TWENTY years ago, few states had alternative programs for certifying teachers, and those that did dusted them off only in case of emergency. Today, two kinds of alternative certification programs are proliferating: those delivered agencies not affiliated with an institution of higher education (sometimes called NUCPs for Non-University Certification Programs) and pared-down degrees delivered over the Internet universities and corporations specializing in for-profit educational endeavors. In California, approximately one in five new teachers enters the profession through NUCPs; in Texas and New Jersey, one in four new teachers comes from NUCPs. NUCPs usually receive their charge from legislation, such as California's S.B. 57, which gives school districts and other agencies the right to certify teachers. S.B. 57 states that people may become teachers by successfully completing tests and classroom observations in lieu of traditional teacher preparation coursework and student In lieu of coursework or student teaching, the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) requires next to nothing. That is, prospective teachers in the Los Angeles program can move from applicant status to full-time, salaried teacher without bothering to gain experience in an actual classroom, and the only courses required the LAUSD are delivered in-house in brief seminars or online during the first year of teaching. Many states are in the process of following California's lead dramatically loosening requirements for teacher certification. Recently, Florida Gov. Jeb Bush signed into law a mandate that every school district be given the authority to certify teachers. The paradox is that, while universities in Florida face increasingly difficult accountability standards from NCATE (National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education), from professional organizations (such as the National Council of Teachers of English and the National Science Teachers Association), and from regional and state accrediting agencies (such as the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools and the Florida Department of Education), no such accountability is required of Florida's NUCPs. As with the ranking system of public schools, the sole indicator of quality for teacher certification programs has become the percentage of teacher candidates able to pass multiple-choice exams. In a politically savvy move, the NUCPs have started using teacher exit tests, such as the Florida Teacher Certification Exam (similar to Praxis II in many states), as prerequisites for entry into their programs, thereby securing a perpetual passing rate of 100%. In the span of a few years, teacher certification has been transformed the surge in alternative certification and the proliferation of distance-education degree programs. To take the pulse of teacher certification, for the past year I gathered data on the more than 1,000 institutions and agencies that certify teachers in the U.S. Because the gritty details of certification--across the broad spectrum of grade levels and subject areas and across states and institutions--made analysis too unwieldy, I decided to focus on certification in secondary English (usually grades 7-12). Unlike mathematics, science, bilingual education, and special education, English is not a high-need certification area. Thus there is little reason to push for alternative certification in English. Using this logic, I surmised that trends in secondary English might be comparable to developments in social studies but would probably understate the prevalence of alternative programs and distance-education programs in science, mathematics, bilingual education, and special education. THE GROWTH OF ALTERNATIVE CERTIFICATION My study confirmed an incredible variability across institutions and NUCPs. Some programs have rigorous requirements governing admission, internship, and graduation; others require little more than a heartbeat and a check that clears the bank. …
Read full abstract