Central Catheters In Neonates Research Articles

The effects of maternal voice on pain during placement of peripherally inserted central catheter in neonates.

Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) are a necessary procedure for preterm newborns care. Despite the use of analgesic treatments, its insertion can be painful. Our objective was to study the effect of maternal voice on pain during PICC insertion. We conducted a pre post study for 2 years. Pain was compared between the two groups (with/without maternal presence) using a neonatal pain scale (FANS). Infection rate, procedure time, number of failures, mothers' anxiety and caregivers'anxiety were compared between the two groups. Ninety neonates were eligible. Finally, 63 neonates were included. Thirty-four placements were realized without maternal voice (first period) and 29 with maternal voice (second period). Mean FANS during PICC placement was lower in the maternal voice group than in the control group (1.15 ± 1.27 vs. 1.41 ± 1.49, p = 0.033). The FANS was also lower in the maternal voice group during the time of the first cutaneous effraction (p = 0.032). There was no significant difference between the two groups concerning the other outcomes. Maternal voice added to conventional care decreased acute pain during PICC insertion without increasing infection rate, number of failures or procedure time.

Standardized Ultrasound Protocol for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Neonates: A Retrospective, X-ray Controlled Observational Study.

Objectives: Ultrasound (US) has been reported to be a reliable imaging modality for locating the tip of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) in neonates. However, its use requires a certain level of expertise, which may limit its application. Standardization of US examinations using designed protocols may improve their efficiency and ease of use. The objective of our study is to evaluate the effectiveness of introducing a standardized US protocol for PICC guidance. Methods: An expert panel was formed in order to develop a standardized US protocol for PICC assessment. Institutional review board agreement was obtained. This protocol was then used by participating clinicians to assess PICC position. Every assessment was followed by a radiographic control. The study group consisted of 262 US examinations of PICC lines in a level III neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) performed according to the designed protocol. Subsequent statistical analysis was made with the RStudio software, R version 4.3.1 (2023-06-16 ucrt). Results: Compared to the X-ray control, standardized US examinations showed 100% sensitivity, 81% specificity, an accuracy of 98% and a 98% precision for assessing catheter placement. The Cohen's Kappa value for the comparison of X-ray and US studies was 0.88, indicating good agreement between the two methods. Conclusions: Standardized US examinations have shown similar potential for evaluating the location of PICC lines when compared with radiographic studies. Implementing a standardized protocol in the NICU may facilitate the ultrasound assessment of PICC lines and reduce exposure to ionizing radiation.

Nursing perceptions and practices in relation to adverse events related to peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates: A mixed methods study

ObjectivesThis study aims to characterize adverse events (AEs) related to the insertion and maintenance of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in the neonatal intensive care unit, as well as to analyze the nursing team's perception of these events. MethodsAn exploratory mixed methods research that analyzed 161 medical records of newborns admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of a public hospital in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, from January to December 2019, and conducted interviews with 17 nursing professionals from the unit. ResultsThere was an incidence of 33.5% of AEs related to PICCs in the analyzed medical records, with obstruction (33.3%), infiltration (18.5%), and catheter rupture (14.8%) being the most common. ConclusionAlthough the nursing team demonstrates theoretical knowledge about AEs, the high incidence suggests a possible gap between theory and practice, indicating the need for further investigation. The importance of continuous training and protocol updates to prevent these events is emphasized.

Placement of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates: A retrospective study.

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are commonly used in neonatal intensive care units for extended intravenous nutrition and therapy. The selection of PICCs insertion sites can significantly influence insertion outcomes and neonatal safety. This study aimed to determine the most suitable insertion site in the lower extremities for neonatal PICCs. A retrospective case note review was conducted on PICCs inserted through lower extremity (LE) sites in a 40-bed tertiary-level neonatal intensive care unit at a university teaching hospital. The dates when data were accessed for research purposes were from June 2019 to June 2022. In total, 223 neonates were identified as having had PICCs, with 254 catheters inserted in the lower extremities. The STROBE checklist guided the reporting of this study. Neonates underwent PICC insertion via the LE vein, with an overall complication rate of 13.4% and a one-attempt success rate of puncture of 86.2%. The rates of complications, catheter occlusion, and catheter-related infection in the PICC group with insertion through the great saphenous vein were significantly lower than those in the femoral vein group (p < .05). The success rate was significantly higher than that in the femoral vein group (p < .05). Additionally, the incidence of total complications and catheter occlusion complications with PICC insertion via the right LE was significantly lower than that with insertion via the left LE (p < .05). Our study suggested that, when feasible, the saphenous vein in the right LE could be the most suitable insertion site for neonatal PICCs. These findings provide insights into the complications, indwelling time, and safety of neonatal PICCs in different LE sites, serving as a valuable reference for clinical practice. This study was retrospective in nature, and all staff involved obtained approved access to patient clinical data. Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University (registry number 2022010001).

