Care For Rare Diseases Research Articles

Telehealth for rare disease care, research, and education across the globe: A review of the literature by the IRDiRC telehealth task force

The International Rare Diseases Research Consortium (IRDiRC) Telehealth (TH) Task Force explored the use of TH for improving diagnosis, care, research, and education for rare diseases (RDs). The Task Force reviewed related literature published from January 2017 to August 2023, and identified various models and implementation strategies of TH for RD. The Task Force highlighted the reported value and benefits of using TH for RDs, along with the limitations and opportunities. The number of publications sharply increased since 2021, coinciding with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, which forced the rapid adoption of TH in many healthcare settings. One of the major benefits of TH for RDs lies in its capacity to surmount geographical barriers, which helps in overcoming the constraints posed by limited numbers and geographical dispersion of specialists. This was evident during the pandemic when TH was used to maintain a level of continued medical care and research when face-to-face visits were severely restricted. TH, through which clinical research can be decentralized, can also facilitate and enhance RD research by decreasing burden, expanding access, and enhancing efficiency. This will be especially beneficial when coupled with the adoption of digital health technologies, such as mobile health (mHealth) and wearable devices for remote monitoring (i.e., surveillance of outpatient data transmitted through devices), along with big data solutions. TH has also been shown to be an effective means for RD education and peer mentoring, enabling local health care providers (HCPs) to care for RD patients, which indirectly ensures that RD patients get the expertise and multidisciplinary care they need. However, limitations and weaknesses associated with using TH for RD care and research were also identified, including the inability to perform physical examinations and build relationships with HCPs. Therefore, TH has been recommended as a complement to, rather than substitute for, face-to-face consultations. There is also a concern that TH may lead to an amplification of health disparities and inequities related to social determinants of health for those with RDs due to lack of access to TH technologies, inadequate digital literacy, and geographical, socio-cultural, and linguistic barriers. Finally, the Task Force also discussed evidence and knowledge gaps that will benefit from future research efforts to help advance and expand the use of TH for RD care, research, and education.

Latent profiles and predictors of barriers to care in Swiss children and adolescents with rare diseases.

Children and adolescents with rare diseases face significant barriers when accessing healthcare. We aimed to assess and predict these barriers and investigate associations with health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We conducted a cross-sectional survey of Swiss parents (N = 189) of children with rare diseases including the Barriers to Care Questionnaire (BCQ), containing six barriers and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to uncover distinct classes, which were compared using chi-square tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. Relevant medical and sociodemographic class predictors were identified using Elastic Net regression, followed by regression analysis to investigate their role in predicting barriers to care and examine the effects of these classes on HRQoL. Two distinct groups were identified, a higher barriers class (59%) and a lower barriers class (41%). In the higher barriers class, participants showed elevated scores across all subscales and specifically on pragmatics and expectations. More barriers to care were linked to a nonstable disease course (OR = 2.27, p = .002) and a diagnosis after the age of 3months (OR = 2.17, p = .006). Individuals in the higher barriers class exhibited more psychological comorbidities (p = .044), congenital malformations/deformations/chromosomal abnormalities (p=.042), and medical misdiagnoses (p = .006). Children in the higher barriers class had significantly lower PedsQL scores compared to the lower barriers class (p<.05). This study highlights the need for comprehensive assessment of barriers to pediatric care in rare diseases, offering potential entry points for targeted interventions.

