Central Mesencephalic Reticular Formation Research Articles

Brainstem sources of input to the central mesencephalic reticular formation in the macaque.

Physiological studies indicate that the central mesencephalic reticular formation (cMRF) plays a role in gaze changes, including control of disjunctive saccades. Neuroanatomical studies have demonstrated strong interconnections with the superior colliculus, along with projections to extraocular motor nuclei, the preganglionic nucleus of Edinger-Westphal, the paramedian pontine reticular formation, nucleus raphe interpositus, medullary reticular formation and cervical spinal cord, as might be expected for a structure that is intimately involved in gaze control. However, the sources of input to this midbrain structure have not been described in detail. In the present study, the brainstem cells of origin supplying the cMRF were labeled by retrograde transport of tracer (wheat germ agglutinin conjugated horseradish peroxidase) in macaque monkeys. Within the diencephalon, labeled neurons were noted in the ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus, pregeniculate nucleus and habenula. In the midbrain, labeled cells were found in the substantia nigra pars reticulata, medial pretectal nucleus, superior colliculus, tectal longitudinal column, periaqueductal gray, supraoculomotor area, and contralateral cMRF. In the pons they were located in the paralemniscal zone, parabrachial nucleus, locus coeruleus, nucleus prepositus hypoglossi and the paramedian pontine reticular formation. Finally, in the medulla they were observed in the medullary reticular formation. The fact that this list of input sources is very similar to those of the superior colliculus supports the view that the cMRF represents an important gaze control center.

Is the central mesencephalic reticular formation a purely horizontal gaze center?

Historically, the central mesencephalic reticular formation has been regarded as a purely horizontal gaze center based on the fact that electrical stimulation of this region produces horizontal saccades, it provides monosynaptic input to medial rectus motoneurons, and cells recorded in this region often display a peak in firing when horizontal saccades are made. We tested the proposition that the central mesencephalic reticular formation is purely a horizontal gaze center by examining whether this region also supplies terminals to superior rectus and levator palpebrae superioris motoneurons, both of which fire when making vertical eye movements. The experiments were carried out using dual tracer techniques at the light and electron microscopic level in macaque monkeys. Injections of biotinylated dextran amine or Phaseolus vulgaris leukoagglutinin into the central mesencephalic reticular formation produced anterogradely labeled terminals that were in synaptic contact with superior rectus and levator palpebrae superioris motoneurons that had been retrogradely labeled. These results indicate that this region is not purely connected with horizontal gaze motoneurons. In addition, we found that the number of contacts on vertical gaze motoneurons increased with more rostral injections involving the mesencephalic reticular formation adjacent to the interstitial nucleus of Cajal. This suggests that there is a caudal to rostral gradient for horizontal to vertical saccades, respectively, represented within the midbrain reticular formation. Finally, we utilized post-embedding immunohistochemistry to show that a portion of the labeled terminals were GABAergic, indicating they likely originate from downgaze premotor neurons.

A Novel Tectal/Pretectal Population of Premotor Lens Accommodation Neurons.

PurposeUnder real-world conditions, saccades are often accompanied by changes in vergence angle and lens accommodation that compensate for changes in the distance between the current fixation point and the next target. As the superior colliculus directs saccades, we examined whether it contains premotor neurons that might control lens compensation for target distance.MethodsRabies virus or recombinant rabies virus was injected into the ciliary bodies of Macaca fascicularis monkeys to label circuits controlling lens accommodation via retrograde transsynaptic transport. In addition, conventional anterograde tracers were used to confirm the rabies findings with respect to projections to preganglionic Edinger–Westphal motoneurons.ResultsAt time courses that rabies virus labeled lens-related premotor neurons in the supraoculomotor area and central mesencephalic reticular formation, labeled neurons were not found within the superior colliculus. They were, however, found bilaterally in the medial pretectal nucleus continuing caudally into the tectal longitudinal column, which lies on the midline, between the colliculi. A bilateral projection by this area to the preganglionic Edinger–Westphal nucleus was confirmed by anterograde tracing. Only at longer time courses were cells labeled in the superior colliculus.ConclusionsThe superior colliculus does not provide premotor input to preganglionic Edinger–Westphal nucleus motoneurons, but may provide input to lens-related premotor populations in the supraoculomotor area and central mesencephalic reticular formation. There is, however, a novel third population of lens-related premotor neurons in the tectal longitudinal column and rostrally adjacent medial pretectal nucleus. The specific function of this premotor population remains to be determined.

