Cervical Spine Surgery Research Articles

Identifying Factors for Predicting Postoperative Segmental Motor Paralysis in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Multicenter Study.

Retrospective cohort study. To investigate the incidence of and risk factors for segmental motor paralysis after anterior cervical spine surgery. Segmental motor paralysis is a potential complication following both anterior and posterior cervical decompression procedures; however, previous studies investigating risk factors for segmental motor paralysis after anterior cervical spine surgery were limited by small sample sizes. Consequently, the exact pathogenesis and risk factors for this complication remain poorly understood, highlighting the need for larger-scale investigations focused exclusively on anterior cervical spine surgeries. We retrospectively reviewed the clinico-demographic and operative factors and postoperative outcomes of 1,428 patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery at three spine centers in Japan. Postoperative segmental motor paralysis was defined as deterioration of upper extremity muscle strength by ≥1 grade; recovery was defined as a return to preoperative muscle strength levels. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors. Ninety-nine patients (6.9%) developed segmental motor paralysis, mostly involving the C5 segment (81.8%), the incidence being highest in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and those undergoing anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion or hybrid fusion (discectomy + corpectomy). Older age, male sex, higher body mass index, OPLL, and cervical corpectomy were independent risk factors for paralysis, with these patients having significantly worse clinical outcomes at 1 year postoperatively. Most patients (74/99, 79.6%) regained preoperative muscle strength levels an final follow up. This study identified important clinico-demographic and operative risk factors for segmental motor paralysis after anterior cervical spine surgery. Patients undergoing corpectomy, with or without OPLL, were found to be at particularly high risk. While most patients recover well, worse outcomes with segmental motor paralysis highlight the importance of preventing this complication, particularly for OPLL patients and corpectomy procedures. III.

Comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic and full-endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a retrospective analysis.

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of the full-endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (FE-PCF) and the unilateral biportal endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (UBE-PCF) in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). Patients who underwent posterior cervical spine surgery in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical method, the patients were divided into two groups: FE-PCF group and UBE-PCF group. Perioperative data included operation time, Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay were collected. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS)-arm, VAS-neck, and Neck Diability Index (NDI) was used to evaluate the clinical outcomes at preoperative, postoperative 1 week and Last follow-up. Serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were recorded to evaluate surgical invasiveness. A total of 160 patients were included, including 89 cases of FE-PCF and 71 cases of UBE-PCF. The demographic and preoperative data showed no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). The mean operating time was significantly shorter in the UBE-PCF group compared to FE-PCF group (P < 0.05). Serum CRP and CPK levels of the two groups both exhibited a pattern of rising and then falling, peaking one day following surgery and decreasing to near normal values three days after the operation. Compared with preoperative, both groups showed significant improvement in postoperative VAS and NDI scores, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). However, the differences in results between the groups were not significant. Both UBE-PCF and FE-PCF are secure and efficient methods for treating CSR by continuous visualization. UBE-PCF offers predictable and adequate decompression within a reduced surgical duration, facilitated by its separate observation and operation channels.

A rare case of severe postoperative retropharyngeal oedema due to lymphatic disruption following anterior cervical spine surgery

A rare case of severe postoperative retropharyngeal oedema due to lymphatic disruption following anterior cervical spine surgery

Baseline Neck Disability Index and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Predict Postoperative Return to Normal in Cervical Spine Surgery.

