur-Pyr and Ur-Dpyr in both groups were significantly (p < 0.05) lower during late summer, and the magnitude of the reduction from winter to summer was similar in both groups. Seasonal changes in bone resorption markers appeared to be linked to seasonal changes in vitamin D status. Further research is needed to investigate the impact of these changes on risk of bone loss and fracture.

Changes in bone resorption markers among Japanese patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with alendronate and risedronate

We compared the abilities of alendronate and risedronate to reduce levels of urinary cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTX) in Japanese postmenopausal women. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (alendronate, 5 mg/day, n = 61; risedronate, 2.5 mg/day, n = 60). All patients had taken all medication prescribed for the first month and at least 90% of that prescribed for each of the following 6 months. Urinary NTX was measured at baseline, as well as at 1 and 6 months after starting treatment. According to the guidelines of the Japan Osteoporosis Society, the minimum significant change (MSC) for urinary NTX is defined as a 35% decrease from baseline and the cutoff level for a high risk of future fracture is 54.3 nmol bone collagen equivalent (BCE)/mmol.Cr. The NTX reduction rates at 1 and 6 months were greater with alendronate than with risedronate, but the difference was not significant. The rate of patients with a reduction in the MSC at 1 month was greater with alendronate than with risedronate, but the difference did not reach significance. Alendronate reduced NTX at 1 month significantly more in patients with a high risk of fracture than risedronate, but the difference was no longer significant at 6 months. The rate of MSC did not significantly differ between the two groups. In conclusion, alendronate decreases bone resorption markers more obviously and rapidly than risedronate, especially in high risk for fracture, but not significantly according to the guidelines of the Japan Osteoporosis Society.

Significance of serum CrossLaps as a predictor of changes in bone mineral density during estrogen replacement therapy; comparison with serum carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen and urinary deoxypyridinoline.

The newly developed Elecsys Beta-CrossLaps/serum assay measures C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen and has thus been proposed as a reliable serum marker for bone resorption. We investigated its usefulness for monitoring the therapeutic effect of estrogen replacement therapy on bone turnover and bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Serum Beta-CTx decreased by 43.2% +/- 9.2% (mean +/- SD), and 55.1% +/- 7.0% at 3 and 6 months, respectively, after initiation of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT), which was significantly greater than the respective value of urinary excretion of deoxypyridinoline (DPD) (27.8% +/- 4.1%, 34.1% +/- 4.9%, respectively) or pyridinoline cross-linked carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP) assay (14.5% +/- 4.1%, 13.1% +/- 5.0%, respectively). The percent reduction in serum Beta-CTx at 1, 3, and 6 months after initiation of ERT was significantly correlated in a negative manner with the percent increase in spinal BMD at 6 months. Further, ROC analysis to determine the significance of the percent change in bone resorption markers after 3 months of ERT in predicting the gain in spine BMD after 6 months suggested that serum Beta-CTx and urinary DPD might provide a more discriminating indicator than serum ICTP. In conclusion, the findings suggest that the Elecsys Beta-CrossLaps/serum assay provides a sensitive, and thus useful, tool for assessing bone resorption state in Japanese patients.

Biochemical markers in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Following the introduction of corticosteroids as therapeutic agents in the 1950s, their use has been expanded so that today glucocorticoids are widely used. There are few studies in the literature directly aimed at describing the changes of bone markers following glucocorticoid administration. The interpretation of some of these investigations may be hampered by a number of confounding factors, whose influence is not always taken into consideration. In general, the effects of glucocorticoid administration are represented by a reduction in bone formation markers (particularly considering serum osteocalcin levels) and a trend to an increase or no change in bone resorption markers. The inconsistency of this last finding may be related to the time at which the observation is carried out and to the marker employed.