Catheter-related Deep Vein Thrombosis Research Articles

Incidence and risk factors for postthrombotic syndrome in neonates and children in a single-center cohort study

Postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a chronic condition following deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and is associated with pain, swelling, and restricted use of the affected limb. In pediatric age groups, its incidence and risk factors are not well-known. This observational cohort study of all consecutive children (≤18 years) with DVT treated at the Emma Children’s Hospital Amsterdam between January 2001 and January 2021 was conducted to identify incidence and risk factors for PTS in neonates aged ≤2 months and children aged >2 months. PTS was diagnosed using the modified Villalta scale. In total, 315 patients were included. The 20-year incidence of PTS was 20.0% in neonates and 40.0% in children. In neonates, involvement of ≥3 vessels (odds ratio [OR], 6.6; 95% CI, 1.6-26.4) and incomplete thrombus resolution (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.1-8.0) were risk factors for PTS. In children, involvement of ≥3 vessels (OR, 6.2; 95% CI, 2.2-17.8), recurrent DVT (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.3-10.3), and incomplete thrombus resolution (OR, 5.2; 95% CI, 1.6-17.0) were associated with PTS. Exercise ≥3 times/wk (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.9), central venous catheter-related DVT (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.5), and provoked DVT (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.1-0.97) were protective factors for PTS. This study demonstrated a high incidence of pediatric PTS. Additionally, risk factors for PTS differed between neonates and children. These findings provide a basis for better prevention and management of PTS that may differ between neonates and children.

Catheter-related deep vein thrombosis: Where are we at and where are we going? Updates and ongoing unmet clinical needs.

Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) is one of the major complications affecting patients with indwelling venous catheters, usually involving the upper extremity deep venous system. This condition can lead to potentially life-threatening complications such as pulmonary embolism and sepsis. The risk of developing CRT varies depending on type of catheters and patient characteristics. Despite advances in materials and technologies, the actual incidence of CRT is still considerable. Available evidence on CRT management remains controversial, and clinical guidelines base their recommendations on data from non-catheter related upper extremity or lower extremity deep venous thromboses. This narrative review aims to describe the epidemiology of CRT, to review the available evidence on its management and to highlight the current unmet needs. No formal search strategy was applied for the revision of the literature. The main sources of information used were Medline and guidelines from international societies. The management of CRT requires a careful balance between the risk of thrombus progression, recurrent events, and systemic embolization and the increased bleeding risk in often fragile patients. Open issues include the optimal management of the catheter and the type and duration of anticoagulant therapy. Direct oral anticoagulants are increasingly prescribed, representing an important alternative to the standard of care low molecular weight heparins in selected cases. The development of new anticoagulant drugs such as factors XI and XII inhibitors may offer further advantages in this context. The management of CRT is still challenging with constant need for updated evidence to support tailored approaches.

Bloodstream infections among patients receiving therapeutic plasma exchanges in the intensive care unit: a 10 year multicentric study

BackgroundTherapeutic plasma exchanges (TPE), which affect the humoral response, are often performed in combination with immunosuppressive drugs. For this reason, TPE may be associated with an increased susceptibility to infections. We aimed to describe blood stream infection (BSI) incidence in ICU patients treated with TPE and to identify associated risk factors.MethodsWe retrospectively included patients that had received at least one session of TPE in the ICU of one of the 4 participating centers (all in Paris, France) between January 1st 2010 and December 31th 2019. Patients presenting with a BSI during ICU stay were compared to patients without such an infection. Risk factors for BSI were identified by a multivariate logistic regression model.ResultsOver 10 years in the 4 ICUs, 387 patients were included, with a median of 5 [2–7] TPE sessions per patient. Most frequent indications for TPE were thrombotic microangiopathy (47%), central nervous system inflammatory disorders (11%), hyperviscosity syndrome (11%) and ANCA associated vasculitis (8.5%). Thirty-one patients (8%) presented with a BSI during their ICU stay, a median of 7 [3–11] days after start of TPE. In a multivariate logistic regression model, diabetes (OR 3.32 [1.21–8.32]) and total number of TPE sessions (OR 1.14 [1.08–1.20]) were independent risk factors for BSI. There was no difference between TPE catheter infection related BSI (n = 11 (35%)) and other sources of BSI (n = 20 (65%)) regarding catheter insertion site (p = 0.458) or rate of TPE catheter related deep vein thrombosis (p = 0.601). ICU course was severe in patients presenting with BSI when compared to patients without BSI, with higher need for mechanical ventilation (45% vs 18%, p = 0.001), renal replacement therapy (42% vs 20%, p = 0.011), vasopressors (32% vs 12%, p = 0.004) and a higher mortality (19% vs 5%, p = 0.010).ConclusionBlood stream infections are frequent in patients receiving TPE in the ICU, and are associated with a severe ICU course. Vigilant monitoring is crucial particularly for patients receiving a high number of TPE sessions.

