Incidence Of Catheter-related Thrombosis Research Articles

[Mid-term analysis of prospective cohort study of rivaroxaban in preventing CRT in breast cancer].

Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of Rivaroxaban in preventing catheter related thrombosis (CRT) in patients with breast cancer who are undergoing central venous catheter chemotherapy, and provide basis for making standardized prevention and treatment strategies. Methods: In this research, a prospective cohort study was adopted, and breast cancer patients who received central venous catheter chemotherapy in Sanhuan Cancer Hospital during September 2020 to March 2022 were selected as a treatment group to take the rivaroxaban anticoagulation therapy with 10 mg.po.qd for one month. The control group got no preventive anticoagulation therapy. Vascular ultrasound examination was taken to confirm the occurrence of CRT, and a chi-square test was done for comparison the disparity between the groups. Logistic regression was applied to analyze the univariate and multivariate factors for the formation of CRT. Results: In the research, a total of 235 patients were selected, and there were a total of 19 035 days of catheterization with 81 days of catheterization on average. While in the control group, the incidence of CRT was 28.0% (33/118), the incidence of CRT in the treatment group was 20.5% (24/117), the difference was no significant (P=0.183). Subgroup analysis results showed that the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) was performed in 165 cases with the CRT incidence of 18.2% (30/165) and thrombosis was mostly seen around axillary vein, accounting for 63.3%. Subclavian vein catheterization was performed in 63 cases with the CRT incidence of 39.7% (25/63), and thrombosis was mostly seen around subclavian vein, accounting for 88.0% (22/25). Implantable venous access port was implanted in 7 cases around subclavian vein and internal jugular vein with the CRT incidence of 28.6% (2/7). The patients who developed CRT within 30 days after catheterization accounted for 54.4% (31/57), 22.8% (13/57) in a period during 30 days and 60 days) and 22.8% (13/57) in a period during 60 days and 180 days). The diagnosed CRT patients had been treated with rivaroxaban 15 mg.bid.po for 3 months. During the 3 months, 100.0% of the thrombosis waned, 71.9% (41/57) of the thrombosis waned within 30 days, 19.3% (11/57) in a period during 30 and 60days and 8.8% (5/57) in a period during 60 days and 90 days. Univariate and multivariate analysis indicated that the risk of CRT in subclavian vein catheterization was higher than that in PICC, respectively (OR=2.898, 95% CI:1.386-6.056 P=0.005), and the type of catheterization was an independent factor for the formation of thrombosis. Safety analysis result showed that in the prevention of CRT, rivaroxaban treatment did not induce drug-related bleeding, liver function damage, bone marrow suppression or any other side effects. While CRT diagnosed patients were treated with anticoagulation, they kept the central venous catheter, and the infusion was smooth. These patients all finished the anti-tumor treatment as planned, and no abnormalities like new thrombosis or pulmonary embolism were observed. Conclusions: In the mid-term analysis, the proportion of Rivaroxaban in preventing anticoagulant CRT decreases, but it don't reach statistical significance. The sample size should be further increased for observation. Rivaroxaban is proved effective and very safe in the treatment of CRT, and does not affect the concurrent chemotherapy. Medical personnel should carry out the policy of "early prevention, early detection and early treatment" for CRT so as to improve the patients' quality of life.

Comparison of complications and indwelling time of midline catheter at different tip locations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This review was performed to determine whether different tip locations of a midline catheter can cause differences in the incidence of complications and the catheter indwelling time. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang were systematically searched. RevMan 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was evaluated, and the mean differences or odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed statistically significant differences in the complication rates (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.34–0.84; p = 0.006) and incidence of catheter-related thrombosis (OR = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.11–0.76; p = 0.01) between midline catheter tip positioning in the subclavian vein and axillary vein. There were no significant differences in the catheter indwelling time or other complications such as phlebitis, catheter-related occlusion, catheter-related infiltration, pain, and catheter dislodgement between midline catheter tip positioning in the subclavian vein and axillary vein. There were statistically significant differences in the complication rates (OR = 0.23; 95% CI = 0.36–0.57; p < 0.001), incidence of catheter-related occlusion (OR = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.10–0.83; p = 0.02), and incidence of catheter-related infiltration (OR = 0.33; 95% CI = 0.17–0.63; p < 0.001) between midline catheter tip positioning in the proximal and distal axillary vein. Placement of the midline catheter tip in the subclavian vein was superior to that in the axillary vein in terms of complication rates and the incidence of catheter-related thrombosis. Whether different midline catheter tip locations lead to differences in the catheter indwelling time or the rates of other complications remains unclear. More high-quality studies incorporating relevant outcomes are needed for confirmation.

