CDK4/6 Inhibitors Research Articles

Abstract GS1-10: Primary results from the randomized Phase II RIGHT Choice trial of premenopausal patients with aggressive HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer treated with ribociclib + endocrine therapy vs physician’s choice combination chemotherapy

Abstract Background: Combination chemotherapy (CT) remains a standard of care in advanced breast cancer (ABC) with aggressive disease features (rapidly progressing or highly symptomatic disease, including life-threatening visceral crisis). To date, no data have been published on a head-to-head comparison of CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) + endocrine therapy (ET) vs combination CT in this patient (pt) population. RIGHT Choice, a randomized, open-label, multi-national, Phase II trial, investigated the efficacy and safety of first-line ribociclib (RIB) + ET vs combination CT in pre/perimenopausal pts with HR+/HER2− ABC with aggressive disease (where combination CT is clinically indicated by physician’s judgment). Here we report the results of the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) and key secondary endpoints from this study. Methods: Pre/perimenopausal pts with HR+/HER2− ABC (>10% estrogen receptor–positive [ER+]) and no prior systemic therapy for ABC were randomized 1:1 to receive either RIB (600 mg daily, 3 weeks on/1 week off) with letrozole/anastrozole + goserelin or investigator’s choice of CT (docetaxel + capecitabine, paclitaxel + gemcitabine, or capecitabine + vinorelbine). Randomization was stratified by presence of liver metastases and whether the disease-free interval (duration from date of complete tumor resection for primary breast cancer lesion to the date of documented disease recurrence) was less than two years. Pts included in the trial had ABC not amenable to curative therapy for which combination CT was clinically indicated by physician’s judgment (i.e., symptomatic visceral metastases, rapid progression of disease or impending visceral compromise, or markedly symptomatic non-visceral disease). Median PFS (mPFS) and median time to treatment failure (mTTF) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier methods. Overall response rate (ORR) was also analyzed, with quality of life and biomarker analyses planned. RIGHT Choice is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03839823). Results: A total of 222 pts (112 RIB + ET; 110 CT) were enrolled from Feb 2019 to Nov 2021. Pts with symptomatic visceral metastases (n=150; 67.6%), rapid disease progression (n=41; 18.5%), and markedly symptomatic non-visceral metastases (n=31; 14.0%) were included. Overall, 116 pts (52.3%) had visceral crisis based on guideline definitions. A majority of pts (n=190; 85.6%) had tumors that were ≥50% ER+. At data cutoff (Apr 12, 2022), median follow-up was 24.1 mo; 45.5% and 23.6% of pts remained on treatment in the RIB + ET arm and combination CT arm, respectively. The primary endpoint was met, with a statistically significant PFS benefit of ≈1 year for RIB + ET vs combination CT (mPFS, 24.0 vs 12.3 mo; hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.36-0.79; P=.0007). OS data were immature at data cutoff. The mTTF was ≈10 mo longer for RIB + ET vs CT (18.6 vs 8.5 mo; hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.32-0.63). The ORR was similar for RIB + ET vs CT (65.2% vs 60.0%). No new safety signals were observed in pts on RIB. Lower rates of treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs; 1.8% vs 8.0%) and lower rates of discontinuation due to treatment-related AEs (7.1% vs 23.0%) were seen with RIB + ET vs CT, respectively. AEs observed with combination CT were consistent with the published data. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful PFS benefit with RIB + ET over combination CT in the first-line pre/perimenopausal pt population with aggressive HR+/HER2− ABC disease. This is the first study comparing a CDK4/6i + ET vs combination CT and demonstrating the superiority of RIB + ET in aggressive HR+/HER2− ABC. This evidence supports RIB+ ET use as a preferred option for this pt population. Citation Format: Yen-Shen Lu, Eznal Izwadi Bin Mohd Mahidin, Hamdy Azim, Yeşim ERALP, Yoon-Sim Yap, Seock-Ah Im, Julie Rihani, James Bowles, Teresa Delgar Alfaro, Jiwen Wu, Melissa Gao, Khemaies Slimane, Nagi El Saghir. Primary results from the randomized Phase II RIGHT Choice trial of premenopausal patients with aggressive HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer treated with ribociclib + endocrine therapy vs physician’s choice combination chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-10.

