Cervicomedullary Angle Research Articles

A Prospective Study of CSF Flow Dynamics Across Foramen Magnum in Adult Chiari Malformation/Syringomyelia Complex and its Clinical Correlation with Outcomes after Surgery

Abstract Introduction Chiari I malformation refers to cerebellar tonsillar descent below the foramen magnum and is frequently associated with syringomyelia. Prior cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow studies correlated the clinical severity of these lesions with general flow velocity or bulk flow at the foramen magnum; however, these techniques have not assessed the effect on surgical outcomes. The study aims to present clinical and radiological factors and CSF flow parameters (pre- and postoperative) that affect the surgical outcome. Materials and Methods The institutional ethics committee approved the study. We collected the prospective clinical data, including pre- and postoperative symptoms. Functional grades were determined along with the change in clinical improvement based on clinical examination notes, the change in functional grade was calculated, and the radiologic data were analyzed according to the degree of clinical improvement. The surgical procedure included suboccipital bony decompression with duroplasty. Patients were followed up at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year. Results There were a total of 25 patients. The mean age of the patients was 45.52 ± 13.37 years, with 40% being males and 60% being females. After the surgery, there was a significant increase in the anterior and posterior CSF flows at the foramen magnum. Most had a resolution in the headache and sensory symptoms, while the lower cranial nerve and motor symptoms had a minor resolution at follow-up. Age, sex, and headache do not correlate with the outcome or syrinx improvement. Motor power in the lower limb (preintervention) and syrinx shape (preintervention) were significantly associated with the variable “anterior flow at the foramen magnum” (preintervention; p < 0.05). Average flow, cervicomedullary angle (postintervention), sensory symptom progression, and CSF flow change anterior to the foramen magnum were significantly associated with the variable “anterior flow at the foramen magnum” (postintervention; p < 0.05). Conclusion Even after surgery, persistent foramen magnum CSF outflow obstruction has a robust negative correlation with the outcome. The Chiari outcome predictability index has shown a significant correlation with patient outcomes and can be used to inform patients about the expected outcome. The results of the present study will be helpful in stratifying patients according to their desired outcomes.

Analysis of Failed Atlantoaxial Reduction: Causes of Failure and Strategies for Revision.

The craniovertebral junction (CVJ) presents intricate anatomical challenges. In severe or irreducible malformations, complications such as reduction loss and fixation failure may occur, necessitating revision surgery. The posterior facet joint distraction and fusion (PFDF) technique, offers a solely posterior approach for revisions. Hence, we delineate varied revision scenarios, proposing surgical strategies and technical details to enhance outcomes and mitigate risks, thereby enriching the neurosurgical community's repertoire. This was a retrospective cohort study, analyzed patient data from Xuanwu Hospital, between 2017 to 2023. All patients had a history of surgical treatment for CVJ malformations, and experienced failure or loss of reduction. The distance from the odontoid process tip to the Chamberlain's line (DCL), the atlantodental interval (ADI), clivus-canal angle, cervicomedullary angle, width of subarachnoid space, CVJ area, and width of syrinx were used for radiographic assessment. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and SF-12 scores were used for clinical assessment. Independent sample t-tests were employed. A significance level of p < 0.05 indicates statistically significant differences. We analyzed data from 35 patients. For patients who underwent PFDF, the postoperative DCL, ADI, and clivus-canal angle significantly improved. For all patients, the postoperative cervicomedullary angle, width of subarachnoid space, CVJ area, and width of syrinx all demonstrated significant improvement, indicating the relief of neural compression. All patients showed significant improvement in both symptoms and clinical assessments. Severe atlantoaxial joint locking or ligament contracting are the fundamental cause of reduction and fixation failure. Anterior odontoidectomy is indicated for patients with robust bony fusion of the atlantoaxial joint in an unreduced position. The PFDF technique is safe and effective for patients with incomplete atlantoaxial bony fusion. Preoperative assessment of surgical feasibility and vertebral artery status ensures surgical safety and efficacy.