Clinical Factors Associated with Catheter-Related VTE in Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Introduction: In patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with increased morbidity and worse survival. Central venous catheters (CVC) are placed for administration of both stem cell products and other supportive measures. CVC are a common etiology of VTE during HCT. This study examines the associations between patient- and CVC-related variables and the incidence of catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in patients undergoing allogeneic HCT. Methods: We selected consecutive patients who underwent their first allogeneic HCT from MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2016-2020. The electronic medical records (EMR) of these patients were examined using ICD 9/10 codes, and radiology reports using a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to look for VTE events. All VTE events were confirmed via manual chart review. Details on the type of CVC, anatomic venous location, laterality, and size were extracted. For this study, CVC was defined as a catheter that extends into the superior vena cava; these catheters were classified as either a peripherally induced central catheter (PICC), non-tunneled CVC, or tunneled CVC. Unadjusted and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between patient and transplant factors and time to CRT. Acute graft versus host disease and active infection were included in the models as categorical time varying covariates. Cumulative incidence competing risk model was used to assessed CRT incidence with death as a competing cause. Results: There were 1371 adult patients included in the study. Most patients had non-tunneled CVC as their central access, with the subclavian vein being the most used location (Table 1). A total of 207 patients had VTE during the first year post-HCT, with 153 having isolated CRT and 54 having other VTE (Table 1). The incidence of CRT was 7.7% at 100-day and 11.3% at 1-year, with the incidence rate at a near constant estimate in the first 100 days. The cumulative incidence of DVT/PE with death as a competing risk factor was 1.17% at 100-day and 4.08% at 1-year. In Cox regression models for CRT by 100 days, history of VTE, higher platelet count, acute GVH disease stage 3-4, and infection were statistically associated with time to CRT (Table 2). The type of CVC (non-tunneled CVC and PICC vs. tunneled CVC) was non-significantly associated with increased risk of CRT. Conclusion: In our cohort of patients undergoing allogeneic HCT, the incidence of CRT appeared to be higher than that reported in the literature. Significant risk factors associated with CRT occurred included VTE history, higher pre-transplant platelet count, and development of severe acute GVHD or active infection. While the type of CVC did not reach statistical significance due to the majority of patients receiving non-tunneled CVC as a standard institutional practice, there was a trend of increased CVC in this group of patients. Future multi-center studies that incorporate different types of CVC will further elucidate this potential association with CRT post-transplant.

Postoperative intermittent pneumatic compression for preventing venous thromboembolism in Chinese lung cancer patients: a randomized clinical trial

BackgroundPostoperative lung cancer patients belong to the high-risk group for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The standardized preventive measures for perioperative VTE in lung cancer are not perfect, especially for the prevention and treatment of catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) caused by carried central venous catheters (CVCs) in lung cancer surgery.Patients and methodsThis study included 460 patients with lung cancer undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in our center from July 2020 to June 2021. Patients were randomized into two groups, and intraoperatively-placed CVCs would be carried to discharge. During hospitalization, the control group was treated with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and the experimental group with LMWH + intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC). Vascular ultrasound was performed at three time points which included before surgery, before discharge, and one month after discharge. The incidence of VTE between the two groups was studied by the Log-binomial regression model.ResultsCRT occurred in 71.7% of the experimental group and 79.7% of the control group. The multivariate regression showed that the risk of developing CRT in the experimental group was lower than in the control group (Adjusted RR = 0.889 [95%CI0.799–0.989], p = 0.031), with no heterogeneity in subgroups (P for Interaction > 0.05). Moreover, the fibrinogen of patients in the experimental group was lower than control group at follow-up (P = 0.019).ConclusionIPC reduced the incidence of CRT during hospitalization in lung cancer patients after surgery.Trial registrationNo. ChiCTR2000034511.

Heparinized Saline Flushed Catheter May Reduce Risk of Thrombosis in Cancer Patients Received Chemotherapy with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter

Objective: This study investigated the effect of heparinized saline flushed catheter on preventing catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) among cancer patients received peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) for chemotherapy. Background: CRT is a common and serious complication when using PICC, which is one of the most commonly used vascular access devices for drug infusion, intravenous nutrition, and chemotherapy. Methods: This prospective, paralled-group trial enrolled 300 cancer patients received chemotherapy who were randomly assigned to the intervention (n=150) or control (n=150) group. Besides the basic procedure of PICC combined with IC- ECG and B-mode ultrasound imaging, heparinized saline flushed catheters were used in the intervention group, while normal saline flushed ones were used in the control group. Hemorheology tests and tip sites measurements were used in outcome evaluation, and the incidences of CRT and other complications. In additions, thromboelastogram (TEG) were used to measure thrombus elastic before and one week after PICC. Results: 148 patients in the intervention group and 138 patients in the control group finished PICC and follow-ups, which indicating longer duration and more completion of PICC with better catheter tip positioning in the intervention group. Intervention subjects showed significant lower incidences of CRT and other complications (phlebitis, catheter blockage, catheter prolapse, and local infection) (P <.05). In additons, our proposed method may reduce CRT incidence via significantly improving blood circulation among patients received chemotherapy via PICC. Conclusion: Heparinized saline flushed catheter may increase chemotherapy completion quality via PICC, reduce the risk of catheter-related thrombosis complications, and reduce CRT incidence via improving blood circulation. Conclusions: This proposed method can be easily introduced to prolong the duration of the placement and improve the blood circulation of cancer patients received PICC.