Abstract P3-11-09: Extracellular vesicle-based biomarker assay for the monitoring of the efficacy of frontline endocrine therapy + CDK4-6 inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer

Abstract CONTEXT: Endocrine therapy combined with CDK4/6 inhibitor is the standard frontline treatment for the vast majority of HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Despite an overall survival benefit, patients eventually progress and mechanisms of resistance to this combination are not well identified. Non-invasive monitoring of the efficacy of treatment could help into tailoring therapeutic regimen. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are a group of heterogeneous nanosized bioparticles (30-1000nm), released by almost all cell types - including tumor, platelets, and immune cells – carrying informative biological material emanating from the mother cell and circulating in the blood stream. In this project, we ambition to assess whether the vesiclemia, i.e. plasmatic extracellular vesicle concentration can be used as a clinic-biological parameter to assist in the monitoring of patients. METHODS: EPICURE is an ongoing pilot prospective cohort study of heterogeneous and massive data integration, i.e. multi-omics approaches in MBC patients. The present study focused on patients with HR+/HER2- MBC receiving frontline endocrine therapy+iCDK4/6. Plasma samples were drawn every 3 months during the treatment until progression. The workflow for the enrichment of circulating EVs was developed from frozen plasma. A semi-automatized isolation procedure using size exclusion chromatography combined with the newly developed interference light microscopy apparatus Videodrop allowed to routinely separate plasmatic EVs and quantify vesiclemia in a fast and reliable manner for a large number of samples (longitudinal follow-up of MBC patients). RESULTS: 26 patients were included and monitored for vesiclemia. Median age was 58.5y (±13.7). Metastatic disease sites were distributed as follows: bone metastases (21; 84%), liver (21; 84%), thoracic (10; 40%), node (2; 8%), brain (1; 4%), others (2; 8%). Endocrine therapy included aromatase inhibitors (20; 77%), fulvestrant (6; 29%), GnRH agonists (5; 19%) and CDK4/6 inhibitors palbocilib (15; 57%), abemaciclib (8; 31%) and ribociclib (3; 11%). With a median follow-up time of 22.1 months (95%CI 21.2 - not reached), median progression free survival was 21.8 months (95%CI 18.1 - not reached). Median time on treatment was 19.4 months (IQR 11.6 - 22.1). Objective response rate was confirmed in 12 patients (6 with complete response). Out of the 26 patients, 12 stopped the frontline treatment due to disease progression. 135 longitudinal follow-up samples were analyzed for EVs. All patients who progressed rapidly after treatment initiation (i.e median PFS< 6 months) had an increased vesiclemia at the months 2 and 6 after inclusion. Conversely, patients who had a median PFS >18m had a stable vesiclemia during this period. CONCLUSION This study aims to use circulating EVs as a therapeutic companion to anticipate treatment resistance and tumor progression in MBC patients. Our preliminary data suggest that the vesiclemia could be used as a predictive tool to anticipate treatment failure, and thus might be used to tailor treatments in time. Citation Format: Mathilde Richard, Jean Sebastien FRENEL, Laurent Mathiot, Mario Campone, Mathilde Colombie, Marie Robert, Anne Patsouris, Frederic Bigot, Julie Gavard, Gwennan André-Grégoire, Laetitia Guevel. Extracellular vesicle-based biomarker assay for the monitoring of the efficacy of frontline endocrine therapy + CDK4-6 inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-11-09.

Abstract P5-05-04: Estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treated with lasofoxifene or fulvestrant in the ELAINE 1 study

Abstract Introduction: Acquired ESR1 mutations (mutESR1) after long-term endocrine therapy drive treatment resistance, metastasis, and poor prognosis for patients (pts) with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Lasofoxifene (LAS), a selective estrogen receptor modulator, alone or with a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) reduced tumor growth better than fulvestrant (Fulv) in mutESR1 BC xenograft models. ELAINE 1 is a randomized trial of LAS vs Fulv in pts with mutESR1 and prior progression on aromatase inhibitor and CDK4/6i. Preliminary results (ESMO 2022) showed that LAS prolonged median progression-free survival (mPFS) compared with Fulv with a favorable safety profile. Here, we report changes in ESR1 ctDNA mutant allele frequency (MAF) from baseline to 8 wks and their associations with clinical benefit (CB) and mPFS. Methods: ELAINE 1 pts were randomized to oral LAS 5 mg daily or IM Fulv 500 mg on days 1, 15, and 29, then every 4 wks, until disease progression or severe toxicity. ctDNA mutESR1 mutations (baseline and 8 wks) were assessed using the Sysmex Inostics OncoBeam or SafeSeq assays—which detect mutESR1 at low allele fractions. MAF changes from baseline to wk 8 were characterized as decreased (decrease in ESR1 MAF or fully cleared), increased (increase in MAF), or equivocal (polyclonal patients [>1 mutESR1] with some increasing and decreasing MAF trends); correlations with PFS and CB were explored. Efficacy measures included objective response rate (ORR), PFS, and CB at 24 wks (CB defined as response or stable disease ≥24 wks). Results: 103 pts received LAS (n=52) or Fulv (n=51). Most common baseline ESR1 variants detected were D538G (56%), Y537S (39%), Y537N (29%), E380Q (22%); 56 (54%) pts were polyclonal. Of the 61 pts with evaluable baseline and wk 8 ctDNA, LAS decreased mutESR1 MAF in 29/35 pts (83% [11 complete clearance]) while Fulv decreased mutESR1 MAF in 16/26 pts (61.5% [6 complete clearance]) (Table). mPFS with LAS was 8 and 4 mos for pts with decreased/cleared MAF and increased MAF, respectively, and with Fulv was 4.5 and 2.8 mos, respectively (Table). LAS decreased the common mutESR1 variants more frequently than Fulv (median relative change -87.1% vs -14.7%). In pts with decreased MAF, CB was observed in 16/29 LAS pts (55%) and 4/16 Fulv pts (25%). The predictiveness of ESR1 MAF clearance for CB was also explored. Of 11 pts with ESR1 MAF clearance taking LAS, 10 achieved CB, yielding a positive predictive value (PPV) of 90.9%. In contrast, 2/6 pts with ESR1 MAF clearance taking Fulv had CB for a PPV of 33.3%. Sensitivity for predicting CB based on direction of ESR1 MAF change was 94% with LAS and 80% with Fulv. In pts with Y537S MAF (n=33), LAS decreased Y537S in 13/15 (87%), with a median relative MAF decrease of 89%. In marked contrast, Fulv increased Y537S MAF in 11/18 pts (61%), corresponding to an MAF relative increase of 82%. LAS and Fulv resulted in complete clearance of Y537S MAF in 33% and 6% of pts, respectively. Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that LAS more effectively decreased or cleared mutESR1 than Fulv. Further, mutESR1 clearance was associated with prolonged PFS and more CB in LAS but not Fulv pts, suggesting that LAS results in robust mutESR1 target engagement. Taken together, our data suggest mutESR1 as a potential liquid biomarker for predicting response to LAS in mutESR1, endocrine-resistant mBC pts. Table. Change from baseline to week 8 in ESR1 MAF and clinical benefit at 24 weeks. CI, confidence interval; MAF, mutant allele fraction; ND, none detected; PFS, progression-free survival. Citation Format: Matthew P. Goetz, Einav Gal-Yam, Daniel Stover, Sarah L. Sammons, Stephanie L. Graff, Grace Wang, Massimo Cristofanilli, Gary Riordan, Hillary S. Sloane, Dominic Carroll, Paul V. Plourde, David J Portman. Estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treated with lasofoxifene or fulvestrant in the ELAINE 1 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-05-04.

