Abstract

Published data regarding embolic protection device efficacy is mixed, and its use during carotid artery stent placement remains variable. We, therefore, examined the frequency of embolic protection device use and its association with outcomes after carotid artery stent placement using a national quality improvement data base. Patients undergoing carotid artery stent placement with or without embolic protection devices were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data base. The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (defined as death, stroke, or myocardial infarction/arrhythmia) within 30 days. Propensity scoring was used to create 2 matching cohorts of patients using demographic and baseline variables. Between 2011 and 2018, among 1200 adult patients undergoing carotid artery stent placement, 23.8% did not have embolic protection devices. There was no trend toward increased embolic protection device use with time. Patients without embolic protection device use received preoperative antiplatelets less frequently (90.6% versus 94.6%, P = .02), underwent more emergent carotid artery stent placement (7.2% versus 3.6%, P = .01), and had a higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR = 1.81; 95% CI, 1.11-2.94) and stroke (OR = 3.31; 95% CI, 1.71-6.39). After compensating for baseline imbalances using propensity-matched cohorts (n = 261 for both), carotid artery stent placement without an embolic protection device remained associated with increased major adverse cardiovascular events (9.2% versus 4.2%; OR = 2.30; 95% CI, 1.10-4.80) and stroke (6.5% versus 1.5%; OR = 4.48; 95% CI, 1.49-13.49). Lack of embolic protection device use during carotid artery stent placement is associated with a 4-fold increase in the likelihood of perioperative stroke. Nevertheless, nearly one-quarter of patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program underwent unprotected carotid artery stent placement. Efforts targeting improved embolic protection device use during carotid artery stent placement are warranted.

Highlights

  • BACKGROUND AND PURPOSEPublished data regarding embolic protection device efficacy is mixed, and its use during carotid artery stent placement remains variable

  • Patients without embolic protection device use received preoperative antiplatelets less frequently (90.6% versus 94.6%, P 1⁄4 .02), underwent more emergent carotid artery stent placement (7.2% versus 3.6%, P 1⁄4 .01), and had a higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events and stroke

  • After compensating for baseline imbalances using propensity-matched cohorts (n 1⁄4 261 for both), carotid artery stent placement without an embolic protection device remained associated with increased major adverse cardiovascular events (9.2% versus 4.2%; OR 1⁄4 2.30; 95% CI, 1.10–4.80) and stroke (6.5% versus 1.5%; OR 1⁄4 4.48; 95% CI, 1.49–13.49)

Read more

Summary

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our retrospective observational study did not require institutional review board approval or patient consent because the ACSNSQIP is a publicly available, de-identified data base. We used multiple imputation with fully-conditional specification using all covariates and outcome variables to create and analyze 20 multiple imputed datasets This method is widely considered to improve accuracy and statistical power relative to other missing-data techniques.[17] To address potential confounding nonrandom differences between patients who underwent CAS with EPD versus those who underwent CAS without EPD, we used propensity scoring techniques to create 2 cohorts of patients from the entire study population who were matched on their propensity for undergoing CAS with EPD versus without EPD. Multiple imputation and statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26 (IBM), and statistical significance was defined as P , .05

RESULTS
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call