Cefazolin Concentrations Research Articles

Target Attainment and Population Pharmacokinetics of Cefazolin in Patients with Invasive Staphylococcus aureus Infections: A Prospective Cohort Study.

This study aimed to determine cefazolin target attainment in patients with invasive Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) infections and to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model. Adult patients with invasive S. aureus infections treated with cefazolin bolus infusions were included. Unbound and total trough and mid-dose cefazolin concentrations were measured, and strain-specific MICs were determined. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients attaining 100% fT>MIC at all time points evaluated. A population PK model was developed, using non-linear mixed-effects modelling. Overall, 51 patients were included, with a total of 226 unbound and total cefazolin concentrations measured (mean: 4.4 per patient). The median daily dosage in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of >60 mL/min/m2 was 8 g. The median age was 74 years (interquartile range (IQR) 57-82) and 26% were female. A history of chronic kidney disease and acute kidney injury were present in 10/51 (19.6%) and 6/51 (11.7%), respectively. Achievement of 100% fT>MIC occurred in 86% of the patients and decreased to 45% when a target of 100% fT>4xMIC was evaluated. The mean unbound cefazolin fraction was 27.0% (standard deviation (SD) 13.4). Measured and estimated mean cefazolin trough concentrations differed significantly [13.1 mg/L (SD 23.5) vs. 7.4 mg/L (SD 7.9), p < 0.001]. In the population PK model, elevated estimated creatinine clearance and bolus instead of continuous application were covariates for target non-attainment. In conclusion, cefazolin target achievement was high, and the measurement of the unbound cefazolin concentration may be favored. The Monte Carlo simulations indicated that target attainment was significantly improved with continuous infusion.

Population pharmacokinetics of unbound cefazolin in infected hospitalized patients requiring intermittent high-flux haemodialysis: can a three-times-weekly post-dialysis dosing regimen provide optimal treatment?

To describe the population pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in infected hospitalized patients requiring intermittent haemodialysis (IHD). This prospective population pharmacokinetic study was conducted in IHD patients prescribed cefazolin 2 g three times weekly. Plasma samples were collected at prespecified timepoints and assayed for total and unbound concentrations using validated LC. Pharmacokinetic modelling and dosing simulations were performed using Pmetrics®. PTA in plasma suitable for MSSA (unbound trough concentrations of ≥2 mg/L for the final 24 h of a 72 h interval) were simulated for different dosing regimens. A PTA of ≥95% was deemed acceptable. A total of 260 cefazolin concentrations (130 total, 130 unbound) were collected from 16 patients (14 female) with a median age of 51 years. The median (IQR) pre-dialysis unbound cefazolin concentration for a 3 day dose interval trough was 17.7 (13.5-31.4) mg/L. The median (IQR) unbound fraction was 0.38 (0.32-0.46). The lowest pre-dialysis unbound concentration was 9.1 mg/L. A two-compartment model with a complex protein-binding component adequately described the data. The mean unbound cefazolin CL during IHD was 16.4 ± 4.26 L/h, compared with 0.40 ± 0.19 L/h when dialysis was off. Duration of time on haemodialysis (TOH) was the only covariate supported in the final model. The 2 g three-times-weekly regimen was associated with a PTA of 99.7% on dosing simulations to maintain unbound concentrations of ≥2 mg/L with TOH of 6 months. The 1 g three-times-weekly post-dialysis was associated with a PTA of 95.4%. A 2 g three-times-weekly post-dialysis cefazolin regimen is supported for MSSA infections.

Tourniquet Use and Local Tissue Concentrations of Cefazolin During Total Knee Arthroplasty

