Illness Care Research Articles

Conservatorship: Inside California’s System of Coercion and Care for Mental Illness

Conservatorship: Inside California’s System of Coercion and Care for Mental Illness

Clinical Features and Prognosis of Acute Cholangitis in Octogenarians: A Prospective Comparative Study

Background: The data on acute cholangitis in the octogenarian population are very limited. This study aimed to examine the clinical characteristics of acute cholangitis and complications related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in octogenarians. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted prospectively between July 2022 and December 2023 and included 250 patients aged 65 years and older. Patients eligible for the study were divided into two groups: those aged ≥80 years (octogenarian) and those aged 65–79 years (non-octogenarian). These two groups were compared in terms of the clinical characteristics of cholangitis and ERCP-related complications. In addition, factors associated with in-hospital mortality were evaluated. Results: Out of 250 patients, 87 (34.8%) were octogenarians and 163 (65.2%) were non-octogenarians. The median age was 76 (69–82) years. Although the octogenarian group had higher rates of severe illness and intensive care unit admissions (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively), there were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality (p = 0.359) or ERCP-related complications (p = 0.417). Malignant etiology (odds ratio [OR]: 5.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.11–15.3), hypoalbuminemia (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.07–0.45), and qSOFA score ≥ 2 (OR: 6.5, 95% CI: 1.7–24.5) were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Conclusions: Being over 80 years old is not an indicator of poor outcomes, and ERCP can be safely performed on these patients. However, elderly patients with hypoalbuminemia, malignant etiology, or a qSOFA score of ≥2 should be closely monitored, regardless of their age.

Peer-Driven Intervention for Care Coordination and Adherence Promotion for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized, Parallel-Group Clinical Trial.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common condition that is usually treated by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, but poor adherence is common and is associated with worse patient outcomes and experiences. Patient satisfaction is increasingly adopted as a quality indicator by healthcare systems. We tested the hypothesis that peer-driven intervention effected through interactive voice-response(PDI-IVR) system leads to better patient satisfaction (primary outcome), care-coordination, and CPAP adherence when compared to active-control. We performed a 6-month randomized, parallel-group, controlled trial with CPAP naïve patients recruited from four centers and CPAP-adherent patients who were trained to be mentors delivering support through an IVR system. In 263 patients, intention-to-treat analysis global satisfaction for sleep-specific services was better in the intervention group (4.57+0.71 Likert scale score) than in the active-control group (4.10+1.13; P<0.001). CPAP adherence was greater in intervention group (4.5+0.2 hours/night; 62.0+3.0% of nights >4 hours usage) versus active-control group (3.7+0.2 hours/night; 51.4+3.0% of nights >4 hours usage; P=0.014 and P=0.023). When compared to active-control group, Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care ratings was moderately increased by an adjusted difference of 0.33+0.12 (P=0.009); Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Provider and Systems ratings was not different (adjusted difference of 0.46+0.26; P=0.076); and Client Perception of Coordination Questionnaire was mildly better in the intervention group (adjusted difference 0.15+0.07; P=0.035). Patient satisfaction with care delivery, CPAP adherence, and care-coordination was improved by peer-driven intervention through an IVR system. New payor policies compensating peer-support may enable implementation of this approach. Clinical trial registration available at www. gov, ID: NCT02056002.

Research Synthesis Related to Oncology Family Caregiver Spirituality in Palliative Care.

