Care Of Chronic Disease Patients Research Articles

Evaluating the Population-Based Usage and Benefit of Digitally Collected Patient-Reported Outcomes and Experiences in Patients With Chronic Diseases: The PROMchronic Study Protocol.

Chronic diseases are associated with a high disease burden. Under- and overprovision of care as well as quality variation between health care providers persists, while current quality indicators rarely capture the patients' perspective. Capturing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as well as patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) is becoming more and more important to identify gaps in care provision, prioritize services most valuable to patients, and aid patients' self-management. This study aims to measure the potential benefits and effectiveness of using electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) and electronic patient-reported experience measures in a structured and population-based manner to enhance health care for chronic disease patients in Germany. This prospective cohort study aims to evaluate the potential benefits of PROM usage in patients with chronic diseases. We evaluate whether (1) digitally collected PROMs and PREMs can be used for health system performance assessment by generating a representative response of chronically diseased individuals with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, and coronary artery disease across Germany, and (2) based on the PROMs and PREMs, low-value care can be identified. As patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are rarely presented back to patients, (3) this study also examines patients' reactions to their PROM scores in the form of digital PRO feedback. For these purposes, randomly selected patients from a nationwide German insurer are digitally surveyed with generic and disease-specific PROMs and PREMs, as well as additional questions on their health-related behavior, 4 times over 1 year. Individual PRO feedback is presented back to patients longitudinally and compared to a peer group after each survey period. Patient-reported data is linked with health insurance data. Response rates, changes in health and experience outcomes over time, self-reported changes in health behavior, and health care system usage will be analyzed. The PROMchronic study explores the usage of PROMs in patients with chronic diseases. Data collection began in October 2023, after the initial invitation letter. All the 200,000 potential patients have been invited to participate in the study. Data have not yet been analyzed. Publication of the interim results is planned for the autumn of 2024, and the results are planned to be published in 2025. We aim to fill the research gap on the population-based usage of PROMs and PREMs in patients with chronic diseases and add to the current understanding of PROM data-sharing with patients. The study's results can thereby inform whether a health care system-wide approach to collecting PROMs and PREMs can be used to identify low-value care, assess quality variation within and across chronic conditions, and determine whether PRO feedback is helpful and associated with any changes in patients' health behaviors. German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00031656; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00031656. DERR1-10.2196/56487.

The Effectiveness of Telemedicine in the Management of Chronic Diseases (Diabetes, Hypertension, and Coronary Heart Disease) at Primary Care Facilities in Eastern Trinidad During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Trinidad and Tobago's government implemented lockdowns and limited the availability of outpatient clinics to curb virus transmission. Subsequently, telemedicine via telephone calls was utilized to address infection control and continuity of care for chronic disease patients. Methods: An observational study was conducted at three primary care facilities in Eastern Trinidad using convenience sampling to review retrospectively telemedicine patients' medical records from October 2019 to February 2020 (before telemedicine) and from March 2020 to September 2020 (during telemedicine) for comparative analysis. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 28.0 software and Microsoft Excel. Results: A total of 199 patient files were analyzed; 57.3% of these were female; 52.3% were 60 years and older. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test demonstrated no statistically significant differences between random blood sugar (RBS) readings (0.355), weight (0.621), or systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP; 0.239 and 0.232, respectively) before and during the 6-month period of telemedicine consultation. Patients compliant with medication before the use of telemedicine were 14 times more likely to attain target BPs. There was no significant association between compliance with prescribed therapy and BP control (0.335) during the period of telemedicine. Discussion: The findings support the use of telemedicine to manage chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and coronary heart disease, as the standard of care was preserved, and no inferiority of recorded outcomes was demonstrated. Although there was an overall decrease in compliance during the telemedicine period compared with before, comparative analysis exhibited no statistically significant differences in BP or RBS readings.