Recent studies assessing the importance of various preoperative factors on postoperative outcomes following spine surgery have uncovered several important variables that influence subjective and objective outcomes following cervical spine surgery, but it is still unclear which patients are most likely to benefit from operative management. The objective of this study was to assess whether preoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can be used to predict which patients achieve "normal" levels of pain and function after surgery. This was a prospective cohort study. This study included all adult patients undergoing cervical spine surgery by 1 of 7 senior spine surgeons at our institution between 2016 and 2018. Of the 164 patients who were eligible for 6-month follow-up at the time that study data were collected, 139 had available follow-up data and were included in our analysis. Patients completed the Neck Disability Index (NDI) as well as the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference computer adaptive tests preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Patients who achieved postoperative patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) for NDI (≤17) and the normative mean (50) for PROMIS were identified. The relationship between preoperative PROMs and the probability of achieving PASS and the normative mean was assessed. One hundred thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria with diagnoses of myelopathy (n = 36), radiculopathy (n = 48), and myeloradiculopathy (n = 49). For NDI, a 1-point worsening in the preoperative score resulted in an OR of achieving PASS of 0.96 (P < 0.001) in the overall population. This association held true for patients with radiculopathy (OR 0.96; P = 0.022) but not myelopathy (OR 0.98; P = 0.35). For PROMIS PF, a 1-point improvement in the preoperative score resulted in an OR of achieving the normative mean of 1.10 (P < 0.001). This association held true for patients with radiculopathy (OR 1.14; P = 0.033) but did not reach statistical significance for patients with myelopathy (OR 1.03; P = 0.515). Preoperative PROMs can predict postoperative benefit for patients undergoing cervical spine surgery, with worse baseline function associated with a lower likelihood of attaining PASS for NDI and the normative mean for PROMIS PF, especially for patients with radiculopathy. Baseline symptoms and function, including myelopathy or radiculopathy-dominant symptoms and preoperative PROMs, may predict postoperative outcomes.

Dysphagia After Cervical Spinal Surgery: An Assessment of Incidence and Predisposing Factors

Background: Dysphagia is common following cervical spinal surgery (CSS) yet reported incidence and risk factors are highly heterogeneous. This case-control study aimed to determine the incidence of dysphagia after CSS and identify its predisposing factors. Methods: Records of 1199 patients who underwent CSS over a 2-year period at our center were reviewed. Patients with postoperative dysphagia and an equal number of randomly selected patients without dysphagia were included for analysis. Demographic, clinical, intraoperative, and perioperative factors were compared using univariate followed by multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: The study population consisted of 94 (7.8%) patients with dysphagia and 94 controls. Patients with postoperative dysphagia were older [mean (SD) 60.7(12) vs 54.7(12), P = .002] and more likely to have preoperative dysphagia (16% vs 0%, P &lt; .001). No other demographic or clinical factors were significant. Mid-level (C3-4, C4-5) (66% vs 48%, P = .018) and multilevel surgeries (67% vs 50%, P = .026) were associated with dysphagia. No other intraoperative factors were significant. The presence of any (abscess, dehiscence, hematoma, CSF leak, prevertebral edema, esophageal, or vocal cord injury) perioperative complication (20% vs 3.2%, P &lt; .001) was associated with dysphagia, with dehiscence (6.5% vs 0%, P = .029) and hematoma (6.5% vs 0%, P = .029) showing the strongest association. Multivariable analysis identified age ≥70 [OR (95% CI): 2.8 (1-7), P = .031] and any perioperative complication [OR (95% CI): 6.7 (2-25), P = .004] as independent predictors of dysphagia. Conclusion: The incidence of dysphagia after cervical spine surgery is 7.8%. The risk of postoperative dysphagia is 6.7-times higher in those with perioperative complications and 2.8-times higher in patients over 70.

Serotonergic Antidepressants are Associated With Higher Rates of Hematoma After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Large Propensity-matched Cohort Analysis.