Background: Family caregivers are central to the delivery of serious illness care and also have needs related to their role and experience. One aspect of the family caregiver quality of life (QOL) that has received less attention is caregiver spirituality. Objectives: The research objectives for this analysis were (1) Describe spirituality in oncology family caregivers. (2) Determine the impact of palliative care interventions on spirituality and related variables in oncology family caregivers. (3) Describe findings from the research literature related to spirituality in family caregivers. The authors include two nurse researchers (BF, TB) and a physician (MK) who conducted these studies and a board-certified chaplain (PG) who contributed his expertise in chaplaincy. Design: This study synthesized data from seven earlier studies by the investigators from their research in family caregiving and also compared findings to the literature. Setting/Subjects: Subjects were family caregivers (n = 1039) of patients with cancer from studies conducted primarily in the Western United States. Measurements: The key spirituality instruments used were the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy tool and the City of Hope QOL tool. Results: Spirituality was identified as important to family caregivers and most caregivers reported a religious affiliation. Living with uncertainty was consistently reported as the worst aspect of QOL/spirituality. Having a sense of purpose and meaning was the highest rated area. Conclusions: The authors' research synthesis and the literature support the importance of additional research and clinical focus in family caregiver spirituality in serious illness care.

Homoeopathy vs. conventional primary care in children during the first 24 months of life—a pragmatic randomised controlled trial

To compare the difference between primary homoeopathic and conventional paediatric care in treating acute illnesses in children in their first 24 months of life. One hundred eight Indian singleton newborns delivered at 37 to 42 weeks gestation were randomised at birth (1:1) to receive either homoeopathic or conventional primary care for any acute illness over the study period. In the homoeopathic group, conventional medical treatment was added when medically indicated. Clinicians and parents were unblinded. Children in the homoeopathic group experienced significantly fewer sick days than those in the conventional group (RR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.24–0.58; p < 0.001), with correspondingly fewer sickness episodes (RR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.32–0.87; p = .013), as well as fewer respiratory illnesses over the 24-month period. They were taller (F (1, 97) = 8.92, p = .004, partial eta squared = 0.84) but not heavier than their conventionally treated counterparts. They required fewer antibiotics, and their treatment cost was lower.Conclusion: Homoeopathy, using conventional medicine as a safety backdrop, was more effective than conventional treatment in preventing sick days, sickness episodes, and respiratory illnesses in the first 24 months of life. It necessitated fewer antibiotics and its overall cost was lower. This study supports homoeopathy, using conventional medicine as a safety backdrop, as a safe and cost-effective primary care modality during the first 2 years of life.Trial registration: Clinical Trial Registry-India (2018/09/015641). https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.phpWhat is Known:• Due to their holistic nature, many Complementary and Alternative Medical (CAM) modalities are not readily amenable to assessment by head-to-head RCT for a given Indication.• We propose a pragmatic, RCT comparing homoeopathic with conventional medicine as a system.What is New:• Homoeopathic was apparently superior to conventional primary care in preventing sick days, sickness episodes, and respiratory illness episodes and was significantly associated with growth in height but not weight and required fewer antibiotics in children from birth to 24 months of age.

Narrative Approaches to Serious Illness Care.

Narrative Approaches to Serious Illness Care.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Lifestyle Behavior and Clinical Care Pathway Management in Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Background and Objectives: In Italy, as in the rest of the world, government restrictions aimed at containing the spread of COVID-19 primarily imposed limitations on social relationships and personal behavior. This situation significantly affected the management of chronic illnesses, including type 2 diabetes (T2D). The objective was to evaluate the perceptions of patients with T2D regarding the quality of care received during the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact on dietary and physical activity behaviors. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional survey. Data were collected from June to July 2023 using the convenience sampling of patients with T2D, and the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and Medi-Lite questionnaires were administered. Results: During the research period, out of the 130 subjects who met all enrollment criteria, 103 patients were included in this study (79.23%). The results of the administered questionnaires were heterogeneous. The average scores from the PACIC Questionnaire for each question displayed significant variability, indicating a range of experiences in the quality of care. In the Medi-Lite survey, fruit, cereals, and olive oil showed the highest adherence levels, with mean scores ranging from 2.58 (SD ± 1.18) for fruit to 1.89 (SD ± 0.34) for olive oil and 1.97 (SD ± 0.17) for cereals. Patients who reported increased food intake during the lockdown attributed it to having more time to prepare meals. Physical activity levels remained unchanged for 48 patients, decreased for 45 patients, and only 9 patients managed to exercise more during the COVID-19 restrictions. Conclusions: Healthcare systems must prioritize comprehensive care plans for T2D that address not only physical health, but also emotional and social well-being. Post-pandemic, promoting healthier lifestyles and empowering patients to manage their condition is crucial. A multidisciplinary and multidimensional approach could support the care of vulnerable individuals, such as patients with T2D, especially during crises like pandemics or other dramatic events.