Evaluation of venous thromboembolism risk factors reveals subtype heterogenicity in children with central venous catheters: a multicenter study from the Children’s Hospital Acquired Thrombosis consortium

BackgroundAcutely ill and medically complex children frequently rely on central venous catheters (CVCs) to provide life-sustaining treatment. Unfortunately, catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) is a serious and common complication. Little is known why some with a CVC develop CRT and others develop venous thromboembolism unrelated to the CVC (non-CRT). ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to identify factors associated with CRT in children with hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE). MethodsThis case-case study included participants in the Children’s Hospital Acquired Thrombosis Registry with HA-VTE and CVC aged 0 to 21 years from 8 US children’s hospitals. Participants were excluded if they developed HA-VTE prior to CVC insertion or if the CVC insertion date was unknown. Logistic regression models were used to assess associations between clinical factors and CRT status. ResultsThere were 1144 participants with HA-VTE who had a CVC. CRT developed in 833 participants, and 311 developed non-CRT. Multivariable analysis showed increased odds of CRT (compared with non-CRT) in participants with peripherally inserted central catheters (odds ratio [OR], 3.80; 95% CI, 2.04-7.10; p < .001), CVCs inserted in the femoral vein (OR, 4.45; 95% CI, 1.70-11.65; p = .002), multiple CVCs (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.18-1.71; p < .001), and CVC malfunction (OR, 3.30; 95% CI, 1.80-6.03; p < .001). ConclusionThe findings of this study provide new insights on risk factor differences between CRT and non-CRT. Prevention efforts should be directed at modifying the type of CVC, insertion location, and/or number of CVCs placed, if possible, to decrease the incidence of CRT.

Risk factors for central venous catheter-related thrombosis in hospitalized children: a single-center a retrospective cohort study.

This study aimed to explore the risk factors of catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in children in Southwest China who underwent central venous catheter (CVC) insertion. An observational cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary center in southwest China between November 2019 and February 2020. All patients who received a CVC were enrolled and Doppler-ultrasound examination was performed weekly until CVC removal. All patients in this study were hospitalized and were observed and followed up in this hospital. Patient demographics, medication, biochemical indexes, catheter maintenance practice, activities after CVC placement data were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the incidence of CRT, and the Cox regression model was used to analyze the factors influencing CRT. A total of 594 children were included in the study, and the median indwelling time was 10 days, with the shortest being 1 day and the longest 60 days. The overall incidence of CRT was 26.60% (158/594), the 15-day cumulative incidence rate was 30.81%, and the 45-day cumulative incidence rate was 46.27%. After 45 days, the incidence of CRT further increased. Age <12 months [hazard ratio (HR), 1.654; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.171-2.338], use of 20% mannitol or glycerol fructose (HR, 1.593; 95% CI: 1.058-2.398), CVC placement by a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) doctor (HR, 1.921; 95% CI: 1.347-2.740), placement length ≥9 cm (HR, 1.633; 95% CI: 1.142-2.336), and D-dimer >1.5 mg/L (HR, 1.451; 95% CI: 1.044-2.015) were risk factors for CRT. Limb exercises (HR, 0.660; 95% CI: 0.469-0.929) after placement was a protective factor for CRT. The incidence of CRT was higher in children with CVCs, and the key duration of CRT monitoring should be within 15 and 45 days after placement. Patients with age <12 months, using 20% mannitol or glycerol fructose, insertion length ≥9 cm, D-dimer >1.5 mg/L before placement are more likely to happen CVC-CRT than other patient, and it is necessary to be highly vigilant and take preventive measures.

Conditional catheter-related thrombosis free probability and risk-adapted choices of catheter for lung cancer.

BackgroundCurrent predictive tools assess catheter‐related thrombosis (CRT) in patients with lung cancer in a static manner at a single time point of catheterization. The subsequent hazard changes over time are unknown. The conditional catheter‐related thrombosis‐free probability (CCFP) can provide dynamic information on continual CRT‐free expectations. This study aimed to assess the CCFP and hazard rates based on risk categories and various venous access devices (VADs).MethodsThis retrospective study reviewed 939 patients with lung cancer with peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) or central venous catheters (CVCs) identified at the National Clinical Research Center for Cancer between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018. The incidence of CRT has also been reported. Patients were stratified into low‐ and high‐risk groups according to multivariate Cox regression analyses. CCFP is defined as the CRT‐free probability given that patients have no CRT for a definite time.ResultsA total of 507 patients with PICCs and 432 patients with CVCs were included in this study. The 3‐month CCFP increased from 74.2% at catheter insertion to 93.6% at 3 months. The hazards of CRT in the first month were highest (16.4%) and slightly thereafter. The high‐risk group initially had a higher (21.4%) but significantly decreased CRT hazard after 2 months (8.3%), whereas the low‐risk group maintained a comparable lower risk hazard of less than 5% after 1 month. In the overall cohort, patients with CVCs had lower CRT probability than those with PICCs (HR, 1.76; 95% CI: 1.28–2.41; p < 0.01). Further analysis demonstrated that compared with PICCs, CVCs provided a CRT‐free benefit in low‐risk patients (p = 0.02) but not in high‐risk patients (p = 0.06).ConclusionsCCFP increased, and the hazards of CRT decreased over time in a risk‐dependent manner in patients with lung cancer. These valuable dynamic data may help optimize risk‐adjusted choices of VADs and risk‐adjusted prophylactic anticoagulation strategies for patients.

