Career In General Internal Medicine Research Articles

A comparative analysis of graduate preparedness for a career in General Internal Medicine before and after national subspecialty recognition to inform curricular changes: have we met the mark?

A survey of General Internal Medicine (GIM) graduates published in 2006 revealed large training gaps that informed the development of the first national GIM objectives of training in 2010. The first recognized GIM certification examination was written by candidates in 2014. The landscape is again changing with the introduction in 2019 of competency-by-design (CBD) to GIM training. This study aims to examine pre-existing and emerging training gaps with standardization of GIM curricula and identify new training needs to inform CBD curricula. GIM graduates from all 16 Canadian programs from 2014 -2019 were emailed a survey modeled after the original study published in 2006. Graduates were asked about their preparedness and importance ratings for various elements of practice. Many of the previously identified gaps (difference between importance and preparedness ratings) have been resolved in specific clinical areas (obstetrical and perioperative medicine) and skills (exercise stress testing) although some still require ongoing work in areas such as substance use disorders. Importantly, gaps still exist in preparedness for some intrinsic roles (e.g. managerial skills). The development of a national GIM curriculum has helped close some educational gaps but some still exist. Our study provides data needed to meet the evolving needs of our graduates.

Delivering on the Promise: Exploring Training Characteristics and Graduate Career Pursuits of Primary Care Internal Medicine Residency Programs and Tracks.

Specialized primary care internal medicine (PC IM) residency programs and tracks aim to provide dedicated PC training. How programs deliver this is unclear. We explored how PC IM programs and tracks provide ambulatory training. We conducted a cross-sectional survey from 2012 to 2013 of PC IM program and track leaders via a search of national databases and program websites. We reported PC IM curricular content, clinical experiences, and graduate career pursuits, and assessed correlation between career pursuits and curricular content and clinical experiences. Forty-five of 70 (64%) identified PC IM programs and tracks completed the survey. PC IM programs provide a breadth of curricular content and clinical experiences, including a mean 22.8 weeks ambulatory training and a mean 69.4 continuity clinics per year. Of PC IM graduates within 5 years, 55.8% pursue PC or general internal medicine (GIM) careers and 23.1% pursue traditional subspecialty fellowship training. Curricular content and clinical experiences correlate weakly with career choices. PC IM graduates pursuing PC or GIM careers correlated with ambulatory rotation in women's health (correlation coefficient [rho] = 0.36, P = .034) and mental health (rho = 0.38, P = .023) and curricular content in teaching and medical education (rho = 0.35, P = .035). PC IM graduates pursuing subspecialty fellowship negatively correlated with curricular content in leadership and teams (rho = -0.48, P = .003) and ambulatory training time (rho = -0.38, P = .024). PC IM programs and tracks largely deliver on the promise to provide PC training and education and produce graduates engaged in PC and GIM.

What makes internal medicine attractive for the millennial generation? A survey of residents in internal medicine in Switzerland.

A new generation of physicians, millennials (also known as Generation Y), are entering residency programmes in internal medicine, and these young men and women learn and work in ways that are different from those of past generations. The aim of the present study was to investigate aspects contributing to the attractiveness to young residents of a career in general internal medicine (GIM) compared with medical subspecialties (SUB). In a cross-sectional online survey, we included residents working in residency facilities in GIM in German-speaking Switzerland. A total of 1818 junior residents were eligible. We looked for personal preferences, characteristics, and criteria influencing the choice of a career in GIM or SUB. 392 out of 1818 (22%) residents participated in the survey (66% females); they had been in clinical training for 35.5 months on average. 87% of the respondents aspired to a title in GIM, and 29% of these to a SUB title as well. 71% of the women chose GIM and not a SUB vs 58% of the men (p <0.019). GIM residents gave significantly higher ratings to “broad range of expertise,” “flexible work hours” (p = 0.007), “work-life balance”, and “reconciliation of work, family and private life” than residents aiming at a SUB. SUB residents evaluated career-related criteria as significantly more important (p <0.0001). With regard to career motivation, GIM residents and female residents rated extraprofessional concerns significantly higher than SUB residents did (p = 0.019). In contrast, SUB residents showed significantly higher intrinsic motivation than GIM residents (p = 0.025). Only 28.2% of GIM residents had a mentor, compared to 49.6% of SUB residents (p <0.0005). Concerning personal perceptions of the future within the next 5 years, GIM residents attached significantly more importance to part-time work (p = 0.001), whereas SUB residents attached more importance to getting a leading position as a main goal (p = 0.0001). There are considerable differences between GIM and SUB residents regarding career motivation and their views on working conditions and work-life balance. It is essential to understand the factors that motivate or deter the next generation in order to ensure the attractiveness of the profession of GIM. &nbsp.

