Categories Of Auditory Perception Research Articles

Association of Cochlear Implant Management Skills of Parents and Outcomes in Their Cochlear Implanted Wards: An Indian Perspective.

Parental involvement in the rehabilitation process is one of the critical factors for the success of cochlear implants in their wards. Skills to use a cochlear implant (CI) device appropriately and manipulate the different settings are essential to gain maximum benefits. There was a need to have a tool in Hindi to assess the skills of parents to manage the CI device. The study was conducted with the following aims: To translate and adapt Self-administered Cochlear Implant Management Skills (CIMSSelf) into the Hindi language. To find an association between the CI management skills of parents and outcomes in their implanted wards. To compare pre-post retraining scores on CIMS-self in Hindi (HN) and to find out factors affecting the scores. CIMS-self (English) was translated into Hindi using the forward and backward translation method. CIMS-self (HN) was administered to 22 parents of cochlear implanted children to evaluate their CI device management skills in the pretraining phase. The questionnaire was re-administered between 2 and 4weeks to check the reliability. The outcome of CI in the children was assessed using the test tools viz. Categories of Auditory Perception, Integrated Scales of Development, Speech Intelligibility Rating, and Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS). Subjects with less than 100% score received retraining on CI device management skills. CIMS-self (HN) was readministered two weeks after completing training, and results were compared between pre-post training sessions. There was no significant correlation between CIMS-self (HN) scores and demographic of the parents and their implanted wards, CI device factors, and clinical outcomes. A significant correlation was found between the CIMS-self (HN) and MAIS scores (p < .05). The Cronbach's alpha for test-retest reliability of the CIMS-self (HN) survey was 0.998. Participants showed a significant improvement in CIMS-self (HN) scores following the intervention, demonstrating that the CIMS-self (HN) is sensitive enough to detect changes in CI device management following retraining. A client who self-reports difficulty may benefit from consultation if it helps to improve their confidence in CI device management. The CIMS-self (HN) survey can be used to evaluate and re-evaluate CI device management skills at regular intervals and may save clinical time.

Comprehensive Prediction Model, Including Genetic Testing, for the Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation.

Despite growing interest in the genetic contribution to cochlear implant (CI) outcomes, only a few studies with limited samples have examined the association of CI outcomes with genetic etiologies. We analyzed CI outcomes using known predictors and genetic testing results to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the impact of genetic etiologies. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and images of patients who underwent cochlear implantation and genetic testing at a single tertiary medical institution, between May 2008 and December 2020. After excluding those whose speech test results were unavailable, and those in whom the implant was removed due to complications, such as infection or device failure, 203 patients were included in this study. The participants were categorized into adult (≥19 years), child (2-18 years), and infant (<24 months) groups. Outcomes were measured based on categories of auditory perception, monosyllable, disyllable, and sentence scores. For the infant group, the Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale score was used. Among the 203 participants, a causative genetic variant was identified in 117 (57.6%) individuals. The presence of a causative variant was significantly associated with better CI outcomes in the infant group (β = 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.01 to 0.47; p = 0.044), but not in the child and adult groups. In the genetically confirmed patients without cochlear malformation, genetic variants involving the spiral ganglion was a poor prognostic factor in the child group (β = -57.24; 95% confidence interval, -90.63 to -23.75; p = 0.004). The presence of known genetic etiology of hearing loss was associated with better CI outcomes in the infant group, but not in the child and adult groups. A neural-type genetic variant was a poor prognostic factor in the genetically diagnosed child subgroup without cochlear malformation. Careful genetic counseling should be performed before cochlear implantation.

Efficacy of cochlear implants in children with borderline hearing who have already achieved significant language development with hearing aids.