Cerebellar projections to the macaque midbrain tegmentum: Possible near response connections.

Since most gaze shifts are to targets that lie at a different distance from the viewer than the current target, gaze changes commonly require a change in the angle between the eyes. As part of this response, lens curvature must also be adjusted with respect to target distance by the ciliary muscle. It has been suggested that projections by the cerebellar fastigial and posterior interposed nuclei to the supraoculomotor area (SOA), which lies immediately dorsal to the oculomotor nucleus and contains near response neurons, support this behavior. However, the SOA also contains motoneurons that supply multiply innervated muscle fibers (MIFs) and the dendrites of levator palpebrae superioris motoneurons. To better determine the targets of the fastigial nucleus in the SOA, we placed an anterograde tracer into this cerebellar nucleus in Macaca fascicularis monkeys and a retrograde tracer into their contralateral medial rectus, superior rectus, and levator palpebrae muscles. We only observed close associations between anterogradely labeled boutons and the dendrites of medial rectus MIF and levator palpebrae motoneurons. However, relatively few of these associations were present, suggesting these are not the main cerebellar targets. In contrast, labeled boutons in SOA, and in the adjacent central mesencephalic reticular formation (cMRF), densely innervated a subpopulation of neurons. Based on their location, these cells may represent premotor near response neurons that supply medial rectus and preganglionic Edinger-Westphal motoneurons. We also identified lens accommodation-related cerebellar afferent neurons via retrograde trans-synaptic transport of the N2c rabies virus from the ciliary muscle. They were found bilaterally in the fastigial and posterior interposed nuclei, in a distribution which mirrored that of neurons retrogradely labeled from the SOA and cMRF. Our results suggest these cerebellar neurons coordinate elements of the near response during symmetric vergence and disjunctive saccades by targeting cMRF and SOA premotor neurons.

Neural control of rapid binocular eye movements: Saccade-vergence burst neurons

During normal viewing, we direct our eyes between objects in three-dimensional (3D) space many times a minute. To accurately fixate these objects, which are usually located in different directions and at different distances, we must generate eye movements with appropriate versional and vergence components. These combined saccade-vergence eye movements result in disjunctive saccades with a vergence component that is much faster than that generated during smooth, symmetric vergence eye movements. The neural control of disjunctive saccades is still poorly understood. Recent anatomical studies suggested that the central mesencephalic reticular formation (cMRF), located lateral to the oculomotor nucleus, contains premotor neurons potentially involved in the neural control of these eye movements. We have therefore investigated the role of the cMRF in the control of disjunctive saccades in trained rhesus monkeys. Here, we describe a unique population of cMRF neurons that, during disjunctive saccades, display a burst of spikes that are highly correlated with vergence velocity. Importantly, these neurons show no increase in activity for either conjugate saccades or symmetric vergence. These neurons are termed saccade-vergence burst neurons (SVBNs) to maintain consistency with modeling studies that proposed that such a class of neuron exists to generate the enhanced vergence velocities observed during disjunctive saccades. Our results demonstrate the existence and characteristics of SVBNs whose activity is correlated solely with the vergence component of disjunctive saccades and, based on modeling studies, are critically involved in the generation of the disjunctive saccades required to view objects in our 3D world.

Is Primate Lens Accommodation Unilaterally or Bilaterally Controlled?

