Catheter-based Renal Denervation Research Articles

10 years after treatment with renal denervation of the sympathetic nerves for resistant hypertension: what happened to the patients and their office blood pressure? An observational study

Abstract Background Catheter-based renal denervation of the sympathetic nerves (RDN) for resistant hypertension has long been controversial. A renewed clinical and scientific interest in defining the appropriate role of RDN in the treatment of resistant hypertension has become evident in recent years. The efficacy and safety of RDN treatment is mainly based on available data up to three years, whereas data concerning the long-term effect and safety are scarce. Purpose We therefore wanted to investigate the long time change in blood pressure (BP) in patients treated with RDN for resistant hypertension. Methods A review of data from the electronic patient journal concerning all RDN treated patients was initiated and completed in October 2023. Every registration of an office BP listed in the patient file, antihypertensive treatment, cardiovascular events, and renal function between 2012 and 2023 were registered. For each patient the average of all office post RDN blood were averaged for every year and for their complete follow-up. The outcome in blood pressure was the change in BP from baseline pre RDN office to follow-up Results Between January 2012 and October 2013, 19 consecutive patients underwent RDN treatment, 10 men and 9 women with a median age of 63 years (range 35-74 years). At baseline the median systolic office BP was 181 mmHg (range 162–230 mmHg) and the diastolic office BP 97 mmHg (range 82-123 mmHg) on a median of 5 (range 0-7 ) antihypertensive drugs. During follow-up the number of antihypertensive drugs were reduced in 7, unchanged in 10, and increased in 2 patients. Two patients left the outpatient clinic with normal BP after 2 years. Two patients developed heart failure after 7 years and were censored at that time-point. 15 (79%) patients had office BP recorded up to 9 or 10 years. In the 15 (79%) patients with available office BP 9 to 10 years after RDN the median systolic and diastolic office BPs were reduced by 39 mmHg (range -2 to - 66 mmHg) and 18 mmHg (range -11 to - 55 mmHg) respectively, relative reduction 22% (range 5-36%) and 20% (range 6-32), respectively. Conclusion During a follow-up of 9 to 10 years after RDN without a step-up in antihypertensive medication a relative decrease of ~20% in systolic and diastolic BP was observed.

Renal nerves in physiology, pathophysiology and interoception.

Sympathetic efferent renal nerves have key roles in the regulation of kidney function and blood pressure. Increased renal sympathetic nerve activity is thought to contribute to hypertension by promoting renal sodium retention, renin release and renal vasoconstriction. This hypothesis led to the development of catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) for the treatment of hypertension. Two RDN devices that ablate both efferent and afferent renal nerves received FDA approval for this indication in 2023. However, in animal models, selective ablation of afferent renal nerves resulted in comparable anti-hypertensive effects to ablation of efferent and afferent renal nerves and was associated with a reduction in sympathetic nerve activity. Selective afferent RDN also improved kidney function in a chronic kidney disease model. Notably, the beneficial effects of RDN extend beyond hypertension and chronic kidney disease to other clinical conditions that are associated with elevated sympathetic nerve activity, including heart failure and arrhythmia. These findings suggest that the kidney is an interoceptive organ, as increased renal sensory nerve activity modulates sympathetic activity to other organs. Future studies are needed to translate this knowledge into novel therapies for the treatment of hypertension and other cardiorenal diseases.