Clinical effect and prognosis of transoral or endoscope-assisted transoral release for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation: A retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThe clinical applications of endoscope-assisted transoral release for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocations are limited. This study aimed to investigate the clinical effect and prognostic factors of traditional and endoscope-assisted transoral release, as well as posterior reduction and fixation, in treating irreducible atlantoaxial dislocations. Materials and methodsWe conducted a retrospective study on 59 patients with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation who underwent either traditional or endoscope-assisted transoral release, posterior fixation, and fusion between January 2018 and January 2023. Various data, including surgical time, blood loss, drainage volume, oral intake, hospital stay, complications, and neurological status (assessed by the Japanese Orthopedic Association [JOA] score and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), were recorded. Imaging parameters such as the atlantodontoid interval (ADI), space available for the cord (SAC), and cervicomedullary angle (CMA) were analyzed and compared. In addition, the correlation between ODI, JOA and patient age, course of disease, preoperative ADI, SAC and CMA were analyzed. ResultsNo significant differences were observed in age, sex, BMI, preoperative ADI, preoperative SAC, or preoperative CMA. All patients achieved excellent reduction with no significant differences between the two groups. Patients in the endoscopic group experienced significantly reduced blood loss, earlier oral intake, and shorter hospital stays compared to those in the open group (P < 0.05). The ODI and JOA scores improved significantly in both groups at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). Postoperative ADI, SAC, and CMA values in both groups were significantly better than preoperative values (P < 0.001). The patient age, course of disease and the preoperative ADI were negatively correlated with the postoperative ODI and the JOA improvement ratio (P < 0.01), and the preoperative SAC and preoperative CMA had positive correlations with the postoperative ODI and the JOA improvement ratio (P < 0.01) at 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. ConclusionPatient age, course of disease, preoperative ADI, SAC and CMA are correlated with the operative prognosis of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation. The endoscope-assisted transoral approach, compared to the traditional transoral approach, is minimally invasive, resulting in less operative blood loss, earlier oral intake and a shorter length of hospital stay, which could be offered as an alternative for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation.

Intra-articular Distraction Versus Decompression to Treat Basilar Invagination Without Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 54 Patients.

The surgical management of basilar invagination without atlantoaxial dislocation (type B basilar invagination) remains controversial. Hence, we have reported the use of posterior intra-articular C1-2 facet distraction, fixation, and cantilever technique versus foramen magnum decompression in treating type B basilar invagination as well as the results and surgical indications for this procedure. This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Fifty-four patients who underwent intra-articular distraction, fixation, and cantilever reduction (experimental group) and foramen magnum decompression (control group) were enrolled in this study. Distance from odontoid tip to Chamberlain's line, clivus-canal angle, cervicomedullary angle, craniovertebral junction (CVJ) triangle area, width of subarachnoid space and syrinx were used for radiographic assessment. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and 12-item Short Form health survey (SF-12) scores were used for clinical assessment. All patients in the experimental group had a better reduction of basilar invagination and better relief of pressure on nerves. JOA scores and SF-12 scores also had better improvements in the experimental group postoperation. SF-12 score improvement was associated with preoperative CVJ triangle area (Pearson index, 0.515; p = 0.004), cutoff value of 2.00 cm2 indicating the surgical indication of our technique. No severe complications or infections occurred. Posterior intra-articular C1-2 facet distraction, fixation, and cantilever reduction technique is an effective treatment for type B basilar invagination. As various factors involved, other treatment strategies should also be investigated.

Modified interfacet technique using shaped autologous occipital bone mass for basilar invagination

PurposeIn economically undeveloped areas, surgery for basilar invagination (BI) is still a serious economic burden for people. This study introduces a modified interfacet technique for the treatment of BI using shaped autologous occipital bone mass to reduce BI and to save economical expenditure. MethodsThe data of 6 patients with BI who underwent modified interfacet technique using shaped autologous occipital bone mass in our hospital from April 2020 to February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. During the operation, osteotomy at the external occipital protuberance was performed using ultrasonic osteotome, followed by interfacet release and implantation of shaped autologous occipital bone mass to complete vertical reduction. The atlantodental interval (ADI), Chamberlain's line violation (CLV), clivo-axial angle (CXA) and cervico-medullary angle (CMA) were compared before and after surgery. Additionally, we observed implant stability during the follow-up period to assess the long-term success of the modified interfacet technique. ResultsThe surgical procedure was successful in all six patients, with no reported incidents of vascular injury, spinal cord injury, or dural tear. Following the operation, improvements were observed in the ADI, CLV, CXA, and CMA. Throughout the follow-up period, the implants remained stable, demonstrating no complications such as bone resorption of the autologous occipital bone mass, implant fracture, or displacement. ConclusionThe utilization of shaped autologous occipital bone mass in atlantoaxial interfacet bone grafting has demonstrated effectiveness and feasibility. This technique offers simplicity, ease of preparation, and cost-effectiveness, making it a viable option for treating BI.

