Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer Research Articles

The Effect of Apalutamide on Thyroid Function in Prostate Cancer Patients

Abstract Context Apalutamide (APT) is a nonsteroidal anti-androgen medication used to treat metastatic castrate sensitive and non-metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Early clinical trials of APT identified thyroid dysfunction as a common adverse effect of therapy, but the clinical presentation and management of APT-induced hypothyroidism has not been studied. Methods We report a case series of 16 patients with APT-associated thyroid dysfunction during prostate cancer treatment at two academic medical centers. Patient clinical parameters, thyroid function laboratory data, and thyroid hormone requirements over the course of APT treatment were analyzed. Results Among the 16 patients in our case series with APT-associated hypothyroidism, 3 had no prior thyroid disease and 13 had pre-existing hypothyroidism. The patterns of thyroid dysfunction included overt and subclinical hypothyroidism. The median time from APT initiation to thyroid function test abnormality was 19 weeks, but occurred in some cases as early as 2-4 weeks. Hypothyroidism was effectively managed with thyroid hormone replacement using levothyroxine (LT4), though some patients with pre-existing hypothyroidism required a 2- to 3-fold dose increase while on APT to achieve euthyroid state. In the subset of patients who completed or stopped APT therapy, TSH fell at a median of 11 weeks post-APT therapy and thyroid hormone requirements decreased to near pre-APT levels. Conclusion APT-associated thyroid dysfunction presents as new or worsening hypothyroidism and should prompt initiation or increase in thyroid hormone replacement. Monitoring of thyroid function tests is recommended every 1-2 months for all patients on APT and 2-3 months after completion of APT.

Prognostic outcomes in Japanese patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: Comparative assessments between conventional androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and ADT with novel androgen receptor signal inhibitor.

The objective of this study was to compare the prognostic outcomes between metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) patients receiving conventional androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and those receiving ADT plus a novel androgen-receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) in routine clinical practice in Japan. This was conducted as a retrospective multicenter study including 581 mCSPC patients, consisting of 305 receiving ADT alone or in combination with bicalutamide (group 1) and 276 receiving ADT plus one of the following ARSIs: abiraterone acetate, apalutamide, or enzalutamide (group 2). Prognostic outcomes between these 2 groups were comprehensively compared. In the entire cohort, prostate-specific antigen-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) in group 2 was significantly longer than that in group 1, while no significant difference was noted in overall survival (OS) between the two groups. In patients corresponding to the LATITUDE high-risk group, however, both PSA-PFS and OS in group 2 were significantly longer than those in group 1. Of several factors examined, the following were identified as independent predictors of poor PSA-PFS in the entire cohort as well as the LATITUDE high-risk group: high C-reactive protein, high lactate dehydrogenase, high alkaline phosphatase, high Gleason score, and group 1. Furthermore, it was possible to precisely classify both the entire cohort and LATITUDE high-risk group into 3 risk groups regarding PSA-PFS according to the positive numbers of independent factors: positive for ≤1 factor, favorable; 2 factors, intermediate; and ≥3 factors, poor. Combined use of ARSIs with ADT could improve the prognostic outcomes of mCSPC patients, particularly those in the LATITUDE high-risk group, in real-world clinical practice in Japan.

A Real World Observational Study Characterizing Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated With or Without Androgen Receptor-Pathway-Inhibitor Therapies in Alberta, Canada

BackgroundData are needed to improve the current understanding of clinical management and characteristics of patients with advanced prostate cancer (PC) treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibition (ARPI) therapy. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study using real-world, population-level data from Alberta, Canada included all individuals diagnosed in 2017-2020 with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive PC (mCSPC) or nonmetastatic castration-resistant PC (nmCRPC) who initiated androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). For mCSPC, patients were classified as ARPI-exposed if they received an ARPI within 180 days of initiating ADT, while patients with nmCRPC were classified as ARPI-exposed if they received an ARPI within 2 years of diagnosis. ResultsThis study included 976 patients with mCSPC and 233 with nmCRPC of which 33.5% and 25.3% received an ARPI, respectively. The proportion of patients with mCSPC treated with an ARPI increased considerably for patients diagnosed in 2020 compared to 2017 (56.2% vs. 6.0%). In contrast, the use of ARPI to treat nmCRPC only increased marginally from 2017 to 2019/2020 (19.7% vs. 28.9%). Patients with mHSPC who were ARPI-exposed had longer median survival than patients who were ARPI-naive 38.47 (95% CI = 32.84-NA). vs. 34.19 (95% CI = 33.33-38.83; P = .03), with a higher proportion of patients surviving to 2-years. For nmCRPC, survival was similar between ARPI-exposed and ARPI-naive. In multivariable analyses, receiving ARPI for mCSPC was associated with younger patient age, more recent diagnoses, fewer comorbidities, a higher number of metastatic sites, referral to a medical oncologist as well as receiving surgery and radiation before ADT. Receiving ARPI for nmCRPC was associated with referral to a medical oncologist, younger age, and more recent diagnoses. ConclusionsOutcome analyses in this population suggest a continued unmet clinical need and complex clinical management pathways. Given that treatment pathways have evolved considerably, continued follow-up to understand the impact of these advancements on patient outcomes are warranted.