Effects of Catheter-Based Renal Denervation in Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Several sham-controlled trials have investigated the efficacy and safety of catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) with mixed outcomes. We aimed to perform a comprehensive meta-analysis of all randomized, sham-controlled trials investigating RDN with first- and second-generation devices in hypertension. We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library for eligible trials. Outcomes included both efficacy (24-hour and office systolic [SBP] and diastolic blood pressure [DBP]) and safety (all-cause death, vascular complication, renal artery stenosis >70%, hypertensive crisis) of RDN. We performed a study-level, pairwise, random-effects meta-analysis of the summary data. Ten trials comprising 2478 patients with hypertension while being either off or on treatment were included. Compared with sham, RDN reduced 24-hour and office systolic blood pressure by 4.4 mm Hg (95% CI, 2.7 to 6.1; P<0.00001) and 6.6 mm Hg (95% CI, 3.6 to 9.7; P<0.0001), respectively. The 24-hour and office diastolic blood pressure paralleled these findings (-2.6 mm Hg [95% CI, -3.6 to -1.5]; P<0.00001; -3.5 mm Hg [95% CI, -5.4 to -1.6]; P=0.0003). There was no difference in 24-hour and office systolic blood pressure reduction between trials with and without concomitant antihypertensive medication (P for interaction, 0.62 and 0.73, respectively). There was no relevant difference in vascular complications (odds ratio, 1.69 [95% CI, 0.57 to 5.0]; P=0.34), renal artery stenosis (odds ratio, 1.50 [95% CI, 0.06 to 36.97]; P=0.80), hypertensive crisis (odds ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.30 to 1.38]; P=0.26), and all-cause death (odds ratio, 1.76 [95% CI, 0.34 to 9.20]; P=0.50) between RDN and sham groups. Change of renal function based on estimated glomerular filtration rate was comparable between groups (P for interaction, 0.84). There was significant heterogeneity between trials. RDN safely reduces ambulatory and office systolic blood pressure/diastolic blood pressure versus a sham procedure in the presence and absence of antihypertensive medication.

Efficacy and Safety of Catheter-Based Radiofrequency Renal Denervation in Chinese Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension: The Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Multi-Center Iberis-HTN Trial.

Renal denervation (RDN) can lower blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension in both the presence and absence of medication. This is the first sham-controlled trial investigating the safety and efficacy of RDN in China. This prospective, multicenter, randomized, patient- and outcome-assessor-blinded, sham-controlled trial investigated radiofrequency RDN in patients with hypertension on standardized triple antihypertensive therapy. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to undergo RDN using a multi-electrode radiofrequency catheter (Iberis; AngioCare, Shanghai, China) or a sham procedure. The primary efficacy outcome was the between-group difference in baseline-adjusted change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP from randomization to 6 months. Of 217 randomized patients (mean age, 45.3±10.2 years; 21% female), 107 were randomized to RDN and 110 were randomized to sham control. At 6 months, there was a greater reduction in 24-hour systolic BP in the RDN (-13.0±12.1 mm Hg) compared with the sham control group (-3.0±13.0 mm Hg; baseline-adjusted between-group difference, -9.4 mm Hg [95% CI, -12.8 to -5.9]; P<0.001). Compared with sham, 24-hour diastolic BP was lowered by -5.0 mm Hg ([95% CI, -7.5 to -2.4]; P<0.001) 6 months after RDN, and office systolic and diastolic BP was lowered by -6.4 mm Hg ([95% CI, -10.5 to -2.3]; P=0.003) and -5.1 mm Hg ([95% CI, -8.2 to -2.0]; P=0.001), respectively. One patient in the RDN group experienced an access site complication (hematoma), which resolved without sequelae. No other major device- or procedure-related safety events occurred through follow-up. In this trial of Chinese patients with uncontrolled hypertension on a standardized triple pharmacotherapy, RDN was safe and reduced ambulatory and office BP at 6 months compared with sham. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02901704.

Changes in blood pressure after catheter-based renal denervation in South Africa.

Renal denervation (RDN) is an interventional treatment for patients with uncontrolled hypertension. The Global SYMPLICITY Registry (GSR) is a prospective, all-comer, world-wide registry designed to assess the safety and efficacy of RDN. We evaluated the outcomes in South African patients in the GSR over 12 months. Eligible patients with hypertension had a daytime mean blood pressure (BP) > 135/85 mmHg or night-time mean BP > 120/70 mmHg. Office and 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP reduction and adverse events over 12 months were evaluated. South African patients (n = 36) in the GSR had a mean age of 54.4 ± 9.9 years with a median of four prescribed antihypertensive medication classes. At 12 months, mean changes in office and 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP were -16.9 ± 24.2 and -15.3 ± 18.5 mmHg, respectively, with only one adverse event recorded. RDN safety and efficacy in South African patients were consistent with world-wide GSR results.

