Cervical Pedicle Screw Research Articles

Comparison of different imaging devices and navigation systems for cervical pedicle screw placement: an experimental study on screw accuracy, screw placement time and radiation dose.

Cervical pedicle screws (CPS) provide biomechanically superior fixation compared to other techniques but are technically more demanding. Navigated CPS placement has been increasingly reported as a safe and accurate technique, yet there are few studies comparing different combinations of imaging and navigation systems under comparable conditions. With this study, we aimed to compare different imaging and navigation systems for CPS placement in terms of accuracy, screw placement time and applied radiation dose. For this experimental study, navigated CPS placement was performed at levels C2 to C7 in 24 identical radiopaque artificial spine models by two surgeons with different levels of experience using three different combinations of intraoperative 3D imaging devices and navigation systems. Accuracy, time and radiation dose were compared between the groups. In total, 288 screws were placed. Accuracy was > 98% in all groups with no significant differences between groups or between surgeons (P = 0.30 and P = 0.31, respectively), but the inexperienced surgeon required significantly more time (P < 0.001). Radiation dose was significantly higher with iCT compared to CBCT (P < 0.0001). Under experimental conditions, accuracy rates of > 98% were achieved for navigated CPS placement regardless of the imaging modality or navigation system used. Radiation doses were significantly lower for CBCT compared to iCT guidance.

Mazor X robot-assisted upper and lower cervical pedicle screw fixation: a case report and literature review

BackgroundManual placement of cervical pedicle screws is risky, and robot-assisted placement of atlantoaxial pedicle screws has not been reported.Case reportWe describe a 74-year-old female patient with atlantoaxial fracture and dislocation combined with spinal cord injury caused by a car accident. The left lower limb muscle strength was grade 0, the right upper limb muscle strength was grade 1, and the right lower limb muscle strength was grade 2. Loss of sensation below the clavicle level, decreased superficial sensation in the extremities, loss of deep sensation in the left lower extremity, and incontinence were observed. We successfully placed atlas pedicle screws with the assistance of the Mazor X robot. One week after the operation, radiological imaging revealed that the reduction effect was good, the placement of the pedicle screws was satisfactory, the left upper limb and left lower limb muscle strength was level 2, the right upper limb and the muscle strength of the right lower limb were grade 3, and the sensory function was partially restored. No complications related to screw placement were found at the 3-month postoperative follow-up.ConclusionsMazor X robot-assisted descending pedicle screw fixation of the atlas is feasible and safe.

A Complete Facet Resection and Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Enhances Both Gross Total Resection and Motion Preservation for the Cervical Spinal Dumbbell Tumor

To describe single-index-level fusion surgery using a cervical pedicle screw (CPS) after the complete facet resection of spinal dumbbell tumors and to compare it with partial facet resection without fusion. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent surgery for dumbbell-shaped cervical spine tumors. They were categorized into the fused group (complete facet resection with fusion using CPS) and the unfused group (partial facet resection without fusion). We compared demographics, tumor characteristics, resection rates (gross total, subtotal, or partial), and regrowth rates between the groups. Complete facet resection was performed for maximal tumor removal. In the fused group, single-index-level fusion was achieved using CPS. Despite tumor-associated erosion of the index vertebra's pedicle and/or lateral mass, the CPS was directly inserted into the vertebral body through an imaginary virtual pedicle without a lateral mass or pedicle purchase. A total of 34 patients underwent surgery for dumbbell-shaped cervical tumors; half were classified into each group. There were no significant differences in demographic or tumor characteristics, including Asazuma classification, or histological diagnosis (P > 0.05). However, the gross total resection rate was significantly higher in the fused group (16/17, 94.1% vs. 9/17, 52.9%; P value= 0.011). Tumor recurrence was observed in 3 (17.6%) patients in the unfused group; no recurrence (0%) occurred in the fused group. Complete facet resection with fusion using CPS significantly increased the gross total tumor removal rate, compared with partial resection without fusion. Therefore, CPS improved fusion surgery for maximal motion preservation, resulting in single-level fusion surgery.

Accuracy of Cervical Pedicle Screw Insertion With and Without a Navigation-Linked High-Speed Drill: A Retrospective Clinical Study.

Cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation provides high stability but poses a risk of nerve and vascular injury. Although useful for reducing CPS deviation rates, navigation systems cannot completely eliminate deviation. This study aimed to compare two methods for creating insertion paths, one using a navigation-linked high-speed drill (NAVI drill) and the other using conventional manual probing. Our study comprised 104 patients with 509 CPSs at the C3-6 level who were treated at our institution between 2017 and 2023. CPS deviations were graded according to the Neo classification system, and the deviation direction (medial, lateral, cranial, or caudal) was assessed. Complications associated with CPS deviation were also investigated. We compared cases that used the NAVI drill (Group M) with those that used manual probing (Group N). Group M included 45 cases (252 screws), and Group N included 59 cases (257 screws). The CPS deviation rate was grade 1 or higher in 14.7% and 17.1% of cases in Groups M and N, respectively (p = 0.469). It was grade 2 or higher in 1.2% and 4.3% of cases in Groups M and N, respectively (p = 0.222). The medial, lateral, caudal, and cranial deviation direction rates were 56.8%, 2.7%, 40.5%, and 0% in Group M and 13.6%, 72.7%, 11.4%, and2.3% in Group N, respectively (p < 0.001). In one case in Group N, a grade 3 lateral deviation resulted in vertebral artery injury (VAI). The use of the NAVI drill was associated with a slightly lower, albeit insignificant, CPS deviation rate. However, it significantly lowered the proportion of lateral deviations. Therefore, the NAVI drill is a useful tool for preventing VAI.

Posterior-only approach cervical hemivertebrectomy and short fusion with pedicle screws in young children with cervical scoliosis: case report and technical note.

Cervical hemivertebrae (C3-6) causing significant osseous torticollis, head tilt and facial asymmetry are rare and complicated. Cervical hemivertebrectomy (CHVE) by a posterior-only approach was never reported because it is highly risky and its efficacy remains controversial. This study is to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary clinical outcomes of posterior-only approach for CHVE and torticollis correction in young children. Four young children aged 5-9 years old with significant torticollis caused by cervical hemivertebrae underwent deformity correction consisting of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement with O-arm-based intraoperative navigation, CHVE using ultrasonic bone scalpel and short-segmental posterior instrumentation and fusion. Details of this novel technique were presented. The preliminary short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed. On average, the operative time was 312.5 ± 49.9min, and the surgical blood loss was 375.0 ± 150.0ml. The structural cervical scoliosis was corrected from 31.5 ± 7.3° to 11.0 ± 4.1°, and the average correction rate was 64.9%. Head tilt was favorably corrected from 11.0 ± 4.2° to 3.5 ± 2.6°. The shoulder balance improved from 6.3 ± 1.3° to 1.5 ± 1.9°. One case with C6 CHVE had convex side radiating nerve root pain but no sign of muscle power weakness. Full recovery was achieved one month after surgery. No other complication occurred. CHVE by a posterior-only approach was a feasible alternative option for the treatment of congenital cervical scoliosis. It could resect the CHV effectively and achieve satisfactory torticollis correction without additional anterior access surgery. Successful CPS placement in this child population was essentially important to enable reliable osteotomy closure and firm posterior instrumentation.

Pedicle screw placement in the cervical vertebrae using augmented reality-head mounted displays: a cadaveric proof-of-concept study

BackgroundThe accurate and safe positioning of cervical pedicle screws is crucial. While augmented reality (AR) use in spine surgery has previously demonstrated clinical utility in the thoracolumbar spine, its technical feasibility in the cervical spine remains less explored. PurposeThe objective of this study was to assess the precision and safety of AR-assisted pedicle screw placement in the cervical spine. Study DesignIn this experimental study, 5 cadaveric cervical spine models were instrumented from C3 to C7 by 5 different spine surgeons. The navigation accuracy and clinical screw accuracy were evaluated. MethodsPostprocedural CT scans were evaluated for clinical accuracy by 2 independent neuroradiologists using the Gertzbein-Robbins scale. Technical precision was assessed by calculating the angular trajectory (°) and linear screw tip (mm) deviations in the axial and sagittal planes from the virtual pedicle screw position as recorded by the AR-guided platform during the procedure compared to the actual pedicle screw position derived from postprocedural imaging. ResultsA total of forty-one pedicle screws were placed in 5 cervical cadavers, with each of the 5 surgeons navigating at least 7 screws. Gertzbein-Robbins grade of A or B was achieved in 100% of cases. The mean values for tip and trajectory errors in the axial and sagittal planes between the virtual versus actual position of the screws was less than 3 mm and 30°, respectively (p<.05). None of the cervical screws violated the cortex by more than 2 mm or displaced neurovascular structures. ConclusionsAR-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement in cadavers demonstrated clinical accuracy comparable to existing literature values for image-guided navigation methods for the cervical spine. Clinical SignificanceThis study provides technical and clinical accuracy data that supports clinical trialing of AR-assisted subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement.