Atypical Pulmonary Metastasis of Prostate Adenocarcinoma: A Rare Phenomenon.

Lymphangitic metastasis of prostate cancer to the lung with diffuse reticulonodular infiltrate is a rare presentation.In chemical castration-sensitive prostate cancer, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels can be improving but the patient can still develop new distant metastases.

Creatine supplementation and resistance training to preserve muscle mass and attenuate cancer progression (CREATINE-52): a protocol for a double-blind randomized controlled trial

BackgroundMuscle mass is important for metastatic prostate cancer survival and quality of life (QoL). The backbone of treatment for men with metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) is androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with an androgen signaling inhibitor. ADT is an effective cancer treatment, but it facilitates significant declines in muscle mass and adverse health outcomes important to mCSPC survivors, such as fatigue, and reductions in physical function, independence, insulin sensitivity, and QoL. In non-metastatic CSPC survivors, resistance training (RT) preserves muscle mass and improves these related health outcomes, but the biggest barrier to RT in CSPC survivors of all stages is fatigue. Creatine monohydrate supplementation coupled with RT (Cr + RT) may address this barrier since creatine plays a critical role in energy metabolism. Cr + RT in cancer-free older adults and other clinical populations improves muscle mass and related health outcomes. Evidence also suggests that creatine supplementation can complement cancer treatment. Thus, Cr + RT is a strategy that addresses gaps in survivorship needs of people with mCSPC. The purpose of this parallel, double-blind randomized controlled trial is to test the effects of 52-weeks of Cr + RT compared with placebo (PLA) and RT (PLA + RT) on muscle mass, other related health outcomes, and markers of cancer progression.MethodsWe will carry out this trial with our team’s established, effective, home-based, telehealth RT program in 200 mCSPC survivors receiving ADT, and evaluate outcomes at baseline, 24-, and 52-weeks. RT will occur twice weekly with elastic resistance bands, and an established creatine supplementation protocol will be used for supplementation delivery. Our approach addresses a major facilitator to RT in mCSPC survivors, a home-based RT program, while utilizing a supervised model for safety.DiscussionFindings will improve delivery of comprehensive survivorship care by providing a multicomponent, patient-centered lifestyle strategy to preserve muscle mass, improve health outcomes, and complement cancer treatment (NCT06112990).

Prostate cancer across four countries in the Middle East: a multi-centre, observational, retrospective and prognostic study.

Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most prevalent cancer in males, with a steadily increasing incidence in the Middle East (ME). The aim of this study was to capture real-world data on the characteristics, disease progression, and treatment patterns among PC patients in the ME. This was a retrospective, observational, multi-centre study conducted across ten hospitals/research centers in Lebanon, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Kuwait. Data were abstracted from medical records of 615 male patients who were diagnosed with PC between January 2012 and the site initiation date (December 2018-May 2019) and received at least one PC treatment/intervention. The observation period ranged between 84 and 88 months. Data were collected on demographics, clinical characteristics, time to progression to the subsequent clinical state or therapy (progression from localised/locally advanced PC to castration and to metastatic PC (metastatic castration-sensitive PC (mCSPC) or metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC)), progression from mCSPC to mCRPC, and mCRPC patients' progression to first subsequent line of therapy), treatment patterns, and mortality. Most patients had localised/locally advanced PC (57.7%), followed by mCSPC (37.4%), and mCRPC (4.1%) at the time of inclusion in the study. Most patients were at tumours, nodes and metastases (TNM) stage IIIa (40.1%) or TNM stage IVb (27.8%) at study entry. Median time to metastatic disease, castration-resistance and next line therapy was 84 months (95% CI: 68-84), 41 months (95% CI: 30-56) and 7 months (95% CI: 0-41), respectively. The mortality rate was 3.6%. Disease progression was most common among patients with mCSPC (35.1%) or mCRPC (14.8%), and treatment discontinuation was most common among patients with mCRPC (36.6% treatments discontinued). The results show that most patients were at an advanced TNM stage at study entry, suggestive of a lack of awareness regarding PC. Disease progression was most common among patients with metastatic disease, reflecting the challenge of treating metastatic disease and highlighting the need for novel treatments.