Large database propensity-matched retrospective cohort analysis. This study aimed to investigate the potential effects of serotonergic antidepressants on outcomes after anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS). It was hypothesized that the perioperative use of serotonergic antidepressants would be associated with higher rates of hematoma formation and worse outcomes after ACSS. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) have been associated with worse outcomes after orthopaedic procedures. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using TriNetX, an aggregated and de-identified electronic health record platform. Patients who underwent anterior cervical surgery were included via Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes and the International Classification of Disease (ICD-10) encounter diagnosis codes. Cohorts were 1:1 propensity matched across seven demographic and medical comorbidity parameters, and outcomes were compared. The incidence of adverse outcomes, as well as healthcare utilization, within 14 days, 30 days, 90 days and 2-years post-operatively was evaluated. Following propensity matching, each cohort consisted of 9,249 patients, for a total of 18,498 patients included in final statistical analysis. SSRI/SNRI's were associated with higher odds of hematoma formation within 7-days (0.69% vs. 0.46%, OR 1.5 [95% CI 1.02-2.2], P=0.04) and within 14-days postoperatively (0.81% vs. 0.52%, OR 1.6 [95% CI 1.1-2.3], P=0.01. Within 30- and 90-days, SSRI/SNRI's were associated with higher risk of emergency department utilization (30-day OR 1.30 [1.1-1.4]; 90-day OR 1.3 [1.2-1.4]) and irrigation & debridement (I&D) (30-day OR 1.9 [1.2-3.0]). SSRIs/SNRIs were also associated with significantly higher risk of I&D within 2-years (OR 1.3 [1.1-1.6]). The use of serotonergic antidepressants perioperatively was associated with higher odds and risk of numerous outcomes, including hematoma formation, emergency department utilization and the need for irrigation & debridement. Future prospective studies are required to confirm these results. III; retrospective cohort analysis.

Preoperative Anxiety: An Important Risk Factor of Postoperative Adverse Events and Increased Reoperation Rates in Patients Undergoing Single-Level Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion

Introduction: With the rising prevalence of mental health disorders, it is important to consider their correlation with surgical outcomes. Anxiety has been associated with adverse events after many surgical procedures, but its relationship relative to anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) regarding medical complications has not previously been assessed in a large database study. Methods: The 2010-Q3 2022 PearlDiver Mariner161 database was used to identify patients undergoing single-level ACDF. Those with versus without preoperative anxiety were matched 1:1 based on age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Rates of 90-day adverse events were compared by multivariate regression analyses, and 5-year cervical revision surgery rates were compared. Results: Of 287,278 ACDF patients, preoperative anxiety was identified for 36.73%. After matching, patients with anxiety had greater odds ratios of all assessed individual 90-day adverse outcomes, as well as any (OR: 3.09), severe (OR: 2.07), and minor (OR: 3.39) adverse events (P &lt; 0.0001 for all). Those with preoperative anxiety had slightly greater 5-year rates of subsequent cervical spine surgery than those without (P &lt; 0.0001, at 5 years 12.9% versus 11.7%). Discussion: ACDF patients with a history of anxiety had higher odds of many 90-day adverse outcomes and slightly higher 5-year revision surgery rates. These findings may inform patient counseling and risk management strategies.

Patient perspectives on AI: a pilot study comparing large language model and physician-generated responses to routine cervical spine surgery questions

Aim: The purpose of this study was to elucidate differences in patient perspectives on large language model (LLM) vs. physician-generated responses to frequently asked questions about anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. Methods: This cross-sectional study had three phases: In phase 1, we generated 10 common questions about ACDF surgery using ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and Google search. Phase 2 involved obtaining answers to these questions from two spine surgeons, ChatGPT-3.5, and Gemini. In phase 3, we recruited 5 cervical spine surgery patients and 5 age-matched controls to assess the clarity and completeness of the responses. Results: LLM-generated responses were significantly shorter, on average, than physician-generated responses (30.0 +/- 23.5 vs. 153.7 +/- 86.7 words, P &lt; 0.001). Study participants were more likely to rate LLM-generated responses with more positive clarity ratings (H = 6.25, P = 0.012), with no significant difference in completeness ratings (H = 0.695, P = 0.404). On an individual question basis, there were no significant differences in ratings given to LLM vs. physician-generated responses. Compared with age-matched controls, cervical spine surgery patients were more likely to rate physician-generated responses as higher in clarity (H = 6.42, P = 0.011) and completeness (H = 7.65, P = 0.006). Conclusion: Despite a small sample size, our findings indicate that LLMs offer comparable, and occasionally preferred, information in terms of clarity and comprehensiveness of responses to common ACDF questions. It is particularly striking that ratings were similar, considering LLM-generated responses were, on average, 80% shorter than physician responses. Further studies are needed to determine how LLMs can be integrated into spine surgery education in the future.

