Catheter Placement In Patients Research Articles

Central venous accesses in prone position during the pandemic period: A narrative review.

The unprecedented challenges posed by the global COVID-19 pandemic have magnified the significance of managing intensive care patients in prone positions, particularly those requiring mechanical ventilation. Central venous access is crucial for delivering essential therapies to patients, particularly in intensive care settings. However, the shift in patient management during the pandemic, necessitating prone positioning for improved oxygenation, presented unique hurdles in maintaining and establishing central venous access. Before the pandemic, scant literature detailed the insertion of vascular access devices in prone or unconventional positions. Limited case reports and letters highlighted the feasibility of procedures like ultrasound-guided central catheter placement in patients undergoing surgery or with specific clinical needs. During the pandemic, a surge in case reports and series illuminated the complexities faced by clinicians in maintaining vascular access during pronation procedures. These reports delineated critical scenarios, ranging from rapid clinical deterioration necessitating immediate interventions to challenges with vascular access device (VAD) malfunctions or misplacements during prone maneuvers. Patient selection and device types emerged as critical considerations. Various scenarios, including patients transitioning to prone position from non-invasive ventilation and those requiring additional access for therapies like dialysis, posed challenges in device selection and placement. Successful VAD insertion techniques in prone patients encompassed multiple anatomical sites, including the internal jugular, brachial, femoral, and popliteal veins. However, challenges persisted, particularly with respect to anatomical variations and technical complexities in cannulation. Further research, standardized protocols, and randomized studies are needed to refine and validate the proposed strategies in both pandemic and non-pandemic settings.

Risk factors for medical adhesive-related skin injury at the site of peripherally inserted central venous catheter placement in patients with cancer: a single-centre prospective study from China

ObjectivesThis study aims to explore the incidence of, and risk factors for medical adhesive-related skin injury (MARSI) at peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) sites in patients with cancer.DesignA prospective...

Comparison of supraclavicular brachiocephalic and femoral vein approaches for tunneled dialysis catheter placement in patients with thrombosed internal jugular veins.

There is still debate on the best access route in case of bilateral internal jugular vein thrombosis. We aimed to compare the safety, effectiveness, and outcomes of tunneled dialysis catheter placement via supraclavicular brachiocephalic and femoral vein approaches in patients with bilateral internal jugular vein thrombosis. Between January 2018 and December 2021, data of the patients in whom tunneled dialysis catheters were placed via the supraclavicular brachiocephalic vein (n = 42) and femoral vein (n = 57) approaches were extracted. Patient demographics, technical and clinical success rates, complications, and outcomes were noted. The Likert scale was used to assess patient satisfaction. Forty two (42.4%) patients were men, and the mean age was 61.9 (range, 12-93) years. The technical and clinical success rate was 100% for both groups. No major complication was encountered. The mean follow-up period was 497.5 (range, 32-1698) catheter days. Thirty-day patency was similar for the brachiocephalic vein and femoral vein group (40 [95.2%] vs. 55 [96.5%], p = 0.754). Also, primary and cumulative patency rates were comparable (p = 0.158; p = 0.660). The infection rate was 2.6 and 4.1 per 1000 catheter days for the brachiocephalic vein and femoral vein group. The infection-free survival was significantly higher in the brachiocephalic vein group (71.9% vs. 35.3% at 12 months, p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was higher in the brachiocephalic vein group (median satisfaction, 5 vs. 4, p < 0.001). Both supraclavicular brachiocephalic vein and femoral vein approaches have high technical and clinical success with comparable patency rates. However, low infection rate and high patient satisfaction make the supraclavicular brachiocephalic vein approach a reasonable alternative before proceeding to the femoral vein access.