Comparison of attitudes toward the medical student-led community health education service to support chronic disease self-management among students, faculty and patients

BackgroundShortage of health professionals is one of the most important barriers for community health centers to provide quality primary care for chronic disease patients especially after the outbreak of COVID-19. Under such condition, medical students have been well-accepted as a force multiplier for community-based health service. Community service learning (CSL) based on medical student-led community health education service to support chronic disease self-management might be a valuable interactive learning tool in medical education. This study compared the attitudes toward medical student-led community health education service to support chronic disease self-management among three stakeholder roles in CSL, including medical students, faculty and patients.MethodsThis cross-sectional comparative survey was conducted using a self-developed questionnaire among the convenience samples of undergraduate students and faculty members from the Medical College, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, as well as patient volunteers with chronic diseases recruited from a free on-site clinic offered by a community health center. Attitudes toward medical student-led community health education service to support chronic disease self-management were compared among students, faculty and patients.ResultsA total of 515 valid questionnaires were obtained (342 were collected from medical students, 54 from faculty respondents, and 119 from patients). Overall positive attitudes toward medical student-led community health education service to support chronic disease self-management were positive. Among the three stakeholder roles, faculty and patients were more supportive of the current inadequate level of primary care provision within the community. However, patient respondents showed more negative attitudes towards using resources in higher medical education system to provide support for primary care practice, and participating in the medical student-led community health education service to support chronic disease self-management, and were most skeptical about the medical students’ competency in supporting chronic disease self-management with their professional knowledge and skills. The educational value of CSL for medical undergraduates and the role of faculty instructors were most appreciated by faculty respondents. Additionally, > 62 years old and > 2 kinds of chronic diseases per patient exhibited significant correlations with positive patients’ attitudes.ConclusionsMedical students, faculty and patients had overall positive attitudes towards CSL based on medical student-led community health education service to support chronic disease self-management. However, more should be done to create higher expectations and enthusiasm of patients about CSL.

MedMetaverse: Medical Care of Chronic Disease Patients and Managing Data Using Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, and Wearable Devices State-of-the-Art Methodology

MedMetaverse: Medical Care of Chronic Disease Patients and Managing Data Using Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, and Wearable Devices State-of-the-Art Methodology

Telemonitoring for health education and self-management in South Western Sydney.

Telemonitoring (TM) plays an important role in the self-management of chronic diseases. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of TM in early stages of chronic care for self-management and recognition of signs and symptoms of exacerbation, with a view to completing the TM program in an optimal timeframe to encourage independence and self-management. This study was conducted from 2019 to 2020. Included in the study were patients with chronic conditions at an early stage of their disease residing in the South Western Sydney region. Eligible patients were allocated a TM device for 6months. Their routine tests data were sent in real time to health care professionals. Following assessment by a TM coordinator, suitable patients were off-boarded (deactivation of monitoring device) after 6months. Data on hospitalisation/emergency department presentation and surveys were collected to assess the impact of TM on the level of the patient's understanding of their signs and symptoms of exacerbation, self-care, and quality of life. Out of 44 patients approached, seven were off-boarded at the 6-month timeframe. The follow-up data on the hospitalisation/emergency department presentation during monitoring and 12months post off-boarding showed a reduction in the frequency of hospitalisation/nil admissions. Patients reported an increased understanding of their health condition and confidence in managing their own health with the support of TM. The result demonstrates the feasibility of TM as a tool for health education and self-management in the coordination of care for chronic disease patients; however, the small sample size was a limitation.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Romanian Celiac Disease Patients by E-Survey

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has immeasurably struck healthcare systems worldwide, generating disruptions in the care of chronic disease patients. We herein aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on celiac disease (CD) patients. Materials and Methods: An online questionnaire with 46 cascade questions was designed and distributed through the social media channel of the Romanian CD patient association. Results: Altogether, 113 respondents accessed the questionnaire, of whom 95 adult CD patients with complete responses were included in the analysis. The median age of the surveyed participants was 44 years, with the majority (86.3%) being female. Despite concerns, the availability of gluten-free products was reported as being unchanged compared to before the pandemic by 3 out of 4 respondents. Also, our survey did not reveal significant changes regarding adherence to gluten-free diet during the pandemic, as assessed by Biagi score. However, 25.3% of respondents reported feelings of anxiety and 29.5% of depression, but only 3.2% benefited from psychological or psychiatric support. About one quarter of participants postponed their medical checkups due to fear of getting infected. One fifth of respondents declared having been infected with the novel coronavirus, but only 10% of them were hospitalized. One third of respondents had already gotten the COVID-19 vaccine and reported only minor side effects. Also, over half (57.9%) of survey participants declared they had not received enough information during the pandemic. Conclusions: Among our study respondents, availability and adherence to gluten-free diet was not markedly changed during the pandemic, but they were significantly impacted by the lack of CD-specific information about SARS-CoV2 infection and vaccination.

