Carotid Artery Stent Placement Research Articles

Clinical and radiological outcomes of extracranial carotid artery stent placement: A single-center study

Objectives: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy are established treatments for carotid artery stenosis. We evaluated the early and mid- to late-term clinical and radiological outcomes of patients who underwent CAS. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 98 patients (112 arteries), who underwent CAS. Baseline demographics, stent types, embolic protection devices, and procedural complication rates within 30-day and 3-year post-CAS, including transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke, death, and stent restenosis, were analyzed. Results: The 30-day complication rates included TIA (5.1%), ipsilateral stroke (4.1%), and death (4.1%). At three-year follow-up, TIA (8.5%), ipsilateral stroke (2.1%), restenosis (1.1%), and death (6.4%) were observed. Contralateral carotid artery angiography revealed neointimal hyperplasia in two vessels (1.9%) and 70–99% restenosis 1 (1%). Notably, a significant association was observed between neointimal hyperplasia and stent geometry, with a higher incidence observed in open-cell stents compared to closed-cell stents (P = 0.03). Conclusion: Our study demonstrated comparable early-term and lower mid- to late-term complication rates compared to prior studies. A multidisciplinary approach with meticulous technique, appropriate materials, and careful patient selection can optimize CAS outcomes.

Early Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stent Placement in Symptomatic Patients with Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis (P2-5.003)

Early Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stent Placement in Symptomatic Patients with Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis (P2-5.003)

Abstract 48: Early Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stent Placement in Symptomatic Patients With Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis

Background: The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) 2021 guidelines state that in patients in whom revascularization is planned within 1 week of the index stroke, it is reasonable to choose carotid endarterectomy (CEA) over carotid artery stent placement (CAS) to reduce the periprocedural stroke rate (level of evidence 2A, weak evidence, [B-R] moderate quality data). Objective: To compare the 1-month stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and/or death rates among symptomatic patients undergoing either CAS or CEA according to the timing of the procedure in Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST). Methods: We analyzed the effect of CAS and CEA on the rates of 1-month stroke, MI, and/or death after adjusting age, gender, presenting symptom (transient ischemic attack [TIA], retinal ischemia, or minor ischemic stroke), severity of stenosis (50-69% and 70-99%), and timing of procedure (≤7 days and >7 days post qualifying event) using multivariate analysis. Results: The rate of 1-month stroke, MI, and/or death was higher (non-significant) in patients who underwent CAS compared with those who underwent CEA within ≤7 days post-qualifying event (8 of 157 [5.1%] versus 3 of 124 [2.4%], p=0.251). In the multivariate analysis, there was no difference in the odds of 1-month stroke, MI, and/or death in patients who underwent CEA compared with those who underwent CAS (odds ratio [OR] 0.57, 95% CI 0.26-1.20, p=0.15). There was no effect of the timing of the procedure (OR 1.19,95% CI 0.48-3.47, p=0.72). The interaction term between CEA versus CAS and the timing of the procedure was not significant (OR 1.69, 95% 0.21-36.31 CI p=0.66). The only significant factors associated with decreased odds of 1-month stroke, MI, and/or death were the qualifying event of TIA (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.57, p=0.02) and retinal ischemic event (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.01-0.63, p=0.02). Conclusions: In our analysis, we did not identify any increase in odds of a 1-month stroke, MI, and/or death rate with CAS compared with CEA according to the timing of the procedure. Qualifying event characteristics rather than the timing of procedure appeared to be the most determinant, highlighting the need to revisit the recommendations in the AHA/ASA guidelines.

The Aristotle 18 and 24 microwires in neuroIntervention: Early experience at a single centre.