Modified Single Port Laparoscopic Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion - Initial Experience and Outcome from a Tertiary Care Centre

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are emerging as a major health related issues in developing countries. The increasing numbers require rapid adaptation of existing health-care policies. The number of patients requiring renal care is only bound to increase in coming years with the increasing incidence and prevalence of diabetes. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) catheter placement is performed on end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. There is abundant literature regarding post-operative outcomes and re-operative rates following CAPD. We report our initial experience of modified single port laparoscopic technique of placing CAPD catheters using a single port through the Palmer’s point and discuss our surgical outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective review (2019-2020) of patients undergoing CAPD catheter placement at SMVD Narayana Superspecialty Hospital. Outcome analysis focused on patient related outcomes, including early (&lt; 30 days) versus late (≥ 30 days) complication and re-operation rates. Results: A total of 30 patients with ESRD, (mean ASA score = 3.3) were included in the study who underwent modified single port laparoscopic (n = 30) CAPD catheter placement (mean follow-up = 180 days). The total complication rate with the procedure was 43%, with re-operation rate of 20%. CAPD catheter non-function occurred in 06 patients (20% of total). CAPD catheter migrations occurred in 03 patients (10% of total). CAPD catheter related infections occurred in 05 patients (16% of total), and 02 required re-operation; 03 patients were treated successfully with culture directed antibiotics. There were 2 deaths during the study period, one due to peritonitis and other due to underlying cardiac disease. There was no surgical mortality in the study group. Conclusion: Although CAPD catheter placement in patients with ESRD are technically un-complicated to accomplish, long term results suggest as many as one in three patients will struggle with some form of catheter malfunction or infection. Our modified technique and the results have led to changes in our CAPD catheter placement technique, as well as the post-operative patient care algorithm.

Impact of tumor contact surface area on collecting system entry in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a retrospective analysis

BackgroundCollecting system entry in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy may occur even in cases showing a low N factor in the R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score. Therefore, in this study, we focused on the tumor contact surface area with the adjacent renal parenchyma and attempted to construct a novel predictive model for collecting system entry.MethodsAmong 190 patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy at our institution from 2015 to 2021, 94 patients with a low N factor (1–2) were analyzed. Contact surface was measured with three-dimensional imaging software and defined as the C factor, classified as C1, < 10 cm [2]; C2, ≥ 10 and < 15 cm [2]; and C3: ≥ 15 cm [2]. Additionally, a modified R factor (mR) was classified as mR1, < 20 mm; mR2, ≥ 20 and < 40 mm; and mR3, ≥ 40 mm. We discussed the factors influencing collecting system entry, including the C factor, and created a novel collecting system entry predictive model.ResultsCollecting system entry was observed in 32 patients with a low N factor (34%). The C factor was the only independent predictive factor for collecting system entry in multivariate regression analysis (odds ratio: 4.195, 95% CI: 2.160–8.146, p < 0.0001). Models including the C factor showed better discriminative power than the models without the C factor.ConclusionsThe new predictive model, including the C factor in N1-2 cases, may be beneficial, considering its indication for preoperative ureteral catheter placement in patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

Intratumoral catheter placement in pediatric patients with diffuse midline gliomas.

Diffuse midline brainstem gliomas have a poor prognosis and are generally not amenable to surgical resection. Occasionally, palliative surgical procedures can be performed to improve the quality of life of these patients. We describe three patients with solid-cystic brainstem gliomas in whom an Ommaya reservoir catheter was placed to reduce mass effect. To describe the characteristics, indications for, and operative technique of Ommaya reservoir catheter placement in patients with solid-cystic diffuse midline glioma. A review was conducted of the medical records of pediatric patients with solid-cystic diffuse midline glioma H3 K27-altered, treated with an Ommaya reservoir at Hospital J.P. Garrahan between 2014 and 2021 together with a search of the literature. Three cases of stereotaxic Ommaya placement in solid-cystic diffuse midline gliomas, H3 K27M-altered were identified. After the procedure, clinical improvement and reduction of the size of the tumor cyst size was achieved. No associated complications were seen. At the time of the study, one patient died, and the remaining two patients continued in follow-up at our hospital. We believe that the placement of an intratumoral Ommaya reservoir catheter may be considered a therapeutic option to improve symptoms and quality of life of selected patients with solid-cystic diffuse midline glioma.

Prophylactic platelet transfusion and risk of bleeding associated with ultrasound-guided central venous access in patients with severe thrombocytopenia.