Correlation Among Syrinx Resolution, Cervical Sagittal Realignment, and Surgical Outcome After Posterior Reduction for Basilar Invagination, Atlantoaxial Dislocation, and Syringomyelia.

The correlation among syrinx resolution, occipitoaxial sagittal alignment, and surgical outcome in long-term follow-up seems to have not been clarified. To further explore the relationship between the syrinx resolution and occipitoaxial realignment after posterior reduction and fixation in basilar invagination (BI)-atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) patients with syringomyelia. A continuous series of 32 patients with BI-AAD and syringomyelia who received direct posterior reduction met the inclusion criteria of this study. Their clinical and imaging data were analyzed retrospectively. Before surgery and at the last follow-up, we used the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) to assess the neurological status, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple stepwise regression analysis were used to explore the relevant factors that may affect surgical outcomes. There were significant differences in atlantodental interval, clivus-axial angle, occiput-C2 angle (Oc-C2A), cervicomedullary angle (CMA), subarachnoid space (SAS) at the foramen magnum (FM), syrinx size, NDI, and JOA score after surgery compared with those before surgery. ΔCMA and the resolution rate of syrinx/cord as relevant factors were correlated with the recovery rate of JOA (R 2 = 0.578, P < .001) and NDI (R 2 = 0.369, P < .01). What's more, ΔSAS/FMD (SAS/FM diameter) and ΔOc-C2A were positively correlated with the resolution rate of syrinx/cord (R 2 = 0.643, P < .001). With medulla decompression and occipital-cervical sagittal realignment after posterior reduction and fusion for BI-AAD patients with syringomyelia, the structural remodeling of the craniovertebral junction and occipitoaxial realignment could contribute to syringomyelia resolution.

Direct intraoperative two-step distraction and reduction for basilar invagination with atlantoaxial dislocation

Objective: To assess the clinical impact of direct two-step distraction reduction (TSDR) for basilar invagination (BI) with atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of patients who underwent TSDR and occipitocervical fusion in West China Hospital between October 2013 and March 2021. Depending on whether the preoperative decrease was greater than 50% on preoperative hyperextension X-rays, the patients were split into two groups. The neurological function [Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score], atlantodens interval (ADI), the distance of odontoid process beyond McRae Line (ML) and Wackenheim Line (WL), cervicomedullary angle (CMA), O-C2 angle (OC2A), and complications incidence were compared between two groups preoperatively and postoperatively. Results: There were 12 men and 23 women among the 35 patients with BI and AAD, and the age ranged from 28 to 71 years, with an mean age of (52.0±13.4) years. In the preoperative reduction ≥50% group, there were 4 males and 9 females with an average age of (54.0±13.8) years; in the preoperative reduction <50% group, there were 8 males and 14 females with a mean age of (50.9±13.4) years. All the patients were followed-up for a mean time of (23.3±13.4) months. There was no significant difference in age, gender, bleeding, length of hospital stay and follow-up time between the two groups (all P>0.05). The JOA score, ADI, WL, ML and CMA of 35 patients were significantly improved when compared with those before operation (all P<0.05). The reduction degree of ADI, ML and WL was more than 80% in 31 cases (88.57%), 30 cases (85.71%) and 31 cases (88.57%), respectively. There was no significant difference in postoperative ADI, ML and WL between the two groups (all P>0.05). All patients had no incision infection, no loosening or breakage of the internal fixators. Dysphagia occurred in 3 patients, non-fusion happened in 1 patient, but no instability in X-ray of cervical dynamic position was found, no loosening or displacement occurred in internal fixators, and partial spontaneous fusion occurred between atlantoaxial lateral mass joints. Conclusions: For BI with AAD without atlantoaxial bony connection or serious atlantoaxial facet joint inclination, TSDR could obtain satisfactory reduction degree. The reduction degree on preoperative hyperextension X-ray doesn't affect the degree of intraoperative reduction.