Current Systemic Therapy in Men with Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

This review aims to explore the evolving landscape of treatments available for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) patients. In less than a decade, evidence was chronologically provided that (1) systemic treatment intensification with docetaxel improves outcomes, including survival, in men with mCSPC, (2) then that these outcomes are also improved when a second-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) is combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and (3) using a "triplet systemic therapy," which consists in the combination of ADT, an ARPI and docetaxel, further improves outcomes, including survival. Radiotherapy to the prostate combined with ADT alone is now recommended in men with low-volume mCSPC. Combining prostate radiotherapy and intensified systemic treatment including abiraterone may be synergistic as suggested in the PEACE-1 trial. Also, the role of metastases-directed local therapies (mostly stereotactic radiotherapy) is currently being assessed in phase 3 trials. Finally, the integration of biomarkers (e.g. BRCA2 gene alterations, PTEN loss, PSMA expression) for decision making is not currently established, though trials are also currently underway. Importantly, most evidence currently available was obtained in men with de novo metastases, while for those with metastatic relapse after definitive local treatment, the role of treatment intensification is less well established. Treatment intensification is nowadays the standard of care for patients with de novo mCSPC as it leads to outcomes improvement, including survival, and the standard of care is evolving almost on a yearly basis.

Role of enzalutamide in primary and recurrent non-metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer: a systematic review of prospective clinical trials.

Enzalutamide, a second-generation androgen receptor inhibitor, is indicated for the treatment of metastatic disease, as well as in the treatment of non-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (PCa). This systematic review aims to determine outcomes and toxicity in patients with non-metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer (nmCSPC) treated with enzalutamide in the primary or salvage settings. We performed a systematic review focusing on the role of Enzalutamide in the treatment of nmCSPC, using the PubMed/Medline database. Articles focusing on androgen receptor inhibitors in nmCSPC were included, while articles discussing exclusively metastatic or castration-resistant PCa were excluded. The initial search retrieved 401 articles, of which 15 underwent a thorough assessment for relevance. Ultimately, 12 studies with pertinent outcomes were meticulously examined. Among these, seven studies were dedicated to the investigation of enzalutamide in the primary setting, while the remaining five publications specifically addressed its use in salvage settings. Regardless of the treatment setting, our data revealed two distinct therapeutic strategies. The first advocates for the substitution of enzalutamide for androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), based on the premise of achieving equivalent, if not superior, oncological outcomes while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. The second, adopting a more conventional approach, entails augmenting the effectiveness of ADT by incorporating enzalutamide. Enzalutamide has considerable potential as a therapeutic strategy for nmCSPC, either used alone or in combination with ADT in the primary or in the salvage settings. The use of enzalutamide instead of ADT is an appealing strategy. However, more trials will be required to further understand the efficacy and side-effect profile of enzalutamide monotherapy.

Psoas mass index at the level of the third lumbar vertebra on computed tomography is a prognostic predictor for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer.

Computed tomography-defined low skeletal muscle mass is associated with oncological outcomes in patients with prostate cancer. However, its association with the outcomes of hormone-treated metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer remains unclear. We aimed to determine the association between metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer and psoas muscle parameters. We retrospectively reviewed 121 patients with N1 and/or M1 metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer who underwent primary androgen deprivation therapy between 2005 and 2021, either by administration of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist/antagonist or by surgical castration accompanied by bicalutamide, a first-generation antiandrogen. Before treatment administration, the psoas muscle index at the level of the third lumbar vertebra (psoas muscle area [cm2]/height2 [m2]) and the mean Hounsfield units of the psoas muscle were evaluated using non-contrast computed tomography and in relation to oncological outcomes. The median follow-up was 56.9months. Furthermore, during follow-up, 82 (67.7%) and 53 (43.8%) patients progressed to castration-resistant prostate cancer and died, respectively. Multivariate analysis of castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival and overall survival showed significant differences in the Gleason score, clinical N-stage, and psoas muscle index (median cutoff: 3.044 cm2/m2). Pretreatment psoas muscle index is an independent predictor of poor castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival and overall survival in patients with N1 and/or M1 metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer.

