General Practice Care Research Articles

Exploring practice staffs' perspectives regarding professional roles, confidence, and motivations in delivering mental health care within rural general practice: a qualitative exploration.

General practice is pivotal in delivering mental health care within communities, yet the attitudes and professional factors influencing this provision remain underexplored. This study seeks to understand the perspective of general practice staff around the professional factors that influence the provision of primary mental health care. A qualitative study was conducted with semi-structured interviews of 14 general practice staff involved in mental health care. Participants included receptionists (n = 3), nurses (n = 4), practice managers (n = 3), and general practitioners (n = 4), recruited via purposive sampling. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) guided the interviews, and thematic analysis was used to identify themes and subthemes. Three themes were identified. The first, 'Role identity, skills, and leadership in mental health care,' included subthemes of distinct role recognition with overlap, essential relational and practical skills, and leadership valued among experienced GPs. The second theme, 'Confidence and involvement in mental health care,' covered variability in confidence levels, differing perceptions of involvement, and attitudes towards further involvement. The third theme, 'Drivers for and outcomes of delivering mental health care,' revealed intrinsic motivations and acknowledged both benefits and serious consequences. This study explored general practice staff beliefs about role identity, skills, leadership, confidence, involvement, motivations, and perceptions of benefits in mental health care provision. The findings offer valuable insights into the complexities of mental health care in general practice, with significant implications for practice management and healthcare policy development.

Patient, financial and environmental impacts of a Medicines Optimisation in Care Homes (MOCH) service on polypharmacy following structured medication reviews

Abstract Introduction An NHS community trust was commissioned in February 2023 to deliver a MOCH service to about 15,000 care home residents across an Integrated Care System (ICS). Pharmacists in the MOCH service undertake Structured Medication Reviews (SMRs) to reduce inappropriate polypharmacy, working closely with care homes, General Practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacies. Pharmacy technicians undertake medication reviews to reduce low clinical value medicines. A patient-centred approach means medicines are stopped or changed following shared-decision making with the resident, carer or family. Aim To find out the impact of the MOCH service on reducing inappropriate polypharmacy, reducing medicines-related harm for residents, and to report financial savings and the environmental impact through reduction of CO2 emissions. Methods This service evaluation was approved by the Trust. No ethics approval was required. Quarterly and 6- monthly data sets covering one week reported by the MOCH service in the financial year 2023/2024 were used. These data sets were extrapolated to a full year. This service reported the number of medicines stopped, started and changed over one week of each quarter for SMRs and, pharmacy technicians reported every six months. Cost savings were calculated using the drug tariff based on continued use of medicines for one year. Pharmacists reported reduction in harm from medicines every six months based on a health interventions risk assessment scoring tool, assessing how many residents had potentially avoided moderate to serious harm following a SMR. The carbon savings were calculated based on financial savings from medicines stopped or changed using the DEFRA SIC 2020 Greenhouse Gases emission factor 0.621(kgCO2e/£) for pharmaceuticals1. Results In the first year the MOCH service completed SMRs for 11,363 residents (75% of care home residents in the ICS). Around 20,000 medicines for residents were stopped (one to two medicines per resident). Pharmacists predicted moderate to high-risk harm from medicines was reduced in approximately 4,200 residents. The cost savings from medicines stopped or changed was approximately £2.8 million, which translated to carbon savings of 1,773,340 kgCO2e, the equivalent of removing 644 cars from the road for one year. Discussion and Conclusion Reducing inappropriate polypharmacy resulted in a reduction of treatment burden, potential harm to residents2 and financial savings. Social impacts include reducing workload for care homes, GPs and community pharmacies, ultimately increasing the capacity of this stretched workforce (less dispensing, reduced risk of error, shorter medicine rounds and more time for residents). The environmental impact goes beyond carbon savings from pharmaceuticals to include reduction in workload, consumables, delivery and cost of waste disposal and prevention of hospital admissions.3 The limitations of this evaluation are that data collected over one week and then extrapolated may not be representative of all the other weeks in terms of cost savings and reduction of harm to residents, however MOCH pharmacists undertake peer reviews of reduction in harms to mitigate this. Costs incurred in making the financial savings were excluded. As the demographic of older people rises in the next 20 years a medication review is increasingly important to residents, the health economy, workforce, and our environment.

