Causes Of Medication Errors Research Articles

Causes of errors in the work of the anesthetist nurse and possible ways to eliminate them

The article contains the results of a survey of 32 anesthetist nurses of GBUZ “GKB №1 named after N.I. Pirogov DZM,” which made it possible to identify the main causes of medical errors and propose ways to minimize them. The list of typical mistakes of nurses of the anesthesiology and resuscitation department developed by the author can be used to identify risk groups for making mistakes and preventive work with them.

An Overview of Nurses' Teamwork Perceptions at RS in 2024

Background: Ineffective teamwork and communication in healthcare has been identified as a major cause of medical errors that harm both patients and providers. Teamwork is the focus of attention in healthcare as the success and failure of the system largely depends on team performance. Objectives: This study aims to determine the picture of nurses' teamwork perceptions at RS in 2024. Methods: This study is a quantitative study with a cross-sectional design conducted in May-June 2024 at one of the hospitals in Padang, Indonesia. The population in this study were all nurses working in the inpatient room of RS with a sample size of 48 nurses selected through purposive sampling technique. Data were collected using a questionnaire consisting of socio-demographic instruments and teamwork perception instruments adopted from AHRQ 2020. Data were analyzed using computerized software. Results: The socio-demographic frequency distribution of respondents showed that most nurses were aged 17-35 years (62.5%), female (91.7%), had a Diploma of Nursing education (54.1%), and a working period between 1-14 years (79.1%). The perception of teamwork of nurses at RS is generally in the good enough category with a mean perception of teamwork of 128.00 (SD 35.39). The communication dimension obtained the highest score with a mean of 26.17 (SD 19.93) followed by the dimensions of team structure, leadership, situation monitoring, and mutual support. Conclusion: The perception of nurses' teamwork at RS in 2024 was in the good enough category with the communication dimension getting the highest score. Socio-demographic factors such as age, gender, education, and tenure influence perceptions of teamwork where nurses who are more experienced and have higher education tend to have more positive perceptions of teamwork.

The significance of personalized medicine in healthcare services of the 21st century: a brief literature review

In modern healthcare services, patient safety is a primary goal. With technological advancements, the complexity of healthcare services increases, which in turn creates increased pressure on health professionals during decision-making processes and can lead to errors worldwide. Communication gaps, human factors, patient-originated issues, technical failures, and inadequate policies have been identified as the main causes of medical errors. While research shows that errors stem from human nature and are inevitable, it is emphasized that it is possible to develop methods that enhance patient safety. Utilizing digital technologies to improve the quality and efficiency of healthcare services is a crucial strategy. Innovations such as wearable technologies, mobile devices, digital media-delivered education and consulting services, telehealth applications, 3D printers, clinical decision support systems, and implantable biosensors encompass advancements in the digital health field. This research aims to analyze the complex and dynamic structure of healthcare services in the 21st century, especially considering the opportunities presented by the integration of artificial intelligence and genomic data, within the scope of the relevant literature.

Improving communication among nursing staff at a children's hospital in the southern United States: a best practice implementation project.

Ineffective communication between health care professionals is one of the leading causes of medical errors and can result in adverse events and patient harm. Improving the effectiveness of communication in health care is a worldwide necessity. The aim of this project was to promote evidence-based practices regarding general communication principles among the nursing staff in one unit of a children's hospital in the southern United States. The project used JBI's Evidence Implementation Framework, together with two JBI audit tools (Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System and Getting Research into Practice). A baseline audit was conducted, followed by the implementation of targeted strategies. The project was completed with a follow-up audit to determine changes in practice. Baseline data revealed 61% adherence with four audit criteria for effective communication in health care. Barriers included a lack of education of nursing staff regarding communication skills and less than optimal use of a structured communication tool. Targeted strategies to address the barriers included providing an educational module on communication to nursing staff and moving the structured communication tool to a more convenient location to increase its use. The post-implementation data revealed 81% adherence with the four audit criteria, a 20% increase from baseline results. Optimizing communication and monitoring the use of a structured communication tool has the potential to decrease the risk of medical errors among health care providers. http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A217.