Prophylactic administration of antibiotics before skin incision is an important component in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection in arthroplasty surgery. For antibiotics to be effective, the local tissue concentration (LTC) must exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration of typical infecting organisms; however, the LTC of cefazolin during arthroplasty is poorly understood. To compare the systemic concentration of cefazolin in serum with the LTC in fat, synovium, and bone during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) while assessing the effect of tourniquet inflation. This prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted from March 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023, in patients undergoing TKA at a single academic center. Total knee arthroplasty with or without a limb tourniquet. Systemic blood and local tissues from the surgical site (fat, synovium, and bone) were harvested at regular intervals during the surgery. The primary outcome was the LTC of cefazolin, quantified using the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry technique. A total of 59 patients were included in the study, with 29 in the tourniquet group (mean [SD] age, 69.3 [9.6] years; 23 [79.3%] female) and 30 in the no tourniquet group (mean [SD] age, 69.9 [9.7] years; 21 [70.0%] female). In patients undergoing TKA without a tourniquet, the mean concentration of cefazolin in serum was 71.9 μg/mL (95% CI, 66.4-77.5 μg/mL), whereas the mean LTCs were 13.9 μg/g (95% CI, 12.1-15.7 μg/g) in fat, 27.7 μg/g (95% CI, 24.3-31.0 μg/g) in synovium, and 17.7 μg/g (95% CI, 14.8-20.5 μg/g) in bone. For patients undergoing TKA with a tourniquet, the mean concentration of cefazolin in serum was 72.0 μg/mL (95% CI, 66.3-77.7 μg/mL), and the mean LTCs were 9.9 μg/g (95% CI, 8.7-11.1 μg/g) in fat, 21.8 μg/g (95% CI, 18.7-25.0 μg/g) in synovium, and 13.0 μg/g (95% CI, 10.8-15.2 μg/g) in bone. The use of a tourniquet resulted in significantly lower mean LTCs by 60 minutes after cefazolin infusion (10.8 μg/g [95% CI, 9.1-12.4 μg/g] vs 16.9 μg/g [95% CI, 14.1-19.6 μg/g], P = .001 in fat; 18.9 μg/g [95% CI, 14.1-23.6 μg/g] vs 25.8 μg/g [95% CI, 21.4-30.3 μg/g], P = .03 in synovium; and 11.8 μg/g [95% CI, 9.3-14.2 μg/g] vs 19.4 μg/g [95% CI, 14.5-24.4 μg/g], P = .007 in bone). In this randomized clinical trial, the concentration of cefazolin was lower in local tissues (fat, synovium, and bone) than in systemic blood, and the use of a limb tourniquet further significantly reduced these concentrations. Although the current prophylactic dosing regimen for cefazolin provides sufficient serum concentrations, the levels in the periarticular tissue during TKA may be insufficient to prevent periprosthetic joint infection. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05604157.

Effect of Blood Product Resuscitation on Cefazolin Pharmacokinetics in Trauma Patients.

Background: Antibiotics are frequently administered prophylactically to trauma patients with various injury patterns to prevent infectious complications. Trauma patients may also require large volume resuscitation with blood products. Limited data are available to support antibiotic dosing recommendations in this population. We hypothesized that we would be able to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of cefazolin, a frequently used antibiotic in the trauma scenario, from remnant blood samples by pharmacokinetic analysis of trauma patients. Methods: Remnant plasma from standard of care chemistry/hematology assessments was retrieved within 48 h of collection and assayed to determine cefazolin concentrations. Population pharmacokinetic analyses were conducted in Pmetrics using R. Linear regression was conducted to assess the effect of blood product resuscitation volume on cefazolin pharmacokinetic parameters. Results: Cefazolin concentrations best fitted a two-compartment model (Akaike information criterion: 443.9). The mean ± standard deviation parameters were total body clearance (4.3 ± 1.9L), volume of the central compartment (Vc: 7.7 ± 6.9L), and intercompartment transfer constants (k12: 1.3 ± 0.98 h-1, k21: 0.6 ± 0.45 h-1). No statistical relationships were observed between blood products, volume of blood products, and cefazolin clearance or Vc (R2: 0.0004-0.21, p = 0.08-0.95). Using a 5,000-patient Monte Carlo simulation, 2 g with repeated dosing every 2 h until end of surgery was required to achieve 93.2% probability of 100% free time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (fT > MIC) at the ECOFF value for Staphylococcus aureus (2 mg/L). Conclusions: In these 15 trauma patients receiving blood transfusion, no relationship with blood volume resuscitation and cefazolin pharmacokinetics was observed. On the basis of this pharmacokinetic model, frequent cefazolin doses are required to maintain 100% fT > MIC.