Reported risk of bleeding complications after central catheter access in patients with thrombocytopenia is highly variable. Current guidelines recommend routine prophylactic platelet (PLT) transfusion before central venous catheter placement in patients with severe thrombocytopenia. Nevertheless, the strength of such recommendations is weak and supported by observational studies including few patients with very low PLT counts (<20 × 109 /L). This study aims to assess the risk of bleeding complications related to using or not using prophylactic PLT transfusion before ultrasound-guided central venous access in patients with very low PLT counts. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with very low PLT counts (<20 × 109 /L) subjected to ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization between January 2011 and November 2019 in a university hospital. Bleeding complications were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. A multivariate logistic regression was conducted to assess the risk of major and minor bleeding complications comparing patients who did or did not receive prophylactic PLT transfusion for the procedure. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to handle missing data. A two-tailed p< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Among 221 patients with very low PLT counts, 72 received prophylactic PLT transfusions while 149 did not. Baseline characteristics were similar between transfused and nontransfused patients. No major bleeding events were identified, while minor bleeding events were recognized in 35.7% of patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed no significant differences in bleeding complications between patients who received prophylactic PLT transfusions and those who did not (odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.45-1.55, p= 0.567). Additional complete case and sensitivity analyses yielded results similar to those of the main analysis. In this single-center retrospective cohort study of ultrasound-guided central venous access in patients with very low PLT counts, no major bleeding was identified, and prophylactic PLT transfusions did not significantly decrease minor bleeding events.

Supraclavicular Brachiocephalic Vein Access for Tunneled Dialysis Catheter Placement in Patients with Bilateral Internal Jugular Vein Thrombosis

Supraclavicular Brachiocephalic Vein Access for Tunneled Dialysis Catheter Placement in Patients with Bilateral Internal Jugular Vein Thrombosis

Comparison of catheter patency between surgical inside-out technique and conventional femoral approach for tunneled cuffed catheter placement in patients with thoracic central venous occlusion.

Femoral tunneled cuffed catheters (TCCs) can provide long-term hemodialysis access for patients with exhausted upper extremity access sites due to thoracic central venous occlusion. However, the use of femoral vein catheters (FVCs) has reportedly been associated with the risk of infection, malfunction, and discomfort. An inside-out technique will facilitate chest TCC placement by intentional retrograde extravascularization of the proximal occluded venous stump into the mediastinum. Next, the wire and small catheter are exteriorized to the skin at the base of the neck with a small skin incision. Then, the hemodialysis catheter is railed back down to the right atrium. With this technique, we placed the tip of the catheter into intrathoracic superior vena cava or brachiocephalic vein. In the present study, we compared the catheter patency of the inside-out technique vs a standard approach for FVC placement. The present randomized controlled trial was conducted from May to December 2020. We included 22 patients requiring long-term hemodialysis with failed recanalization of thoracic central venous occlusion. The patients were randomized into the surgical inside-out (S-inside-out) group and FVC group. The S-inside-out and FVC groups included 10 and 12 patients, respectively. All 22 patients had undergone successful catheter placement. Catheter survival function was significantly higher for the S-inside-out group than for the FVC group (100% vs 50%, respectively; P= .017). In addition, the EQ-5D utility score was significantly better for the S-inside-out group (P= .008). Four cases of catheter infection occurred in the FVC group, but no catheter infection was found in the S-inside-out group. Procedural-related complications occurred in two patients; one case each of hemothorax and stroke in the S-inside-out group. Use of the S-inside-out technique facilitated upper chest TCC placement for hemodialysis patients with exhausted access sites. This technique provided better catheter survival function, a better quality of life, and a lower infection rate, which outweighed the procedure risk.

Tunneled Uncuffed Pigtail Drainage Catheter Placement in Patients with Refractory Ascites or Pleural Effusion: A Single-Center Experience.

