Amylase isoenzyme analysis in serum is widely used in clinical medicine for the differential diagnosis of hyperamylasemia. The major clinical application of amylase isozyme determination at the present time is the differentiation of salivary from pancreatic hyperamylasemia . In the present study, we evaluated the usefulness of the established means of amylase isozyme analysis; electrophoresis, the amylase to creatinine clearance ratio (ACCR) and the amylase inhibitor test. Isozyme analysis by electrophoresis has not been widely used in clinical laboratories because it is too technically complex and time-consuming for ready clinical use. In spite of these short comings, electrophoresis is a useful and sensitive tool for the identification of minor components of amylase isozyme observed in the serum of patients with acute pancreatitis, the variant amylase isozyme pattern seen in patients with lung cancer as well as in normal persons, macro amylasemia, and aged amylase in cases of pancreatic pseudocysts or pleural effusion . The ratio of the renal clearance of amylase to that of creatinine (ACCR) is a simple, rapid, readily available and reliable means of assessing the presence or absence of acute pancreatitis. In addition to in acute pancreatitis, recent studies have revealed a nonspecific increase in ACCR in normoamylasemic conditions such as burns, diabetic acidosis and Bence-Jones proteinemia, and in postoperative patients. In patients with conditions other than pancreatitis, however, hyperamylasemia and a high ACCR are likely to be unrelated phenomena. A cause of hyperamylasemia is not a cause of an increased ACCR and vice versa. At present, therefore, acute pancreatitis appears to be the only condition that causes elevation of both the serum amylase level and the ACCR. The assay method involving wheat inhibitor, which is a relatively specific inhibitor of salivary amylase, is a simple and accurate means of differentiating salivary from pancreatic hyperamylasemia. Except for very high or very low pancreatic amylase levels, the results obtained with the inhibitor assay show good correlation with the results as to amylase isozyme distribution determined by electrophoresis. Thus, the inhibitor assay can be reliably used to determine if a patient's hyperamylasemia or the aged amylase in biological fluids is of pancreatic or salivary origin. The inhibitor assay, however, leads to clinical confusion in patients with macroamylasemia or with variant amylase isoenzymes. Although all three techniques mentioned above can differentiate salivary from pancreatic hyperamylasemia, salivary amylases are known not to be specific to the salivary gland. At present, there is no method for determining the origin of the amylase. In addition to the knowledge that hyperamylasemia is of nonpancreatic origin, knowledge that hyperamylasemia is related to some specific organ may greatly improve the diagnostic accuracy.