Plasma and tissue concentrations of 2 g prophylactic cefazolin prior to lower extremity surgery.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most clinically relevant complications and the use of prophylactic cefazolin is common practice. However, the knowledge about the pharmacological aspects of prophylactic cefazolin in the lower extremities remains limited. In this prospective cohort, a sub-study of the WIFI-2 randomized controlled trial, adults between 18 and 75 years of age who were scheduled for implant removal below the level of the knee and randomized for cefazolin, was included. A maximum of two venous plasma, target-site plasma, and target-site tissue samples were taken during surgery. The primary outcomes were the cefazolin concentrations in venous plasma, target-site plasma, and target-site tissue. A total of 27 patients [median (interquartile range) age, 42 (29-59) years; 17 (63%) male] with 138 samples were included in the study. A minimum of 6 weeks follow-up was available for all patients. The mean (SD) venous plasma, target-site plasma, and target-site tissue concentrations were 36 (13) µg/mL, 29 (13) µg/mL, and 28 (13) µg/g, respectively, and the cefazolin concentrations between the different locations of surgery did not differ significantly in both target-site plasma and target-site tissue (P = 0.822 and P = 0.840). In conclusion, 2 g of prophylactic cefazolin demonstrates adequacy in maintaining coverage for a duration of at least 80 minutes of surgery below the level of the knee, significantly surpassing the MIC90 required to combat the most prevalent microorganisms. This study represents the first of its kind to assess cefazolin concentrations in the lower extremities by examining both plasma and tissue samples in this magnitude.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic target attainment analysis of cefazolin using total and unbound serum concentration in patients with prostatectomy or nephrectomy.

The aim of this study was to analyze the population pharmacokinetics of total and unbound concentrations of prophylactic cefazolin (CFZ) in patients with prostatectomy or nephrectomy. We also aimed to calculate a pharmacodynamics target unbound concentration that exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), to design an effective dosing regimen. Briefly, 614 total concentration and 610 unbound concentration samples from 152 individuals were evaluated, using a nonlinear mixed-effects model. The obtained pharmacodynamics index target value reflected the probability of maintaining CFZ unbound trough concentrations exceeding MIC90, 0.5 mg/L, and MIC50, and 1.0 mg/L, to account for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) or Escherichia coli. Population pharmacokinetics were estimated using a two-compartment model with nonlinear protein binding. Unbound systemic clearance (CL) was significantly associated with creatinine clearance, while the maximum protein-binding constant was significantly associated with albumin levels. The probability of achieving an unbound concentration exceeding the MIC50 for E. coli or MIC90 for MSSA in a patient with normal renal function following a 1 g CFZ infusion over 15 min was above 90% at 3 h after the initial dose. Our findings indicated that population pharmacokinetic parameters are useful for determining unbound CFZ pharmacokinetics and evaluating intraoperative CFZ redosing intervals.

Population pharmacokinetic meta-analysis of five beta-lactams antibiotics to support dosing regimens in dogs for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis

The Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship of antimicrobial drugs (AMD) for surgical prophylaxis has been poorly studied, hampering evidence-based decision making around AMD dosing and timing. Our objective is to use PK/PD principles to inform (1) the timing of administration and (2) the interval for re-administration of AMD used peri-operatively in dogs. Raw plasma concentrations of cefazolin, cefuroxime, cefalexin, amoxicillin and ampicillin were retrieved from original intravenous studies performed in dogs. E. coli and methicillin-susceptible staphylococci were identified as possible intraoperative contaminants and their epidemiological cut-offs (ECOFF) were retrieved from the EUCAST database. Individual PK data were refitted with non-linear mixed effect models (Phoenix®). We performed Monte Carlo simulation to compute i) the 95th percentile of time of peak concentration in the peripheral compartment (informing timing between administration and first incision) and ii) the duration for which at least 90% of dogs maintain a free plasma concentration above ECOFF (informing timing of re-administration: 1.5–4 h). Cefazolin (22–25 mg/kg), cefuroxime (20 mg/kg), cefalexin (15 mg/kg) and amoxicillin (16.7 mg/kg) reached peak peripheral concentrations within 30 min, but ampicillin (20 mg/kg) required 82 min, respectively. For methicillin-susceptible staphylococci, cefazolin and cefuroxime require re-administration every 2 h, whereas cefalexin and both amoxicillin and ampicillin can be readministered every 3 and 4 h, respectively. For E. coli, only cefazolin provided adequate perioperative coverage with 2-hourly administration, where cefuroxime and cefalexin failed uniformly. Alternatively, ampicillin and amoxicillin (critically ill dogs) may cover E. coli contaminations, but only if readministered every 1.5 h. These PK-derived conclusions provide a rationale for perioperative AMD administration timing.