We Are General Internists

The Canadian Society of Internal Medicine (CSIM) achieved a key milestone in December 2010: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) recognition of general internal medicine (GIM) as a distinct subspecialty. Much more work has been done since then, such as developing objectives of training for a new 2-year GIM training program, and additional challenges remain, for example, upgrading training programs across the country, developing a GIM examination for the new RCPSC Certificate in GIM, and attracting the best and brightest into careers in GIM. But it is clear that GIM in Canada has entered an exciting new era. Regular readers of this journal will appreciate that these successes have been through the tireless efforts of many general internists over many years.

Gender Differences in Salary of Internal Medicine Residency Directors: A National Survey

ObjectivesWhether salary disparities exist between men and women in medical education leadership roles is not known. The study objective was to determine whether salary disparities exist between male and female Internal Medicine residency program directors, and if so, to identify factors associated with the disparities and explore historical trends. MethodsThe annual Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine (APDIM) survey in August 2012 included items to assess the salary and demographic characteristics of program directors, which were merged with publically available program data. To assess historical trends, we used similarly obtained survey data from 2008 to 2011. The study included program directors of 370 APDIM member programs, representing 95.6% of the 387 accredited Internal Medicine training programs in the United States and Puerto Rico. Of the 370 APDIM member programs, 241 (65.1%) completed the survey, of whom 169 (70.1%) were men and 72 (29.9%) were women. Program directors' total annual salary, measured in $25,000 increments, ranged from $75,000 or less to more than $400,000. Historical trends of mode salary by gender from 2008 to 2012 were assessed. ResultsThe mode salary was $200,000 to 225,000 for men and $175,000 to $200,000 for women (P = .0005). After controlling for academic rank, career in general internal medicine, and program director age, the distribution of salary remained different by gender (P = .004). Historical trends show that the difference in mode salary has persisted since 2008. ConclusionsLeaders in academic medical centers, residency and fellowship directors, and all faculty in medical education need to be aware that salary disparities cited decades ago persist in this sample of medical educators. Closing the gender gap will require continued advocacy for measuring and reporting salary gaps, and changing the culture of academic medical centers.

Ambulatory Education Redesign: Time to Get Inspired

Ambulatory Education Redesign: Time to Get Inspired

Resident Satisfaction with Continuity Clinic and Career Choice in General Internal Medicine