Efficacy of a Lateral Mass Fusion Device Combined with a Three-Dimensional–Printed Model in the Treatment of Craniovertebral Junction Abnormalities

To investigate the efficacy of a lateral mass fusion device combined with a three-dimensional-printed model in treatment of craniovertebral junction abnormalities. This retrospective study comprised 56 patients with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation who underwent posterior fixation between January 2016 and December 2019. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether or not cages were used-cage group and autograft group. Visual analog scale score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, health-related quality of life, American Spinal Injury Association spinal cord injury grade, atlas-dens interval, space available for the cord, cervicomedullary angle, and fusion rate were compared between groups. Medical follow-up was >1 year. There was no statistical difference between groups in preoperative visual analog scale score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey score, American Spinal Injury Association grade, atlas-dens interval, space available for the cord, and cervicomedullary angle, and these indexes significantly improved after surgery (P < 0.05). Visual analog scale score and atlas-dens interval were lower in the cage group than in the autograft group (P < 0.05). Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey score, space available for the cord, and cervicomedullary angle were significantly higher in the cage group than in the autograft group (P < 0.05). Fusion rate of the cage group 4-6 months after surgery was higher than that of the autograft group (P= 0.068). American Spinal Injury Association grade was significantly higher in the cage group than in the autograft group (P < 0.05). During 1-year follow-up, neurological function improvement and atlantoaxial joint reduction were satisfactory. The lateral mass fusion device combined with a three-dimensional printed model may be a clinically useful technique.

Three-dimensional reduction method with a modified C2 isthmus screw in irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation: a technical note

BackgroundThree-dimensional reduction plays a vital role in surgical reduction of irreversible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD). However, the most commonly used combination of C1 pedicle screw (PS) or lateral mass screw (LMS) and C2 PS or isthmus screw often fails to achieve satisfactory reduction at one time. The difficulty is usually caused by short anteroposterior and vertical distance between heads of C1 and C2 screws, which lack enough space for reduction operation. The objective of this study is to describe a three-dimensional reduction method with a modified C2 isthmus screw and to illustrate its advantage and effectiveness for IAAD.MethodsTwelve patients with IAAD underwent reduction and fixation with modified C2 isthmus screw combined with C1 PS or LMS, fusion with autologous bone graft. The insertion point was lateral to the intersection of caudal edge of C2 lamina and lateral mass, with a trajectory towards C2 isthmus, via lateral mass. The three-dimensional reduction was achieved through pulling and distracting. Radiographic evaluation included anteroposterior and direct distance between different insertion points, the occipitoaxial angle (O-C2A), clivus-canal angle (CCA) and cervicomedullary angle (CMA). Clinical outcomes evaluation included the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Visual analog scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI).ResultsAll the patients maintained effective reduction during the follow-up. The anteroposterior and direct distance was significantly higher in modified C2 isthmus screw than C2 PS whether combined with C1 PS or LMS (P < 0.05). The degree of O-C2A, CCA and CMA, JOA score, NDI, and VAS were significantly improved after the surgery (P < 0.05).ConclusionsThree-dimensional reduction method with a modified C2 isthmus screw is effective and safe in managing IAAD. It can increase the anteroposterior and vertical distance between the heads of C1 and C2 screws, which is benefit for the three-dimensional reduction operation of IAAD.