There are still debates about timing and effectiveness of cochlear implants (CI) in pediatric subjects with significant residual hearing who do not belong to traditional indication of CI. In this study, we aimed to investigate the outcomes of CI, specifically on improvement of pronunciation, among hearing-impaired children already with a substantial degree of language skills as evaluated by Categories of Auditory Perception (CAP) scores or sentence score. Our cohort comprised pediatric CI recipients from July 2018 through October 2020. Among them, cases with CAP scores of 5 or 6 preoperatively were defined as "borderline cases". We investigated prevalence and etiologies, and compared speech evaluation data preoperatively and postoperatively at three time points (3, 6 and 9-12 months after implantation). Among 86 pediatric CI recipients, 13 subjects (15.12%) had language development that reached CAP scores of 5 or 6 before implantation. Postoperative speech evaluation data 6 months after implantation revealed significant improvement of pronunciation (Urimal Test of Articulation and Phonation scores: UTAP), Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS) and word perception scores, but not of CAP and sentence perception scores. Notably, the significant improvement of pronunciation based on UTAP scores outstripped that of other speech parameters and this continued steadily up to one-year postoperatively. The result of the study serves as evidence for what to expect from cochlear implantation in hearing-impaired children who have already achieved a substantial degree of language development in terms of CAP scores or sentence perception scores, preoperatively.

Outcomes of Acoustic and Linguistic Performances Following Cochlear Implantation in Large Vestibular Aqueduct Syndrome (LVAS).

This study aims to collate the outcomes in acoustic and linguistic performances after cochlear implantation in LVAS. In a hospital-based prospective interventional study, seven prelingual children with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss(SNHL) with LVAS were recruited. They underwent unilateral cochlear implantation between December 2013 and December 2015 in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery at a tertiary care center. Outcomes of auditory and speech performances were assessed in the form of revised categories of auditory perception (CAP), infant toddler meaningful auditory integration scale (IT-MAIS) and speech intelligibility rating (SIR) scores preoperatively, at one and two years follow up. The mean age of implantation was 4years. The median revised CAP, IT-MAIS, and SIR scores after one and two years of follow-up were 6, 27, 3, and 11, 36, 5 respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 21.3months. Pre op median revised CAP, IT-MAIS, and SIR scores of 0, 1, 1 showed improvement to 11, 36, 5 at two years follow up which was statistically significant. Hence, we conclude that good functional outcomes post-operatively advocate the significance of cochlear implantation in LVAS.

Cochlear implantation in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): Outcomes and implant fitting characteristics

BackgroundLittle is known regarding fitting parameters and receptive and expressive language development in cochlear-implanted children (CCI) with profound sensorineural hearing loss (SHL) who are diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The aim of the study was to evaluate a group of ASD CCI users in order to describe their ASD clinical features and CCI outcomes; report on the average electrical charge requirements; and evaluate the possible correlations between electrical and psychophysical outcomes with ASD characteristics. Materials and methodsA multicentre observational study of 22 ASD children implanted in four cochlear implant (CI) centers. Data concerning profound SHL diagnosis, ASD diagnosis, CI timing and CI compliance were collected. Sound Field (SF) was assessed through repeated behavioural measurements. Categories of Auditory Perception (CAP) and Categories of Language (CL) were used to evaluate speech perception and language skills at short (≤2 yrs), medium (5 yrs) and long term (>10 yrs) follow-up. Fitting parameters such as comfortable thresholds, pulse-width (pw, μsec) and clinical units converted into units of charge/phase were collected. The diagnosis of ASD was acquired by the referral neuropsychiatric department and severity was assessed through the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V) and the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). ResultsAt the final follow-up session the median SF threshold for CI outcomes was 30 dB HL (min 15 – max 60). CAP score was extremely variable: 45.5% showed no improvement over time and only 22% of children reached CAP scores of 5–7. CL 45.5% showed no improvement over time and score was 1–2 in the majority of ASD children (72.7%), while only 18.2% reached the highest level of language skills. There were no statistically significant differences at each follow-up between subjects with or without comorbidities. CAP and CL were inversely correlated with DSM-V A and B domains, corresponding to lower speech and language scores in children with more severe ASD symptoms, and maintained their correlation at mid and long follow-ups whilst controlling for age at CI. Electrical charge requirements did not correlate with SF or age at implant but did inversely correlate with ASD severity. With regards to CI compliance: only 13.6% children (3) with severe DSM-V A/B levels and CARS score were partial/intermittent users. ConclusionThe present study is a targeted contribution to the current literature to support clinical procedures for CI fitting and audiological follow-up in children with ASD. The findings indicate that the outcomes of CI use and the fitting procedures are both influenced by the severity of the ASD symptoms rather than the demographic variables or associated disorders.

