Central Hole Implantation Research Articles

The effect of irrigation and aspiration on the corneal endothelial cell density in patients undergoing Implantable Collamer Lens with a central hole implantation for myopia correction.

In the conventional technique, viscoelastic agents are typically rinsed away with balanced salt solution (BSS), but it may lead to a series of complications such as viscoelastic residue, anterior chamber instability and intraoperative TICL rotation. The utilization of irrigation and aspiration (I/A) has been shown to be effective in maintaining anterior chamber stability, reducing the incidence of postoperative high intraocular pressure, and minimizing postoperative fundus complications. However, there is a lack of previous studies investigating the impact of I/A on corneal endothelial cells during ICL implantation. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of I/A on corneal endothelial cells in patients undergoing myopia correction through implantation of Implantable Collamer Lens with a central hole (V4c ICL). A retrospective selection was made of 344 eyes from 172 patients who underwent V4c ICL implantation and I/A to remove viscoelastic agent from the anterior chamber between 2021 and 2022. The intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured at 1h, 2h and 3h after surgery. Corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficient of variation in cell size (CV), standard deviation of cell area (SD), and percentage of hexagonal cells (HEX) were evaluated at 1week postoperatively to assess corneal endothelial cells. The first two represent polymegethism or morphological variation, while the third parameter represents the degree of polymorphism of the corneal endothelial cells. Electronic medical records were utilized for data collection purpose. All surgeries proceeded without complications. The IOP was 16.50 ± 3.42mmHg (range: 11.5-22.3mmHg) prior to surgery and increased to 21.25 ± 5.61mmHg (range: 9.5-34.8mmHg), 19.85 ± 5.18mmHg (range: 11.4-36.2mmHg) and finally settled at an average of 18.81 ± 4.57mmHg (range: 10.1-38.8mmHg) at the respective time points of 1h, 2h and 3h after surgery. The preoperative ECD was recorded as being approximately 3004 ± 295 cell/mm2, which exhibited a marginal decreased of 1.17% postoperatively, resulting in an average ECD value of 2969 ± 303 cell/mm2 one week after surgery (P = 0.12). Similarly, the preoperative CV was determined as 31.10 ± 3.78%, and it experienced a slight reduction with an average CV value of 30.74 ± 3.77% at week after surgery (P = 0.21). And, the preoperative SD was reported as 104.76 ± 17.26, and it remained virtually unchanged with an average SD value of 104.85 ± 18.75 at one week after surgery (P = 0.95). The preoperative HEX was calculated as 55.38 ± 8.94%, and it remained its stability with an average HEX value of 55.45 ± 8.73% one week after surgery (P = 0.92). The utilization of I/A led to a slight decrease in postoperative ECD when compared to conventional surgical techniques. Nevertheless, the reduction in ECD remained within acceptable limits, taking into accout the avervantaged it offered, such as stabilization of the anterior chamber and decreased occurrence of viscoelastic residue after surgery. It is challenging to anticipate the long-term safety of corneal endothelial cells based on current short-term studies. However, this study provides a valuable reference indicating that neither anterior chamber irrigation nor I/A aspiration have an adverse impact on the safety of corneal endothelial cells in the short term. Further research is imperative to enhance our understanding of their effects over an extended period.

Comparison of implantation of posterior chamber phakic IOL implantation and laser vision correction in terms of corneal endothelial cells: 3-year observational paired-eye study.

To compare the postoperative endothelial cell counts of EVO-implantable collamer lenses (ICLs) with a central hole (V4c and V5) and laser vision correction surgery (laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy). B&VIIT Eye Center, Seoul, South Korea. Retrospective observational and paired contralateral study. 62 eyes of 31 patients who underwent EVO-ICLs with a central hole implantation in one eye (phakic intraocular lens [pIOL] group) and laser vision correction in the contralateral eye (LVC group) to correct refractive errors were retrospectively reviewed. Central endothelial cell density (ECD), percentage of hexagonal cells (HEX), coefficient of variation (CoV) in cell size, and adverse events were evaluated for at least 3 years. The endothelial cells were observed using a noncontact specular microscope. All surgeries were performed, without complications during the follow-up period. The mean ECD loss values compared with the preoperative measurements were 6.65% and 4.95% during the 3 years after pIOL and LVC, respectively. There was no significant difference in ECD loss compared with the preoperative values (paired t test, P = .188) between the 2 groups. No significant loss in ECD was observed at any timepoint. The pIOL group showed higher HEX ( P = .018) and lower CoV ( P = .006) values than the LVC group at the last visit. According to the authors' experience, the EVO-ICL with a central hole implantation was a safe and stable vision correction method. Moreover, it did not induce statistically significant changes in ECD at 3 years postoperatively compared with LVC. However, further long-term follow-up studies are required to confirm these results.

