Multimorbidity Care Research Articles

Multimorbidity and Person-Centred care in a socioeconomically deprived community: a qualitative study.

Multimorbidity (>2 long-term conditions) has poorer outcomes in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation (SED). High-quality Person-Centred Care (PCC) is important in multimorbidity but socially vulnerable populations have not informed current PCC models. To explore how wider community factors influence management of multimorbidity in the context of high SED, how high-quality PCC is defined by patients, and whether this influences healthcare management. Ethnographically informed case study in community experiencing high SED in Scotland. Participant observation (hours = 142) within 4 community groups who also took part in 2 participatory workshops. 25 in-depth interviews with people with multimorbidity, recruited from local General Practices; emerging findings discussed with interviewees in one focus group. Field notes/transcripts analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Key aspects of PCC were "patient as person", "therapeutic relationship", "co-ordination" and "power-sharing"; power sharing was particularly enabling but rarely happened (barriers often unseen by practitioners). Shared community experiences of "being known", "stigma" and "none of the systems working" influenced how people approached health services, and healthcare decisions. High quality PCC may have been particularly effective in this setting because of its influence on ameliorating wider shared negative community experiences. In a high SED setting PCC is important and can enhance engagement. Wider community factors have a critical influence on engagement with healthcare in areas of high SED and PCC may be particularly important in this context because of its influence ameliorating these. Policy makers should prioritise and resource PCC.

Avoidable Hospitalizations in Frail Older Adults: The Role of Sociodemographic, Clinical, and Care-Related Factors

ObjectivesThis study aims to investigate the relationship between frailty and avoidable hospitalization risk, and the moderating role of sociodemographic, clinical, and care-related factors. DesignLongitudinal population-based cohort study. Setting and ParticipantsA total of 3168 community-dwelling individuals, aged ≥60 years, from the Swedish National study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen (SNAC-K). MethodsWe operationalized physical frailty using baseline SNAC-K data (2001-2004). In line with the Swedish Board of Health and Welfare and Association of Local Authorities and Regions, avoidable hospitalizations were considered those that could have been prevented through proper and timely outpatient care and identified through the Swedish National Patient Register. Participants were followed from baseline until first avoidable hospitalization, death, drop out, institutionalization, or maximum 12 (median 7.6) years. The association between frailty and avoidable hospitalization was explored through flexible parametric survival models, with stratified analyses to investigate age, gender, education, civil status, multimorbidity, cognitive status, and informal and formal care as potential modifiers. ResultsThe adjusted 12-year cumulative incidence of avoidable hospitalization was significantly higher for frail persons (cumulative incidence 33.2%, 95% CI 28.9%-38.1%) than for prefrail (cumulative incidence 26.6%, 95% CI 24.5%-29.0%) and nonfrail (cumulative incidence 25.2%, 95% CI 22.5%-28.3%) individuals. In addition, prefrailty [hazard ratio (HR) 1.21, 95% CI 1.00-1.45] and frailty (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.47-2.50) were associated with increased avoidable hospitalization hazards. Furthermore, the association between frailty and avoidable hospitalization was stronger in older adults aged <78 years (HR 3.12, 95% CI 1.99-4.91) and those with relatively fewer chronic diseases (HR 3.88, 95% CI 1.95-7.72), whereas provision of formal social care (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.77-1.72) seemed to act as a buffer. Conclusions and ImplicationsOur results indicate that older community-dwelling adults with prefrailty and frailty are at increased risk of experiencing avoidable hospitalizations, highlighting a need for better care of these individuals at the outpatient level. Formal social care services and close monitoring of particularly vulnerable subgroups of frail persons may mitigate this risk.