Comparison of outcomes from tunnelled femorally inserted central catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters: a propensity score-matched cohort study

ObjectivesTo compare catheter-related outcomes of individuals who received a tunnelled femorally inserted central catheter (tFICC) with those who received a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in the upper extremities.DesignA propensity-score...

Management of catheter-related upper extremity deep vein thrombosis in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundPatients with cancer commonly require a central venous catheter, which is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Despite the frequent occurrence, the optimal anticoagulation management and outcomes for patients with cancer and catheter-related upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) are unclear. ObjectiveWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the rates of recurrent VTE and bleeding in patients with cancer and catheter-related upper extremity DVT. MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and CENTRAL from inception to June 2, 2023. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent VTE, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. The incidence rates (with 95% CI) of outcomes were pooled using random effects model. ResultsWe included 29 studies (N = 2,836), among which 5 were prospective. The duration of follow-up and anticoagulation varied considerably. The main long-term anticoagulant used was low molecular weight heparin, followed by direct oral anticoagulants. The pooled 3-month recurrent VTE rate from 14 studies (N = 1,128) was 0.56% (95% CI, 0.10%-3.01%; I2 = 0%). The pooled 3-month major bleeding rate from 10 studies (N = 834) was 2.34% (95% CI, 1.14%-4.76%; I2 = 0%). We were unable to pool event rates beyond 3 months, given high heterogeneity. All studies had serious risk of bias. ConclusionsOur study demonstrated a relatively low rate of recurrent VTE and moderate rate of major bleeding events within the first 3 months in patients with cancer and catheter-related upper extremity DVT. However, there was significant heterogeneity in the management and reporting after 3 months.

A Survey of Clinician Perspectives on the Management of Catheter-Related Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Cancer

Background: Central venous catheters (CVCs) are commonly used in cancer patients to facilitate blood draws, administration of chemotherapy or other supportive care treatment. Catheter-related upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a major complication of CVCs, with studies reporting a rate of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) of 7% over 3 months in patients with active cancer and a new CVC. Despite the frequent occurrence, the optimal management in patients with cancer and catheter-related upper extremity DVT is unclear, given the lack of high-quality data. Objective: We conducted a survey aiming to characterize practice patterns and perceptions of clinicians who treat patients with cancer and catheter-related upper extremity DVT. Methods: An online survey was distributed to international clinicians who manage patients with cancer and catheter-related upper extremity DVT. The survey explored the type and duration of anticoagulation, focusing on the management after the initial 3 months of anticoagulation, as well as treatment strategies upon catheter removal and interests in future clinical studies. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize survey responses. Results: The survey was generated on LimeSurvey ® in English and publicized by Twitter ® and email communications via multiple international organizations of hematologists, oncologists, and/or thrombosis specialists, including the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), Thrombosis Canada, the Canadian Venous Thromboembolism Research Network (CanVECTOR), and more. As of July 30, 2023, 115 clinicians from 26 countries had completed the survey. The majority of the respondents specialized in thrombosis (N=72, 62.6%) and/or hematology (N=60, 52.2%), followed by internal medicine (N=38, 33.0%) and oncology (N=14, 12.2%) (multiple selection was permitted for this question). For the initial management of a patient without unresected gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) cancer, thrombocytopenia, or relevant drug-drug interactions, 75% of clinicians would prescribe a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and 25% would give low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). On the other hand, in patients with unresected GI/GU cancer, the majority (N=105, 91.3%) of respondents chose to initiate LMWH. After the initial 3 months of anticoagulation, if the CVC remains in place in a patient with active cancer, the majority (N=112/114, 98.2%) of clinicians would continue anticoagulation, but with variable doses (57% and 43% chose therapeutic and prophylactic dosing, respectively). If the CVC remains in place but the cancer is in remission, fewer (70%) respondents would continue anticoagulation, and more would continue prophylactic as compared to therapeutic dosing (73% vs. 27%) in this setting. Practice variation further increases upon catheter removal, especially in the presence of active cancer (Figures 1 and 2). The majority of respondents (N=111, 96.5%) agree that there is a need for prospective studies to evaluate the management of patients with cancer and catheter-related upper extremity DVT, and over 91% (N=105) would consider enrolling their patients in a study to evaluate prophylactic dosing of anticoagulation for secondary prevention of VTE in patients with cancer and catheter-related upper extremity DVT. To help plan such a study, we evaluated respondents' perception on the maximal “tolerable” recurrent VTE rate between 3 and 6 months (as the main interest is in the management strategy after the initial 3 months), and 2% and 3% were the most common responses (41.2% and 31.6% of the respondents, respectively). Conclusions: Our survey demonstrates that current practice in managing patients with cancer and catheter-related upper extremity DVT is heterogenous, especially after the initial 3 months of anticoagulation and upon catheter removal. Well-conducted prospective studies in this population are needed, which is supported by most clinicians.

