Cell-type Specific Regulatory Networks Research Articles

Dynamic regulatory module networks for inference of cell type-specific transcriptional networks.

Changes in transcriptional regulatory networks can significantly alter cell fate. To gain insight into transcriptional dynamics, several studies have profiled bulk multi-omic data sets with parallel transcriptomic and epigenomic measurements at different stages of a developmental process. However, integrating these data to infer cell type–specific regulatory networks is a major challenge. We present dynamic regulatory module networks (DRMNs), a novel approach to infer cell type–specific cis-regulatory networks and their dynamics. DRMN integrates expression, chromatin state, and accessibility to predict cis-regulators of context-specific expression, where context can be cell type, developmental stage, or time point, and uses multitask learning to capture network dynamics across linearly and hierarchically related contexts. We applied DRMNs to study regulatory network dynamics in three developmental processes, each showing different temporal relationships and measuring a different combination of regulatory genomic data sets: cellular reprogramming, liver dedifferentiation, and forward differentiation. DRMN identified known and novel regulators driving cell type–specific expression patterns, showing its broad applicability to examine dynamics of gene regulatory networks from linearly and hierarchically related multi-omic data sets.

Promoter/enhancer-based controllability of regulatory networks

Understanding the mechanisms of tissue-specific transcriptional regulation is crucial as mis-regulation can cause a broad range of diseases. Here, we investigated transcription factors (TF) that are indispensable for the topological control of tissue specific and cell-type specific regulatory networks as a function of their binding to regulatory elements on promoters and enhancers of corresponding target genes. In particular, we found that promoter-binding TFs that were indispensable for regulatory network control regulate genes that are tissue-specifically expressed and overexpressed in corresponding cancer types. In turn, indispensable, enhancer-binding TFs were enriched with disease and signaling genes as they control an increasing number of cell-type specific regulatory networks. Their target genes were cell-type specific for blood and immune-related cell-types and over-expressed in blood-related cancers. Notably, target genes of indispensable enhancer-binding TFs in cell-type specific regulatory networks were enriched with cancer drug targets, while target genes of indispensable promoter-binding TFs were bona-fide targets of cancer drugs in corresponding tissues. Our results emphasize the significant role control analysis of regulatory networks plays in our understanding of transcriptional regulation, demonstrating potential therapeutic implications in tissue-specific drug discovery research.

Super interactive promoters provide insight into cell type-specific regulatory networks in blood lineage cell types.

Existing studies of chromatin conformation have primarily focused on potential enhancers interacting with gene promoters. By contrast, the interactivity of promoters per se, while equally critical to understanding transcriptional control, has been largely unexplored, particularly in a cell type-specific manner for blood lineage cell types. In this study, we leverage promoter capture Hi-C data across a compendium of blood lineage cell types to identify and characterize cell type-specific super-interactive promoters (SIPs). Notably, promoter-interacting regions (PIRs) of SIPs are more likely to overlap with cell type-specific ATAC-seq peaks and GWAS variants for relevant blood cell traits than PIRs of non-SIPs. Moreover, PIRs of cell-type-specific SIPs show enriched heritability of relevant blood cell trait (s), and are more enriched with GWAS variants associated with blood cell traits compared to PIRs of non-SIPs. Further, SIP genes tend to express at a higher level in the corresponding cell type. Importantly, SIP subnetworks incorporating cell-type-specific SIPs and ATAC-seq peaks help interpret GWAS variants. Examples include GWAS variants associated with platelet count near the megakaryocyte SIP gene EPHB3 and variants associated lymphocyte count near the native CD4 T-Cell SIP gene ETS1. Interestingly, around 25.7% ~ 39.6% blood cell traits GWAS variants residing in SIP PIR regions disrupt transcription factor binding motifs. Importantly, our analysis shows the potential of using promoter-centric analyses of chromatin spatial organization data to identify biologically important genes and their regulatory regions.

Super interactive promoters provide insight into cell type-specific regulatory networks in blood lineage cell types

Super interactive promoters provide insight into cell type-specific regulatory networks in blood lineage cell types

Discover novel disease-associated genes based on regulatory networks of long-range chromatin interactions.