The quality of the continuity clinic experience for internal medicine (IM) residents may influence their choice to enter general internal medicine (GIM), yet few data exist to support this hypothesis. To assess the relationship between IM residents' satisfaction with continuity clinic and interest in GIM careers. Cross-sectional survey assessing satisfaction with elements of continuity clinic and residents' likelihood of career choice in GIM. IM residents at three urban medical centers. Bivariate and multivariate associations between satisfaction with 32 elements of outpatient clinic in 6 domains (clinical preceptors, educational environment, ancillary staff, time management, administrative, personal experience) and likelihood of considering a GIM career. Of the 225 (90 %) residents who completed surveys, 48 % planned to enter GIM before beginning their continuity clinic, whereas only 38 % did as a result of continuity clinic. Comparing residents' likelihood to enter GIM as a result of clinic to likelihood to enter a career in GIM before clinic showed that 59 % of residents had no difference in likelihood, 28 % reported a lower likelihood as a result of clinic, and 11 % reported higher likelihood as a result of clinic. Most residents were very satisfied or satisfied with all clinic elements. Significantly more residents (p ≤ 0.002) were likely vs. unlikely to enter GIM if they were very satisfied with faculty mentorship (76 % vs. 53 %), time for appointments (28 % vs. 11 %), number of patients seen (33 % vs. 15 %), personal reward from work (51 % vs. 23 %), relationship with patients (64 % vs. 42 %), and continuity with patients (57 % vs. 33 %). In the multivariate analysis, being likely to enter GIM before clinic (OR 29.0, 95 % CI 24.0-34.8) and being very satisfied with the continuity of relationships with patients (OR 4.08, 95 % CI 2.50-6.64) were the strongest independent predictors of likelihood to enter GIM as a result of clinic. Resident satisfaction with most aspects of continuity clinic was high; yet, continuity clinic had an overall negative influence on residents' attitudes toward GIM careers. Targeting resources toward improving ambulatory patient continuity, workflow efficiency and increasing pre-residency interest in primary care may help build the primary care workforce.

General Medicine vs Subspecialty Career Plans Among Internal Medicine Residents

Current medical training models in the United States are unlikely to produce sufficient numbers of general internists and primary care physicians. Differences in general internal medicine (GIM) career plans between internal medicine residency program types and across resident demographics are not well understood. To evaluate the general medicine career plans of internal medicine residents and how career plans evolve during training. A study of US internal medicine residents using an annual survey linked to the Internal Medicine In-Training Examination taken in October of 2009-2011 to evaluate career plans by training program, sex, and medical school location. Of 67,207 US eligible categorical and primary care internal medicine residents, 57,087 (84.9%) completed and returned the survey. Demographic data provided by the National Board of Medical Examiners were available for 52,035 (77.4%) of these residents, of whom 51,390 (76.5%) responded to all survey items and an additional 645 (1.0%) responded to at least 1 survey item. Data were analyzed from the 16,781 third-year residents (32.2%) in this sample. Self-reported ultimate career plans of internal medicine residents. A GIM career plan was reported by 3605 graduating residents (21.5%). A total of 562 primary care program (39.6%) and 3043 categorical (19.9%) residents reported GIM as their ultimate career plan (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.76; 99% CI, 2.35-3.23; P < .001). Conversely, 10 008 categorical (65.3%) and 745 primary care program (52.5%) residents reported a subspecialty career plan (AOR, 1.90; 99% CI, 1.62-2.23; P < .001). GIM career plans were reported more frequently by women than men (26.7% vs 17.3%, respectively; AOR, 1.69; 99% CI, 1.53-1.87; P < .001). US medical graduates were slightly more likely to report GIM career plans than international medical graduates (22.0% vs 21.1%, respectively; AOR, 1.76; 99% CI, 1.50-2.06; P < .001). Within primary care programs, US medical graduates were much more likely to report GIM career plans than international medical graduates (57.3% vs 27.3%, respectively; AOR, 3.48; 99% CI, 2.58-4.70; P < .001). Compared with their counterparts, maintaining a first-year GIM career plan over the course of their training was more likely among primary care program residents (68.2% vs 52.3%; AOR, 1.81; 99% CI, 1.25-2.64; P < .001), women (62.4% vs 47.2%; AOR, 1.75; 99% CI, 1.34-2.29; P < .001), and US medical graduates (60.9% vs 49.2%; AOR, 1.48; 99% CI, 1.13-1.93; P < .001). Reported GIM career plans were markedly less common than subspecialty career plans among internal medicine residents, including those in primary care training programs, and differed according to resident sex, medical school location, and program type.