Management of Catheter-Related Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Patients with cancer commonly require a central venous catheter (CVC) for delivery of cancer therapies and/or supportive care. The presence of a CVC is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Despite the frequent occurrence, the optimal anticoagulation management and outcomes for patients with cancer and catheter-related upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) are unclear. Objective: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the rates of recurrent VTE and bleeding complications in patients with cancer and catheter-related upper extremity DVT. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and CENTRAL (Cochrane) from inception to June 2, 2023. We aimed to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (if any), prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and case-control studies (including ≥ 10 patients) evaluating adult patients with cancer and catheter-related upper extremity DVT. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent VTE, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding as defined by individual studies. Secondary outcomes included clinically relevant non-major bleeding, total bleeding events, and all-cause mortality. By using R software (version 4.0.3), the incidence rates (with 95% confidence interval [CI]) of recurrent VTE and bleeding outcomes at different time points were pooled using random effects model. Results: After screening 4,264 records, we included 29 studies (N=2,848 patients) in the systematic review. There were no RCTs, 5 prospective cohort studies (including 260 patients), and 24 retrospective cohort studies. Most studies had modest sample size (N<100). Overall from 24 studies with reported tumor types, the most common malignancy was hematological malignancy (50.4%), followed by gastrointestinal (13.6%), breast (10.2%), and lung (5.5%) cancers. The median or mean follow-up duration varied widely from 1 to 20 months. Duration of anticoagulation also varied considerably with median or mean duration of 20 days to 6 months. The main long-term anticoagulant used was low-molecular-weight heparin (58.1%), followed by direct oral anticoagulants (24.3%). Only two studies (N=87 patients) specifically reported the management and associated outcomes after catheter removal. Thirteen studies (N=1105 patients) reported a 3-month recurrent VTE rate, with the pooled rate of 1% (95% CI 0-3%, I 2 = 0%) (Figure 1). Nine studies (N=811 patients) reported a 3-month major bleeding rate, with the pooled rate of 2% (95% CI 1-5%, I 2 = 0%) (Figure 2). We were unable to pool event rates beyond 3 months given high degree of heterogeneity in the follow-up duration, bleeding definition, and duration of anticoagulation. Conclusions: Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated relatively low rates of recurrent VTE and major bleeding events within the first 3 months in patients with cancer and catheter-related upper extremity DVT. However, there was significant heterogeneity in the management and reporting after 3 months, and available data are poor to guide treatment strategies and duration of anticoagulation. The optimal management after catheter removal was also unclear. Future large prospective studies are needed.