Complications and Related Risk Factors of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Neonates: A Historical Cohort Study.

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are an effective method for medication and nutrition infusion in preterm neonates. The present study aimed to identify the incidence of the most common complications of PICC implantation and evaluate the risk factors of each complication. This historical cohort study was conducted on 2500 neonates with birth weights (BWs)≥500 g and gestational age (GA)>24 weeks who had a history of PICC inserted in three NICUs between August 2015 and August 2018. Data were collected by reviewing medical records. Demographic data and indices of catheter placement, duration of catheter placement, and common complications were recorded. Data analysis was done using SPSS-21. The median cubital vein had the most PICC placement (43%). The most common complication was tip malposition (48.2%). The incidence rates (95% CI) of the main complications such as malposition, edema/occlusion, and PICC migration were 0.0356 (0.0337-0.0377), 0.0134 (0.0122-0.0147), and 0.0088 (0.0079-0.0099), respectively. PICC insertion position was the strongest predictor of malposition for the cephalic vein. Besides, the incidence of malformation in the cephalic vein was about six times higher than in the median cubital vein. Independent risk factors for non-technical complications included BW (OR=0.59, 95% CI 0.44-0.79), administration of hyperosmolar medications (OR=3.43, 95% CI 2.62-4.51), position (OR=2.43, 95% CI 1.92- 3.08), and duration of catheter presence (OR=1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03) (P<0.001). The most common complication was malposition related to catheter placement in an emergency. Moreover, BW, administration of hyperosmolar medications, and duration of catheter presence were the most critical risk factors for non-technical complications. Therefore, it is recommended to educate the PICC insertion team to reduce tip malposition and replace long-term catheters.

Tamponade and massive pleural effusions secondary to peripherally inserted central catheter in neonates-A complication to be aware of.

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are frequently used in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) to assist premature and critically ill neonates. Massive pleural effusions, pericardial effusions, and cardiac tamponade secondary to PICC are extremely uncommon but have potentially fatal consequences. This study investigates the incidence of tamponade, large pleural, and pericardial effusions secondary to peripherally inserted central catheters in a neonatal intensive care unit at a tertiary care center over a 10-year period. It explores possible etiologies behind such complications and suggests preventative measures. Retrospective analysis of neonates who were admitted to the NICU at the AUBMC between January 2010 and January 2020, and who required insertion of PICC. Neonates who developed tamponade, large pleural, or pericardial effusions secondary to PICC insertion were investigated. Four neonates developed significant life-threatening effusions. Urgent pericardiocentesis and chest tube placement were required in two and one patients, respectively. No fatalities were encountered. The abrupt onset of hemodynamic instability without an obvious cause in any neonate with PICC in situ should raise suspicion of pleural or pericardial effusions. Timely diagnosis through bedside ultrasound, and prompt aggressive intervention are critical.

The incidence and mortality rate of catheter-related neonatal pericardial effusion: A meta-analysis.