No evidence exists to support the use of tunneled non-cuffed pigtail drainage catheters in patients with refractory ascites or pleural effusion. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of non-cuffed tunneled pigtail drainage catheters in patients with refractory ascites or pleural effusions. Between October 5, 2020 and May 25, 2021, 34 pigtail catheters were implanted in 27 patients (17 males, 10 females; average age: 65.66 ± 12.04years) under either ultrasound or computed-tomography guidance (19 catheters for ascites, 15 catheters for pleural effusion). Twenty-eight catheters (82.35%) were implanted for malignant etiologies, and 6 catheters (17.65%) were implanted for benign etiologies. The catheters (size: 8-14 French) were implanted through a subcutaneous tunnel. Complication rate and factors related to complications were analyzed. Catheter lifetime was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier method. Patency ranged from 3 to 211days. None of the patients experienced a major complication (e.g., peritonitis and empyema). Meanwhile, 8 minor complications were observed including 3 catheter occlusion, 3 ascites leakage, 1 peri-catheter local skin infection, 1 peri-catheter local skin reaction. None of the etiologies were related to the catheter complications. However, the 8-F catheter was associated with a significantly higher complication rate (odds = 5.5, p = 0.044). The estimated mean [CI] dwelling time of a catheter was 59.18 [32.97, 85.39] days. Image-guided insertion of tunneled peritoneal or pleural pigtail external drainage catheters achieved with a 100% technical success rate and resulted in an acceptable complication rate and catheter lifetime for the management of refractory ascites or pleural effusion.

Contribution of Coagulopathy on the Risk of Bleeding After Central Venous Catheter Placement in Critically Ill Thrombocytopenic Patients.

Single-center retrospective cohort study. Academic mixed ICU in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Consecutive severely thrombocytopenic (platelet count ≤ 50 × 109/L) patients who underwent central venous catheter placement between February 2016 and February 2020. Central venous catheter placement in patients with both severe thrombocytopenia and severe coagulopathy (international normalized ratio > 1.5 and/or activated partial thromboplastin time > 45 s) versus patients with severe thrombocytopenia and normal or mildly prolonged international normalized ratio and activated partial thromboplastin time. We included 289 central venous catheter placements in 175 patients, 112 in patients with and 172 in patients without severe coagulopathy. Median (interquartile range) platelet count was 27 (16-38) and equal for both groups. There were 44 bleeding episodes at the central venous catheter insertion site (15.5%), of which four (1.4%) were grade 2 and two (0.7%) were grade 3. There were 19 bleeding episodes (17.0%) versus 25 bleeding episodes (14.5%) in the coagulopathy and noncoagulopathy groups, of which one and five were of grade 2 or higher, respectively. After correction for confounders, coagulopathy had no effect on bleeding: odds ratio (95% CI) 0.96 (0.24-3.88). Before central venous catheter placement, 116 (40.8%) patients received platelet transfusion. Bleeding at the central venous catheter insertion site occurred in 19 of 116 patients (16.4%) and 25 of 168 patients (14.9%) who did and did not receive platelet transfusion. After correction for confounders, platelet transfusion had no effect on bleeding: odds ratio (95% CI) 0.73 (0.18-2.83). Coagulopathy was not associated with an increased bleeding risk in severely thrombocytopenic ICU patients undergoing ultrasound guided central venous catheter placement. Prophylactic platelet transfusion in patients with severe thrombocytopenia was not associated with a reduced risk of bleeding.

Outcomes of Venoplasty-Assisted, Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement in Patients with Upper-Arm Venous Stenosis: Comparison with Midlines and Contralateral Placement

PurposeTo compare the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and peripherally inserted central catheter (PTA + PICC), contralateral PICC, and midline catheterization (MC) in patients with venous stenosis. Materials and MethodsA total of 7,327 PICC procedures were performed in 5,421 patients at a single institution between 2013 and 2019. Among them, 87 patients had upper-arm venous stenoses and were managed with PTA + PICC, contralateral PICC, or MC. Data on catheter-dwell time, clinical success rate, and adverse events were recorded. The procedure was considered to have clinically succeeded when a PICC was removed from the patient just before discharge or after the completion of therapy. Catheter survival time and the chance of adverse events were compared among the groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. ResultsPTA + PICC, contralateral PICC, and MC procedures were performed for 57 (65.5%, 57/87), 10 (11.5%, 10/87), and 20 (23.0%, 23/87) patients, respectively. The mean catheter-dwell time in the PTA + PICC, contralateral PICC, and MC groups was 49.7, 28.7, and 15.1 days, respectively, and the clinical success rate of each group was 86.0% (49/57), 80.0% (8/10), and 50.0% (10/20). The PTA + PICC group had a significantly longer catheter survival time than the MC group (P < .001). The chance of a catheter-related infection (P = .008) was significantly lower in the PTA + PICC group than in the MC group. ConclusionsPTA + PICC or contralateral PICC should be considered prior to ipsilateral MC when venous stenosis is encountered during PICC procedures.