Data linkage studies of primary care utilisation after release from prison: a scoping review

BackgroundPrimary care plays a central role in most, if not all, health care systems including the care of vulnerable populations such as people who have been incarcerated. Studies linking incarceration records to health care data can improve understanding about health care access following release from prison. This review maps evidence from data-linkage studies about primary care use after prison release.MethodsThe framework by Arksey and O’Malley and guidance by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) were used in this review. This scoping review followed methods published in a study protocol. Searches were performed (January 2012-March 2023) in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science Core Collection using key-terms relating to two areas: (i) people who have been incarcerated and (ii) primary care. Using eligibility criteria, two authors independently screened publication titles and abstracts (step 1), and subsequently, screened full text publications (step 2). Discrepancies were resolved with a third author. Two authors independently charted data from included publications. Findings were mapped by methodology, key findings and gaps in research.ResultsThe database searches generated 1,050 publications which were screened by title and abstract. Following this, publications were fully screened (n = 63 reviewer 1 and n = 87 reviewer 2), leading to the inclusion of 17 publications. Among the included studies, primary care use after prison release was variable. Early contact with primary care services after prison release (e.g. first month) was positively associated with an increased health service use, but an investigation found that a large proportion of individuals did not access primary care during the first month. The quality of care was found to be largely inadequate (measured continuity of care) for moderate multimorbidity. There were lower levels of colorectal and breast cancer screening among people released from custody. The review identified studies of enhanced primary care programmes for individuals following release from prison, with studies reporting a reduction in reincarceration and criminal justice system costs.ConclusionsThis review has suggested mixed evidence regarding primary care use after prison release and has highlighted challenges and areas of suboptimal care. Further research has been discussed in relation to the scoping review findings.

Racial inequalities in the development of multimorbidity of chronic conditions: results from a Brazilian prospective cohort

BackgroundThe occurrence of multimorbidity and its impacts have differentially affected population subgroups. Evidence on its incidence has mainly come from high-income regions, with limited exploration of racial disparities. This study investigated the association between racial groups and the development of multimorbidity and chronic conditions in the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil).MethodsData from self-reported white, brown (pardos or mixed-race), and black participants at baseline of ELSA-Brasil (2008–2010) who were at risk for multimorbidity were analysed. The development of chronic conditions was assessed through in-person visits and self-reported diagnosis via telephone until the third follow-up visit (2017–2019). Multimorbidity was defined when, at the follow-up visit, the participant had two or more morbidities. Cumulative incidences, incidence rates, and adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were estimated using Poisson models.ResultsOver an 8.3-year follow-up, compared to white participants: browns had a 27% greater incidence of hypertension and obesity; and blacks had a 62% and 45% greater incidence, respectively. Blacks also had 58% more diabetes. The cancer incidence was greater among whites. Multimorbidity affected 41% of the participants, with a crude incidence rate of 57.5 cases per 1000 person-years (ranging from 56.3 for whites to 63.9 for blacks). Adjusted estimates showed a 20% higher incidence of multimorbidity in black participants compared to white participants (IRR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.05–1.38).ConclusionsSignificant racial disparities in the risk of chronic conditions and multimorbidity were observed. Many associations revealed a gradient increase in illness risk according to darker skin tones. Addressing fundamental causes such as racism and racial discrimination, alongside considering social determinants of health, is vital for comprehensive multimorbidity care. Intersectoral, equitable policies are essential for ensuring health rights for historically marginalized groups.

The impact of cardiac rehabilitation on atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation: results of a retrospective study