Preferences for coordinated care for rare diseases: discrete choice experiment

BackgroundEvidence suggests that coordination of care for people affected by rare diseases is poor. In order to improve the way that care is coordinated it is necessary to understand the preferences of people affected by these conditions, and providers. The aim of this study was to examine patient, parent and carer, and health care professional preferences for different attributes of care coordination for people affected by rare diseases. We conducted a discrete choice experiment using online surveys. There were no restrictions on participants in terms of rare conditions, demographic factors other than age, or geographical location within the UK. Choice scenarios were based on the following attributes: annual cost of attending appointments; access to health records; access to clinical expertise; support of a care coordinator; access to a specialist centre; and, the existence of a documented plan for emergency care. Data were analysed using alternative-specific conditional logit regression models.ResultsValid responses were obtained from 996 individuals (528 patients, 280 carers, 188 health care professionals) between August and December 2019. All attributes significantly influenced the type of service respondents preferred. Patients, carers and health professionals’ preferences for care coordination were influenced by: the cost of attending appointments; access to health records; clinical expertise; role of care coordinators; access to specialist centres; and the existence of plan for emergency care. There were no statistically significant differences in the preferences between patients and carers. Preferences of health professionals differed to those of patients and carers. Both patients and carers selected responses which granted them a greater degree of autonomy in relation to the role of care coordinators, whereas health professionals preferred services where care coordinators had more autonomy. Health care professionals also expressed a stronger preference for a documented formal emergency plan to be in place.ConclusionsThe findings highlight that people value better coordinated care, in line with policy documents emphasising commitments to coordinated care for people affected by rare diseases. This study highlights the factors that could be included in service provision as ways of improving the coordination of care for people affected by rare diseases.

The Use of AI in Detecting Rare Diseases

Rare diseases, affecting fewer than 1 in 2,000 individuals, present significant challenges in diagnosis and treatment due to their diversity, limited clinical data, and lack of awareness among healthcare professionals. Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a valuable tool in rare disease detection, leveraging large datasets and machine learning algorithms to analyze symptoms, genetic data, and medical literature. This paper investigates how AI enhances diagnostic accuracy, shortens the diagnostic process, and addresses the complexities associated with rare diseases. Additionally, we examine case studies, discuss the ethical considerations of AI-based diagnosis, and highlight the potential for AI to revolutionize rare disease care. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Rare Diseases, Machine Learning, Diagnosis, Genetic Testing.

Medical Genetics in Brazil in the 21st Century: A Thriving Specialty and Its Incorporation in Public Health Policies.

Brazil is a continent-size country with 203 million inhabitants, classified as a developing upper-middle-income country, although inequities remain significant. Most of the population is assisted by the public Unified Health System (SUS), along with a thriving private health sector. Congenital malformations are the second leading cause of infant mortality and chronic/genetic disorders and a significant burden in hospital admissions. The past two decades have been crucial for formalizing medical genetics as a recognized medical specialty in the SUS, as well as for implementing a new health policy by the Ministry of Health for comprehensive care for rare diseases. These public health policies had the broad support of the Brazilian Society of Medical Genetics and Genomics and patient organizations. Most comprehensive genetic services are concentrated in large urban centers in the South and Southeast regions of Brazil; with this new policy, new services throughout the country are progressively being integrated. The number of medical geneticists increased by 103% in a decade. Details on the policy and an overview of the availability of services, testing, human resources, newborn screening, research projects, patient organizations, and relevant issues regarding medical genetics in this vast and diverse country are presented.

Supporting positive patient experiences for rare disease care during disruptive times: findings from a national study

Supporting positive patient experiences for rare disease care during disruptive times: findings from a national study

Can German Health Insurance Claims Data Fill Information Gaps in Rare Chronic Diseases: Use Case of Haemophilia A.

Claims data are increasingly discussed to evaluate health care for rare diseases (resource consumption, outcomes and costs). Using haemophilia A (HA) as a use case, this analysis aimed to generate evidence for the aforementioned information using German Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) claims data. Claims data (2017-2019) from the German SHI 'AOK Bayern - Die Gesundheitskasse' were used. Patients with ICD-10-GM codes D66 and HA medication were included in descriptive analyses. Severity levels were categorized according to HA medication consumption. In total, 257 patients were identified: mild HA, 104 patients (mean age: 40.0 years; SD: 22.9); moderate HA, 17 patients, (51.2 years; SD: 24.5); severe HA, 128 patients, (34.2 years; SD: 18.5). There were eight patients categorized with inhibitors (37.8 years; SD: 29.6). Psychotherapy was reported among 28.8% (mild) to 32.8% (severe) of patients. Joint disease was documented for 46.2% (mild) to 61.7% (severe) of patients. Mean direct costs per patient per year were 1.34× for mild, 11× for moderate, 81× higher for severe HA patients and 223× higher for inhibitor patients than the mean annual expenditure per AOK Bayern insurant (2019). German SHI data provide comprehensive information. The patient burden in HA is significant with respect to joint disease and psychological stress regardless of the HA severity level. The cost of HA care for patients is high. Large cost ranges suggest that the individual situation of a patient must be considered when interpreting costs. The main limitation of SHI data analysis for HA was the lack of granularity of ICD codes.