Effectiveness of Cochlear Implant in Children with Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss Below Poverty Line in Rural India: A Longitudinal Study

The <i>objective</i> of the study was to measure the effectiveness of the aided auditory threshold and speech-language performance of children with cochlear implant use longer than 4 years in North-East region of rural India. <i>Study design</i>- A longitudinal study of ninety-three children with mean age of 3.8 years with standard deviation (SD) of 0.9 years (61 males and 32 females) with unilateral cochlear implant below poverty line in rural India and with 2 years intervention of post implant auditory verbal therapy were included in the study. This study was based on the assessment of outcomes of unilateral Cochlear Implantation while reviewing various measuring scoring systems like Categories of Auditory perception (CAP), Milestones for early communication development, Receptive Expressive Emergent Language Skill (REELS), Auditory Skills Checklist (ASC); for articulation assessment- available articulation test in local language and spontaneous speech sample and Aided audiogram thresholds. The <i>results</i> on the average of the post operative auditory global threshold (T0) just after cochlear implantation was 33.53±8.91dBSPL and after continuously using 4 years cochlear implant for auditory global threshold was 32.56±6.43dBSPL. The ASC revealed 46% were able to comprehend, CAP findings shows there is a significant difference (p=0.039, at p<0.05 level) in the auditory skills based on duration of hearing aid use before implantation. The difference between hearing aid user and non-hearing aid user was significant (p=0.034, p<0.05). The differences in the performance of children with Digisonic SP implantees group and Nucleus freedom implantees group in terms of aided auditory threshold and speech-language performance were not significant. Cochlear implant with auditory verbal therapy under ADIP scheme is evidence based treatment for children with profound hearing loss for speech and language acquisition and best hearing performance. This increased access to mainstream education, greater opportunities for employment, societal and economic benefits. In conclusion cochlear implant was beneficial to children with profound hearing loss, contributing to hearing performance and speech-language acquisition. However, there were indications of challenges with certain aspects of language, specifically receptive vocabulary and expressive grammar, suggested requirement of longer period intervention of post implant auditory verbal therapy. The results obtained seem to remain stable over the years.

Outcomes of Hearing Aid and Cochlear Implantation in Case of Congenital Non-Syndromic Bilateral Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss: An Observational Study.

This study was done to measure the outcomes of hearing aid (HA) and cochlear implantation (CI) in case of congenital non syndromic severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) by using aided audiometry (AA), categories of auditory perception (CAP) score and speech intelligibility rating (SIR) scale. The objectives were to find out the effective management options available for bilateral severe to profound SNHL, to study the impact of age of CI on language development and to study the outcome of HA and CI. Patients with congenital severe to profound SNHL were included in the study. Initially the case history of the participants was taken then they underwent audiological tests to confirm hearing loss. To assess the outcomes of HA and CI, they were initially fitted with high gain digital behind the ear HA, then underwent auditory verbal therapy for twelve months, after that AA, CAP and SIR test done to measure the outcomes of HA and similar hierarchy followed for CI. The results showed that with HA, the benefit is very limited whereas with CI the benefit is significant. The average SIR score of HA and CI are 1 and 3.16 and average CAP score are 0.83 and 7.8 respectively. The study shows that the CI is one of the most effective management options available for severe to profound SNHL and found that early intervention followed by early detection of hearing loss helps in achieving better speech and language skills.