Genomic profiling and clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic prostate cancer: SCRUM-Japan MONSTAR SCREEN project

BackgroundCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing has emerged as a novel tool for cancer precision medicine. This study investigated the genomic profiling and clinical utility of ctDNA in metastatic prostate cancer.MethodsThis is a nation-wide prospective observational study. Patients treated with systemic treatment for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) were included. ctDNA was analyzed using FoundationOne Liquid®CDx at enrollment. In a subset of patients, ctDNA after disease progression and tissue prior to the initiation of treatment were examined using FoundationOne Liquid®CDx and FoundationOne®CDx, respectively.ResultsThe frequency of AR alterations and homologous recombination repair (HRR) defect was higher in mCRPC compared with mCSPC. Tumor mutational burden was correlated between tissue and ctDNA at pre-treatment, as well as ctDNA between at pre-treatment and at post-treatment. Patients with HRR defect were associated with shorter time to castration resistance in androgen deprivation therapy/combined androgen blockade, but not in androgen receptor pathway inhibitor, compared with patients without HRR defect in mCSPC. Time to treatment failure in patients with AR amplification or AR mutation was shorter compared with patients without AR alterations in mCRPC.ConclusionsThis study revealed valuable findings for the clinical care of metastatic prostate cancer. Especially, predictive factors such as HRR defect in mCSPC should be validated in the future.

Emerging racial disparities among Medicare beneficiaries and Veterans with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer.

Previous studies have shown that Black men receive worse prostate cancer care than White men. This has not been explored in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) in the current treatment era. We evaluated treatment intensification (TI) and overall survival (OS) in Medicare (2015-2018) and Veterans Health Administration (VHA; 2015-2019) patients with mCSPC, classifying first-line mCSPC treatment as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) + novel hormonal therapy; ADT + docetaxel; ADT + first-generation nonsteroidal antiandrogen; or ADT alone. We analyzed 2226 Black and 16,071 White Medicare, and 1020 Black and 2364 White VHA patients. TI was significantly lower for Black vs White Medicare patients overall (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-0.81) and without Medicaid (adjusted OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.57-0.87). Medicaid patients had less TI irrespective of race. OS was worse for Black vs White Medicare patients overall (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.20; 95% CI 1.09-1.31) and without Medicaid (adjusted HR 1.13; 95% CI 1.01-1.27). OS was worse in Medicaid vs without Medicaid, with no significant OS difference between races. TI was significantly lower for Black vs White VHA patients (adjusted OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61-0.92), with no significant OS difference between races. Guideline-recommended TI was low for all patients with mCSPC, with less TI in Black patients in both Medicare and the VHA. Black race was associated with worse OS in Medicare but not theVHA. Medicaid patients had less TI and worse OS than those without Medicaid, suggesting poverty and race are associated with care and outcomes.

Expert Perspectives on Controversies in Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Management: Narrative Review and Report of the First US Prostate Cancer Conference Part 1.

Castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC) is a complex and heterogeneous condition encompassing a range of clinical presentations. As new approaches have expanded management options, clinicians are left with myriad questions and controversies regarding the optimal individualized management of CSPC. The US Prostate Cancer Conference (USPCC) multidisciplinary panel was assembled to address the challenges of prostate cancer management. The first annual USPCC meeting included experts in urology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, and nuclear medicine. USPCC co-chairs and session moderators identified key areas of controversy and uncertainty in prostate cancer management and organized the sessions with multidisciplinary presentations and discussion. Throughout the meeting, experts responded to questions prepared by chairs and moderators to identify areas of agreement and controversy. The USPCC panel discussion and question responses for CSPC-related topics are presented. Key advances in CSPC management endorsed by USPCC experts included the development and clinical utilization of gene expression classifiers and artificial intelligence (AI) models for risk stratification and treatment selection in specific patient populations, the use of advanced imaging modalities in patients with clinically localized unfavorable intermediate or high-risk disease and those with biochemical recurrence, recommendations of doublet or triplet therapy for metastatic CSPC (mCSPC), and consideration of prostate and/or metastasis-directed radiation therapy in select patients with mCSPC. CSPC is a diverse disease with many therapeutic options and the potential for adverse outcomes associated with either undertreatment or overtreatment. Future studies are needed to validate and clinically integrate novel technologies, including genomics, AI, and advanced imaging, to optimize outcomes among patients with CSPC.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET Response Associates with Metastasis-Free Survival After Stereotactic Ablative Radiation in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer

PurposeEmerging data suggest metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) improves outcomes in patients with oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC). Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) can detect occult metastatic disease and has been proposed as a biomarker for treatment response. Herein we identify and validate a PSMA-PET biomarker for metastasis-free survival (MFS) following MDT in omCSPC. Methods and materialsWe performed an international multi-institutional retrospective study of patients with omCSPC, defined as ≤3 lesions, treated with metastasis-directed stereotactic ablative radiation therapy who underwent PSMA-PET/CT prior to and after (median 6.2 months, range 2.4-10.9 months) treatment. Pre- and post-MDT PSMA-PET/CT SUVmax was measured for all lesions and PSMA response was defined as percent change in SUVmax of the least responsive lesion. PSMA response was evaluated as both a continuous variable and dichotomized as PSMA responders with a complete/partial response (at least 30% reduction in SUVmax) and PSMA non-responders with stable/progressive disease (less than a 30% reduction in SUVmax). PSMA response was correlated conventional imaging defined metastasis-free survival (MFS) with Kaplan-Meier and cox regression. ResultsA total of 131 patients with 261 treated metastases were included in the analysis, with median follow-up of 29 months (IQR 18.5-41.3). Following SABR, 70.2% of patients were classified as PSMA responders. Multivariable analysis demonstrated PSMA response as a continuous variable was associated with significantly worse MFS (HR=1.003, 95%CI 1.001-1.006; p=0.016). Patients classified as PSMA responders were found to have significantly improved median MFS of 39.9 vs 12 months (p=0.001) compared to PSMA non-responders. Our study is limited as it is a retrospective review of a heterogenous population. ConclusionsFollowing SABR, PSMA-PET response appears to be a radiographic biomarker that correlates with MFS in omCSPC. This approach holds promise for guiding clinical management of omCSPC and should be validated in a prospective setting.

Radiographic Progression Without Corresponding Prostate-specific Antigen Progression in Patients with Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer Receiving Apalutamide: Secondary Analysis of the TITAN Trial

Background and objectiveIn prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the initial sign of treatment resistance is often prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, followed by radiographic progression. However, the association between these two forms of progression remains unclear, especially in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors. We sought to evaluate the association between radiographic progression, PSA progression, and outcomes of apalutamide therapy in mCSPC. MethodsWe analyzed individual participant-level data for patients randomized within the TITAN trial who experienced radiographic progression during follow-up (N = 326). This study investigated radiographic progression without simultaneous or preceding PSA progression, as defined by the Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 (discordant progression), and explored the association of such progression with radiographic progression-free survival. Key findings and limitationsAmong the patients who developed radiographic progression, 115 (35.3%) had been treated with apalutamide plus ADT (the apalutamide group) and 211 (64.7%) with placebo plus ADT (the placebo group). Discordant progression occurred in 52.2% of patients (60 of 115) in the apalutamide group and 27.5% (58 of 211) in the placebo group (p < 0.001). A multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that discordant progression was associated with apalutamide treatment. We found evidence of an association between discordant progression and shorter radiographic progression-free survival. Conclusions and clinical implicationsThis study found that nearly half of the patients with mCSPC treated with apalutamide who experienced radiographic progression developed it without corresponding PSA progression, suggesting that heavy reliance on PSA monitoring may be inadequate for assessing disease activity in this context. Patient summaryIn patients who have metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) and are being treated with apalutamide, radiographic images may show cancer progression even if prostate-specific antigen tests indicate no change. This highlights the importance of regular imaging when using apalutamide to manage mCSPC.

The treatment landscape of nonmetastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer: A contemporary perspective

ObjectivesThe incidence of nonmetastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is not well defined in contemporary practice. The aim of this study is to describe the incidence and patterns of treatment of nmCRPC over the last 6 years at a single high-volume Australian health institution. Subjects and methodsAll men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer at Western Health, Melbourne from January 2016 to December 2021 were included in the study. Those diagnosed with nonmetastatic prostate cancer and treated with medical or surgical castration for biochemical failure post attempted curative therapy were retrospectively reviewed for signs of castration resistance using prostate specific antigen (PSA) and testosterone biochemical markers up until October 2022. ResultsFrom January 2016 to December 2021, 822 patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer, 590 had localized disease, 373 underwent definitive locoregional therapy, and 31 went on to have biochemical recurrence and were commenced on androgen deprivation therapy. Twenty-five patients had undetectable PSA levels and were classified as having nonmetastatic castrate sensitive prostate cancer (nmCSPC), whilst the remaining 6 patients experienced a rising PSA and were thus classified as nmCRPC. The incidence rate of nmCRPC was 228 cases per 100,000 person-years.The median age at the time of prostate biopsy was 74 years (interquartile range [IQR] 64–79) in the nmCRPC group and 62 years (IQR 57–69) in the nmCSPC group. The median prebiopsy PSA (ng/ml) in the nmCRPC and nmCSPC groups were 27.5 (IQR 19.9–50.4), and 16.5 (IQR 9.0–26.0), respectively. The median duration from prostate cancer diagnosis to onset of nmCRPC was 24 months (IQR 17–29) and the median PSA doubling time was 3.4 months (IQR 2.2–5.7). ConclusionsThus, nmCRPC is an uncommon disease. Further population-based studies are required to better understand the incidence of nmCRPC.

