Care Nurse Practitioners Research Articles

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Emergency Department Use Among Older Adults With Asthma and Primary Care Nurse Practitioner Work Environments.

Older adults from specific racial and ethnic minoritized groups experience disproportionately higher asthma prevalence, morbidity, and mortality. They also often use emergency departments (EDs) to manage their asthma. High-quality primary care can improve asthma control and prevent ED use. Nurse practitioners (NPs) provide an increasing proportion of primary care to minoritized patients, yet often, they work in poor work environments that strain NP care. We examined whether racial and ethnic health disparities in ED visits among older adults with asthma are moderated by the NP work environment in primary care practices. In 2018-2019, we used a cross-sectional design to collect survey data on NP work environments from 1,244 NPs in six geographically diverse states (i.e., Arizona, California, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington). We merged the survey data with 2018 Medicare claims data from 46,658 patients with asthma to assess the associations of all-cause and ambulatory care-sensitive conditions, ED visits with NPs' work environment, and race and ethnicity using logistic regression. More than one third of patients with asthma visited the ED in 1 year, and a quarter of them had an ambulatory care sensitive condition ED visit. Black and Hispanic patients were more likely than White patients to have all-cause and ambulatory care sensitive condition ED visits. NP work environment moderated the association of race with all-cause and ambulatory care sensitive condition ED visits among patients with asthma. Greater standardized NP work environment scores were associated with lower odds of all-cause and ambulatory care sensitive condition ED visits between Black and White patients. Disparities in ED visits between Black and White patients with asthma decrease when these patients receive care in care clinics with more favorable NP work environments. Preventing unnecessary ED visits among older adults with asthma is a likely benefit of favorable NP work environments. As the NP workforce grows, creating favorable work environments for NPs in primary care is vital for narrowing the health disparity gap.

Optimizing Response Rates to Examine Health IT Maturity and Nurse Practitioner Care Environments in US Nursing Homes: Mixed Mode Survey Recruitment Protocol.

Survey-driven research is a reliable method for large-scale data collection. Investigators incorporating mixed-mode survey designs report benefits for survey research including greater engagement, improved survey access, and higher response rate. Mix-mode survey designs combine 2 or more modes for data collection including web, phone, face-to-face, and mail. Types of mixed-mode survey designs include simultaneous (ie, concurrent), sequential, delayed concurrent, and adaptive. This paper describes a research protocol using mixed-mode survey designs to explore health IT (HIT) maturity and care environments reported by administrators and nurse practitioners (NPs), respectively, in US nursing homes (NHs). The aim of this study is to describe a research protocol using mixed-mode survey designs in research using 2 survey tools to explore HIT maturity and NP care environments in US NHs. We are conducting a national survey of 1400 NH administrators and NPs. Two data sets (ie, Care Compare and IQVIA) were used to identify eligible facilities at random. The protocol incorporates 2 surveys to explore how HIT maturity (survey 1 collected by administrators) impacts care environments where NPs work (survey 2 collected by NPs). Higher HIT maturity collected by administrators indicates greater IT capabilities, use, and integration in resident care, clinical support, and administrative activities. The NP care environment survey measures relationships, independent practice, resource availability, and visibility. The research team conducted 3 iterative focus groups, including 14 clinicians (NP and NH experts) and recruiters from 2 national survey teams experienced with these populations to achieve consensus on which mixed-mode designs to use. During focus groups we identified the pros and cons of using mixed-mode designs in these settings. We determined that 2 mixed-mode designs with regular follow-up calls (Delayed Concurrent Mode and Sequential Mode) is effective for recruiting NH administrators while a concurrent mixed-mode design is best to recruit NPs. Participant recruitment for the project began in June 2023. As of April 22, 2024, a total of 98 HIT maturity surveys and 81 NP surveys have been returned. Recruitment of NH administrators and NPs is anticipated through July 2025. About 71% of the HIT maturity surveys have been submitted using the electronic link and 23% were submitted after a QR code was sent to the administrator. Approximately 95% of the NP surveys were returned with electronic survey links. Pros of mixed-mode designs for NH research identified by the team were that delayed concurrent, concurrent, and sequential mixed-mode methods of delivering surveys to potential participants save on recruitment time compared to single mode delivery methods. One disadvantage of single-mode strategies is decreased versatility and adaptability to different organizational capabilities (eg, access to email and firewalls), which could reduce response rates. DERR1-10.2196/56170.

Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant-led Cardiovascular Surgery Postoperative Intensive Care Unit Staffing Model.

To determine whether a nurse practitioner and physician assistant (NP/PA)-led rapid staffing. Model in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit (ICU) can optimize resource utilization without compromising safety or increasing hospital length of stay (LoS). Retrospective observational cohort study comparing before-and-after implementation of an NP/PA-led rapid recovery pathway. A large tertiary referral academic cardiac surgery ICU. There were 116 patients in the prerapid recovery cohort and 153 in the postimplementation rapid recovery phase. Low-risk cardiac surgery patients were selected for postoperative care by an NP/PA-led ICU staffing model. Mean hospital LoS in the prerapid recovery cohort was 5.7 days compared to 5.2 days in the rapid recovery pathway cohort (P = .02). Thirty-day hospital readmission in the prerapid recovery pathway cohort was 7.8% compared with 2.0% in the rapid recovery cohort (P = .04). The ICU readmission rate for prerapid recovery cohort was 4.3%, while the rapid recovery percentage was 2.0% (P = .30). Overall, implementation of an NP/PA-led postcardiac surgical ICU team (rapid recovery pathway) was associated with similar ICU LoS, hospital LoS, ICU readmission rates, 30-day readmission rates, and no significant signal of increased adverse events or safety concerns.

A global perspective of advanced practice nursing research: A review of systematic reviews.

The World Health Organization (WHO) called for the expansion of all nursing roles, including advanced practice nurses (APNs), nurse practitioners (NPs) and clinical nurse specialists (CNSs). A clearer understanding of the impact of these roles will inform global priorities for advanced practice nursing education, research, and policy. To identify gaps in advanced practice nursing research globally. A review of systematic reviews was conducted. We searched CINAHL, Embase, Global Health, Healthstar, PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, DARE, Joanna Briggs Institute EBP, and Web of Science from January 2011 onwards, with no restrictions on jurisdiction or language. Grey literature and hand searches of reference lists were undertaken. Review quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP). Study selection, data extraction and CASP assessments were done independently by two reviewers. We extracted study characteristics, country and outcome data. Data were summarized using narrative synthesis. We screened 5840 articles and retained 117 systematic reviews, representing 38 countries. Most CASP criteria were met. However, study selection by two reviewers was done inconsistently and language and geographical restrictions were applied. We found highly consistent evidence that APN, NP and CNS care was equal or superior to the comparator (e.g., physicians) for 29 indicator categories across a wide range of clinical settings, patient populations and acuity levels. Mixed findings were noted for quality of life, consultations, costs, emergency room visits, and health care service delivery where some studies favoured the control groups. No indicator consistently favoured the control group. There is emerging research related to Artificial Intelligence (AI). There is a large body of advanced practice nursing research globally, but several WHO regions are underrepresented. Identified research gaps include AI, interprofessional team functioning, workload, and patients and families as partners in healthcare. CRD42021278532.

Nephrology nurse practitioner model of care for chronic kidney disease: Lessons learned and informing future healthcare delivery

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects more than 10% of the Australian adult population. It is a progressive disease that involves multiple physiological systems and is associated with several comorbid conditions, making it particularly burdensome on patients and the healthcare system. Alternative models of healthcare delivery are required to slow the progression to kidney failure. Aim: To describe the characteristics, patient profiles, and health outcomes of patients with CKD attending a nephrology nurse practitioner-led clinic. Design: Longitudinal health-service exploratory design. Methods: Following ethics approval, data were extracted from a chronic kidney disease registry for all consenting patients who attended a nephrology nurse practitioner-led clinic. Data were analysed descriptively. Results: Over the study period, 253 patients (122 male and 131 female) attended the clinic. The mean age was 70.27 ± 10.48 years, and at baseline most had either chronic kidney disease grade 3A (32.8%) or 3B (41.5%). For the majority of those who remained in the clinic, kidney function remained stable or slightly improved. A large proportion were within recommended target ranges for systolic (85.6%) and diastolic (98%) blood pressure although many had high BMI (mean 31.99 ± 6.47) and HbA1c (57.1%). Conclusion: The nephrology nurse practitioner-led clinic demonstrated effectiveness in addressing CKD targets for patients and provides an opportunity to transform traditional primary and specialist healthcare delivery. What is already known about the topic? Early intervention in chronic kidney disease (CKD) can slow or halt the progression of the disease, reducing long-term burden and healthcare costs. An integrated model of care including primary and specialist providers is considered optimal for the early detection and treatment of CKD. An integrated nephrology nurse practitioner model is an emerging model of care for CKD patients. However, studies investigating the cost-effectiveness, efficacy, and characteristics of this model compared to specialist or primary care in Australia are lacking. What this paper adds: This paper describes the characteristics and outcomes of a nephrology nurse practitioner-led outpatient clinic embedded within a multidisciplinary model of care. The majority of patients who remained in nephrology nurse practitioner care maintained recommended CKD targets. The findings provide evidence that nephrology nurse practitioners are able to manage patients with less advanced CKD grades who have comorbid conditions and other health risk-factors.