HPR81 Multi-Stakeholder Approach to Rare Disease Care in Latin America

HPR81 Multi-Stakeholder Approach to Rare Disease Care in Latin America

Identifying key health system components associated with improved outcomes to inform the re-configuration of services for adults with rare autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a mixed-methods study

Adults with rare autoimmune rheumatic diseases face unique challenges and struggles to navigate health-care systems designed to manage common conditions. Evidence to inform an optimal service framework for their care is scarce. Using systemic vasculitis as an exemplar, we aimed to identify and explain the key service components underpinning effective care for rare diseases. In this mixed-methods study, data were collected as part of a survey of vasculitis service providers across the UK and Ireland, interviews with patients, and from organisational case studies to identify key service components that enable good care. The association between these components and patient outcomes (eg, serious infections, mortality) and provider outcomes (eg, emergency hospital admissions) were examined in a population-based data linkage study using routine health-care data obtained from patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis from national health datasets in Scotland. We did univariable and multivariable analyses using Bayesian poisson and negative binomial regression to estimate incident rate ratios (IRRs), and Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). People with lived experiences were involved in the research and writing process. Good care was characterised by service components that supported timely access to services, integrated care, and expertise. In 1420 patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis identified from national health datasets, service-reported average waiting times for new patients of less than 1 week were associated with fewer serious infections (IRR 0·70 [95% credibility interval 0·55-0·88]) and fewer emergency hospital admissions (0·78 [0·68-0·92]). Nurse-led advice lines were associated with fewer serious infections (0·76 [0·58-0·93]) and fewer emergency hospital admissions (0·85 [0·74-0·96]). Average waiting times for new patients of less than 1 week were also associated with reduced mortality (HR 0·59 [95% credibility interval 0·37-0·93]). Cohorted clinics, nurse-led clinics, and specialist vasculitis multi-disciplinary team meetings were associated with fewer serious infections (IRR 0·75 [0·59-0·96] for cohorted clinics; 0·65 [0·39-0·84] for nurse-led clinics; 0·72 [0·57-0·90] for specialist vasculitis multi-disciplinary team meetings) and emergency hospital admissions (0·81 [0·71-0·91]; 0·75 [0·65-0·94]; 0·86 [0·75-0·96]). Key components were characterised by their ability to overcome professional tensions between specialties. Key service components associated with important health outcomes and underpinning factors were identified to inform initiatives to improve the design, delivery, and effectiveness of health-care models for rare autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Versus Arthritis.

Centralization of care for rare genetic syndromes associated with cancer: improving outcomes and advancing research on VHL disease.

Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is a rare genetic syndrome caused by a germline pathogenic variant in one VHL allele. Any somatic event disrupting the other allele induces VHL protein (pVHL) loss of function, ultimately leading to patients developing multiple tumours in multiple organs at multiple timepoints, and reducing life expectancy. Treatment of this complex, rare disease is often fragmented, as patients visit specialist clinicians in isolation at different medical centres. Consequently, patients can receive sub-optimal treatment that results in decreased quality of life and a poor experience of health care systems. In 2021, we established a comprehensive clinical centre at San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, devoted to VHL disease. The centre provides a structured programme for the diagnosis, surveillance and treatment of patients alongside research into VHL disease and involves a multidisciplinary team of dedicated physicians. This programme demonstrates the benefits of care centralization, including concentration of knowledge and services, synergy and multidisciplinary management, improved networking and patient resources, reducing health care costs, and fostering research and innovation. VHL disease provides an ideal model to assess the advantages of centralizing care for rare disease and represents an unparalleled opportunity to broaden our understanding of cancer biology in general.