Leveraging Telemedicine for Chronic Disease Management in Low- and Middle-Income Countries During Covid-19.

In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) expanded access to telemedicine to maintain essential health services. Although there has been attention to the accelerated growth of telemedicine in the United States and other high-income countries, the telemedicine revolution may have an even greater benefit in LMICs, where it could improve health care access for vulnerable and geographically remote patients. In this article, we survey the expansion of telemedicine for chronic disease management in LMICs and describe seven key steps needed to implement telemedicine in LMIC settings. Telemedicine can not only maintain essential medical care for chronic disease patients in LMICs throughout the Covid-19 pandemic, but also strengthen primary health care delivery and reduce socio-economic disparities in health care access over the long-term.

Medication cost sharing in low-income elders with chronic disease co-morbidities: Policy implication of PPACA provisions for dual eligibles and parallel systems at national health services

The implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) is aimed at addressing patient safety, quality and insurance coverage for patients with co-morbidities in the United States. Chronic disease patients with both Medicare and Medicaid coverage, however, are further impacted, especially for prescription drug coverage. Additionally, the healthcare reform act entails specific provisions that only affect coverage benefits for low-income elders with chronic disease eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid insurance (dual eligibles). This paper will review the impacts on dual eligible beneficiaries prescription drug cost sharing, Part D plan optimisation and Medicare Advantage premiums. It will focus on the impacts of reducing the Part D doughnut hole and prescription drug cost sharing on patients having additional chronic disease co-morbidities, with reference to healthcare management theory of insurance. This paper will also analyse impacts that affect beneficiary quality of care and access. Dual eligible care for chronic disease patients will be summarised in the context of health insurance and management/economic theory. The PPACA provisions concerning dual eligibles Part D cost sharing align with the theory of demand for health insurance and health care. For dual eligibles with chronic disease, reduced medication cost sharing will increase medication adherence and reduce inpatient expenditures with reference to insurance theory.

Professional Doctorate in Clinical Exercise Physiology

Professional Doctorate in Clinical Exercise Physiology

The role of pharmacists in the pharmaceutical care of asthma patients in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: the patients’ views

Introduction: Community pharmacists are one of the most frequently accessed health professionals who can be involved in the provision of ongoing asthma management within the primary care setting. The aim of this study was to identify patients’ views regarding current asthma care provided by their pharmacists and their perspectives on future pharmacy-based asthma services.Methods: This is a qualitative approach with an interview guide. Asthma patients were purposively selected. Interviews were conducted from April to June 2017. Patient’s opinions about asthma and its management and their experiences regarding asthma care provided by pharmacists were collected. Data were analyzed using content analysis.Results: Thirty-three interviews were conducted. Asthma literacy was low. There was dis-engagement with the health care system, with only a few participants trusting conventional health care professionals. Alternative medicine systems and practitioners were better trusted and participants had strong preferences for family/peer involvement in their asthma care. Participants also had misunderstandings regarding their asthma disease and medications. Participants had experienced little pharmaceutical care provided by pharmacists but would welcome it in the future.Conclusion: Given the accessibility of community pharmacy venues and readiness of the profession for more involved care of chronic disease patients, it may be recommended that Indonesian community pharmacists should adopt the provision of pharmaceutical care models for asthma. Such pharmaceutical care models need to incorporate patients’ unique sociocultural health beliefs, preferences for alternative medicines and family/social peer involvement as well as stronger collaboration between pharmacists and physicians.