Abstract OT2-01-06: Phase II trial of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy followed by combination of pembrolizumab, palbociclib and endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer

Abstract Background: The combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapy (ET) is standard-of-care for patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Immune modulatory effects of CDK4/6i are well documented preclinically but poorly understood in the clinical setting. Our previous study combining letrozole, palbociclib and pembrolizumab in patients with HR+ MBC (NCT02778685) showed a promising complete response rate of 31%. Dynamic changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) subpopulations indicated that palbociclib may increase CD8+ TEMRA (terminally differentiated effector memory cells) and CD4+ TEM (effector memory cells) and enable immune activation. The current cohort 3 was designed to study the immune modulatory effect of palbociclib as an immune-priming agent with a biomarker enriched design. Methods: Women with ECOG 0-1, HR+ HER2- MBC, RECIST 1.1 measurable disease, no prior therapy for MBC were enrolled. Patients with endocrine therapy, including aromatase inhibitor +/- ovarian suppression or fulvestrant, were eligible. A palbociclib + ET lead-in design was used, starting on day -28 followed by combination therapy with pembrolizumab added on C1D1. Peripheral blood and tumor biopsy at baseline and on-treatment were collected to allow in-depth analysis of biomarkers predicting response to the combination. The primary endpoint was to evaluate if the palbociclib potentiated immune responses as a “priming” agent through PBMC analysis and on treatment tumor biopsy. Secondary endpoints included other immune cell subsets and changes that follow the combination with pembrolizumab. With 25 patients, assuming a standard deviation of 0.51 in the relative change in classic monocytes in PBMCs, there is 90% power to detect a relative change of log(C1D1/baseline) of 34.5% with a type I error (two-sided) of 0.05. Results: Between August 2020 and April 2022, 16 patients were enrolled in cohort 3. Currently 11 patients have adverse event (AEs) and 16 patients have response data. Median age was 57 years (39-72). 8/11 (73%) were non-Hispanic white, 1/11 (9%) Hispanic, 1/11 (9%) Asian, and 1/11 (9%) African American. 87% patients had grade 3 AEs, and 30% had grade 4 AEs. Grade 3 AEs were 9/11 (82%) neutropenia, 5/11 (45%) leukopenia, 1/11 (9%) elevated LFTs, and 1/11 (9%) each lymphopenia, hot flashes, febrile neutropenia, and pneumonitis. Grade 4 AEs were 1/11 (9%) lymphopenia. 8/16 (50%) patients achieved a partial response (PR), 5/16 (31%) had stable disease (SD), and 1/16 (6%) had progression of disease (PD) by RECIST 1.1. Additionally, 2/16 (13%) patients were too early to determine best overall response. Response rate (CR+PR) was 50%. PBMCs and tumor microenvironment profiling are ongoing. Conclusion: The combination of palbociclib, pembrolizumab and ET is well tolerated, and a response rate of 50% was identified in HR+ MBC patients who received this combination as front-line therapy. Dynamic changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumor microenvironment profiling are ongoing. Citation Format: Yuan Yuan, Colt A. Egelston, Weihua Guo, Susan E. Yost, Paul H. Frankel, Christopher Ruel, Mireya Murga, Aileen Tang, Norma Martinez, Daniel Schmolze, Daphne Stewart, James Waisman, Kelly Yap, Joanne Mortimer, Niki Tank. Phase II trial of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy followed by combination of pembrolizumab, palbociclib and endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-01-06.