Randomized Trials of Renal Denervation for Uncontrolled Hypertension: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

Despite optimal medical therapy, a significant proportion of patients' blood pressure remains uncontrolled. Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) has been proposed as a potential intervention for uncontrolled hypertension. We conducted an updated meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of RDN in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, with emphasis on the differential effect of RDN in patients on and off antihypertensive medications. Online databases were searched to identify randomized clinical trials comparing efficacy and safety of RDN versus control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Subgroup analyses were conducted for sham-controlled trials and studies that used RDN devices that have gained or are currently seeking US Food and Drug Administration approval. Fifteen trials with 2581 patients (RDN, 1723; sham, 858) were included. In patients off antihypertensive medications undergoing RDN, a significant reduction in 24-hour ambulatory (-3.70 [95% CI, -5.41 to -2.00] mm Hg), office (-4.76 [95% CI, -7.57 to -1.94] mm Hg), and home (-3.28 [95% CI, -5.96 to -0.61] mm Hg) systolic blood pressures was noted. In patients on antihypertensive medications, a significant reduction was observed in 24-hour ambulatory (-2.23 [95% CI, -3.56 to -0.90] mm Hg), office (-6.39 [95% CI, -11.49 to -1.30]), home (-6.08 [95% CI, -11.54 to -0.61] mm Hg), daytime (-2.62 [95% CI, -4.14 to -1.11]), and nighttime (-2.70 [95% CI, -5.13 to -0.27]) systolic blood pressures, as well as 24-hour ambulatory (-1.16 [95% CI, -1.96 to -0.35]), office (-3.17 [95% CI, -5.54 to -0.80]), and daytime (-1.47 [95% CI, -2.50 to -0.27]) diastolic blood pressures. RDN significantly lowers blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, in patients off and on antihypertensive medications, with a favorable safety profile. The efficacy of RDN was consistent in sham-controlled trials and contemporary trials using US Food and Drug Administration-approved devices.

Catheter-Based Renal Denervation Ready for the Management of Hypertension: Evidence, Challenges, and Perspectives.

Catheter-Based Renal Denervation Ready for the Management of Hypertension: Evidence, Challenges, and Perspectives.

Catheter-Based Radiofrequency Renal Denervation in the United States: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Based on Contemporary Evidence

BackgroundCatheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) has recently been approved as an adjunctive treatment for hypertensive patients without adequate blood pressure control. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of RF RDN in the United States based on contemporary clinical evidence. MethodsA decision-analytic Markov model projected costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and clinical events for an active cohort treated with RF RDN and a control cohort treated with standard-of-care (defined as 1, 2, or 3 antihypertensive medications). Cohort demographics and therapy effect were derived from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED study demonstrating an absolute 9.9 mm Hg reduction in office systolic blood pressure and 4.9 mm Hg reduction compared with sham control. Clinical event risk reduction from blood pressure lowering was based on a meta-regression of 47 hypertension trials. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was evaluated against willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50,000 per QALY (high value) and $150,000 per QALY (intermediate value). Extensive scenario and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess robustness of the findings. ResultsRF RDN yielded a significant risk reduction in clinical events (0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for myocardial infarction, and 0.85 for cardiovascular death over 10 years). Over lifetime, RF RDN added 0.34 QALY at an additional cost of $11,275, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $32,732 per QALY. The cost-effectiveness of RF RDN was robust across a broad range of scenarios and sensitivity analyses. ConclusionsBased on a lifetime projection, catheter-based RF RDN is a cost-effective, high-value intervention for hypertensive patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Hypertension and Device-Based Therapies for Resistant Hypertension: An Up-to-Date Review.

