Catheter-directed Thrombolysis Treatment Research Articles

Predictors of bleeding complications during catHeter-dirEcted thrombolysis for peripheral arterial occlusions (POCHET).

The risk of major bleeding complications in catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) for acute limb ischemia (ALI) remains high, with reported major bleeding complication rates in up to 1 in every 10 treated patients. Fibrinogen was the only predictive marker used for bleeding complications in CDT, despite the lack of high quality evidence to support this. Therefore, recent international guidelines recommend against the use of fibrinogen during CDT. However, no alternative biomarkers exist to effectively predict CDT-related bleeding complications. The aim of the POCHET biobank is to prospectively assess the rate and etiology of bleeding complications during CDT and to provide a biobank of blood samples to investigate potential novel biomarkers to predict bleeding complications during CDT. The POCHET biobank is a multicentre prospective biobank. After informed consent, all consecutive patients with lower extremity ALI eligible for CDT are included. All patients are treated according to a predefined standard operating procedure which is aligned in all participating centres. Baseline and follow-up data are collected. Prior to CDT and subsequently every six hours, venous blood samples are obtained and stored in the biobank for future analyses. The primary outcome is the occurrence of non-access related major bleeding complications, which is assessed by an independent adjudication committee. Secondary outcomes are non-major bleeding complications and other CDT related complications. Proposed biomarkers to be investigated include fibrinogen, to end the debate on its usefulness, anti-plasmin and D-Dimer. The POCHET biobank provides contemporary data and outcomes of patients during CDT for ALI, coupled with their blood samples taken prior and during CDT. Thereby, the POCHET biobank is a real world monitor on biomarkers during CDT, supporting a broad spectrum of future research for the identification of patients at high risk for bleeding complications during CDT and to identify new biomarkers to enhance safety in CDT treatment.

Outcomes of covered vs bare metal stents for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease

ObjectiveWe retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes of self-expanding covered stents (CSs) and bare metal stents (BMSs) in the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) at a single center between 2016 and 2022. MethodsAll patients with AIOD receiving endovascular therapy at a single center from January 2016 to October 2022 were continuously analyzed, including patients with lesions of all classes according to the Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC-II). Relevant clinical and baseline data were collected, and propensity score matching was performed to compare CSs and BMSs in terms of baseline characteristics, surgical factors, 30-day outcomes, 5-year primary patency, and limb salvage. The follow-up results were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify predictors of primary patency. ResultsA total of 209 patients with AIOD were enrolled in the study, including 135 patients (64.6%) in the CS group and 74 patients (35.4%) in the BMS group. Surgical success rates (100% vs 100%; P = 1.00), early (<30-day) mortality rates (0% vs 0%; P = 1.00), cumulative surgical complication rate (12.0% vs 8.0%; P = .891), 5-year primary patency rate (83.4% vs 86.9%; P = .330), secondary patency rate (96% vs 100%; P = .570), and limb salvage rate (100% vs 100%; P = 1.00) did not exhibit significant differences between the two groups. Patients in the CS group had a lower preoperative ankle-brachial index (0.48 ± 0.26 vs 0.52 ± 0.19; P = .032), more cases of complex AIOD (especially TASC D) (47.4% vs 9.5%; P < .001), more chronic total occlusive lesions (77.0% vs 31.1%; P < .001), and more severe calcification (20.7% vs 14.9%; P < .036). After propensity score matching, 50 patients (25 with CS and 25 with BMS) were selected. The results showed that only severe calcification (32.0% vs 8.0%; P = .034) and ankle-brachial index increase (0.45 ± 0.15 vs 0.41 ± 0.22; P = .038) were significantly different between the groups. In terms of surgical factors, patients in the CS group had more use of bilateral femoral or combined brachial artery percutaneous access (60.0% vs 12.0%; P < .001), more number of stents used (2.3 ± 1.2 vs 1.3 ± 0.7; P < .001), longer mean stent length (9.3 ± 3.3 vs 5.8 ± 2.6 cm; P < .001), and more catheter-directed thrombolysis treatment (32.0% vs 4.0%; P = .009). Multivariate Cox survival analysis showed that severe calcification (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.85; P = .048) was the only independent predictor of the primary patency rate. ConclusionsAll patients with AIOD who underwent endovascular therapy were included and achieved good outcomes with both CSs and BMSs. The influence of confounding factors in the two groups was minimized by propensity score matching, and the 5-year patency rates were generally similar in the unmatched and matched cohorts. Postoperative hemodynamic improvement was more obvious in patients in the CS group. For more complex lesions, CS is recommended to be preferred. Especially for severe calcification lesions, which is the only independent predictor of primary patency, CS showed obvious advantages. Further studies with more samples are needed to investigate the role of stent types in AIOD treatment.

