Carpal Compression Test Research Articles

Burden of carpal tunnel syndrome and its associated factors among construction industry workers in Gondar town, Ethiopia.

Carpal tunnel syndrome is characterized by symptoms such as pain, numbness, or tingling on the anterior surface of the index, middle, or radial half of the ring finger, which is frequently associated with weakness of hand grip, and nocturnal pain and/or numbness resulting from compression of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel between the carpal bones and the transverse ligament. The construction industry involves many activities aside from the building process, such as landscaping, painting, electrical supply, plastering, paving, and telecommunications. Performing such tasks involves repetition of wrist flexion and extension, forceful grip with the hand, and/or vibrations of the hand and arm. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome and its associated risk factors among construction workers. An institutional-based cross-sectional study design was conducted among six construction sectors in Gondar from April to July 2021. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was prepared from the literature with a Katz hand diagram, and a physical examination and a special test (carpal compression test, Phalen's, and Tinel's test) were carried out for those participants who reported pain during the interview. Binary logistic regression was conducted with SPSS 25 to identify the associated risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome. The strength of the association was detected by the adjusted odds ratio. A total of 333 study participants aged 18-70 years were included in this study. Among the participants, 11.7% (AOR: 95%CI: 8.1-15.3) had carpal tunnel syndrome. Age, cigarette smoking, work experience, and working with finger-pressing tools were risk factors significantly associated with carpal tunnel syndrome among construction workers with a p-value of <0.05. The magnitude of carpal tunnel syndrome was 11.7% among construction workers. Being of older age, having more experience, cigarette smoking, and working with finger-pressing tools were risk factors significantly associated with carpal tunnel syndrome among construction workers. Employers should implement work safety education programs that raise awareness about the risks of cigarette smoking and encourage employers and supervisors to seek early medical intervention and treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome before it becomes a chronic problem.

Prevalence of Cumulative Trauma Disorder of Wrist Joint in Auto Mechanical Workers

Purpose – To study prevalence of cumulative trauma disorder of wrist joint in Auto mechanical workers. Method : In this study 60 subjects were taken. Auto mechanical workers working more than 5 year were included in study to know incidence of CTD or wrist in Auto mechanical workers 4 special test were taken Majority group age was from 30-55 years of age. Result : In conducted study 4 special test were taken of subjects. In sharper’s test was negative among all subjects in carpal compression test 3 (5%) subjects were positive. In phatent’s test 11(18.33%) subjects were positive. In finkstein test 6 (10%) subjects very positive. Amount of CTD in Auto mechanical workers is 23.33%. Conclusion: The mean age of study subject was 36 years. Pains were preeminently &amp; significantly observed among higher age group as compared to vesser age groups. Prevalence of CTD in AMW in present study in 23.33

Prevalence of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome among Third Trimester Pregnant Women – An Institutional Based Study

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a most common type of upper limb compression neuropathies.Carpal tunnel syndrome is common during pregnancy and the symptoms are mostly high in the thirdtrimester. Various physiological and electro diagnostic tests are used to detect carpal tunnel syndromein this stage. Though it is common during pregnancy; there are limited studies done in India to find outthe prevalence. Thus this study was aimed to find the prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome among thirdtrimester of pregnant women.Method: A cross-sectional study including 371 pregnant women who visited OBG Department of YenepoyaMedical College Hospital Mangalore. They were assessed subjectively through Flick sign and Katz HandDiagram and objectively using clinical tests including Tinel’s test, Phalen’s test, Carpal compression test andAbduction strength test to confirm the carpal tunnel syndrome.Results: Among 371 pregnant women, 34 (9%) women were found to be positive of carpal tunnel syndrome.3.6%, 6.9% and 11.3% of carpal tunnel syndrome were found in 7th, 8th and 9th month of their pregnancyrespectively. Tests were found to be higher in 9th month as compared to 7th and 8th month but Tinel’s sign wassignificantly higher in the 9th month.Conclusion: In this study the prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome among third trimester pregnant womenwas found to be 9%.