Neonatal pericardial effusion (PCE) is one of the most severe complications of central catheters in neonates with its rapid progression and high mortality. We aim to estimate the overall incidence and mortality of catheter-related neonatal PCE, more importantly, to identify possible predictors for clinical reference. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, china national knowledge infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and Sinomed databases for subject words "central catheter," "neonate," "pericardial effusion" and their random words till June 8, 2020. This meta-analysis is based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Possible predictors of occurrences and deaths were extracted and assessed cooperatively. The pooled incidence rate of catheter-related neonatal PCE was calculated using a random effects model. Twenty-one cohort studies and 99 cases were eligible. Pooled incidence is 3·8‰[2.2‰, 6.7‰]. Polyurethane catheters generate significantly more neonatal PCE than silicone counterparts (P < .01). 27% of the patients die. The mortality of patients with bradycardia is higher than others (P < .05). Catheters with a guidewire result in more deaths than umbilical venous catheter (UVC) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) (P < .05). Without pericardiocentesis, mortality increases (P < .01). The difference of deaths between reposition and removing the catheter is insignificant (P > .05). Central catheters in Seldinger Technique (with a guidewire) put neonates at greater risk of PCE and consequent death. Silicone catheters excel at avoiding deadly catheter-related PCE, which could be a better choice in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). When catheter-related PCE occurs, timely diagnosis and pericardiocentesis save lives.

Assessment of the Complications of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter in Neonates Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: A Center's Experience in Iran.

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC), which is inserted through peripheral veins into the superior or inferior vena cava, is used to inject medications or parenteral nutrition in neonates with long-term hospitalization in the intensive care unit. In this study, we assessed the complications of PICC in neonates admitted to the intensive care unit in hospital. In the present retrospective cohort, neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of Valiasr Hospital during 2015-2018 had been divided into two groups with PICC and without it. Data included the occurrence of septicemia, tachycardia, perforation of large veins, pulmonary hypertension, cardiac tamponade, pericardial effusion, catheter site necrosis, hemorrhage, anemia, pleural effusion, ascites, phlebitis of catheter track and neonatal death, which were collected, using the comprehensive neonatal registry of Valiasr Hospital. Data analysis was performed with regression, mantel-haenszel and independent t-test. Data from 174 neonates with PICC were compared to 207 infants with classic IV-Line. In the exposure group, the gestational age and birth weight were lower. Based on the results of the double logistic regression test, septicemia and hemorrhage in the injection site, independent of other variables, were related to the use of PICC and the risk of septicemia or hemorrhage in the injection site was significantly reduced if PCIC was used (p < 0.01). Using the PICC as a therapeutic procedure in hospitalized neonates in the NICU is a safe method. By improving its replacement skills among physicians and nurses, its side effects are minor and negligible.

The intracavitary ECG method for tip location of ultrasound-guided centrally inserted central catheter in neonates

The correct position of the tip of a central venous access device is important in all patients, and especially in neonates. The traditional method of tip location (approximated intra-procedural length estimation + post procedural chest X-ray) is currently considered inaccurate and not cost-effective by most recent guidelines, which recommend the adoption of tip location by intracavitary electrocardiography (IC-ECG) whenever possible. This study prospectively investigated the applicability, the feasibility, the accuracy, and the safety IC-ECG for tip location in neonates requiring insertion of ultrasound-guided centrally inserted central venous catheters (CICCs) with caliber 3Fr or more. All catheter tip locations were verified using simultaneously both IC-ECG and ultrasound-based tip location, using the Neo-ECHOTIP protocol. A total of 105 neonates were enrolled. The applicability of IC-ECG was 100% since a P wave was evident on the surface ECG of all neonates recruited for the study. The feasibility was also 100% since an increase of the P-wave was detected in all cases. The accuracy was also 100%, since a perfect match between IC-ECG based tip location and ultrasound-based tip location was found. There were no adverse events directly or indirectly related to the IC-ECG technique; no arrhythmias occurred. When applied to ultrasound guided CICCs, tip location by IC-ECG is applicable and feasible in neonates, and it is safe and accurate.

Ultrasound and Radiography Evaluation of the Tips of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Neonates Admitted to the NICU