Abstract Background Although pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an extensively utilized atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment, many patients still experience AF recurrences. Multimorbidity care, including physical activity, may reduce recurrences. In Belgium, patients undergoing an ablation are entitled to a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program after PVI, but not all do participate. More evidence that such (standardized) CR programs for AF patients after ablation can positively impact rhythm control is desirable. Purpose This study retrospectively investigated the impact of CR on AF recurrence after PVI. Methods We analysed an extensive database of a large Belgian tertiary care center with patients who underwent a primary PVI between 2007 and 2020 and who had a follow-up of at least 1 year. General cardiology follow-up included a 24h Holter monitoring 3 and 12 months after PVI. Patients were retrospectively divided into an intervention and control group based on their choice to participate in a standardized CR program. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the time-to-recurrence and event-free survival curves after the primary ablation. Differences between curves were tested with the log-rank test. Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze continuous variables and the Chi-square test for categorical variables. Results In total, 1767 patients were included, of which 589 participated to CR and 1178 served as controls (median 64 (56-70) y, 68.9% male, median BMI 27.5 (24.7-30.7) kg/m2). There was no significant difference between CR and controls in median age (64y vs. 63y respectively; p=0.203), the proportion of male (57.9% vs. 47.0% respectively; p=0.111) and the proportion of paroxysmal AF (66.4% vs. 70.6% respectively; p=0.210). The proportion with recurrent AF at the end of study follow-up (with a three-month initial blanking period) in the CR and control group was similar (32.6% vs. 35.1% respectively; p=0.288), and also survival analysis demonstrated no significant difference (p=0.827; Figure 1). We noted a cross-over of the recurrence curves after about 1500 days, but the rate of AF recurrence was not different among CR and controls within the first year post-ablation (p=0.136) nor when analysed from day 365 until the end of the study (p=0.341) (Figure 2). There was no significant difference in AF recurrences between CR and controls for either paroxysmal AF (p= 0.551) or persistent AF (p=0.181) based on the survival analysis. Conclusions This retrospective analysis could not demonstrate reduced AF recurrence in post-PVI patients following a structured CR program. The unexpected crossover of curves could point to earlier AF detection in CR patients, while there might be long-term benefit of physical activity. Multivariable analysis will have to evaluate whether impact of CR is related to certain clinical patient characteristics, which might also have contributed to inclusion bias.Figure 1Figure 2

#3144 Improving care for patients on maintenance haemodialysis effectiveness: a novel multidisciplinary approach

Abstract Background and Aims Care for patients receiving maintenance haemodialysis (MH) is critically dependent on multi-professional coordination of care for multimorbidity and complex care needs. Design and coordination of care models is an important clinical concern (Kharbanda et al., 2020). We developed the Biannual Comprehensive Haemodialysis Multidisciplinary Team meeting (BCHMDT), a weekly meeting in which patients receiving MH are reviewed biannually. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the BCHMDT in improving the provision of care for patients receiving MH. Method This single-centre retrospective study collected data from documentation from 146 patient encounters with the BCHMDT during from two separate time periods: August-December 2020, when the meeting had just been introduced (63 patient encounters) and February to July 2022 (83 patient encounters). Meetings involved a renal physician, haemodialysis specialist nurse, renal dietician, dialysis access nurse specialist, renal transplant coordinator, renal counsellor, and palliative care physician. Meetings were structured around a specially designed proforma Fig. 1. Results Actions generated by the MDT included investigations planned (41%), referrals made to other specialists (33%), changes to dialysis prescriptions (37%), medication changes (39%), dialysis access issues picked up (26%) and new RESPECT discussions (25%).The breakdown of data by time period (2020 group and 2022 group) is shown in Fig. 2 (option 1) OR “the data collected is summarized inFigure 2”(option 2). The proportion of patients achieving their prescribed Kt/V was 63% (2020 group) and 77% (2022 group). The proportion of patients who were eligible for transplant referral but had not yet been referred was 13% (2020 group) and 10% (2022 group). Conclusion The BCH MDT is an worthwhile method to improve coordination of dialysis care, and multi-professional staff in our centre use it as an opportunity to review and improve care. The meeting results in high numbers of actions and adjustments to patient care. Furthermore, in this uncontrolled observational study, there was improvement over time in the proportions of patients achieving adequate Kt/V, and in referral rates for transplant assessment, suggesting a positive impact on MH care.

Vision Problems As a Contributor to Lower Engagement in Care Among Aging Men Living with HIV