Correlation of clinical grading, physical tests and nerve conduction study in carpal tunnel syndrome.

Background and aims Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common debilitating condition. As the reliability of CTS-specific physical tests and its clinical grading remain a matter of debate, we determined the correlations between these assessments with nerve conduction study (NCS). Methods In this cross-sectional study, patients with uni or bilateral CTS, which was confirmed in electrodiagnosis, were enrolled. Clinical grading was based on the modified criteria of the Italian CTS Study Group. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Boston Questionnaire (BQ) were used. Physical tests [Phalen's, reverse Phalen's, Tinel's and manual carpal compression test (mCCT)] were performed by a single blinded neurologist. A p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 100 patients (age=47.48±11.44 years; 85% female) with 181 involved hands were studied. The majority of hands (59.7%) were classified as grade 2 of clinical grading. On NCS, hands with mild (64%), moderate (27%) and severe (9%) CTS were identified. Sensory (velocity, latency and amplitude) and motor parameters (latency and amplitude) were significantly correlated with clinical grades (p-value<0.001). The correlation of NPRS (p-value=0.009) and BQ (p-value<0.001) scores with NCS was significant. None of the physical tests were significantly correlated with NCS in terms of result or duration (p-value>0.05). Conclusions We found that physical tests are not a reliable screening method for evaluation of CTS severity. However, the BQ and clinical grading can be more valuable due to their significant correlation with NCS. Implications Physicians might benefit from employing clinical grading and BQ in practice for better assessment of CTS severity.

Value of oxyneurography, based on near infrared spectroscopy, in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome in comparison to provocative clinical diagnostic tests and nerve conduction studies

ObjectiveEvaluation of the diagnostic utility of the oxyneurography (ONG) in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). MethodsONG examination of the median nerve was performed in 260 patients. The results were compared with nerve conduction studies and clinical provocative tests. ResultsONG index greater than or equal to 62% was found in 95.18% of the patients with no or minimal Nerve Conduction Study (NCS) changes (1–2 according to the Padua classification) but only in 1.69% of the patients with advanced NCS changes (Padua 3–6). The sensitivity and specificity of the ONG study i.e. 95.18% and 98.31%, respectively, were compared with standard clinical tests: Tinel sign (61.45% and 14.69%), Phalen test (34.94% and 45.20%), reverse Phalen test (81.93% and 34.46%) and carpal compression test (91.57% and 72.32%). ConclusionsONG index lower than 62% was indicative of CTS. ONG has higher sensitivity and specificity then other clinical tests and it is an accurate and reliable method for the diagnosis of CTS. SignificanceOxyneurography is a non-invasive, fast and safe study which may play role in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Prevalence and Related Characteristics of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Among Orchardists in the Gyeongsangnam-do Region.

ObjectiveTo determine the prevalence and related characteristics of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in orchardists and to investigate the association between electrodiagnostic severity and physical examinations.MethodsBetween July 2013 and September 2014, 377 subjects (174 men and 203 women) visited the Gyeongsang National University Hospital's Center for Farmer's Safety and Health. All the subjects underwent electrodiagnostic tests and physical examination, including Phalen's test, Tinel's sign, and Durkan's carpal compression test (CCT). The subjects were classified into 2 groups, the normal group and the CTS group, according to electrodiagnostic test results. To determine the related characteristics of CTS, potential variables, including age, sex, drinking, smoking, body mass index, waist circumference, and total work time, were compared between the 2 groups. The association between electrodiagnostic severity and physical examinations was analyzed.ResultsCTS was diagnosed in 194 subjects based only on electrodiagnostic test results, corresponding to a prevalence of 51.5%. Among the variables, mean age (p=0.001) and total work time (p=0.007) were significantly correlated with CTS. With respect to the physical examinations, low specificities were observed for Tinel's sign, Phalen's test, and Durkan's CCT (38.4%, 36.1%, and 40.9%, respectively) in the subjects aged ≥65 years. In addition, Phalen's test (p=0.003) and Tinel's sign (p=0.032) in men and Durkan's CCT (p=0.047) in women showed statistically significant differences with increasing CTS severity. The odds ratio was 2.066 for Durkan's CCT in women according to the multivariate logistic regression analysis.ConclusionCTS prevalence among orchardists was high, and Durkan's CCT result was significantly quantitatively correlated with the electrodiagnostic test results. Therefore, Durkan's CCT is another reliable examination method for CTS.