Effect of the timing of iliac vein stent implantation on catheter-directed thrombolysis in acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis patients with severe iliac vein stenosis: a retrospective study.

To investigate the effect of the timing of iliac vein stent implantation on catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) patients with severe iliac vein stenosis. The clinical data of 66 patients with acute lower extremity DVT complicated with severe iliac vein stenosis from May 2017 to May 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups by timing of iliac vein stent implantation: group A (iliac vein stent implantation before CDT treatment) for 34 and group B (iliac vein stent implantation after CDT treatment) for 32. The detumescence rate of affected limb, the thrombus clearance rate, the thrombolytic efficiency, the complication rate, the hospitalization cost, the stent patency rate within 1year, and the scores (venous clinical severity score, Villalta, and chronic venous insufficiency questionnaire (CIVIQ) score) at 1year postoperatively were compared between the two groups. The thrombolytic efficiency of group A was higher than that of group B, while the incidence of complications and hospitalization expenses in group A were lower than those in group B. There was no statistical significance in the detumescence rate of affected limb, the thrombus clearance rate, the stent patency rate within 1year, and the scores (VCSS, Villalta, and CIVIQ score) at 1year postoperatively between the two groups. For acute lower extremity DVT patients with severe iliac vein stenosis, iliac vein stent implantation before CDT treatment can improve the thrombolytic efficiency, and reduce the incidence of complications and hospitalization costs.

Sex-related differences in the effect of rotational thrombectomy for thrombus-containing lower limbs ischemic lesions

BackgroundTo assess the immediate effect and factors affecting the efficacy of rotational thrombectomy (RT) in patients with thrombus-containing lower-limb ischaemic lesions.MethodsPatients were retrospectively divided into two groups: RT and RT+ CDT (Catheter-directed thrombolysis). The RT group included patients in whom intraoperative thrombus aspiration was successful, while the RT + CDT group included patients in whom intraoperative thrombus aspiration was less effective and remedial CDT treatment was used. The primary outcome was the immediate effect of RT on thrombus-containing lower-limb ischaemic lesions.ResultsFrom May 2015 to July 2021, 170 patients (113 men, 57 women; mean age, 74.0 years) with thrombus-containing lower-limb ischaemic lesions were treated in our centre. Of these patients, 113 received RT only, while 57 received RT + CDT. There were no significant intergroup differences in terms of age, disease duration, or comorbidities, but a higher proportion of male patients and higher preoperative plasma D-dimer levels (1.23 vs. 0.84; p = .017) was observed in the RT + CDT group. There were no significant intergroup differences in terms of diagnosis, lesion characteristics, lesion location, or lesion length. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that male sex (odds ratio [OR], 2.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.098–6.410; p = .030) and poor distal runoff (OR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.439–5.988; p = .003) were associated with higher rates of additional CDT. Male patients also had a significantly longer onset time, more thrombotic occlusions, and a greater frequency of in-stent restenosis.ConclusionsRT alone or with CDT is a feasible primary treatment option for thrombus debulking. Sex significantly influences the effect of RT on thrombus-containing lower-limb ischaemic lesions.