Evaluating Elacestrant in the Management of ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Evidence to Date.

Breast cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer mortality in women. Endocrine therapy is the backbone treatment for hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer, the most common subtype. Although several endocrine therapy agents are available, essentially all HR-positive metastatic breast cancers will become resistant to these drugs. ESR1 mutations represent an important mechanism of resistance to aromatase inhibitors. Elacestrant is a novel oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) that selectively binds to the estrogen receptor in breast cancer cells, inhibiting tumor growth. Preclinical data suggested greater efficacy of elacestrant in combination with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) or everolimus. In a Phase III clinical trial, elacestrant demonstrated a significant although modest improvement in median progression-free survival (PFS) compared to standard of care endocrine therapy in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Importantly, there was also a significant benefit in patients with ESR1 mutations, which led to the FDA approval of elacestrant in this patient group. Elacestrant was generally well tolerated, with main side effects being upper gastrointestinal symptoms. There are several ongoing clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of elacestrant in the early setting as well as in combination with other targeted agents in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Other novel oral SERDs are also currently being evaluated in the treatment of HR-positive breast cancer. Results of ongoing clinical trials with these drugs will help clinicians decide the best sequence and combination of endocrine therapy agents.

Abstract P4-07-47: Real-world practice patterns in the management of metastatic breast cancer in Washington State

Abstract Background: Evidence-based recommendations for the management of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) endorse confirmation of recurrence with biopsy and reassessment of biomarker status. National guidelines support numerous treatment options and do not capture the nuances of real-world practice. Real world data may demonstrate disparities in adherence to guidelines. Methods: We collaborated with Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research (HICOR) to link enrollment and insurance claims records with Washington State cancer registries from 2008-2017. Our cohort comprised of women > 18 years old with MBC who met enrollment criteria in one of four payors (Premara, Regence, Medicare, or Medicaid). We identified receipt of biopsy and biomarker re-assessment at time of recurrence, receipt of first line treatment, categorized as CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDKi), chemotherapy (CT), or hormone therapy (HT) and examined factors influencing these practice patterns. Results: We identified 1,101 patients with MBC (recurrent MBC, N = 715; de novo MBC, N = 386) with a median age of 66 (range 54 – 74). Of the patients with MBC, there were a total of 677 patients with ER+/HER2- MBC. Table 1 shows demographic data. Most of the cohort were White (89%). Approximately 15% of patients lived in areas of high deprivation (area of deprivation index, ADI, 8-10). Patients had either Commercial (47%), Medicaid (4%), Medicare (35%) or multiple (13%) insurance. Of the patients with recurrent MBC, 49.5% received a biopsy to confirm metastatic diagnosis. Similarly, 48.7% of recurrent MBC patients underwent biomarker reassessment. Patients with highest co-morbidity index (2) were more likely to undergo biopsy confirmation (20.3% vs 13.0%, p = 0.02). Biopsy was more often performed at recurrence in patients receiving care at a high-volume center (74.3% vs 67.6%, p = 0.03) compared to low volume center (18.6% vs 26.6%, p = 0.03). First line treatment selection was directly associated with receipt of biopsy and biomarker testing. Hormone therapy only was more common in patients who did not undergo biopsy (62.3% vs 37.7%, p < 0.001) or biomarker reassessment (62.7% vs 37.3%, p < 0.001). Of the patients with ER+/HER2- MBC, the majority of patients received ET alone (69%), followed by chemotherapy (22%), and CDK4/6i + ET (9%). Dual agent CT was the more commonly prescribed compared to single agent in those who received CT (56% vs 44%). The majority of patients who received CDKi + ET were < 65 years old (65.2%, p < 0.02). Insurance influenced first line therapy selection and patients with commercial insurance were more likely to receive CDK4/6i + ET compared to those with Medicare/Medicaid. (60.9% vs 26.1%, p = 0.10). Patients with de novo MBC were more likely to receive CT (43.1% vs 13.4%, p < 0.001) and less likely to receive ET alone (47.9% vs 78.0%, p < 0.001). Almost all patients treated with CDK4/6i + ET received care a high-volume center (91.3%, p = 0.11). Conclusion:Our findings highlight key gaps for future investigations in the management of MBC and serve as a launching point for new patient-centered and quality-promoting research initiatives. Table 1: Baseline Demographics 1# of patients treated annually, high = >100, medium 25-100, low <25. Citation Format: Poorni Manohar, Hannah Linden, Veena Shankaran, Catherine Fedorenko, Jenna Voutsinas, Qin Sun, Vicky Wu. Real-world practice patterns in the management of metastatic breast cancer in Washington State [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-47.