ABSTRACT Purpose To investigate vision impairment as a barrier to engagement in medical care among aging persons living with HIV (PLWH) who experience multimorbidity and complex care needs. Setting Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS), a prospective observational cohort of aging PLWH men. Methods We examined relationships of self-reported vision difficulty with indicators of care engagement: 1) adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART; defined as taking ≥95% of medications); 2) self-reported avoidance of medical care; 3) self-reported tendency to ask a doctor questions about care (>2 questions at a medical visit), as well as with quality of life. A modified version of the National Eye Institute Vision Function Questionnaire was administered at three semi-annual visits (from October 2017 to March 2019) to assess difficulty performing vision-dependent tasks. Results We included 1063 PLWH (median age 57 years, 31% Black). Data on care engagement outcomes were analyzed using repeated measures logistic regression with generalized estimating equations adjusted for race, and at visit values for age, education level, depressive symptoms, alcohol use, and smoking status. Compared to no vision difficulty, those reporting moderate to extreme vision difficulty on at least one task had 2.2 times higher odds (95% CI: 1.4, 3.4) of having less than optimal ART adherence, 1.9 times higher odds (95% CI: 1.1, 3.4) of avoiding necessary medical care and median quality of life scores 8 points lower. Conclusion These findings suggest vision impairment decreases medical care engagement including HIV care and quality of life among aging PLWH.

Defining, identifying and addressing problematic polypharmacy within multimorbidity in primary care: a scoping review

IntroductionPolypharmacy and multimorbidity pose escalating challenges. Despite numerous attempts, interventions have yet to show consistent improvements in health outcomes. A key factor may be varied approaches to targeting patients for...

The Effect of Coordinating the Outpatient Treatment across Medical Specialities for Patients With Multimorbidity.

Patients with multimorbidity attend multiple outpatient clinics. We assessed the effects on hospital use of scheduling several outpatient appointments to same-day visits in a multidisciplinary outpatient pathway (MOP). This study used a quasi-experimental design. Eligible patients had multimorbidity, were aged ≥18 years and attended ≥2 outpatient clinics in five different specialties. Patients were identified through forthcoming appointments from August 2018 to March 2020 and divided into intervention group (alignment of appointments) and comparison group (no alignment). We used patient questionnaires and paired analyses to study care integration and treatment burden. Using negative binomial regression, we estimated healthcare utilisation as incidence rates ratios (IRRs) at one year before and one year after baseline for both groups and compared IRR ratios (IRRRs). Intervention patients had a 19% reduction in hospital visits (IRRR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.70-0.96) and a 17% reduction in blood samples (IRRR: 0.83, 0.73-0.96) compared to comparison patients. No effects were found for care integration, treatment burden, outpatient contacts, terminated outpatient trajectories, hospital admissions, days of admission or GP contacts. The MOP seemed to reduce the number of hospital visits and blood samples. These results should be further investigated in studies exploring the coordination of outpatient care for multimorbidity. Can an intervention of coordinating outpatient appointments to same-day visits combined with a multidisciplinary conference influence the utilisation of healthcare services and the patient-assessed integration of healthcare services and treatment burden among patients with multimorbidity?

Socio-economic position, multimorbidity, and health care utilization among Danish left ventricular assist device patients.

Increasing numbers of patients with advanced heart failure and significant comorbidity and social barriers are considered for left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). We sought to examine health care utilization post-LVAD implantation, including the influence of individual-level socio-economic position and multimorbidity. We conducted a Danish nationwide cohort study linking individual-level data from clinical LVAD databases, the Scandiatransplant Database, and Danish national medical and administrative registries. Socio-economic position included cohabitation status, educational level, and employment status. Multimorbidity was defined as two or more chronic conditions from at least two chronic disease groups. Health care utilization (hospital activity, general practice activity, and redeemed medical prescriptions) within 2years post-discharge after LVAD implantation was evaluated using descriptive statistics at 0.5year intervals. We identified 119 patients discharged alive with first-time LVAD implanted between 2006 and 2018. The median age of the patients was 56.1years, and 88.2% were male. Patients were followed until heart transplantation, LVAD explantation, death, 31 December 2018, or for 2years. The median follow-up was 0.8years. The highest median use of health care services was observed 0-0.5years post-LVAD discharge compared with the subsequent follow-up intervals: 0.5-1, 1-1.5, and 1.5-2years, respectively. The median (interquartile range) number of hospitalizations was 10 (7-14), bed days 14 (9-28), outpatient visits 8 (5-12), telephone contacts with a general practitioner 4 (2-8), and total redeemed medical prescriptions 26 (19-37) within 0-0.5years post-LVAD discharge compared with the median utilization within the consecutive follow-up periods [e.g. within 0.5-1year: hospitalizations 5 (3-8), bed days 8 (4-14), outpatient visits 5 (3-8), telephone contacts 2 (0-5), and redeemed medical prescriptions 24 (18-30)]. The median use of health care services was stable from 0.5years onwards. The median number of hospitalizations and bed days was slightly higher in patients living alone with a low educational level or low employment status within 0-0.5years post-LVAD implantation. Finally, the median number of in-hospital days and redeemed prescriptions was higher among patients with pre-existing multimorbidity. Among patients who underwent LVAD implantation, health care utilization was high in the early post-LVAD discharge phase and was influenced by socio-economic position. Multimorbidity influenced the number of in-hospital days and redeemed prescriptions during the 2year follow-up.

