To focus on the imaging features of liposclerosing myxofibrous tumor (LSMFT) and diagnostic challenges to enhance clinical recognition and differential diagnosis accuracy. Retrospective analysis was conducted on the imaging and pathological data from 21 cases diagnosed with LSMFT between January 2014 and November 2022, including 14 males and 7 females (aged from 21 to 73 years; the course of disease ranged from 4 to 48 months). Patient demographics, clinical presentations, and imaging modalities including X-ray, CT, and MRI were reviewed. Pathological findings were correlated with imaging features to delineate diagnostic criteria and identify causes of misdiagnosis. All 21 patients represented primary lesions, located in 14 bilateral femurs [9 on the right and 5 on the left; 12 proximal femurs (intertrochanteric and peripheral) and 2 distal femurs], 2 proximal tibia, 2 proximal humerus, 1 proximal radius, and 1 ilium and 1 calcaneus. On X-ray and CT, all lesions showed cartographical or quasi-circular osteolytic destruction with distinct and sclerotic margins, continuous bone cortex, absence of periosteal reaction and surrounding soft tissue mass. Calcification, bone ridge and varying degrees of fat components were observed in 16 lesions, displaying mixed density;5 lesions showed ground-glass density with minimal bone ridge. On MRI, the signal intensity of the lesion was heterogeneous. T1-weighted imaging showed iso-to slightly high signal intensity, while T2-weighted imaging demonstrated unevenly high signal intensity. Fat-suppressed sequences depicted significantly elevated signal intensity within lesions, with post-contrast enhancement showing uneven patterns. 5 Cases were initially misdiagnosed as fibrous dysplasia. LSMFT is an uncommon benign bone tumor, typically localized in the proximal femur but occasionally found in other skeletal sites. Understanding its distinct imaging characteristics is crucial for accurate diagnosis. Typical cases exhibit identifiable imaging patterns, whereas atypical presentations may lead to misdiagnosis as fibrous dysplasia.
Read full abstract