Practice strategies to improve primary care for chronic disease patients under a pay-for-value program

BackgroundImproving primary care for patients with chronic illness is critical to advancing healthcare quality and value. Yet, little is known about what strategies are successful in helping primary care practices deliver high-quality care for this population under value-based payment models. MethodsDouble-blind interviews in 14 primary care practices in the state of Michigan, stratified based on whether they did (n = 7) or did not (n = 7) demonstrate improvement in primary care outcomes for patients with at least one reported chronic disease between 2010 and 2013. All practices participate in a statewide pay-for-performance program run by a large commercial payer. Using an implementation science framework to identify leverage points for effecting organizational change, we sought to identify, describe and compare strategies among improving and non-improving practices across three domains: (1) organizational learning opportunities, (2) approaches to motivating staff, and (3) acquisition and use of resources. ResultsWe identified 10 strategies; 6 were “differentiating” – that is, more prevalent among improving practices. These differentiating strategies included: (1) participation in learning collaboratives, (2) accessing payer tools to monitor quality performance, (3) framing pay-for-performance as a practice transformation opportunity, (4) reinvesting earned incentive money in equitable, practice-centric improvement, (5) employing a care manager, and (6) using available technical support from local hospitals and provider organizations to support performance improvement. Implementation of these strategies varied based on organizational context and relative strengths. ConclusionsPractices that succeeded in improving care for chronic disease patients pursued a mix of strategies that helped meet immediate care delivery needs while also creating new adaptive structures and processes to better respond to changing pressures and demands. These findings help inform payers and primary care practices seeking evidence-based strategies to foster a stronger delivery system for patients with significant healthcare needs.

The primary health care nurse of the future: Preliminary evaluation of the Nurse Navigator role in integrated care

Problem/backgroundNurse navigators in the Gold Coast Integrated Care program are co-located in general practices and a community coordination centre providing enhanced access to care for chronic disease patients through a multidisciplinary, multiservice, multilevel primary health care model, which has yet to be evaluated. AimTo evaluate the context, mechanisms and processes of nurse navigators’ practice after one year. MethodsThe theoretical framework of realist synthesis framed the evaluation examining the relationships between context (the program), mechanisms and processes of enhancing patient access to care. Focus groups were conducted with seven of eight nurse navigators and 33 randomly selected patients. Surveys were completed by 55 general practitioners and 19 practice nurses, analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis of free text. Patient and nurses’ focus group data were thematically analysed. FindingsAll patients reported high satisfaction with the nurse navigators. Themes from the nurse navigator group included enthusiasm and engagement; constraints related to workload, variability and time; desire for a professional ‘voice’, and issues with the technological environment. General practitioners and practice nurses identified the importance of information, communication, coordination, advocacy, liaison and patients’ positive health outcomes, with 73% of GPs and 84% of PNs reporting being satisfied with the NN role. DiscussionThe role is effective in enhancing access to care for chronic disease patients by bridging the gap between primary and secondary care. Their expertise and collaborative liaison with multidisciplinary health professionals has been well accepted by General Practitioners, Practice Nurses, patients and the nurse navigators themselves. Further development of the role over time is expected to show an impact on patient outcomes and value to the health system in the ongoing evaluation. ConclusionThe role and scope of practice needs to be articulated across different contexts, and to advance evidence for practice and education for primary health care.

Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of a Respiratory Coordinated Care Program in Patients with Severe or Very Severe COPD

Multidisciplinary community coordinated care programs are widely adopted to optimise care of chronic disease patients, but there is a need for further evaluation in the setting of COPD. This observational study evaluated 147 patients with severe or very severe COPD who were enrolled in a multidisciplinary community respiratory coordinated care program (RCCP) from 2007 to 2012. Comparison was made of hospitalisation rates and length of stay for 12 months prior to joining the program, and the first 12 months after joining the program. This data was used to inform a cost analysis. Enrolment into RCCP halved the annual hospital admission rate from 1.18 to 0.57 admissions per year (relative risk reduction 51.4%, p < 0.001), and annual total length of stay was reduced from 8.06 to 3.59 days per patient per year (p < 0.001). Hospital admissions were reduced from 5.05 days to 2.00 days (p < 0.001). Accounting for the program’s costs, these changes resulted in a $US 906.94 ($AUD 972.80) cost saving per patient per year. A RCCP program can reduce patient hospitalisation and overall costs in the COPD setting.