How Clinician-Scientists Access and Mobilise Social Capital and Thus Contribute to the Professional Development of Their Colleagues in Their Networks

ABSTRACT Clinician-scientists, physicians who conduct research, may fulfil a bridging role in networks of health care researchers and practitioners. Within clinician-scientists’ networks, knowledge sharing is thought to play a vital role in the continuing professional development of themselves and their colleagues. However, little is known about networks of clinician-scientists and how this impacts continuing professional development. Rooted in social capital theory, this study provides a mixed methods exploration of clinician-scientists’ networks. Ego-level social network data were collected via semi-structured interviews on professional interactions about evidence-based practice with 15 clinician-scientists in the area of general practice and elderly care. Quantitative analysis revealed that professional networks of clinician-scientists varied in size, composition, and frequency of interactions depending on appointed research time and experience. Less experienced clinician-scientists interacted most frequently with other clinician-scientists while experienced clinician-scientist experienced more sporadically with clinicians. Clinician-scientists with more research time interacted more frequently with scientists and had a slightly larger professional network than those with less research time. The thematic qualitative analysis revealed different decision-making processes of clinician-scientists on mobilising their social capital and connecting to others in the network: (1) deliberate decision about initiating connections; (2) reactive behaviour without a decision; (3) ad-hoc decision. Clinician-scientists exchange knowledge to enhance their own continuing professional development mainly but also contribute to the professional development of clinicians, scientists, and other clinician-scientists.

Updates in digital shared care: Launching into the 21st century.

The recent Intergenerational Report (2023) highlighted that the Australian healthcare system will face increasing economic and logistical challenges, with projected growth in health spending due to an ageing population and an increasing number of chronic diseases. Shared care, amodel emphasising collaboration between nursing andallied health, general practice and specialist care providers, has emerged as one solution. This paper explores the contemporary shared care landscape in Australia, highlighting the digital transformation of healthcare, the adoption of eHealth technologies, and their impact on improving patient carecoordination. The roles of shared electronic health records, secure electronic communication and consultation, electronic patient portals and telehealth in enhancing healthcare accessibility and management of chronic diseases are individually explored. Infrastructure for future inter-electronic medical record integrations are then discussed. Innovative care models combining novel technology and shared care hold promise for more efficient, patient‑centric healthcare systems. Given Australia's unique healthcare challenges, it provides the ideal environment to lead the way in the digital transformation of shared care.

Patients’ and professionals’ experiences with remote care during COVID-19: a qualitative study

Abstract Background There are concerns about access to remote care for patients from low-income neighborhoods, as their first point of contact in Dutch health care is the general practitioner (GP). Now that general practice professionals have returned to the pre-pandemic ways of health care delivery, this paper looks back at experiences with remote care during COVID-19. It investigates experiences of both patients and general practice professionals with the approachability and appropriateness of remote care, and their satisfaction. Methods In this qualitative study, interviews were conducted with 78 patients and 18 GPs, 7 nurse practitioners and 6 mental health professionals from general practices in low-income neighborhoods. Interviews took place by phone or in person in the native language of participants. Results Patients from low-income neighborhoods generally found remote care to be approachable, especially telephone consultation. In contrast, video calling was rarely used. Most patients thought remote care was possible for minor ailments but still wanted to see the doctor face-to-face regularly. Patients were generally satisfied with remote care at the time, but this did not necessarily reflect their willingness to continue using it in the future. Moreover, there was lack in consensus among general practice professionals on the appropriateness of remote care for certain physical and mental complaints. Nurse practitioners and mental health professionals had a negative attitude toward remote care. Conclusions Integrating remote care in general practices in low-income neighborhoods is not only important in times of crisis, but also for the future where care is becoming increasingly digitalized. To achieve full integration of remote care in general practices, it is important to take opinions and barriers of patients and providers into account. It is also recommended to create guidelines for reaching consensus on the cases in which remote care can be appropriately used. Key messages • Take opinions and barriers regarding remote care of GP patients and providers into account. • Create guidelines to reach consensus on the appropriate use of remote care for GP patients’ health problems.