Patient Handoff Practices at the Epilepsy Centers in the United States: A Survey of the Medical Directors.

Communication failure is one of the most significant causes of medical errors. Providing care to patients with seizures at comprehensive epilepsy centers requires uninterrupted coverage and a multidisciplinary approach. However, handoff practices in these settings have not been comprehensively assessed, and recommendations for their standardization are currently lacking. The aim of this observational study was to define the scope of existing practices for patient handoffs across epilepsy centers in the United States and provide relevant recommendations. A 79-question survey was developed to establish the patterns of transition of care for patients undergoing continuous EEG recording, including the periodicity of handoffs and specifics of the relevant workflow. With permission from the National Association of Epilepsy Centers (NAEC), the survey was distributed to the medical directors of all Level 3 and 4 NAEC-accredited epilepsy centers in the United States. The responses were obtained from 70 institutions yielding a survey response rate of 26%. Of these, more than 77% had established weekly handoff processes for both the epilepsy monitoring unit and continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring services. However, only 53% and 43% of centers had procedures for daily service transfers for the patients admitted to the epilepsy monitoring unit or the patients undergoing cEEG, respectively. The patterns of handoffs were complex and utilized group handoffs in < 50% of institutions. In most centers (>70%), patient data transmitted through handoffs included history, clinical information, and EEG findings. However, templates were not applied to standardize this information. All participants agreed or strongly agreed that a culture of patient safety was maintained in their place of practice; however, 12% of participants felt that insufficient time was allowed to discuss these patients or carry out the handoffs without interruptions. Existing handoff practices are not uniform or fully established across epilepsy centers in the United States. This study recommends that guidelines for formal handoff procedures be developed and introduced as a quality metric for all NAEC-accredited epilepsy centers.

Using structured communication to improve patient handoffs and reduce medical errors.

Communication errors during transfer of care from one clinician to another are a major cause of medical errors. In 2006, The Joint Commission made handoff communications a national patient safety goal. In 2014, the Association of American Medical Colleges included giving and receiving a report to transfer a patient's care as one of the 13 core entrustable professional activities required for entry into residency programs. Communication is the key to successful transfer of patient care from one clinician to another during shift change. A structured method of communication used by all clinicians in high-stakes healthcare settings can ensure all vital information about a patient is given to the receiving clinician.

Medication reconciliation by pharmacists for pre-admission patients improves patient safety

BackgroundMedication errors related to the pre-admission medication history obtained on admission are a major cause of medication error during hospitalization. Medication reconciliation (MR) improves patient safety through the detection of inadvertent medication discrepancies at transitions of care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of MR by pharmacists for patients prior to hospital admission on the incidence of medication errors in the early post-admission period.Patients and methodsPatients admitted to the orthopedic ward for surgery between April 2012 and March 2020 were included. Pharmacist-led MR for pre-admission patients was started on April 1, 2017. The incidence of medication errors related to pre-admission medications that occurred during hospitalization were compared between the pre- and post-initiation of pharmacist-led MR (pre-initiation: April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2015, post-initiation: April 1, 2017 to March 31, 2020).ResultIn the post-initiation group, 94.2% (1245/1321) of patients who were taking medications on admission had a pharmacist-led MR before admission. The proportion of patients whose physicians ordered the prescription of their pre-admission medications at the time before hospitalization to continue from admission was significantly higher in the post-initiation group than in the pre-initiation group (47.4% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.001). The incidence of medication errors related to pre-admission medications during hospitalization was significantly lower in the post-initiation group than in the pre-initiation group (1.83% vs. 0.85%, p = 0.025). Pharmacist-led MR prior to admission was a significant protective factor against incidents related to pre-admission medication (odds ratio (OR), 0.3810; 95% confidence interval (CI); 0.156–0.9320, p = 0.035).ConclusionPharmacist-led MR for patients prior to hospital admission led to a reduction in medication errors related to pre-admission medications during hospitalization. Patient safety during hospitalization can be improved by accurate medication histories provided early by pharmacists.