Eltrombopag plus cyclosporine in refractory immune thrombocytopenia: a single-center study

BackgroundWith the development of thrombopoietin receptor agonists, the prognosis of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in patients in whom there was a poor response to first-line treatment has greatly improved. However, there are still some patients who are refractory to eltrombopag. ObjectivesTo explore the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag combined with low-dose cyclosporine in the management of patients with refractory ITP. MethodsA total of 21 participants with ITP who failed to respond to multiple lines of therapy (including a daily dose of 75 mg of eltrombopag for at least 30 days) treated at The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University between January 2018 and August 2022 were included. All enrolled patients subsequently received 50 mg of eltrombopag daily and low-dose cyclosporine (3 mg/kg/d, with an initial target concentration of 75-120 ng/mL). The efficacy and safety of the combined therapies were evaluated. ResultsA total of 76.2% (16/21) of the patients responded to the combination of cyclosporine and eltrombopag, with a median time to response of 14.5 (range, 5-37) days. A complete response (platelet count ≥ 100 × 109/L) was observed in 81.3% (13/16) of the patients, among whom 1 patient experienced relapse due to self-reduction in eltrombopag. During a median follow-up of 180 days, there were no relapses, and 70% (7/10) of the patients successfully stopped or decreased concomitant ITP medications. One patient had both a catheter-related deep vein thrombosis and a venous cerebral thrombotic event later; no other severe drug-related adverse events were observed. ConclusionCombining low-dose cyclosporine with eltrombopag may be an effective alternative for multirefractory ITP that is nonresponsive to eltrombopag alone.

A 5-year experience with midline catheters in the management of major head and neck surgery patients.

In the perioperative management of major head and neck surgery (HNS) patients, the performance of midline catheters (MCs) has been never tested. We present here our 5-year experience by reporting MC-related complications and by identifying the preoperative risk factors associated with their development. Clinical variables were extracted and the dwell time, the number, and the type of postprocedural complications of MCs were retrieved. Complications were classified into major (needing MCs removal and including catheter-related bloodstream infection or deep vein thrombosis or catheter occlusion) and into minor (accidental dislodgement, leaking, etc.). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were used in order to identify the predictors of complications. A total of 265 patients were included, with a mean age of 67.4 years. Intraprocedural complications occurred in 1.1% of cases, while postprocedural complications occurred in 13.9% of cases (12.05/1000 days), but they were minor in more than 7.0% (5.4/1000 catheter-days). There were 19 minor complications (7.1% or 5.4/1000 catheter-days) while 18 (7%, 5.1/1000 catheter-days) patients experienced at least one major complication. Female sex (OR = 1.963, 95% CI 1.017-3.792), insertion in the right arm (OR = 2.473, 95% CI 1.150-5.318), and an ACE-27 score >1 (OR = 2.573, 95% CI 1.295-5.110) were independent predictors of major complications. MCs appear to represent an effective option in the setting of major HNS. The identification of patients most at risk for MC-related complications should prompt a postoperative watchful evaluation.

Central venous catheter related Superior Vena Cava Syndrome after renal transplantation in two cases

Vena cava superior syndrome is a specific clinical disease; very important obstruction of the large central veins. Catheter-related deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and vena cava superior (VCS) syndrome are rare but serious complications that require specific care in these selected renal transplant recipient. Thrombosis formation, is a major complication of central venous catheter (CVC) attempts, however, arterial puncture, hematoma, and pneumothorax are more common complications. Mechanical complications of (CVC) have been reported in 5% to 19%. Incidences of CVC thrombosis have been reported in up to 66% of patients in venographic studies, however; VCS syndrome is a rare complication. After evaluating the catheter-related thrombosis risk, hemodialysis catheters were found to be the highest risk in comparison with other catheters. Catheter-related DVT and VCS syndrome are rare but serious complications require specific care in these renal transplant recipients. We report two cases of vena cava superior syndrome due to CVC thrombosis after kidney transplantation in two chronic renal disease patients with histories of previous catheter thrombosis.

Patterns, appropriateness and outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheter use in Brazil: a multicentre study of 12 725 catheters

BackgroundLittle is known about peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) use, appropriateness and device outcomes in Brazil.MethodsWe conducted an observational, prospective, cohort study spanning 16 Brazilian hospitals from October 2018 to...

