Cervical Nucleoplasty Research Articles

Analysis of the clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty: A case-control study.

Percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty (PCN) is a simple, safe, and effective treatment for contained cervical herniated intervertebral disc (CHIVD). However, few studies have compared the actual benefits of PCN against conservative treatment (CT), either clinically or radiographically. The present study sought to analyze and to compare the outcomes of symptomatic contained CHIVD treated with PCN or CT. The present study was designed as a case-control comparative study. Patients who indicated for PCN after a failed CT for more than 6 months were recruited. After the exclusion of some patients who did not meet the selection criteria of the study, we finally enrolled 71 patients treated with PCN. In addition, another 21 patients who indicated for PCN but finally chose to receive CT continuously were also enrolled and categorized as the control group. All patients completed the 6-month follow-up. Pain levels and functional outcomes were evaluated pre- and post-operatively by assessing the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Radiographic images of 72 of 104 intervened segments were collected to measure disc height and other cervical spinal alignments, such as range of motion, C2-7 Cobb's angle, and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis. Compared with the CT group, the PCN group showed significantly better outcomes on VAS, ODI, and NDI at the 1-month post-operative follow-up, which continued through at least the 6-month follow-up (P < 0.01 for VAS and P < 0.05 for ODI and NDI). The mean disc height significantly decreased, from 6.04 ± 0.85 mm to 5.76 ± 1.02 mm, 3 months after PCN treatment (P = 0.003). However, the degree of disc height decrease did not correlate with the changes of the substantial VAS improvement. To provide therapeutic benefits for symptomatic contained CHIVD patients after an invalid CT for 6 months, PCN seems to be a better option than CT. The reduced disc heights did not alter the clinical outcomes of PCN.

Long-Term Clinical Results of Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

PurposePercutaneous cervical nucleoplasty (PCN) is a minimally invasive treatment for cervical radicular pain due to a disc herniation. Preliminary results show equivalent patient-reported outcomes of PCN as compared to conventional anterior cervical discectomy. However, there is a paucity of long-term outcome data. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to investigate the long-term clinical results of PCN.Patients and MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent PCN at a secondary referral center between 2010 and 2014. Before surgery and five days after surgery, numeric rating scales (NRS) for arm pain and neck pain and data on complications were collected. To determine long-term follow-up outcomes, patients were sent a questionnaire booklet containing the Core Outcome Measures Index-Neck (COMI-Neck), NRS for arm pain and neck pain, Likert-scales on patient satisfaction and questions regarding the incidence of reoperations and complications.ResultsThe baseline characteristics were collected for 158 patients. At a median follow-up of 41.5 months (interquartile range (IQR) 27.0 to 57.5), data were available for 118 patients (74.7%). At short-term follow-up, patients that underwent PCN had a mean decrease of 3.0 on the NRS for arm pain (95% CI 2.5 to 3.6) compared to baseline, while at long-term follow-up, a mean decrease of 2.8 (95% CI 1.0 to 3.6) was observed. At the long-term follow-up, 67.8% of the patients were fully recovered from all symptoms and 93.3% remained satisfied with the PCN treatment results. The reoperation rate for recurrent disc herniation was 21.4% at long-term follow-up.ConclusionPCN appears to be a safe and effective treatment at short-term and long-term follow-up of a specific selection of cervical herniated discs, with an acceptable long-term reoperation rate. These study results suggest a potential role of PCN as a less invasive treatment option for cervical radicular pain due to a soft disc herniation, before anterior cervical discectomy should be considered.