Examining Barriers and Perceptions in Reporting Medication Administration Errors among Nurses at the Tertiary Care Hospitals in Peshawar Pakistan

Medication administration is vital for patient safety, yet medication errors can lead to life-threatening situations and increased mortality rates. Nurses, being essential members of the healthcare team, are constantly present with patients and regularly tasked with drug administration, facing a significant burden of medication errors compared to other healthcare providers. Objectives: To explore the barriers and perceptions of nurses' regarding medication errors reporting in public sector tertiary care hospitals. Methods: A convenient sample of 209 staff nurses participated in this cross-sectional survey from June to October 2022. A three-part questionnaire was used to gather information on the general characteristics of nurses, the causes of medication errors, and the justifications for not reporting them. Results: The Pharmacy supplies inappropriate doses to this unit with a mean of (2.53 ± 1.28) and an insufficient number of staff nurses in each working shift (4.23 ± 0.76) were the two least and most significant contributing factors to medication errors. Additionally, the two most and least significant factors for not reporting medication errors were that nurses may be held accountable if the patient suffered harm (3.94 ± 1.16) and that nurses did not agree with the hospital's definition of a medication error (2.33 ± 1.26) on average. Conclusions: The main causes of drug mistakes and failure to reveal them were nursing and management issues. Moreover, attempt to establish a blame-free culture to motivate reporting errors.

Knowledge and Perception Regarding Medication Error Among Nurses.

Patient safety is the major concern in providing quality care. Medication errors have been identified as the most common type of preventable errors. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and perception regarding medication error among nurses. A quantitative cross-sectional research design was used. The study was conducted in four different private hospitals in Lalitpur. A total enumerative sampling technique was used to select 302 nurses from these hospitals. Descriptive statistical methods were used to assess socio-demographic variables and inferential statistics methods such as the chi-squared test was used to analyse the association between knowledge, perception, and its socio-demographic characteristics. Most of the respondents 244 (80.8%) agreed the cause of medication error occurs due to unclear handwriting and 217 (71.9%) agreed prescribing the wrong route or dose and time. Mostly respondents 126 (41.7%) had inadequate knowledge, 101 (33.4%) had adequate knowledge and 75 (24.8%) had moderate knowledge on medication error. Mostly respondents 273 (90.4%) had positive perception and 26 (8.6 %) had negative perception. Most of the nurses had inadequate knowledge but has positive perception on medication error. Appropriate strategies for reducing nurses' workload, barriers to reporting, and sensitization workshops in a regular basis by the administrator should be developed to address medication errors and enhance patient safety in hospital settings.

Exploring sleep duration and clinical reasoning process in resident physicians: a thematic analysis.

Connecting resident physician work hours and sleep deprivation to adverse outcomes has been difficult. Our study explores clinical reasoning rather than outcomes. Diagnostic errors are a leading cause of medical error and may result from deficits in clinical reasoning. We used simulated cases to explore relationships between sleep duration and diagnostic reasoning. Residents were recruited for a 2-month study (inpatient/outpatient). Each participant's sleep was tracked (sleep diary/actigraphy). At the end of each month, residents watched 2 brief simulated clinical encounters and performed "think alouds" of their clinical reasoning. In each session, 1 video was straightforward and the other video contained distracting contextual factors. Sessions were recorded, transcribed, and interpreted. We conducted a thematic analysis using a constant comparative approach. Themes were compared based on sleep duration and contextual factors. Residents (n = 17) slept more during outpatient compared with inpatient months (450.5 ± 7.13 vs 425.6 ± 10.78 hours, P = .02). We found the following diagnostic reasoning themes: uncertainty, disorganized knowledge, error, semantic incompetence, emotional content, and organized knowledge. Themes reflecting suboptimal clinical reasoning (disorganized knowledge, error, semantic incompetence, uncertainty) were observed more in cases with contextual factors (distractors). "Think alouds" from cases with contextual factors following sleep restriction had a greater number of themes concerning for problematic diagnostic reasoning. Residents obtained significantly more sleep during outpatient compared with inpatient months. Several negative clinical reasoning themes emerged with less sleep combined with cases containing contextual distractors. Our findings reinforce the importance of adequate sleep and supervision in house officers, particularly in cases with distracting elements. Collen J, Durning S, Berk J, Mang J, Alcover K, Jung E. Exploring sleep duration and clinical reasoning process in resident physicians: a thematic analysis. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(8):1279-1289.