Associations between general practice and outpatient care continuity in people with multimorbidity

Abstract Background Relational continuity in primary and secondary care is linked to better health outcomes for patients, but it is unclear whether metrics of continuity in each setting are associated. Our study examined the association between relational continuity in general practice (GP) and continuity of hospital outpatient specialties in people with clusters of multimorbidity. Methods We used GP records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, linked to Hospital Episode Statistics outpatient records. Included were patients ≥18 years, with two or more of 212 Long-Term Conditions (LTCs), registered throughout 2019 and with at least three GP and three outpatient appointments. The Continuity of Care Index (COCI) was calculated separately for visits to the same i) GP and ii) hospital specialty, where 0 represents no continuity and 1 represents all visits to the same GP or specialty. We assessed the association between the indices using univariable and multivariable fractional logit regression. We calculated expected COCI scores for each LTC and assessed variation in the COCI between LTCs assigned to one of 15 clusters of co-occurring diseases derived previously. A sensitivity analysis repeated analysis using the Sequential Continuity (SECON) score, which captures longitudinal continuity. Results Of 1,135,903 patients, 56.2% were ≥60 years. The median (IQR) COCI in GP was 0.22 (0.11-0.40) and in outpatients was 0.33 (0.20-0.52). Although statistically significant (p < 0.001) the relationship between the two measures was clinically insignificant in both univariable and multivariable models. No strong relationships were found between COCI scores and LTC clusters. Similar patterns were found using the SECON score. Conclusions We found no strong association between continuity of care in GP and outpatient settings, and no clear patterns with LTC clusters. This suggests that lack of continuity in secondary care is not compensated for by increased continuity of care in primary care. Key messages • We found no meaningful association between measures of continuity of care in general practice and hospital outpatient settings. • Our findings suggest that lack of continuity of outpatient care is not compensated for by increased continuity in primary care.

Future proof competencies for nurses working in primary care; a mixed methods study

Abstract Background Healthcare services, also those provided by nurses, are challenged by the increasing care demands of an ageing population and people with chronic conditions. To improve care efficiency and quality, now and in the future, nurses must have competencies regarding self-management support of patients, electronic communication, preventive care, and engaging relatives in care. This study aimed to assess primary care registered nurses’ (RNs) time allocation to these competencies and their perceived needs for further development of these competencies. Methods A mixed methods design was used, involving a nationwide survey (n = 303) and focus groups (12 participants), both with RNs working in community care services or general practitioners (GPs) practices. Survey data were analysed descriptively, and focus group transcripts underwent qualitative thematic analysis. Results The majority of RNs invest significant time in client self-management support (90%), preventive care (82%), and involving relatives in care (74%). RNs also recognized an increasing demand for these competencies in the future and the need to motivate patients and relatives to self-manage their health. Furthermore, RNs reported that competencies regarding electronic communication skills will become extra important in the future, yet currently only 37% dedicate substantial time to this. RNs face challenges in effectively utilizing electronic communication with patients and thus need opportunities to improve digital skills. Additionally, RNs desire enhanced collaboration with other healthcare professionals, such as GPs and medical specialists. Conclusions RNs’ limited time allocation and perceived inadequacy in electronic patient communication, underscore the importance of targeted training in this area, and prioritizing this by healthcare organizations. In addition, fostering collaboration between nursing staff and other healthcare professionals could support future proof nursing in primary care. Key messages • Nurses demonstrate resilience in addressing healthcare challenges, emphasizing client care, prevention and family engagement. • Training nurses in competencies for electronic communication with patients is essential to meet the anticipated increase in demand for this aspect in their practice.