Odontoid Resorption After Posterior Occipitocervical Fusion in Rheumatoid Basilar Invagination

Background Context: Inflammatory arthritis of the cervical spine is common and begins early after the onset of rheumatoid arthritis. Atlantoaxial instability is the most common pattern followed by cranial settling or basilar invagination, with subaxial subluxation being least common. Vertical migration of the odontoid (basilar invagination) poses an increased risk of sudden death from compression of the brain stem. A combination of transoral decompression and posterior occipitocervical fusion has been described, although a single posterior approach stabilization may suffice and avoid the associated comorbidities with an anterior/posterior surgery in a high-risk rheumatoid patient. Purpose: To report a case of odontoid resorption and cervicomedullary angle improvement after occipitocervical fusion. Study Design: A retrospective case report. Methods: Radiographic analysis. Results: After posterior occipitocervical fusion alone for basilar invagination there was a reduction of cervicomedullary angle to 127 degrees at 3 years follow up. This was improved from an initial 115 degrees through odontoid remodeling. Conclusions: Basilar invagination treated with posterior alone occipitocervical stabilization may suffice in providing stability and long term decompression of the cervicomedullary junction through resorption and remodeling of the odontoid. This case study supports the viability of avoiding a transoral resection for an irreducible severely migrated odontoid.

Usefulness of a Three-Dimensional-Printed Model in the Treatment of Irreducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation with Transoral Atlantoaxial Reduction Plate.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the usefulness of a 3D‐printed model for transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate (TARP) surgery in the treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD).MethodsA retrospective review was conducted of 23 patients (13 men, 10 women; mean age 58.17 ± 5.27 years) with IAAD who underwent TARP from January 2015 to July 2017. Patients were divided into a 3D group (12 patients) and a non‐3D group (11 patients). A preoperative simulation process was undertaken for the patients in the 3D group, with preselection of the TARP system using a 3D‐printed 1:1 scale model, while only imaging data was used for the non‐3D group. Complications, clinical outcomes (Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] and visual analogue score [VAS]), and image measurements (atlas–dens interval [ADI], cervicomedullary angle [CMA], and clivus‐canal angle [CCA]) were noted preoperatively and at the last follow up.ResultsA total of 23 patients with a follow‐up time of 16.26 ± 4.27 months were included in the present study. The surgery duration, intraoperative blood loss, and fluoroscopy times in the 3D group were found to be shorter than those in non‐3D group, with statistical significance. The surgery duration was 3.29 ± 0.45 h in the 3D group and 4.68 ± 0.90 h in the non‐3D group, and the estimated intraoperative blood loss was 131.67 ± 43.03 mL in the 3D group and 185.45 ± 42.28 mL in the non‐3D group. No patients received blood transfusions. The intraoperative fluoroscopy times were 5.67 ± 0.89 in the 3D group and 7.91 ± 1.45 in the non‐3D group. Preoperatively and at last follow up, JOA and VAS scores and ADI, CCA, and CMA were improved significantly within the two groups. However, no statistical difference was observed between the two groups. However, surgical site infection occurred in 1 patient in the 3D group, who underwent an emergency revision operation of the removal of TARP device and posterior occipitocervical fixation; the patient recovered 2 weeks after the surgery. In 2 patients in the traditional group, a mistake occurred in the placement of screws, with no neurological symptoms related to the misplacement.ConclusionPreoperative surgical simulation using a 3D‐printed real‐size model is an intuitive and effective aid for TARP surgery for treating IAAD. The 3D‐printed biomodel precisely replicated patient‐specific anatomy for use in complicated craniovertebral junction surgery. The information was more useful than that available with 3D reconstructed images.

Transoral release to realign postoperative loss of reduction following occipitocervical fixation for congenital basilar invagination.

Revision surgery in an irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD) previously operated with a posterior approach is challenging. Multiple modalities using anterior, posterior, and dual approaches have been described. We report a so far unreported technique of revision surgery by posterior implant removal and decompression with anterior transoral release followed by posterior instrumentation. 14-year male with basilar invagination (BI) with IAAD, previously operated with posterior decompression and instrumented occipitocervical fusion presented three months later with post-traumatic recurrence of myelopathy with quadriparesis with Di Lorenzo grade 4 and loss of reduction. He was operated with a posterior implant and early fusion mass removal with extended foramen magnum decompression (FMD), followed by anterior transoral release with a satisfactory reduction on traction, and finally, a posterior revision instrumented occipitocervical fusion. At 2-year follow-up, the patient was symptom-free with Di Lorenzo grade 1 and cervicomedullary angle improvement from 97.4° to 141.2°; achieving bony fusion. Single-stage posterior-anterior transoral-posterior approach can be used to achieve satisfactory reduction for a revision BI with IAAD with prior posterior instrumentation.