The Effect of Percutaneous Nucleoplasty vs Anterior Discectomy in Patients with Cervical Radicular Pain due to a Single-Level Contained Soft-Disc Herniation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Cervical radicular pain (CRP) is a common problem in the adult population. When conservative treatment fails and the severe pain persist, surgical treatment is considered. However, surgery is associated with some serious risks. To reduce these risks, new minimally invasive techniques have been developed, such as percutaneous nucleoplasty. Several studies have shown that percutaneous nucleoplasty is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of CRP, but until now no randomized controlled trials have been conducted that compare percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty (PCN) to anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) in patients with a single-level contained soft-disc herniation. Objectives To compare the effects of PCN and ACD in a group of patients with CRP caused by a single-level contained soft-disc herniation. Study design A randomized, controlled, multi-center trial. Setting Medical University Center and local hospitals. Methods Forty-eight patients with CRP as a result of a single-level contained soft-disc herniation were randomized to one of the following 2 treatments: PCN or ACD. The primary outcome measure was arm pain intensity, measured with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes were arm pain intensity during heavy effort, neck pain, global perceived effect, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the patients' general health (Short Form Generated Health Survey [SF-36]). All parameters were measured at baseline (T0), 3 months after intervention (T2), and one year after intervention (T3). One week after the intervention (T1), an intermediate assessment of arm pain, arm pain during heavy effort, neck pain, satisfaction, and improvement were performed. Results At 3 months, the intention to treat analyses revealed a statistical significant interaction between the groups on the primary outcome, arm pain intensity, and on the secondary outcome of the SF-36 item pain, in favor of the ACD group. On the other secondary outcomes, no statistical significant differences were found between the groups over time. At 12 months, there was a trend for more improvement of arm pain in favor of the ACD group and no statistical interactions were found on the secondary outcomes. Limitations Firstly, the inclusion by the participating hospitals was limited. Secondly, the trial was ended before reaching the required sample size. Thirdly, at baseline, after the inclusion by the neurosurgeon, 13 patients scored less than 50.0 mm on the VAS. Fourthly, the withdrawal of the physiotherapy (PT) group and finally, the patients and interventionists could not be blinded for the treatment. Conclusions At 3 months, the ACD group performed significantly better on arm pain reduction than the PCN group in patients with CRP as a result of a single-level contained soft-disc hernia. However, the clinical relevancy of this treatment effect can be debated. For all parameters, after one year, no significant differences between the groups were found. When it comes to the longer-term effectiveness, we conclude that PCN can be a good alternative for ACD.

Cervical Spondylodiscitis with Neurologic Deterioration after Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty

Cervical Spondylodiscitis with Neurologic Deterioration after Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty for Cervical Degenerative Diseases with Neck Pain and Cervical Vertigo

Good short- and mid-term clinical efficacy of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty (PCN) for cervical degenerative diseases (CDD) with neck pain has been reported. However, few studies have assessed its long-term influence in patients with both neck pain and cervical vertigo. This study aimed to evaluate the curative efficacy of PCN for CDD with neck pain andcervical vertigo with minimum of 6 years of follow-up. Inpatients who underwent PCN for CDD with neck pain and cervical vertigo between April 2010 and March 2013 were enrolled. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Cervical Vertigo Evaluation Scale (CVES); greater CVES scores reflected less impairment. Additional open surgeries were recorded. Among 40 patients, 100% completed the 1-year short-term and 3-year mid-term follow-up (FU); 85%completed the 6-year long-term FU. Clinical effective rates were 67.5%, 67.5%, and 52.94% at short-, mid-, and long-term FU, respectively. CVES scores were greater than the preoperative CVES scores at all FU timepoints (P<0.01). However, the CVES score was lower at the final FU than at the 3-year FU (P < 0.05). The neck pain score significantly decreased over time and was lower than the cervical vertigo score at the final FU (P > 0.05). Reoperation rates were 1/40 (2.50%) and 3/34 (8.82%) at mid- and long-term FU, respectively. PCN in patients with CDD neck pain and cervical vertigo showed satisfactory clinical efficacy at short- and mid-term FU, and it was fair at long-term FU. Thus, PCN could be a complementary operation for CDD.

Retrospective Outcome Evaluation of Cervical Nucleoplasty Using Digital Infrared Thermographic Imaging.