PIK3CA-Related Disorders: From Disease Mechanism to Evidence-Based Treatments.

Recent advances in genetic sequencing are transforming our approach to rare-disease care. Initially identified in cancer, gain-of-function mutations of the PIK3CA gene are also detected in malformation mosaic diseases categorized as PIK3CA-related disorders (PRDs). Over the past decade, new approaches have enabled researchers to elucidate the pathophysiology of PRDs and uncover novel therapeutic options. In just a few years, owing to vigorous global research efforts, PRDs have been transformed from incurable diseases to chronic disorders accessible to targeted therapy. However, new challenges for both medical practitioners and researchers have emerged. Areas of uncertainty remain in our comprehension of PRDs, especially regarding the relationship between genotype and phenotype, the mechanisms underlying mosaicism, and the processes involved in intercellular communication. As the clinical and biological landscape of PRDs is constantly evolving, this review aims to summarize current knowledge regarding PIK3CA and its role in nonmalignant human disease, from molecular mechanisms to evidence-based treatments.

Genotype-phenotype correlation in Prader-Willi syndrome: A large-sample analysis in China.

The genotype-phenotype relationship in PWS patients is important for a better understanding of the clinical phenotype and clinical characteristics of different genotypes of PWS in children. We aimed to explore the influence of specific gene changes on the clinical symptoms of PWS and the value of early screening and early intervention of the condition. All data in this study were extracted from the database of the XiaoPang Weili Rare Disease Care Center. The collected information included basic demographics, maternal pregnancy information, endocrine abnormalities, growth and development abnormalities, and other clinical phenotypes. The relationships between genotypes and phenotypes in the major categories of PWS were analyzed. A total of 586 PWS cases with confirmed molecular diagnosis and genotyping were included in this study. Among them, 83.8% belonged to the deletion type, 10.9% the uniparental disomy (UPD) type, and 5.3% the imprinting defect (ID) type. Age-wide comparison among the three groups: The rate of hypopigmentation in the deletion group was higher than that in the UPD group (88.8% vs. 60.9%; p < 0.05); A total of 62 patients (14.2%) had epilepsy; and no statistical significance was found among the three groups (p = 0.110). Age-wide comparison between the deletion and non-deletion types: the rate of skin hypopigmentation and epilepsy in the deletion group was significantly higher than that in the non-deletion group (88.8% vs. 68.4%, p < 0.001; 15.9% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.040). The intergroup comparison for the >2-year age group: there were significant intergroup differences in the language development delay among the three groups (p < 0.001). The incidence of delayed language development was the highest in the deletion group, followed by the UPD group, and the lowest in the ID group. The rates of obesity and hyperphagia in the deletion group were also higher than those in the non-deletion group (71.1% vs. 58.9%, p = 0.041; 75.7% vs. 62.0%, p = 0.016). There are significant differences in the rates of skin hypopigmentation and language developmental delay among the deletion, UPD, and ID genotypes. The patients with deletion type had significantly higher rates of lighter skin color, obesity, hyperphagia, language developmental delay, and epilepsy. The results of this study will help clinicians better understand the impact of different PWS molecular etiologies on specific phenotypes.

Assessing the quality and value of metabolic chart data for capturing core outcomes for pediatric medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency

BackgroundGenerating rigorous evidence to inform care for rare diseases requires reliable, sustainable, and longitudinal measurement of priority outcomes. Having developed a core outcome set for pediatric medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency, we aimed to assess the feasibility of prospective measurement of these core outcomes during routine metabolic clinic visits.MethodsWe used existing cohort data abstracted from charts of 124 children diagnosed with MCAD deficiency who participated in a Canadian study which collected data from birth to a maximum of 11 years of age to investigate the frequency of clinic visits and quality of metabolic chart data for selected outcomes. We recorded all opportunities to collect outcomes from the medical chart as a function of visit rate to the metabolic clinic, by treatment centre and by child age. We applied a data quality framework to evaluate data based on completeness, conformance, and plausibility for four core MCAD outcomes: emergency department use, fasting time, metabolic decompensation, and death.ResultsThe frequency of metabolic clinic visits decreased with increasing age, from a rate of 2.8 visits per child per year (95% confidence interval, 2.3–3.3) among infants 2 to 6 months, to 1.0 visit per child per year (95% confidence interval, 0.9–1.2) among those ≥ 5 years of age. Rates of emergency department visits followed anticipated trends by child age. Supplemental findings suggested that some emergency visits occur outside of the metabolic care treatment centre but are not captured. Recommended fasting times were updated relatively infrequently in patients’ metabolic charts. Episodes of metabolic decompensation were identifiable but required an operational definition based on acute manifestations most commonly recorded in the metabolic chart. Deaths occurred rarely in these patients and quality of mortality data was not evaluated.ConclusionsOpportunities to record core outcomes at the metabolic clinic occur at least annually for children with MCAD deficiency. Methods to comprehensively capture emergency care received at outside institutions are needed. To reduce substantial heterogeneous recording of core outcome across treatment centres, improved documentation standards are required for recording of recommended fasting times and a consensus definition for metabolic decompensations needs to be developed and implemented.

Rare disease care in Europe – Gaping unmet needs

In Europe, which provides its citizens with the highest level of social protection in the world, the needs of rare disease patients remain fundamentally unmet. The overwhelming majority of rare diseases still have no treatment or cure; infant mortality is unspeakably high; and when a safe and effective rare disease treatment is developed, patient access can vary dramatically from one EU Member State to the next, raising basic questions of health equity. The goal of this article is to advocate for an ambitious and far-reaching reform of the EU’s Orphan Drug Regulation framework, by showing how very difficult things are for Europe’s rare disease patients, in so many different ways, and on so many different levels.

OP165 Changing Decision Criteria: An Analysis Of Health Technology Assessment Reports To The Brazilian Unified Health System

IntroductionIn Brazil, the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation of the Brazilian Public Health System (Conitec) defines the criteria for incorporating technologies into the public health system. However, all recommendations are submitted to public consultations to ensure transparency and public participation.Contributions from the public consultation are analyzed and entered into Conitec’s final report and sometimes change the preliminary recommendation.MethodsThis descriptive, retrospective exploratory study aimed to gather qualitative and quantitative data on criteria considered by healthcare decision makers from Conitec and to identify which criteria most changed after reports were submitted to public consultation. Data from 2012 to November 2022 were collected from the Conitec website, entered into a specific extraction form, and analyzed using descriptive statistics.ResultsMedicines (77%) were the most frequently evaluated type of technology, followed by procedures (15%), and products (8%). A total of 763 recommendations were analyzed. Of these, 70 percent did not change the decision criteria from the preliminary to the final published report, 9 percent did change, and 20 percent were simplified analyses of technologies of relevant public interest that were of low cost and low budget impact (these were not submitted to public consultation or public hearing). As pharmaceutical companies usually propose cost reductions or discounts during the Conitec public consultations, most of the recommendations (45%) were modified in the final report, with incremental budgetary reduction being the main criterion. This study identified that most of the changes occurred in neurology and were related to the high incremental budgetary impact of technologies for the care of rare diseases like spinal muscular atrophy.ConclusionsAlthough different criteria are considered for Conitec recommendations, some of these are regarded as crucial for decision-making. Unfortunately, as there is no definition for the weight of each of these criteria, it is difficult to understand their influence on the recommendations made. Therefore, it is crucial to establish standardized criteria for proper decision-making.

An Ethics Action Plan for Rare Disease Care: Participatory Action Research Approach.