PurposeIn frontal-eyed mammals such as primates, eye movements are coordinated so that the lines of sight are directed at targets in a manner that adjusts for target distance. The lens of each eye must also be adjusted with respect to target distance to maintain precise focus. Whether the systems for controlling eye movements are monocularly or binocularly organized is currently a point of contention. We recently determined that the premotor neurons controlling the lens of one eye are bilaterally distributed in the midbrain. In this study, we examine whether this is due to premotor neurons projecting bilaterally to the preganglionic Edinger-Westphal nuclei, or by a mixture of ipsilaterally and contralaterally projecting cells supplying each nucleus.MethodsThe ciliary muscles of Macaca fasicularis monkeys were injected with recombinant forms of the N2c rabies virus, one eye with virus that produced a green fluorescent marker and the other eye with a virus that produced a red fluorescent marker.ResultsPreganglionic motoneurons in the Edinger-Westphal nucleus displayed the same marker as the ipsilateral injected muscle. Many of the premotor neurons in the supraoculomotor area and central mesencephalic reticular formation were doubly labeled. Others were labeled from either the ipsilateral or contralateral eye.ConclusionsThese results suggest that both monocular control and binocular control of lens accommodation are present. Binocular inputs yoke the accommodation in the two eyes. Monocular inputs may allow modification related to differences in each eye's target distance or differences in the capacities of the two ciliary muscles.

Central mesencephalic reticular formation control of the near response: lens accommodation circuits.

To view a nearby target, the three components of the near response are brought into play: 1) the eyes are converged through contraction of the medial rectus muscles to direct both foveae at the target, 2) the ciliary muscle contracts to allow the lens to thicken, increasing its refractive power to focus the near target on the retina, and 3) the pupil constricts to increase depth of field. In this study, we utilized retrograde transsynaptic transport of the N2c strain of rabies virus injected into the ciliary body of one eye of macaque monkeys to identify premotor neurons that control lens accommodation. We previously used this approach to label a premotor population located in the supraoculomotor area. In the present report, we describe a set of neurons located bilaterally in the central mesencephalic reticular formation that are labeled in the same time frame as the supraoculomotor area population, indicating their premotor character. The labeled premotor neurons are mostly multipolar cells, with long, very sparsely branched dendrites. They form a band that stretches across the core of the midbrain reticular formation. This population appears to be continuous with the premotor near-response neurons located in the supraoculomotor area at the level of the caudal central subdivision of the oculomotor nucleus. The central mesencephalic reticular formation has previously been associated with horizontal saccadic eye movements, so these premotor cells might be involved in controlling lens accommodation during disjunctive saccades. Alternatively, they may represent a population that controls vergence velocity. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This report uses transsynaptic transport of rabies virus to provide new evidence that the central mesencephalic reticular formation (cMRF) contains premotor neurons controlling lens accommodation. When combined with other recent reports that the cMRF also contains premotor neurons supplying medial rectus motoneurons, these results indicate that this portion of the reticular formation plays an important role in directing the near response and disjunctive saccades when viewers look between targets located at different distances.

Reticular Formation Connections Underlying Horizontal Gaze: The Central Mesencephalic Reticular Formation (cMRF) as a Conduit for the Collicular Saccade Signal.