Self-Stigma vs. Perceived Public Stigma Toward Mental Illness in Rural Adults

Introduction: Mental illness is a clinically significant disturbance in an individual's cognition, emotion regulation, or behavior. Stigma toward mental health comes in two primary forms: Self-stigma and perceived public stigma. Purpose: The objective of this study is to quantify the amount of stigma toward mental illness in rural adults and analyze differences in stigma across demographic groups. Methods: Adults were offered a 14-item questionnaire at five different sites from January 2023 to April 2023. Rural distinctions were made based on participants' reported county of residence following the Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs (OCRA) definition of rurality. Demographic information such as age, gender, marital status, total household income, and highest level of education were also obtained. Results: Rural adults experience mild amounts of self-stigma (14.52 +/- 5.0) and moderate amounts of perceived public stigma (18.4 +/- 4.3). Adults aged 46-65 experience more significant levels of perceived public stigma when compared to those of younger participants. An inverse relationship exists between the highest level of education and self-stigma towards mental illness. Seventy two percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed with the statement, “In general, others believe that having a mental illness is a sign of personal weakness or inadequacy.” Conclusions: This study demonstrates that perceived public stigma toward mental illness presents a significant barrier to care for mental illness. Adults aged 46-65 are especially vulnerable to the perceived public stigma toward mental illness. To provide the largest benefit to rural populations, anti-stigma campaigns should focus on perceived public stigma among adults aged 46-65.

Enhanced Primary Care for Severe Mental Illness Reduces Inpatient Admission and Emergency Room Utilization Rates.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of premature mortality among patients with severe mental illness (SMI). Effective care delivery models are needed to address this mortality gap. This study examines the impact of an enhanced primary care (PC) program that specializes in the treatment of patients with SMI, called Medicine in Psychiatry Service-Primary Care (MIPS-PC). Using multipayer claims data in Western New York from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2021, patients with SMI and CVD were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. National Provider Identification numbers of MIPS-PC providers were then used to identify those patients who were treated by MIPS-PC during the period. These MIPS-PC-treated patients were compared against a cohort of one-to-one propensity score matched contemporaneous comparison group (ie, patients receiving PC from providers unaffiliated with MIPS-PC). A difference-in-difference approach was used to identify the treatment effects of MIPS-PC on all-cause emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalization rates. The MIPS-PC group was associated with a downtrend in the acute care utilization rates over a 3-year period following the index date (ie, date of first MIPS-PC or other PC provider encounter), specifically a lower hospitalization rate in the first year since the index date (25%; P < 0.001). ED visit rate reduction was significant in the third-year period (18%; P = 0.021). In summary, MIPS-PC treatment is associated with a decreasing trend in acute care utilization. Prospective studies are needed to validate this effect of enhanced PC in patients with SMI and CVD.

Performance replication of the Hospital Mental Health Risk Screen in ethnoracially diverse U.S. patients admitted through emergency care.