Nurse Practitioner Care, Scope of Practice, and End-of-Life Outcomes for Nursing Home Residents With Dementia

Nursing home residents with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD) often receive burdensome care at the end of life. Nurse practitioners (NPs) provide an increasing share of primary care in nursing homes, but how NP care is associated with end-of-life outcomes for this population is unknown. To examine the association of NP care with end-of-life outcomes for nursing home residents with ADRD and assess whether these associations differ according to state-level NP scope of practice regulations. This cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare claims included 334 618 US nursing home residents with ADRD who died between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. Data were analyzed from April 6, 2015, to December 31, 2018. Share of nursing home primary care visits by NPs, classified as minimal (<10% of visits), moderate (10%-50% of visits), and extensive (>50% of visits). State NP scope of practice regulations were classified as full vs restrictive in 2 domains: practice authority (authorization to practice and prescribe independently) and do-not-resuscitate (DNR) authority (authorization to sign DNR orders). Hospitalization within the last 30 days of life and death with hospice. Linear probability models with hospital referral region fixed effects controlling for resident characteristics, visit volume, and geographic factors were used to estimate whether the associations between NP care and outcomes varied across states with different scope of practice regulations. Among 334 618 nursing home decedents (mean [SD] age at death, 86.6 [8.2] years; 69.3% female), 40.5% received minimal NP care, 21.4% received moderate NP care, and 38.0% received extensive NP care. Adjusted hospitalization rates were lower for residents with extensive NP care (31.6% [95% CI, 31.4%-31.9%]) vs minimal NP care (32.3% [95% CI, 32.1%-32.6%]), whereas adjusted hospice rates were higher for residents with extensive (55.6% [95% CI, 55.3%-55.9%]) vs minimal (53.6% [95% CI, 53.3%-53.8%]) NP care. However, there was significant variation by state scope of practice. For example, in full practice authority states, adjusted hospice rates were 2.88 percentage points higher (95% CI, 1.99-3.77; P < .001) for residents with extensive vs minimal NP care, but the difference between these same groups was 1.77 percentage points (95% CI, 1.32-2.23; P < .001) in restricted practice states. Hospitalization rates were 1.76 percentage points lower (95% CI, -2.52 to -1.00; P < .001) for decedents with extensive vs minimal NP care in full practice authority states, but the difference between these same groups in restricted practice states was only 0.43 percentage points (95% CI, -0.84 to -0.01; P < .04). Similar patterns were observed in analyses focused on DNR authority. The findings of this cohort study suggest that NPs appear to be important care providers during the end-of-life period for many nursing home residents with ADRD and that regulations governing NP scope of practice may have implications for end-of-life hospitalizations and hospice use in this population.

Inappropriate Prescribing to Older Patients by Nurse Practitioners and Primary Care Physicians.

Inappropriate Prescribing to Older Patients by Nurse Practitioners and Primary Care Physicians.

Inappropriate Prescribing to Older Patients by Nurse Practitioners and Primary Care Physicians.

Inappropriate Prescribing to Older Patients by Nurse Practitioners and Primary Care Physicians.

Inappropriate Prescribing to Older Patients by Nurse Practitioners and Primary Care Physicians.

Inappropriate Prescribing to Older Patients by Nurse Practitioners and Primary Care Physicians.