Current neurointerventional procedures are expanding the use of large bore microcatheters, of up to 0.033" inner diameters, to accommodate intrasaccular flow disruptors or neck-bridging devices, including flow diverters. The use of large bore microwires may mitigate the ledge gap between wire and catheter, facilitate navigation and offer support in distal tortuous anatomy. We aim to report our early experience using the novel Aristotle (Scientia Vascular, West Valley City, UT) 18 and 24 microwires in neurovascular interventions. We analysed neurointerventional procedures in which the Aristotle 18 and 24 microwires were used at a single centre. Prospectively collected data, from March 2022 to February 2023, including patient's clinical outcome (successful target vessel, aneurysm catheterisation, peri-procedural complications (thromboembolic, haemorrhagic, vessel dissection or perforation) were analysed. Overall, the use of Aristotle 18 and 24 microwires was recorded in 84 neurointerventional procedures during the study period, including endovascular aneurysm treatment (n = 30), endovascular thrombectomy (n = 46), dural venous sinus manometry/stent placement (n = 7), and extracranial carotid artery stent placement (n = 1). The Aristotle 18 microwire was used in conjunction with 0.021" microcatheters and the Aristotle 24 microwire with the 0.027 or 0.033" microcatheters. In all cases (100%), the target vessel or aneurysm was reached with the microwire, allowing seamless advancement of the selected microcatheters. No procedure related complications were recorded. The use of the Aristotle 18 and 24 microwires in neurointerventional procedures is feasible and safe. The microwires provide reduced ledge gap, improved torquability, support and safety over standard 0.014" microwires.

Risk of new cerebral ischemic events in patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis while awaiting carotid stent placement.

Although there is an emphasis on performing carotid artery stent (CAS) placement within 2weeks after index event of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke in patients with significant extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis, the risks and characteristics of recurrent cerebral ischemic event while waiting for CAS placement are not well defined. We analyzed patients admitted to our institution over a 45-month period with symptomatic extracranial ICA stenosis. We identified any new cerebral ischemic events that occurred between index cerebral or retinal ischemic event and CAS placement and categorized them as TIA and minor or major ischemic strokes. We calculated the risk of new ipsilateral cerebral ischemic events between index cerebral or retinal ischemic event and CAS placement. The mean age of 131 patients analyzed was 67years (range: 47-94 years; 92 were men), and 94 and 37 patients had 70%-99% and 50%-69% severity of stenosis, respectively. The mean and median time intervals between index cerebral or retinal ischemic event and CAS performance were 28 (standard deviation [SD] 30) and 7 (interquartile range 33) days, respectively. A total of 9 of 131 patients (6.9%, 95% confidence interval 2.5%-11.2%) experienced new cerebral ischemic events over 3637 patient days of observation. The risk of new ipsilateral cerebral ischemic events was 2.5 per 1000 patient days of observation. We estimated the risk of new ipsilateral cerebral ischemic events in patients with ICA stenosis ≥50% in severity while waiting for CAS placement to guide appropriate timing of procedure.

Transradial Carotid Artery Stenting Using Walrus Balloon Guide Catheter: Technical Aspects and Clinical Outcome.

Despite an overall surge in transradial access (TRA) for neurointerventional procedures, the feasibility and safety of TRA carotid artery angioplasty and stenting using balloon guide catheters (BGCs) through a short 8-Fr sheath have not been studied. In this study, we present our experience of using Walrus BGC through TRA for carotid artery stent placement. To define the safety and efficacy of using a balloon guide catheter for carotid stenting by a transradial approach. Our prospectively maintained retrospective database was reviewed, and consecutive patients were identified who underwent elective carotid artery stenting through TRA using Walrus BGC between January 2021 and June 2022. Demographics, procedural details including access site complications, the rate of radial to groin conversion, and procedure-related transient ischemic attack or stroke were reviewed. Twenty patients were identified who underwent carotid artery angioplasty and stenting through TRA Walrus BGC use; the mean age was 66 years (range 42-89), and 67% were male. A short 8-Fr sheath was used in all patients without any complications. Two of 20 patients required TRA conversion to transfemoral access, both secondary to severe spasm of the radial artery after initial access inhibiting further advancement of the Walrus BGC. Use of Walrus BGC by TRA through an 8-Fr sheath for carotid artery stenting is safe and feasible with a low rate of conversion to transfemoral access and no access site complications.

Abstract WP142: Risk Of New Ischemic Events In Patients With Symptomatic Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis While Awaiting Carotid Artery Stent Placement