Identifying genes and non-coding genetic variants that are genetically associated with complex diseases and the underlying mechanisms is one of the most important questions in functional genomics. Due to the limited statistical power and the lack of mechanistic modeling, traditional genome-wide association studies (GWAS) is restricted to fully address this question. Based on multi-omics data integration, cell-type specific regulatory networks can be built to improve GWAS analysis. In this study, we developed a new computational infrastructure, APRIL, to incorporate 3D chromatin interactions into regulatory network construction, which can extend the networks to include long-range cis-regulatory links between non-coding GWAS SNPs and target genes. Combinatorial transcription factors that co-regulate groups of genes are also inferred to further expand the networks with trans-regulation. A suite of machine learning predictions and statistical tests are incorporated in APRIL to predict novel disease-associated genes based on the expanded regulatory networks. Important features of non-coding regulatory elements and genetic variants are prioritized in network-based predictions, providing systems-level insights on the mechanisms of transcriptional dysregulation associated with complex diseases.

Chromatin three-dimensional interactions mediate genetic effects on gene expression.

Studying the genetic basis of gene expression and chromatin organization is key to characterizing the effect of genetic variability on the function and structure of the human genome. Here we unravel how genetic variation perturbs gene regulation using a dataset combining activity of regulatory elements, gene expression, and genetic variants across 317 individuals and two cell types. We show that variability in regulatory activity is structured at the intra- and interchromosomal levels within 12,583 cis-regulatory domains and 30 trans-regulatory hubs that highly reflect the local (that is, topologically associating domains) and global (that is, open and closed chromatin compartments) nuclear chromatin organization. These structures delimit cell type-specific regulatory networks that control gene expression and coexpression and mediate the genetic effects of cis- and trans-acting regulatory variants on genes.

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus-Associated Genetic Variants Contribute to Overlapping Immune Regulatory Networks.

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by the autoimmune destruction of insulin-producing pancreatic islet beta cells in genetically predisposed individuals. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified over 60 risk regions across the human genome, marked by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which confer genetic predisposition to T1D. There is increasing evidence that disease-associated SNPs can alter gene expression through spatial interactions that involve distal loci, in a tissue- and development-specific manner. Here, we used three-dimensional (3D) genome organization data to identify genes that physically co-localized with DNA regions that contained T1D-associated SNPs in the nucleus. Analysis of these SNP-gene pairs using the Genotype-Tissue Expression database identified a subset of SNPs that significantly affected gene expression. We identified 246 spatially regulated genes including HLA-DRB1, LAT, MICA, BTN3A2, CTLA4, CD226, NOTCH1, TRIM26, PTEN, TYK2, CTSH, and FLRT3, which exhibit tissue-specific effects in multiple tissues. We observed that the T1D-associated variants interconnect through networks that form part of the immune regulatory pathways, including immune-cell activation, cytokine signaling, and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1). Our results implicate T1D-associated variants in tissue and cell-type specific regulatory networks that contribute to pancreatic beta cell inflammation and destruction, adaptive immune signaling, and immune-cell proliferation and activation. A number of other regulatory changes we identified are not typically considered to be central to the pathology of T1D. Collectively, our data represent a novel resource for the hypothesis-driven development of diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic interventions in T1D.

Integrating motif, DNA accessibility and gene expression data to build regulatory maps in an organism.

Characterization of cell type specific regulatory networks and elements is a major challenge in genomics, and emerging strategies frequently employ high-throughput genome-wide assays of transcription factor (TF) to DNA binding, histone modifications or chromatin state. However, these experiments remain too difficult/expensive for many laboratories to apply comprehensively to their system of interest. Here, we explore the potential of elucidating regulatory systems in varied cell types using computational techniques that rely on only data of gene expression, low-resolution chromatin accessibility, and TF–DNA binding specificities (‘motifs’). We show that static computational motif scans overlaid with chromatin accessibility data reasonably approximate experimentally measured TF–DNA binding. We demonstrate that predicted binding profiles and expression patterns of hundreds of TFs are sufficient to identify major regulators of ∼200 spatiotemporal expression domains in the Drosophila embryo. We are then able to learn reliable statistical models of enhancer activity for over 70 expression domains and apply those models to annotate domain specific enhancers genome-wide. Throughout this work, we apply our motif and accessibility based approach to comprehensively characterize the regulatory network of fruitfly embryonic development and show that the accuracy of our computational method compares favorably to approaches that rely on data from many experimental assays.

The Importance of Being Specified: Cell Fate Decisions and Their Role in Cell Biology

The Importance of Being Specified: Cell Fate Decisions and Their Role in Cell Biology