Treatment of Anxiety Disorders in Primary Care: What Nurse Practitioners Need to Know.

Anxiety disorders are the most common mental illnesses and frequently co-occur with other mental and somatic symptoms or disorders. Primary care nurse practitioners (NPs) are key in reducing the treatment gap through early identification, treatment, and/or referral to behavioral health providers. Confronting primary care NPs are problems with time constraints, multiple comorbidities, and limited mental health training, particularly in relation to the differences in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic actions of first-line anxiety disorder medications across age groups. The current article provides a brief summary of evidence-based treatment focusing on pharmacotherapy for anxiety disorders in the primary care setting. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 62(5), 7-10.].

Bridging the Gap Between Practicing Nurse Practitioners and Adult-Gerontology Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Post-Master’s Curriculum

The job growth for nurse practitioners (NPs) will exponentially grow by 2026 as registered nurses transition into this advanced practice role. Education is aligning with scope of practice. Although practice readiness has been looked at in the literature for new graduate nurses and new graduate NPs, the literature is lacking when describing practice readiness for NPs currently in practice who are back for a post-master’s certificate. This report describes the concept of practice readiness and how one school successfully prepares its students for clinical practice using a multimodal approach of didactic, simulation, and case-based learning.

Primary care nurse practitioners' perceptions and experiences communicating with adults about adverse childhood experiences.

Clinical communication focused on childhood adversity has not been well described in the extant literature. There is a wealth of knowledge about patient-centered communication, including patient-centered communication techniques involving the discussion of health risks in primary care. However, there remain gaps in our understanding of the role that communication plays in exploring adverse childhood experience (ACE) exposure among adults in the clinical context. To better understand factors that influence how nurse practitioners (NPs) communicate with adults about ACEs in the context of primary care while simultaneously exploring NPs' perceptions and experiences of their ability to communicate with adults about ACE exposure. Guided by the Patient-to-Provider Communication of Adverse Childhood Experiences in Primary Care (PPC-ACE) Model, an exploratory, qualitative, descriptive study was conducted among 15 US-based primary care NPs. Nurse practitioner's participated in semistructured interviews, which were recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Atlas.ti provided supplemental data visualization. Demographic data, practice characteristics, and baseline ACEs knowledge were collected by means of Qualtrics. Key themes described communication approaches and perceived barriers and facilitators to ACE-related conversations. Scope of practice, provider biases, diversity in practice models, and secondary trauma were factors NPs' perceived as positively or negatively influencing ACE-related communication in primary care. Outcomes from this study provided deeper insights into the various influencers of NP-perceived, ACE-related, patient-centered communication among adults in primary care. Findings will inform future research focused on ACE-related communication in primary care in the domains of NP education, practice, and health policy.

The Orthopaedic NP Workforce: Results From a Nationally Representative Survey.

Although a growing number of nurse practitioners (NPs) are practicing in orthopaedics, little is known about the workforce. The aim of this study was to estimate the size of the orthopaedic NP workforce, compare it with the workforce of primary care NPs, and investigate the interaction effect specialty NP practice and physician relationships have on NP role perception. We selected licensed, practicing orthopaedic and primary care NPs from the 2018 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses and compared demographics, education, experience, functional autonomy, and job outcomes. Nationally, 2,796 NPs described their specialty as orthopaedics. Compared with primary care NPs, they spent 27% more time on care coordination, were half as likely to have their own patient panel, and were most likely to say that their NP education was fully utilized when in a collaborative relationship with physicians. Differences between orthopaedic and primary care NPs may call for reform of Consensus Model that currently places specialty practice outside its regulatory network.