Patients admitted to hospitals after emergency care for injury or acute illness are at risk for later mental health problems. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma Standards for care of injured patients call for mental health risk screening, and the Hospital Mental Health Risk Screen (HMHRS) accurately identified at-risk patients in a developmental study that included patients from five ethnoracial groups. Replication of these findings is essential, because initial positive results for predictive screens can fail to replicate if the items were strongly related to outcomes in the development sample but not in a new sample from the population the screen was intended for. Replication of the predictive performance of the 10-item HMHRS was studied prospectively in ethnoracially diverse patients admitted after emergency care for acute illness or injury in three hospitals across the U.S. Risk screen scores and follow-up mental health outcomes were obtained for 452 of 631 patients enrolled (72%). A cut score of 10 on the HMHRS correctly identified 79% of the patients who reported elevated levels of depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms two months post-admission (sensitivity) and 72% of the patients whose symptoms were not elevated (specificity). HMHRS scores also predicted well for patients with acute illness, for patients with injuries, and for patients who reported an Asian American/Pacific Islander, Black, Latinx, Multirace, or White identity. Predictive performance of the HMHRS was strong overall and within all five ethnoracial subgroups. Routine screening could reduce suffering and health care costs, increase health and mental health equity, and foster preventive care research and implementation. The performance of the HMHRS should be studied in other countries and in other populations of recent trauma survivors, such as survivors of disaster or mass violence.

Inpatient Satisfaction on Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Acute Settings: A Systematic Review.

Many patients experience stress and dissatisfaction when they are admitted to acute settings, where they receive short-term and active care for severe injuries, illnesses, or surgeries. Patient satisfaction is a key indicator of healthcare quality that affects patient outcomes, service delivery, and safety. This review aimed at systematically mapping and summarizing the evidence on non-pharmacological interventions that targeted patient satisfaction in inpatient acute settings. Three electronic databases were searched, including PubMed, EBSCO, and ScienceDirect. The inclusion criteria were: (1) studies of non-pharmacological interventions to improve patients' satisfaction and targeting inpatients between the ages of 19 and 65 years old; (2) studies written in English and published in the last 10 years, starting from 2017. The search results were imported and screened for eligibility on Covidence. The data was then extracted, using a tool entered in Covidence's Extraction 2.0. The extraction tool included domains on both intervention impact and delivery processes. A total of 11 articles met the inclusion criteria. Randomized control trials represented the most among the group; seven studies were included given that the others were quasi-experimental studies. Those studies were conducted on the different types of services offered in acute care departments. These studies did not use a standardized questionnaire to evaluate their respective trial outcomes or to implement various adapted or adopted modules of intervention. Of note, the intervention was effective in enhancing patient satisfaction in only some of the studies. Different types of intervention modules have been effective in improving acute care patient satisfaction. However, further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention among all patients in different acute care departments at the same time.

Association of Calf Circumference, Hand Grip Strength, and Physical Performance with Serious Adverse Events in Patients with Sub-Acute Stroke Hospitalized for Rehabilitation: An Observational Study

ObjectiveTo determine whether calf circumference (CC), hand grip strength (HGS), and physical performance are linked to the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) in patients with sub-acute stroke. DesignRetrospective cohort study. SettingSingle rehabilitation hospital. ParticipantsStroke patients admitted for rehabilitation hospital. InterventionNot applicable. Main Outcome MeasuresThe incidence of SAEs, such as death, cardiovascular events including recurrent stroke, and conditions requiring transfer to another hospital for specialized care or immediate treatment for an acute illness during hospitalization. ResultsA total of 341 patients (median age: 74 years) participated in this study, with 232 patients (68%) exhibiting low physical performance. In the adjusted model, low physical performance was significantly associated with SAEs (HR = 3.01, 95% CI = 1.04-8.68, p = 0.042). However, low CC (HR = 1.60, 95% CI = 0.76-3.38, p = 0.219) and low HGS (HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.39-2.42, p = 0.960) did not show an independent association. ConclusionLow physical performance was independently associated with the occurrence of SAEs during hospitalization for rehabilitation in patients with sub-acute stroke.

Urgent palliative care: An effective intervention to improve end-of-life experience and outcomes for patients with advanced cancer.