The effect and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined endocrine therapy on HR+, HER2-breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cyclin-dependent kinase4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) on hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC). A search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases before July 2022. A total of 19 studies comprising 19,004 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. This meta-analysis found that for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic HR+, HER2- BC, CDK4/6i combined with ET can significantly improve the progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio = 0.59, p < 0.001), overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio = 0.77, p < 0.001), objective response rate (ORR) [risk ratio (RR) = 1.32, p = 0.001)], disease control rate (DCR) (RR = 1.10, p < 0.001), and clinical benefit response (CBR) (RR = 1.15, p = 0.001). For early HR+, HER2- BC, CDK4/6i combined with ET improved ORR (RR = 1.14, p = 0.05) and invasive disease free survival (iDFS) (hazard ratio = 0.87, p = 0.045) but had no effect on pathologic complete response (pCR) (RR = 1.75, p = 0.33), distant recurrence free survival (DRFS) (hazard ratio = 0.83, p = 0.311), and OS (hazard ratio = 1.08, p = 0.705). CDK4/6i combined with ET can improve the prognosis of patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic HR+, HER2- BC, but it has no obvious effect on patients with early HR+, HER2- BC. It is generally safe and manageable.

CDK4/6 Inhibitors Overcome Endocrine ESR1 Mutation-Related Resistance in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

ESR1 mutations contribute to endocrine resistance and occur in a high percentage of hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) cases. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) changed the treatment landscape of HR+ mBC, as they are able to overcome estrogen resistance. The present retrospective study investigates the clinical benefit of CDK4/6i in ESR1 mutant HR+ mBC patients treated with a CDK4/6i as first- or second-line therapy. Plasma was collected at baseline prior to CDK4/6i plus hormone therapy as a first- or second-line treatment. Circulating free DNA (cfDNA) was extracted from plasma, and ESR1 mutation analysis was performed on a ddPCR. Statistical analyses were performed to investigate the predictive power of ESR1 mutations and any association with clinical factors. A total of 42 patients with mBC treated with CDK4/6i plus endocrine therapy as first- (n = 35) or second-line (n = 7) were enrolled. Twenty-eight patients received hormonal therapy (AI or tamoxifen) in the adjuvant setting. ESR1 mutation status in blood was associated with shorter median disease-free survival (DFS) (30 vs. 110 months; p = 0.006). Multivariate analysis confirmed ESR1 mutations as independent factors of resistance in adjuvant hormone therapy. On the contrary, no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in the presence or absence of an ESR1 mutation in patients treated with CDK4/6i as first-line treatment (p = 0.29). No statistically significant correlation between the best response to CDK4/6i and ESR1 mutation was found (p = 0.46). This study indicates that the ESR1 mutation detected in cfDNA is an independent predictive factor of clinical recurrence in the adjuvant setting and that CDK4/6i can overcome ESR1-dependent resistance.

Genomic Complexity Predicts Resistance to Endocrine Therapy and CDK4/6 Inhibition in Hormone Receptor-Positive (HR+)/HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Clinical biomarkers to identify patients unlikely to benefit from CDK4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) are lacking. We implemented a comprehensive circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis to identify genomic features for predicting and monitoring treatment resistance. ctDNA was isolated from 216 plasma samples collected from 51 patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) on a phase II trial of palbociclib combined with letrozole or fulvestrant (NCT03007979). Boosted whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed at baseline and clinical progression to evaluate genomic alterations, mutational signatures, and blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB). Low-pass whole-genome sequencing was performed at baseline and serial timepoints to assess blood copy-number burden (bCNB). High bTMB and bCNB were associated with lack of clinical benefit and significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) compared with patients with low bTMB or low bCNB (all P < 0.05). Dominant APOBEC signatures were detected at baseline exclusively in cases with high bTMB (5/13, 38.5%) versus low bTMB (0/37, 0%; P = 0.0006). Alterations in ESR1 were enriched in samples with high bTMB (P = 0.0005). There was a high correlation between bTMB determined by WES and bTMB determined using a 600-gene panel (R = 0.98). During serial monitoring, an increase in bCNB score preceded radiographic progression in 12 of 18 (66.7%) patients. Genomic complexity detected by noninvasive profiling of bTMB and bCNB predicted poor outcomes in patients treated with ET and CDK4/6i and identified early disease progression before imaging. Novel treatment strategies including immunotherapy-based combinations should be investigated in this population.

Adherence to the CDK 4/6 Inhibitor Palbociclib and Omission of Dose Management Supported by Pharmacometric Modelling as Part of the OpTAT Study.