Impact of the Surgical Approach: A Comparative Study between Transcanal and Posterior Tympanotomy Approach for Cochlear Implantation

Abstract Introduction The aim of our study is to compare the surgical complications of the transcanal and posterior tympanotomy approach and to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of both techniques. Materials and Methods It is a prospective study involving 252 pediatric cochlear implant patients operated in the Department of ENT, GMERS Medical College and General Hospital, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India. Out of these, 126 patients were operated by transcanal approach (group A) and 126 patients were operated by posterior tympanotomy approach (group B). Results No significant difference in the mean duration of surgery (p &gt; 0.064) was observed in both the groups. Major complications occurred in 60.2% of group A and 3.1% of group B and minor complications occurred in 65% of group A and 3.1% in group B, which is highly significant (p &lt; 0.0134). The categories of auditory perception, speech intelligibility rating scales, meaningful auditory integration scale, and meaningful use of speech scale were assessed in both groups. Conclusion Complication rate in the transcanal approach is higher as compared with posterior tympanotomy approach. A complete alignment and introduction of electrode array into the basal turn of cochlea is more favorable in the posterior tympanotomy approach. Transcanal technique even as an alternative may not be useful. Outcomes may be affected depending upon the technique chosen.

Auditory Performance in Late Implanted Congenitally Hearing Impaired Children: A Reality Check

The present study aimed at determining auditory performance in children with congenital hearing impairment who underwent cochlear implant surgery unilaterally at or after age of 5years. Study also aimed at studying association of factors such as chronological age (CA), implant age (IA), age at implantation (AAI), hearing age (HA), parental support, compliance to therapy, mode of therapy and parental satisfaction with auditory performance. It is a retrospective study. Files of 41 participants who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were reviewed for scores of Revised categories of auditory perception (CAP), Listening skills scale (LSS) and Speech intelligibility rating (SIR) along with other factors. Only 20 participants with complete data were included in the study. Researcher rated parental support and compliance to therapy while parental satisfaction was noted prospectively using a single yes-no type question. Participants showed improvement on CAP, LSS, SIR however they did not reach normal or near normal scores. CAP and LSS did not correlate with CA nor AAI or with IA. However CAP and LSS showed significant correlation with HA. SIR showed significant correlation with CA, AAI, IA and HA. Good auditory performance was associated with parental support and compliance to therapy but not with mode of therapy offered. 17 out of 20 parents were satisfied with outcomes of cochlear implant. Late implanted children showed improved auditory performance with implantation when they had previous hearing aid experience and parent support and compliance to therapy though they did not reach normal levels.

The effect of canal diameter on audiologic results in patients with cochlear implantation with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome.

To compare audiologic results according to vestibular aqueduct (VA) diameter in patients who have undergone cochlear implantation and were diagnosed with LVAS. This was a retrospective study detailing the outcomes of 18 patients with LVAS and 18 patients undergone cochlear implants. VA diameter was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Categories of Auditory Perception (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) were assessed in all patients, and speech audiometry, including speech recognition thresholds (SRT) and word discrimination scores, was applied for all subjects who were able to perform these tests. All audiologic parameters were compared between patients with and without LVAS, and the relationship of these parameters with VA diameter was investigated. The control group consisted of 18 subjects (5 males, 13 females), ranging in age between 2 and 34years (mean 13.17 ± 8.97years). The research group consisted of 18 subjects (8 males, 10 females), ranging in age between 2 and 35years (mean 13.28 ± 8.96years). There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of SIR and CAP pre-post differences (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05), with higher averages in the LVAS group. No statistically significant correlations were found between VA diameter on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging and the audiologic variables collected. Patients with LVAS benefit from cochlear implant surgery and VA parameters do not affect audiologic parameters.

Effects of Residual Hearing on the Auditory Steady State Response for Cochlear Implantation in Children.