The Diagnostic Assessment of Hand Elevation Test in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to establish the value of hand elevation test as a reproducible provocative test for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).MethodsWe had a prospective study of 45 hands of 38 patients diagnosed with CTS between April 2005 and February 2009. The diagnosis of CTS was based on the American Academy of Neurology clinical diagnostic criteria. Experimental and control group patients underwent Tinel's test, Phalen's test, carpal compression test and hand elevation test as provocative tests for CTS.ResultsWe used chi-square analysis to compare Tinel's test and Phalen's test, carpal compression test with hand elevation test. The sensitivity and specificity of the hand elevation test is 86.7% and 88.9% each. Tinel's test had 82.2% sensitivity and 88.9% specificity. Phalen's test had 84.4% sensitivity and 86.7% specificity. Carpal compression test had 84.4% sensitivity 82.2% specificity. Comparisons of sensitivity and specificity between hand elevation test and Tinel's test, Phalen's test, and carpal compression test had no statistically significant differences. To compare the diagnostic accuracies of four tests, the area under the non-parametric receiver operating character curve was applied.ConclusionThe hand elevation test has higher sensitivity and specificity than Tinel's test, Phalen's test, and carpal compression test. Chi-square statistical analysis confirms the hand elevation test is not ineffective campared with Tinel's test, Phalen's test, and carpal compression test.

Clinical tests for carpal tunnel syndrome in contemporary practice

A study conducted to establish the most accurate combination of questionnaire and physical signs for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Nerve conduction studies confirmed 70 patients with having carpal tunnel syndrome who were enrolled along with 70 age- and sex-matched controls. Patients were assessed using a symptom questionnaire, Phalen's test, Hoffmann-Tinel's sign, hand elevation test, carpal compression test, tourniquet test, pressure aesthesiometry and two-point discrimination. Through multivariate analysis, the best combination of tests was tourniquet, carpal compression and Phalen's tests but the difference between these and hand elevation test alone was negligible. The hand elevation test may be used in isolation and is superior to questionnaires and other physical signs in the clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Assessing the accuracy of a combination of clinical tests for identifying carpal tunnel syndrome

The aim of the study was to investigate whether a combination of selected provocative manoeuvres and sensory testing could improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Prospective studies were undertaken in 43 of 296 consecutive patients who were referred with suspected CTS and had undergone nerve conduction studies (NCS). Responses to Phalen’s test, a modified carpal compression test (MCCT), and sensory testing over the thenar eminence were assessed for each patient. For each test (Phalen’s; MCCT), sensitivity (0.64; 0.14), specificity (0.75; 0.96), positive likelihood ratio (PLR) (2.54; 3.64) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) (0.49; 0.89) were calculated. The inclusion of sensory testing did not improve sensitivity (0.55; 0.13), specificity (0.75; 0.96), PLR (2.22; 3.29) or NLR (0.60; 0.91). These data indicate that assessment of thenar sensation does not improve the diagnostic accuracy of CTS. However, a positive Phalen’s test is more likely to be associated with NCS changes that are consistent with CTS.

The serial use of two provocative tests in the clinical diagnosis of carpal tunel syndrome.