Predictors of unplanned emergency hospital admissions among patients aged 65+ with multimorbidity and depression in Northwest London during and after the Covid-19 lockdown in England.

Individuals with multimorbidity have an increased likelihood of using unplanned secondary care including emergency department visits and emergency hospitalisations. Those with mental health comorbidities are affected to a greater extent. The Covid-19 pandemic has negatively impacted on psychosocial wellbeing and multimorbidity care, especially among vulnerable older individuals. To examine the risk of unplanned hospital admissions among patients aged 65+ with multimorbidity and depression in Northwest London, England, during- and post-Covid-19 lockdown. Retrospective cross-sectional data analysis with the Discover-NOW database for Northwest London was conducted. The overall sample consisted of 20,165 registered patients aged 65+ with depression. Two time periods were compared to observe the impact of the Covid-19 lockdown on emergency hospital admissions between 23rd March 2020 to 21st June 2021 (period 1) and equivalent-length post-lockdown period from 22nd June 2021 to 19th September 2022 (period 2). Multivariate logistic regression was conducted on having at least one emergency hospital admission in each period against sociodemographic and multimorbidity-related characteristics. The odds of having an emergency hospitalisation were greater in men than women (OR = 1.19 (lockdown); OR = 1.29 (post-lockdown)), and significantly increased with age, higher deprivation, and greater number of comorbidities in both periods across the majority of categories. There was an inconclusive pattern with ethnicity; with a statistically significant protective effect among Asian (OR = 0.66) and Black ethnicities (OR = 0.67) compared to White patients during post-lockdown period only. The likelihood of unplanned hospitalisation was higher in men than women, and significantly increased with age, higher deprivation, and comorbidities. Despite modest increases in magnitude of risk between lockdown and post-lockdown periods, there is evidence to support proactive case-review by multi-disciplinary teams to avoid unplanned admissions, particularly men with multimorbidity and comorbid depression, patients with higher number of comorbidities and greater deprivation. Further work is needed to determine admission reasons, multimorbidity patterns, and other clinical and lifestyle predictors.

Co-designing care for multimorbidity: a systematic review

BackgroundThe co-design of health care enables patient-centredness by partnering patients, clinicians and other stakeholders together to create services.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of co-designed health interventions for people living with multimorbidity and assessed (a) their effectiveness in improving health outcomes, (b) the co-design approaches used and (c) barriers and facilitators to the co-design process with people living with multimorbidity. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus and PsycINFO between 2000 and March 2022. Included experimental studies were quality assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (ROB-2 and ROBINS-I).ResultsWe screened 14,376 reports, with 13 reports meeting the eligibility criteria. Two reported health and well-being outcomes: one randomised clinical trial (n = 134) and one controlled cohort (n = 1933). Outcome measures included quality of life, self-efficacy, well-being, anxiety, depression, functional status, healthcare utilisation and mortality. Outcomes favouring the co-design interventions compared to control were minimal, with only 4 of 17 outcomes considered beneficial. Co-design approaches included needs assessment/ideation (12 of 13), prototype (11 of 13), pilot testing (5 of 13) (i.e. focus on usability) and health and well-being evaluations (2 of 13). Common challenges to the co-design process include poor stakeholder interest, passive participation, power imbalances and a lack of representativeness in the design group. Enablers include flexibility in approach, smaller group work, advocating for stakeholders’ views and commitment to the process or decisions made.ConclusionsIn this systematic review of co-design health interventions, we found that few projects assessed health and well-being outcomes, and the observed health and well-being benefits were minimal. The intensity and variability in the co-design approaches were substantial, and challenges were evident. Co-design aided the design of novel services and interventions for those with multimorbidity, improving their relevance, usability and acceptability. However, the clinical benefits of co-designed interventions for those with multimorbidity are unclear.