Return to Play Outcomes in Elite Athletes after Cervical and Lumbar Motion Preservation Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Systematic Review. The primary purpose of this article was to survey the present literature and report on return to play outcomes in elite athletes after undergoing motion preservation spinal surgery. For elite performance, athletes require adequate mobility and throughout the trunk, torso, and spine to achieve maximal force production. Therefore, elite athletes that have failed conservative treatment may seek to undergo motion preserving surgical options such as total disc arthroplasty and lumbar microdiscectomy. Individual studies have reported on return to play (RTP) outcomes following individual motion preservation surgical procedures, no systematic reviews have formally to reported on RTP outcomes, post-operative performance, and reoperation rates on these procedures in elite athletes. A systematic review was conducted from inception until February 2024 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. One reviewer queried PubMed for relevant studies that reported on RTP outcomes in elite athletes following motion preservation spinal surgery (MPSS) based on title and abstract (n=1,404). After the original search query, an additional reviewer screened full length articles. A total of 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. Special consideration was given to RTP rates, post-operative performance, and reoperation rates. A total of 612 elite athletes from the National Basketball Association, Major League Baseball, National Football League, National Hockey League, and other professional sporting organizations underwent cervical and lumbar MPSS to treat various spinal pathologies. Various motion sparing techniques were used to treat various pathologies. After undergoing MPSS, RTP rates ranged from 75-100% for lumbar cases and 83.3-100% for cervical cases. Most athletes successfully returned to sport between. Post-operative performance varied with some athletes performing at the same level prior to surgery and some performing at a decreased level. Motion preservation spinal surgery is a feasible option when properly indicated. Future studies are needed to compare return to sport rates, post-operative performance, and re-operation rates between motion preservation spinal surgery to spinal arthrodesis.

Obesity is an independent risk factor for postoperative pulmonary embolism after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

BACKGROUNDOver the past decade, the prevalence of obesity has risen in the United States, in parallel with the demand for anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF). Prior studies have evaluated the role of obesity classes in cervical spine surgery in smaller patient populations. We aimed to evaluate any potential correlation to a national population sample by utilizing a large multicenter database. PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to analyze obesity level's influence on perioperative complication rates in patients undergoing ACDF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGA retrospective cohort, large multicenter database study. PATIENT SAMPLEThe American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried to identify patients who had undergone an elective ACDF procedure between 2011 and 2020 using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 22551. OUTCOME MEASURESMedical and surgical complications within thirty days of operation. METHODSPatients were categorized into four BMI groups: nonobese (BMI 18.5−29.9 kg/m2), obese class I (BMI 30−34.9 kg/m2), obese class II (BMI 35−39.9 kg/m2), and obese class III (BMI ≥40 kg/m2). A univariate analysis conducted for demographic variables and preoperative comorbidities identified age, sex, race, smoking status, hypertension requiring medication, diabetes, history of congestive heart failure, history of bleeding disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as risk factors. Chi-square test was used to compare incidence of complications among groups. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was subsequently performed to adjust for these preoperative risk factors and compare obesity classes I-III to nonobese patients. RESULTSAbout 64,718 patients were identified of whom 33,365 were nonobese, 17,190 were obese class I, 8,608 were obese class II, and 5,555 were obese class III. Obese classes I-III patients had a higher incidence of surgical site infections (0. 33%, 0.36%, 0.41%, vs. 0.24%, p=.039) and pulmonary embolism (PE) (0.25%, 0.31, 0.29 vs. 0.15%, p=.003). Obese classes I-III had a lower incidence of blood transfusion (0.23%, 0.17%, 0.27% vs. 0.4%, p<.001) obese class I, obese class II, and obese class III independently increased the risk for PE (OR: 1.716, 95% CI (1.129−2.599); OR: 2.213, 95% CI (1.349−3.559); OR: 2.207, 95% CI (1.190--3.892), respectively). CONCLUSIONSRisk for postoperative PEs after an ACDF was significantly higher for obese classes I-III compared to nonobese patients. These findings may further support the use of additional prophylaxis measures and precaution in the perioperative setting.