Venous Thromboembolism Is Associated with Inferior Survival after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant

IntroductionVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication of both solid and hematologic malignancies. Risk factors for VTE and standard recommendations for prevention and treatment primarily pertain to solid tumor patients. There are fewer data in patients who have undergone allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Therefore, we studied the incidence, risk factors, and impact of VTE on post-HCT outcomes.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 431 patients who underwent allogeneic HCT between 1/2014 and 8/2019 to identify patients with VTE. VTE was estimated with cumulative incidence methods. Risk factors for VTE were identified with Fine and Gray regression and results are reported as hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). An apriori list of potential risk factors for VTE included age, gender, race, performance status, co-morbidity index, number of prior chemotherapy regimens, history of VTE, disease risk, donor/graft source, transplant conditioning regimen, and acute or chronic graft vs. host disease (GVHD). VTE was analyzed as a time-dependent covariate relative to other post-HCT outcomes.ResultsPatient characteristics are shown in the Table. The median age at time of transplant was 59 years, (range 18-76); 55.5% were male, the majority (90.7%) were White. The most common indication for transplant was acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (70.3%). Within our cohort, 64 patients (14.8%) developed VTE after allogeneic HCT. The cumulative incidence of VTE at 1 year was 9% (CI 7-12%). Median time to VTE was 9.8 months (range 0.7-74.0) (Figure). Thrombosis site breakdown included the following: lower deep vein thrombosis (DVT) n=47 (74%), catheter related DVT n=12 (19%), DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE) n=12 (19%), PE alone n=4 (6%). Patients were most commonly treated with a direct oral anticoagulant (n=27, 42%), followed by enoxaparin (n=15, 23.4%). The majority of patients (n=38, 58%) were treated with anticoagulation for more than 6 months. Six (9.4%) patients had recurrent thrombosis after completion of anticoagulation therapy from the time of transplant until last known follow-up. Only 9 (14%) had an inferior vena cava filter placed due to contraindications for anticoagulation. In patients treated with anticoagulation, there was a low overall incidence of clinically significant bleeding (n=3, 5%). In multivariable analysis, age (HR 1.36 per 10-year increase, CI 1.09-1.70, P=0.006), history of VTE (HR 1.95, CI 1.09-3.48, P=0.024), and grade 2-4 acute GVHD (HR 1.75, CI 1.05-2.94, P=0.033) were significantly associated with VTE. VTE was not associated with relapse mortality (HR 0.95, CI 0.44-2.04, P=0.89), however VTE was significantly associated with an increased risk of non VTE-associated non-relapse mortality (NRM) (HR 4.09, CI 2.47-6.74, P<0.001) and decreased overall survival (OS) (HR 2.19, CI 1.48-3.24, P<0.001).DiscussionVTE is an important complication after allogeneic HCT and is associated with significantly increased NRM and inferior OS. Older patients, those with a prior history of VTE, and patients with acute GVHD are at increased risk for development of VTE after HCT. We found an overall low risk of bleeding with anticoagulation and further study to investigate the role of prophylaxis in this high-risk cohort is needed. [Display omitted] DisclosuresSobecks: CareDX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Majhail: Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Anthem, Inc: Consultancy. Angelini: Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hamilton: Syndax: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Equilium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Clinical Benefit Of Anticoagulation In Treatment Of Catheter-Related Deep Vein Thrombosis In Patients With Acute Leukemia