Abstract No. 280 Single-center experience of large-bore thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis in treatment of acute pulmonary embolism

To compare changes in RV/LV ratio, assess clinical response, and changes in pulmonary artery (PA) pressures in pulmonary embolism (PE) patients who were treated with either large-bore thrombectomy or catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDL)

Safety and Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment on Pregnancy-Related Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Objective: This study investigates the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatments on pregnancy-related iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of 46 patients who had symptomatic pregnancy-related iliofemoral DVT and underwent endovascular treatment. The patients treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) were classified as the CDT group. In contrast, those treated with CDT combined with pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) or angioplasty/stenting were classified as the pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT) group. Results: Based on the immediate post-operative clot burden reduction rate analysis of 46 patients: 22 cases were completely dissolved (lysis grades III), 12 were partially dissolved (lysis grades II), and 12 failed (lysis grades I). There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of clot burden reduction between the CDT group (n = 19) and the PCDT group (n = 27) (p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of bleeding events between the two groups (p = 0.989). At 24 months, cumulative venous patency in the CDT group was 50.0%, compared to 78.2% in the PCDT group. Furthermore, there was a statistically significant difference in Villalta score (p = 0.001) and venous severity scoring (VCSS score) (p = 0.005) between the two groups. Conclusions: CDT treatment combined with PMT or angioplasty/stenting is comparatively safe and effective for pregnant-related DVT patients. PCDT outperforms CDT in terms of immediate efficacy and reduces the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome with better midterm outcomes.

Efficacy of ultrasound-accelerated versus traditional catheter-directed thrombolysis in treatment of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background:There is no meta-analysis or review in the literature to compare and evaluate the difference and effectiveness of ultrasonic-accelerated thrombolysis (UAT) and catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) in lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) patients. Therefore, we conducted this protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy between UAT and CDT for patients with lower extremity DVT.Methods:We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols reporting guidelines to conduct this study. Reviewers will search the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE online databases using the key phrases “deep venous thrombosis,” “thrombolysis,” and “ultrasound-accelerated” for all cohort studies published up to July 22, 2021. There is no restriction in the dates of publication or language in the search for the current review. The primary outcome is major bleeding. Secondary outcomes include health-related quality of life and complications such as recurrent venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, in-stent thrombosis, and death. Review Manager software (v 5.4; Cochrane Collaboration) will be used for the meta-analysis. A P value of < .05 is considered to be statistically significant.Results:We hypothesized that these two methods would provide similar therapeutic benefits.OSF registration number:10.17605/OSF.IO/YZB3H.

Comparison of ultrasound-accelerated versus conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Recent in vitro and clinical studies have shown that ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis (USACDT) can accelerate thrombolysis. Therefore, in this meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of USACDT with conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with deep vein thrombosis. A systematic search of the following electronic databases was performed from their dates of inception to 20 June 2020: MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. All randomized controlled trials that directly compared the complications and efficacy of USACDT and conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with deep vein thrombosis were identified. The statistical analysis was performed using comprehensive meta-analysis software. Finally, 18 studies with a total of 597 participants were included in our meta-analysis according to the eligibility criteria. Pooled proportion of USACDT success in patients with deep vein thrombosis was 87.8% (18 studies; 95% CI: 83.1-91.3). Success rate was significantly higher in USACDT treatment than in conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis treatment (seven studies; OR: 2.96; 95% CI: 1.69-5.16; P < 0.01)). Although the mean infusion time was higher in catheter-directed thrombolysis treatment compared to USACDT treatment, this difference was not statistically significant (three studies; MD: -1.46; 95% CI: -3.25-0.32; P = 0.10). Moreover, pooled rate of complications was lower in USACDT than catheter-directed thrombolysis which was not statistically significant (seven studies; OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.13-1.76; P = 0.27). This meta-analysis revealed that USACDT significantly increased the success rate of thrombolysis compared to conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis. Furthermore, USACDT was associated with lower rate of complication and infusion time. Taken together, these findings confirm the superiority of this novel intervention over conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis in treatment of patients with deep vein thrombosis.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of AngioJet and CDT for Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis Among Chinese Population.

AngioJet has sufficient safety and efficacy in the treatment of acute and subacute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (LEDVT). But the price of consumables used by AngioJet is relatively high and there is a lack of relevant research on health economics to measure the benefits to patients. Objective of this study is to estimate the cost effectiveness of AngioJet compared with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) among Chinese population. Using a Markov decision model, we compared the 2 treatment strategies in patients with LEDVT. The model captured the development of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), recurrent venous thromboembolism, and treatment-related adverse events within a lifetime horizon and the perspective of a third-party payer. Model uncertainty was assessed with one-way and Monte Carl sensitivity analyses. The clinical inputs were obtained from the literature. Costs obtained from the hospital accounts and the literature are expressed in US dollars ($). Utilities were defined as quality adjusted life years (QALY). In cost-effectiveness analysis, AngioJet accumulated $1064.6445/QALY compared with $2080.1561/QALY after CDT treatment alone. AngioJet has higher long-term cost-effectiveness than CDT at a willingness to pay threshold of $11 233.52. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the utilities of PTS and post-LEDVT state had significant influence on the results and the model maintained a strong stability under ± 10% fluctuation of utilities. Monte Carl sensitivity analysis shows that AngioJet model has strong stability and AngioJet has higher long-term cost-effectiveness than CDT. AngioJet is likely to be a cost-effective alternative to the CDT for patients with LEDVT.

