δ 34S-values of sulphate minerals from Castleguard Cave and the bedrock that encloses the cave suggest that the oxidation of pyrite is a possible source for the majority of gypsum seen in the cave. One gypsum sample provides an exception suggesting that anhydrite may also be a source in some cases. The provenance of a sample of mirabilite is harder to determine since its composition may have been affected by bacterial activity as suggested by δ 34S- and δ 180-values of the sulphate ion. Mechanisms of sulphate precipitation in the cave were examined with reference to δ 180- and δD-values of the sulphate mineral crystallization waters and the cave water. Gypsum appears to have been precipitated at an earlier stage partly by evaporation and partly by expulsion of CO 2 from sulphate-bearing solutions. In contrast, mirabilite may have formed in a highly evaporative environment such as is encountered presently. Valley deepening has breached the cave in post-Wisconsin times allowing air to move through it; subsequent evaporation may have led to the formation of mirabilite.
Read full abstract