Corrosion Inhibition of Expired Cefazolin Drug on Copper Metal in Dilute Hydrochloric Acid Solution: Practical and Theoretical Approaches.

In this work, we studied the corrosion of Cu metal in 0.5 mol L-1 HCl and the inhibition effect of the expired Cefazolin drug. The inhibition efficiency (IE) of Cefazolin varied according to its concentration in solution. As the Cefazolin concentration increased to 300 ppm, the IE increased to 87% at 298 K and decreased to 78% as the temperature increased to 318 K. The expired drug functioned as a mixed-type inhibitor. The adsorption of the drug on the copper surface followed Temkin's adsorption model. The magnitudes of the standard free energy change (ΔGoads) and adsorption equilibrium constant (Kads) indicated the spontaneous nature and exothermicity of the adsorption process. Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques showed that the drug molecules were strongly attached to the Cu surface. The electrochemical frequency modulation (EFM), potentiodynamic polarization (PP), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) results were in good agreement with the results of the weight loss (WL) method. The density functional tight-binding (DFTB) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulation results indicated that the expired drug bound to the copper surface through the lone pair of electrons of the heteroatoms as well as the π-electrons of the tetrazole ring. The adsorption energy between the drug and copper metal was -459.38 kJ mol-1.

Prolonged efficacy of cefazolin in intraosseous regional prophylaxis for total knee arthroplasty: a rabbit model study

BackgroundA novel approach known as intraosseous regional administration (IORA) has emerged as a technique for delivering prophylactic antibiotics, and it results in higher tissue concentrations around the knee. It is hypothesized that IORA of cefazolin for antibiotic prophylaxis during total knee arthroplasty will result in sustained effective levels for a longer duration. The aim of the current study was to investigate temporal changes in peri-knee cefazolin blood concentrations after IORA of cefazolin.MethodsTwelve rabbits were randomly divided into two groups, with six rabbits in each group. In control group a single intravenous bolus injection of cefazolin (10 mL, 100 mg) was administered into the marginal ear vein. In experimental groupexperimental group the same dose of cefazolin was injected into the left tibial marrow cavity after tourniquet inflation at the base of the left thigh. Blood samples were collected periodically at different timepoints, and cefazolin concentrations were determined.ResultsThe intraosseous treatment resulted in significant differences in plasma cefazolin concentrations at all timepoints. Experimental group exhibited higher plasma cefazolin concentrations than control group.ConclusionsCefazolin in intraosseous regional prophylaxis exhibits effectiveness in intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis by maintaining concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration for extended durations, rather than relying solely on high concentrations.

Pharmacokinetics of Locally Applied Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

Antibiotic irrigation of breast implants is widely used internationally, but no clinical study has investigated the pharmacokinetics of antibiotic prophylaxis in the breast implant pocket. To evaluate how long locally applied gentamicin, cefazolin, and vancomycin concentrations in the implant pocket remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for the most common bacterial infections and to measure systemic uptake. This prospective cohort study was performed at the Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, between October 25, 2021, and September 22, 2022, among 40 patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction who were part of the ongoing BREAST-AB trial (Prophylactic Treatment of Breast Implants With a Solution of Gentamicin, Vancomycin and Cefazolin Antibiotics for Women Undergoing Breast Reconstructive Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial). Patients were randomized to receive locally applied gentamicin, cefazolin, and vancomycin or placebo. Samples were obtained from the surgical breast drain and blood up to 10 days postoperatively. The breast implant and the implant pocket were irrigated with 160 μg/mL of gentamicin, 2000 μg/mL of cefazolin, and 2000 μg/mL of vancomycin in a 200-mL saline solution. The primary outcome was the duration of antibiotic concentrations above the MIC breakpoint for Staphylococcus aureus according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: gentamicin, 4 μg/mL; cefazolin, 2 μg/mL; and vancomycin, 2 μg/mL. Secondary outcomes included the time above the MIC for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other relevant bacteria, as well as systemic uptake. The study included 40 patients (median age, 44.6 years [IQR, 38.3-51.4 years]; median body mass index, 23.9 [IQR, 21.7-25.9]) with a median number of 3 drain samples (range, 1-10 drain samples) and 2 blood samples (range, 0-6 blood samples). Vancomycin and cefazolin remained above the MIC for S aureus significantly longer than gentamicin (gentamicin, 0.9 days [95% CI, 0.5-1.2 days] for blood samples vs 6.9 days [95% CI, 2.9 to 10.9 days] for vancomycin [P = .02] vs 3.7 days [95% CI, 2.2-5.2 days] for cefazolin [P = .002]). The gentamicin level remained above the MIC for P aeruginosa for 1.3 days (95% CI, 1.0-1.5 days). Only cefazolin was detectable in blood samples, albeit in very low concentrations (median concentration, 0.04 μg/mL [range, 0.007-0.1 μg/mL]). This study suggests that patients treated with triple-antibiotic implant irrigation during breast reconstruction receive adequate prophylaxis for S aureus and other common implant-associated, gram-positive bacteria. However, the protection against P aeruginosa may be inadequate.