Intraocular Implantable Collamer Lens with a Central Hole Implantation: Safety, Efficacy, and Patient Outcomes.

This review summarizes the available literature and provides updates on the efficacy, safety, and patient outcomes of phakic intraocular lens implantation using implantable collamer lens (ICL), with a focus on newer models with a central port (EVO/EVO+ Visian Implantable Collamer Lens, STAAR Surgical Inc.). All studies included in this review were identified from the PubMed database and were reviewed for relevancy of their topic. Data on hole-ICL implantation performed between October 2018 and October 2022 in 3399 eyes showed a weighted average efficacy index of 1.03 and a weighted average safety index of 1.19 within an average follow-up of 24.7 months. The incidence of complications such as elevated intraocular pressure, cataract, and corneal endothelial cell loss was low. Moreover, both quality of vision and quality of life improved after ICL implantation, confirming the benefits of this procedure. In conclusion, ICL implantation is a promising refractive surgery alternative to laser vision correction with excellent efficacy, safety, and patient outcomes.

A direct observation of aqueous humour flow in vivo after implantable collamer lens with a central hole implantation.

A direct observation of aqueous humour flow in vivo after implantable collamer lens with a central hole implantation.

Comparison of anterior chamber angle changes following phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole implantation for moderate to high myopic eyes.

The aim of this study was to compare the anterior chamber angle changes after implantation of phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole for moderate to high myopic eyes in Chinese people.This study enrolled 106 eyes of 54 people with intraocular lens V4 implantation and 105 eyes of 53 people with intraocular lens V4c implantation. Postoperative vault, intraocular pressure, and anterior chamber angle changes were assessed using noncontract tonometer and ultrasound biomicroscope, respectively, at 1, 3, 6, and 12months after the surgery.There were no significant differences (all P > .05) between the 2 groups in the depth of the central vault, intraocular pressure, or the width of anterior chamber angle at any time point post-surgery. The anterior chamber angle width in degree had a baseline of 54.40 ± 10.51 in V4c group, and decreased to 27.80 ± 5.62, 26.95 ± 5.56, 27.32 ± 5.66, 27.04 ± 5.47 at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery, respectively. Mean preoperative value of 50.62 ± 11.77 decreased to 27.28 ± 6.53, 26.82 ± 6.03, 26.61 ± 5.80, 26.83 ± 5.76 at 1, 3, 6, 12 months, respectively, in V4 group. It had sufficient evidence (P < .001) that anterior chamber angle will narrow done after surgery, but there were no statistically significant differences within groups at any time point after surgery.The anterior chamber angle changes of the V4c group was essentially equivalent to that of conventional V4 group, although implantation of both models will lead to the decrease in anterior chamber angle width.

Intraindividual Comparison of Visual Performance After Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens With and Without a Central Hole Implantation for Moderate to High Myopia

To compare postoperative visual performance after implantable Collamer lenses with and without a central hole (Hole ICL and conventional ICL) are implanted to correct moderate to high myopia. Prospective intraindividual comparative study. This study evaluated 58 eyes of 29 patients with spherical equivalents of -7.55 ± 2.09 diopters (D) [mean ± standard deviation] who underwent Hole ICL implantation in one eye and conventional ICL implantation in the other eye by randomization assignment. Ocular higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and contrast sensitivity (CS) function were measured by Hartmann-Shack aberrometry and a contrast sensitivity unit before and 3 months after surgery, respectively. From the contrast sensitivity, the area under the log CS function was calculated. For 4-mm and 6-mm pupils, the changes after Hole ICL implantation in coma-like aberrations, spherical-like aberrations, and total HOAs are similar to those after conventional ICL implantation (P > .05, Wilcoxon signed rank test). The postoperative area under the log CS function was significantly increased after Hole ICL implantation (P < .05), and was equivalent to that after conventional ICL implantation under photopic, mesopic, or mesopic with glare conditions. Subjective symptoms such as glare or halo were also essentially equivalent after Hole ICL and conventional ICL implantation. A newly developed Hole ICL implantation appears to be equivalent in the induction of HOAs and CS function to conventional ICL implantation for the correction of moderate to high myopia, suggesting its viability as a surgical option for the treatment of such eyes, because it does not require additional peripheral iridotomies and may also reduce the risk of cataract formation.