Management and treatment algorithm of airway complications after anterior cervical spine surgery: systematic review.

Airway-related complications are rare after cervical spine surgery but can be devastating and compromise a successful outcome. The objective of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the management of airway complications after anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) and propose a treatment algorithm for approaching the patient with a compromised airway. A literature search was conducted in PubMed and adapted for use in other databases, including the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Library Health Technology Assessment Database, Embase, and the National Health Service (NHS) Economic Evaluation Database. A total of 117 papers received a full text review. Thirty-seven studies were categorized as "management" and included. An additional four references were extracted from other references for a total of 41 studies. Most of the available evidence on airway compromise after ACSS is level III or IV. Similarly, most available evidence on the management of acute airway complications comes from case reports or anecdotal publications. There are currently no methods in place to stratify the risk of airway complications in patients undergoing these guidelines on the management of these complications when they occur. This review is focused on practice, including management of such complications with a proposed treatment algorithm.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring in Chiari I malformation surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chiari Malformation Type I (CMI) is a prevalent neurosurgical condition characterized by the descent of cerebellar tonsils below the foramen magnum. Surgery, aimed at reducing symptomatology and syrinx size, presents risks, making intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) a potentially vital tool. Despite its widespread use in cervical spine surgery, the utility of IONM in CMI surgery remains controversial, with concerns over increased operative time, cost, restricted anesthetic techniques and tongue lacerations. This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Cochrane Group standards and PRISMA framework. It encompassed an extensive search through PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to December 2023, focusing on clinical and surgical outcomes of IONM in CMI surgery. Primary outcomes included the use of various IONM techniques, complication rates, clinical improvement, reoperation, and mortality. The review, registered at PROSPERO (CRD42024498996), included both prospective and retrospective studies, with rigorous selection and data extraction processes. Statistical analysis was conducted using R software. The review included 16 studies, comprising 1358 patients. It revealed that IONM techniques predominantly involved somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), followed by motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and Brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs). The estimated risk of complications with IONM was 6% (95% CI: 2-11%; I2 = 89%), lower than previously reported rates without IONM. Notably, the clinical improvement rate post-surgery was high at 99% (95% CI: 98-100%; I2 = 56%). The analysis also showed lower reoperation rates in surgeries with IONM compared to those without. Interestingly, no mortality was observed in the included studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that intraoperative neuromonitoring in Chiari I malformation surgery is associated with favorable clinical outcomes, including lower complication and reoperation rates, and high rates of clinical improvement.

Practical Answers to Frequently Asked Questions in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery for Degenerative Conditions.