Pars interarticularis screws for posterior cervical fusion – investigating a new trajectory using a CT-based multiplanar reconstruction: Part I

BackgroundLateral mass screw fixation is the standard for posterior cervical fusion between C3 and C6. Traditional trajectories stabilize but carry risks, including nerve root and vertebral artery injuries. Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) is gaining popularity, but trajectories present anatomical challenges.Research Question.This study proposes a novel pars interarticularis screw trajectory to address these issues and enhance in-line instrumentation with cervical pedicle screws.Materials and MethodsA retrospective analysis of reformatted cervical CT scans included 10 patients. Measurements of the pars interarticularis morphology were performed on 80 segments (C3-C6). Two pars interarticularis screw trajectories were evaluated: Trajectory A (upper outer quadrant entry, horizontal trajectory) and Trajectory B (lower outer quadrant entry, cranially pointed trajectory). These were compared to standard lateral mass and cervical pedicle screw trajectories, assessing screw lengths, angles, and potential risks to the spinal canal and transverse foramen.ResultsTrajectory B showed significantly longer pars lengths (15.69 ± 0.65 mm) compared to Trajectory A (12.51 ± 0.24 mm; p < 0.01). Lateral mass screw lengths were comparable to pars interarticularis screw lengths using Trajectory B. Both trajectories provided safe angular ranges, minimizing the risk to delicate structures.Discussionand Conclusion.Pars interarticularis screws offer a viable alternative to lateral mass screws for posterior cervical fusion, especially in MISS contexts. Trajectory B, in particular, presents a feasible and safe alternative, reducing the risk of vertebral artery and spinal cord injury. Preoperative assessment and intraoperative technologies are essential for successful implementation. Biomechanical validation is needed before clinical application.

Feasibility and safety report on robotic assistance for cervical pedicle screw fixation: a cadaveric study

This cadaveric study aimed to evaluate the safety and usability of a novel robotic system for posterior cervical pedicle screw fixation. Three human cadaveric specimens and C2-T3 were included. Freshly frozen human cadaver specimens were prepared and subjected to robot-assisted posterior cervical pedicle screw fixation using the robotic system. The accuracy of screw placement, breach rate, and critical structure violations were evaluated. The results were statistically compared with those of previous studies that used different robotic systems for cervical pedicle screw fixation. The robotic system demonstrated a high accuracy rate in screw placement. A significant number of screws were placed within predetermined safe zones. The total entry offset was 1.08 ± 0.83 mm, the target offset was 1.86 ± 0.50 mm, and the angle offset was 2.14 ± 0.77°. Accuracy rates comparable with those of previous studies using different robotic systems were achieved. The system was also feasible, allowing precise navigation and real-time feedback during the procedure. This cadaveric study validated the safety and usability of the novel robotic system for posterior cervical pedicle screw fixation. The system exhibited high precision in screw placement, and the results support the extension of the indications for robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation from the lumbar spine to the cervical spine.

Comparison of iCT-based navigation and fluoroscopic-guidance for atlantoaxial screw placement in 78 patients with traumatic cervical spine injuries

Background contextStudies have shown biomechanical superiority of cervical pedicle screw placement over other techniques. However, accurate placement is challenging due to the inherent risk of neurovascular complications. Navigation technology based on intraoperative 3D imaging allows highly accurate screw placement, yet studies specifically investigating screw placement in patients with traumatic atlantoaxial injuries are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare atlantoaxial screw placement as treatment of traumatic instabilities using iCT-based navigation or fluoroscopic-guidance with intraoperative 3D control scans.MethodsThis was a retrospective review of patients with traumatic atlantoaxial injuries treated operatively with dorsal stabilization of C1 and C2. Patients were either assigned to the intraoperative navigation or fluoroscopic-guidance group. Screw accuracy, procedure time, and revisions were compared.ResultsSeventy-eight patients were included in this study with 51 patients in the navigation group and 27 patients in the fluoroscopic-guidance group. In total, 312 screws were placed in C1 and C2. Screw accuracy was high in both groups; however, pedicle perforations > 1 mm occurred significantly more often in the fluoroscopic-guidance group (P = 0.02). Procedure time was on average 23 min shorter in the navigation group (P = 0.02).ConclusionsThis study contributes to the available data showing that navigated atlantoaxial screw placement proves to be feasible as well as highly accurate compared to the fluoroscopic-guidance technique without prolonging the time needed for surgery. When comparing these data with other studies, the application of different classification systems for assessment of screw accuracy should be considered.