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous transabdominal and transesophageal decompression gastric catheters for palliation of malignant bowel obstruction.

To evaluate the safety and primary technical success rate of gastric decompression via percutaneous transabdominal gastrostomy (PTAG) or percutaneous transesophageal gastric (PTEG) catheter placement for management of malignant bowel obstruction (MBO). A secondary purpose was to evaluate the safety and success rate for PTAG catheter placement in patients with both MBO and ascites. A single-institution retrospective review of 385 patients who underwent attempted decompression gastric catheter placement from March 2013 to August 2018 was performed. Medical records and imaging studies were reviewed. A subgroup of patients with concomitant MBO and ascites were identified. The primary outcome measures were procedural technical success and procedural complications. 394 decompression gastrostomy catheters were attempted from 2013 to 2018, n = 353 PTAG and n = 41 PTEG. The success rate was 95.5% (n = 337 of 353) for PTAG and 97.6% (n = 40 of 41) for PTEG. There were 63 total complications involving 47 (13.9%) patients following PTAG and 13 total complications involving 9 (22.5%) patients following PTEG, P = 0.16. For the subgroup of patients with MBO and ascites, the success rate was 94.8% (n = 182 of 192 patients), and there were 20 complications involving 17 (12.9%) of 132 patients. Gastric decompression for patients with MBO via PTAG or PTEG catheter placement is associated with high success rates and low complications.

Targeted nursing interventions for urine leakage after indwelling catheter placement in patients with cerebrovascular disease

Targeted nursing interventions for urine leakage after indwelling catheter placement in patients with cerebrovascular disease

Bedside Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter Placement in Patients with COVID-19

BackgroundCOVID-19, the syndrome caused by the novel SARS-CoV2, is associated with high rates of acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). It is well known that despite the ease of bedside insertion, the use of nontunneled dialysis catheters (NTDCs) is associated with increased complications compared to tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs). Our objective was to develop a strategy for TDC placement at the bedside to provide effective dialysis access, conserve resources and decrease personnel exposure at our medical center in an epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsA technique for bedside TDC insertion with ultrasound and plain radiographs in the intensive care unit was developed. Test or clinically COVID-19-positive patients requiring RRT were evaluated for bedside emergent NTDC or nonemergent TDC placement. Patients who underwent NTDC placement were monitored for ongoing RRT needs and were converted to TDC at the bedside after 3–5 days. We prospectively collected patient data focusing on complications and mortality.ResultsOf the 36 consultations for dialysis access in COVID-positive patients from March 19 through June 5, 2020, a total of 24 bedside TDCs were placed. Only one patient developed a complication, which was pneumothorax and cardiac tamponade during line placement. In-hospital mortality in the cohort was 63.9%.ConclusionsBedside TDC placement has served to conserve resources, prevent complications with transport to and from the operating room, and decrease personnel exposure during the COVID-19 pandemic. This strategy warrants further consideration and could be used in critically ill patients regardless of COVID status.

Lumbar Drains After Cardiac Surgery: Evidence-Based Solutions for Safe Management.

Lumbar Drains After Cardiac Surgery: Evidence-Based Solutions for Safe Management.

Indications and clinical outcomes of indwelling pleural catheter placement in patients with malignant pleural effusion in a cancer setting hospital

The placement of indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) is an effective outpatient approach for the management of malignant pleural effusions (MPE). The indications and outcome of IPC in patients with MPE. Risk stratifications, prevention and management of IPC-related complications. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients with MPE who underwent IPC insertion from July 2011 to July 2019. The multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify the independent risk factors associated with IPC infection and the Kaplan-Meier method to determine the overall survival. A total of 102 patients underwent IPC insertion during the stipulated period and the mean age was 50.49 ± 14.36 years. Seventy-one (69.6%) were females. The indications were Trap Lung in 38 (37.3%), failed talc pleurodesis in 28 (27.5%) and as a primary intervention in 36 (35.3%). The infection rate was 25.5%, of which 65.4% patients had nosocomial infections. Post-IPC overall median survival time was 9.0 ± 2.50 weeks with highest in patients with trap lung (18 ± 1.50 weeks). In multivariable analysis, following variables were identified as a significant independent risk factor for IPC infection: Multiloculated MPE (AOR 2.80; 95%CI (1.00-9.93), 0.04), trap lung (AOR 7.57; 95%CI (1.39-41.25), 0.01), febrile neutropenia (FN) (AOR 28.55; 95%CI (4.23-19.74), 0.001), IPC domiciliary education (AOR 0.18; 95%CI (0.05-0.66), 0.001) and length of hospital stay (AOR 1.16; 95%CI (1.01-1.33), 0.03). IPC insertion is an effective management for MPE with reasonable survival benefits. Infection is the most common complication, of which mostly are nosocomial infections with higher incidence in multiloculated effusions, trap lung, FN and with lack of domiciliary IPC care education.