Prophylactic anticoagulation in children receiving home parenteral nutrition.

Children with intestinal failure (IF) are at risk of loss of vascular access because of catheter-related venous thrombosis. Whether primary prophylactic anticoagulation is effective and safe in preventing catheter-related thrombosis is largely unknown. Our aim was to assess the incidences of catheter-related venous thrombosis and bleeding complications in children with IF receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN) treated with primary prophylactic anticoagulation. All children, aged 0-18 years, treated with HPN at the Emma Children's Hospital/Amsterdam UMC were followed from January 2007 to July 2019. All patients were offered primary prophylactic anticoagulation from the start of HPN. The primary outcomes were catheter-related venous thrombosis and bleeding on prophylactic anticoagulation. In total, 55 (76%) of 74 patients received primary prophylactic anticoagulation. The median age at the start of prophylaxis was 8.4 (interquartile range [IQR], 5.0-55.7) months. Patients were followed for a median of 31.2 (IQR, 10.7-53.5) months, with a total of 65,463 catheter days. The incidence of catheter-related thrombosis on prophylactic anticoagulation was 0.2 per 1000 catheter days. In total, the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding was 0.1 per 1000 catheter days. The median time to first event was 1268 (IQR, 149-2014) days for thrombosis and 389 (IQR, 227-2912) days for clinically relevant bleeding. Cumulative event-free survival after 5 years was 78% for thrombosis. Our study shows a low rate of catheter-related venous thrombosis and a slightly elevated rate of clinically relevant bleeding in children receiving HPN and primary prophylactic anticoagulation.

Catheter-related thrombosis after cardiac surgery in patients with both central venous and pulmonary artery catheters inserted into the right internal jugular vein: a single-center, prospective, observational study.

Central venous catheters (CVCs) and pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) are widely used in intensive care and perioperative management. The detection and prevention of catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) are important because CRT is a complication of catheter use and can cause pulmonary embolism and bloodstream infection. Currently, there is no evidence for CRT in patients using both CVC and PAC. We conducted a single-center, prospective, observational study to identify the incidence, timing, and risk factors for CRT in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery and using a combination of CVC and PAC through the right internal jugular vein (RIJV). Out of 50 patients, CRT was observed using ultrasonography in 39 patients (78%), and the median time of CRT formation was 1day (interquartile range: 1-1.5) after catheter insertion. The mean duration of PAC placement was 3days (interquartile range: 2-5), and the maximum diameter of CRT was 12mm (interquartile range: 10-15). In short-axis images, CRT occupied more than half of the cross-sectional area of the RIJV in five patients (10%), and CRT completely occluded the RIJV in one patient (2%). Platelet count, duration of PAC placement, and intraoperative bleeding amount were found to be high-risk indicators of CRT. In conclusion, patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery and using both CVC and PAC had a high incidence of CRT. Avoiding unnecessary PAC placement and early removal of catheters in patients at high risk of developing CRT may prevent the development of CRT.

A comparative study on the tip position of peripherally inserted central catheter inserted at two forward P-wave amplitudes by intracavitary electrocardiogram in cancer patients.

This study aimed to compare the tip location of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) under two forward P-wave amplitudes (P-wave amplitude is the autonomous peak or P-wave amplitude is 50-80% of the QRS main wave) by intracavitary electrocardiogram (IC-EKG) to determine the PICC tip in optimal location thus avoiding catheter-related complications. The data of 300 cancer patients with PICC insertion were collected retrospectively. For the observation group, the position of the catheter tip was left at the level when P wave amplitude was its autonomous peak (168 patients catheterized in 2018). While for the control group, the catheter tip was left at the level when the P wave amplitude was 50-80% of the QRS main wave (132 patients catheterized in 2017). Both groups of patients underwent the chest X-ray examination (CXR) after catheterization. The total compliance rate [PICC tip was located in the lower third of the Superior Vena Cava (SVC) and the Cavo-Atrial Junction (CAJ)], the optimal position compliance rate (PICC tip was located in the CAJ), and the incidence of the catheter tip malposition were compared between the two groups. The complications after catheterization including arrhythmia after catheterization within 24 hours, catheter-related thrombosis, catheter dysfunction, and catheter infection within 90 days were also compared. There was no difference in the total compliance rate of PICC tip position and the incidence of the catheter malposition in the two groups (P>0.05). But the optimal position compliance rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of arrhythmia after catheterization within 24 hours of the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of catheter-related thrombosis, catheter dysfunction, and catheter infection within 90 days in the observation group was lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The PICC tip position at the autonomous peak of the P wave is significantly better than that at the P wave amplitude being 50-80% of the QRS main wave under the IC-EKG guidance for PICC insertion.