Hypertension is the most prevalent modifiable risk factor associated with cardiovascular mortality. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that hypertension directly or indirectly causes the death of at least nine million people globally every year. The number of people living with hypertension (blood pressure (BP) of ≥140 mmHg systolic or ≥90 mmHg diastolic or on medication) doubled between 1990 and 2019, from 650 million to 1.3 billion. Despite a plethora of antihypertensivedrugs widely available, a sizable part of the antihypertensive population stays uncontrolled. The unmet need of controlling BP in this population may be addressed, in part, by developing new drugs and devices/procedures to treat hypertension and its comorbidities. Several device-based approaches have been introduced to lower BP, and most of these strategies aim to modulate autonomic nervous system activity. Importantly, when considering a device-based treatment, each patient's underlying pathophysiology is considered, and the procedural risks are weighed against the cardiovascular risk attributed to the elevated BP.In November 2023, the FDA approved two renal denervation (RDN) devices. This manuscript discusses current interventional devices and procedures recently approved (RDN) and others in the clinical testing stage for arterial hypertension intervention or management.As we list below, all others have shown promising results and are being evaluated on a larger clinical trial.The new device-based classes are as follows: catheter-based RDN, baroreflex amplification, arteriovenous (AV) malformation, carotid body (CB) ablation, pacemaker-based cardiac neuromodulation, electro-acupuncture, and deep brain stimulation. Baroreflex amplification uses peripheral neuromodulation, while AV malformation leverages AV anastomosis. CB ablation modulates chemoreceptors, and pacemaker-based neuromodulation adjusts atrioventricular intervals. Electro-acupuncture proves potential, and deep brain stimulation offers central nervous system intervention.

Long-Term Blood Pressure Reductions Following Catheter-Based Renal Denervation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Long-Term Blood Pressure Reductions Following Catheter-Based Renal Denervation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effects of catheter-based renal denervation in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Several sham-controlled trials have investigated the efficacy and safety of catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) with mixed outcomes. To perform a comprehensive meta-analysis of all randomized, sham-controlled trials investigating RDN with first- and second-generation devices in hypertension. We searched MEDLINE and Cochrane Library for eligible trials. Outcomes included both efficacy (24-hour and office systolic [SBP] and diastolic blood pressure [DBP]) and safety (all-cause death, vascular complication, renal artery stenosis >70%, hypertensive crisis) of RDN. We performed a study-level, pairwise, random-effects meta-analysis of the summary data. Ten trials comprising 2,478 patients with hypertension while being either off- or on-treatment were included. Compared with sham, RDN reduced 24-hour and office systolic BP by 4.4 mmHg (95%CI -6.1, -2.7, p<0.00001) and 6.6 mmHg (95%CI -9.7, -3.6, p<0.0001), respectively. The 24-hour and office diastolic BP paralleled these findings (-2.6 mmHg, 95%CI - 3.6, -1.5, p<0.00001; -3.5 mmHg, 95%CI -5.4, -1.6, p=0.0003). There was no difference in 24-hour and office SBP reduction between trials with and without concomitant antihypertensive medication (p for interaction 0.62 and 0.73, respectively). There was no relevant difference concerning vascular complications (OR 1.69, 95%CI 0.57-5.0, p=0.34), renal artery stenosis (OR 1.50, 95%CI 0.06-36.97, p=0.80), hypertensive crisis (OR 0.65, 95%CI 0.30-1.38, p=0.26) and all-cause death (OR 1.76, 95%CI 0.34-9.20, p=0.50) between RDN and sham groups. Change of renal function based on eGFR was comparable between groups (p for interaction 0.84). There was significant heterogeneity between trials. RDN safely reduces ambulatory and office SBP/DBP vs. a sham procedure in the presence and absence of antihypertensive medication. What is new?Several sham-controlled trials have investigated the efficacy and safety of catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) with mixed outcomes.This comprehensive meta-analysis comprising 2,478 patients shows that irrespective of the utilized method (radiofrequency-, ultrasound-or alcohol-mediated), renal denervation effectively reduced ambulatory and office systolic blood pressure.Renal denervation exhibited no additional risk concerning vascular injury or renal function impairment.What are the clinical implications?This meta-analysis supports current guidelines/consensus statements that renal denervation represents an additive treatment option in carefully selected patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Catheter-Based Renal Artery Denervation

Catheter-Based Renal Artery Denervation

F-3 | The Effect Of Catheter-Based Renal Denervation On Cardiovascular Outcomes and Atrial Fibrillation In Recent Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review

F-3 | The Effect Of Catheter-Based Renal Denervation On Cardiovascular Outcomes and Atrial Fibrillation In Recent Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review

ENDOVASCULAR RADIOFREQUENCY RENAL DENERVATION IN DIFFICULT TO TREAT ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE

Objective: To assess safety and effectiveness of catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) for reduction of blood pressure (BP) in patients with difficult to treat arterial hypertension. Design and method: Thirtyfive patients selected with difficult to treat arterial hypertension, underwent RDN. Secondary forms of hypertension were excluded, and an appropriate renal artery anatomy was confirmed in all patients. Every patient underwent follow-up at 30 days, and then every 12 months, consisting in clinical examination, office BP measurements, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and biochemical analysis. At 12 months tansthoracic echocardiography and renal duplex sonography were performed. Results: The median value of systolic clinic BP decreased from 161 mmHg (25th-75th percentiles 158 - 191) at baseline to 144 mmHg (25th-75th percentiles 136 - 153) at follow up (p= 0.012), and the median value of diastolic clinic BP decreased from 102 mmHg (25th-75th percentiles 94 - 122) at baseline to 90 mmHg (25th-75th percentiles 78 - 99) at follow-up (p= 0.012). The number of medications changed from 5 (range 2-8) at baseline to 3.3 (range 0-6) at follow up. A significant decrease of left ventricular mass index from a median of 160 g/m2 (25th-75th percentiles 147 - 151) at baseline to 126 g/m2 (25th-75th percentiles 107 - 151) at follow-up (p= 0.043) was detected. The renal function did not demonstrate significant changes, however plasma renin activity and HOMA index were significantly reduced. No periprocedural or long term complications were observed. Conclusions: Our data confirm that RDN may constitute an effective and safe therapeutic choice for the treatment of difficult to treat hypertension.

Sympathetic Pathophysiology in Hypertension Origins: The Path to Renal Denervation.

The importance of the sympathetic nervous system in essential hypertension has been recognized in 2 eras. The first was in early decades of the 20th century, through to the 1960s. Here, the sympathetic nervous system was identified as a target for the treatment of hypertension, and an extensive range of antiadrenergic therapies were developed. Then, after a period of lapsed interest, in a second era from 1985 on, the development of precise measures of human sympathetic nerve firing and transmitter release allowed demonstration of the importance of neural mechanisms in the initiation and maintenance of the arterial blood pressure elevation in hypertension. This led to the development of a device treatment of hypertension, catheter-based renal denervation, which we will discuss.

Renal denervation in the management of hypertension.

Arterial hypertension is a global leading cause of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and renal disease, as well as mortality. Although pharmacotherapy is safe and effective in lowering blood pressure (BP) and cardiovascular disease risk, BP control remains poor, and the mortality rates associated with high BP have been steadily increasing. Device-based therapies have been investigated to overcome barriers to pharmacotherapy, including non-adherence and low rates of persistence to daily medications. Among these device-based therapies, catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) has been most extensively examined over the past 15 years. In this state-of-the-art article, we summarise the rationale for RDN, review the available evidence, provide recommendations for a safe procedure, and discuss the role of RDN in current guidelines and clinical practice.

Long-Term Blood Pressure Reductions Following Catheter-Based Renal Denervation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Renal denervation is a recognized adjunct therapy for hypertension with clinically significant blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects. Long-term follow-up data are critical to ascertain durability of the effect and safety. Aside from the 36-month follow-up data available from randomized control trials, recent cohort analyses extended follow-up out to 10 years. We sought to analyze study-level data and quantify the ambulatory BP reduction of renal denervation across contemporary randomized sham-controlled trials and available long-term follow-up data up to 10 years from observational studies. A systematic review was performed with data from 4 observational studies with follow-up out to 10 years and 2 randomized controlled trials meeting search and inclusion criteria with follow-up data out to 36 months. Study-level data were extracted and compared statistically. In 2 contemporary randomized controlled trials with 36-month follow-up, an average sham-adjusted ambulatory systolic BP reduction of -12.7±4.5 mm Hg from baseline was observed (P=0.05). Likewise, a -14.8±3.4 mm Hg ambulatory systolic BP reduction was found across observational studies with a mean long-term follow-up of 7.7±2.8 years (range, 3.5-9.4 years; P=0.0051). The observed reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate across the long-term follow-up was in line with the predicted age-related decline. Antihypertensive drug burden was similar at baseline and follow-up. Renal denervation is associated with a significant and clinically meaningful reduction in ambulatory systolic BP in both contemporary randomized sham-controlled trials up to 36 months and observational cohort studies up to 10 years without adverse consequences on renal function.