The central mesencephalic reticular formation (cMRF) occupies much of the core of the midbrain tegmentum. Physiological studies indicate that it is involved in controlling gaze changes, particularly horizontal saccades. Anatomically, it receives input from the ipsilateral superior colliculus (SC) and it has downstream projections to the brainstem, including the horizontal gaze center located in the paramedian pontine reticular formation (PPRF). Consequently, it has been hypothesized that the cMRF plays a role in the spatiotemporal transformation needed to convert spatially coded collicular saccade signals into the temporally coded signals utilized by the premotor neurons of the horizontal gaze center. In this study, we used neuroanatomical tracers to examine the patterns of connectivity of the cMRF in macaque monkeys in order to determine whether the circuit organization supports this hypothesis. Since stimulation of the cMRF produces contraversive horizontal saccades and stimulation of the horizontal gaze center produces ipsiversive saccades, this would require an excitatory cMRF projection to the contralateral PPRF. Injections of anterograde tracers into the cMRF did produce labeled terminals within the PPRF. However, the terminations were denser ipsilaterally. Since the PPRF located contralateral to the movement direction is generally considered to be silent during a horizontal saccade, we then tested the hypothesis that this ipsilateral reticuloreticular pathway might be inhibitory. The ultrastructure of ipsilateral terminals was heterogeneous, with some displaying more extensive postsynaptic densities than others. Postembedding immunohistochemistry for gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) indicated that only a portion (35%) of these cMRF terminals are GABAergic. Dual tracer experiments were undertaken to determine whether the SC provides input to cMRF reticuloreticular neurons projecting to the ipsilateral pons. Retrogradely labeled reticuloreticular neurons were predominantly distributed in the ipsilateral cMRF. Anterogradely labeled tectal terminals were observed in close association with a portion of these retrogradely labeled reticuloreticular neurons. Taken together, these results suggest that the SC does have connections with reticuloreticular neurons in the cMRF. However, the predominantly excitatory nature of the ipsilateral reticuloreticular projection argues against the hypothesis that this cMRF pathway is solely responsible for producing a spatiotemporal transformation of the collicular saccade signal.

A central mesencephalic reticular formation projection to medial rectus motoneurons supplying singly and multiply innervated extraocular muscle fibers.

We recently demonstrated a bilateral projection to the supraoculomotor area from the central mesencephalic reticular formation (cMRF), a region implicated in horizontal gaze changes. C-group motoneurons, which supply multiply innervated fibers in the medial rectus muscle, are located within the primate supraoculomotor area, but their inputs and function are poorly understood. Here, we tested whether C-group motoneurons in Macaca fascicularis monkeys receive a direct cMRF input by injecting this portion of the reticular formation with anterograde tracers in combination with injection of retrograde tracer into the medial rectus muscle. The results indicate that the cMRF provides a dense, bilateral projection to the region of the medial rectus C-group motoneurons. Numerous close associations between labeled terminals and each multiply innervated fiber motoneuron were present. Within the oculomotor nucleus, a much sparser ipsilateral projection onto some of the A- and B- group medial rectus motoneurons that supply singly innervated fibers was observed. Ultrastructural analysis demonstrated a direct synaptic linkage between anterogradely labeled reticular terminals and retrogradely labeled medial rectus motoneurons in all three groups. These findings reinforce the notion that the cMRF is a critical hub for oculomotility by proving that it contains premotor neurons supplying horizontal extraocular muscle motoneurons. The differences between the cMRF input patterns for C-group versus A- and B-group motoneurons suggest the C-group motoneurons serve a different oculomotor role than the others. The similar patterns of cMRF input to C-group motoneurons and preganglionic Edinger-Westphal motoneurons suggest that medial rectus C-group motoneurons may play a role in accommodation-related vergence.

Electromyography and Fos immunostaining study establish a possible functional link between trigeminal proprioception and the oculomotor system in rats.

The objective of this study was to explore whether there was a functional link between trigeminal proprioception and the oculomotor system mediated through jaw muscle afferents. Electromyography (EMG) was undertaken of the levator palpebrae (LP) and superior rectus (SR), and Fos expression was detected in the brainstem following consecutive down-stretching of the lower jaw at 2-4 Hz in rats. Retrograde tracing was undertaken of the interstitial nucleus of Cajal and Darkschewitsch nucleus (INC/DN) pre-oculomotor neurons. EMG-like responses were recorded from the LP/SR during down-stretching of the lower jaw at 2-4 Hz in 3 out of 11 rats. Fos expression was induced by consecutive down-stretching of the lower jaw at 2-4 Hz for 20-30 seconds. Interestingly, Fos expression was distributed mainly in the bilateral INC/DN area. We also examined Fos-like immunoreactivity in central mesencephalic and paramedian pontine reticular formation that harbors premotor neurons controlling horizontal eye movement, but no Fos-like staining was observed therein. By injection of retrograde tracers into the oculomotor nucleus combined with Fos immunostaining, double labeled pre-oculomotor neurons were visualized to distribute in the INC/DN. In conclusions, there may exist a trigeminal proprioceptive – oculomotor system neural circuit through jaw muscle afferents in rats. Judging from Fos distribution pattern, this pathway might be related to vertical and torsional eye movements.