Designing Telemedicine for Older Adults With Multimorbidity: Content Analysis Study.

Telemedicine is a potential option for caring for older adults with multimorbidity. There is a need to explore the perceptions about telemedicine among older adults with multimorbidity to tailor it to the needs of older adults with multiple chronic conditions. This study aims to explore the perceptions about telemedicine among older patients with multimorbidity. A qualitative study was conducted using semistructured interviews. The interview questions examined older adults' perspectives about telemedicine, including their expectations regarding telemedicine services and the factors that affect its use. Thematic analysis was performed using NVivo (version 12; Lumivero). The study was reported using the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. In total, 29 patients with multimorbidity-21 (72%) female patients and 8 (28%) male patients with a mean age of 69 (SD 10.39) years-were included. Overall, 4 themes and 7 subthemes emerged: theme 1-perceived benefit of telemedicine among older adults with multimorbidities, theme 2-appropriate use of telemedicine for multimorbid care, theme 3-telemedicine system catering to the needs of older patients, and theme 4-respect patients' decision to decline to use telemedicine. Telemedicine for older adults with multimorbidity should focus on those with stable conditions. This can help increase access to care for those requiring continuous condition monitoring. A structured telemedicine program and patient-centered services can help increase patient acceptance of telemedicine. However, health care providers must accept the limitations of older patients that may prevent them from receiving telemedicine services.

Perceptions and experiences of living with and providing care for multimorbidity: A qualitative interview study.

Experiences of living with and seeking care for multimorbidity is a relatively under-researched field. By analysing experiences of people with multimorbidity, caregivers and care professionals, we can better understand the complex care needs of those with multimorbidity and identify improvements to care management. This paper reports findings from research that elicited the views of key stakeholders to inform future care practice and policy. To elicit care recipient and care provider views to understand the care needs of those living with and seeking care for multimorbidity. A qualitative interview study using purposive sampling of those living with and providing care in multimorbidity. Increased support to those with multimorbidity and caregivers to navigate care systems was advocated. Establishing trusting care relationships featured prominently in participants accounts. Fragmented care, inadequate coordination and poor communication between care providers, were identified as system-wide challenges. There was agreement that integrated care models were needed, which delivered personalised care, such as shared decision-making, choice in care options and accessing services, and individualised care plans. We found significant agreement among stakeholders on care need and management in multimorbidity. Understanding the experiences of those with multimorbidity, caregivers and care professionals, can inform future improvements in care management.

Kostensenkung und verbesserte Versorgungsqualität für multimorbide, schwer transportable Patient:innen durch Mobile Endoskopische Dysphagie-Diagnostik im ambulanten Setting