Ultra-long-term efficacy and safety of catheter-based renal denervation in resistant hypertension: 10-year follow-up outcomes

BackgroundRandomized sham-controlled trials have confirmed the efficacy and safety of catheter-based renal denervation in hypertension. Data on the very long-term effects of renal denervation are scarce.AimsThis study evaluates the 10-year safety and efficacy of renal denervation in resistant hypertension.MethodsThis prospective single-center study included patients with resistant hypertension undergoing radio-frequency renal denervation between 2010 and 2012. Office blood pressure, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure, antihypertensive medication, color duplex sonography, and renal function were assessed after 1-, 2- and 10-years.ResultsThirty-nine patients completed the 10-year follow-up (mean follow-up duration 9.4 ± 0.7 years). Baseline office and 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure were 164 ± 23 mmHg and 153 ± 16 mmHg, respectively. After 10 years, 24-h ambulatory and office systolic blood pressure were reduced by 16 ± 17 mmHg (P < 0.001) and 14 ± 23 mmHg (P = 0.001), respectively. The number of antihypertensive drugs remained unchanged from 4.9 ± 1.4 to 4.5 ± 1.2 drugs (P = 0.087). The estimated glomerular filtration rate declined within the expected range from 69 (95% CI 63 to 74) to 60 mL/min/1.73m2 (95% CI 53 to 68; P < 0.001) through 10-year follow-up. Three renal artery interventions were documented for progression of pre-existing renal artery stenosis in two patients and one patient with new-onset renal artery stenosis. No other adverse events were observed during the follow-up.ConclusionRenal denervation was safe and sustainedly reduced ambulatory and office blood pressure out to 10 years in patients with resistant hypertension.Graphical abstractLeft panel, Change in 24-h and office SBP. Right panel, eGFR over time. SBP, systolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Catheter-Based Ultrasound Renal Denervation in Patients with Resistant Hypertension: A Systematic Review

Background: The maintenance and development of hypertension are fundamentally dependent on renal sympathetic hyperactivity. Through regulation of the renal sympathetic nerves, catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation has been demonstrated to dramatically lower blood pressure (BP) in patients with resistant hypertension (systolic blood pressure 160 mm Hg on three or more antihypertensive medicines, including a diuretic). This study assessed a catheter-based ultrasound device of the next generation intended to maximize nerve coverage using circumferential ultrasound energy. This study's objective is to describe the results of renal denervation (RDN) in patients with resistant hypertension using a catheter-based ultrasonography device to measure blood pressure and safety. A potential new non-pharmacological therapy for resistant hypertension is renal denervation. Method: PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were thoroughly searched for relevant material. Throughout this meticulous process, the Rayyan QRCI was used. Results: our review included 10 studies with parameters including the period of study, age range of patients, office blood pressure, ambulatory blood pressure and the used approach. Clinical studies are required to determine whether this method is effective in treating this resistant hypertension. Conclusion: In individuals with resistant hypertension, catheter-based ultrasound renal denervation significantly and persistently lowers blood pressure and has no negative effects on renal function or renal artery anatomy.

Taming resistant hypertension: The promise of novel pharmacologic approaches and renal denervation.

Resistant hypertension is associated with an exceedingly high cardiovascular risk and there remains an unmet therapeutic need driven by pathophysiologic pathways unaddressed by guideline-recommended therapy. While spironolactone is widely considered as the preferable fourth-line drug, its broad application is limited by its side effect profile, especially off-target steroid receptor-mediated effects and hyperkalaemia in at-risk subpopulations. Recent landmark trials have reported promising safety and efficacy results for a number of novel compounds targeting relevant pathophysiologic pathways that remain unopposed by contemporary drugs. These include the dual endothelin receptor antagonist, aprocitentan, the aldosterone synthase inhibitor, baxdrostat and the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone. Furthermore, the evidence base for consideration of catheter-based renal denervation as a safe and effective adjunct therapeutic approach across the clinical spectrum of hypertension has been further substantiated. This review will summarise the recently published evidence on novel antihypertensive drugs and renal denervation in the context of resistant hypertension.