Prevalence of medication errors and its related factors in Iranian nurses: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundNurses may make medication errors during the implementation of therapeutic interventions, which initially threaten the patient’s health and safety and prolong their hospital stay. These errors have always been a challenge for healthcare systems. Given that factors such as the timing, type, and causes of medication errors can serve as suitable predictors for their occurrence, we have decided to conduct a review study aiming to investigate the prevalence of medication errors and the associated factors among Iranian nurses.MethodsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, studies were searched on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, IranMedex, Magiran, and SID databases using a combination of keywords and Boolean functions. The study that reported the prevalence of medication errors among nurses in Iran without time limitation up to May 2023 was included in this study.ResultsA total of 36 studies were included in the analysis. The analysis indicates that 54% (95% CI: 43, 65; I2 = 99.3%) of Iranian nurses experienced medication errors. The most common types of medication errors by nurses were wrong timing 27.3% (95% CI: 19, 36; I2 = 95.8%), and wrong dosage 26.4% (95% CI: 20, 33; I2 = 91%). Additionally, the main causes of medication errors among nurses were workload 43%, fatigue 42.7%, and nursing shortage 38.8%. In this study, just 39% (95% CI: 27, 50; I2 = 97.1%) of nurses with medication errors did report their errors. Moreover, the prevalence of medication errors was more in the night shift at 41.1%. The results of the meta-regression showed that publication year and the female-to-male ratio are good predictors of medical errors, but they are not statistically significant(p > 0.05).ConclusionsTo reduce medication errors, nurses need to work in a calm environment that allows for proper nursing interventions and prevents overcrowding in departments. Additionally, considering the low reporting of medication errors to managers, support should be provided to nurses who report medication errors, in order to promote a culture of reporting these errors among Iranian nurses and ensure patient safety is not compromised.

Research on the Application of Semantic Network in Disease Diagnosis Prompts Based on Medical Corpus

Portion of the causes of medical errors in outpatient clinics are incorrect treatment resulting from misdiagnosis. Misdiagnosis between diseases is often caused by similar and indistinguishable symptoms. Currently, disease knowledge and related symptom words that are prone to misdiagnosis are scattered in various medical literature or open online databases. Therefore, it is possible to merge symptom words of related diseases, build an ontology based on the semantic relationship between symptoms, and associate the association between diseases and symptoms. This project finally established the "Disease Symptoms" Semantic Network (DSSN). Using DSSN as a basic data set can serve as prompts for diseases that are easily misdiagnosed, assisting doctors in accurately diagnosing diseases. This plays a significant role in reducing the misdiagnosis rate.

Medication error in general medicine department of tertiary care Koshi Zonal hospital in Nepal