A central mesencephalic reticular formation projection to the Edinger-Westphal nuclei.

The central mesencephalic reticular formation, a region associated with horizontal gaze control, has recently been shown to project to the supraoculomotor area in primates. The Edinger-Westphal nucleus is found within the supraoculomotor area. It has two functionally and anatomically distinct divisions: (1) the preganglionic division, which contains motoneurons that control both the actions of the ciliary muscle, which focuses the lens, and the sphincter pupillae muscle, which constricts the iris, and (2) the centrally projecting division, which contains peptidergic neurons that play a role in food and fluid intake, and in stress responses. In this study, we used neuroanatomical tracers in conjunction with immunohistochemistry in Macaca fascicularis monkeys to examine whether either of these Edinger-Westphal divisions receives synaptic input from the central mesencephalic reticular formation. Anterogradely labeled reticular axons were observed making numerous boutonal associations with the cholinergic, preganglionic motoneurons of the Edinger-Westphal nucleus. These associations were confirmed to be synaptic contacts through the use of confocal and electron microscopic analysis. The latter indicated that these terminals generally contained pleomorphic vesicles and displayed symmetric, synaptic densities. Examination of urocortin-1-positive cells in the same cases revealed fewer examples of unambiguous synaptic relationships, suggesting the centrally projecting Edinger-Westphal nucleus is not the primary target of the projection from the central mesencephalic reticular formation. We conclude from these data that the central mesencephalic reticular formation must play a here-to-for unexpected role in control of the near triad (vergence, lens accommodation and pupillary constriction), which is used to examine objects in near space.

A central mesencephalic reticular formation projection to the supraoculomotor area in macaque monkeys.

The central mesencephalic reticular formation is physiologically implicated in oculomotor function and anatomically interwoven with many parts of the oculomotor system's premotor circuitry. This study in Macaca fascicularis monkeys investigates the pattern of central mesencephalic reticular formation projections to the area in and around the extraocular motor nuclei, with special emphasis on the supraoculomotor area. It also examines the location of the cells responsible for this projection. Injections of biotinylated dextran amine were stereotaxically placed within the central mesencephalic reticular formation to anterogradely label axons and terminals. These revealed bilateral terminal fields in the supraoculomotor area. In addition, dense terminations were found in both the preganglionic Edinger-Westphal nuclei. The dense terminations just dorsal to the oculomotor nucleus overlap with the location of the C-group medial rectus motoneurons projecting to multiply innervated muscle fibers suggesting they may be targeted. Minor terminal fields were observed bilaterally within the borders of the oculomotor and abducens nuclei. Injections including the supraoculomotor area and oculomotor nucleus retrogradely labeled a tight band of neurons crossing the central third of the central mesencephalic reticular formation at all rostrocaudal levels, indicating a subregion of the nucleus provides this projection. Thus, these experiments reveal that a subregion of the central mesencephalic reticular formation may directly project to motoneurons in the oculomotor and abducens nuclei, as well as to preganglionic neurons controlling the tone of intraocular muscles. This pattern of projections suggests an as yet undetermined role in regulating the near triad.