Comparison of Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy With Robotic Guidance System Versus Image Guidance System Using Propensity Score Matching.

A retrospective study. To compare the accuracy of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement using a robotic guidance system (RGS) with that of using an image guidance system (IGS; navigation system) through propensity score matching. The RGS may provide accurate CPS placement, which may outperform IGS. However, no study has directly compared the accuracy of CPS placement with the RGS to that with the IGS. We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who had undergone cervical fusion surgery using CPS with the RGS or IGS. To adjust for potential confounders (patient demographic characteristics, disease etiology, and registration material), propensity score matching was performed, creating robotic guidance (RG) and matched image guidance (IG) groups. The accuracy of CPS placement from C2 to C6, where the vertebral artery runs, was evaluated on postoperative computed tomography images according to the Neo classification (grade 0 to grade 3). Furthermore, the intraoperative CPS revisions and related complications were examined. Using propensity score matching, 22 patients were included in the RG and matched groups each, and a total of 95 and 105 CPSs, respectively, were included in the analysis. In both the axial and sagittal planes, the clinically acceptable rate (grades 0 + 1) of CPS placement did not differ between the RG and matched IG groups (97.9% vs 94.3% and 95.8% vs 96.2%, respectively). The incidence of CPS revision was similar between the groups (2.1% vs 2.9%), and no CPS-related complications were documented. Meanwhile, the incidence of lateral breach (grades 1 + 2 + 3) was significantly lower in the RG group than in the matched IG group (1.1% vs 7.7%, P= 0.037). The RGS and IGS can equally aid in accurate and safe CPS placement in clinical settings. Nonetheless, RGS can further reduce the lateral breach, compared with IGS.

Impact of osteosclerosis on cervical pedicle screw insertion using preoperative CT-based navigation.

Preoperative computed tomography (CT)-based navigation is used for cervical pedicle screw (CPS) insertion to mitigate the risk of spinal cord and vertebral artery injury. In vertebrae with osteosclerosis due to degeneration or other factors, however, probing may not proceed easily, with difficulty creating the CPS insertion hole. This study investigated the impact of osteosclerosis on the accuracy of CPS insertion. A total of 138 patients with CPS inserted at the C3-C7 level using preoperative CT navigation were retrospectively analyzed. Pre- and postoperative CT was employed to investigate screw position and Hounsfield unit (HU) values at the lateral mass to evaluate the degree of osteosclerosis in the CPS insertion pathway. Among 561 CPS insertions, the Grade 3 perforation rate was 1.8%, and the Grade 2 or higher perforation rate was 8.0%. When comparing insertions with and without CPS perforation, HU values were significantly higher in the perforation group (578 ± 191 vs. 318 ± 191, p < 0.01). The frequency of CPS insertion into the mid-cervical spine was also significantly greater in the perforation group (68.9% vs. 62.5%, p < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis revealed that a high HU value at the lateral mass (odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.11, p < 0.01) was a significant independent factor associated with CPS deviation. The screw perforation rate of Grade 2 or higher in CPS insertion using preoperative CT-based navigation was 8.0%. Since osteosclerosis was an independent factor related to CPS deviation, additional care may be required during insertion into affected vertebrae.

Research into the anatomy of the subaxial cervical pedicle for ensuring screw insertion safety.

The study aimed to determine the optimal entry points and trajectories for posterior subaxial cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation. Computed tomography (CT) and Mimics software were used to evaluate the subaxial cervical pedicle in 42 cervical spine CT scans. The width of the cervical pedicle was measured and compared at medial angulations of 30°, 35°, 40°, 45°, 50°, 55°, and 60° relative to the midline sagittal plane. Based on an observational examination of the positions of all cervical 3-dimensional models and screws, the proposed entry point for C3-7 CPS was analyzed. Although the variations in C3-6 pedicle width (PW) among 45°, 50°, and 55° were not statistically significant, they were significantly larger than the differences among 30°, 35°, 40°, and 60° angles (P < .05). The differences in C7 PW between the 30°, 35°, 40°, and 45° angles were not statistically different even though the 30°, 35°, 40°, and 45° angles were significantly bigger. (P < .05). The proposed entry point for C3-7 CPS was below the junction of the lateral and lower borders of the superior articular process joint surface. The entry point for C3-7 levels was below the junction of the lateral and lower borders of the superior articular process joint surface. The optimal medial angulation for the posterior C3-6 CPS was 45°-55° and that for the posterior C7 CPS was 30°-45°. The sagittal angle of the posterior C3-7 CPS was parallel to the corresponding upper endplate.