Pharmacokinetic analysis of ceftazidime and cefazolin in the treatment of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis

Objective Peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis (PDRP) presents a significant challenge for nephrologists. Continuous intraperitoneal cefazolin and ceftazidime are recommended for the treatment of peritonitis. However, some pharmacokinetic studies have shown that doses of 15–20 mg/kg/d may not achieve sufficient therapeutic levels. In this study, we investigated the pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime and cefazolin in patients with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis and compared the pharmacokinetic characteristics between traditional and modified treatment groups. Methods From February 2017 to December 2019, 42 PDRP patients (17 males, 25 females; mean age: 50.7 ± 12.1 years; mean body weight: 60.9 ± 11.8 kg) were recruited for the study, all participants were anuric. Twenty patients were enrolled in the traditional group and treated with cefazolin (1.0 g) and ceftazidime (1.0 g) via intraperitoneal administration once daily for 14 days. Twenty-two patients were enrolled in the modified group and received the same dose of antibiotics twice daily for the initial five days, followed by once daily for the subsequent nine days. Serum and dialysate samples were collected after days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 and analyzed via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Results In the traditional group, the highest and lowest serum concentrations of ceftazidime were 35.9 and 21.7 µg/mL, respectively. The highest concentration of cefazolin was 54.6 µg/mL on day 5 and the lowest concentration was 30.4 µg/mL on day 1. In the modified group, the highest and lowest serum concentrations of ceftazidime were 102.2 and 54.8 µg/mL, respectively. The highest concentration of cefazolin was 141.7 µg/mL and the lowest concentration was 79.8 µg/mL. All antibiotic concentrations were above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) level (8 µg/mL of ceftazidime and 2 µg/mL of cefazolin) throughout the treatment period. However, on day 1, the concentration of ceftazidime in the third bag of dialysate effluent from the traditional group fell below the MIC level. Despite remaining above the MIC, cefazolin concentration was consistently lower in the third bag of dialysate effluent from the traditional group throughout the treatment period. Conclusions Intraperitoneal administration of cefazolin and ceftazidime at a dose of 1 g twice daily for 5 days and then once daily for the rest of the treatment period ensured adequate therapeutic levels of antibiotics for treating anuric PDRP patients.

2533. Cerebrospinal Fluid Penetration of Cefazolin and Flucloxacillin in Children

Abstract Background Effective treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus meningitis requires antimicrobial penetration into the CSF. Anti-staphylococcal penicillins, including flucloxacillin, are generally recommended as first-line treatment. However, some evidence suggests that the first-generation cephalosporin, cefazolin, may be an appropriate alternative. We investigated the CSF concentration of cefazolin and flucloxacillin in children. Methods CSF samples from children aged 0-18 years treated with cefazolin or flucloxacillin were collected when there was sample remaining after diagnostic tests were completed. Unbound antibiotic concentrations of cefazolin and flucloxacillin were measured. Results Overall, 222 CSF samples were collected from 163 children, median age 12 months (range 0.0-17.5 years). Of these, 157 were collected while the antibiotic was at steady state. For cefazolin, children ≤1 year had a higher median CSF concentration compared with those &amp;gt;1 year (1.8 versus 0.5 mg/L, p&amp;lt; 0.001), whereas for flucloxacillin the concentration was similar between the two age groups (0.2 versus 0.1 mg/L, p=0.9). In infants aged ≥ 1 month to 1 year, the CSF concentration of both antibiotics was higher in those with pleocytosis (WCC &amp;gt;5 x106/L) than those without (flucloxacillin 0.2 versus 0.065 mg/L, cefazolin 5.6 versus 1.06 mg/L). Notably, only those aged ≤1 year receiving cefazolin (7/12; 58%) achieved steady state CSF concentrations above the CLSI breakpoint for sensitive S. aureus (MIC ≤2 mg/L). Conclusion CSF penetration of cefazolin was higher in younger infants and for both antibiotics was higher in those with pleocytosis. In most children, the CSF concentrations in the CSF for either cefazolin or flucloxacillin were not above the S. aureus MIC. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