ObjectivePercutaneous cervical nucleoplasty (PCN) is used to treat cervical disc herniation. Radiological imaging studies, including plain radiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have been used to make early predictions of cervical spinal surgery outcomes. However, simple radiological studies do not provide sufficiently detailed information; moreover, CT and MRI are highly expensive. Herein, we aimed to elucidate the usefulness of digital infrared thermography imaging (DITI) as an outcome marker after cervical nucleoplasty by correlating the changes in thermal difference (ΔTD) with the changes in pain intensity after PCN expressed as visual analogue scale (ΔVAS) scores. MethodsFor this study, 255 patients treated with PCN at Thomas Hospital between March 2012 and August 2014 were included. For each patient, demographic and clinical data, including preoperative MRI results, ΔVAS, ΔTD at the disc level treated with PCN, subjective symptom improvement, procedure-related discomfort, overall satisfaction, and adverse effects, were collected and evaluated for up to 3 months retrospectively. ResultsThermal difference (TD) and VAS scores improved after PCN (p<0.05), but ΔTD showed no significant correlation with ΔVAS. If the preoperative TD was larger, the postoperative VAS was worse and there was less pain relief (ΔVAS) after PCN (p<0.05). Only few adverse effects were noticeable after PCN. ConclusionIn DITI, which was used to evaluate the outcomes after cervical nucleoplasty, the ΔTD did not seem to reflect the ΔVAS after PCN. However, preoperative DITI findings could be useful for predicting VAS reduction and clinical improvements after PCN.

The Frequency of Re-Surgery After Cervical Disc Nucleoplasty

In percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty (PCN) a portion of the nucleus tissue is ablated using the Coblation technique. Re-surgery is an important factor for the clinical outcome. However, the rate of subsequent surgery after PCN is still unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of an additional open surgery after PCN in a retrospective of more than 10 years. Retrospective observational study. Consecutive patients with PCN between 2005 and 2007 were included. Patient's satisfaction was evaluated using McNab's outcome criteria. The necessity of an additional open surgery at the cervical spine, the period between PCN and the fusion, and the treated levels were analyzed. One hundred thirty-three patients were included. The follow-up time was longer than 5 years in 31.6% of patients and longer than 10 years in 6.0% of patients. The short-term success rate was 70.7%; however, subsequent surgery was performed in 19.5% of patients. Overall, 57.7 % of reoperations were performed during the first year after PCN. In patients with a good result after PCN, subsequent surgery was less frequent, and the interval between PCN and additional surgery was larger (P < 0.01). This is the first study reporting the frequency of re-surgery after PCN. Overall, 70.7% patient satisfaction was observed after 1 month. This result is worsened because of a re-surgery rate of 19.5%. The data from this study suggest that PCN is a poor replacement for conventional open surgery. Degeneration of the disc is progressive despite or because of PCN.

Predictive Factors of Successful Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty for the Treatment of Pain with Cervical Herniated Disk.

Percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty (PCN) is an effective treatment for cervical herniated intervertebral disc (C-HIVD). In this retrospective study, we evaluated clinical predictors that affect the successful outcome of PCN. Fluoroscopically guided PCN was conducted for C-HIVD by one pain physician. Successful outcome was defined as a combination of greater than 50% pain relief on the numerical rating scale pain score, no increase in analgesics, and no cervical epidural steroid injection during the 3-month follow-up period. The relationship between outcomes and independent variables, including patient demographics, comorbid diseases, pain duration, type of disc herniation, presence of spinal stenosis, pain location, analgesics, and shape of the PCN needle tip, were investigated using multivariable analyses. Of 201 patients, 134 experienced a successful outcome after PCN. In the positive outcome group, shorter pain durations, rarer central canal stenosis, increased unilateral radiculopathy versus axial pain, and more frequent use of the curved tip technique, were reported. Multivariable analyses revealed that unilateral radiculopathy (P= 0.013) and use of the curved-tip technique (P=0.027) were independent positive predictors of successful PCN outcomes; conversely, longer pain duration (P= 0.014) and concurrent spinal stenosis (P < 0.001) were negative predictors. No serious complications related to PCN occurred. In this study, the success rate of PCN was 66.7% in patients with C-HIVD. Shorter pain duration, the absence of cervical central canal stenosis, pain location (i.e., unilateral radiculopathy vs. axial pain), and the use of the curved-tip technique were positive predictors of successful PCN.