The Role of Mastoidectomy in Draining Ventilation Tubes.

To discuss the indication for performing a mastoidectomy with catheter placement in patients with chronic tympanostomy tube otorrhea. The Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online was searched via PubMed for relevant articles using serous mastoiditis, mastoidectomy, chronic otorrhea, tube otorrhea, tympanostomy tubes, and biofilm as keywords. Further understanding of the pathophysiology of otorrhea and the development of ototopical fluoroquinolones have made a draining tympanostomy tube more manageable. Nevertheless, chronic otorrhea refractory to an otolaryngologist's traditional treatment algorithm still occurs and may benefit from a mastoidectomy with antibiotic irrigation using a catheter in certain cases. We theorize that resolution of otorrhea results from this technique by decreasing the burden of diseased mucosa and providing a larger concentration or dose of antibiotic to the middle ear cleft through the antrum. High-resolution images of the technique and catheter placement are included in this review. Despite being an uncommon management strategy, the literature suggests an indication for performing a mastoidectomy in a small percentage of patients with a chronically draining tympanostomy tube.

Management algorithm of acute cholecystitis after percutaneous cholecystostomy catheter placement based on outcomes from 377 patients.

To report outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) catheter placement in patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) and propose management algorithm of AC after PC catheter placement based on the outcomes. Retrospective study was performed. 419 patients who underwent PC between July 2010 and September 2016 were included. Patients who underwent PC for indication other than AC were excluded. The primary outcome was definitive treatment of AC following PC, including cholecystectomy or percutaneous cholecystolithotomy. Secondary outcomes include removal of drainage catheter without further management or death with catheter in place. Based on outcomes, we proposed management algorithm of AC after PC catheter placement. 377 of 419 patients underwent PC for treatment of AC (median age, 66years; range 18-100years). Technical success rate was 100% with 2.4% major complications rate and 1.6%minor complications rate. Following PC, 118 patients (31%) underwent definitive treatment with cholecystectomy. Sixty-one patients (16%) underwent definitive treatment with percutaneous cholecystolithotomy with removal of catheters. Seventy-four patients (20%) had their catheters removed upon resolution of cholecystitis without undergoing surgery or stone removal. Fifty patients (13%) died with catheters in place due to other comorbidities. Five patients (1%) still had their catheters in place at the end of the study. PC remains a viable option for treatment of AC with low complication rate and can be used as bridge to definitive therapy. Our proposed management algorithm can be a guideline for the management of AC after PC catheter placement.

Asclepius and Yellow Ribbon techniques: Efficacious alternative strategies for advancing a coronary sinus electrophysiology catheter.

BackgroundInserting an electrophysiological (EP) catheter into the coronary sinus (CS) via the femoral vein can be difficult and time‐consuming in patients with variants of the CS orifice or lumen curve. Our experience with such patients inspired us to develop two new techniques: the Asclepius and Yellow Ribbon techniques.MethodsData from a 4‐year period were retrieved from records of patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) or Wolff–Parkinson–White (WPW) syndrome. Data were analyzed to determine the success and complication rates of conventional and alternative techniques for catheter placement.ResultsThe success rate of the Asclepius technique was 96.7% (30/31) and that of the Yellow Ribbon technique was 100.0% (7/7). The overall success rate of these two techniques was 97.3% (37/38).ConclusionsWith a high success rate, shorter procedure time, and no complications, the Asclepius and Yellow ribbon techniques may be safe, inexpensive, and effective alternative strategies for EP catheter placement in patients with difficult coronary sinus orifice access.