External validation of a pharmacokinetic model for target-controlled infusion of cefazolin as a prophylactic antibiotic.

This study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of previously constructed cefazolin pharmacokinetic models and determine whether cefazolin administration via the target-controlled infusion (TCI) method may be possible in clinical practice. Twenty-five gastrectomy patients receiving cefazolin as a prophylactic antibiotic were enrolled. Two grams of cefazolin was dissolved in 50 mL of normal saline to give a concentration of 40 mg mL-1 . Before skin incision, cefazolin was administered using a TCI syringe pump, and its administration continued until the end of surgery. The target total plasma concentration was set to 100 μg mL-1 . Total and unbound plasma concentrations of cefazolin were measured in three arterial blood samples collected at 30, 60 and 120 min after the start of cefazolin administration. The predictive performance of the TCI system was evaluated using four measures: inaccuracy, divergence, bias and wobble. Total (n = 75) and unbound (n = 75) plasma concentration measurements from 25 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled median (95% confidence interval) biases and inaccuracies were 6.3 (4.0-8.5) and 10.5 (8.6-12.4) for the total concentration model and -10.3 (-16.8 to -3.7) and 22.4 (18.2-26.7) for the unbound concentration model, respectively. All unbound concentrations were above 10μg mL-1 . Administration of cefazolin by the TCI method showed a clinically acceptable performance. Applying the TCI method by setting the total concentration as the target concentration rather than the unbound concentration is effective in maintaining a constant target concentration of cefazolin.

Impact of Blast Overpressure on the Pharmacokinetics of Various Antibiotics in Sprague Dawley Rats.

Combat injuries are complex and multimodal. Most injuries to the extremities occur because of explosive devices such as improvised explosive devices. Blast exposure dramatically increases the risk of infection in combat wounds, and there is limited available information on the best antibiotic treatments for these injuries. We previously demonstrated that mice exposed to blast displayed a delayed clearance of cefazolin from the plasma and liver; further semi-mechanistic modeling determined that cefazolin concentrations in the skin of these mice were reduced. Our objective was to investigate the effects of blast on the pharmacokinetics of antibiotics of different types used for the treatment of combat wounds in the rat model. Male Sprague Dawley rats were exposed to blast overpressure followed by injection of a bolus of animal equivalent doses of an antibiotic (cefazolin, cefepime, ertapenem, or clindamycin) into the tail vein at 1-hour post-blast exposure. Blood was collected at predetermined time points via repeated sampling from the tail vein. Animals were also euthanized at predetermined time points, at which time liver, kidney, skin, and blood via cardiac puncture were collected. Antibiotic concentrations were determined by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Blast-exposed rats exhibited a similar rate of clearance compared to non-blasted rats in the blood, liver, kidney, and skin, which is inconsistent with the data regarding cefazolin in blast-exposed mice. Our results in rats do not recapitulate our previous observation of delayed cefazolin clearance in mice following the blast overpressure exposure. Although using rats permitted us to collect multiple blood samples from the same animals, rats may not be a suitable model for measuring the pharmacokinetics of antibiotics following blast. The interpretation of the results may be challenging because of variation in data among rat subjects in the same sample groups.