Background: Appropriate and accurate easy access tools are necessary to overcome complications from malpositioned line tips of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in critically ill neonates. Ultrasound is a radiationless, cost-beneficial, and time-saving method that allows medical personnel to manipulate the line and correct possible malposition of this tip. In addition, it reduces the need for a second radiography. Objectives: We compared the effectiveness of sonography with radiography for confirmation of the line tip placement. Methods: This prospective descriptive-analytical study was conducted in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) in Tehran Children’s Medical Center (tertiary level), Tehran, Iran. Neonates who were candidates for PICC implantation according to the ward’s protocol were enrolled in the study. Radiography and sonography were performed after catheter insertion by a radiologist blinded to the preliminary radiographic reports. The results of both methods were compared and interpreted by statistical analysis using the chi-square and Pearson correlation tests. Results: A total of 90 infants, 45 (50%) males and 45 (50%) females, were assessed. We noted that 17 (18.8%) cases had malpositioned tips according to the radiographs. Malpositioning of the line tips were identified in 21.1% of cases by sonography (P ≤ 0.05), which indicated a higher accuracy for sonography compared to radiography. Both methods were appropriately correlated regardless of the underlying variables. Sonography had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 89.5%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 97.3%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. Conclusions: Our findings show that sonography can be a more accurate, safer bedside tool, with fewer complications compared to radiography in PICC tip placement determination in neonates. Multi-center studies with increased sample sizes should be performed to confirm replacement of radiography by sonography as the gold standard test for confirmation of PICC tip positioning.

Use of Point of Care Ultrasound for Confirming Central Line Tip Position in Neonates

To assess feasibility of ultrasound (USG) evaluation of tip position of central catheter in neonates and to determine agreement between radiograph and USG-based assessments. This prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit from April, 2019 to August, 2019. Point of care USG and radiograph were performed on infants who underwent central line placement. Agreement between the two was determined using Kappa statistics. Of the 141 central catheters insertions performed, USG was performed for 65 central catheters. On USG, catheter tip position could be assessed and defined in 62 (95%) of cases. Of these 62 central lines, 24 (38.7%) were defined as optimally placed on radiograph and 20 (32.2%) were defined as optimally placed on USG. There was excellent agreement between radiographic and USG assessment of catheter tip position [K (95% CI) = 0.86 (0.73-0.99), P <0.001]. All 38 lines found to be mal-positioned on radiograph were assessed as sub-optimal on USG as well. Point of care USG has excellent agreement with radiography for confirming central line tip position.

Ultrasound Guided Confirmation of Tip of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter in Neonates

Ultrasound Guided Confirmation of Tip of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter in Neonates

Supraclavicular Approach to Ultrasound-Guided Brachiocephalic Vein Cannulation in Children and Neonates.

The correct choice of intra vascular access in critically ill neonates should be individualized depending on the type and duration of therapy, gestational and chronological age, weight and/or size, diagnosis, clinical status, and venous system patency. Accordingly, there is an ongoing demand for optimization of catheterization. Recently, the use of ultrasound (US)-guided cannulation of the subclavian vein (SCV) has been described in children and neonates. This article gives an overview of the current use of US for achieving central venous catheter placement in the SCV or the brachiocephalic vein (BCV) in neonates. More than 1,250 catheters have been reported inserted in children and neonates for a cumulated success rate of 98.4% and the complication rate is reported to be low. The technical aspects of various approaches are discussed, and we offer our recommendation of an US-guided technique for SCV and BCV cannulation based on our experience in a large NICU setting. Although the cannulation the SCV or BCV does not substitute the use of peripherally inserted central catheters or umbilical venous central catheters in neonates, it is a feasible route in very small children who are in need of a large caliber central venous access.

Correlation study of the unplanned extubation caused by peripherally inserted central catheter in neonates with different tip postions

Objective To investigate the incidence of the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) complications in neonates. Methods A retrospective analysis of PICC in 201 cases in our neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from January 2015 to October 2016, who were divided into the central group and non-central group according to the position of the catheter tip. Compare unplanned extubation rate, catheter-related bloodstream infection rate, catheter indwelling time of PICC catheter and removing reasons between these two groups. Results One hundred and sixty-five cases in central group and thirty-six cases in non-central group. The unplanned extubation rate of the central group was 18.2% (30/165) while 22.2% (8/36) of non-central group, the difference wasnot statistically significant (χ2=0.315, P=0.639). The difference of the catheter-related bloodstream infection rate (P=0.471), the catheter indwelling time and removing reasons between these two groups were not statistically significant(P>0.05). Conclusions Even if the position of PICC tip is not in superior or inferior vena, it still can be used in neonatal population, but should pay attention to safe medical care. Key words: Infant, newborn; Catheterization, peripheral; Tip

Abstract No. 8 - Infection rate of tunneled femoral noncuffed central venous catheters versus peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates and infants: a single-institutional experience

Abstract No. 8 - Infection rate of tunneled femoral noncuffed central venous catheters versus peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates and infants: a single-institutional experience

Umbilical Venous Catheter Versus Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter in Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

UVC is a cheaper alternative to PICC, with similar success rate, short-term complications and time needed for insertion.

