359 DOES ROUTINE PRENATAL ULTRASOUND (US) EXAMINATION DETECT FETAL ALCOHOL SYNDROME (FAS)? KS ruder, SS Martier', B Gonik, RJ Sokol, Dept, of and Fetal Alcohol Research Center, Wayne State University. Detroit, ML OBJECTWE: To determine the value of roudne US screening in the antenatal detection of FAS. STUDY DESIGN: A ample ofaU pregnant heavy drinkers, randomly selected lighter drinkers and abstainers (n=2282) were identified and followed prospectively through delivery. Repeated, detailed maternal drug and alcohol histories were obtained antonatally, and neonates had dysmorphologic amsessment for FAS, by examination blinded to fetal alcohol exposure. 32 singleton births with s diagnosis of FAS and prenatal US examinations were each matched with two non-FAS neonates of comparable gu~----tationsi age at the time of US. Fetal biomsl~/and US detected anomalies were compared between the FAS and non-FAS groups using t-tosto end discriminent function analysis. RESULTS: The mean geatational age at the time of scanning (29.3+5.1 wks ve 27.0~7.2 wks) was no different. The identification of anomalies was similar (FAS 9.4% ve non-FAS 5.1%). In this sample, we were unable to identify gestations affected with FAS using US measurement of bi-pariatal diameter, orbito-frontsi diameter, abdominal cimurnferenco and percentile, femur kmgth, estimated fetal weight and percentile, and outer orbital diameter. Specif'¢ dysrnorphic features for FAS were not noted by US in any of the affected fetuses. CONCLUSIONS: While we have previously shown a higher rate of anomalies detected on prenatal US in fetuses heavily-exposed to alcohol, detecting anomalies in FAS cases is more difficult. FAS has specific dysmorphic features that are identifiable in the neonate, but dre subtle and may go unrecognized in the antenatal period with clinical US. FAS is rare and even in these ~,'wersiy affected fetuses only a limited proportion can be expected to have substantial, easily recognizable anomalies. Targeted US using intra-crenial and facial measurements, may improve detection of FAS in utero in an at-risk population. 361 FETAL BIni)IIOIEPIIROSlS~ 0UTCOIE & PRO~TIC INDICATORS. A.H. Adra,XlAqA. Mejides x , ~.S. Oennaoui x¢, S.N. Beycloun ~. D'e~pt. of Ob/Gyn & Pediatr ics , Universi ty of Miami, Miami, FL. OBJECTIVE: To study the outcome of fe te | hydronephrosis & ident i fy prognostic indicators. STUDY OESIGII: A tota l of 40 cases were retrospectively collected. Serial sonogralas were perfomed to assess the progression of hydronephrosis & evatuate amniotic f l u i d votumo (AFV). In cases of bladder out let obstruction (BOg), antenatal intervention consisted of bladder end/or kidney decompression. Postnatal evaluation consisted of renal ultrasound, voiding cystourethrogram and renal f low studies. Twenty nine infants were followed up to § years of age. Resutts: l l lpa|red Kidney b r i e r y Observation Function UPJ Obstruct. 22(55X) 14 8 1/16 BLadder Outlet Obstruction 9(23%) 5 0 515 VUJ Obstruct. 4 1 3 0/3 Double Collect. system 3 2 1 013 VU Reflux 2 0 2 0/2 Totat 40 22(61%) 14(39/.) 6•29 ALL patients had normal AFV except for 7/9 cases of BOB. Nean iestst ionat age at del ivery was 37.8 weeks. Fetal urine electrolytes & osmatarity correlated with kidney function at b i r th in 6/7 cases of 60Bt there 4 neonatal deaths occurred. The degree of feta l hydrenephrosis in UPJ obstruction dfd not correlate with Long term kidney function af ter b i r th . Conclusion: 1) The majori ty of infants born with congenital hydronephrosis do well with term del ivery except for those with bladder out let obstruction, where survivors invariably show various degrees of renal insuf f ic iency. 2) Infants with UPJ obstruction, the most common etiology of fe ta l hydrone~nrosis, usually have e favorable tong term prognosis i rrespect ive of the severi ty of intrauter ine hydronephrosis.3) AFV remains the best prognostic indicator for kidney function in utero.
Read full abstract