Introduction: Although there is emphasis on performing carotid artery stent placement (CAS) within two weeks after index event of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke in patients with cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis, the risk and characteristics of recurrent cerebral ischemic events while waiting for CAS are not well defined. Method: We analyzed patients admitted to our institution over a 45-month period with symptomatic cervical ICA stenosis. All patients were initiated on daily aspirin and clopidogrel 75mg on the day of admission. We identified any new cerebral ischemic events that occurred between index event and CAS and categorized them as TIA, and minor or major ischemic strokes. We calculated the risk of new ipsilateral cerebral ischemic events between index ischemic event and CAS. Results: The mean age of 150 patients analyzed was 67 years (range: 46-94 years; 106 were men); and 94 and 56 patients had ≥ 70% and 50-69% stenosis, respectively. The mean and median time intervals between index event and CAS performance were 25 and 6 days, respectively. A total of 6 new cerebral ischemic events (5 TIAs and 1 major stroke) were observed over 3,776 patient days of observation. The risk of new ipsilateral cerebral ischemic events between index ischemic event and CAS performance was 1.6 per 1000 patient days of observation. Conclucion: We identified a low risk of new ipsilateral cerebral ischemic events in patients with ≥ 50% ICA stenosis while waiting for CAS presumably due to early initiation of dual antiplatelets.

Usefulness of 3D T1-Turbo Spin Echo Imaging for the Evaluation of Intracranial Stent Placement.

Evaluation of intracranial stent placement by MRI suffers the problems of signal artifacts during time-of-flight MRA (TOF-MRA). Therefore, angiographic examination is required for detailed intravascular assessment of the stent placement site. Recently, 3D T1-turbo spin echo (3D-TSE) has been developed for evaluation of carotid artery stent placement. We investigated the use of the 3D-TSE imaging method for the evaluation of intracranial vascular stent placement. The subjects consisted of nine patients who underwent intracranial vascular stent placement between April 2015 and December 2019. Postoperatively, the lumens of the placed stents were measured by TOF-MRA, DSA, and 3D-TSE imaging. Analysis was performed by type of stent and placement site. The stents used were Neuroform Atlas (3 patients), LVIS (3 patients), LVIS Jr (2 patients), and Integrity (1 patient). TOF-MRA of the stent placement site showed defects in the image or poor visualization in all nine patients, whereas 3D-TSE imaging visualized the lumen at the stent indwelling site in all patients. The blood vessel diameter measured by the DSA and 3D-TSE imaging exhibited positive correlations regardless of the stent type and placement site. 3D-TSE imaging allows visualization of the lumen of the site of an intracranial vascular stent, regardless of the type of stent or the vessel. Thus, this method may be useful for evaluating the vascular lumen of a lesion.

Trainee Effect on Procedural Efficiency is Limited in Vascular Surgery Operations

Surgical residents prepare during their training for independent operating experience. However, there is a fine balance between supervised intraoperative teaching and the need to keep operations short since this is associated with improved patient safety. We aim to understand if the composition of the vascular surgical team-presence of anesthesia and surgical trainees as well as the number of circulating nurses-affects elective operative times at our institution. As a secondary aim, we analyzed how time of day affects overall operative time. We performed a retrospective review of all vascular surgery elective operations occurring between January 1, 2019, and October 15, 2021. Our reference operation between procedures was the construction of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). Reference teams included circulating staff (fewer than two nurses), anesthesia (anesthesiologist with certified registered nurse anesthetist [CRNA]), and surgery (surgeon with nurse practitioner). The primary dependent variable was the time interval in minutes from wheels-in to wheels-out of surgery, which was divided into three subintervals: wheels-in to cut, cut to close, and close to wheels-out. Univariate analysis was performed to examine each surgical procedure's distribution of wheels-in to wheels-out time interval. Linear regression was performed to determine the effect of team composition and time of day on operative durations. We included a total of 853 vascular operations. Regarding overall operative time, different procedures took various amounts of time compared with the reference operation (AVF creation). Amputations and arteriograms were shorter (-30min, P=0.03, and -12min, P=0.05, respectively). Other procedures were longer: endarterectomy (+48min, P<0.01), rib resection (+78min, P<0.01), endovascular aorta repair (+120min, P<0.01), lower extremity bypass (+170min, P<0.01), and open aortic repair (+410min, P<0.01). No significant difference was found in carotid artery stent placement. Overall, there was a significant reduction in the close to wheels-out interval for anesthesiologists with a trainee (mean: -2.4min; 95%; CI: -4.7, -0.12; P=0.04). AVF took significantly more time with a surgical resident: wheels-in to cut time (mean: +4.2min; 95%; CI: 0.92, 7.4; P=0.01) and cut to close time (mean: +13min; 3.2, 23; P<0.01). Arteriogram wheels-in to cut time took longer with a surgeon alone (mean: +5.6; 95%; CI: 0.29, 11; P=0.04). There were no other statistically significant findings with change in composition of the surgical team or changes in start time. General surgery residents generally do not add time to vascular surgery cases but may do so in certain cases, perhaps when they are given more autonomy (i.e. AVF creation). Future studies should look at multiple centers, specific vascular procedures, and level of training to explore whether experience among residents (i.e., intern versus senior resident) and case complexity play a role in procedural length, as this may indirectly affect attending surgeon burnout and patient outcomes.