Insertion of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates less than 1.5kg using ultrasound guidance.

Neonates commonly require central access, and in those with very low or extremely low birthweight this can be challenging. Described here is a technique that uses ultrasound guidance in the placement of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) in neonates and an analysis of outcomes. A retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients below 1500g that underwent placement of a peripherally inserted central catheter under ultrasound guidance between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2014 at a single center. All patients had multiple previous attempts at PICC placement by experienced NICU vascular access nurses prior to referral. Complications were determined based on clinical and procedural notes. A total of ten patients were found during the study period. The average estimated gestational age was 29.8weeks (range 26-38weeks).The average weight at the time of PICC insertion was 968g (range 485-1390g). All attempts at placement were successful. There were no complications directly related to PICC insertion. Ultrasound guided PICC line placements using ultrasound is an effective technique, which can be applied to very low and extremely low birth weight infants, with excellent success rates and a low risk of complications.

Fatores de risco para infecção de corrente sanguínea associada ao cateter central de inserção periférica em neonatos

Resumo Objetivo Identificar os fatores de risco para infecção de corrente sanguínea associada ao cateter central de inserção periférica em neonatos. Métodos Estudo de coorte prospectivo conduzido em unidade de terapia intensiva com recém-nascidos submetidos à instalação de 401 cateteres centrais de inserção periférica. Características clínicas do neonato, técnica de inserção do cateter, terapia intravenosa e tempo de permanência do cateter foram testados como fatores de risco para remoção por infecção de corrente sanguínea associada ao cateter, por meio de análise bivariada e análise multivariada com regressão de Poisson. Resultados Os dados sugerem que as menores médias de peso e idade gestacional corrigida, bem como o maior tempo de permanência do cateter estiveram associados à ocorrência de infecção de corrente sanguínea associada ao cateter. A menor idade gestacional corrigida, os diagnósticos clínicos de transtorno transitório do metabolismo e apneia, e o uso do cateter de duas vias foram identificados como fatores de risco. Conclusão A menor idade gestacional corrigida do neonato, os diagnósticos clínicos de transtorno transitório do metabolismo e apneia, e o uso do cateter de duas vias foram identificados como fatores de risco para infecção de corrente sanguínea associada ao cateter central de inserção periférica em neonatos.

The use of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Neonates - Are they safe?

The use of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Neonates - Are they safe?

Peripherally inserted central catheter in neonates: A safe and easy insertion technique

PurposePeripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are used extensively in neonates. However, insertion of these thinnest catheters is a very delicate procedure. We developed an easy and safe insertion technique for 2-French (F) PICCs with a new fine-tipped introducer cannula created without modifying commercial products by advancing a 24-gauge peripheral venous cannula through a half-peeled (20-gauge) introducer cannula. We evaluated neonates treated with our new PICC insertion technique. MethodsInformation was collected retrospectively on all 32 2-F PICCs inserted during the 4-year period from November 2010 to November 2014. We monitored neonates, recording the success rate of placement, number of insertion attempts, reasons for removal, and complications. ResultsIn total, 32 2-F PICCs were placed in 31 patients (19 (61%) males and 12 (39%) females; median age 7 (range: 1–36) days, median weight 2200 (range: 800–4100) g) using the new technique. The vein accessed most commonly was the long saphenous vein (87%). The duration of catheterization was 10.3±4.2days. Almost all PICCs were inserted successfully (32/33, success rate 97%) and in the first venipuncture (28/32, 88%). Of the PICCs, 81% were removed after completion of therapy or upon death. Two minor bleeding complications were noted at the insertion site. ConclusionsThis novel technique is an easy and safe way of inserting a 2-F PICC in neonates. It can be used by anyone in a neonatal unit who can insert a 24-gauge peripheral venous access.