The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) palbociclib is administered orally and cyclically, causing medication adherence challenges. We evaluated components of adherence to palbociclib, its relationship with pharmacokinetics (PK), and drug-induced neutropenia. Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receiving palbociclib, delivered in electronic monitors (EM), were randomized 1:1 to an intervention and a control group. The intervention was a 12-month interprofessional medication adherence program (IMAP) along with monthly motivational interviews by a pharmacist. Implementation adherence was compared between groups using generalized estimating equation models, in which covariates were included. Model-based palbociclib PK and neutrophil profiles were simulated under real-life implementation scenarios: (1) optimal, (2) 2 doses omitted and caught up at cycle end. At 6 months, implementation was slightly higher and more stable in the intervention (n = 19) than in the control (n = 19) group, 99.2% and 97.3% (Δ1.95%, 95% CI 1.1−2.9%), respectively. The impact of the intervention was larger in patients diagnosed with MBC for >2 years (Δ3.6%, 95% CI 2.1−5.4%), patients who received >4 cycles before inclusion (Δ3.1%, 95% CI 1.7−4.8%) and patients >65 (Δ2.3%, 95% CI 0.8−3.6%). Simulations showed that 25% of patients had neutropenia grade ≥3 during the next cycle in scenario 1 versus 30% in scenario 2. Education and monitoring of patient CDK4/6i cycle management and adherence along with therapeutic drug monitoring can help clinicians improve prescription and decrease toxicity.

Peripheral blood lymphocytes predict clinical outcomes in hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with Endocrine Therapy (ET) are the standard treatment for patients with Hormone Receptor-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (HR+/HER2- aBC). While CDK4/6i are known to reduce several peripheral blood cells, such as neutrophils, lymphocytes and platelets, the impact of these modulations on clinical outcomes is unknown. A multicenter, retrospective-prospective Italian study. We investigated the association between baseline peripheral blood cells, or their early modifications (i.e. 2 weeks after treatment initiation), and the progression-free survival (PFS) of HR+/HER2- aBC patients treated with ETs plus CDK4/6i. Random Forest models were used to select covariates associated with patient PFS among a large list of patient- and tumor-related variables. We evaluated 638 HR+/HER2- aBC patients treated with ET plus CDK4/6i at six Italian Institutions between January 2017 and May 2021. High baseline lymphocyte counts were independently associated with longer PFS [median PFS (mPFS) 20.1 versus 13.2 months in high versus low lymphocyte patients, respectively; adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR): 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.92; p = 0.0144]. Moreover, patients experiencing a lower early reduction of lymphocyte counts had significantly longer PFS when compared to patients undergoing higher lymphocyte decrease (mPFS 18.1 versus 14.5 months; aHR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.73-0.93; p = 0.0037). Patients with high baseline lymphocytes and undergoing a lower reduction, or even an increase, of lymphocyte counts during CDK4/6i therapy experienced the longest PFS, while patients with lower baseline lymphocytes and undergoing a higher decrease of lymphocytes had the lowest PFS (mPFS 21.4 versus 11 months, respectively). Baseline and on-treatment modifications of peripheral blood lymphocytes have independent prognostic value in HR+/HER2- aBC patients. This study supports the implementation of clinical strategies to boost antitumor immunity in patients with HR+/HER2- aBC treated with ETs plus CDK4/6i.

Quality of life with ribociclib versus abemaciclib as first-line treatment of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison.

A cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) + endocrine therapy is recommended as first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Quality of life (QoL) is an important endpoint that affects treatment decisions. Understanding the relevance of CDK4/6i treatment on QoL is gaining importance given use in earlier treatment lines for ABC and an emerging role in treating early breast cancer in which QoL may be more impactful. In the absence of head-to-head trial data, a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) permits comparative efficacy between trials. In this analysis, patient-reported QoL for MONALEESA-2 [ribociclib + aromatase inhibitor (AI)] and MONARCH 3 (abemaciclib + AI) was compared using MAIC with a focus on individual domains. An anchored MAIC of QoL comparing ribociclib + AI versus abemaciclib + AI was performed using data from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 and BR-23 questionnaires. Individual patient data from MONALEESA-2 and published aggregated data from MONARCH 3 were included in this analysis. Time to sustained deterioration (TTSD) was calculated as the time from randomization to a ⩾10-point deterioration with no later improvement above this threshold. Patients from the ribociclib (n = 205) and placebo (n = 149) arms of MONALEESA-2 were matched with patients from the abemaciclib (n = 328) and placebo (n = 165) arms of MONARCH 3. After weighting, baseline patient characteristics were well balanced. TTSD significantly favored ribociclib versus abemaciclib in appetite loss [hazard ratio (HR), 0.46; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.27-0.81], diarrhea (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.79), fatigue (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.96), and arm symptoms (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30-0.79). TTSD did not significantly favor abemaciclib compared with ribociclib in any functional or symptom scale of the QLQ-C30 or BR-23 questionnaires. This MAIC indicates that ribociclib + AI is associated with better symptom-related QoL than abemaciclib + AI for postmenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- ABC treated in the first-line setting. NCT01958021 (MONALEESA-2) and NCT02246621 (MONARCH 3).