Risk Factors for Catheter-Related Thrombosis in Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.

Background and Objectives: Cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) is a common complication of neoplasms. Multiple myeloma (MM) carries one of the highest risks of CAT, especially in the early phases of treatment. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as the standard of care in transplant-eligible patients with MM carries a risk of catheter-related thrombosis (CRT). The aim of this study was identification of the risk factors of CRT in MM patients undergoing ASCT in 2009–2019. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with MM undergoing ASCT. Each patient had central venous catheter (CVC) insertion before the procedure. The clinical symptoms of CRT (edema, redness, pain in the CVC insertion area) were confirmed with Doppler ultrasound examination. We examined the impacts of four groups of factors on CRT development: (1) patient-related: age, gender, Body Mass Index (BMI), obesity, Charlson comorbidity index, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation comorbidity index, renal insufficiency, and previous thrombotic history; (2) disease-related: monoclonal protein type, stage of the disease according to Salmon–Durie and International Staging System, number of prior therapy lines, and MM response before ASCT; (3) treatment-related: melphalan dose, transplant-related complications, and duration of post-ASCT neutropenia; (4) CVC-related: location, time from placement to removal. Results: Symptomatic CRT was present in 2.5% (7/276) of patients. Univariate analysis showed an increased risk of CRT in patients with a catheter-related infection (OR 2.4, 95% CI; 1.109–5.19, p = 0.026), previous thrombotic episode (OR 2.49, 95% CI; 1.15–5.39, p = 0.021), previous thrombotic episode on initial myeloma treatment (OR 2.75, 95% CI; 1.15–6.53, p = 0.022), and gastrointestinal complications of ASCT such as vomiting and diarrhea (OR 3.87, 95% CI; 1.57–9.53, p = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, noninfectious complications were associated with higher CRT incidence (OR 2.75, 95% CI; 1.10–6.19, p = 0.031). Conclusions: The incidence of symptomatic CRT in ASCT in MM was relatively low. Previous thrombotic events, especially during the induction of myeloma treatment, increased CRT risk during ASCT. Dehydration following gastrointestinal complications may predispose to higher CRT incidence.

[Exploration of the high-risk factors of catheter-related thrombosis in breast cancer].

Objective: To explore the high risk factors of catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in breast cancer patients, and provide the basis for the development of appropriate prevention and treatment strategies. Methods: A total of 1 432 breast cancer patients scheduled to receive central venous catheterization in National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College from January 1, 2015 to August 31, 2019 were selected. Baseline information and catheterization information of patients were collected. The occurrence of CRT was confirmed by vascular ultrasound examination, and the influencing factors of CRT were analyzed. Results: The total number of catheter days were 121, 980 days in 1 432 patients with breast cancer, and the average number of catheter days in each patient was 85.2 days. The incidence of CRT was 6.8% (97/1 432), which was 0.79 cases/1 000 catheter days. Among 815 patients with centrally inserted central venous catheters (CICC), 43 (5.3%) had CRT, which was 0.70 cases/1 000 catheter days. Among 617 patients with peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC), 54 (8.8%) developed CRT, which was 0.90 cases/1 000 catheter days. CRT was most common in subclavian vein (63.9%). Multivariate regression analysis showed that age ≥ 60 years old (OR=1.712, 95% CI: 1.056-2.775, P=0.029), PICC (OR=1.732, 95% CI: 1.130-2.656, P=0.012), the catheter position except subclavian vein (OR=10.420, 95% CI: 1.207-89.991), secondary adjustment of catheter position (OR=3.985, 95% CI: 1.510-10.521, P=0.005) and high D-Dimer level (OR=1.129, 95% CI: 1.026-1.241, P=0.012)were independent risk factors for CRT. Conclusions: The CRT problem can't be ignored in the clinical treatment of breast cancer patients with central venous catheterization. Screening the appropriate age of patients and the type of central venous catheters, reducing the secondary adjustment of catheter position, and timely monitoring the level of D-dimer are helpful to the prevention and treatment of CRT.