Impact of time and COVID-19 pandemic on GP mental health consultations in deprived neighborhoods

Abstract Background The stringent lockdown measures and limited physical access to GP care at the start of COVID-19 pandemic resulted into a decrease of mental health consultations. It raised concerns about the access of patients with mental health problems. The aim of this study is to investigate the mental health GP consultations amongst patients from deprived neighborhoods before and during COVID-19 pandemic, especially after the stringent lockdown in the Netherlands. Methods In an observational study (2018-2022), medical data of 360,645 patients were analyzed for the proportions of mental health consultations (segmented per month) by comparing the lockdown phase (March 2020-May 2020) and post-lockdown phase (June 2020-June 2022) with the pre-pandemic period the patients living in deprived and non-deprived neighborhoods. Results Analyzing a total of 759,863 mental health consultations showed that during the lockdown phase of COVID-19, less mental health problem consultations were observed than pre-pandemic. This decrease was not significant for patients from deprived neighborhoods, but the decrease was significant for patients from non-deprived neighborhoods, RR = 0.990; 95%CI=0.934-1.051 and RR = 0.918; 95%CI=0.885-0.953 respectively. Conversely, the number of post-lockdown phase consultations for patients in deprived neighborhoods was significantly increased compared to pre-pandemic levels (RR = 1.074;95%CI=1.002-1.152), but not for patients in non-deprived neighborhoods (RR = 1.000; 95%CI=0.959-1.043). This increase in post-lockdown phase consultations in deprived neighborhoods can be explained by the higher frequency of consultations per patient. Conclusions Consistently over time, demand for GP mental health care was and remains higher among patients from deprived neighborhoods, with an increase in post-lockdown consultations. Sufficient access to primary health care should be guaranteed to ensure treatment of mental health problems for social-economic disadvantaged groups. Key messages • Socioeconomic status has a negative sustainable impact on demand for mental health consultations in deprived neighbourhoods. • To ensure the treatment of mental health problems for social-economic disadvantaged groups, sufficient access to the primary health care should be guaranteed at all times.

Barriers and facilitators to culturally sensitive care in general practice: a reflexive thematic analysis

BackgroundThis study investigated the perceived barriers and potential facilitators for culturally sensitive care among general practitioners in Flanders. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for improving healthcare quality and equity.MethodologyTwenty-one in-depth interviews were conducted with Flemish GPs. Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis was employed to develop and interpret themes that elucidate shared underlying meanings and capture the nuanced challenges and strategies related to cultural sensitivity in healthcare.ResultsTwo core themes were generated: GPs’ uncertainty and opposition. These themes manifest in emotional responses such as frustration, miscomprehension, and feelings of helplessness, influencing relational outcomes marked by patient disconnect and reduced motivation for cultural sensitivity. The barriers identified are exacerbated by resource scarcity and limited intercultural contact. Conversely, facilitators include structural elements like interpreters and individual strategies such as engagement, aimed at enhancing GPs’ confidence in culturally diverse encounters. A meta-theme of perceived lack of control underscores the challenges, particularly regarding language barriers and resource constraints, highlighting the critical role of GPs’ empowerment through enhanced intercultural communication skills.ConclusionAddressing GPs’ uncertainties and oppositions can mitigate related issues, thereby promoting comprehensive culturally sensitive care. Essential strategies include continuous education and policy reforms to dismantle structural barriers. Moreover, incentivizing culturally sensitive care through quality care financial incentives could bolster GP motivation. These insights are pivotal for stakeholders—practitioners, policymakers, and educators—committed to advancing culturally sensitive healthcare practices and, ultimately, for fostering more equitable care provision.