Owing to their low prevalence, rare diseases are poorly addressed in the scientific literature and clinical practice guidelines. Thus, health care workers are inadequately equipped to provide timely diagnoses, appropriate treatment, and support for these poorly understood conditions. These clinical tribulations are experienced as moral challenges by patients, jeopardizing their life trajectories, dreams, and aspirations. This paper presents an ethical action plan for rare disease care and the process underlying its development. This action plan was designed through an ethical inquiry conducted by the Ethics and Rare Diseases Working Group, which included 3 patient partners, 2 clinician researchers, and 1 representative from Québec's rare disease association. The plan is structured into 4 components. Component A presents the key moral challenges encountered by patients, which are the lack of knowledge on rare diseases among health care workers, the problematic attitudes that it sometimes elicits, and the distress and powerlessness experienced by patients. Component B emphasizes a vision for patient partnership in rare disease care characterized by open-mindedness, empathy, respect, and support of patient autonomy from health care workers. Component C outlines 2 courses of action prompted by this vision: raising awareness among health care workers and empowering patients to better navigate their care. Component D compares several interventions that could help integrate these 2 courses of action in rare disease care. Overall, this action plan represents a toolbox that provides a review of multiple possible interventions for policy makers, hospital managers, practitioners, researchers, and patient associations to critically reflect on key moral challenges experienced by patients with rare diseases and ways to mitigate them. This paper also prompts reflection on the values underlying rare disease care, patient experiences, and health care workers' beliefs and behaviors. Health care workers and patients were the primary beneficiaries of this action plan.

Effectiveness of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test in people with Prader-Willi syndrome.

Evaluating intelligence using conventional tools is very complex in patients with Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS), as it is time consuming and requires levels of care that are difficult to sustain for this population. Therefore, we explore the ability of a brief test to assess intelligence in these patients. This study included individuals with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of PWS, with regular attendance at transdisciplinary treatment in an institution dedicated to the care of rare diseases in Argentina. The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV), the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III) and the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) were used. Correlation was obtained between the scales in paediatric and adult populations. Within the paediatric population, no significant differences were identified between the WISC-IV scale (Wechsler for paediatrics) and the K-BIT (56.4±8.6, vs. 53.4±10.1, P=0.28), with a good agreement between the methods {intraclass correlation 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15-0.95]}. Regarding the adult population, the discrimination of the WAIS-III scale (Wechsler for adults) and the K-BIT of adults (16years and over) presented an acceptable concordance [0.77 (95% CI -0.09; 0.93)], although also underestimating the results (58.3±7.2 vs. 51.1±11.2, P<0.0001). We observed the feasibility and potential usefulness of a brief intelligence test (K-BIT) in patients with PWS with an acceptable agreement with conventional tools.

Improving quality of life in patients with rare autoimmune liver diseases by structured peer-delivered support (Q.RARE.LI): study protocol for a transnational effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial

BackgroundPsychosocial support is a crucial component of adequate rare disease care, but to date psychosocial support needs of this patient population are insufficiently met. Within Q.RARE.LI, we strive to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured, transdiagnostic, and location-independent psychosocial support intervention in routine care of patients with rare autoimmune liver diseases in five countries and prepare its implementation.MethodsWithin an effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial, we aim to a) investigate the effectiveness of the intervention in routine care in five diverse healthcare systems and b) assess implementation outcomes, examine and prepare the implementation context, and develop country-specific implementation strategies. To assess effectiveness, we will include N = 240 patients with rare autoimmune liver diseases. Within a two-armed randomized controlled trial (allocation ratio 1:1), we will compare structured and peer-delivered psychosocial support in addition to care-as-usual (CAU) with CAU alone. Outcomes will be assessed via electronic database entry prior to intervention, directly after, and at a three-month follow-up. Our primary effectiveness outcome will be mental health-related quality of life at post-assessment. Secondary outcomes include depression and anxiety severity, perceived social support, helplessness, and disease acceptance. Implementation outcomes will be assessed within a mixed-methods process evaluation. In a quantitative cross-sectional survey, we will examine perceived acceptability and feasibility in patients, peer-counselors, and healthcare providers involved in delivery of the intervention. In qualitative focus groups, we will analyze the implementation context and determine barriers and facilitators for implementation with different stakeholders (patients and/or representatives, peer-counselors, healthcare providers, health insurers). Based on these results, we will derive country-specific implementation strategies and develop a concrete implementation plan for each country.DiscussionThe intervention is expected to help patients adjust to their disease and improve their mental quality of life. The transdiagnostic and location-independent program has the potential to reach patients for psychosocial support who are usually hard to reach. By preparing the implementation in five countries, the project can help to make low-threshold psychosocial support available to many patients with rare diseases and improve comprehensive healthcare for an often neglected group.Trial registrationISRCTN15030282