Higher cefazolin concentrations in synovial fluid with intraosseous regional prophylaxis in knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Prophylactic antibiotics reduce the risk of periprosthetic joint infection. However, conventional systemic administration may not provide adequate tissue concentrations against more resistant organisms such as coagulase-negative staphylococci. Intraosseous regional administration is known to achieve significantly higher antibiotic tissue concentrations than systemic administration, but it is unclear how synovial fluid concentrations are affected. We aimed to compare synovial fluid cefazolin concentrations achieved by regional intraosseous versus systemic intravenous administration, and also to compare synovial fluid cefazolin concentrations with those in subcutaneous fat. A total of 60 patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty were randomized into 2 groups: group IO received 2g interosseous cefazolin in 100mL saline through a tibial cannula after tourniquet inflation and before skin incision; group IV received 2g cefazolin in 100mL saline via the median basilic or median cephalic vein 30min before tourniquet inflation. Subcutaneous fat and synovial fluid samples were collected immediately after skin incision, and cefazolin concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. The cefazolin concentration in synovial fluid was 391.3 ± 70.1μg/ml in group IO and 17.6 ± 3.5μg/ml in group IV. The cefazolin concentration in subcutaneous fat was 247.9 ± 64.9μg/g in group IO and 11.4 ± 1.9μg/g in group IV. Intraosseous regional administration results in several times higher tissue concentrations than systemic administration, especially in the synovial fluid.

Peri-operative pharmacokinetics of cefazolin prophylaxis during valve replacement surgery.

There is little prospective data to guide effective dosing for antibiotic prophylaxis during surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We aim to describe the effects of CPB on the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of total and unbound concentrations of cefazolin and to recommend optimised dosing regimens. Patients undergoing CPB for elective cardiac valve replacement were included using convenience sampling. Intravenous cefazolin (2g) was administered pre-incision and re-dosed at 4 hours. Serial blood and urine samples were collected and analysed using validated chromatography. Population PK modelling and Monte-Carlo simulations were performed using Pmetrics® to determine the fractional target attainment (FTA) of achieving unbound concentrations exceeding pre-defined exposures against organisms known to cause surgical site infections for 100% of surgery (100% fT>MIC). From the 16 included patients, 195 total and 64 unbound concentrations of cefazolin were obtained. A three-compartment linear population PK model best described the data. We observed that cefazolin 2g 4-hourly was insufficient to achieve the FTA of 100% fT>MIC for Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli at serum creatinine concentrations ≤ 50 μmol/L and for Staphylococcus epidermidis at any of our simulated doses and serum creatinine concentrations. A dose of cefazolin 3g 4-hourly demonstrated >93% FTA for S. aureus and E. coli. We found that cefazolin 2g 4-hourly was not able to maintain concentrations above the MIC for relevant pathogens in patients with low serum creatinine concentrations undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. The simulations showed that optimised dosing is more likely with an increased dose and/or dosing frequency.

Plasma concentration of prophylactic cefazolin best correlates with lean body mass measured by bioimpedance analysis in lumbar spine surgery: Results of a pilot study

The aim of this study was to determine the association between measures of body composition and the concentration of plasma and paraspinal muscle cefazolin. Secondly, we aimed to confirm the efficacy of our hospital dosing regimen in achieving the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) at the surgical site. Patients undergoing posterior-based lumbar spine surgery had body composition analysed using bioimpedance analysis. All received 2 g of cefazolin at anaesthetic induction in line with hospital guidelines. Cefazolin concentration was measured in plasma (30-minites) and muscle (30- and 60-minuites) using high-performance liquid chromatography. 20 patients were recruited (mean age 61.5 years; 12 female). Mean plasma cefazolin concentrations were 34.1 +/− 10.2 mg/L; mean muscle concentrations 44.4 +/− 18.6 mg/kg and 43.8 +/− 20.4 mg/kg at 30- and 60-minutes respectively. Univariate analysis showed significant correlation between plasma cefazolin concentration and lean mass weight, absolute body weight, height, dry lean mass, total water, total body water, extracellular and intracellular water volume. Linear regression analysis showed lean mass weight the best predictor of plasma cefazolin concentration. Muscle cefazolin concentration was dependent on the plasma concentration. Using a MIC of 2 mg/L and 2 mg/kg for Staphylococcus aureus, MIC was achieved in all samples. In summary, plasma cefazolin concentration was best predicted by lean body mass. Further work should consider the influence of body composition on antibiotic delivery in extremes of body mass index. Local hospital guidelines are effective at achieving MIC against S. aureus.