Educating Generalists: Factors of Resident Continuity Clinic Associated With Perceived Impact on Choosing a Generalist Career

Fewer residents are choosing general internal medicine (GIM) careers, and their choice 5 be influenced by the continuity clinic experience during residency. We sought to explore the relationship between resident satisfaction with the continuity clinic experience and expressed interest in pursuing a GIM career. We surveyed internal medicine residents by using the Veterans Health Administration Office of Academic Affiliations Learners' Perceptions Survey-a 76-item instrument with established reliability and validity that measures satisfaction with faculty interactions, and learning, working, clinical, and physical environments, and personal experience. We identified 15 reliable subscales within the survey and asked participants whether their experience would prompt them to consider future employment opportunities in GIM. We examined the association between satisfaction measures and future GIM interest with 1-way analyses of variance followed by Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc tests. Of 217 residents, 90 (41%) completed the survey. Residents felt continuity clinic influenced career choice, with 22% more likely to choose a GIM career and 43% less likely. Those more likely to choose a GIM career had higher satisfaction with the learning (P = .001) and clinical (P = .002) environments and personal experience (P < .001). They also had higher satisfaction with learning processes (P = .002), patient diversity (P < .001), coordination of care (P = .009), workflow (P = .001), professional/personal satisfaction (P < .001), and work/life balance (P < .001). The continuity clinic experience 5 influence residents' GIM career choice. Residents who indicate they are more likely to pursue GIM based on that clinical experience have higher levels of satisfaction. Further prospective data are needed to assess if changes in continuity clinic toward these particular factors can enhance career choice.

An Academic–Community Partnership to Improve Care for the Underserved

Despite the need for a robust primary care workforce, the number of students and residents choosing general internal medicine careers continues to decline. In this article, the authors describe their efforts at the University of California, Davis School of Medicine to bolster interest in internal medicine careers and improve the quality of care for medically underserved populations through a tailored third-year residency track developed in partnership with the Sacramento County Department of Health and Human Services. The Transforming Education and Community Health (TEACH) Program improves continuity of care between inpatient and outpatient settings, creates a new multidisciplinary teaching clinic in the Sacramento County health system, and prepares residents to provide coordinated care for vulnerable populations. Since its inception in 2005, 25 residents have graduated from the TEACH Program. Compared with national rates, TEACH graduates are more likely to practice general internal medicine and to practice in medically underserved settings. TEACH residents report high job satisfaction and provide equal or higher-quality diabetes care than that indicated by national benchmarks. The authors provide an overview of the TEACH Program, including curriculum details, preliminary outcomes, barriers to continued and expanded implementation, and thoughts about the future of the program.

General physicians: born or made? The use of a tracking database to answer medical workforce questions

The aim of the study was to use a tracking database to investigate the perceived influence of various factors on career choices of New Zealand medical graduates and to examine specifically whether experiences at medical school may have an effect on a decision to become a general physician. Questionnaires were distributed to medical students in the current University of Auckland programme at entry and exit points. The surveys have been completed by two entry cohorts and an exit one since 2006. The response rates were 70 and 88% in the entry and exit groups, respectively. More than 75% of exiting students reported an interest in pursuing a career in general internal medicine. In 42%, this is a 'strong interest' in general medicine compared with 23% in the entry cohort (P < 0.0001). There is correlation between a positive experience in a clinical rotation and the reported level of interest in that specialty with those indicating a good experience likely to specify career intentions in that area. Having a positive experience in a clinical rotation, positive role models and flexibility in training are the most influential factors affecting career decisions in Auckland medical students. Only 11% of study respondents reported that student loan burden has a significant influence on career decisions. Quality experiences on attachments seem essential for undergraduates to promote interest in general medicine. There is potential for curriculum design and clinical experiences to be formulated to promote the 'making' of these doctors. Tracking databases will assist in answering some of these questions.