1) To examine the diagnostic value of the newly proposed manual carpal compression test (mCCT). 2) To evaluate the test efficacy of a serial use of mCCT and Phalen's test (PT) in the clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in comparison with standard nerve conduction studies. Prospective, controlled study of 47 patients with 63 symptomatic CTS hands according to clinical as well as electrophysiological criteria. In the control group, 39 hands of 20 healthy volunteers were examined. Clinical neurological examination including mCCT and PT and standard nerve conduction studies were always performed: sensory nerve conduction velocity third and fifth digit to wrist, median distal motor latency. Calculation of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value for the mCCT, PT and mCCT+PT, i.e. at least one of both tests positive after sequential application. Sensitivity 83% for mCCT, 79% for PT and 92% for mCCT+PT. Specificity 92% for all three conditions. Excellent positive predictive value of 95% and good negative predictive value of 88% for mCCT+PT. The serial application of mCCT and PT is very useful in the clinical diagnosis of CTS. This finding facilitates the clinical diagnosis by the primary physician, it helps to improve referral decisions to electrophysiological departments and other ancillary examinations and may reduce costs.

Forearm Injury-Weight Lifting

HISTORY: A 21 year-old university football player presented with a chief complaint of bilateral upper extremity pain and numbness. Symptoms started insidiously three weeks prior to presentation. Symptoms initially came on after approximately twenty minutes of weight lifting, but had progressed to become present within just a few minutes of weight lifting. He described pain, numbness, and tingling sensations from just below the forearm down through the fingers. Symptoms could last as long as four to five hours following heavy weight lifting. There were no other exacerbating activities. He had no medical problems. PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: The patient presented as a healthy-appearing, muscular man in no distress. Range of motion in the cervical spine, shoulder, elbow, wrist and hands were all full and pain free. Muscle bulk and tone in the upper limbs were normal. Forearm muscles were quite well developed. Light touch testing revealed intact sensation in the C3 through T2 dermatomes and in all peripheral nerve distributions. Strength was 5/5 throughout both upper limbs. Carpal compression test, Phalen's, and Tinel's sign over the median and ulnar nerves were negative on both sides. Pronator compression test caused mild, vague paresthesias in the hands on both sides. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS: Peripheral entrapment neuropathy such as carpal tunnel syndrome or pronator syndrome. Chronic exertional compartment syndrome Cervical spine lesion TEST AND RESULTS: Nerve Conduction Studies: Normal Median and Ulnar Nerve Conductions Forearm flexor compartment manometry: A. Pre-exercise pressure: 19 mm Hg B. 1 minute post-exercise pressure: 60 mm Hg C. 3 minute post-exercise pressure: 50 mm Hg FINAL WORKING DIAGNOSIS: Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome of the forearm TREATMENT AND OUTCOMES: Bilateral forearm fasciotomies of both the superficial and deep compartments of the forearm flexor muscles were performed. There was complete resolution of symptoms within one month of the surgery. The patient resumed all weight lifting and football activities within 2 months of the surgery without return of symptoms. He has remained symptom free 6 months after surgery.

The Relationship among Five Common Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Tests and the Severity of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

The purpose of this research was to examine the relationship among clinical carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) tests and the severity of CTS. A total of 66 subjects with electrodiagnostically confirmed CTS were tested on five CTS tests, then classified according to the severity of CTS. An association was found between testing positive on Phalen's test and the severity of CTS (p<0.05). In contrast, no association was found between the severity of CTS and results on Tinel's sign, manual version of the carpal compression test (mCCT), Katz-Stirrat hand diagram, or carpal tunnel outcomes assessment tool. The more severe the CTS, the more likely one is to test positive on Phalen's test. Tinel's sign and the mCCT are not influenced by the severity of CTS. This study suggests that Tinel's sign and mCCT may not be useful in assessing the effectiveness of treatment. The Katz-Stirrat hand diagram and the carpal tunnel outcomes assessment tool are not influenced by the severity of CTS, indicating that numerous factors can influence a patient's response on subjective questionnaires.

Carpal compression test and pressure provocative test in veterans with median‐distribution paresthesias

Carpal compression test and pressure provocative test in veterans with median‐distribution paresthesias

Durkan gauge and carpal compression test: accuracy and diagnostic test properties.