Physiotherapists working with pessaries

Pessaries and the physiotherapy profession have evolved over the past 10 years, and pelvic health physiotherapists can now prescribe vaginal pessaries. Pelvic, Obstetric and Gynaecological Physiotherapy (POGP) is developing ways to support members with these skills. Globally, up to 50% of women will suffer from pelvic organ prolapse (POP) (Carroll et al. 2022), and this condition costs the UK National Health Service £45 million every year (PCWHF 2019). The most common symptom is a vaginal bulge. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines recommend either doing nothing, or pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFMEs), vaginal pessaries or surgery (NICE 2019). Pessary services are provided in dedicated clinics, usually in general practice or secondary care. There has been an increase in physiotherapists delivering pessary care over the past decade: in 2013, it was reported that 1.4% were part of the pessary workforce compared to 5% in 2020 (Bugge et al. 2013; Brown et al. 2021). Currently, ineffective patient pathways, poor service provision and lack of training are barriers to treatment. Poorly designed patient pathways are frustrating, and women are often required to return to primary or secondary care to get a referral to a pessary clinic. Physiotherapists are well placed to offer a pessary alongside PFMEs since it is part of the range of conservative treatment options. They also build strong a rapport with their patients because of the therapeutic nature of the treatment sessions, and typically, offer longer appointments than postnatal period. A prospective multicentre trial demonstrated the acceptability of and compliance with using a pessary immediately after childbirth irrespective of any pelvic floor dysfunction or mode of delivery (Baessler et al. 2019). The majority of women used the pessary to treat the symptoms of POP. Further work is required to investigate pessary use and the prevention of pelvic floor dysfunction in this cohort of women. The results of the TOPSY [Treatment Of Prolapse with Self-care pessarY] trial (Hagen et al. 2023) highlighted that pessary self-management is cost-effective and reduces complications. This is excellent news because physiotherapists are well placed to teach women pessary self-management because of: generally longer appointments; and the well-established rapport built up over time while teaching PFMEs. Despite women reporting that pessary use during exercise relieves their symptoms, this is an under-researched area. The impact of exercise on POP, and whether there are any protective factors involved that prevent its progression, are not fully understood. There also remains a gap in the evidence with regard to the use of PFMEs and vaginal pessaries. Research proposals are currently in development to address this. A pessary course is being developed by POGP, and this will be launched in 2024 alongside a mentoring programme as part of the pessary accreditation scheme jointly written with the United Kingdom Continence Society. Further governance documents have been created by the Physiotherapists Working with Pessaries subgroup of POGP, including a standard operating procedure, emergency out-of-hours statement, note proformas and template letters (POGP 2024).

Prospective long-term follow-up after grommet insertion: Hearing and functional health outcomes in children

ObjectivesTo assess hearing levels and functional health outcomes of children two years after routine grommet surgery with standard care follow-up (discharge to General Practitioner (GP) care or Ear Nose and Throat (ENT) clinic appointment at 4–8 weeks). MethodsProspective cohort study of 89 children (average age of 7.98 years) recalled for audiological assessment 2 years after grommet surgery in a large ENT outpatient service in South Auckland, New Zealand. Functional health was assessed using parent-reported responses to the OMQ20 questionnaire. Results46 (51.7 %) children had hearing loss in at least one ear with 28 (31.5 %) children having bilateral hearing loss. Māori children had statistically higher odds compared to non-Māori children (odds ratio 5.491, p = .003) to have bilateral hearing loss after controlling for age, household deprivation, gender, season, and mode of follow-up. Most parents reported concerns with their child's hearing, speech, attention-seeking behaviours, and nasal symptoms, but not ear problems. Bilateral hearing loss (p < .001) was found to significantly predict functional health status (total OMQ20 score). ConclusionsThe high prevalence of hearing loss and functional health concerns suggest that the standard follow-up care is not adequately managing children after routine grommet insertion. Māori children are disproportionately impacted, and post-grommet follow-up schedules must consider individualised approaches to address these inequities in outcomes.

Care gaps among people presenting to the hospital following self-harm: observational study of three emergency departments in England

ObjectivesThis study aims to examine the proportions of patients referred to mental health, social and voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE) services and general practice and to assess care gaps...

Incidence of Graves' Disease with Validation and Completeness of the Diagnosis for Registry Extracts in the Danish National Patient Register.

Graves' disease (GD) is one of the most common causes of thyrotoxicosis. It has been proposed to identify incident GD by using the GD-specific code, E05.0, of the 10th revision of the International Classification of Disease (ICD-10) in the Danish National Patient Register (DNPR). We aimed to report the incidence of GD and to investigate the validity and completeness of E05.0 registration using Aalborg University Hospital (AaUH) as a single centre-sample. The study included registry data from 2020 to 2022. The study population (n=2,893) comprised all people (15-99 years) in the catchment area of AaUH (n=244,872) with either positive anti-thyroid stimulating hormone receptor antibodies (TRAb), or registered with a thyroid disease related ICD-10 code E03.0-E07.9, O99.2 or O90.5 at the Department of Endocrinology, AaUH. To identify incident cases, all subjects occurring for the first time in 2020 were excluded (n=2,339). The incident subjects were categorized into a general practice (n=63) or hospital care group (n=491) and underwent GD verification by biochemical tests and thyroid imaging. Validity was evaluated by positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values and completeness of E05.0 registration was estimated to the total number of verified GD subjects in hospital care only and in overall (groups combined). One hundred thirty-one incident GD subjects were identified corresponding to an incidence of 26.8 per 100,000/year. E05.0had a PPV of 90% [95% CI: 81;96] and a NPV of 90% [95% CI: 85;93] to identify incident cases of GD. Completeness was estimated to be 73% [95% CI: 63;82] in hospital care and 50-60% [95% CI: 41;68] in overall. We report on a similar incidence of GD as previous studies in Denmark. Despite a high PPV, incident cases of GD could not adequately be identified by E05.0 in DNPR due to low completeness. Researchers should rely on biochemical test results to identify incident GD.