Factors Associated With Medical Students' Career Choices Regarding Internal Medicine

Shortfalls in the US physician workforce are anticipated as the population ages and medical students' interest in careers in internal medicine (IM) has declined (particularly general IM, the primary specialty serving older adults). The factors influencing current students' career choices regarding IM are unclear. To describe medical students' career decision making regarding IM and to identify modifiable factors related to this decision making. Web-based cross-sectional survey of 1177 fourth-year medical students (82% response rate) at 11 US medical schools in spring 2007. Demographics, debt, educational experiences, and number who chose or considered IM careers were measured. Factor analysis was performed to assess influences on career chosen. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess independent association of variables with IM career choice. Of 1177 respondents, 274 (23.2%) planned careers in IM, including 24 (2.0%) in general IM. Only 228 (19.4%) responded that their core IM clerkship made a career in general IM seem more attractive, whereas 574 (48.8%) responded that it made a career in subspecialty IM more attractive. Three factors influenced career choice regarding IM: educational experiences in IM, the nature of patient care in IM, and lifestyle. Students were more likely to pursue careers in IM if they were male (odds ratio [OR] 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-2.56), were attending a private school (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.26-2.83), were favorably impressed with their educational experience in IM (OR, 4.57; 95% CI, 3.01-6.93), reported favorable feelings about caring for IM patients (OR, 8.72; 95% CI, 6.03-12.62), or reported a favorable impression of internists' lifestyle (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.39-2.87). Medical students valued the teaching during IM clerkships but expressed serious reservations about IM as a career. Students who reported more favorable impressions of the patients cared for by internists, the IM practice environment, and internists' lifestyle were more likely to pursue a career in IM.

Continuity Clinic Satisfaction and Valuation in Residency Training

Internal Medicine residency training in ambulatory care has been judged inadequate, yet how trainees value continuity clinic and which aspects of clinic affect attitudes are unknown. To determine the value that Internal Medicine residents place on continuity clinic and how clinic precepting, operations, and patient panels affect its valuation. A survey on ambulatory care was developed, including questions on career choice and the value of clinical training experiences. Independent variables were Likert-scale ratings (1 = disagree strongly/no value; 3 = neutral; 5 = agree strongly/high value) on preceptors, patients, operations, and resident characteristics. Odds ratios and stepwise multivariate logistic regression with clustering were used to evaluate associations between clinic valuation and independent variables. Internal medicine residents at 3 residency programs. 218 of 260 residents (83.8%) completed the survey. Resident ratings were highest on diversity of illness seen (4.1), medical record systems used (4.1), and contact with preceptors who were receptive to questions (4.8). Resident ratings were lowest on economic diversity of patients (2.7), interruptions from inpatient wards (3.1), and contact with preceptors who taught history and physical exam skills (3.5). High ratings on all precepting issues and nearly all operational issues were associated with valuing clinic. With multivariate analysis, high ratings of preceptors as role models were most strongly associated with valuing clinic (corrected relative risk 3.44). A planned career in general Internal Medicine was not associated with valuing clinic. Satisfaction with preceptors, particularly as role models, and clinic operations correlate with the value residents place on continuity clinic.

UNDERSTANDING RESIDENT CONCERNS WITH AMBULATORY CARE EXPERIENCES IN TRAINING.