Background and ObjectivesWe aim to explore the effects of residual auditory steady state response (ASSR) on cochlear implantation (CI) outcomes in children lacking auditory brainstem responses (ABRs). Subjects and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of child CI recipients lacking ABRs. All ears were divided into two groups: with residual ASSR and without ASSR. For each frequency, the T- and C-levels and the electrical dynamic ranges of postoperative 3-month and 1-year mappings were compared between the groups. To evaluate speech perception, patients who received simultaneous bilateral CIs were divided into two groups: group 1 exhibited responses at all frequencies in both ears; in group 2, at least one ear evidenced no response. The Categories of Auditory Perception (CAP) and Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS) scores were compared between the groups. ResultsWe enrolled 16 patients. At 2 kHz, the postoperative 3-month and 1-year T-levels of patients with residual hearing were lower than those of hearing loss group (p=0.001, p=0.035). In residual hearing group, the ASSR threshold correlated positively with the postoperative 1-year T-level (p=0.012, R2 =0.276) and C-level (p=0.002, R2 =0.374). Of 10 simultaneous bilateral CI recipients, 5 exhibited ASSRs at all frequencies and the other 5 showed no response at ≥1 frequency. The latter had higher CAP scores at the postoperative 1-year (p=0.018). ConclusionsIn children exhibiting hearing loss in ABR testing, residual hearing at 2 kHz ASSR correlated positively with the post-CI T-level. Those with ASSRs at all frequencies had significantly lower CAP scores at the postoperative 1year. CI should not be delayed when marginal residual hearing is evident in ASSR.

Outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations.

To evaluate the surgical experience and auditory functions and progress of speech development of cochlear implantation in malformed ears. Between November 1995 and July 2017, thirty-seven patients (26 females and 11 males; mean age: 138.275 ± 96.24months) with diverse anomalies of the inner ear were retrospectively examined for surgical and audiological results. Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR), Categories of Auditory Perception (CAP), Pure Tone Average (PTA), Speech Intelligibility Rating (SRT), and Word Discrimination Score (WDS) were the audiological tests used to evaluate the efficacy of CI in the malformed inner ears. CSF gusher was experienced by six patients (three with LVA (large vestibular aqueduct), one with IP (incomplete partition) I, and two with both IP II Mondini malformations and LVA). Two patients had transient facial paresis after surgery. All patients fully recovered within 6months. The postoperative PTA, SRT, and WDS test results showed significant differences between progressive and congenital sensorineural hearing loss (p values < 0.05 for all). On the other hand, the postoperative CAP and SIR test results revealed no significant differences between the two groups. According to etiology, the PTA and SRT values were significantly lower in common cavity patients than the LVA patients (p values < 0.01); no significant differences were found among the other etiological groups. Cochlear implantation is safe in children with inner ear malformations. However, the success rate is low compared to patients with normal anatomy in terms of audiological results; the most successful group of patients with inner ear malformation is large vestibular aqueduct.

Effects of radiological abnormalities in temporal bone and brain on auditory outcomes in cochlear implant recipient children

Introduction: Cochlear implantation (CI) is used for rehabilitation of children with bilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. Recently, treatment of such children has been influenced by diagnostic technological advances. Multiple radiological abnormalities detected in temporal bone and brain are now increasingly included for CI. The primary aim of this study was to determine the effects of “radiological abnormalities in temporal bone or brain” on CI outcome. Aim: The primary aim of this study was to determine the effects of “radiological abnormalities in high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) temporal bone or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain” on CI outcome. Study Design: Prospective study. Setting: Tertiary care center. Materials and Methods: In this study, we evaluated fifty cochlear-implanted children from October 2011 to March 2013. The case group consisted of 15 (30%) children with radiological abnormalities and control group consisted of 35 (70%) children with no radiological abnormalities in HRCT temporal bone or MRI brain. All patients received auditory and speech rehabilitation, and their auditory perception outcomes 1 year after CI were evaluated. The children were assessed by categories of auditory perception (CAP) and Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS) tests. Results: There was significant reduction in mean auditory perception outcomes (decreased 6.9% mean CAP and 5.4% mean MAIS scores) at 1 year post-CI in CI recipients who had radiological abnormalities, in comparison to those who had no radiological abnormalities in temporal bone or brain (P

Dysmorphic features and cochlear implantation outcome in children with sensorineural hearing loss; the headmost study