Minimally invasive cytoreductive radical prostatectomy, exploring the safety and feasibility of a single-port or multi-port robotic platform

BackgroundConsolidative resection or cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (CRP) may benefit men with non-organ confined prostate cancer. We report the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic CRP using a single-port (SP) or multi-port (MP) platform.MethodsWe reviewed consecutive men with clinical node positive or metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer who underwent IRB-approved CRP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection using the da Vinci SP or MP Surgical Systems (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) from 2015–2022. Perioperative data and Clavien-Dindo 90-day complications were recorded.ResultsTwenty-four men with a median age of 61 (IQR 56—69) years and prostate-specific antigen of 32.1 (IQR 21.9—62.3) ng/mL were included. Clinical N1, M1, or N1 + M1 disease were detected in 8 (33%), 9 (38%), 7 (29%) patients, respectively. There was no difference in positive margins, 41% vs. 29% (P = 0.67), lymph node yield, 21 (IQR 14–28) vs. 20 (IQR 13.5–21) nodes (P = 0.31), or estimated blood loss, 150 mL (IQR 100–200) vs. 50 mL (IQR 50–125) (P = 0.06), between the MP and SP cohorts, respectively. Hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for the SP group, same-day discharge (IQR 0–0), compared to MP, 1-day (IQR 1–1), P < 0.001. One grade III bowel obstruction and lymphocele occurred in the MP cohort. No major complications occurred in the SP cohort.ConclusionRobot-assisted laparoscopic CRP is safe and feasible for select men with advanced castrate-sensitive prostate cancer.

Abstract 1136: Tumor genomic and transcriptomic profiling of patients (pts) with metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) who do versus do not achieve an optimal PSA response to androgen deprivation therapy intensification (ADTi)

Abstract Background: Pts with mCSPC receiving ADTi and achieving PSA nadir ≤0.2 ng/mL (PSA-L) have better overall survival (OS) compared to those with a PSA nadir &amp;gt; 0.2 ng/mL (PSA-H). We investigate differences in genomic and transcriptomic profiling between PSA-L and PSA-H. Methods: In this IRB-approved retrospective study, eligibility criteria included confirmed mCSPC receiving ADTi and having comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) performed by a CLIA-certified lab (Foundation Medicine and Tempus). Transcriptomic profile was evaluated from Tempus cohort. Pts were divided into 2 groups: PSA-L and PSA-H based on achieving a PSA nadir ≤0.2 ng/mL at any time during treatment course. The DEseq2 pipeline was used to analyze differentially expressed genes between the groups. The data included the Log2 fold change, Wald-Test p-values, and Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p values (q values) for each differentially expressed gene. These results were subjected to Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to identify pathways enriched in each cohort. All bioinformatic analysis was undertaken using R studio v4.2. Results: 248 pts were eligible for genomic analysis (PSA-L=166, PSA-H=82). The top 5 most commonly altered genes were TMPRSS2, TP53, PTEN, APC, and SPOP. Genomic analysis did not reveal significant differences between PSA-L and PSA-H. 78 pts were eligible for transcriptomic analysis (PSA-L=55, PSA-H=23). Table shows differences in the expression of pathways between PSA-L and PSA-H. Conclusion: While there were no significant differences in genomic aberrations between PSA-L and PSA-H, gene expression profiling showed significant variations in crucial pathways, particularly the AR pathway, which might explain the better outcomes in PSA-L. After external validation, these findings may help personalize medicine prior to initiation of therapy. Differential gene set expression scores in PSA-L vs. PSA-H Pathway Normalized Enrichment Score (NES)* p-value q-value TNF-α signaling via NFKB 2.5 &amp;lt;0.01 &amp;lt;0.01 Androgen Response 1.7 &amp;lt;0.01 &amp;lt;0.01 Estrogen Response 1.7 &amp;lt;0.01 &amp;lt;0.01 Interferon-α 1.5 &amp;lt;0.01 &amp;lt;0.01 Bile Acid Metabolism -1.5 &amp;lt;0.01 &amp;lt;0.01 Coagulation -1.7 &amp;lt;0.01 &amp;lt;0.01 Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition -1.9 &amp;lt;0.01 &amp;lt;0.01 Citation Format: Vinay Mathew Thomas, Beverly Chigarira, Georges Gebrael, Chadi Chehade, Arshit Narang, Nicolas Sayegh, Nishita Tripathi, Yeonjung Jo, Clara Tandar, Ayana Srivastava, Richard Ji, Emre Dal, Gliceida Galarza Fortuna, Haoran Li, Benjamin L. Maughan, Umang Swami, Neeraj Agarwal. Tumor genomic and transcriptomic profiling of patients (pts) with metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) who do versus do not achieve an optimal PSA response to androgen deprivation therapy intensification (ADTi) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1136.