Catheter-Related Thrombosis in Patients with Lymphoma or Myeloma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Background: Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) occurs frequently during autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) and its current management is highly variable. There is limited data regarding the incidence, risk factors, management patterns and outcomes of CRT in patients with lymphoma or myeloma undergoing AHCT.Methods: In a retrospective observational study with nested case-control risk factor analysis, we examined 789 patients with lymphoma and myeloma who underwent AHCT at University of Minnesota between 2006-2016. We identified 50 subjects with CRT from central venous catheters (CVCs). Patient and transplant characteristics and outcomes were compared in the case-control analysis with 2:1 matching by patient age and disease. All AHCT recipients underwent insertion of tunneled 14.5fr double lumen large bore tunneled catheters for hematopoietic cell apheresis. All patients underwent routine CT chest prior to AHCT and at days 28 and 100 post-transplant. The primary objective was to describe the CRT incidence, management and complications. Secondary objective was to identify CRT risk factors. Statistical comparison of categorical variables was performed by χ2 and Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for assessment of continuous variables between cases and controls.Results: The incidence of CRT in patients with lymphoma and myeloma undergoing AHCT over the ten-year period was 6.3% (n=50); with 32% symptomatic. Out of 50 cases, 43 occurred within 100 days of AHCT and 94% cases were associated with tunneled line; predominantly internal jugular (90%). CRT was diagnosed between 21 days prior to 26 days after CVC insertion. Five patients had pulmonary embolism detected incidentally by CT imaging; all were asymptomatic. The median time from tunneled line placement to CRT was 44 days (11-89 days) Of the 50 patients with CRT, 22% had refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma (incidence in HL 11.0%), 62% non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (incidence in NHL 10.1%) and 16% myeloma (incidence in MM 2.1%). The median age at the time of CRT was 56.6 years; 60% were male. Prior radiation to chest/neck (18%), bulky mediastinal mass (12%), splenectomy (6%), bacteremia (18%), hormonal therapy (8%), and prior VTE (16%) were common amongst CRT cases. Half of CRT cases had a Port-a-cath and 46% had more than one CVC inserted peritransplant. Vein occlusion was complete in 46% and occurred with the same frequency on left and right (44% vs 42%). At the time of CRT, median platelet count was 133 (range 31-426 x 109/L). Median time of tunneled line removal was 0 days (ie. on same day as CRT) but ranged from 21 days before CRT to 161 days after CRT.Most (86%) CRTs were treated with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and 56% received subsequent warfarin. Only 2% were treated with unfractionated heparin. LMWH at dose 1 mg/kg twice daily was administered if platelet count could be maintained above 50 x 109/L and median time to platelet recovery was 15 days (range 9-36). Patients were anticoagulated for <3 months (38%), 3-6 months (24%), and >6 months (22%). One patient required lytic therapy for CRT. Only two patients (4%) received secondary prophylactic anticoagulation after AHCT. This management was safe and effective and grade 1-2 bleeding events occurred in only two patients (4%) during anticoagulation. Five patients (10%) had CRT recurrence or extension while 12% had subsequent VTE after CRT. No deaths occurred due to CRT or its treatment.In univariate analysis, risk factors for CRT included prior VTE event (20.9% vs 7.0%, p=0.02) and higher WBC peak at mobilization (43.5 vs 40.4 x 109/L, p=0.17) and stem cell engraftment (15.2 vs 11.9 x 109/L, p=0.18). Gender, presence of Port-a-cath, comorbidity index and Karnofsky score did not increase the risk of CRT. Two-year progression-free survival of entire group was 54% (95% CI 50-57%) and was not affected by CRT (p=0.42).Conclusions: The diagnosis of CRT complicates AHCT and appears to be more common in patients with lymphoma than myeloma. Prior VTE is the main risk factor for CRT. Anticoagulation with LMWH or warfarin appeared safe , however many patients had recurrent VTE events. Higher WBC seems to be associated with risk of thrombosis. Further study to define additional risk factors and examine the management strategies is warranted. DisclosuresBachanova:Seattle-Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Zymogen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oxis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Catheter-Related Thrombosis Incidence and Risk Factors in Adult Cancer Patients with Central Venous Access Devices