Modified Tap-drilling Technique for Mid-cervical Pedicle Screw Placement: A Case Series of 473 Consecutive Screws.

Retrospective cohort study. To report our modified tap-drilling technique for mid-cervical pedicle screw placement and to evaluate its safety and accuracy. Cervical pedicle screw fixation, which provides a strong stabilization, has been a major concern due to the potential risks to neurovascular structures despite its increasing use. Several insertion techniques have been described so far to improve the cervical pedicle screw placement accuracy. This study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent mid-cervical (C3-C6) pedicle screw fixation between September 2005 and September 2020. Laminectomy, laminoforaminotomy, or notch-referred anatomic landmark methods were used to adjust the entry point and the direction of the screws. After the cortical bone was removed at the entry point with a diamond burr, the cancellous bone was slowly drilled with a hand drill starting from 8 to 10 millimeters in length. Then, all of the bone walls were checked with a ball-tip probe to determine if there was any breach. The procedure was repeated several times. After completing the drilling, the screw was inserted without tapping. The breach rate of pedicle screws was analyzed on postoperative computed tomography scans. A total of 473 mid-cervical pedicle screws were placed in 122 consecutive patients. No navigation or computer-assisted system was used, and the first 2 authors inserted all of the screws. All patients completed the surgery, and no evident intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperative CT scans were obtained for 405 screws. Although deviation was observed for 131 pedicle screws, a critical deviation was observed for only 25 pedicle screws. Cervical pedicle screw insertion is a risky but applicable technique. Checking all of the bone walls with a ball-tip probe before gradually advancing the hand drill in small amounts, as presented in this article, may lead to the safe and effective placement of cervical pedicle screws.

T1 Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy With Subaxial Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation.

Patients suffering from ankylosing spondylitis are not only predisposed to the development of rigid cervicothoracic deformities but are also at an increased risk of cervical fractures. Deformity correction and stabilization are particularly challenging in this patient population due to the brittle bone quality and low bone mineral density. Thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy is a workhorse approach for the correction of focal severe kyphotic deformity with lower complication rates than 3-column osteotomy. Successful execution of an upper thoracic PSO requires careful presurgical planning as well as anticipation of the patient's postoperative needs. Here, we describe the use of a T1 PSO in the correction of a rigid cervicothoracic chin-on-chest deformity in a patient with AS. The risk of implant failure was reduced by the use of a multi-rod construct, navigated cervical pedicle screws, and dual-pitched thoracic pedicle screws.

The Efficacy of Cervical Pedicle Screw Is Enhanced When Used With 5.5-mm Rods for Metastatic Cervical Spinal Tumor Surgery.

The cervical spine presents challenges in treating metastatic cervical spinal tumors (MCSTs). Although the efficacy of cervical pedicle screw placement (CPS) has been well established, its use in combination with 5.5-mm rods for MCST has not been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CPS combined with 5.5-mm rods in treating MCST and compare it with that of CPS combined with traditional 3.5-mm rods. This retrospective study analyzed 58 patients with MCST who underwent posterior cervical spinal fusion surgery by a single surgeon between March 2012 and December 2022. Data included demographics, surgical details, imaging results, numerical rating scale score for neck pain, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire responses. Preoperative Spinal Instability Neoplastic Scores were significantly higher in the 5.5-mm rod group. Greater kyphotic changes in the index vertebra were observed in the 3.5-mm rod group. Neck pain reduction was significantly better in the 5.5-mm rod group. CPS with 5.5-mm rods provides superior biomechanical stability and effectively resists forward bending momentum in posterior MCST fusion surgery. These findings support the use of 5.5-mm rods to enhance surgical outcomes.

CT-navigated C2 Pedicle Screw insertion using dynamic reference array on C2 spinous process: A Novel Technique