Abstract 2560: Genomic biomarkers of survival in patients (pts) with metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) intensification (ADTi)

Abstract Background: ADTi with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) with or without docetaxel improves survival outcomes in pts with mCSPC. Even with ADTi, 20% of these pts progress within a year and experience poor overall survival (OS). Identifying baseline genomic biomarkers predicting poor survival outcomes in pts receiving ADTi remains an unmet need. Methods: In this IRB-approved retrospective study, pts with a new diagnosis of mCSPC who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling of primary prostate tissue or metastatic site or cell-free DNA and treated with ADTi (ADT with ARPI or docetaxel) were included. Genomic alterations with an incidence &amp;gt; 5% were included in the analysis. Study endpoints: progression-free survival (PFS) was defined from the start of therapy for mCSPC to progression (per PCWG-2) or death from any cause. OS was defined from the start of therapy for mCSPC to the date of death from any cause or censored at the last follow-up. A multivariable analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model was used, adjusting for age at mCSPC diagnosis, disease volume (high vs. low), Gleason score (≥ 8 vs. &amp;lt; 8), Log2PSA at baseline, and initial timing of metastasis (de novo vs. non de novo). A subgroup analysis by intensification treatment received (ARPI vs. docetaxel) was also performed. Missing baseline characteristics such as volume of disease, Gleason score, and Log2PSA were multiply imputed on 50 chained equations using “mice” package in R. All the analyses were done using R version 4.3.1. Results: A total of 289 pts were included in the study. The baseline characteristics of the cohort will be presented in the meeting. The alterations included in the analysis were TP53 (31.8%), TMPRSS2 (30.4%), PTEN (17%), APC (10.4%), SPOP (9%), RB1 (6.2%), BRCA2 (5.2%), and CDK12 (5.2%). In the multivariable analysis, TP53 (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.29-2.72, p = 0.001), RB1 (HR 2.56, 95% CI 1.45-4.53, p = 0.001), PTEN (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.15-2.72, p = 0.009), and BRCA2 (HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.47-4.89, p = 0.002) were associated with significantly shorter PFS while TP53 (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.1-2.88, p = 0.019), RB1 (HR 4.78, 95% CI 2.53-9.02, p &amp;lt; 0.001), and PTEN (HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.37-4.1, p = 0.003) were associated with significantly worse OS. Results of the subgroup analysis by intensification treatment (ARPI vs. docetaxel) will also be presented in the meeting. Conclusions: In this real-world study, we identified genomic biomarkers that could be associated with shorter PFS and OS in pts with mCSPC treated with ADTi. Upon external validation, these results may aid in developing a clinical-genomic risk stratification model, patient counseling, and treatment selection. Citation Format: Arshit Narang, Georges Gebrael, Chadi Hage Chehade, Nicolas Sayegh, Yeonjung Jo, Beverly Chigarira, Nishita Tripathi, Ayana Srivastava, Clara Tandar, Benjamin L. Maughan, Umang Swami, Neeraj Agarwal. Genomic biomarkers of survival in patients (pts) with metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) intensification (ADTi) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2560.

Abstract 7286: Optimizing prediction of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Multimodal fusion of clinicopathological and genomic features with machine learning