Exploring the User Acceptability and Feasibility of a Clinical Decision Support Tool Designed to Facilitate Timely Diagnosis of New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes in Children: Qualitative Interview Study Among General Practitioners.

Up to half of the children with new-onset type 1 diabetes present to the hospital with diabetic ketoacidosis, a life-threatening condition that can develop because of diagnostic delay. Three-quarters of Australian children visit their general practitioner (GP) the week before presenting to the hospital with diabetic ketoacidosis. Our prototype, DIRECT-T1DM (Decision-Support for Integrated, Real-Time Evaluation and Clinical Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus), is an electronic clinical decision support tool that promotes immediate point-of-care testing in general practice to confirm the suspicion of diabetes. This avoids laboratory testing, which has been documented internationally as a cause of diagnostic delay. In this investigation, we aimed to pilot and assess the feasibility and acceptability of our prototype to GP end users. We also explored the challenges of diagnosing type 1 diabetes in the Australian general practice context. In total, 4 GPs, a pediatric endocrinologist, and a PhD candidate were involved in conceptualizing the DIRECT-T1DM prototype, which was developed at the Department of General Practice and Primary Care at the University of Melbourne. Furthermore, 6 GPs were recruited via convenience sampling to evaluate the tool. The study involved 3 phases: a presimulation interview, simulated clinical scenarios, and a postsimulation interview. The interview guide was developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as a guide. All phases of the study were video, audio, and screen recorded. Audio recordings were transcribed by the investigating team. Analysis was carried out using CFIR as the underlying framework. Major themes were identified among three domains and 7 constructs of the CFIR: (1) outer setting-time pressure, difficulty in diagnosing pediatric type 1 diabetes, and secondary care considerations influenced GPs' needs regarding DIRECT-T1DM; (2) inner setting-DIRECT-T1DM fits within existing workflows, it has a high relative priority due to its importance in patient safety, and GPs exhibited high tension for change; and (3) innovation-design recommendations included altering coloring to reflect urgency, font style and bolding, specific language, information and guidelines, and inclusion of patient information sheets. End-user acceptability of DIRECT-T1DM was high. This was largely due to its implications for patient safety and its "real-time" nature. DIRECT-T1DM may assist in appropriate management of children with new-onset diabetes, which is an uncommon event in general practice, through safety netting.

Regional socioeconomic characteristics and density of general practitioners in Germany: A nationwide cross-sectional and longitudinal spatial analysis

ObjectivesLimited healthcare availability impacts population health. Regional disparities in GP density across Germany raise questions about their association with regional socioeconomic characteristics. Study designThis longitudinal nationwide ecological German study used regional data at the county level (n = 401) from 2015 to 2019 provided by the Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development (BBSR). The outcome was general practitioners (GPs) density, defined as the number of GPs per 10,000 inhabitants. MethodsUnivariate Moran's I, cluster analysis (LISA), and spatial lag of X (SLX) models were employed to analyse the spatial distribution of GP density and its correlation with various regional socioeconomic characteristics from a cross-sectional and longitudinal perspective. ResultsIn contrast to the univariate analysis, rural counties showed the highest GP density the multivariate model. Several counties were identified as embedded in low- or high-GP-density clusters. In 2015 and 2019, larger household size (2015: std. β = −2.31, p = 0.021; 2019: std. β = −4.14, p < 0.001) and higher unemployment rate (2015: std. β = −2.84, p = 0.005; 2019: std. β = −5.47, p < 0.001) were associated with lower GP density. In the longitudinal model, a greater increase in the unemployment rate was related to a greater decrease in GP density (std. β = −2.17, p = 0.030). ConclusionA higher regional unemployment rate is linked to lower GP availability in Germany, and a greater increase in the unemployment rate was related to a greater decrease in GP availability over time. This necessitates policy intervention to avoid socioeconomic disparities in GP care.