Protected carotid artery stenting in patients with severe stenosis.

Intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) and ulcers are the major findings of unstable plaques. In addition, initial symptoms are associated with postprocedural complications after carotid artery stenting (CAS). The aim of this study was to determine the safety of CAS using an embolic protection device in symptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis and unstable plaques such as IPH and ulcers.This retrospective study included 140 consecutive patients with severe carotid stenosis. These patients underwent preprocedural carotid vessel wall imaging to evaluate the plaque status. We analyzed the incidence of initial clinical symptoms, such as headache, nausea, and vomiting, after CAS. The primary outcomes analyzed were the incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction, and death within 30 days of CAS.Sixty-seven patients (47.9%) had IPH, and 53 (38.9%) had ulcers on carotid wall imaging/angiography. Sixty-three patients (45.0%) had acute neurological symptoms with positive diffusion-weighted image findings. Intraluminal thrombi on initial angiography and flow arrest during CAS were significantly higher in patients with IPH and symptomatic patients. Symptoms were significantly higher in patients with IPH than in those without (63.5% vs 35.1%, P < .001). There were no significant differences in clinical symptoms after stenting or in primary outcomes, regardless of IPH, ulcer, or initial symptoms.IPH and plaque ulceration are risk factors in symptomatic carotid stenosis. However, IPH and plaque ulceration were not a significant risk factors for cerebral embolism during protected carotid artery stent placement in patients with carotid stenosis. Protected CAS might be feasible and safe despite the presence of unstable plaques.

Antithrombotic Treatment after Carotid Stenting in Patients with Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation.

Antithrombotic therapy following carotid artery stent placement with concomitant atrial fibrillation is not well-established. Our aim was to assess the safety and efficacy of the combination of direct oral anticoagulants and a P2Y12 inhibitor at 30 days after carotid artery stent placement in patients with atrial fibrillation. We designed an observational single-center study including patients who underwent carotid artery stent placement with concomitant atrial fibrillation. We studied 3 groups according to antithrombotic therapy: 1) the direct oral anticoagulants plus clopidogrel (DC) group: receiving direct oral anticoagulants plus a P2Y12 inhibitor; 2) the triple therapy group: anticoagulation and dual antiplatelet therapy; and 3) the dual antiplatelet therapy group: following dual antiplatelet therapy alone. The safety outcome was a major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding event at the first month. The efficacy outcomes were the thromboembolic events (myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, or stent thrombosis). Of 959 patients with carotid artery stent placement, 91 met the inclusion criteria, including 24 patients in the DC group, 42 patients in the triple therapy group, and 25 in the dual antiplatelet therapy group. The mean age was 72.27 (SD, 8.1 ) years, with similar baseline characteristics. The median CHA2DS2-VASc score for each group was 6 (interquartile range  = 5-6), 5 (interquartile range = 4-6), and 5 (interquartile range = 4-6), respectively. The median HAS-BLED score was 4 in the 3 groups (P = .17). The primary safety end point was 23.8% in the triple therapy group compared with 4% in the dual antiplatelet therapy group (P = .032), with no bleeding events in the DC group (P = .007). There was 1 stent thrombosis in DC group and a cardioembolic stroke in the dual antiplatelet therapy group (P = .41). Among patients with carotid artery stent placement with atrial fibrillation, triple therapy confers a high bleeding risk. A regimen of direct oral anticoagulants plus a P2Y12 inhibitor might confer a good safety profile with significantly lower rates of bleeding and optimal efficacy.

Clopidogrel Bolus is Inferior to Sustained Clopidogrel Pretreatment in Patients Undergoing Carotid Artery Stent Placement.