Percutaneous Nucleoplasty for the Treatment of a Contained Cervical Disk Herniation.

Cervical radiculopathy is characterized by compression of the roots of the nerve. When conservative treatment fails and symptoms persist or increase in severity, surgical treatment is considered. Anterior cervical discectomy with or without fusion is regarded as the standard treatment for cervical disk herniation. Recently, there is an evolving trend in spinal surgery towards less invasive techniques. Nucleoplasty is a minimally invasive technique in which radiofrequency technology is used for percutaneous decompression. During the last years nucleoplasty has been proven to be a safe and effective treatment to alleviate radiculopathy, caused by a contained disk herniation. Nucleoplasty is usually performed on an outpatient basis and is associated with a fast recovery time. This paper will describe the preoperative and postoperative management of cervical nucleoplasty as well as the surgical technique, accompanied by a video.

Morphometrical and Clinical Analysis of Cervical Nucleoplasty Cases Using Coblation Technique

Background: Nucleoplasty is a minimally invasive procedure for managing chronic discogenic cervical pain. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of nucleoplasty treatment on chronic cervical discogenic pain, intervertebral disc volumetry so as to examine the success of the surgery. Methods: Records of patients who underwent nucleoplasty from two different university hospitals in Turkey were assessed. Records between 2005 and 2014 years of thirty-six cases, who had no recovery from medical and physical treatment and treated with nucleoplasty at single or double levels investigated retrospectively. All assessments included visual analog scale (VAS) evaluation before the surgery and at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after the surgery. Intervertebral disc volumes between 4th and 5th cervical vertebrates and also between 5th and 6th were measured on axial magnetic resonance images slices using a stereological method, before and after the treatment. Results: VAS results displayed pain improvement at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after the surgery when compared with that of before the surgery (ps<0.05). After the nucleoplasty treatment, the mean intervertebral disc volumes between 4th and 5th, and also between 5th and 6th cervical vertebrates revealed significant decrease when compared with that of preoperative assesment (ps<0.05). The present study does not compare the results of different techniques used in the disc protrusion management. Conclusions: Good classified patients may have good prognosis with nucleoplasty. The method is minimally invasive, provides a safer surgical experience and has protective effects on intervertebral disc biomechanics.

The Efficacy of Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty for Cervical Herniated Disc Disease in Patients with Upper Extremities Radiating Pain

The Efficacy of Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty for Cervical Herniated Disc Disease in Patients with Upper Extremities Radiating Pain

Cervicogenic headache alleviation after cervical coblation nucleoplasty: A prospective cohort study.

A degenerative cervical disc is a pain generator for headaches, and headaches can benefit from cervical prolapse surgery. However, as an alternative intervention for open cervical surgery, no study has reported whether headaches can benefit from cervical nucleoplasty.The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of cervical coblation nucleoplasty in the treatment of cervicogenic headaches.In a prospective cohort study performed between December 2013 and August 2015, 20 patients with cervicogenic headaches undergoing cervical nucleoplasty for shoulder-arm pain were recruited into group C, and 20 patients with cervicogenic headaches undergoing lumbar nucleoplasty for low back pain, matched for age and sex, were recruited into group L. Cervicogenic pain was diagnosed according to the International Headache Society criteria. During the 24-month follow-up, pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores were collected as the primary outcomes, and significant pain relief rate, Neck Disability Index (NDI) headache scores, and Patients Satisfaction Index (PSI) scores were recorded as secondary outcomes to evaluate headache severity and physical function postoperatively.During the 24-month follow-up, a significant decrease in headache VAS scores was observed in group C but not in group L. NDI and PSI scores in group C were better than those in group L. In comparison with the final follow-up, no significant differences in the NDI and PSI scores were found in all observations after surgery. In comparison to group L, ≥50% pain relief was significantly better in group C. No serious complications were observed except for ≤20% of ecchymoma at the needle insertion site.This prospective study indicated that cervicogenic headaches may benefit from nucleoplasty.

Percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty using the L’DISQⓇ in patients with posterolateral disc extrusion −Three cases report−

Percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty using the L’DISQⓇ in patients with posterolateral disc extrusion −Three cases report−

Inferior thyroid arterial injury after percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty

Inferior thyroid arterial injury after percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty

Current Evidence of Percutaneous Nucleoplasty for the Cervical Herniated Disk: A Systematic Review

Although percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty (PCN) has been shown to be both safe and effective, its application is still debated. PCN applied in disk herniation has not been systematically reviewed before, resulting in a limited insight into its effectiveness and safety, and the quality of available evidence. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the evidence on the efficacy and safety of PCN in patients with a (contained) herniated disk. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies using the following keywords: "Nucleoplasty," "Cervical," "Hernia," "Herniation," "Prolapse," "Protrusion," "Intervertebral disk," and "Percutaneous disk decompression." First, all articles were appraised for methodological quality, and then, RCTs were graded for the level of evidence according a best-evidence synthesis, because a meta-analysis was not possible. Finally, the RCTs' applicability and clinical relevance also was assessed. Of 75 identified abstracts, 10 full-text articles were included (3 RCTs and 7 nonrandomized studies). These studies represented a total of 1021 patients: 823 patients (≥892 disks) were treated by PCN. All studies showed low methodological quality, except for two. The level of evidence of the RCTs was graded as moderate, with low to moderate applicability and clinical relevance. All included studies showed PCN to be an effective and safe procedure in the treatment of (contained) herniated disks at short-, mid-, and long-term follow-up. However, the level of evidence is moderate and shows only low to moderate applicability and clinical relevance.

Spondylodiscitis after Cervical Nucleoplasty without Any Abnormal Laboratory Findings

Infective spondylodiscitis is a rare complication that can occur after interventional spinal procedures, of which symptoms are usually back pain and fever. Early diagnosis of infective spondylodiscitis is critical to start antibiotics and to improve prognosis. Laboratory examinations including complet blood cell count (CBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) are conventional tools for the early detection of infectious spondylitis. However, we experienced infective spondylodiscitis after cervical nucleoplasty which did not display any laboratory abnormalities, but was diagnosed through an MRI. A patient with cervical disc herniation received nucleoplasty at C5/6 and C6/7. One month later, the patient complained of aggravated pain. There were neither signs of chill nor fever, and the laboratory results appeared normal. However, the MRI findings were compatible with infectious spondylodiscitis at the nucleoplasty site. In conclusion, infectious spondylodiscitis can develop after cervical nucleoplasty without any laboratory abnormalities. Therefore, an MRI should be taken when there is a clinical suspicion for infection in order to not miss complications after interventional procedures, even if the laboratory findings are normal.