Comparative Analysis Between Machine Learning Algorithms and Conventional Regression in Predicting the Prognosis of Patients with Basilar Invagination: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

To identify predictors of basilar invagination (BI) prognosis and compare diagnostic properties between logistic modeling and machine learning methods. We conducted a single-center retrospective study. Patients at our hospital who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified between August 2015 and August 2020 for inclusion. Candidate predictors, such as demographics, clinical scores, radiographic parameters, and outcome, were included. The primary outcome was the prognosis evaluated by the change in patient-reported Japanese orthopaedic association (PRO-JOA) score. Conventional logistic regression models and machine learning algorithms were implemented. Models were compared, considering the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and calibration curve. Overall, the machine learning algorithms and traditional logistic regression models performed similarly. The postoperative cervicomedullary angle, head-neck flexion angle (HNFA), atlantodental interval, postoperative clivo-axial angle, age, postoperative clivus slope, postoperative cranial incidence, weight, postoperative HNFA, and postoperative Boogaard's angle (BoA) were identified as important predictors for BI prognosis. Among the surveyed radiographic parameters, postoperative BoA was the most important predictor of BI prognosis. In the validation dataset, the bagged trees model performed best (AUC, 0.90). Through machine learning, we have demonstrated predictors of BI prognosis. Machine learning methods did not provide too many advantages over logistic regression in predicting BI prognosis but remain promising.

Release, reduction, and fixation of one-stage posterior approach for basilar invagination with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation

Purpose We evaluate the efficacy, safety and indications of single stage posterior release, reduction, and fixation of basilar invagination (BI) with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD). Materials and methods Seventeen patients with BI and IAAD consecutively underwent one-stage release, reduction, and fixation by a posterior approach from July 2000 to June 2015 were followed up for at least 12 months. There were 8 males. Mean age was 56 35.2 ± 13.8 years (range 12–56). The clinical symptoms and signs of the patients were recorded. Pre- and postoperative imaging examinations were performed. Neurological function was assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) and Ranawat scores. Results Average follow-up time was 47.4 months (12–97 months). The JOA score increased from preoperative 4–10 (8.06 ± 2.52) to postoperative 13–16 (15.20 ± 0.62). The preoperative Chamberlain line, McRae line, Wackenheim line, atlantodens interval, and cervico medullary angle were 12.52 ± 5.17 mm, 6.59 ± 3.04 mm, 6.96 ± 4.32 mm, 9.88 ± 1.93 mm, and 115.35 ± 12.40°, respectively. The postoperative values were 2.0 ± 3.67 mm, −3.06 ± 1.85 mm, −1.76 ± 2.88 mm, 1.17 ± 1.18 mm, and 136.76 ± 11.44°, respectively. Conclusion One-stage release, reduction, and fixation for patients with BI and IAAD through a posterior approach is safe and efficient.

Cervical Spinal Cord Compression and Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Syndromic Craniosynostosis

Cerebellar tonsillar herniation arises frequently in syndromic craniosynostosis and causes central and obstructive apneas in other diseases through spinal cord compression. The purposes of this study were the following: 1) to determine the prevalence of cervical spinal cord compression in syndromic craniosynostosis, and 2) to evaluate its connection with sleep-disordered breathing. This was a cross-sectional study including patients with syndromic craniosynostosis who underwent MR imaging and polysomnography. Measures encompassed the compression ratio at the level of the odontoid process and foramen magnum and the cervicomedullary angle. MR imaging studies of controls were included. Linear mixed models were developed to compare patients with syndromic craniosynostosis with controls and to evaluate the association between obstructive and central sleep apneas and MR imaging parameters. One hundred twenty-two MR imaging scans and polysomnographies in 89 patients were paired; 131 MR imaging scans in controls were included. The mean age at polysomnography was 5.7 years (range, 0.02-18.9 years). The compression ratio at the level of the odontoid process was comparable with that in controls; the compression ratio at the level of the foramen magnum was significantly higher in patients with Crouzon syndrome (+27.1, P < .001). The cervicomedullary angle was significantly smaller in Apert, Crouzon, and Saethre-Chotzen syndromes (-4.4°, P = .01; -10.2°, P < .001; -5.2°, P = .049). The compression ratios at the level of the odontoid process and the foramen magnum, the cervicomedullary angle, and age were not associated with obstructive apneas (P > .05). Only age was associated with central apneas (P = .02). The prevalence of cervical spinal cord compression in syndromic craniosynostosis is low and is not correlated to sleep disturbances. However, considering the high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in syndromic craniosynostosis and the low prevalence of compression and central sleep apnea in our study, we would, nevertheless, recommend a polysomnography in case of compression on MR imaging studies.