Short Duration Catheter-directed Thrombolysis for Acute Pulmonary Embolism Rapidly Improves Acute Cardiac Function

Treatment of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism (PE) has been shown to be a valuable therapeutic modality. However, a paucity of data exists, regarding length and guidelines for treatment and typically these patients are treated by other than vascular surgery specialists. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of short duration treatment of massive and submassive PE, exclusively by vascular surgeons, without routine follow-up pulmonary angiography. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data at a single-institution treating massive and submassive PE with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). Internal review board approval was obtained. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed from the data set. Continuous covariates were presented in mean (SD) or median (IQR) and categorical covariates as number (percentage). For continuous variables, a paired t test was used to measure results against the baseline. P value less than 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. STATA® statistical software was used for analysis. From January of 2013 to December of 2016, 28 consecutive patients were treated for massive and submassive PE with CDT. All patients had evidence of right heart strain on echocardiogram, as evidence by a right ventricular to left ventricular (RV/LV) diameter ratio of >0.9. Of the 28 patients, 19 (68%) had hemodynamic derangement with either systolic blood pressure (SBP) less then 90 or tachycardia (HR>100). The mean RV/LV ratio before CDT was 1.18. After therapy, RV/LV ratio was reduced to 0.86 at 48hr (P<0.0001). In addition, mean right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) before CDT treatment was 53mm Hg, and after treatment, RVSP was reduced to 40mm Hg at 48-hr (P value=0.0001). There was complete resolution of hypotension in hemodynamically unstable patients (i.e., SBP <90) after CDT. Mean HR before therapy was 102. After 24hr of CDT, mean HR reduced to 84 (P<0.0001). From 2013 to 2016, there was a significant decrease in mean hospital length of stay from 8days to 4days (P=0.05). Mean t-PA dose used decreased, as well, from 2014 (21.7mg) to 2016 (14.9mg), but this was not statistically significant (P=0.13). There was no major bleeding complications or CDT-related death in any of the patients treated during the study period. CDT treatment of massive and submassive PE is safe and highly efficacious at reducing right heart strain acutely. Significant hemodynamic improvement was shown in our cohort throughout the study period. Improvement in tachycardia and resolution of hypotension were seen within 24hr of CDT. Tissue plasminogen activator dosage decreased throughout the study period as a more restrictive approach to follow-up angiography was used without adverse safety or patient outcomes.

The perplexity of catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep venous thrombosis: the approaches play an important role.

The recent adjunctive catheter-directed thrombolysis (ATTRACT) trial rose a controversy about the treatment effect of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in deep venous thrombosis (DVT). In fact, most studies including the ATTRACT trial did not perform subgroup analysis of catheterization approaches. Different approaches would confound the conclusions. Therefore, a single-center retrospective analysis was performed to compare the differences between the antegrade (AGA) and retrograde (RGA) approaches. Total 217 DVT patients treated with CDT were enrolled from January 2010 to December 2017, with mean age of 55.3years (67 received antegrade approach, 150 received retrograde approach). The clot burden reduction by segment was evaluated. The mean access establishment time and thrombolytic time were compared. The patency of the iliofemoral vein at 6months was evaluated. The rate of PTS, quality of life and venous insufficiency were assessed at 1year. AGA group showed better thrombolytic effect in popliteal and femoral vein than RGA group. The rate of iliofemoral clot burden reduction in RGA group was mostly at Grade II, while most were at Grade III in AGA group. The retrograde approach showed better thrombolysis effect in iliofemoral DVT than popliteal to iliac DVT. The RGA group reported longer mean access establishment time (5.4 ± 1.8 vs 27.0 ± 7.5min, p < 0.001) and thrombolytic time (6.9 ± 1.5 days vs 6.8 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.586). At 6months, RGA group had a lower rate of femoral vein patency (52.0% vs 89.6%, p < 0.001) and a higher rate of venous insufficiency (52.0% vs 29.9%, p < 0.001), compared with AGA group. Although there was no difference in the rate of PTS, the RGA group showed higher Villalta scores in the free and mild PTS. The antegrade approach was preferably recommended over the retrograde approach for CDT treatment.