Surgical counseling enables shared decision making and optimal outcomes by improving patients' understanding about their pathologies, surgical options, and expected outcomes. Here, we aimed to provide practical answers to frequently asked questions (FAQs) from patients undergoing an anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) or cervical disk replacement (CDR) for the treatment of degenerative conditions. Patients who underwent primary one-level or two-level ACDF or CDR for the treatment of degenerative conditions with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. Data were used to answer 10 FAQs that were generated from author's experience of commonly asked questions in clinic before ACDF or CDR. A total of 395 patients (181 ACDF, 214 CDR) were included. (1, 2, and 3) Will my neck/arm pain and physical function improve? Patients report notable improvement in all patient-reported outcome measures. (4) Is there a chance I will get worse? 13% (ACDF) and 5% (CDR) reported worsening. (5) Will I receive a significant amount of radiation? Patients on average received a 3.7 (ACDF) and 5.5 mGy (CDR) dose during. (6) How long will I stay in the hospital? Most patients get discharged on postoperative day one. (7) What is the likelihood that I will have a complication? 13% (8% minor and 5% major) experienced in-hospital complications (ACDF) and 5% (all minor) did (CDR). (8) Will I need another surgery? 2.2% (ACDF) and 2.3% (CDR) of patients required a revision surgery. (9 & 10) When will I be able to return to work/driving? Most patients return to working (median of 16 [ACDF] and 14 days [CDR]) and driving (median of 16 [ACDF] and 12 days [CDR]). The answers to the FAQs can assist surgeons in evidence-based patient counseling.

Rehabilitation to Improve Outcomes after Cervical Spine Surgery: Narrative Review.

The increasing elderly patient population is contributing to the rising worldwide load of cervical spinal disorders, which is expected to result in a global increase in the number of surgical procedures in the foreseeable future. Cervical rehabilitation plays a crucial role in optimal recovery after cervical spine surgeries. Nevertheless, there is no agreement in the existing research regarding the most suitable postsurgical rehabilitation program. Consequently, this review assesses the ideal rehabilitation approach for adult patients following cervical spine operations. This review covers activities of daily living and encompasses diverse treatment methods, including physiotherapy, specialized tools, and guidance for everyday activities. The review is organized under three headings: (1) historical perspectives, (2) patient-reported functional outcomes, and (3) general and disease-specific rehabilitation. Rehabilitation programs are determined on the basis of patient-reported outcomes, performance tests, and disease prognosis. CSM requires strengthening of the neck and shoulder muscles that have been surgically invaded. In contrast, the CCI requires mobility according to the severity of the spinal cord injury and functional prognosis. The goal of rehabilitation for CCTs, as for CCIs, is to achieve ambulation, but the prognosis and impact of cancer treatment must be considered. Rehabilitation of the cervical spine after surgery is essential for improving physical function and the ability to perform daily activities and enhancing overall quality of life. The rehabilitation process should encompass general as well as disease-specific exercises. While current rehabilitation protocols heavily focus on strengthening muscles, they often neglect the crucial aspect of spinal balance. Therefore, giving equal attention to muscle reinforcement and the enhancement of spinal balance following surgery on the cervical spine is vital.

Case Report: Glossopharyngeal Allodynia-Related Odynophagia and Dysphagia Post Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Managed with Glossopharyngeal Nerve Block.

Dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery has a 5% to 15% incidence beyond 1-year postsurgery, often attributed to mechanical factors such as pharyngeal thickening and epiglottis inversion. Despite normal neurological examination and electromyography, nerve distortion related to stretching also remains a possibility in these patients and may cause allodynia resulting in odynophagia and dysphagia. Current treatment options for dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion are limited to local intraoperative steroid injections and tracheal traction exercises. In our patient, a glossopharyngeal nerve block was effectively used to manage the glossopharyngeal allodynia, thereby reducing the odynophagia and dysphagia, ultimately enhancing oral tolerance.

The effect of high-normal preoperative international normalized ratios on postoperative outcomes and complications following posterior cervical spine surgery