Background: Medication errors are the leading cause of patient harm, injuries and even death in hospitalized patients. It endangers patient safety and also increases the cost of treatment leading to enhanced financial burden to the individuals and the community as well. The study was aimed to determine the pattern of occurrence of medication errors. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 188 hospitalized patients in medical ward at a Zonal Hospital. Medication errors were identified and categorized by reviewing the cardex. The data were analyzed to determine the cause of medication errors including rates of harm to patients. The descriptive statistics frequency and percentage were calculated using Microsoft Excel 2007. The findings were presented as tables and graphs. Results: A total of 985 medication errors were found in 650 (38.3%) drugs prescribed in 177 (94.1%) patients. Approximately 72.9% of the errors reached the patients and 32.39% of the errors were harmful. The most common observed errors were administration errors (41.6%) followed by prescribing errors (36.5%), transcription errors (14.3%) and monitoring errors (7.5%). Omission of prescribing information (63.88%) and wrong dosing schedule (34%) were the most common type of prescribing and transcription errors respectively. Omission of dosages administration (57.32%) to patients was the most common types of administration error. All types of medication errors were highest in the alimentary tract and metabolism class of drugs (32.39%). Conclusions: Medication errors were associated with the majority of hospitalized patients signifying the requirement of immediate preventive strategies and policies to ensure patient safety.

Improving patient safety through mandatory quality improvement (QI) education in a family medicine residency programme

Although the American College of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires that medical trainees acquire competencies in patient safety and quality improvement (QI), no standard curriculum exists. We envisaged that a...

Phar-LSTM: a pharmacological representation-based LSTM network for drug-drug interaction extraction.

Pharmacological drug interactions are among the most common causes of medication errors. Many different methods have been proposed to extract drug-drug interactions from the literature to reduce medication errors over the last few years. However, the performance of these methods can be further improved. In this paper, we present a Pharmacological representation-based Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network named Phar-LSTM. In this method, a novel embedding strategy is proposed to extract pharmacological representations from the biomedical literature, and the information related to the target drug is considered. Then, an LSTM-based multi-task learning scheme is introduced to extract features from the different but related tasks according to their corresponding pharmacological representations. Finally, the extracted features are fed to the SoftMax classifier of the corresponding task. Experimental results on the DDIExtraction 2011 and DDIExtraction 2013 corpuses show that the performance of Phar-LSTM is competitive compared with other state-of-the-art methods. Our Python implementation and the corresponding data of Phar-LSTM are available by using the DOI 10.5281/zenodo.8249384.

UnDerstandIng the cauSes of mediCation errOrs and adVerse drug evEnts for patients with mental illness in community caRe (DISCOVER): a qualitative study.

It is estimated that 237 million medication errors occur in England each year with a significant number occurring in the community. Our understanding of the causes of preventable medication errors and adverse drug events (ADE) affecting patients with mental illness is limited in this setting. Better understanding of the factors that contribute to errors can support the development of theory-driven improvement interventions. Remote qualitative semi-structured interviews with 26 community-based healthcare professionals in England and Wales were undertaken between June-November 2022. Recruitment was undertaken using purposive sampling via professional networks. Interviews were guided by the critical incident technique and analysed using the framework method. Any data that involved speculation was not included in the analysis. Independent analysis was carried out by the research team to extract themes guided by the London Protocol. A total of 43 medication errors and 12 preventable ADEs were discussed, with two ADEs having an unknown error origin. Prescribing errors were discussed most commonly (n = 24), followed by monitoring errors (n = 8). Six contributory factor themes were identified: the individual (staff); the work environment; the teams/interfaces; the organisation and management; the patient; and the task and technology. The individual (staff) factors were involved in just over 80% of all errors discussed. Participants reported a lack of knowledge regarding psychotropic medication and mental illnesses which accompanied diffusion of responsibility. There were difficulties with team communication, particularly across care interfaces, such as ambiguity/brevity of information being communicated and uncertainty concerning roles which created confusion amongst staff. Unique patient social/behavioural contributory factors were identified such as presenting with challenging behaviour and complex lifestyles, which caused difficulties attending appointments as well as affecting overall clinical management. These findings highlight that the causes of errors are multifactorial with some unique to this patient group. Key areas to target for improvement include the education/training of healthcare professionals regarding neuropharmacology/mental illnesses and enhancing communication across care interfaces. Future research should explore patient perspectives regarding this topic to help develop a holistic picture. These findings can be used to guide future intervention research to ameliorate medication safety challenges for this patient group.