Personalized Healthcare System for Chronic Disease Care in Cloud Environment

The rapid increase in the number of patients with chronic diseases is an important public healthcare issue in many countries, which accelerates many studies on a healthcare system that can, whenever and wherever, extract and process patient data. A patient with a chronic disease conducts self-management in an out-of-hospital environment, particularly in an at-home environment, so it is important to provide integrated and personalized healthcare services for effective care. To help provide effective care for chronic disease patients, we propose a service flow and a new cloud-based personalized healthcare system architecture supporting both at-home and at-hospital environments. The system considers the different characteristics of at-hospital and at-home environments, and it provides various chronic disease care services. A prototype implementation and a predicted cost model are provided to show the effectiveness of the system. The proposed personalized healthcare system can support cost-effective disease care in an at-hospital environment and personalized self-management of chronic disease in an at-home environment.

Do primary care physicians coordinate ambulatory care for chronic disease patients in Canada?

BackgroundAdults with chronic disease are the most frequent users of the primary healthcare system. In Manitoba, patients are allowed to seek ambulatory (outpatient) care from the provider of their choosing (primary care physician or specialist), with referrals to specialists preferred but not always required. Some patients receive their routine care from specialists. We conducted this study to determine the patterns by which adults with chronic disease access ambulatory care as a prelude to exploring the impact these patterns may have on the quality of care received.MethodsPhysician claims for all visits between 2007/8-2009/10 were extracted from the Data Repository at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy. Patients included in the analysis made at least four ambulatory visits to a primary care physician or specialist within the study period, and met the definition criteria for at least one of six chronic diseases: diabetes mellitus; congestive heart failure; mood disorders; ischemic heart disease; total respiratory morbidity; and/or hypertension. Patients were “assigned” to the physician they visited most regularly. Physician visit patterns were assessed by dividing visits into nine visit types based on the type of physician patients visited (assigned primary care physician, other primary care physician, or specialist) and whether or not they received a referral.Results347,606 patients with 7,662,411 physician visits were included in the analysis. Most visits were to the patients’ assigned primary care physician. About 50% of the visits to specialists were by referral from the assigned primary care physician. However, 26-29% of all visits to a primary care physician were not to the assigned primary care physician, and non-assigned physicians were more likely to refer patients to specialists than assigned primary care physicians.ConclusionThe findings suggest that the current primary care system in Manitoba may not adequately support coordination of ambulatory care. Ambulatory visits to a primary care provider who is not the patient’s regular provider may represent a lost opportunity for coordination and continuity of care, and may affect the quality of care patients receive. Primary care renewal initiatives in this province should address this challenge to service provision.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2296-15-148) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Patterns of delivery of dietetic care in private practice for patients referred under Medicare Chronic Disease Management: results of a national survey

A national survey was used to examine patterns of delivery of dietetic care for patients referred to private practitioners under Medicare Chronic Disease Management (CDM). This asked dietitians about referrals from general practitioners, patient management, fees charged and patient billing. There were 356 (47%) Australian private practice dietitians who responded to the questionnaire; 330 (94%) were Medicare providers. They described a counselling-type service and inability to complete initial patient education within funded consultation time. Many provided a longer consultation than was reported as being funded by Medicare. Fees for initial appointments were generally higher than the scheduled Medical Benefit Scheme fee of AU$56.25 (median $80), requiring patients to pay a fee gap. For review appointments, two of every five dietitians bulk-billed or charged an identical fee ($47.85). Providers communicated by written reports (as required under Medicare policy). There was little evidence of team-based chronic care management. The dietetics Medicare CDM process should mirror other counselling-type Medicare services which provide for both longer and more frequent consultations and higher payment. System integration between dietitians and general practitioners is required to achieve true collaboration and team care of chronic disease patients.