▪Central venous access devices (CVADs) are commonly employed in the management of cancer patients, facilitating administration of chemotherapy, parenteral nutrition, blood products and antibiotics, and stem cell collection/reinfusion. Previous studies have demonstrated certain cancer subtypes to have a higher risk of thrombosis, when incorporated into a risk scoring system. We sought to review the incidence and risk factors for catheter related thrombosis (CRT) in a large cohort of hematology and oncology patients using a retrospective study in an Australian tertiary hospital, including the influence of cancer subtype.We reviewed data from a prospectively gathered CVAD database. The presence of CRT was defined as a positive duplex ultrasound scan either while line was in situ or within one week of line removal. Only patients symptomatic for CRT underwent USS imaging. We performed univariate and multivariate cox regression, and competing risk analysis to assess which parameters were associated with an increased risk of CRT.5043 central lines were inserted into 3218 patients between Jan 2003 and Dec 2016 with the majority (72%) of lines being peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). Overall incidence of CRT was 3.55%, at a rate of 0.45 per 1000 line days. CRT developed at a median of 12 days following line insertion. In univariate analysis, PICCs were associated with the highest rates of CRT (HR 7.48, 95%CI 1.03-54.1, p=0.046) when compared to non-tunnelled lines, while implantable ports (HR 0.47 95%CI 0.03-7.90 p=0.597) and tunnelled catheters (HR 0.00) were not associated with increased thrombosis risk. Patient age <50 (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.06-2.00, p=0.019) and number of prior CRT (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.30-2.92, p=0.01) were associated with higher thrombosis rates in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, PICC lines (HR 8.63, 95% CI: 1.17-63.5 p=0.034) and number of prior CRT (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.18-2.86, P=0.007) increased CRT risk. Age groups 50-61 (HR 0.56 95% CI 0.37-0.83 p=0.004) and > 61 (HR 0.65 95% CI 0.46-0.91 p=0.012) were associated with reduced risk compared to age group <50. We used the tumor score from the previously validated Khorana score and found mixed results, with intermediate, but not high-risk tumours associated with higher thrombosis risk (HR1.42 95%CI 1.03-1.95 p=0.031 and HR 0.65 95% CI 0.26-1.60 p=0,346 respectively). When individual cancer subtypes were analysed in univariate analysis, Hodgkin lymphoma (HR 2.43 95% CI 1.01-5.82 p=0.046) and germ cell tumours (HR 2.63 95% CI 1.05-6.55 p=0.038) were found to be associated with increased CRT rates. However, once controlling for age and line type in multivariate analysis, no subgroup of cancer was associated with higher CRT rates. Side of insertion was not associated with higher thrombosis risk (left vs right HR 0.79 95% CI 0.58-1.07 P=0.13). When the analysis was restricted to PICC lines (n=3642), we found no difference in significant predictors of CRT.In conclusion, this is the largest published series reviewing CRT from a single centre. In patients with cancer, age <50, presence of a PICC line and prior CRT were associated with higher risk of CRT. Cancer subtype and insertion side were not significant predictors of thrombosis in this series. DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Risk Factors of PICC-Related Venous Thrombosis in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy.

BackgroundTo analyze the risk factors of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)-related venous thrombosis in patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy and explore its preventive measures.MethodsData of 780 patients with breast cancer who underwent PICC chemotherapy in our hospital from January 2014 to June 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The incidence of catheter-related thrombosis was observed, and related factors of venous thrombosis were analyzed.ResultsAmong the 780 patients with breast cancer, 36 developed PICC-related venous thrombosis. The incidence of which was 4.62% (36/780). The PICC retention time ranged between 60 and 136 days, and the median time was 92 days. Thrombosis was found to occur within seven days after catheterization in three patients (8.33%), between 7 and 30 days in 18 patients (50%), between 31 and 92 days in 12 patients (33.3%), and ≥92 days in three patients (8.33%). Basilic vein puncture-induced thrombosis occurred in 25 patients (3.68%), and median cubital vein and cephalic vein puncture-induced thrombosis occurred in 11 patients (10.78%). The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.001). Thrombosis was not associated with age, punctured limb, platelet count, or chemotherapy drugs (P > 0.05).ConclusionBlood vessel puncture was the main factor that affected PICC-related thrombosis in breast cancer chemotherapy. The basilic vein should be the primary choice for blood vessel puncture. Prolonged catheter retention does not increase the risk of thrombosis.

Catheter related thrombosis in hospitalized infants: A neural network approach to predict risk factors

IntroductionWe sought to investigate the predictors of catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in a cohort of critically ill hospitalized infants and using a novel approach (the artificial neural network - ANN) in combination with conventional statistics to identify/confirm those predictors. MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of all infants with a central or peripherally inserted central venous catheter (CVC/PICC) between 2015 and 2018. ANN was generated to investigate the predictors of CRT. The predictive variables examined in the ANN were age, gender, weight, co-morbid conditions, line type, use of ultrasound (USG), emergent line placement, location of line tip, any major surgical procedures, use of mechanical ventilation, exposure to cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB), past-history of CVC/PICC, or thrombosis. Binary logistic regression was performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and determine which factors were significant in predicting CRT. ResultsOf total of 613 infants, 59.9% of patients had a history of previous CVC or PICC and 12.2% had a history of thrombus as documented by USG in the past three months. CPB exposure was present in 48.1%. The incidence of CRT was 10.7%. Independent predictors of CRT were the line tip in IVC (OR: 2.37, 1.08–5.21, P = 0.032), history of thrombosis (OR: 2.40, 1.16–4.96, P = 0.019), previous CVC/PICC (OR: 2.80, 1.24–6.33, P = 0.014) and exposure to CPB (OR: 2.749, 1.08–6.98, P = 0.034). A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the normalized importance of each variable used to create the ANN. The most important variables were age (with normalized importance of 100%), history of thrombosis, weight, and exposure to CPB (normalized importance of 68.2%). ConclusionsNearly 1 in 10 infants developed CRT. We found that catheter tip in IVC, exposure to CPB, history of vein thrombosis and history of CVC/PICC placement in the past 3 months are independently associated with a higher risk of CRT in infants by using conventional and neural network methods.

Catheter-related thrombosis incidence and risk factors in adult cancer patients with central venous access devices.