A prospective, criterion-based validity study. To assess the diagnostic properties of the carpal compression test (CCT) when performed with the Durkan carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) gauge, and to determine the measurement validity of the gauge. The CCT has been reported to be highly sensitive (.87-.89) and specific (.93-1.0) in the diagnosis of CTS when it is done with thumb pressure. The accuracy of measurements with the Durkan CTS gauge, however, has not been established and the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the CCT when the gauge is used has not been independently confirmed. The study sample included 33 women and 19 men, aged 18 to 85 years (45.7 +/- 13.5 years). The accuracy of the gauge was determined with a force dynamometer and holding frame. Standard nerve conduction studies (NCS) and the CCT were performed on the symptomatic extremity of all subjects. A compatible history and the NCS results were used to confirm CTS. The Durkan gauge registered pressures of 11.94 psi and 15.25 psi at the 12 and 15 psi gauge marks, respectively. Test sensitivity and specificity were .36 (95% CI = .17-.54) and .57 (95% CI = .39-.74), respectively. Pressure measurements obtained with the Durkan CTS gauge were accurate. The CCT when performed with the Durkan gauge, however, was neither sensitive or specific for the diagnosis of CTS.

Reliability of physical examination of the upper extremity among keyboard operators

Background Physical examination is a traditional outcome measure in epidemiological research. Its value as a reliable measure depends, in part, on the prevalence of positive findings. The purpose of this paper is to determine the empirical reliability of physical examination and anthropometry in a field study of upper extremity disorders among keyboard operators. Methods Two experienced examiners independently performed common provocative tests and procedures in physical examinations of the neck and upper extremity among 160 keyboard operators. Two additional examiners conducted anthropometric surveys among 137 workers. Inter-examiner reliability was assessed with observed agreement, kappa statistics, and intra-class correlations (ICC). Results Observed agreement was between 96% and 100% for neck and upper extremity signs, muscle stretch reflexes, and muscle strength, however, with the exception of provocative tests, reliability statistics were unstable. Among the provocative tests, Phalen and Tinel tests had modest agreement after adjusting for chance (κ range: 0.20–0.43). The carpal compression test had the best reliability (κ=0.60 and κ=0.67, left and right side, respectively). The ICCs for anthropometry ranged from 0.36–0.91. Conclusions Results from the study showed that statistically, except for the carpal compression test, physical examination contributed minimal reliable information. This was attributed mainly to the low prevalence of positive findings, and generally mild nature of upper extremity disorders in this population. The results are the best estimate of what would be found in a field study with experienced examiners. While it may reduce bias, separating physical examination from medical history may contribute to the poor reliability of findings. With a shift toward reliable measures, resources can be allocated to more effective tools, like questionnaires, in epidemiological research of upper extremity disorders among keyboard operators. Am. J. Ind. Med. 37:423–430, 2000. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Reliability of physical examination of the upper extremity among keyboard operators.

Physical examination is a traditional outcome measure in epidemiological research. Its value as a reliable measure depends, in part, on the prevalence of positive findings. The purpose of this paper is to determine the empirical reliability of physical examination and anthropometry in a field study of upper extremity disorders among keyboard operators. Two experienced examiners independently performed common provocative tests and procedures in physical examinations of the neck and upper extremity among 160 keyboard operators. Two additional examiners conducted anthropometric surveys among 137 workers. Inter-examiner reliability was assessed with observed agreement, kappa statistics, and intra-class correlations (ICC). Observed agreement was between 96% and 100% for neck and upper extremity signs, muscle stretch reflexes, and muscle strength, however, with the exception of provocative tests, reliability statistics were unstable. Among the provocative tests, Phalen and Tinel tests had modest agreement after adjusting for chance (kappa range: 0.20-0.43). The carpal compression test had the best reliability (kappa=0.60 and kappa=0.67, left and right side, respectively). The ICCs for anthropometry ranged from 0.36-0.91. Results from the study showed that statistically, except for the carpal compression test, physical examination contributed minimal reliable information. This was attributed mainly to the low prevalence of positive findings, and generally mild nature of upper extremity disorders in this population. The results are the best estimate of what would be found in a field study with experienced examiners. While it may reduce bias, separating physical examination from medical history may contribute to the poor reliability of findings. With a shift toward reliable measures, resources can be allocated to more effective tools, like questionnaires, in epidemiological research of upper extremity disorders among keyboard operators.