Abstract Background: Transitioning from metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) to its resistant variant poses risks of intensified medication, toxic side effects, and financial burdens for men undergoing treatment. Our study proposes a multimodal approach that integrates clinical, pathological, and genomic features to optimize prediction of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) events. By applying machine learning (MML) techniques to multimodal data, we aim to stratify these patients based on the risk of developing mCRPC, contributing to the development of safer and personalized treatment strategies. Methods: We analyzed a large cohort of patients with mCSPC (n=399) with a minimum of 36 month follow-up, annotated with clinical, pathological, and genomic features, encompassing relevant variables such as disease volume, PSA, metastases timing, variant classification, Grade Group, fraction of genome altered, MSI score, mutation counts, karyotypes, tumor mutational burden, and purity. Using a multimodal machine learning framework, we extracted informative features and employed eight distinct machine learning algorithms: K-Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, and Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine with RBF Kernel, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting, in addition to a Deep Neural Networks architecture for building predictive models in supervised binary classification experiments. The models' performance was evaluated on separate training (80%) and testing sets (20%), and standard evaluation metrics, such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and accuracy, were computed. Correlations were utilized to explore the relationships between features, and permutation analysis was employed to determine the importance of predictors. All raw data included in the analysis are available on cBioPortal database. The study is supported by the NIH-NCI-T32 for Next Generation Pathologists Program at our institution. Results: Of the 399 mCSPC patients, 56% developed castration resistance, 50% had Grade Group 5 disease, and 69% exhibited missense mutations. In a series of 8 experiments, the Support Vector Machine with RBF Kernel ensemble model and SVC exhibited the highest performance with an AUROC score of 0.77, while the remaining models tested in the study demonstrated AUROC scores ranging from 0.62 to 0.75. Notably, the fraction of altered genome emerged as the top-ranked predictor, displaying the highest importance score. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the strong predictive performance of MML models in accurately identifying mCRPC events by leveraging routine clinical, pathological, and genomic data, offering valuable guidance for optimizing patient stratification and tailoring personalized therapeutic interventions. Citation Format: Mohammad K. Alexanderani, Francesca Khani, Matthew Greenblatt, Brian Robinson, Massimo Loda, Luigi Marchionni. Optimizing prediction of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Multimodal fusion of clinicopathological and genomic features with machine learning [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 7286.

Bone-Modifying Agents in Patients With High-Risk Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated With Abiraterone Acetate

The association between the use of bone-modifying agents (BMAs) and the outcomes among patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) treated with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) remains unclear. To investigate the association between BMA use and the outcomes of patients with mCSPC receiving AAP. In this cohort study, a post hoc analysis of individual participant data from the LATITUDE trial was performed. The LATITUDE trial, a phase 3 randomized clinical trial, aimed to assess the efficacy of AAP and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) vs dual-placebo and ADT in patients with high-risk mCSPC (data cutoff, August 15, 2018). Eligible patients had newly diagnosed prostate cancer with metastases and at least 2 of 3 high-risk factors (Gleason score ≥8, presence of ≥3 lesions on bone scan, or presence of measurable visceral metastasis). The trial was conducted at 235 sites in 34 countries. Data for the present study were evaluated from July 18 to September 23, 2023. Use of BMAs was defined as the administration of bisphosphonates and denosumab within 90 days before and after randomization. The primary outcomes were time to skeletal-related events (SREs) and overall survival (OS). An SRE was defined as a clinical or pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, palliative radiation to bone, or surgery involving bone. Differences in these outcomes were examined using the restricted mean survival time from inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves, estimated until the last event was observed (longest time observed, 63.9 months). Treatment × covariate interactions were analyzed using weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models for the total cohort. In the total cohort of 1199 patients (956 [79.7%] younger than 75 years), 597 (49.8%) received AAP and ADT, including 474 (79.4%) younger than 75 years and 384 (64.3%) with more than 10 bone metastases (AAP cohort); 602 (50.2%) were treated with dual placebo and ADT, including 482 (80.1%) younger than 75 years and 377 (62.6%) with more than 10 bone metastases (ADT cohort). In the AAP cohort, 132 patients (22.1%) received BMAs, while in the ADT cohort, 131 (21.8%) did. Zoledronic acid was the most frequently administered BMA in both the AAP (93 [70.5%]) and the ADT (88 [67.2%]) cohorts. During the median follow-up of 51.8 (IQR, 47.2-57.0) months in the AAP cohort, BMA use was associated with a longer time to SRE (difference, 7.8 [95% CI, 4.2-11.3] months) but not with OS (difference, 1.6 [95% CI, -2.5 to 5.8] months). In the ADT cohort, BMA use was associated with both time to SRE (difference, 9.3 [95% CI, 5.2-13.3] months) and OS (difference, 5.5 [95% CI, 3.2-9.8] months). No evidence was found that the outcomes of BMA varied by AAP or ADT (hazard ratio for time to SRE, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.48-2.08]; P = .99 for interaction; hazard ratio for OS, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.88-1.96]; P = .18 for interaction). The findings of this cohort study suggest that use of BMAs was associated with a longer time to SRE in patients with high-risk mCSPC treated with ADT, with or without AAP, suggesting that BMA use might provide benefits to this population.