Health care utilization up to 11years after diagnosis among patients with a hematologic malignancy and its association with socioeconomic position.

To investigate health care utilization among patients with hematologic malignancies and its association with socioeconomic position (SEP) and compare health care utilization with a cancer-free population. Patients with aggressive lymphoma, indolent lymphoma, or multiple myeloma (MM), diagnosed between 1999-2010 and 2015-2019, participated in longitudinal patient-reported outcome research, up to 11years post-diagnosis. Questionnaires assessed health care utilization at the general practitioner (GP), medical specialist, and additional health care. SEP was based on education and income, categorized as low, medium, or high. Sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Mixed models and logistic regression analyses were performed. The study included 2319 patients (71% response rate), who completed on average five measurements. Patients with MM reported the highest health care utilization, both at the GP and medical specialist. Low SEP was associated with higher utilization at the GP (medium education β = - 0.72, p = 0.01; high education β = - 1.15, p < 0.001) and lower utilization of additional physical (OR = 1.7, p = 0.01) and psychosocial (OR = 1.5, p < 0.05) care, among all patients. For patients with MM, high SEP was also associated with higher utilization of health care at the medical specialist (high education β = 2.56, p < 0.05). Hematologic malignancy-related and SEP-related disparities in health care utilization were observed. To ensure equal access to health consumption, attention is needed for patients with a low SEP to provide better guidance in their cancer (survivorship) care. Improving health literacy and involving informal caregivers and nurse-led patient navigation may help reduce disparities in access to (additional) health care.

Emergency admission predictive risk stratification models: assessment of implementation consequences (PRISMATIC 2): protocol for a mixed methods study.

Emergency admissions are costly, increasingly numerous, and associated with adverse patient outcomes. Policy responses have included the widespread introduction of emergency admission risk stratification (EARS) tools in primary care. These tools generate scores that predict patients' risk of emergency hospital admission and can be used to support targeted approaches to improve care and reduce admissions. However, the impact of EARS is poorly understood and there may be unintended consequences. To assess effects, mechanisms, costs, and patient and healthcare professionals' views related to the introduction of EARS tools in England. Quasi-experimental mixed methods design using anonymised routine data and qualitative methods. We will apply multiple interrupted time series analysis to data, aggregated at former Clinical Commissioning Group level, to look at changes in emergency admission and other healthcare use following EARS introduction across England. We will investigate GP decision-making at practice level using linked general practice and secondary care data to compare case-mix, demographics, indicators of condition severity and frailty associated with emergency admissions before and after EARS introduction. We will undertake interviews (n~48) with GPs and healthcare staff to understand how patient care may have changed. We will conduct focus groups (n=2) and interviews (n~16) with patients to explore how they perceive that communication of individual risk scores might affect their experiences and health seeking behaviours. Findings will provide policymakers, healthcare professionals, and patients, with a better understanding of the effects, costs and stakeholder perspectives related to the introduction of EARS tools.

A game of snakes and ladders: the world of complex health and social care data linkage

Objective and ApproachResearch on social care services requires large, comprehensive, routine datasets. Launched in November 2019, Developing resources And minimum data set for Care Homes’ Adoption (DACHA) study aims to develop a prototype minimum dataset as proof of concept and to propose implementation. We describe our experience since 2021 of identifying, applying for, and linking care home, local, integrated care system (ICS) and national datasets, including direct-care software-provider data, GP and NHS England (NHSE) datasets. ResultsOur key challenges: Risk aversion and fragmented information governance within and between organisations. Complex information governance structures must be understood before participants are recruited. Shifts in the data landscape: data ownership moved from clinical commissioning groups to ICSs; NHSE merged with NHS Digital. Research funding: research is required of ICSs, but it is not a system priority, so processes and funding aren’t in place, and research burdens an already strained system. Our key lessons: Formalising agreements early on and obtaining, and maintaining, senior, committed buy-in. Studies should value the data sharing process through the inclusion of data controllers and information governance staff in the system in research project budgets. The facilitation of GP and social care data collection nationally must be balanced with its administrative burden. ImplicationsThe DACHA study overlapped with the COVID-19 pandemic and could only engage a limited number (n=3) of ICSs within project resources. Nevertheless, the complexity of the system and the plurality of actors delay or even block legitimate research interests.