Referral Versus Embedded Palliative Care Consultation Among People Hospitalized With Heart Failure: A Report From a Single Center Pilot Program

ContextDespite calls for integration into routine heart failure (HF) care, optimal palliative care delivery for people living with HF remains unclear. ObjectivesDescribe an innovative model of an embedded palliative care nurse practitioner (NP) within a HF team. Compare demographics and utilization among people hospitalized with HF receiving referral or embedded consultation. MethodsUsing an electronic health record-based palliative care registry, we conducted descriptive analyses and t‐tests and χ2 tests, as appropriate, to examine bivariate associations between sociodemographic, clinical and utilization data of hospitalized people with HF receiving a traditional, referral-based palliative care consultation generated exclusively by the primary team vs. a novel, embedded-based consultation generated by collaboration between a palliative care NP and the advanced HF team at an urban, quaternary care academic medical center in New York City. ResultsDuring the study period from January 1, 2019–December 31, 2021, consultation volume nearly doubled with 363 consults from traditional referrals and an additional 317 consults from the newly embedded NP. People in the embedded group, as compared to referral, were younger (mean age: 60.1 vs. 71.9 years (2019); 59.2 vs. 70.4 (2020); 61.3 vs. 69.6 (2021), p-value < 0.001), more functional (median Karnofsky Performance Status: 40% vs. 30%, p-value = 0.01 (2019); 40% vs 20%, p-value < 0.0001 (2020); 40% vs. 20%, p-value = 0.02 (2021)), more likely had capacity to designate a medical decision maker (56.4% vs. 20.6%, p-value < 0.001 (2020); 76.3% vs. 49.5%, p-value < 0.001 (2021)), received earlier consultation (median days before discharge: 9.5 vs. 4 (2019); 11 vs. 5 (2020); 7 vs. 3 (2021), p-value ≤ 0.001), and more likely to discharge home (60% vs. 26%, p-value ≤ 0.001 (2019); 62.7% vs 20.6%, p-value ≤ 0.001 (2020); 42.3% vs. 28%, p-value = 0.03 (2021)). ConclusionHospitalized people living with advanced HF who received an embedded palliative care consult were younger, had higher functional status and less illness severity compared to those served by a traditional, referral-based consult.

The Perspectives of Advanced Practice Provider Directors on Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Alignment and Hiring.

Demand for acute care is forecasted to grow in the United States. To meet this demand, nurse practitioners (NPs) are increasingly employed in acute care settings. Yet, there is concern about an adequate supply of acute care NPs given demand. Further, professional nursing organizations recommend aligning an NP's role with their education, certification, licensure, and practice. Given workforce constraints and the policy environment, little is known about how hospitals approach hiring NPs for acute care roles. The purpose of this study was to explore advanced practice provider (APP) directors' approaches to hiring NPs within the context of alignment and describe factors that influence hiring decisions. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 APP directors in hospitals and health systems. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded using an iterative, hybrid inductive and deductive method. Two themes emerged: (1) local factors that inform aligned hiring and (2) adaptive hiring responses to changing environments. Practices around hiring NPs varied across institutions influenced by organization and state policies and regulations, workforce availability, and institutional culture. Most APP directors recognized trends towards hiring aligned NPs for acute care roles. However, they also identified barriers to fully aligning their NP workforce and described adaptive strategies including hiring physician assistants, building relationships with APP schools, and leveraging hospital resources to develop the APP workforce to meet care delivery demands given the current NP workforce supply. Future research is needed to assess widespread practices around acute care NP alignment and the implications of alignment for patient and organizational outcomes.

Summary for Patients: Inappropriate Prescribing to Older Patients by Nurse Practitioners and Primary Care Physicians.

Summary for Patients: Inappropriate Prescribing to Older Patients by Nurse Practitioners and Primary Care Physicians.

Inappropriate Prescribing to Older Patients by Nurse Practitioners and Primary Care Physicians.

Many U.S. states have legislated to allow nurse practitioners (NPs) to independently prescribe drugs. Critics contend that these moves will adversely affect quality of care. To compare rates of inappropriate prescribing among NPs and primary care physicians. Rates of inappropriate prescribing were calculated and compared for 23 669 NPs and 50 060 primary care physicians who wrote prescriptions for 100 or more patients per year, with adjustment for practice experience, patient volume and risk, clinical setting, year, and state. 29 states that had granted NPs prescriptive authority by 2019. Medicare Part D beneficiaries aged 65 years or older in 2013 to 2019. Inappropriate prescriptions, defined as drugs that typically should not be prescribed for adults aged 65 years or older, according to the American Geriatrics Society's Beers Criteria. Mean rates of inappropriate prescribing by NPs and primary care physicians were virtually identical (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.97 to 1.01]; crude rates, 1.63 vs. 1.69 per 100 prescriptions; adjusted rates, 1.66 vs. 1.68). However, NPs were overrepresented among clinicians with the highest and lowest rates of inappropriate prescribing. For both types of practitioners, discrepancies in inappropriate prescribing rates across states tended to be larger than discrepancies between these practitioners within states. The Beers Criteria addresses the appropriateness of a selected subset of drugs and may not be valid in some clinical settings. Nurse practitioners were no more likely than physicians to prescribe inappropriately to older patients. Broad efforts to improve the performance of all clinicians who prescribe may be more effective than limiting independent prescriptive authority to physicians. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and National Science Foundation.