Purpose Internal medicine residents have been increasingly choosing subspecialty careers over those in general internal medicine. Resident evaluations of the ambulatory general internal medicine training have been consistently decreasing. Ambulatory internal medicine has become complicated across all practice settings, academic to private practice. The office microsystem has become a target for meaningful primary care change. We conducted resident focus groups to discuss ambulatory experiences during training. Methods All residents were invited to participate in one of three focus groups over the standard noon conference time. Thirty-nine (43%) residents participated. Three sessions were held, one for each level of training: postgraduate year (PGY) 1, 2, and 3 or higher, with similar numbers participating in each session. Resident comments were elicited on the topics of dislikes with the ambulatory experience, educational benefit of both continuity clinic and ambulatory care block experiences, types of patients cared for in the clinic, learning needs, and the ideal resident clinic. Results The primary themes that emerged from the focus groups included patient scheduling, medical records, clinic organization, system-based care, patient characteristics, resident expectations of attendings and vice versa, and resident education, including didactics, evaluation, and areas in which residents lack confidence due to lack of sufficient exposure. These limited-exposure areas included prevention, office procedures, dermatology, sports medicine/orthopedics, business of medicine and billing, time management, and researching clinical questions in an office setting. Overall, these themes and concerns were consistent across all levels of training. Conclusions Internal medicine residents have traditionally felt that residency culture is inpatient-centric and therefore voiced concerns spanning all areas of their ambulatory education. The resultant themes from our focus groups parallel those concerns plaguing most internal medicine practices, academic to private practice. With this knowledge, ambulatory education can change to meet residents perceived needs, improve confidence with general internal medicine knowledge and skills, and potentially result in higher percentages of residents choosing a career in general internal medicine. We are tailoring the ambulatory experiences in our residency program to include changes based on our residents9 concerns.

Changes in Career Decisions of Internal Medicine Residents during Training

Little is known about the timing and stability of internal medicine resident career decisions during the course of residency training. To assess changes in reported career plans among internal medicine trainees during their training. Observational cohort using data collected as part of the annual Internal Medicine In-Training Examination (IM-ITE) survey. 411 internal medicine residency programs in North America participating in the annual IM-ITE. 2638 internal medicine residents who took the IM-ITE and responded to career plan questions on the test survey in all 3 years of training (2002-2004). Self-reported career plans for individual residents during their postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1), postgraduate year 2 (PGY-2), and postgraduate year 3 (PGY-3) of training. 2281 of 2638 residents (86.5%) identified a specific career plan in internal medicine during PGY-3. Of these 2281 residents, 1417 (62.1%) changed career plans at least once during the study period. Career plans reported by PGY-1 and PGY-2 residents matched subsequent PGY-3 plans for 55.1% and 68.4%, respectively. Six hundred eighty-six (26.0%) PGY-1, 278 (10.5%) PGY-2, and 205 (7.8%) PGY-3 residents remained undecided about their career plans at the time of the IM-ITE. Only 25.0% of graduating residents reported plans for a general internal medicine career. The study cohort represents a convenience sample and is restricted to the subset of residents sitting for the IM-ITE and responding to career plan questions in all 3 years of postgraduate training. Career plans were assessed by self-report, and it is possible that residents who responded in all years of training differed from those who did not. In a subset of internal medicine residents in the class of 2004, career decisions changed late into residency training and enthusiasm for careers in general internal medicine remained low.

Effect of the inpatient general medicine rotation on student pursuit of a generalist career

Entry into general internal medicine (GIM) has declined. The effect of the inpatient general medicine rotation on medical student career choices is uncertain. To assess the effect of student satisfaction with the inpatient general medicine rotation on pursuit of a career in GIM. Multicenter cohort study. Third-year medical students between July 2001 and June 2003. End-of-internal medicine clerkship survey assessed satisfaction with the rotation using a 5-point Likert scale. Pursuit of a career in GIM defined as: (1) response of "Very Likely" or "Certain" to the question "How likely are you to pursue a career in GIM?"; and (2) entry into an internal medicine residency using institutional match data. Four hundred and two of 751 (54%) students responded. Of the student respondents, 307 (75%) matched in the 2 years following their rotations. Twenty-eight percent (87) of those that matched chose an internal medicine residency. Of these, 8% (25/307) were pursuing a career in GIM. Adjusting for site and preclerkship interest, overall satisfaction with the rotation predicted pursuit of a career in GIM (odds ratio [OR] 3.91, P<.001). Although satisfaction with individual items did not predict pursuit of a generalist career, factor analysis revealed 3 components of satisfaction (attending, resident, and teaching). Adjusting for preclerkship interest, 2 factors (attending and teaching) were associated with student pursuit of a career in GIM (P<.01). Increased satisfaction with the inpatient general medicine rotation promotes pursuit of a career in GIM.