A systematic review of the clinical diagnostic tests for carpal tunnel syndrome.

The purpose of this report was to critically review studies of the clinical diagnostic tests for carpal tunnel syndrome. The reports were located through Medline, Current Contents, related readings, and the reference lists of the articles. They all explored the use of clinical diagnostic tests for carpal tunnel syndrome compared with the results of NCS. Criteria for systematically reviewing the studies were developed, tested for reliability, and applied to the studies. Many studies did not have sufficient detail to allow repetition of the protocol by other researchers. The sensitivities and specificities reported for each can be compared with the quality criteria ratings they each received. The literature supports the use of the wrist flexion and carpal compression test and suggests that 2-point discrimination has low sensitivity for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome. Many reports do not include methodology, which makes the results difficult to reproduce and to apply to other populations. (J Hand Surg 2000; 25A:120-127.

A new provocative test for carpal tunnel syndrome

To establish the value of median nerve compression with wrist flexion as a provocative test for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), we performed a prospective study of 64 patients (95 hands) with CTS confirmed by electrodiagnostic studies and 50 normal subjects (96 hands). We recorded results for the common provocative tests (Tinel’s percussion test, Phalen’s wrist flexion test and the carpal compression test) and the new test which combines wrist flexion with median nerve compression. Using a receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) technique, we found that the optimal cut-off time for the wrist-flexion and median-nerve compression test was 20 s, giving a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 99%. These results were significantly better than for Phalen’s wrist flexion test (61% and 83%, respectively) and for the sensitivity of Tinel’s test (74%). The positive predictive values of the wrist flexion and median-nerve compression test, which is more important clinically, were 99%, 95% and 81% at population prevalences of 50%, 20% and 5%, respectively. These were significantly better than those of the three other provocative tests at each prevalence. Electrodiagnostic studies have significant false-positive and false-negative rates in CTS, and therefore provocative tests remain important in its diagnosis. We have shown that wrist flexion combined with the median-nerve compression test at 20 s, is significantly better than the other methods, and may thus be clinically useful.

A new provocative test for carpal tunnel syndrome. Assessment of wrist flexion and nerve compression.

To establish the value of median nerve compression with wrist flexion as a provocative test for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), we performed a prospective study of 64 patients (95 hands) with CTS confirmed by electrodiagnostic studies and 50 normal subjects (96 hands). We recorded results for the common provocative tests (Tinel's percussion test, Phalen's wrist flexion test and the carpal compression test) and the new test which combines wrist flexion with median nerve compression. Using a receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) technique, we found that the optimal cut-off time for the wrist-flexion and median-nerve compression test was 20 s, giving a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 99%. These results were significantly better than for Phalen's wrist flexion test (61% and 83%, respectively) and for the sensitivity of Tinel's test (74%). The positive predictive values of the wrist flexion and median-nerve compression test, which is more important clinically, were 99%, 95% and 81% at population prevalences of 50%, 20% and 5%, respectively. These were significantly better than those of the three other provocative tests at each prevalence. Electrodiagnostic studies have significant false-positive and false-negative rates in CTS, and therefore provocative tests remain important in its diagnosis. We have shown that wrist flexion combined with the median-nerve compression test at 20 s, is significantly better than the other methods, and may thus be clinically useful.

Value of the carpal compression test in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome

In order to determine the efficacy of the carpal compression test (CCT) in the diagnosis of the carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), we conducted a prospective study on 200 consecutive hands diagnosed as having CTS. A control group of 100 healthy volunteers with no symptoms of CTS were also assessed. The results of the CCT in the patients and controls were compared with those obtained with Phalen's and Tinel's tests. CCT achieved a sensitivity of 87%, and a specificity of 95%. It is a simple, fast and very reliable provocative test, and should be routinely used in the diagnosis of CTS. This test is also an appropriate manoeuvre in wrists with limited range of motion or pain that cannot be assessed with Phalen's wrist flexion test.