A novel method for quantification of cefazolin local tissue concentration in blood, fat, synovium, and bone marrow using liquid chromatography − mass spectrometry

To be effective, the concentration of antibiotic used must exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against infecting organisms at and in the surgical site. Few studies follow antibiotic levels for tissues that are manipulated during surgery. The aim of this work was to develop and validate a novel LC-MS method as well as an efficient extraction technique for the quantification of cefazolin in local tissues and whole blood. This method uses the same efficient extraction method across multiple tissue types affected by orthopedic surgery: blood, fat, synovium, and bone marrow. The ability to quantify cefazolin in these tissues will help identify surgical techniques and antibiotic dosing protocols that better protect patients from infection. The internal standard, 13C2,15N-cefazolin, co-elutes with cefazolin, and was used in calibration curves and tissue extracts as well as for cefazolin recovery and matrix effects. The protocol was rigorously tested, including measurements of reproducibility and calibration curve quality. The recovery of the extraction method ranges from 94% to 113% across all sample types. There is little to no matrix effect on cefazolin signal (98–120%). The developed method was used to determine cefazolin concentrations in tissues of 10 patients undergoing a total knee replacement. Cefazolin blood concentrations were approximately 500 times higher than in adipose, synovium, and bone marrow tissues. This clinical data shows that although the minimum inhibitory concentration is largely surpassed in blood, the concentration of cefazolin in fat, synovium, and bone marrow could be insufficient during a knee replacement. This method of cefazolin quantification will help surgeons optimize antibiotic concentrations in the local tissues during knee replacement surgery and potentially reduce serious post-surgical infections.

Serum and Prostatic Tissue Concentrations of Cefazolin, Ciprofloxacin and Fosfomycin after Prophylactic Use for Transurethral Resection of the Prostate.

The optimal drug of choice, its time of administration and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis in patient undergoing a TURP procedure are still matters of debate. In this study, we evaluated the concentrations of cefazolin, ciprofloxacin and fosfomycin in the human prostate in a cohort of men undergoing TURP. We compared prostate tissue concentrations to the serum concentrations and MICs of common uropathogens, to determine the appropriateness of the current presurgical prophylactic antibiotics and to gain supportive data about the suitability of fosfomycin for antibiotic prophylaxis in men undergoing urological procedures of the prostate. After a single intravenous dose of cefazoline or an oral dose of ciprofloxacin prior to TURP, concentrations in serum and prostate tissue of well above the MIC (EUCAST breakpoint) of common uropathogens (Enterobacterales) were reached, and both antibiotics seem potentially effective in preventing postsurgical infections. A single dose of oral and intravenous administration of fosfomycin both led to serum concentrations above the MIC for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (8 µg/mL). The MIC for other infections (32 µg/mL) was only reached after a single dose of intravenous fosfomycin. We were unable to detect fosfomycin concentrations in prostate tissue.

Frequency of pharmacological target attainment with flucloxacillin and cefazolin in invasive methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infection: a prospective cohort study in hospitalized patients

The proportion of patients with invasive methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infection who achieve target concentrations of flucloxacillin or cefazolin with standard dosing regimens is uncertain. This study measured drug concentrations in a prospective cohort of patients with invasive S. aureus infections to determine the frequency of target concentration attainment, and risk factors for failure to achieve target concentrations. Unbound flucloxacillin and cefazolin plasma concentrations were measured at the midpoint between intravenous doses. Adequate and optimal targets were defined as an unbound plasma concentration of ≥1 and ≥2 times the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (flucloxacillin 0.5 mg/L, cefazolin 2 mg/L), respectively (50%fT≥1MIC, 50%fT≥2MIC). There were 50 patients in each of the flucloxacillin and cefazolin groups. Eighty-five (85%) patients met the target of 50%fT≥2MIC and 95 (95%) patients met the target of 50%fT≥1MIC. The median unbound flucloxacillin concentration was 2.6 mg/L [interquartile range (IQR) 1.0-8.1]. The median unbound cefazolin concentration was 15.4 mg/L (IQR 8.8-28.2). A higher proportion of patients in the flucloxacillin group failed to achieve the optimal target compared with the cefazolin group [13 (26%) vs 2 (4%); P=0.002]. Younger age and higher creatinine clearance were associated with lower plasma concentrations. Standard dosing of flucloxacillin and cefazolin in the treatment of invasive MSSA infections may not achieve target plasma concentrations for a subgroup of patients. Measuring drug concentrations identifies this subgroup and facilitates dose individualization.