Patient Assessment Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and its associations with quality of life among Swiss patients with systemic sclerosis: a mixed methods study

BackgroundThe Chronic Care Model (CCM) is a longstanding and widely adopted model guiding chronic illness management. Little is known about how CCM elements are implemented in rare disease care or how patients’ care experiences relate to health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We engaged patients living with systemic sclerosis (SSc) to assess current care according to the CCM from the patient perspective and their HRQoL.MethodsWe employed an explanatory sequential mixed methods design. First, we conducted a cross-sectional quantitative survey (n = 101) using the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and Systemic Sclerosis Quality of Life (SScQoL) questionnaires. Next, we used data from individual patient interviews (n = 4) and one patient focus group (n = 4) to further explore care experiences of people living with SSc with a focus on the PACIC dimensions.ResultsThe mean overall PACIC score was 3.0/5.0 (95% CI 2.8–3.2, n = 100), indicating care was ‘never’ to ‘generally not’ aligned with the CCM. Lowest PACIC subscale scores related to ‘goal setting/tailoring’ (mean = 2.5, 95% CI 2.2–2.7) and ‘problem solving/contextual counselling’ (mean = 2.9, 95% CI 2.7–3.2). No significant correlations were identified between the mean PACIC and SScQoL scores. Interviews revealed patients frequently encounter major shortcomings in care including ‘experiencing organized care with limited participation’, ‘not knowing which strategies are effective or harmful’ and ‘feeling left alone with disease and psychosocial consequences’. Patients often responded to challenges by ‘dealing with the illness in tailored measure’, ‘taking over complex coordination of care’ and ‘relying on an accessible and trustworthy team’.ConclusionsThe low PACIC mean overall score is comparable to findings in patients with common chronic diseases. Key elements of the CCM have yet to be systematically implemented in Swiss SSc management. Identified gaps in care related to lack of shared decision-making, goal-setting and individual counselling-aspects that are essential for supporting patient self-management skills. Furthermore, there appears to be a lack of complex care coordination tailored to individual patient needs.

Navigating the Complexity of Rare Diseases: Challenges, Innovations, and Future Directions

Rare diseases, often referred to as orphan diseases, comprise a diverse group of conditions affecting millions globally. Despite their individual rarity, these diseases collectively pose significant challenges to patients, healthcare systems, and society. The journey to diagnose and treat rare diseases is fraught with obstacles, including limited awareness among healthcare providers, scarcity of diagnostic resources, and formidable challenges in developing effective treatments due to small patient populations and regulatory hurdles. However, recent advancements in genomics, precision medicine, and innovative research methodologies have sparked hope for improved diagnosis, treatment, and care for those affected. This manuscript delves into the multifaceted landscape of rare diseases, highlighting the challenges patients face from diagnosis to treatment and the impact of these conditions on their lives. We explore and highlight the innovations and advancements that offer new hope, promising therapies, and the collaborative efforts propelling the field forward. Additionally, we address the ethical, social, and policy considerations integral to rare disease management, emphasizing the need for inclusivity, equity, and patient-centered care. In summary, addressing the challenges of rare diseases requires a concerted effort from all stakeholders, including researchers, healthcare providers, policymakers, patients, and advocacy groups. By embracing a comprehensive and collaborative approach, we can pave the way for significant advancements in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of rare diseases, ultimately improving outcomes and quality of life for affected individuals and their families.