Introduction: Recently, treatment of children with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) has been influenced by diagnostic improvements and technological treatment advances, specifically new cochlear implant prospects. Multiple handicaps children and children with syndromes and conditions resulting disabilities, such as dual sensory loss, cerebral palsy, somatic abnormalities, and autistic spectrum disorder, are now not routinely precluded from receiving a cochlear implant. The primary aim of this study was to determine the effects of dysmorphic feature on cochlear implant outcome. Materials and Methods: In this cohort study, we evaluated 336 cochlear implanted children from 2007 to 2009. The case group consists of 53 patients (15/7%) with dysmorphic features and control group consisted at 53 patients with normal features and without behavioral and developmental disorders. All patients received auditory and speech rehabilitation and we evaluated their speech and auditory outcome. One year after cochlear implantation, the patient was assessed by categories of auditory perception (CAP) and speech intelligibility rating (SIR) tests. Results: We included 106 out of 336 cochlear implanted children, with the mean age of 30.42 ± 12.16 (maximum 48 months), 52 cases (49.1%) were girls and 54 (50.9%) were boys. There was a significant difference in SIR between case and control groups (3.26 ± 0.98) versus (4.06 ± 0.94) (P

Impact of socioeconomic factors on paediatric cochlear implant outcomes

ObjectivesThe study was aimed at evaluating the impact of certain socioeconomic factors such as family income, level of parents' education, distance between the child's home and auditory verbal therapy clinic, and age of the child at implantation on postoperative cochlear implant outcomes. MethodsChildren suffering from congenital bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss and a chronologic age of 4 years or younger at the time of implantation were included in the study. Children who were able to complete a prescribed period of a 1-year follow-up were included in the study. These children underwent cochlear implantation surgery, and their postoperative outcomes were measured and documented using categories of auditory perception (CAP), meaningful auditory integration (MAIS), and speech intelligibility rating (SIR) scores. Children were divided into three groups based on the level of parental education, family income, and distance of their home from the rehabilitation-- auditory verbal therapy clinic. ResultsA total of 180 children were studied. The age at implantation had a significant impact on the postoperative outcomes, with an inverse correlation. The younger the child's age at the time of implantation, the better were the postoperative outcomes. However, there were no significant differences among the CAP, MAIS, and SIR scores and each of the three subgroups. Children from families with an annual income of less than $7,500, between $7,500 and $15,000, and more than $15,000 performed equally well, except for significantly higher SIR scores in children with family incomes more than $15,000. Children with of parents who had attended high school or possessed a bachelor's or Master's master's degree had similar scores, with no significant difference. Also, distance from the auditory verbal therapy clinic failed to have any significantimpact on a child's performance. DiscussionThese results have been variable, similar to those of previously published studies. A few of the earlier studies concurred with our results, but most of the studies had suggested that children in families of higher socioeconomic status had have better speech and language acquisition. ConclusionsCochlear implantation significantly improves auditory perception and speech intelligibility of children suffering from profound sensorineural hearing loss. Younger The younger the age at implantation, the better are the results. Hence, early implantation should be promoted and encouraged. Our study suggests that children who followed the designated program of postoperative mapping and auditory verbal therapy for a minimum period of 1 year seemed to do equally well in terms of hearing perception and speech intelligibility, irrespective of the socioeconomic status of the family. Further studies are essential to assess the impact of these factors on long-term speech acquisition andlanguage development.

Cochlear Implantation in Patients With CHARGE Syndrome.

To determine the optimal surgical approach for cochlear implantation (CI) preoperatively based on the spatial relation of a displaced facial nerve (FN) and middle ear structures and to analyze clinical outcomes of CHARGE syndrome. Facial nerve displacement and associated deviation of inner ear structures were analyzed in 13 patients (17 ears) with CHARGE syndrome who underwent CI. Surgical accessibility through the facial recess was assessed based on anatomical landmarks. Postoperative speech performance and associated clinical characteristics were analyzed. The most consistently identified ear anomalies were semicircular canal aplasia (100%), ossicular anomaly (100%), and vestibular hypoplasia (88%). Facial nerve displacement was found in 77% of cases (anteroinferior: 47%, anterior: 24%, inferior: 6%). The width of available surgical space around facial recess was significantly greater in cases of facial recess approach (2.85 ± 0.9 mm) than those of alternative approach (0.12 ± 0.29 mm, P = .02). Postoperatively, 53% achieved better than category 4 on the categories of auditory perception (CAP) scale. The CAP category was significantly correlated with internal auditory canal diameter (P = .025) and did not differ according to the applied surgical approach. Preoperative determination of surgical accessibility through facial recess would be useful for safe surgical approach, and successful hearing rehabilitation was achievable by applying appropriate surgical approaches.