Less frequent post-thrombotic syndrome after successful catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.

Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) occurs in 20-50% of patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT). In this study, we aimed to identify potential markers of thrombolysis success at the early stage and to clarify the relationship between early thrombolysis success and subsequent PTS development in patients with acute DVT in the iliac vein. Fifty-two consecutive patients with acute iliofemoral DVT who were treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) within 21days of onset were enrolled. An infusion catheter with multiple side holes was placed to cover the thrombosed vessel entirely. Urokinase solution was administered either continuously or with the pulse-spray method at a dose of 480,000-720,000IU/day over the course of 2-7days. During CDT, unfractionated heparin (UFH) was infused simultaneously via the access sheath to prevent thrombus formation. Early success was defined as lysis grade ≥ 50% and restoration of forward flow. PTS was diagnosed based on the Villalta scale. Based on the lysis grading method, complete lysis (grade III) was achieved in 8 of 52 (16%) limbs. Lysis grade II (50-99%) was achieved in 35 of 52 (67%) limbs. Lysis grade I (< 50%) was achieved in 9 of 52 (17%) limbs. Therefore, grade II and grade III lytic outcomes (early success) were observed in 43 patients (83%). One-year clinical follow-up was performed for 43 patients (83%). PTS occurred in seven (16%) patients. Early success was more frequently observed in patients without PTS than in those with PTS (92% vs. 43%; P < 0.01). Early success was only significantly associated with PTS in the multivariate analysis. Patients with acute symptomatic iliofemoral DVT who had early success from CDT treatment during the acute phase less frequently progressed to PTS. Patients with early success tended to undergo the pulse-spray method and had a shorter interval from symptom onset to CDT. The use of pulse-spray method and early initiation of CDT since DVT onset were potential markers of thrombolysis success.

Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of the Endovascular Treatment for Acute Limb Ischemia with Percutaneous Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy Compared with Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis

To evaluate the rates of limb salvage, survival, and perioperative mortality in patients with acute limb ischemia (ALI) submitted to endovascular revascularization with pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). This was a retrospective consecutive cohort study of patients with ALI who were submitted to endovascular treatment with PMT or fibrinolysis at the Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual (São Paulo, Brazil), between July 2015 and December 2018. The limb salvage rate and survival rate at 720days were analyzed in both the PMT (group 1) and CDT treatment (group 2), as well as the perioperative mortality rate (PMR) at 30days after surgery. One hundred twelve patients were admitted to the emergency department with ALI between July 2015 and December 2018. Seventeen patients diagnosed with Rutherford III irreversible ALI and 46 patients submitted to open surgery were excluded. Thus, 49 patients were submitted to endovascular surgery; 18 (36.7%) were classified into group 1, and 31 (63.3%) were classified into group 2. The clinical data were equal between the 2 groups, but there was a higher prevalence of thrombophilia in group 1 (3 cases; P<0.001). The limb salvage rate and the overall survival rate at 720days were similar between groups 1 and 2 (87.8% vs. 89.7%, P=0.78 and 84.7% vs. 69.2%, P=0.82, respectively). There was no statistical difference regarding secondary patency rates at 720days between groups 1 and 2 (group 1, 81.9% and group 2, 78.8%; P=0.66). The PMR was 16.7% (8 patients) within the first 30days. Group 2 had a higher overall mortality rate (OMR) (6 patients, 19.3%, P=0.03). Regarding the PMT group, there was a higher rate of complications such as myoglobinuria, hematuria, acute renal failure, and death in the subgroup of patients in whom there were performed more than 150 cycles/sec during the surgery (P < 0.001). In the present study, the PMT and CDT endovascular procedures had similar limb salvage, overall survival, and secondary patency rates. However, the OMR was higher in the CDT group. Another important finding was related to the number of cycles/sec performed in the PMT group, in whom patients with more than 150 cycles/sec have presented with higher rates of hematuria, myoglobinuria, acute renal failure, and death.