General practitioners' views and experiences of postpartum contraception counselling and provision: a qualitative-descriptive study.

To explore Australian general practitioners' views and experiences of undertaking postpartum contraception counselling and provision during the 6-8-week postnatal check. Qualitative-descriptive study; semi-structured online interviews. General practitioners who provide postnatal care in Australian primary health care, recruited using purposive, convenience, and snowball methods, 16 June - 6 July 2023. Views and experiences of postpartum contraception counselling and provision. Twenty-three general practitioners from six states were interviewed; the mean interview time was 30 minutes (range, 21-47 minutes), twenty-two participants were women, and twenty-one worked in metropolitan areas. All participants provide postnatal checks and had the training and facilities needed for providing contraceptive implant insertions. Twelve participants had training in intrauterine device (IUD) insertion, and twenty-one worked in practices with facilities for IUD insertions. Three themes were constructed: views and preferences regarding postnatal contraception counselling; postpartum provision of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC); and opportunities for improving postpartum contraception care in general practice. While most participants recommended LARC methods at postnatal checks, only twelve were trained to insert IUDs. Time constraints, limited access to training, limited financial support, and the lack of guidelines for postnatal checks and contraception care were seen as impeding postpartum contraception counselling. Participants highlighted the importance of access to education and training, appropriate remuneration for general practitioners, multidisciplinary collaboration among health professionals, the inclusion of practice nurses, and raising awareness among mothers of the importance of postnatal checks and postpartum contraception care. General practitioners are well placed to facilitate discussions about contraception with women who have recently given birth. Postpartum contraception care in general practice could be improved by better access to contraception training, appropriate remuneration for contraception procedures, greater multidisciplinary collaboration, and national postnatal check and postpartum contraception guidelines.

How does the role of complementary and alternative medicine in general practice differ between countries? Interviews with doctors who have worked both in Germany and elsewhere in Europe

BackgroundAvailable data suggest that general practitioners (GPs) in Germany use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) modalities more frequently than GPs in many other countries. We investigated the country differences perceived by general practitioners who have worked in Germany and in one of four other European countries with regard to the role of complementary and alternative treatments in primary care.MethodsIn this qualitative study we conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 GPs who had worked both in Germany and Italy, the Netherlands, Norway or the United Kingdom (UK; n = 3 for each of the four countries). Participants were asked how they perceived and experienced country differences regarding health system, relevance of CAM modalities, the role of evidence-based medicine (EBM) and science, and how they handle so-called indeterminate situations. For the analysis, we followed a thematic analysis approach according to Braun and Clarke with focus on themes that cover CAM.ResultsParticipants unanimously reported that they perceived CAM to be more relevant in general practice in Germany compared to the other countries. We identified four overarching themes in relation to the perceived reasons for these differences. Firstly, physicians with experiences in countries with a strong EBM and science orientation (Netherlands, Norway and the UK) considered the deeply ingrained view in national healthcare systems and GP communities that CAM modalities are not evidence-based as the main reason for the lower use of CAM by GPs. Secondly, extensive training of communication skills was cited as a reason that reduced the need for CAM in the Netherlands, Norway and the UK. Thirdly, differences in patient expectations and demands were perceived as a factor contributing to greater utilisation of CAM by German GPs compared to the other countries. Finally, country-specific reimbursement mechanisms were considered as a factor influencing the role of CAM in general practice.ConclusionsThe study results point to major differences between countries with regard to the role of CAM in GP care. Differences in basic attitudes in the discipline of general practice, patient expectations and system conditions appear to play an important role here.