BackgroundCentral venous catheters, including peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC), are commonly used during the treatment course of patients (pts) with acute leukemia for the administration of vesicant chemotherapy, infusions, transfusions and blood draws. These catheters increase the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the upper extremities and of pulmonary embolism (PE). Anticoagulation therapy (AC) in leukemia pts may be used to treat these thrombotic events. However, pts with this approach may incur an increased risk of bleeding, especially in those with thrombocytopenia. Hence, the benefit versus risk of AC therapy of PICC line-related DVT in pts with acute leukemia is controversial, and there are currently no available guidelines. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine benefits and risks of AC for PICC line-related DVT in leukemia pts. MethodsCharts of 37 pts with acute leukemia who developed PICC line-associated DVT at the University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center between 2008 and 2012 were reviewed. Of these, 22 received AC prior to discharge (treatment group) and 15 did not (control group). Of the 22, 20 pts received low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) enoxaparin, low-dose (0.5-0.75 mg/Kg/d) in 7 and high-dose (1.5 mg/Kg/d or 1mg/Kg/bid) in 13. Two pts received fondaparinux and were excluded from analysis, leaving 35 pts. Pts with platelet counts less than 50×103/microL received platelet transfusions to decrease bleeding risk associated with AC. DVT improvement was documented by symptom resolution and/or by imaging. Statistical analyses included Fisher's exact tests, Mann-Whitney U-tests, Kaplan-Meier curves and associated log-rank tests, and Cox Regression Models where appropriate. ResultsPts and disease characteristics are shown in Table 1 by treatment group. Median follow-up duration was 6 months (range, 0-60 months). DVT developed by 18 days after catheter insertion in 50% of the pts. Status of DVT improvement was known in 30 pts, but missing in 5. In the treatment group, 17 out of 19 (90%) had DVT improvement, compared to 5 out of 11 (45%) in the control group (p = 0.03). Bleeding (non-fatal) occurred in 5 out of 20 (25%) pts in the treatment group, compared to 1 out of 15 (7%) in the control group (p = 0.21). Surviving pts at last follow-up were 14 out of 20 (70%) in the treatment groups and 4 out of 15 (27%) in the control group (p = 0.02). Median survival was not reached in the treatment group but was 9 months in the control group. Kaplan-Meier curve (Figure 1) showed a complete and widening separation in favor of treatment, with a log-rank p-value of 0.02. Unadjusted cox regression models showed a hazard ratio (95% CI) of 0.33 (0.12 – 0.91) in favor of treatment. Adjustment for age, gender, leukemia type, or karyotype did not materially change the results. [Display omitted] ConclusionsThese observations suggest that acute leukemia pts with catheter-related DVTs may benefit from anticoagulation with platelet transfusion support, and from continuation of therapy after hospital discharge. These findings, although novel, are based on a small number of individuals in a retrospective study. A future prospective study with a larger sample size would be beneficial to confirm these findings. Disclosures:No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with non-hematological cancer admitted for COVID-19 at a third-level hospital in Madrid.

An increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 has been reported. We aimed to describe the incidence rate of VTE on patients with non-hematological cancer who required hospitalization due to COVID-19 at our center. In this prospective study, non-hematological cancer patients hospitalized for confirmed COVID-19 at our institution from 1st March to 30th April 2020, were evaluated daily for VTE complications during their hospital stay, and after discharge until 30th June 2020. Furthermore, Doppler ultrasound of lower limbs was routinely performed in asymptomatic patients based on D-dimer levels and current active cancer therapy. The primary outcome of this study was the cumulative incidence of VTE. Secondary outcomes were the cumulative incidence of bleeding and mortality. A total of 58 hospitalized non-hematological cancer patients and confirmed COVID-19 were identified. Median follow-up since initial symptoms of COVID-19 was 91 days (IQR 19–104). Pulmonary embolism was diagnosed in three (5%) patients. Symptomatic catheter-related deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was observed in one patient. Doppler ultrasound of lower limbs was done in 11 asymptomatic patients, showing distal DVT in two of them (18%). The cumulative incidence of VTE on day 14 after admission was 10%, without new VTE events after hospital discharge and up to 90 days follow-up. No bleeding complication was observed. Seventeen patients (29%) died in the first 14 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. Four patients died after discharge due to malignancy progression. The cumulative incidence of VTE in non-hematological cancer patients under active treatment was 10% at day 14 after admission, with no further new events in the following 12 weeks.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11239-021-02448-w.

Catheter-related deep vein thrombosis in newborn infants.

In neonatology, more than 90 % of deep vein thromboses are related to catheter use. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors associated with central venous catheter-related deep vein thrombosis. Observational and analytical study conducted in a prospective cohort. All central venous catheters were included using consecutive, non-random sampling. The screening protocol included a daily clinical examination and a Doppler ultrasound (7-10 days after insertion and/or 72 h after removal). Follow-up: from catheter insertion to catheter removal, death or patient counter-referral. The incidence density rate per 1000 catheter-days was estimated with its corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs), and risk factors, using Cox multivariate analysis. Thrombosis was identified in 22/264 catheters. The incidence density rate of thrombosis was 5.33 ‰ catheter-days (95 % CI: 3.34-8.07). Cardiovascular surgery and and the use of central catheters others than peripherally inserted ones, were independent risk factors for thrombosis (hazard ratio: 3.8 [95 % CI: 1.6-9] and 2.75 [95 % CI: 1.17-6.45]). The incidence of central venous catheter-related deep vein thrombosis was 5.33 per 1000 catheter-days. A history of cardiovascular surgical procedures and and the use of central catheters others than peripherally inserted ones, were associated with a higher risk of this complication.