Guidance of Venous Stent Implantation after Catheter-directed Thrombosis in Patients with Acute Left Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis based on Pressure Gradient Differences between the Iliac Vein and Inferior Vena Cava: A Single-center Retrospective Study

Iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS) can lead to acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Endovascular venous stenting has become a preferred treatment for IVCS. In this article, we guide stent implantation by the pressure gradient of iliac vein and inferior vena cava. To evaluate the feasibility of guidance of venous stent implantation based on venous pressure gradient difference. A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with acute left lower extremity DVT who were treated in our center from March 2012 to December 2017. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1: from January 2015 to December 2017, patients were treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and stent implantation was guided by the pressure gradient of iliac vein and inferior vena cava after thrombectomy; group 2: from May 2012 to December 2014, patients underwent CDT treatment without stent implantation. In group 1, the patients were divided into 2 groups according to the difference in pressure gradient after CDT: the stent group (>2mm Hg) and the control group (≤2mm Hg). All patients were evaluated by color Doppler ultrasound at 1, 3, and 6months after the operation to evaluate the patency of the iliofemoral vein. The Villalta score was used to evaluate the incidence of PTS. The primary and secondary patency rate of group 1 at 1, 3, and 6months after operation were higher than that in group 2 (P<0.05). In group 1, there was no significant difference in the primary and secondary patency rate between the stent group and the control group at 1, 3, and 6months after the operation. The incidence of PTS in group 1 at 6months after the operation was lower than that in group 2 (P<0.05). In group 1, there was no significant difference in the incidence of PTS between the stent group and the control group at 6months after the operation. Practice proves that it is simple and effective to guide stent implantation according to differences in pressure gradients. Two millimeter of mercury is the traditional standard for venous pressure interference in the pelvic area, and the effectiveness of this method was proved.

Endovascular Treatment for Iliofemoral Vein Thrombosis with Composite Stents

To evaluate the applicability of endovascular treatment for iliofemoral vein thrombosis with composite stents. Between September 2013 and August 2016, 29 consecutive patients underwent endovascular therapy with composite stents for iliofemoral vein thrombosis and were followed up at our institution. All the patients with acute or chronic iliofemoral vein thrombosis enrolled in this study were evaluated by color Doppler ultrasonography and diagnosed by venography. Treatment measures and related complications were recorded, and cumulative stent patency was assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves. Patients with acute iliofemoral vein thrombosis (n=7) were successfully treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis treatment, balloon angioplasty, and stents, whereas patients (n==22) with chronic deep vein thrombosis were treated successfully by balloon angioplasty and stent only. Among all patients, 2 stents were inserted in 25 patients, whereas 3 stents were deployed in 4 patients. Endovascular treatment for iliofemoral vein thrombosis with laser-cut stents combined with Wallstents showed primary patency of treated limbs at 6, 12, and 24months was 96.6%, 93.1% and 93.1%, respectively. Mean duration of follow-up was 23months, and there was no occurrence of contralateral vein thrombosis during follow-up by ultrasound. Iliofemoral vein thrombosis was successfully recanalized by endovascular therapy with composite stents, and there was no occurrence of contralateral vein thrombosis by ultrasound during follow-up.

Therapeutic effect of AngioJet mechanical thrombus aspiration system combined with catheter directed thrombolysis on acute deep vein thrombosis

Objective: To analyze the curative effect of AngioJet mechanical thrombus aspiration combined with catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) on acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (LEDVT). Methods: The clinical data of 20 cases of acute LEDVT treated by AngioJet combined with CDT were analyzed. The inferior vena cava filter was implanted preoperatively, and then the thrombolysis was performed by using AngioJet. The thrombolytic catheter was placed for CDT treatment, and the thrombolysis was evaluated by review angiography. Results: All cases were successfully punctured and catheterized. The suction time was (235±75) seconds. The usage of urokinase was (180±90)*10(4) U. The differences before and after thrombolysis of ipsilateral and contralateral thigh circumference were (8.3±1.5) cm and (2.5±1.0) cm, respectively. The differences before and after thrombolysis of the ipsilateral and contralateral calf circumference were (2.4±1.0)cm and (1.5±0.7) cm, respectively. All of which had statistical significant (P<0.01). Conclusion: AngioJet mechanical thrombus aspiration system is a novel and safe method for the treatment of acute LEDVT. When used in conjunction with CDT, its advantages was more significant.