Anatomical Evidence that the Superior Colliculus Controls Saccades through Central Mesencephalic Reticular Formation Gating of Omnipause Neuron Activity

Omnipause neurons (OPNs) within the nucleus raphe interpositus (RIP) help gate the transition between fixation and saccadic eye movements by monosynaptically suppressing activity in premotor burst neurons during fixation, and releasing them during saccades. Premotor neuron activity is initiated by excitatory input from the superior colliculus (SC), but how the tectum's saccade-related activity turns off OPNs is not known. Since the central mesencephalic reticular formation (cMRF) is a major SC target, we explored whether this nucleus has the appropriate connections to support tectal gating of OPN activity. In dual-tracer experiments undertaken in macaque monkeys (Macaca fascicularis), cMRF neurons labeled retrogradely from injections into RIP had numerous anterogradely labeled terminals closely associated with them following SC injections. This suggested the presence of an SC-cMRF-RIP pathway. Furthermore, anterograde tracers injected into the cMRF of other macaques labeled axonal terminals in RIP, confirming this cMRF projection. To determine whether the cMRF projections gate OPN activity, postembedding electron microscopic immunochemistry was performed on anterogradely labeled cMRF terminals with antibody to GABA or glycine. Of the terminals analyzed, 51.4% were GABA positive, 35.5% were GABA negative, and most contacted glycinergic cells. In summary, a trans-cMRF pathway connecting the SC to the RIP is present. This pathway contains inhibitory elements that could help gate omnipause activity and allow other tectal drives to induce the bursts of firing in premotor neurons that are necessary for saccades. The non-GABAergic cMRF terminals may derive from fixation units in the cMRF.

Vestibular responses in the macaque pedunculopontine nucleus and central mesencephalic reticular formation

The pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) and central mesencephalic reticular formation (cMRF) both send projections and receive input from areas with known vestibular responses. Noting their connections with the basal ganglia, the locomotor disturbances that occur following lesions of the PPN or cMRF, and the encouraging results of PPN deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease patients, both the PPN and cMRF have been linked to motor control. In order to determine the existence of and characterize vestibular responses in the PPN and cMRF, we recorded single neurons from both structures during vertical and horizontal rotation, translation, and visual pursuit stimuli. The majority of PPN cells (72.5%) were vestibular-only (VO) cells that responded exclusively to rotation and translation stimuli but not visual pursuit. Visual pursuit responses were much more prevalent in the cMRF (57.1%) though close to half of cMRF cells were VO cells (41.1%). Directional preferences also differed between the PPN, which was preferentially modulated during nose-down pitch, and cMRF, which was preferentially modulated during ipsilateral yaw rotation. Finally, amplitude responses were similar between the PPN and cMRF during rotation and pursuit stimuli, but PPN responses to translation were of higher amplitude than cMRF responses. Taken together with their connections to the vestibular circuit, these results implicate the PPN and cMRF in the processing of vestibular stimuli and suggest important roles for both in responding to motion perturbations like falls and turns.

Simple spatio-temporal transformation with sub-threshold integration in the saccadic system

Saccades are the fast eye movements dedicated to sight orientation toward targets. Robinson [1] suggested a model based on feedback control according to an internally estimated motor error relying on a integrator. Although supported by numerous behavioral studies, this principle is still in search of biological confirmation. Indeed, neurophysiological data has not yet uncovered all the details of the complex circuitry supporting saccade control. The displacement command is monitored by a brief pulse of activity emitted by saccadic burst neurons of the brain stem resulting in a stereotypic duration/velocity relationship (the main sequence). Burst neurons are under the control of the deep layers of the superior colliculus (SC) which encode saccade command as a focal burst of activity on a bidimensional retinotopic map. The transformation from bidimensional activity toward a precise burst is called the spatio-temporal transformation [2]. The many functional models that have been proposed [3] reproduce most of the robustness to perturbation observed, but lack in neuronal implementation details. Most of all, the integrator appears delicate to simulate with realistic neurons. Our proposition is that this integration component could simply rely on neuronal sub-threshold membrane integration with appropriate membrane time constant. The model we present is built with realistic spiking neurons (excitatory and inhibitory LIF neurons with reverse potentials - Damned simulator [4]). The general scheme is inspired from simple principles exposed in [5] suggesting that duration and velocity may be coded by two independent tracks from the colliculus (Dual path principle) [6]. The model comprise a complete SC topographic map and the path from the map to premotor burst neurons, including central mesencephalic reticular formation (cMRF) and omni-pause neurons (OPN). With appropriate projections, saccadic pre-motor activity is produced at the output of the system. Most of state-of-the-art properties are obtained :spatio-temporal transformation, component stretching, staircase saccades, etc. Our model also suggests distinct roles taken by ipsilateral and contralateral cMRF: contralateral cMRF could play the role of a gate silencing the OPN and allowing the burst neurons to start spiking, while ipsilateral cMRF would integrate the signal from SC and emit a brief burst of spikes at the end of saccade, as observed in [7].