Communication outcomes following cochlear implantation in a child with cystic cochleovestibular anomaly

Cochlear implantation is one of the best amongst the various management options available for children and adults with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. Inner ear and internal auditory canal (IAC) malformations accounts to approximately 25% of congenital sensorineural hearing loss in children. The primary goal of this report was to evaluate the communication outcomes after cochlear implantation in a child with cystic cochleovestibular anomaly (CCVA). The child was evaluated through various standardized outcome measures at regular intervals to track the progress in terms of auditory and spoken language skills. The scores on Categories of Auditory Perception (CAP), Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS), Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR), Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS), and listening and spoken language skills showed a significant leap in 12 months duration post implantation. The report thus highlights and correlates the significant progress in auditory and spoken language skills of the child with congenital malformations to appropriate auditory rehabilitation and intensive parental training.

Timing of Surgical Intervention with Cochlear Implant in Patients with Large Vestibular Aqueduct Syndrome

Objectives(1) To report the speech perception and intelligibility results of Mandarin-speaking patients with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome (LVAS) after cochlear implantation (CI); (2) to compare their performance with a group of CI users without LVAS; (3) to understand the effects of age at implantation and duration of implant use on the CI outcomes. The obtained data may be used to guide decisions about CI candidacy and surgical timing.MethodsForty-two patients with LVAS participating in this study were divided into two groups: the early group received CI before 5 years of age and the late group after 5. Open-set speech perception tests (on Mandarin tones, words and sentences) were administered one year after implantation and at the most recent follow-up visit. Categories of auditory perception (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scale scores were also obtained. ResultsThe patients with LVAS with more than 5 years of implant use (18 cases) achieved a mean score higher than 80% on the most recent speech perception tests and reached the highest level on the CAP/SIR scales. The early group developed speech perception and intelligibility steadily over time, while the late group had a rapid improvement during the first year after implantation. The two groups, regardless of their age at implantation, reached a similar performance level at the most recent follow-up visit.ConclusionHigh levels of speech performance are reached after 5 years of implant use in patients with LVAS. These patients do not necessarily need to wait until their hearing thresholds are higher than 90 dB HL or PB word score lower than 40% to receive CI. They can do it “earlier” when their speech perception and/or speech intelligibility do not reach the performance level suggested in this study.

Bilateral cochlear implantation in children: Localization and hearing in noise benefits

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to report speech performance in quiet and in noise, sound localization with cochlear implanted children bilaterally. Their performances were compared also in unilateral conditions. In addition, speech and language evaluation was analyzed. MethodsTwenty-three children implanted with Neurelec Digisonic SP devices in 3 tertiary centres were tested on a battery of speech perception tests in quiet and in noise. Localization was assessed by lateralization tasks (90° and 30°). Progress in speech and language development and subjective assessment of benefit were assessed using several rating scales and questionnaires (categories of auditory perception, speech intelligibility rating, family participating rating scale). ResultsChildren scored better when tested in bilateral conditions rather than in unilateral conditions. In quiet, the mean scores for the poorer and better side were 52% and 73%, respectively. In the bilateral condition, the mean score increased to 83%. In noise, the mean scores were 39% and 57% respectively, which increased to a mean of 70% in the bilateral condition. Nine children (<9 years) completed the ±90° lateralization task. For both unilateral conditions performance was not significantly different from chance level. In the bilateral condition, the mean score was 86%. The ±30° lateralization score was completed by eight of the older children (>9 years). The scores in the unilateral conditions were closed to chance level, but significantly better in the bilateral condition (mean of 86%). ConclusionsPerformances in bilateral conditions were significantly better than in unilateral conditions on speech perception in quiet and in noise. Localization was significantly better when tested in the bilateral condition for ±90° lateralization task for the younger children and the ±30° task for the older children. All these results supported the hypothesis than bilateral cochlear implantation is more beneficial than unilateral implantation in children.