Identifying and Prioritising the Causes of Medication Errors in the Pharmacy

Abstract Introduction Medication errors can negatively impact the health of numerous individuals worldwide and even lead to fatalities, from incorrect timing, dosages, or methods of administration of drugs to mismanagement of drug interactions. Such errors can arise from patients and healthcare professionals in all stages of patient care. Therefore, all healthcare workers must pay attention to preventing medication errors, correctly managing encountered errors, and reporting them appropriately to ensure patient safety. Parallel to these, one of the FIP's development goals for pharmacists was also determined as Patient Safety. Despite various studies that have analysed medication errors from different perspectives, no study has thoroughly evaluated the causes of medication errors specific to community pharmacists. Aim This project aimed to identify and prioritise the causes of medication errors encountered in community pharmacies. Methods According to the aim of the study, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 16 community pharmacists in Van. Thematic analysis was conducted on the qualitative interview findings. Additionally, at the end of the qualitative interviews, a questionnaire was applied due to the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), to prioritize the causes of the medication errors. This study was conducted after Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Non-interventional Research Ethics Committee approved the study ethically (Date:18/11/2022, Decision No: 2022/11-25). This study is supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TUBITAK)’s 2209/2022 2nd term projects (Project No: 1919B012217783). Results Three main themes and 13 sub-themes were obtained. The study's results emphasise that communication gaps and manual prescriptions are the most significant causes of medication errors reported by pharmacists. As a result of the AHP, prescription errors (31.5%) were found to be the most encountered reason for medication errors, followed by medication knowledge gaps (25.7%). Discussion/Conclusion Pharmacists, aware of their responsibilities for patient and drug safety, also have an essential role in solving problems that cause medication errors. With this study, it is also seen that pharmacists show the necessary self-sacrifice and take precautions to minimize medication errors originating from the pharmacy. So, the findings obtained from this study are thought to have guiding implications for preventing medication errors.

A cross sectional survey of nurses’ reasons for medication errors at private multispecialty hospitals in Madurai, India

Abstract Introduction Healthcare services should eliminate errors, but any human-involved tasks are prone to error and healthcare is no exception.1 Medication errors are possible in hospitals though they should be eliminated with utmost care. Such medication errors would lead to an increased fatality rate, the emergence of new diseases, increased mediation costs and extended hospital stays.2,3 Aim This cross-sectional study aimed to classify and to identify the reasons for medication error as reported by the nurses and the impact of the collaborative work of Nurses, Pharmacists and Doctors in reducing medication errors and improving patient safety. Methods An exploratory (cross-sectional) study was conducted to classify and to identify the reasons for medication error among 474 nurses working in private multispecialty hospitals in Madurai between January to May 2023. The data for the study was collected using a questionnaire which included demographic variables and questions on medication errors. The questionnaire was filled through a one-to-one interview method and the data collected were analysed using SPSS 21.0. Results The results of analyses done using SPSS revealed that 58.2% of nurses reported having made medication errors and 88.4% of them said they had reported these immediately on the occurrence of such errors to their nursing superintendents. The most common type of medication errors reported were wrong infusion rates and wrong medicines, especially for medicines with similar sounding names (sound-alike drugs). Lack of awareness of the causes of medication errors was found to be the major reason for the occurrence of such errors in hospitals. The analyses showed that there was a significant relationship between age, years of experience and medication errors. One-way ANOVA analysis revealed that the greater the age and experience, the lesser the occurrence of medication errors. However, there was no significant relationship between working shifts and medication errors. The findings also highlighted that the greater the number of patients in the ward, the higher the error in oral administration of drugs. The finding reveals that teamwork between nurses, pharmacists and doctors was reported to help to drastically reduce the number of errors. Discussion/Conclusion Whilst a small-scale study only and reliant on accurate self-reporting, the findings suggest that not all nurses report medication errors, which could result in adverse outcomes for patients. Hence the nursing managers or nursing superintendents should encourage nurses to report medication errors to ensure patient safety. The findings also suggest that collaborative work between nurses, pharmacists, and doctors can reduce medication errors, hence collaborative work and appointing clinical Pharmacists is important to reducing medication errors.