IntroductionCurrent guidelines recommend that the International Normalized Ratio (INR) be less than 1.5 prior to spine intervention. Recent studies have shown that an INR > 1.25 is associated worse outcomes following anterior cervical surgery. We sought to determine the risk of complications associated with an INR > 1.25 following elective posterior cervical surgery.MethodsThe American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried. Patients undergoing elective posterior cervical surgery from 2012 to 2016 with an INR level within 24 h of surgery were included. Primary outcomes were hematoma requiring surgery, 30-day mortality, and transfusions within 72-hours. There were 815 patients in the INR ≤ 1 cohort (Cohort A), 410 patients in the 1 < INR ≤ 1.25 cohort (Cohort B), and 33 patients in the 1.25 < INR ≤ 1.5 cohort (Cohort C).ResultsCohort C had a higher rate of transfusion (4% Cohort A; 6% Cohort B; 12% Cohort C; p = 0.028) and the rate of mortality within 30 days postoperatively trended toward significance (0.4% Cohort A; 0.5% Cohort B; 3% Cohort C; p = 0.094). There was no significant difference in the rate of postoperative hematoma formation requiring surgery (0.2% Cohort A; 0% Cohort B; 0% Cohort C; p = 0.58). On multivariate analysis, increasing INR was not associated with an increased risk of developing a major complication.ConclusionAn INR > 1.25 but ≤ 1.5 may be safe for posterior cervical surgery. An INR > 1.25 but ≤ 1.5 was associated with a significantly higher rate of transfusions. However, increasing INR was not significantly associated with increased risk of any of the major complications.

Increased Change in Cervical Lordosis is Associated With Decreased Rate of Recovery in Patients With C5 Palsy.

A retrospective chart review. The authors aim to investigate the role of clinical and radiographic parameters in patients who underwent posterior cervical surgery, and their association with C5 palsy severity and time to recovery. Postoperative C5 palsy affects 1%-30% of patients undergoing posterior decompression, with or without fusion. Causation and avoidance of this complication remain widely debated. A single institution review of patients who underwent posterior cervical spine surgery was focused on using specific Common Procedural Technology codes associated with the patient population of interest. Patients were excluded if they had inadequate pre and postoperative imaging, as well as a history of prior cervical spine surgery, concurrent anterior surgery, intradural pathology, spinal tumor, or spinal trauma. Radiographic measurements of the pre and postoperative images were completed with subsequent intraclass correlation coefficient analysis to confirm the precision of measurements. Out of 105 total patients, 35 (33%) patients developed a C5 palsy. Twenty-four (69%) of those palsies completely resolved, with a median time to recovery of 8 months. Preoperative demographics and radiographic parameters demonstrated heterogeneity among those patients who did and did not have a resolution of palsy. Patients with increased change in C2-C7 lordosis (P = 0.011) after surgery were associated with decreased likelihood of recovery. Patients without a smoking history (P = 0.009) had an increased likelihood of recovering from C5 palsy. The degree of increased lordosis in the treatment of degenerative cervical disease plays a role in the rate of recovery from C5 palsy. This should be considered during preoperative planning in determining the amount of lordosis desired. In addition, patients without a smoking history were associated with a higher rate of recovery. Level IV.

Table-mounted Versus Self-retaining Retraction: An Assessment of Postoperative Dysphagia Following Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery.

Retrospective study. To determine whether there are significant differences in postoperative dysphagia when using table-mounted versus self-retaining retractor tools. Retraction of prevertebral structures during anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) is commonly associated with postoperative dysphagia or dysphonia. Retractors commonly used include nonfixed self-retaining retraction devices or fixed table-mounted retractor arms. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding differences in dysphagia between retractor types. Patients who underwent ACSS and adhered to a minimum of 6-month follow-up were retrospectively evaluated. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were compared between table-mounted and self-retaining retractor groups at the preoperative and final postoperative time points, including the SWAL-QOL survey for dysphagia. Categorical dysphagia was assessed using previously defined values for the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Overall, 117 and 75 patients received self-retaining or table-mounted retraction. Average follow-up was significantly longer in the self-retaining cohort (14.8±15.0mo) than in the table-mounted group (9.4±7.8, P=0.005). No differences were detected in swallowing function (P=0.918) or operative time (P=0.436), although 3-level procedures were significantly shortened with table-mounted retraction (P=0.005). Multivariate analysis trended toward worse swallow function with increased operative levels (P=0.072) and increased retraction time (P=0.054), although the retractor used did not predict swallowing function (P=0.759). However, categorical rates of postoperative dysphagia were lower with table-mounted retraction (13.3% vs. 27.4%, P=0.033). There was no significant difference observed in long-term swallowing dysfunction between patients who underwent ACSS with self-retaining and table-mounted retractors, although the rate of dysphagia was lower with table-mounted retraction. In addition, the greater number of operated levels per case in the table-mounted group at a similar time suggests improved efficiency.