Prognostic Parameters of Palbociclib in HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review.

Recent studies have demonstrated that the combination of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitor (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapy (ET) is more effective than ET alone and significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC). Palbociclib is the first CDK4/6i approved for use, and its clinical advantages have been shown. However, 30% of patients will continue to develop secondary drug resistance. Therefore, exploring the parameters that can predict the efficacy of Palbociclib and developing a clinical prediction model is essential for evaluating the prognosis of patients.

Racial disparities in overall survival after the introduction of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy have improved HR + /HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) outcomes. However, it is still unclear whether the response to CDK4/6i is similar for all races. Therefore, we aimed to assess overall survival (OS) trends stratified by race in patients with HR + /HER2- MBC after the approval of CDK4/6i, as part of the standard of care, in 2015. We performed a population-based study using the SEER database. Patients with HR + /HER2- MBC were divided into two time-based cohorts: 1) pre-CDK4/6i era (diagnosed in 2011-2013) and 2) post-CDK4/6i era (diagnosed in 2015-2017). We used propensity score matching and identified 2,684 patients in each cohort that matched in several characteristics. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate 2-year OS. Association between cohort and OS was evaluated using marginal Cox proportional hazards models with robust sandwich variance estimator. We conducted competing risk analysis to estimate the risk of breast cancer death in both cohorts. The 2-year OS rate was 65% for the post-CDK4/6i era and 62% for the pre-CDK4/6i era (stratified log-rank p = 0.025). The 2-year OS for non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients improved in the post-CDK4/6i era compared to the pre-CDK4/6i era (67% vs. 63%, p = 0.033). However, OS did not improve for non-Hispanic Black (NHB) (54% vs. 54%, p = 0.876) or Hispanic (67% vs. 65%, p = 0.617) groups. The risk of breast cancer death decreased in the post-CDK4/6i era as compared to the pre-CDK4/6i era (2-year risk of breast cancer death: 33% vs. 30%, p = 0.015); however, this effect was observed only in NHW (sHR 0.84, p = 0.005) women, but not in NHB (sHR 0.94, p = 0.630) or Hispanic (sHR 0.91, p = 0.550) women. Our study confirms that outcomes for HR + /HER2- MBC have improved after CDK4/6i were introduced in 2015. However, this effect is primarily driven by the improved OS in NHW patients, without significant improvement in OS in NHB or Hispanics.

Effect of prior treatments on post-CDK 4/6 inhibitor survival in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

PurposeMultiple treatment options exist for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, limited information is available on the impact of prior treatment duration and class on survival outcome for novel therapies, such as cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) for patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+ HER2−) MBC.MethodsThis study used a nationwide, de-identified electronic health record-derived database to identify women with HR+ HER2− MBC who received at least one CDK 4/6i between 2011 and 2020. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for the association between prior duration and class of cancer treatment (both early-stage and metastatic) and prior CDK 4/6i survival as well as for those with multiple CDK 4/6i.ResultsOf 5363 patients, the median survival from first CDK 4/6 inhibitor administration was 3.3 years. When compared to patients with no prior treatments, patients with < 1 year of prior treatment duration had a 30% increased hazard of death (HR, 1.30; 95% CI 1.15–1.46), those with 1 to < 3 years a 68% increased hazard of death (HR 1.68; 95% CI 1.49–1.88), and those with 3 or more years a 55% increased hazard of death (HR 1.55; 95% CI 1.36, 1.76). Patients who received prior therapy (endocrine or chemotherapy) before their CDK 4/6i had worse outcomes than those who received no prior therapy. Similar results were seen when comparing patients in the metastatic setting alone. Finally, patients who received a different CDK 4/6i after their first saw a lower hazard of death compared to patients who received subsequent endocrine or chemotherapy after their first CDK 4/6i.ConclusionPrior treatment duration and class are associated with a decreased overall survival after CDK 4/6 inhibitor administration. This highlights the importance for clinicians to consider prior treatment and duration in treatment decision-making and for trialists to stratify by these factors when randomizing patients or reporting results of future studies.

Clinical Implications and Treatment Strategies for ESR1 Fusions in Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Case Series.

In hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (HR+ MBC), endocrine resistance is commonly due to genetic alterations of ESR1, the gene encoding estrogen receptor alpha (ERα). While ESR1 point mutations (ESR1-MUT) cause acquired resistance to aromatase inhibition (AI) through constitutive activation, far less is known about the molecular functions and clinical consequences of ESR1 fusions (ESR1-FUS). This case series discusses 4 patients with HR+ MBC with ESR1-FUS in the context of the existing ESR1-FUS literature. We consider therapeutic strategies and raise the hypothesis that CDK4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i) may be effective against ESR1-FUS with functional ligand-binding domain swaps. These cases highlight the importance of screening for ESR1-FUS in patients with HR+ MBC while continuing investigation of precision treatments for these genomic rearrangements.

CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Advanced HR+/HER2 – Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Real-World Data Analysis

Purpose: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy are considered standard-of-care for first-line therapy of patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative, advanced breast cancer (HR+/HER2- ABC). Superiority of combination therapy over endocrine monotherapy has been demonstrated in a multitude of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in phase III and IV. However, RCTs reflect clinical reality only to a limited extent, as narrow inclusion criteria lead to a selected patient collective. Here, we present real-world data (RWD) on CDK4/6i treatment in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC at four certified German university breast cancer centers. Methods: Patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2- ABC who were treated in clinical routine with CDK4/6i between November 2016 and December 2020 at four certified German university breast cancer centers (Saarland University Medical Center, University Medical Center Charité Berlin, University Medical Center Bonn, and University Medical Center Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel) were identified and enrolled in this retrospective study. Clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes were recorded with particular emphasis on CDK4/6i therapy course [progression-free survival (PFS) following treatment initiation, toxicity, dose reduction, therapy discontinuation, prior and subsequent therapy line]. Results: Data from n = 448 patients were evaluated. The mean patient age was 63 (±12) years. Of these patients, n = 165 (36.8%) were primarily metastasized, and n = 283 (63.2%) had secondary metastatic disease. N = 319 patients (71.3%) received palbociclib, n = 114 patients (25.4%) received ribociclib, and n = 15 patients (3.3%) received abemaciclib, respectively. Dose reduction was performed in n = 132 cases (29.5%). N = 57 patients (12.7%) discontinued the treatment with CDK4/6i due to side effects. N = 196 patients (43.8%) experienced disease progression under CDK4/6i treatment. The median PFS was 17 months. Presence of hepatic metastases and prior therapy lines were associated with shorter PFS, whereas estrogen positivity and dose reduction due to toxicity were positively associated with PFS. Presence of bone and lung metastases, progesterone positivity, Ki67 index, grading, BRCA1/2 and PIK3CA mutation status, adjuvant endocrine resistance, and age did not significantly impact on PFS. Conclusion: Our RWD analysis on CDK4/6i treatment in Germany supports data from RCTs regarding both treatment efficacy and safety of CDK4/6i for treatment of patients with HR+/HER2- ABC. In comparison to data from the pivotal RCTs, median PFS was lower but within the expected range for RWD, which could result from inclusion of patients with more advanced diseases (i.e., higher therapy lines) to our dataset.

APOBEC Mutational Signatures in Hormone Receptor-Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancers Are Associated With Poor Outcomes on CDK4/6 Inhibitors and Endocrine Therapy.

APOBEC mutagenesis underlies somatic evolution and accounts for tumor heterogeneity in several cancers, including breast cancer (BC). In this study, we evaluated the characteristics of a real-world cohort for time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival on CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) plus endocrine therapy (ET) and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Comprehensive genomic profiling results from 29,833 BC samples were analyzed for tumor mutational burden and APOBEC signatures. For clinical outcomes, a deidentified nationwide (United States-based) BC Clinico-Genomic Database (CGDB) was evaluated with log-rank and Cox models. Patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) BC who received first-line ET and CDK4/6i were included. Eligible patients from Mayo Clinic and Duke University were HR+ HER2- BC with sequencing data between September 2013 and July 2020. Of 29,833 samples sequenced, 7.9% were APOBEC+ with a high rate in invasive lobular carcinoma (16.7%) and in metastatic tumors (9.7%) relative to locally biopsied BC (4.3%; P < .001). In CGDB, 857 patients with HR+ HER2- BC received ET plus CDK4/6i in the first line. APOBEC+ patients had significantly shorter TTD on ET plus CDK4/6i than APOBEC- patients, 7.8 (95% CI, 4.3 to 14.6) versus 12.4 months (95% CI, 11.2 to 14.1; hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.39; P = .0036). Clinical benefit to immune checkpoint inhibitors was observed in HR+ HER2-, APOBEC+, tumor mutational burden-high patients, with four of nine CGDB patients (TTD 0.3-11.3 months) and four of six patients in Duke/Mayo cohorts (TTD 0.9-40.5 months) with a TTD of ≥ 3 months. APOBEC+ HR+ HER2- patients had shorter TTD on first-line ET plus CDK4/6i relative to APOBEC- patients. Further research is needed to optimize the treatment of APOBEC+ HR+ HER2- BC and to investigate the efficacy of immunotherapeutic strategies in this population.

RWD9 Real-World Relative Dose Intensity in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated With Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Sweden

Evaluate real-world relative dose intensity (RDI) and drug holiday RDI in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) (ribociclib, palbociclib or abemaciclib).

200 (PB-113) Poster - Systemic therapies post progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with oestrogen receptor positive metastatic breast cancer: Real world data from Guy’s Cancer Centre

Background: There is no prospective data to guide treatment strategies after progression on cyclin dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer. Here we present a single-institution experience to assess prescribing patterns and outcomes with subsequent therapies post CDK4/6i progression.