Central venous access devices (CVAD) are commonly employed in the management of cancer patients. While having several benefits they are associated with significant risks. To review the incidence and risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in cancer patients with a CVAD. We performed a prospective observational cohort study of adult patients with cancer requiring a CVAD between 1 January 2004 and 29 June 2016. The rate of, and risk factors for the development of, symptomatic CRT were evaluated. A total of 4920 central lines was inserted into 3130 patients. The incidence of CRT was 3.6%. CRT developed a median of 12 days following line insertion. Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) were associated with the highest rates of CRT (hazards ratio (HR) 22.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-170.6). Older age groups developed CRT at lower rates (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.39-0.84 for age 50-61 years, and HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.45-0.89 for age >61 years) compared to age <50 years. Increased CRT was seen in patients with prior CRT (HR 1.81; 95% CI 1.19-2.77). There was a trend to more CRT events with a Khorana tumour score of 1 compared to those with a score of 0 (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.00-1.88). Hodgkin lymphoma, germ cell and oesophagus cancers had the highest CRT rates. Side of insertion was not associated with thrombosis risk (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.57-1.05; P = 0.10). Age <50 years, PICC lines and prior CRT were associated with highest CRT rate. Cancer subtype and insertion side were not predictive of thrombosis.

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Related Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study on Incidence and Risk Factors in a Single Center

INTRODUCTION: The use of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICCs) has increased significantly in the last years due to their advantages compared to the other types of central catheters: easier and protocolized insertion by specialized nurse-led teams; cost-effectiveness; ease of management, ... However, an increase in the incidence of Catheter Related Thrombosis (CRT) has been observed with this type of device, especially in cancer patients and in the critical care setting. The main objective of this study is to determine the incidence of PICC related deep venous thrombosis in oncologic and onco-hematologic patients at the Donostia University Hospital, in Spain. The secondary outcome is the identification of possible risk factors associated with this event. METHODS: Using the database created and handled by the nurse-led Intravenous Therapy Team (ITT) in our center, in which all inserted PICCs are prospectively and consecutively included since 2011, a retrospective analysis was conducted on oncology and hemato-oncology-derived adult patients (over 18 years old) with a PICC inserted between May 15th 2018 and December 15th 2019. In the total population, several characteristics of the patient, of the PICC and of the thrombotic event were descriptively analyzed, and a bivariant analysis of four potential risk factors was carried out using Pearson's Chi-squared test. Patient and CRT treatment-associated risk factors were more exhaustively analyzed in the subgroup of patients with CRT. The missing data were obtained from the electronic clinical history records. RESULTS: The final study sample consisted of 1024 PICCs (n=1024), 19,10% (n=313) derived from the Hematology department and 43,62% (n=715) from the Oncology department (tables 1 and 2). The global incidence of CRT was 4,9% (n=50): 5.8% in hematologic patients and 4.5% in patients derived from Oncology. In the bivariant analysis no significant association was found between the selected potential risk factors (department of origin, PICC lumen number, PICC material and the catheter-to-vessel ratio) and CRT (table 3). In terms of the treatment administered to patients presenting CRT, in 80% of the cases (n=40) a Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) at therapeutic dose was initiated; in 10% (n=5) LMWH at a lower dose, and in 2 patients treatment could not be initiated because of thrombopenia. Finally, the PICC was withdrawn in only 8 patients after the diagnosis of the thrombotic event. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the studies on PICC associated venous thrombosis in cancer patients are small, observational, retrospective, and without comparison groups. Here we present a work with an important sample size, a homogeneous population and with a prospective data collection. The CRT incidence has been similar to that described in the literature and significant association has not been found between the included potential risk factors and CRT. In conclusion, this study reflects the need of more trials on this subject, in particular to identify CRT risk factors in order to design effective prevention strategies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Early prophylaxis of central venous catheter-related thrombosis using 1% chlorhexidine gluconate and chlorhexidine-gel-impregnated dressings: a retrospective cohort study

To determine the prophylactic effect of using combined 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine gluconate and chlorhexidine gel-impregnated dressings (CGCD) on catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in critically ill patients. This retrospective cohort study was performed in an intensive care unit from November 2009 to August 2014. The CRT incidence diagnosed with ultrasound examination was compared between patients applying CGCD and combined 10% aqueous povidone-iodine and standard transparent dressings (PITD) after central venous catheter insertion into the internal jugular vein for ≥ 48 h. CRT was stratified into early (within 7 days) and late (days 8–14) thromboses. Multivariate analyses using logistic regression models clarified the relationships between early- and late-CRT risks and skin antiseptic and catheter site dressing combinations. CRT occurred in 74 of 134 patients (55%), including 52 with early CRT and 22 with late CRT. Patients receiving CGCD had a significantly lower incidence of early CRT than those receiving PITD (odds ratio = 0.18; 95% confidence interval = 0.07–0.45, p  < .001). No significant association was evident between using CGCD and late CRT (p  = .514). Compared to PITD, CGCD reduced the CRT risk over 7 days in critically ill patients.UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000037492.