Background: Instrumental diagnostic procedures such as the Fiber Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) are recommended as gold standard by the German Society of Neurology (DGN) for the assessment of aspiration risk, extent of disturbance and therapy planning. However, clinical procedures are often used in clinical practice for reasons of costs and handling. Due to their insufficient sensitivity, specificity and rater-dependent variability, these alone are not sufficient to assess the pathomechanisms of a swallowing disorder. In addition, access to FEES is limited for multimorbid and intensive care patients due to transport limitations. The use of Mobile Endoscopic Dysphagia Diagnostics (MEDD) is discussed as a possible solution to the care problem. However, there is a lack of implementation possibilities for a standard deployment in Germany. The purpose of the study is to investigate the implementation requirements of MEDD. Method: Four experts were interviewed using semi-standardized guide interviews on the implementation requirements, optimization and positive and negative aspects of the MEDD. Results: According to experts, MEDD can help to reduce health care costs and increase swallowing-related daily participation among those affected. Moreover, the use of MEDD provides an increasing quality of life and care, as therapists are able to plan and evaluate their treatments in detail using imaging. The standard use of MEDD is mainly limited by unclear legal regulation and accounting aspects as well as an insufficient awareness and trivialization of the symptom complex »dysphagia« by health professionals in Germany. Basically, a health-policy-supported financing model and a revision of the training curricula for the medical profession, speech therapy and nursing profession are required. Conclusion: From the expert's point of view, MEDD can contribute significantly to saving healthcare costs and improving the swallowing-related quality of life of affected patients by differentiated, instrumental and mobile dysphagia diagnostics. For the standard use of MEDD, clear, health-policy-based regulations on delegation, hygiene, emergency management and compensation are necessary, as well as a revision of the training curricula in human medicine and the health professions. Key words: dysphagia, instrumental swallowing diagnostics, FEES, mobile endoscopic dysphagia diagnostics, MEDD

Innovations in use of registry data (INOREG)

Abstract: In recent years there have been several political initiatives in Norway, requiring more research into how multimorbidity and health care pathways in the municipality affect outcomes such as work participation, hospital admissions, disability and quality of life for patients with chronic diseases. Most of the care is provided outside hospitals and has been difficult to capture in large, registry-based studies. Focusing on two important groups, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and musculoskeletal disorders (MSD), the INOREG project aims to reduce these knowledge gaps. In the paper we present 1) the data that are used in the project, 2) the construction of samples, variables and possible methods for analysis and 3) an example on how the data and methods will be applied. The project database is constructed from a novel linkage of national health and welfare registries. The data cover social, primary and specialized care for all COPD and MSD patients in Norway, long-term care data from Oslo and Trondheim municipalities and functioning and quality of life for ca. 2,700 patients treated at physiotherapy clinics in the FYSIOPRIM project. This enables construction of care pathways and outcomes at the individual level from 2008 through 2019. The project will fill knowledge gaps regarding the patterns of care at different levels in the health care system, and the association to outcomes for chronic patient groups. If the project is successful, it will provide improved insight on how to further develop provision and coordination of services to the decision makers, and ideally reduce inequalities in health.

A primary care research agenda for multiple long-term conditions: a Delphi study.

Multiple long-term conditions (MLTC), also known as multimorbidity, has been identified as a priority research topic globally. Research priorities from the perspectives of patients and research funders have been described. Although most care for MLTC is delivered in primary care, the priorities of academic primary care have not been identified. To identify and prioritise the academic primary care research agenda for MLTC. This was a three-phase study with primary care MLTC researchers from the UK and other high-income countries. The study consisted of: an open-ended survey question, a face-to-face workshop to elaborate questions with researchers from the UK and Ireland, and a two-round Delphi consensus survey with international multimorbidity researchers. Twenty-five primary care researchers responded to the initial open-ended survey and generated 84 potential research questions. In the subsequent workshop discussion (n = 18 participants), this list was reduced to 31 questions. The longlist of 31 research questions was included in round 1 of the Delphi; 27 of the 50 (54%) round 1 invitees and 24 of the 27 (89%) round 2 invitees took part in the Delphi. Ten questions reached final consensus. These questions focused broadly on addressing the complexity of the patient group with development of new models of care for multimorbidity, and methods and data development. These high-priority research questions offer funders and researchers a basis on which to build future grant calls and research plans. Addressing complexity in this research is needed to inform improvements in systems of care and for disease prevention.

Predicting anticipated benefit from an extended consultation to personalise care in multimorbidity: a development and internal validation study of a prioritisation algorithm in general practice.