ntroduction: Spine surgeons have endeavoured to improve the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion. Computed tomography (CT) guided navigation has been helpful in precisely passing pedicle screws even further accurately but, there were shortcomings noted with the technique due to movement between reference frame and anatomical landmarks, especially in the cervical spine which led to injury of vital neurovascular structures. Thus, there was a need for developing a technique which would eliminate the inherent error due to movement in the vertebral body while passing screws. Research Question: Can using C2 spinous process as an attachment for the reference array improve accuracy of C2 pedicle screws. Material and Methods: We prospectively studied data of 10 patients (20 screws) in whom Computed tomography navigated C2 pedicle screws insertion was carried out using the reference array on C2 spinous process. Accuracy of pedicle screws were confirmed by post instrumentation Computed tomography scan immediately intra operatively. Results: With the presented technique overall breach rate was 5% with one screw having a medial breach of grade 1 with no incidence of neurovascular injury or need for further revision. Discussion and Conclusion: Results from this study shows better accuracy than other techniques described to pass C2 pedicle screws eliminating the error in movement from the cervical vertebrae and the reference frame being nearest to the C2 pedicle. Although there is a learning curve with the adoption of the navigation system, with experience, the challenges associated with Cervical pedicle screws (CPS) insertion can be overcome.

Design, fabrication, and evaluation of single- and multi-level 3D-printed non-covering cervical spinal fusion surgery templates.

Cervical spinal fusion surgeries require accurate placement of the pedicle screws. Any misplacement/misalignment of these screws may lead to injuries to the spinal cord, arteries and other organs. Template guides have emerged as accurate and cost-effective tools for the safe and rapid insertions of pedicle screws. Novel patient-specific single- and multi-level non-covering templates for cervical pedicle screw insertions were designed, 3D-printed, and evaluated. CT scans of two patients were acquired to reconstruct their 3D spine model. Two sets of single-level (C3-C7) and multi-level (C4-C6) templates were designed and 3D-printed. Pedicle screws were inserted into the 3D-printed vertebrae by free-hand and guided techniques. For single-level templates, a total of 40 screws (2 patients × 5 vertebrae × 2 methods × 2 screws) and for multi-level templates 24 screws (2 patients × 3 vertebrae × 2 methods × 2 screws) were inserted by an experienced surgeon. Postoperative CT images were acquired to measure the errors of the entry point, 3D angle, as well as axial and sagittal plane angles of the inserted screws as compared to the initial pre-surgery designs. Accuracy of free-hand and guided screw insertions, as well as those of the single- and multi-level guides, were also compared using paired t-tests. Despite the minimal removal of soft tissues, the 3D-printed templates had acceptable stability on the vertebrae during drillings and their utilization led to statistically significant reductions in all error variables. The mean error of entry point decreased from 3.02mm (free-hand) to 0.29mm (guided) using the single-level templates and from 5.7mm to 0.76mm using the multi-level templates. The percentage reduction in mean of other error variables for, respectively, single- and multi-level templates were as follows: axial plane angle: 72% and 87%, sagittal plane angle: 56% and 78%, and 3D angle: 67% and 83%. The error variables for the multi-level templates generally exceeded those of the single-level templates. The use of single- and multi-level templates also considerably reduced the duration of pedicle screw placements. The novel single- and multi-level non-covering templates are valuable tools for the accurate placement of cervical pedicle screws.

Cervical pedicle screw placement with patient-specific 3d-printed guides: accuracy and safety in a clinical experience

Cervical pedicle screw placement with patient-specific 3d-printed guides: accuracy and safety in a clinical experience

Accuracy and Safety Assessment of Subaxial Cervical Pedicle Screw Instrumentation: A Systematic Review

Accuracy and Safety Assessment of Subaxial Cervical Pedicle Screw Instrumentation: A Systematic Review

CT correlation of spinal canal diameter with pedicle size for safer posterior cervical pedicle screw fixation.

Utilizing computed tomography (CT) studies, we correlated cervical spinal canal diameters (SCDs) with pedicle size between the C3 and C7 levels to more safely perform posterior cervical surgery. We retrospectively analyzed CT studies for 71 patients with cranial or spinal disorders and correlated the cervical SCD with the pedicle outer width (POW) between the C3 and C7 levels. Patients were divided into normal (SCD ≥12 mm at any level, n = 30) and stenosis groups (SCD <12 mm at any level, n = 41). C7 exhibited the largest SCD and POW values, while C3 and C4 exhibited the smallest SCD and POW values. Moderate correlations (r = 0.3, P = 0.002) were observed at the C3 and C4 levels but no significant correlations were observed from the C5 to C7 levels. For SCD values, the normal group demonstrated significantly greater values between the C3 and C7 levels versus the stenosis group. For POW values, only the C4 level differed significantly between the two groups (P = 0.014, Mann-Whitney U-test). Preoperative pedicle size evaluation remains an essential manoeuvre before performing cervical C3-C7 pedicle screw placement. In 71 cervical CT studies, we found no consistent correlation between POW and SCD values, indicating that it is difficult to estimate POW values based on spinal canal size.