The macaque midbrain reticular formation sends side-specific feedback to the superior colliculus.

The central mesencephalic reticular formation (cMRF) likely plays a role in gaze control, as cMRF neurons receive tectal input and provide a bilateral projection back to the superior colliculus (SC). We examined the important question of whether this feedback is excitatory or inhibitory. Biotinylated dextran amine (BDA) was injected into the cMRF of M. fascicularis monkeys to anterogradely label reticulotectal terminals and retrogradely label tectoreticular neurons. BDA labeled profiles in the ipsi- and contralateral intermediate gray layer (SGI) were examined electron microscopically. Postembedding GABA immunochemistry was used to identify putative inhibitory profiles. Nearly all (94.7%) of the ipsilateral BDA labeled terminals were GABA positive, but profiles postsynaptic to these labeled terminals were exclusively GABA negative. In addition, BDA labeled terminals were observed to contact BDA labeled dendrites, indicating the presence of a monosynaptic feedback loop connecting the cMRF and ipsilateral SC. In contrast, within the contralateral SGI, half of the BDA labeled terminals were GABA positive, while more than a third were GABA negative. All the postsynaptic profiles were GABA negative. These results indicate the cMRF provides inhibitory feedback to the ipsilateral side of the SC, but it has more complex effects on the contralateral side. The ipsilateral projection may help tune the "winner-take-all" mechanism that produces a unified saccade signal, while the contralateral projections may contribute to the coordination of activity between the two colliculi.

The Origin of Inputs to the Monkey Central Mesencephalic Reticular Formation (cMRF)

The central mesencephalic reticular formation (cMRF) is a midbrain region reciprocally connected to the superior colliculus (SC) where stimulation elicits horizontal saccades. Here we sought to identify its sources of input, by injecting retrograde tracers into the cMRF of M. fascicularis monkeys. In the diencephalon, labeled neurons were observed in the zona incerta, hypothalamus and the ventral lateral geniculate, ipsilaterally. The main source of midbrain input to the cMRF outside the SC was the ipsilateral substantia nigra pars reticulata, and contralateral cMRF. Within the pons, the paramedian reticular formation displayed a few cells, mostly ipsilaterally. Labeled neurons were found bilaterally in the nucleus prepositus hypoglossi and in the interposed and fastigial nuclei. A few neurons were present at medullary levels. It has been suggested that the cMRF might provide a conduit to the SC for ascending information on saccade duration and direction. While some feedback was observed for most of the cMRF's downstream targets, extensive connections to support this proposed function were not found. Instead, the cMRF seems to receive its greatest input from motor, as opposed to sensory, structures that also supply the SC. If the cMRF reticulotectal projection is inhibitory, then the GABAergic cells in the nigra and zona incerta are in position to release this inhibition via the cMRF.Support: NIH Grant EY014263

The feedback circuit connecting the central mesencephalic reticular formation and the superior colliculus in the macaque monkey: tectal connections