Impact of incidental dural tears on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND CONTEXTIncidental dural tear (DT) during cervical spine surgery is a feared complication. However, its impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) remains unclear. PURPOSETo determine the influence of DTs on PROs 1 year after cervical spine surgery. STUDY DESIGNRetrospective cohort. PATIENT SAMPLEPatients undergoing elective cervical spine surgery for cervical spondylosis, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), and cervical disc herniation. OUTCOME MEASURESAnalysis included patients’ characteristics, perioperative complications, and PROs both preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. METHODSThis study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent elective cervical spine surgery at 13 high-volume spine centers. All patients were required to complete questionnaires both preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively, which included PROs such as numerical rating scales of pain or dysesthesia for each part of the body, Neck Disability Index NDI, and Core Outcome Measures Index. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence (DT+) or absence (DT-) of dural injury. Comparisons were made regarding patient background, perioperative complications, and pre and postoperative PROs. Propensity score matching was also utilized to adjust for patient background, and further comparisons were made regarding complication rates and PROs. RESULTSOut of 2,704 patients, dural tears were identified in 97 (3.6%) cases. The DT+ group had a significantly higher proportion of fixation surgeries, upper cervical surgeries, OPLL, and revision surgeries. Perioperative complications were significantly higher in the DT+ group, including intraoperative nerve damage, postoperative paralysis, surgical site infections (SSI), and cerebrovascular complications. Outcomes collected from 2,163 patients (79.9%) revealed significantly more severe neck and upper limb pain in the DT+ group. After propensity score matching, significant differences persisted in postoperative paralysis and SSI in the DT+ group, but no significant differences were observed in PROs. CONCLUSIONSPatients with dural tears showed nearly equivalent postoperative outcomes at 1 year following cervical spine surgery compared to those without dural tears. However, the incidence of perioperative complications was higher, emphasizing the need for careful management.

Cervical Collar Use Following Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.

The utility and risks associated with the use of cervical collars in the postoperative period after cervical spine surgery have been of debate. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the currently available evidence on the use of cervical collars after cervical spine surgery to assess their impact on outcomes. A literature search of the PubMed database was performed using keywords "cervical collar," "anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)," "posterior cervical decompression and fusion," "laminoplasty," "post-operative orthotic bracing," "cervical decompression," and "cervical orthosis" in all possible combinations. All English studies with the level of evidence of I to IV that were published from May 1, 1986, to December 3, 2023, were considered for inclusion. A total of 25 articles meeting the inclusion criteria were identified and reviewed. Regarding anterior and posterior fusion procedures, cervical collar use demonstrated improved short-term patient-reported outcomes and pain control. While surgeon motivation for collar use was to increase fusion rates, this is not well drawn out in the literature with the majority of studies demonstrated no significant difference in fusion rates between patients who wore a cervical collar and those who did not. Regarding motion-preserving procedures such as cervical laminoplasty, patients with prolonged postoperative cervical collar use demonstrated increased rates of axial neck pain and decreased final range of motion (ROM). Surgeon motivation for postoperative cervical collar immobilization after completion of fusion procedures is to increase fusion rates and improve postoperative pain and disability despite this not being fully drawn out in the literature. After completion of motion-sparing procedures, the benefits of collar immobilization diminish with their prolonged use which could lead to increased rates of axial neck pain and decreased ROM. Cervical collar immobilization in the postoperative period should be considered its own intervention, with its own associated risk-benefit profile. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.