Cervical nucleoplasty as an effective treatment method of cervical degenerative disc disease

Cervical nucleoplasty as an effective treatment method of cervical degenerative disc disease

Application of Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty Using the Navigable Disc Decompression Device in Patient of Cervical Herniated Intervertebral Disc: A Case Report

Recent years, various percutaneous procedures including cervical nucleoplasty have been developed for disc decompressions to relieve radicular pains caused by disc herniations. We report the application of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty (PCN) by using the navigable disc decompression device in two patients of cervical herniated intervertebral discs (HIVD). A 38-year-old female diagnosed with C4-C5 disc extrusion with bilateral C5 roots impingement received nucleoplasty twice at C4-C5 disc level. After second procedure, her pain was improved from 6-7/10 to 1-2/10 by visual analog scale (VAS). The second case, a 51-year-male was diagnosed with C6-C7 disc extrusion with right C7 roots impingement and received the procedure at C6-C7 disc level. The pain improved from 8/10 to 3-4/10 by VAS. Successfully, we decompressed cervical herniated discs in 2 HIVD patients without major complications. The PCN with the navigable device will be recommended as an alternative treatment method for cervical HIVD.

The Long‐term Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty in Patients with a Contained Herniated Disk

Percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty (PCN) is a safe and effective treatment in symptomatic patients with contained cervical herniated disks. It provides simple and efficient disk decompression, using a controlled and highly localized ablation, but evidence regarding long-term efficacy is limited. We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of PCN, and the influence of ideal selection settings. A total of 27 patients treated with PCN fulfilling ideal selection criteria (Group A) were studied and compared to 42 patients not meeting these criteria (Group B). Outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a four-level Likert item for perceived pain and satisfaction, the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the Short Form 36 (SF-36). Additional relevant outcomes were retrieved from medical records. The postoperative mean VAS pain for Group A was 29.9 (SD±32.6) at a mean follow-up of 24months (range: 2-45). Only 10% of these patients reported mild transient adverse events. There was a trend, but no difference between both groups in pain scores; however, treatment satisfaction was higher for Group A (74.1±27.2-55.5±31.4, P=0.02). Group A also reported better physical functioning based on the Physical Component Summary (43.6±10.6-37.3±12.0, P=0.03) and showed a larger proportion of patients no longer using any medication postoperatively (63-26%, P=0.01). These results show long-term effectiveness and safety of PCN in patients with a one-level contained cervical herniated disk, and the reliance of selecting patients meeting ideal criteria for successful PCN.

Percutaneous minimally invasive techniques in the treatment of cervical disc herniation

Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of percutaneous cervical discectomy (PCD group),percutaneous cervical disc nucleoplasty(PCN) and the association of them (PCDN) for the treatment of cervical intervertebral disk displacement and instability of cervical vertebral column.Methods From February 2003 to April 2011,171 consecutive patients with cervical disc herniation have presented at the authors' hospital and were retrospectively studied.The average age of patients was 47.8 years (ranged,21-74).Ninety-seven cases were treated with PCD,50 cases with PCN,and the other 24 cases with PCDN.Clinical result and the stability of cervical vertebral column after operation were evaluated and compared among the 3 groups.Results All cases had been followed up for a median of 4.1 years.There was significant difference in the pre- and post-operation the Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA) scoring system on within 3groups (PCD:t=21.85,P＜0.05; PCN:t=14.50,P＜0.05; PCDN:t=8.56,P＜0.05).All cases had been successfully operated.There was no significant difference between groups among the 3 groups in terms of the clinical outcomes(The recovery rate of JOA standard evaluation,F=2.19,P=0.12).According to Odom criteria,the excellent and good rate are as follows:81.35％ in PCD,82.44％ in PCN,83.19％ in PCDN,respectively.There was no significant difference between groups among the 3 groups in terms of the clinical success rate (P＞0.05).There was no instability of cervical vertebral column cases in 3 groups after operation (P＞0.05),and no significant difference was found in terms of cervical vertebral column stability in pre- and post-operation in each group.Conclusion All the three operations including PCN,PCD and PCDN are safe,minimally invasive spine surgery for the treatment of cervical intervertebral disk displacement; they achieve good clinical outcomes and there are no difference on the stability of cervical vertebral column between preoperation and postoperation. Key words: Cervical vertebrae; Intervertebral disk displacement; Diskectomy, percutaneous