Purpose: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common long-term outcome of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, but still only ∼50% of ACL deficient knees develop OA. Concomitant meniscal or chondral damage substantially increases OA risk, however factors affecting OA development in isolated ACL tears are less defined. There is evidence to suggest that the impact at the time of ACL injury may be an important risk factor in addition to altered joint mechanics. The aim of this study was to investigate changes in joint mechanics, pain behaviours and OA pathogenesis in models of isolated ACL injury comparing minimal impact trauma (surgical transection) with compression induced ligament failure (mechanical rupture). Methods: Ten-week-old, male C57BL/6 mice were randomised into 4 groups: 1) uninjured, 2) sham surgery, 3) surgical ACL transection (ACLT), or 4) mechanical ACL rupture (mACLR). Outcomes were measured at 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks post-injury. Ex vivo knee mechanics (range of motion and joint stiffness) were measured using an anterior-posterior (AP) laxity tester (n = 6/group). Pain behaviour was assessed using von Frey filaments (mechanical allodynia) or an incapacitance tester (static weight-bearing) and included pre-injury tests (n = 6/group). OA severity in the medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartments was scored histologically for: proteoglycan loss, cartilage structural damage, osteophyte development, subchondral bone sclerosis and synovitis (n = 7/group). Results: ACL injury significantly altered the mechanics of the knee whilst sham surgery did not differ from uninjured joints. AP range of motion increased equally (3-fold) following ACLT and mACLR (P < 0.02), with no improvement up to 8 weeks post-injury. Anterior joint stiffness increased over time in controls. ACLT stiffness was significantly lower than sham at 1 and 2 weeks post-injury (P < 0.02) with some recovery at 4 weeks, whilst mACLR remained largely unchanged but significantly less than uninjured at 4 and 8 weeks post-injury (P < 0.01). Significant mechanical allodynia was equally evident at all time points following sham surgery, ACLT and mACLR (P < 0.001 vs pre-injury). In contrast, weight-bearing was only reduced in ACL injured limbs (1–8 weeks post-injury, P < 0.01 vs pre-injury both ACLT and mACLR). OA pathology was found in both the medial and lateral compartments, but was substantially worse in the former. Differences between the two ACL injury models were also more evident medially. The development and progression of medial cartilage pathology was slower following ACLT compared to mACLR: proteoglycan loss and cartilage damage were not significantly increased until 8 weeks post-ACLT (P < 0.005) whilst mACLR induced significant changes by week 2 (P < 0.001). Similarly, significant osteophyte formation was not evident until 8 weeks post-ACLT (P < 0.005) but was present 1 week after mACLR (P < 0.005). Subchondral bone sclerosis was elevated following mACLR but was not significantly different from ACLT or controls. Synovitis was greatest following ACLT at 1 week post-injury (P < 0.005) but was no different between ACLT, mACLR and sham surgery from 2–4 weeks. At 8 weeks, sham surgery synovitis had returned to uninjured levels whilst ACLT and mACLR remained slightly elevated (P < 0.005). Conclusions: These results show that loss of ACL integrity, irrespective of the mechanism of injury, causes severely altered joint mechanics and increased pain responses. Despite these functional and symptomatic similarities, pathological progression of disease was vastly different between the two models. ACL transection results in a slowly progressive OA whilst compressive rupture induces rapid onset and progression. These findings indicate that pain and anterior–posterior joint mechanics are not predictive of OA severity but the acute trauma itself can significantly influence the outcome of disease. Defining ways to determine compressive loading experienced at the time of ACL injury, could improve prediction of OA risk and patient management.