Clopidogrel bolus is an option used before carotid artery stent (CAS) placement when sustained clopidogrel pretreatment is not used. To compare the effect of clopidogrel bolus (450 mg administered ≥4 hours) with sustained clopidogrel pretreatment (48 hours or greater) before CAS among patients recruited in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial. We compared the rates of primary end point (either any stroke, myocardial infarction, or death during the periprocedural period or any ipsilateral stroke within 4 years) between patients who received clopidogrel bolus and those who received sustained clopidogrel pretreatment using Cox proportional hazards analysis after adjusting for age, sex, symptomatic status, and initial severity of stenosis (≥70% vs <70%) over 4 years. The rate of periprocedural stroke (7.3% vs 3.4%, P = .03) and primary end point (11.3% vs 5.9%, P = .02) was significantly higher among patients who received clopidogrel bolus. The risk of primary end point was significantly higher in patients who received clopidogrel bolus (hazards ratio 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.4, P = .02) after adjusting for potential confounders. The overall mean (±standard deviation) primary end point-free survival based on Kaplan-Meier analysis was 7.0 ± 0.2 years for patients who received clopidogrel bolus and 8.9 ± 0.1 years for those who received sustained clopidogrel pretreatment (log-rank test P = .011). Clopidogrel bolus was associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes compared with sustained clopidogrel pretreatment in patients who underwent CAS. Therefore, clopidogrel bolus may not be equivalent to sustained clopidogrel pretreatment.

Safety and Efficacy of Cangrelor in Acute Stroke Treated with Mechanical Thrombectomy: Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke Registry and Meta-analysis.

Rescue therapies are increasingly used in the setting of endovascular therapy for large-vessel occlusion strokes. Among these, cangrelor, a new P2Y12 inhibitor, offers promising pharmacologic properties to join the reperfusion strategies in acute stroke. We assessed the safety and efficacy profiles of cangrelor combined with endovascular therapy in patients with large-vessel-occlusion stroke. We performed a retrospective patient data analysis in the ongoing prospective multicenter observational Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke Registry in France from July 2018 to December 2020 and conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using several data bases. Indications for cangrelor administration were rescue strategy in case of refractory intracranial occlusion with or without intracranial rescue stent placement, and cervical carotid artery stent placement in case of cervical occlusion (tandem occlusion or isolated cervical carotid occlusion). In the clinical registry, 44 patients were included (median initial NIHSS score, 12; prior intravenous thrombolysis, 29.5%). Intracranial stent placement was performed in 54.5% (n = 24/44), and cervical stent placement, in 27.3% (n = 12/44). Adjunctive aspirin and heparin were administered in 75% (n = 33/44) and 40.9% (n = 18/44), respectively. Rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, parenchymal hematoma, and 90-day mortality were 9.5% (n = 4/42), 9.5% (n = 4/42), and 24.4% (n = 10/41). Favorable outcome (90-day mRS, 0-2) was reached in 51.2% (n = 21/41), and successful reperfusion, in 90.9% (n = 40/44). The literature search identified 6 studies involving a total of 171 subjects. In the meta-analysis, including our series data, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 8.6% of patients (95% CI, 5.0%-14.3%) and favorable outcome was reached in 47.6% of patients (95% CI, 27.4%-68.7%). The 90-day mortality rate was 22.6% (95% CI, 13.6%-35.2%). Day 1 artery patency was observed in 89.7% (95% CI, 81.4%-94.6%). Cangrelor offers promising safety and efficacy profiles, especially considering the complex endovascular reperfusion procedures in which it is usually applied. Further large prospective data are required to confirm these findings.

Abstract 37: Clopidogrel Bolus Is Inferior To Sustained Clopidogrel Pre-treatment In Patients Undergoing Carotid Artery Stent Placement

Background: Clopidogrel bolus is an option used prior to carotid artery stent placement (CAS) when sustained clopidogrel pre-treatment is not used. Objective: To compare the effect of clopidogrel bolus (450 mg administered ≥4 hours) with sustained clopidogrel pre-treatment (48 hours or greater) prior to CAS in patients prospectively followed over 10 years in Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST). Methods: The rates of primary endpoint (composite of any stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), or death during the periprocedural period or ipsilateral stroke within 4 years after randomization) were compared between patients who received clopidogrel bolus with those who received sustained clopidogrel pre-treatment after adjusting for age, gender, symptomatic status and initial severity of stenosis (≥70% versus &lt;70%) over 4 years using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Results: The rate of periprocedural stroke (7.3% versus 3.4%, p=0.03) and primary end point (11.3% versus 5.9%, p=0.02) was significantly higher among patients who received clopidogrel bolus. The risk of primary end point was significantly higher in patients who received clopidogrel bolus (hazards ratio [HR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-3.4, p=0.02) after adjusting for potential confounders. The overall mean (± SD) primary end point free survival based on Kaplan-Meier analysis was 7.0±0.2 years for patients who received clopidogrel bolus and 8.9±0.1 years for those who received sustained clopidogrel pre-treatment (log-rank test P=0.011). Conclusion: Clopidogrel bolus was associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes compared with sustained clopidogrel pre-treatment in patients who underwent CAS. Therefore, clopidogrel bolus may not be equivalent to sustained clopidogrel pre-treatment.