Surgical treatment for basilar invagination with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation: transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate fixation vs occipitocervical fixation

BackgroundTransoral atlantoaxial reduction plate (TARP) fixation or occipitocervical fixation (OF) is an effective treatment for basilar invagination (BI) with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD). But, all current clinical studies involved a single surgical procedure. The clinical effects of TARP and OF operation for BI with IAAD have yet to be compared. We therefore present this report to compare the treatment of TARP and OF procedure for BI with IAAD.MethodsFifty-six patients with BI with IAAD who underwent TARP or OF operation from June 2011 to June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Among these, 35 patients underwent TARP operation (TARP group), and 21 patients underwent OF operation (OF group). We compared the difference of clinical, radiological, and surgical outcomes between the TARP and OF groups postoperatively.ResultsCompared with OF group, the operative time and blood loss in TARP group were lower. There was no statistical difference in the atlantodental interval (ADI), clivus canal angle (CCA), cervicomedullary angle (CMA), distance between the top of the odontoid process and the Chamberlain line (CL) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score between the TARP and OF groups preoperatively, but the improvements of these parameters in the TARP group were superior to those in the OF group postoperatively. The fusion rates were higher in the TARP group than those in the OF group at the early stage postoperatively.ConclusionsTARP and OF operations are effective surgical treatment for BI with IAAD, but the performance of reduction and decompression and earlier bone fusion rates of TARP procedure are superior to those of OF.

Transoral intraarticular cage distraction and C-JAWS fixation for revision of basilar invagination with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation

BackgroundThe revision surgery of basilar invagination (BI) with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD) after a previous occipitocervical fusion (OCF) is challenging. Transoral revision surgery has more advantages than a combined anterior and posterior approach in addressing this pathology. The C-JAWS is a cervical compressive staple that has been used in the lower cervical spine with many advantages. Up to now, there is no report on the application of C-JAWS in the atlantoaxial joint. We therefore present this report to investigate the clinical outcomes of transoral intraarticular cage distraction and C-JAWS fixation for revision of BI with IAAD.MethodsFrom June 2011 to June 2015, 9 patients with BI and IAAD were revised by this technique after previous posterior OCF in our department. Plain cervical radiographs, computed tomographic scans and magnetic resonance imaging were obtained pre- and postoperatively to assess the degree of atlantoaxial dislocation and compression of the cervical cord. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score was used to evaluate the neurological function.ResultsThe revision surgeries were successfully performed in all patients. The average follow-up duration was 18.9 ± 7.3 months (range 9–30 months). The postoperative atlas-dens interval (ADI), cervicomedullary angle (CMA), distance between the top of the odontoid process and the Chamberlain line (CL) and JOA score were significantly improved in all patients (P < 0.05). Bony fusion was achieved after 3–9 months in all cases. No patients developed recurrent atlantoaxial instability.ConclusionsTransoral revision surgery by intraarticular cage distraction and C-JAWS fixation could provide a satisfactory outcome for BI with IAAD after a previous unsuccessful posterior operation.

Anterior release without odontoidectomy for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation: transoral or endoscopic transnasal?