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Thrombosis After Placement via Electrocardiography vs Traditional Methods

BackgroundPeripherally inserted central catheter tip placement at the cavoatrial junction is associated with reduced catheter-related deep vein thrombosis. Electrocardiographic tip confirmation purportedly improves accuracy of tip placement, but whether this approach can reduce deep vein thrombosis is unknown. MethodsProspectively collected data from patients that received peripherally inserted central catheters at 52 Michigan hospitals were analyzed. The method used to confirm tip confirmation at insertion and deep vein thrombosis outcomes were extracted from medical records. Multivariate models (accounting for the clustered nature of the data) were fitted to assess the association between peripherally inserted central catheter-related deep vein thrombosis and method of tip confirmation (electrocardiographic vs radiographic imaging). ResultsA total of 42,687 peripherally inserted central catheters (21,098 radiology vs 21,589 electrocardiographic) were included. Patients receiving electrocardiographic-confirmed peripherally inserted central catheters had fewer comorbidities compared with those that underwent placement via radiology. Overall, deep vein thrombosis occurred in 594 (1.3%) of all peripherally inserted central catheters. Larger catheter size (odds radio [OR] 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.90 per unit increase in gauge), history of deep vein thrombosis, and cancer were associated with increased risk of deep vein thrombosis (OR 2.00; 95% CI, 1.65-2.43 and OR 1.62; 95% CI, 1.16-2.26, respectively) using logistic regression. Following adjustment, electrocardiographic guidance was associated with a significant reduction in peripherally inserted central catheter-related deep vein thrombosis compared with radiographic imaging (OR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58-0.93; P = .0098). ConclusionThe use of electrocardiography to confirm peripherally inserted central catheter tip placement at the cavoatrial junction was associated with significantly fewer deep vein thrombosis events than radiographic imaging. Use of this approach for peripherally inserted central catheter insertion may help improve patient safety, particularly in high-risk patients.

Venous Thromboembolism Events Following Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Based on CT Scans.

Objectives:The main objective of the study was to determine the prevalence of venous thromboembolism events in patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The secondary objective was to compare venous thromboembolism events and coagulation variables in patients requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation according to the pathogen.Design:Retrospective observational analysis at a single center.Setting:Tertiary referral university teaching hospital.Patients:Patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-related severe acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy with an injected CT scan performed after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation retrieval.Interventions:None.Measurements and Main Results:We included 13 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 patients requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. All of these patients experienced venous thromboembolism: 10 patients (76.9%) had isolated cannula-associated deep vein thrombosis, two patients (15.4%) had isolated pulmonary embolism, and one patient (7.7%) had both cannula-associated deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Eleven patients (84.6%) had cannula-associated deep vein thrombosis. A jugular associated cannula-associated deep vein thrombosis was identified in seven patients (53.8%), a femoral associated cannula-associated deep vein thrombosis was identified in 10 patients (76.9%), and six patients (46.2%) had both femoral and jugular cannula-associated deep vein thrombosis. A pulmonary embolism was found in three patients (23.1%). No patient had central venous catheter-related deep vein thrombosis. One patient had thrombotic occlusion of the centrifugal pump, and one had oxygenator thrombosis requiring circuit replacement. Three patients (23.1%) had significant bleeding. Three patients (23.1%) had laboratory-confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and all of them developed cannula-associated deep vein thrombosis. These three patients had femoral cannula-associated deep vein thrombosis, and two had an oxygenator or pump thrombosis. The mean activated partial thromboplastin time ratio was higher in the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 group than in the influenza group and the community-acquired pneumonia group (1.91 vs 1.48 vs 1.53; p = 0.001), which was also found in regard to the percentage of patients with an activated partial thromboplastin time ratio greater than 1.8 (47.8% vs 20% vs 20.9%; p = 0.003) and the mean prothrombin ratio (86.3 vs 61.6 vs 67.1; p = 0.003). There was no difference in baseline characteristics or venous thromboembolism events.Conclusions:We report a 100% occurrence of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients supported by venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-related acute respiratory distress syndrome using CT scan imaging despite a high target and close monitoring of anticoagulation.

Incidence of and risk factors for totally implantable vascular access device complications in patients with gastric cancer: A retrospective analysis.