Use of non-contrast enhanced T1-weighted three-dimensional fast-spin echo imaging for the evaluation of intracranial vascular stent placement

Evaluation of intracranial stent placement by magnetic resonance imaging suffers the problems of signal artifacts during time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA). Therefore, angiographic examination is required for detailed intravascular assessment of the stent placement site. Recently, three-dimensional T1-turbo spin echo (3D-TSE) has been developed for evaluation of carotid artery stent placement. We investigated the use of the 3D-TSE imaging method for the evaluation of intracranial vascular stent placement.

Risk factors and frequency of postprocedural hemodynamic instability after carotid artery stent placement

The frequency, risk factors and long term consequences of reflexive postprocedural hypotension (PH) following carotid artery stenting (CAS) are not well known. Prospective analysis of 30 patients with 6-month follow-up undergoing CAS with an emboli-protection device was performed. A validated 24-hour ABPM was taken 24 hours before and after CAS. PH was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) &lt;90 mm Hg, or decrease in mean arterial BP (MAP) of ≥20% or systolic BP (SBP) of ≥30 mm Hg of baseline BP reading. Neurological assessments were performed 24 hours after CAS and at 6 month follow-up visit. Median age was 69 years, 70% were male, 86% of patients had symptomatic carotid stenosis. Twenty patients (67%) experienced PH, 43% had transient bradycardia, 30% had both PH and bradycardia. The cumulated postprocedural mean SBP and DBP decreased from baseline 128/67 mm Hg to 108/54 mm Hg (p &lt;0.01), mean day (69/min) and night HR (58/min) decreased to respectively 58/min and 49/min (p &lt;0.01). We found no association of PH with age, ischemic heart disease, bifurcation involvement, balloon size, inflation pressure, longer lesion length. Patients with PH significantly (p &lt;0.05) less often were treated with Ca-antagonist (25% vs 70%), more often had ipsilateral ulcerated plaque (85% vs 50%) and had hemodynamically significant stenosis of contralateral ICA (60% vs 30%). During 6 month follow-up only 1 case of neurological deterioration was noticed. PH was a common phenomenon after CAS, however it did not result in neurological complications. Patients at risk can be possibly identified through clinical and angiographic variables.

Management of Internal Carotid Artery and Intracranial Anterior Circulation Tandem Occlusion with Stenting versus No Stenting: A Multicenter Study

Tandem occlusion (TO) describes not only occlusion of the middle cerebral artery but a contemporaneous occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery. There is a paucity of data over whether mechanical thrombectomy (MT) alone, MT with angioplasty, or MT with carotid artery stent placement is superior. We aim to address a gap in the literature comparing carotid stenting with mechanical thrombectomy (CSMT) and carotid angioplasty with mechanical thrombectomy (CAMT) in patients presenting with acute anterior circulation TOs. This is a multicenter, retrospective study from 2012 to 2020 comparing CSMT and CAMT presenting with acute anterior circulation TOs. Primary outcomes of interest were functional status, perioperative stroke, mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). A total of 92 patients (66 vs. 26 in CSMT and CAMT, respectively) met inclusion criteria for analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in functional outcomes at 90-day follow-up (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-3.5; P= 0.46). In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in 90-day mortality (aOR 0.361; 95% CI 0.016-2.92; P= 0.532) and perioperative stroke rate (aOR 1.76; 95% CI 0.160-15.6; P= 0.613). However, sICH risk was significantly greater in the stent-treated cohort (aOR 3.94; 95% CI 0.529-37.4; P= 0.003). Functional outcomes, mortality, and perioperative stroke rates do not significantly differ in CSMT and CAMT procedures in the acute setting. However, CSMT-treated patients do appear to have an increased risk of sICH, potentially due to the use of additional antiplatelet agents following stent placement.