Full practice authority and burnout among primary care nurse practitioners

BackgroundFull practice authority (FPA) improves clinical autonomy for nurse practitioners (NPs). Autonomy may reduce burnout. PurposeEstimate the effect of changing from reduced or restricted practice authority to FPA on NP burnout. MethodsIn this quasi-experimental study, we compared NP burnout before (2016) and after (2018) a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) regulation authorized NP FPA. Burnout proportions were estimated for VHA facilities by aggregating responses to the VHA's All Employee Survey from 1,352 primary care NPs. DiscussionSeventy-seven percent of facilities changed to FPA postregulation. Burnout was six points lower among NPs in facilities that changed to FPA compared to facilities that had FPA prior to the regulation; however, this association was not statistically significant. ConclusionNPs are increasingly working under independent practice. While changing to FPA did not reduce NP burnout, this association may vary by health care setting or when burnout is measured for individuals or teams.

The Impact of Primary Care Practice Structural Capabilities on Nurse Practitioner Burnout, Job Satisfaction, and Intent to Leave.

Lack of structure for care delivery (ie, structural capabilities) has been linked to lower quality of care and negative patient outcomes. However, little research examines the relationship between practice structural capabilities and nurse practitioner (NP) job outcomes. We investigated the association between structural capabilities and primary care NP job outcomes (ie, burnout, job dissatisfaction, and intent to leave). Secondary analysis of 2018-2019 cross-sectional data. A total of 1110 NPs across 1002 primary care practices in 6 states. We estimated linear probability models to assess the association between structural capabilities and NP job outcomes, controlling for NP work environment, demographics, and practice features. The average structural capabilities score (measured on a scale of 0-1) across practices was 0.6 (higher score indicates more structural capabilities). After controlling for potential confounders, we found that a 10-percentage point increase in the structural capabilities score was associated with a 3-percentage point decrease in burnout ( P <0.001), a 2-percentage point decrease in job dissatisfaction ( P <0.001), and a 3-percentage point decrease in intent to leave ( P <0.001). Primary care NPs report lower burnout, job dissatisfaction, and intent to leave when working in practices with greater structural capabilities for care delivery. These findings suggest that efforts to improve structural capabilities not only facilitate effective care delivery and benefit patients but they also support NPs and strengthen their workforce participation. Practice leaders should further invest in structural capabilities to improve primary care provider job outcomes.

Acute Care Interprofessional Event Improved Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Athletic Training and Nurse Practitioner Students

Objective In this study, we sought to assess the changes in the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of athletic training program (ATP) and nurse practitioner (NP) graduate students before and after an acute care interprofessional education (IPE) workshop. Design and Setting This was a descriptive KAP survey to be taken by participants before and after the IPE event. This survey was administered using a QR code that participants scanned. The study occurred at the University of Central Florida College of Nursing before and after acute care skills were taught and practiced by each program’s students. Patients or Other Participants A total of 35 students from a professional master’s ATP and an adult gerontology acute care NP program were present at the workshop. Thirty-two students took the preworkshop survey, while 30 students completed the postworkshop survey. Main Outcome Measure(s) In this study, we aimed to measure the change in perceptions about the knowledge, skills, teaching, and IPE understanding of each respective program after the educational workshop. Surveys were distributed before the IPE workshop and then again after the workshop concluded. The survey responses were scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores for each section were averaged, and statistical analysis was done using repeated measures analyses of variance for total and subsection scores for both programs. Results A significant increase was found for each group in IPE understanding, knowledge, skills, and teaching scoring (P &amp;lt; .05) with moderate to large effect sizes. Conclusions Participating in this acute care IPE workshop showed significant increases in perceptions of the KAP among ATP and NP students.