Totally implantable vascular access devices (TIVADs) are often used to administer chemotherapy by prolonged intravenous infusion. The objective of the present study was to investigate the incidence of long-term complications and identify risk factors associated with TIVAD placement in patients with gastric cancer. A total of 121 patients with gastric cancer who had undergone 150 TIVAD placement procedures for chemotherapy or supportive care were enrolled in the present retrospective cohort study. A number of risk factors were analyzed, including age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, history of thrombosis, body mass index, disease stage, and site and purpose of TIVAD. In total, 40 TIVADs (26.7%) developed long-term complications, of which 27 (18.0%) were infections, seven (4.7%) were catheter-related deep vein thrombosis (CR-DVT), and six (4.0%) were obstructions. Chemotherapy was associated with an increased rate of infectious adverse events (odds ratio 2.925; 95% CI, 1.104–7.750; P=0.031) according to the multivariate analysis. CR-DVT occurred more frequently in upper arm ports than in chest wall ports; however, this difference was not statistically significant (7.5 vs. 0.0%; P=0.084) according to the univariable analysis. All CR-DVTs developed in the upper arm sites. Chemotherapy and the upper arm site were associated with long-term complications in patients with TIVAD. However, further studies are needed to confirm the findings of the present study and to determine the reasons for the high incidence of long-term complications in these patients.

Central Venous Catheter-Related Deep Vein Thrombosis in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit

BackgroundCentral venous catheter (CVC) use is common in the management of critically ill children, especially those with congenital heart disease. CVCs are known to augment the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), but data on CVC-associated DVTs in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) are limited. In this study, we aim to identify the incidence of and risk factors for CVC-related DVT in this high-risk population, as its complications are highly morbid. Materials and methodsThe PC4 database and a radiologic imaging database were retrospectively reviewed for the demographics and outcomes of patients admitted to the Texas Children's Hospital CICU requiring CVC placement, as well as the incidence of DVT and its complications. ResultsBetween January 2017 and December 2017, 1215 central lines were placed over 851 admissions. DVT was diagnosed in 8% of admissions with a CVC, 29% of which demonstrated thrombus in the inferior vena cava. The risk factors significantly associated with DVT included the presence of >1 line, higher total line hours, longer intubation times, and extended CICU stay. A diagnosis of low cardiac output syndrome, sepsis, central line–associated bloodstream infection, and cardiac catheterization were also significant risk factors. Interestingly, cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass appeared to be protective of clot development. DVT was a highly significant risk factor for mortality in these patients. ConclusionsCVC-related DVTs in critically ill children with congenital heart disease are associated with higher risks of morbidity and mortality, highlighting the need for well-designed studies to determine the best preventative and treatment strategies and to establish guidelines for appropriate monitoring and follow-up of these patients.

Can thrombophilia predict recurrent catheter-related deep vein thrombosis in children?

AbstractThe role of thrombophilia testing in predicting catheter-related deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after an incident (ie, first) catheter-related DVT in children remains unclear. The present study investigated the association between thrombophilia and recurrent catheter-related DVT. Children with thrombophilia testing, performed according to the clinician's judgment and the family's preference, and a history of objectively confirmed catheter-related DVT were included in the study. Recurrent catheter-related DVT after placement of a new catheter was the main outcome. Thrombophilia was classified as minor, major, or none. Analysis was conducted using mixed effect logistic regression. A total of 245 patients had 1,365 catheters inserted; 941 of these catheters were placed after the incident catheter-related DVT. Anticoagulants as treatment or prophylaxis were administered in 78.1% of inserted catheters for at least 50% of the time they were in place. Minor thrombophilia was found in 12.7% of patients, whereas major thrombophilia was seen in 8.2% of children. The incidence rate of recurrent events was 0.23/100 catheter-days (95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.28 catheter-days); 34.3% (95% confidence interval, 28.6%-40.0%) of patients requiring a new catheter after their incident thrombotic event had at least 1 recurrent event. The incidence proportion of bleeding complications was 4.6/100 patients receiving anticoagulation. Young age of the patient at the time of catheter insertion and lack of administration of treatment or prophylactic doses of anticoagulant were predictive of recurrent events. In contrast, thrombophilia was not predictive of recurrent catheter-related DVT during subsequent catheter insertions among tested patients. Our findings suggest that thrombophilia testing to predict recurrence in these patients may be unnecessary.