Medication error and associated factors among adults admitted to emergency ward at the university of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital, North-West Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study, 2022

BackgroundMedication errors are the most common cause of preventable adverse drug events at the emergency ward.ObjectivesThis study assessed medication errors and associated factors among adult patients admitted to the emergency ward at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, North-West Ethiopia.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from June 1, 2022, to August 30, 2022. Data were entered into EpiData Manager 4.6.0.0 for clearing and exported to SPSS version 24 for analysis. Descriptive statistics such as frequencies, medians with an interquartile range and inferential statistics like binary logistic regression were used for data analysis. The level of significance was declared at a p value less than 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval.ResultsFrom 422 study participants, medication errors were found in three-fourths (74.4%) of study participants. The most frequent type of medication error was omitted dose (26.27%). From a total of 491 medication errors, 97.75% were not prevented before reaching patients. More than one-third (38.9%) of medication errors had potentially moderate harmful outcomes. More than half (55.15%) of possible causes of medication errors committed by staff are due to behavioral factors. Physicians accepted 99.16% and nurses accepted 98.71% of clinical pharmacist intervention. Hospital stay ≥ 6 days (AOR: 3.00 95% CI 1.65–5.45, p < 0.001), polypharmacy (AOR: 5.47, 95% CI 2.77–10.81 p < 0.001), and Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3 (AOR: 1.94, 95% CI (1.02–3.68), p < 0.04) significantly associated with medication error.ConclusionsAbout three-fourths of adult patients admitted to the emergency ward experienced medication errors. A considerable amount of medication errors were potentially moderately harmful. Most medication errors were due to behavioral factors. Most clinical pharmacists’ interventions were accepted by physicians and nurses. Patients who stayed longer at the emergency ward, had a Charlson comorbidity index value of ≥ 3, and were on polypharmacy were at high risk of medication error. The hospital should strive to reduce medication errors at the emergency ward.

Comparative assessment of high-risk cardiovascular medication knowledge between practising and student nurses: a descriptive multi-centre study

&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;Aim &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;To examine unexplored knowledge of cardiovascular highrisk medications and perception thereof among practising nurses&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;and students in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;Methods&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;The multicentre cross-sectional quantitative study used an online survey dichotomised into a knowledge test (true/false&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;and multiple choice questions) and a perception assessment (closed-ended questions). Four hundred and eighteen nurses participated in the study.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;Results&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;In the knowledge test, 19 (4.5%) participants scored high (&amp;amp;ge;71%), while 83 (19.8%) and 316 (75.5%) demonstrated moderate (score &amp;amp;ge;51-70%) and poor performance (score &amp;amp;le;50%), respectively. In a comparative analysis, the knowledge level of staff nurses was significantly higher than the students but not the other&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;nurses&amp;amp;rsquo; cohort. Nurses&amp;#039; specialty and region of KSA were strongly associated with the knowledge level. Emergency room nurses and those belonging to the eastern region of KSA exhibited higher knowledge levels than other subgroups. A vast majority of nurses, 128 (30.6 %), rated their knowledge of medicines as somewhat sufficient, while quoting insufficient knowledge 226 (54.1%) as the major cause of medication errors. Three hundred and sixteen (75%) nurses expressed interest in undergoing specialised training in high-alert medication-based therapy preferably in a classroom&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;setting by 279 (66.7%).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;Conclusion&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;This study revealed a marked knowledge deficit in high-risk cardiovascular drugs among nurses. The pharmacological curriculum in nursing schools should be tailored to be clinically oriented and reinforced with problem-based learning. Continued pharmacology education focusing on high-risk drugs should be implemented among nurses to safeguard patient lives by mitigating the risks of medication error.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;