Strategies to Improve Chronic Disease Management in Seven Metro Boston Community Health Centers

The Community, Health Center, and Academic Medicine Partnership Project (CHAMPP) is a partnership between medical researchers, community health centers (CHCs), and a community advisory committee focused on reducing cardiovascular morbidity related to hypertension and diabetes for non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations in Boston, Massachusetts. We conducted site visits at seven participating CHCs, located in Boston. The visits were to solicit health center staff opinions about site-specific barriers and enabling factors for optimum preventative cardiovascular care for racial/ethnic minority patients receiving hypertension and diabetes care at their centers. Site visits included a tour of each health center and a series of directed interviews with center personnel. Site visit notes were reviewed to identify themes that emerged during the course of each site visit. A summary matrix was developed for each health center, which included information regarding the most salient and persistent themes of the visit. Site visits uncovered several patient-, provider-, CHC-, and community-based factors that either facilitate or hinder optimal care of chronic disease patients. Commonly referenced barriers included the need for improved patient adherence to provider recommendations; insufficient time for providers to address complex health issues presented by patients and the need for a broader range of healthier food options in surrounding communities. Interactive patient groups and community health workers (CHWs) have been well received when implemented. Recommendations included adopting case management as a part of usual care for chronic disease patients; additionally, widespread implementation of CHWs may to provide a platform for more comprehensive care for patients.

Evaluating the Validity and Reliability of a Modified Survey to Assess Patient Satisfaction With Mail-Order and Community Pharmacy Settings

The level of patient-pharmacist interactions and services provided varies across different distribution methods and could affect patient satisfaction with services. Determining patient satisfaction with these medication distribution methods is important for improving care of chronic disease patients. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of a modified survey to assess patient satisfaction with mail-order and community pharmacy settings. Exploratory cross-sectional design using a convenience sample of HIV-infected patients at a university clinic was used. Satisfaction scale was modified from previously validated instrument resulting in 21 items on the final survey. Data collection occurred for 7 months, and 178 surveys were completed. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted using principal components and varimax rotation. Reliability and item analyses were conducted. Factor analysis resulted in a 2-factor solution, namely “satisfaction with the efficient functioning of the pharmacy” and “satisfaction with the managing therapy role of the pharmacist,” respectively. Cronbach’s alpha for factors 1 and 2 with mail-order were .951 and .795, for independent were .977 and .965, and for chain were .841 and .823. The study provides a valuable tool to assess patient satisfaction with pharmacy services provided through different distribution methods.

Insuring Continuity of Care for Chronic Disease Patients After a Disaster: Key Preparedness Elements

Care for patients with chronic diseases is a challenge after a disaster. This is particularly true for individuals from health disparate populations as they are less likely to evacuate, have fewer financial resources and often depend on resource-strapped institutions for their care. The specific aim of the study presented here was to elicit challenges and solutions in the provision of health care to those with chronic diseases after Hurricane Katrina in coastal Alabama and Mississippi. Focusing on agencies providing care to health disparate populations, a qualitative methodology was employed using in-depth interviews with health and social service providers. Participants identified key elements essential to disaster preparedness. Predisaster issues were patient education and preparedness, evacuation, special needs shelters, and health care provider preparedness. Postdisaster issues were communication, volunteer coordination, and donation management. Lessons learned from those on the ground administering health care during disasters should inform future disaster preparations. Furthermore, the methodological approach used in this study engendered collaboration between health care institutions and may enhance future interagency disaster preparedness.

Health care reform now!: a prescription for change

Acknowledgments. Introduction. The Author. 1. A Few Hard but Useful Truths. 2. Data: The Missing Link for Health Care Reform. 3. What Do We Do Until the E mr Arrives? 4. Basic Steps to Improve Care for Chronic Disease Patients. 5. Eight Developments That Finally Make Health Care Reform Possible. 6. Making the Market Work for Health Care. 7. A New Idea: The Infrastructure Vendor. 8. Who Should We Hire to Reform Our Health Care Infrastructure? 9. Next Steps and Expectations. 10. Cost Shift Realities. 11. Universal Coverage Now! 12. So What Should We Do Now? Notes.