To compare transoral and endoscopic transnasal anterior release without odontoidectomy and posterior reduction and fixation to treat irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD). From June 2006 to January 2017, 35 consecutive patients with IAAD underwent transoral (Tr-Oral group) or endoscopic transnasal (Tr-Nasal group) release and posterior fixation and fusion in our department. Clinical neurological recovery (Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score) and radiological reduction parameters including atlantodontoid interval (ADI), space available for the cord (SAC) and cervicomedullary angle (CMA) were analyzed and compared. The operation duration, blood loss, length of intensive care unit (ICU)/hospital stay and complications were recorded. All 35 patients (18 and 17 patients in the Tr-Oral and Tr-Nasal groups, respectively) were followed up for a mean of 36.4months (range, 21-60months). All patients achieved excellent anatomical reduction and clinical neurological recovery, with no significant differences between the two groups. The JOA score, ADI, SAC and CMA were not significantly different between the two groups at various postoperative points. Although the Tr-Oral group had shorter operation time and less blood loss than the Tr-Nasal group, the Tr-Nasal group tended to have a significantly shorter hospital/ICU stay, earlier extubation and earlier oral intake than the Tr-Oral group. The transoral and endoscopic transnasal approaches can achieve equivalent release and reduction effects when treating IAAD. Compared to the transoral approach, the endoscopic transnasal route is less invasive with earlier extubation and oral intake, shorter hospital/ICU stays and lower medical costs, which is conducive to enhancedrecoveryafter surgery.

Cervicomedullary angle as an independent radiological predictor of postoperative neurological outcome in type A basilar invagination

To propose an independent radiological index to evaluate surgical outcomes of A type basilar invagination, a retrospective study was conducted to compare the clinical outcome between procedures 1 and 2 by applying intraoperative consistent traction and manual reduction. Moreover, the atlantodental interval (ADI), cervicomedullary angle (CMA), bilateral sagittal inclination of atlantoaxial joint (SIAA) were measured and compared to pre-operation. Postoperatively, only these patients undergoing procedure 2 achieved significant neurological improvement. The ADIs and the SIAAs decreased in both groups, these differences are statistically significant between pre- and post- operation. For postoperative CMAs, only these patients undergoing modified surgery gained significant improvement of angle with mean 141°. We concluded that the CMA or SIAA could be a radiological predictor to evaluate surgical outcome in BI, among which the CMA is a more independent and easily measurable predictor that is closely correlated with satisfactory neurological improvements. Moreover, procedure 2 with intraoperative resistant cranial traction and manual reduction can help us achieve a good CMA.

Comparison of imaging parameters pre- and post- reductive procedure for atlantoaxial dislocation via posterior fixation using pedicle screw and rod: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundTo compare the imaging parameters pre- and post- reductive procedure for atlantoaxial dislocation via posterior fixation using pedicle screw and rod.MethodsThirty-seven patients suffering from atlantoaxial dislocation underwent posterior reduction and internal fixation by pedicle screw and rod. We measured pre-operative and post-operative atlantodental interval (ADI), clivus-canal angle (CCA), cervicomedullary angle (CMA), sum of lateral mass interspace (SLMI) of the operation and the control group. ADI, CCA, CMA, and SLMI between the pre-operative and post-operative conditions of the operation group and the control group were compared.ResultsThe ADI, CCA, CMA, and SLMI in the pre-operative condition of the operation group were 8.3 ± 4.3 mm, 130.2 ± 14.2°, 133.8 ± 16.7°, and 3.7 ± 1.3 mm, respectively, those in the post-operative condition of the operation group were 1.0 ± 0.9 mm, 148.5 ± 9.4°, 156.0 ± 8.2°, and 8.0 ± 2.7 mm, respectively, while those in the control group were 1.2 ± 0.3 mm, 152.7 ± 5.3°, 160.2 ± 6.3°, and 4.5 ± 1.0 mm respectively. Post-operative ADI, CCA, CMA, and SLMI were statistically different (p < 0.01) from pre-operative assessments. The SLMI has no significant difference between the pre-operative condition and the control group. Post-operative SLMI was statistically different from that of the control group.ConclusionsThe lateral mass joints were widened after the anatomical reduction of atlantoaxial dislocation by pedicle screw and rod. Widening of the lateral mass exists in both atlantoaxial fusion and occipital-cervical fusion.