Persons with multimorbidity may gain from person-centred care compared with the current protocolised chronic-disease management in Dutch general practice. Given time constraints and limited resources, it is essential to prioritise those most in need of an assessment of person-centred chronic-care needs. To develop and validate a prioritisation algorithm based on routine electronic medical record (EMR) data that distinguishes between patients with multimorbidity who would, and those who would not, benefit from an extended person-centred consultation to assess person-centred chronic-care needs, as judged by GPs. A mixed-methods study was conducted in five general practices in the north-west region of the Netherlands. Four out of the five practices were situated in rural areas. Multivariable logistic regression using EMR data to predict the GPs' judgement on patients' anticipated benefit from an extended consultation, as well as a thematic analysis of a focus group exploring GPs' clinical reasoning for this judgement were conducted. Internal validation was performed using 10-fold cross-validation. Multimorbidity was defined as the presence of ≥3 chronic conditions. In total, EMRs from 1032 patients were included in the analysis; of these, 352 (34.1%) were judged to have anticipated benefit. The model's cross-validated C-statistic was 0.72 (95% confidence interval = 0.70 to 0.75). Calibration was good. Presence of home visit(s) and history of myocardial infarction were associated with anticipated benefit. Thematic analysis revealed three dimensions feeding anticipated benefit: GPs' cause for concern, patients' mindset regarding their conditions, and balance between received care/expected care needed. This algorithm may facilitate automated prioritisation, potentially avoiding the need for GPs to personally triage the whole practice population that has multimorbidity. However, external validation of the algorithm and evaluation of actual benefit of consultation is recommended before implementation.

Evaluation of patients´ perspective on a multimorbidity patient-centered care model piloted in the chilean public health system

BackgroundThe progressive multimorbidity explosion has challenged Chile’s health systems and worldwide. The Centro de Innovación en Salud ANCORA UC implemented a new Multimorbidity Patient-Centered Care Model in Chile.ObjectiveEvaluate the perspective of high-risk patients about the core elements of the model.MethodologyWe conducted a cross sectional telephone-based survey that considered the application of a 13 items questionnaire. Of them, nine were Likert scale questions with scores from 1 to 7, one dichotomic question, and three open-ended questions. 231 high-risk patients who received care through the model at primary care centers participated in the study. Quantitative data were encoded, consolidated, and analyzed with the SPSS software. We performed descriptive and analytic statistics techniques to assess different variables and their potential associations. Thematic analysis was conducted for qualitative data.ResultsThe overall score was 5.84 (range: 1 to 7), with a standard deviation of 1.25. Questions with the best scores were those related with personalized care and the primary care teams. The lowest scored was for the item regarding the continuity of care between primary nurses and inpatient care at the hospital. There was a difference in patient outcomes depending on their health center. Regarding sociodemographic characteristics, age did not significantly affect the results.ConclusionsThe study reveals the perceptions about a complex multimorbidity intervention from the patient’s perspective. It complements the impact on health services utilization evaluation that supports decision-makers currently scaling up a similar strategy in our country and could be considered in other countries dealing with non-communicable diseases.

People-centred primary health care: a scoping review

BackgroundIntegrated people-centred health services (IPCHS) are vital for ensuring comprehensive care towards achieving universal health coverage (UHC). The World Health Organisation (WHO) envisions IPCHS in delivery and access to health services. This scoping review aimed to synthesize available evidence on people-centred primary health care (PHC) and primary care.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review of published literature on people-centred PHC. We searched eight databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) using search terms related to people-centred and integrated PHC/primary care services. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist to select studies. We analyzed data and generated themes using Gale's framework thematic analysis method. Themes were explained under five components of the WHO IPCHS framework.ResultsA total of fifty-two studies were included in the review; most were from high-income countries (HICs), primarily focusing on patient-centred primary care. Themes under each component of the framework included: engaging and empowering people and communities (engagement of community, empowerment and empathy); strengthening governance and accountability (organizational leadership, and mutual accountability); reorienting the model of care (residential care, care for multimorbidity, participatory care); coordinating services within and across sectors (partnership with stakeholders and sectors, and coordination of care); creating an enabling environment and funding support (flexible management for change; and enabling environment).ConclusionsSeveral people-centred PHC and primary care approaches are implemented in HICs but have little priority in low-income countries. Potential strategies for people-centred PHC could be engaging end users in delivering integrated care, ensuring accountability, and implementing a residential model of care in coordination with communities. Flexible management options could create an enabling environment for strengthening health systems to deliver people-centred PHC services.