The connectional and physiological characteristics of the central mesencephalic reticular formation (cMRF) indicate that it participates in gaze control. The cMRF receives projections from the ipsilateral superior colliculus (SC) via collaterals of predorsal bundle axons. These collaterals target cMRF neurons, which in turn project back upon the SC. In the present study, we examined the pattern of connections made by the cMRF reticulotectal projection by injecting the bidirectional neuroanatomical tracer, biotinylated dextran amine (BDA), into the cMRF of macaque monkeys. Anterogradely labeled reticulotectal terminals were found bilaterally in the SC, with an ipsilateral predominance, and were concentrated in the intermediate gray layer (SGI). BDA also retrogradely labeled SC neurons projecting to the cMRF. These labeled tectoreticular cells were located mainly in SGI. Injection site specific differences in the SC labeling pattern were evident, suggesting the lateral cMRF is more heavily connected to the upper sublamina of SGI, whereas the medial cMRF is more heavily connected with the lower sublamina. In view of the known downstream connections of the cMRF and these SC sublaminae, this organization intimates that the cMRF may contain subdivisions specialized to modulate the eye and the head components of gaze changes. In addition, reticulotectal terminals were observed to have close associations with retrogradely labeled tectoreticular cells in the ipsilateral SC, indicating possible synaptic contacts. Thus, the cMRF's reciprocal connections with the SC suggest this structure plays a role in defining the gaze-related bursting behavior of collicular output neurons.

Anatomical evidence for interconnections between the central mesencephalic reticular formation and cervical spinal cord in the cat and macaque.

A gaze-related region in the caudal midbrain tegementum, termed the central mesencephalic reticular formation (cMRF), has been designated on electrophysiological grounds in monkeys. In macaques, the cMRF correlates with an area in which reticulotectal neurons overlap with tectoreticular terminals. We examined whether a region with the same anatomical characteristics exists in cats by injecting biotinylated dextran amine into their superior colliculi. These injections showed that a cat cMRF is present. Not only do labeled tectoreticular axons overlap the distribution of labeled reticulotectal neurons, these elements also show numerous close boutonal associations, suggestive of synaptic contact. Thus, the presence of a cMRF that supplies gaze-related feedback to the superior colliculus may be a common vertebrate feature. We then investigated whether cMRF connections indicate a role in the head movement component of gaze changes. Cervical spinal cord injections in both the cat and monkey retrogradely labeled neurons in the ipsilateral, medial cMRF. In addition, they provided evidence for a spinoreticular projection that terminates in this same portion of the cMRF, and in some cases contributes boutons that are closely associated with reticulospinal neurons. Injection of the physiologically defined, macaque cMRF demonstrated that this spinoreticular projection originates in the cervical ventral horn, indicating it may provide the cMRF with an efference copy signal. Thus, the cat and monkey cMRFs have a subregion that is reciprocally connected with the ipsilateral spinal cord. This pattern suggests the medial cMRF may play a role in modulating the activity of antagonist neck muscles during horizontal gaze changes.

Comparison of Saccade-Associated Neuronal Activity in the Primate Central Mesencephalic and Paramedian Pontine Reticular Formations

The oculomotor system must convert signals representing the target of an intended eye movement into appropriate input to drive the individual extraocular muscles. Neural models propose that this transformation may involve either a decomposition of the intended eye displacement signal into horizontal and vertical components or an implicit process whereby component signals do not predominate until the level of the motor neurons. Thus decomposition models predict that premotor neurons should primarily encode component signals while implicit models predict encoding of off-cardinal optimal directions by premotor neurons. The central mesencephalic reticular formation (cMRF) and paramedian pontine reticular formation (PPRF) are two brain stem regions that likely participate in the development of motor activity since both structures are anatomically connected to nuclei that encode movement goal (superior colliculus) and generate horizontal eye movements (abducens nucleus). We compared cMRF and PPRF neurons and found they had similar relationships to saccade dynamics, latencies, and movement fields. Typically, the direction preference of these premotor neurons was horizontal, suggesting they were related to saccade components. To confirm this supposition, we studied the neurons during a series of oblique saccades that caused "component stretching" and thus allowed the vectorial (overall) saccade velocity to be dissociated from horizontal component velocity. The majority of cMRF and PPRF neurons encoded component velocity across all saccades, supporting decomposition models that suggest horizontal and vertical signals are generated before the level of the motoneurons. However, we also found novel vectorial eye velocity encoding neurons that may have important implications for saccade control.