Clinicians, educators, and investigators in general internal medicine: bridging the gaps.

Financial and time pressures, disparate promotional pathways, geographic separation, and difficulty acknowledging personal fallibility can contribute to polarization of clinician-educators and investigators in general internal medicine (GIM). As a consequence, clinician-educators and investigators may fail to use their joint expertise, may encounter friction in their relationships, and may present a troubled image to trainees considering careers in GIM. We suggest specific strategies that clinician-educators, investigators, administrative leaders, and medical schools might use to foster collaboration.

Building a research career in general internal medicine: a perspective from young investigators.

To survive academically in a clinician-investigator track, junior research faculty must develop a focused, independent program of investigation that addresses important questions with creative, valid methodologies. Appreciation for the rules of the game, good mentorship, and effective grant-writing skills are invaluable in making the transition from new faculty to established investigator. Although we strongly believe that young researchers should study the issues they passionately care about, we hope that knowledge of these guidelines will make it easier for them to balance practicality with idealism.

Introducing Ambulatory Care During the Medicine Clerkship: Impact on Evaluation and Attitudes

This article assesses student attitudes and the overall educational impact after a major curriculum change that implemented ambulatory care in an internal medicine clerkship. The study was cross-sectional with a historical comparison group and took place in a university teaching program with third-year students from three time periods. The 8-week clerkship was changed from 8 weeks of inpatient ward medicine to 4 weeks each of inpatient and ambulatory care in both primary care and subspecialty clinics. When students’ responses before and after the curriculum change were compared, there was a significant improvement in evaluation of the clerkship experience (P = 0.001). Attitudes improved toward a general internal medicine career (P = 10−5) and there was improvement in evaluation of the inpatient experience (P = 0.01). Attitudes toward careers in subspecialty internal medicine and National Board examination scores were unchanged. The institution of ambulatory care into this internal medicine clerkship resulted in several significantly positive outcomes without a negative impact on the internal medicine knowledge base. This article assesses student attitudes and the overall educational impact after a major curriculum change that implemented ambulatory care in an internal medicine clerkship. The study was cross-sectional with a historical comparison group and took place in a university teaching program with third-year students from three time periods. The 8-week clerkship was changed from 8 weeks of inpatient ward medicine to 4 weeks each of inpatient and ambulatory care in both primary care and subspecialty clinics. When students’ responses before and after the curriculum change were compared, there was a significant improvement in evaluation of the clerkship experience (P = 0.001). Attitudes improved toward a general internal medicine career (P = 10−5) and there was improvement in evaluation of the inpatient experience (P = 0.01). Attitudes toward careers in subspecialty internal medicine and National Board examination scores were unchanged. The institution of ambulatory care into this internal medicine clerkship resulted in several significantly positive outcomes without a negative impact on the internal medicine knowledge base.

Introducing ambulatory care during the medicine clerkship: impact on evaluation and attitudes.

This article assesses student attitudes and the overall educational impact after a major curriculum change that implemented ambulatory care in an internal medicine clerkship. The study was cross-sectional with a historical comparison group and took place in a university teaching program with third-year students from three time periods. The 8-week clerkship was changed from 8 weeks of inpatient ward medicine to 4 weeks each of inpatient and ambulatory care in both primary care and subspecialty clinics. When students' responses before and after the curriculum change were compared, there was a significant improvement in evaluation of the clerkship experience (P = 0.001). Attitudes improved toward a general internal medicine career (P = 10(-5)) and there was improvement in evaluation of the inpatient experience (P = 0.01). Attitudes toward careers in subspecialty internal medicine and National Board examination scores were unchanged. The institution of ambulatory care into this internal medicine clerkship resulted in several significantly positive outcomes without a negative impact on the internal medicine knowledge base.