Carotid Stenting without Embolic Protection Increases Major Adverse Events: Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Published data regarding embolic protection device efficacy is mixed, and its use during carotid artery stent placement remains variable. We, therefore, examined the frequency of embolic protection device use and its association with outcomes after carotid artery stent placement using a national quality improvement data base. Patients undergoing carotid artery stent placement with or without embolic protection devices were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data base. The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (defined as death, stroke, or myocardial infarction/arrhythmia) within 30 days. Propensity scoring was used to create 2 matching cohorts of patients using demographic and baseline variables. Between 2011 and 2018, among 1200 adult patients undergoing carotid artery stent placement, 23.8% did not have embolic protection devices. There was no trend toward increased embolic protection device use with time. Patients without embolic protection device use received preoperative antiplatelets less frequently (90.6% versus 94.6%, P = .02), underwent more emergent carotid artery stent placement (7.2% versus 3.6%, P = .01), and had a higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR = 1.81; 95% CI, 1.11-2.94) and stroke (OR = 3.31; 95% CI, 1.71-6.39). After compensating for baseline imbalances using propensity-matched cohorts (n = 261 for both), carotid artery stent placement without an embolic protection device remained associated with increased major adverse cardiovascular events (9.2% versus 4.2%; OR = 2.30; 95% CI, 1.10-4.80) and stroke (6.5% versus 1.5%; OR = 4.48; 95% CI, 1.49-13.49). Lack of embolic protection device use during carotid artery stent placement is associated with a 4-fold increase in the likelihood of perioperative stroke. Nevertheless, nearly one-quarter of patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program underwent unprotected carotid artery stent placement. Efforts targeting improved embolic protection device use during carotid artery stent placement are warranted.

Intentional Stent Stenosis to Prevent Hyperperfusion Syndrome after Carotid Artery Stenting for Extremely High-Grade Stenosis

Intracranial hemorrhage due to hyperperfusion syndrome is a severe carotid artery stent placement complication of extremely high-grade stenosis, causing hemodynamic insufficiency. To prevent hyperperfusion syndrome, we attempted intentional residual stent stenosis and implemented "gentle" carotid artery stent placement, defined as carotid artery stent placement using a closed-cell stent coupled with slight balloon predilation, without balloon postdilation. Gradual stent expansion was expected. We investigated the incidence of hyperperfusion syndrome and long-term outcomes after gentle carotid artery stent placement.We included patients who underwent carotid artery stent placement for extremely high-grade stenosis from January 2015 to March 2019. We defined extremely high-grade stenosis as carotid stenosis with conventional angiographic "slow flow" and a reduced MCA signal intensity on MRA. A reduced MCA signal intensity was defined as MCA with a relative signal intensity of <0.9 in the ipsilateral compared with the contralateral MCA. We evaluated the stent diameter, CBF on SPECT, hyperperfusion syndrome, and intracranial hemorrhage. We defined hyperperfusion syndrome as a triad of ipsilateral headache, seizure, and hemiparesis.Twenty-eight of the 191 patients met our inclusion criteria. After carotid artery stent placement, their median minimal stent diameter was 2.9 mm, which expanded to 3.9 mm at 4 months. Neither cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome nor intracranial hemorrhage occurred.The gentle carotid artery stent placement strategy for intentional residual stent stenosis may prevent hyperperfusion syndrome in high-risk patients. Stents spontaneously dilated in 4 months.

Usefulness of Hybrid Surgery Combining CEA and CAS for Carotid Artery Stenosis with a Large Amount of Vulnerable Plaque.

For carotid artery stenosis with a large amount of vulnerable plaque in a wide range, we performed a hybrid surgery combining carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS), and report the results of treatment. Surgical treatment for carotid artery stenosis in 216 patients was performed between January 2016 and June 2018. Of these, 15 patients were treated in a hybrid operating room because both CEA and CAS were judged to be risky. We treated these patients with preparation of stenting for remote lesions far from the CEA arterial incision. The perioperative treatment results were retrospectively examined. Of the 15 patients treated in a hybrid operating room, 10 were stented after CEA. All these cases were treated by retrograde stent placement in the proximal common carotid artery (CCA). Treatment was completed in all patients, and no cerebral infarction, myocardial infarction, or death was observed in the perioperative period. There were no cases of additional neurological events during the follow-up period, but asymptomatic restenosis was observed in one patient. Hybrid surgery combining CEA and CAS was considered to be an effective treatment for carotid artery stenosis with a large amount of vulnerable plaque.