IF10. Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis of Acute Entire Limb Deep Vein Thrombosis With Below-the-Knee Access: A Retrospective Analysis From a Single Center

Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was a rapid and efficient method to eradicate thrombus and has been confirmed to reduce the development of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). The popliteal or femoral vein approach is the most common venous access for CDT; however, when the thrombosis involved with crural or popliteal vein, these approaches may not be appropriate. This study was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of below-the-knee (BTK) access in the treatment of entire limb deep vein thrombosis. Retrospective analysis of a collected database of consecutive CDT treatment of acute lower limb deep vein thrombosis with the BTK access (2009-2015). A consecutive series of 78 patients (51 men), mean age, 53 years (range, 27-70) with first-time DVT were retrospectively analyzed. All of the patients were symptomatic. Early efficacy was assessed with a thrombus score based on venography. Latest and 2-year follow-up included popliteal and iliofemoral patency assessed with duplex ultrasound or venography, and PTS was assessed with the Villalta scale. Lysis was successful (ie, >50%) in 78 cases of entire-limb DVT. CDT was performed by accessing the ipsilateral small saphenous vein, posterior tibial vein, and popliteal join point (27 via incision, 61 via puncture guided by ultrasound or fluoroscopy). Of 16 total bleeding complications, none were classified as major, and 11 were related to the site of incision in the small saphenous or posterior tibial vein, causing lower leg numbness. Poor wound healing occurred in one case. At the latest follow-up, the patency was 87.09% (54 of 62). During the 24-month follow-up, the patency 80.43% (37 of 46) and the PTS rate was 32.61% (15 of 46). Further, the time between symptom onset and lysis was inversely correlated with the Villalta score (P < .05). Timely CDT after DVT symptom onset reduces the incidence of PTS. BTK access is an appropriate selection to entire-limb DVT, with safety and efficacy.

Эффективность катетер-направленного тромболизиса в лечении флеботромбозов

Эффективность катетер-направленного тромболизиса в лечении флеботромбозов

Health-related quality of life after catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis: secondary outcomes of the randomised, non-blinded, parallel-group CaVenT study

ObjectivesTo investigate whether additional catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) improves long-term quality of life (QOL) compared with standard treatment with anticoagulation and compression stockings alone in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis...

Iliac vein stenting as a durable option for residual stenosis after catheter-directed thrombolysis and angioplasty of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis secondary to May–Thurner syndrome

This study aims to evaluate the primary patency and clinical outcomes after stenting for residual iliac venous stenosis during catheter-directed thrombolysis treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis arising from May-Thurner syndome. A retrospective study was done for the all patients who underwent iliac vein stenting after catheter-directed thrombolysis treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis due to May-Thurner syndrome from January 2005 to April 2011 in Inha University Hospital. Patient information was assembled from the electronic medical records, imaging and interview. The patency of iliac vein stent was evaluated with serial computed tomography. Fifty-one patients were enrolled. The median age was 70 years (range 44-86). There were 37 females (72.5%). The duration of symptoms of acute deep vein thrombosis before catheter-directed thrombolysis treatment was 6 days (median, range 1-33). Self-expanding stent was used for iliac vein stenting. Initial technical success rate was 94.1%. There were two complications (3.9%): an arteriovenous fistula formation in left popliteal area and a right inguinal hematoma. Mean follow-up was 15.6 months (range 6 days-80.8 months). Primary patency rate after iliac vein stenting was 95.8% at 6 months, 87.5% at 12 months and 84.3% at 24 months. Four patients had recurrent thrombotic occlusion (7.8%) during the follow-up. Iliac vein stenting showed good primary patency rate with few complications. Iliac vein stenting is a durable option for residual stenosis after catheter-directed thrombolysis treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis in May-Thurner syndrome.