203 Background: Early integration of palliative care services for advanced oncology patients has a well-documented benefit on quality-of-life measures including symptom management, quality-of-death measures, cost-effectiveness, care-giver burden, and patient satisfaction metrics. However many barriers exist, including delayed referrals and negative perceptions of hospice/palliative care by patients and families. Furthermore, wait times from referral to visit can vary from weeks to months. For patients with late-stage disease, rapidly advancing disease or symptoms, this delay can lead to unnecessary acute care utilization, impoverished quality-of-life, and discordant end-of-life care. Methods: The CU Cancer Center CARE clinic provides advanced symptom management and urgent care services to oncology patients, often seeing patients with high symptom burden and advanced disease. A recent unpublished case-based analysis demonstrated that patients seen in CARE clinic 4 times or more in a month have a high risk of inpatient mortality within 3 months. In response, the CARE clinic created an urgent palliative care program wherein patients have the ability to see a palliative care provider within 1 week of referral who could provide ongoing advanced symptom management/medication titration and facilitate conversations around goal-concordant care in late-stage illness. A 1-year feasibility pilot took place from 2022-2023. Referrals required patients to meet the following criteria: 1) Not already being seen by an ambulatory palliative care professional; and 2) any of the following: prognosis of weeks without an end-of-life care plan; symptoms likely to require hospitalization if not addressed within a week; or seen in CARE clinic 4 or more times in the last month From 09/2022-08/2023, 55 patients were seen. Outcomes were followed for 3 months following final CARE clinic visit and were compared to patients who had received palliative care referrals from the CARE clinic in the preceding year (9/2021-9/2022). Results: In-hospital deaths, hospital days in the last 30 days of life, and palliative care/hospice involvement were all positively affected in our initial pilot. Notably, in-hospital deaths were reduced by 50%. There was also a 14% increase in deaths with hospice care in the pilot group compared to the control group. Conclusions: Data from this feasibility pilot suggest that urgent palliative care can improve key metrics in oncology quality-of-care, and improve cost effectiveness. Further delineation of the outcomes compared in a rigorously controlled population will further define the relative clinical benefit and fiscal implications of such interventions. Urgent palliative care outcomes. Historical Control (2021-2022) Pilot (2022-2023) N 44 55 Hospitalizations 101 52 Deaths 30 (68%) 40 (72%) Deaths in the Hospital 8 (18%) 5 (9%) Deaths With Hospice Care 21 (47%) 34 (61%)

Multi-Way adaptive Time Aware LSTM for irregularly collected sequential ICU data

In personalized predictive medicine, accurately modeling a patient’s illness and care processes is essential, given their inherent long-term temporal dependencies. However, electronic medical records contain episodic and irregularly timed data due to patients visiting hospitals based on treatment needs, resulting in unique patterns for each hospital stay. Consequently, when constructing a personalized predictive model, it is crucial to consider these factors in order to accurately capture the patient’s health journey.To address this challenge, we present a novel deep dynamic memory neural network called Multi-Way adaptive Time Aware LSTM (MWTA-LSTM). The primary objective of MWTA-LSTM is to leverage medical records, memorize illness trajectories and care processes, estimate current illness states, and predict future risks, thereby providing a high level of precision and predictive power. To enhance its capabilities, MWTA-LSTM extends the conventional Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model in two key ways. Firstly, it incorporates frequency measurement and the most recent observation(last observation) to enhance personalized predictive modeling of patient illnesses, enabling a more accurate understanding of the patient’s condition. Secondly, it parameterizes the cell state to handle irregular timing effectively, utilizing both frequency measurement and elapsed times. Furthermore, the model capitalizes on both to comprehend the impact of interventions on the course of illness on the cell state, facilitating the memorization of illness courses and improving its ability to capture the temporal dynamics of healthcare data, accommodating variations and irregularities in event and observation timing. Lastly, we introduce a novel adaptive pooling strategy that specifically targets and resolves outlier issues that can potentially occur during the analysis of EHR data. By incorporating these features, MWTA-LSTM significantly improves its ability to capture the temporal dynamics of healthcare data, accommodating variations and irregularities in event and observation timing.We validate the effectiveness of our proposed model through empirical experiments conducted on two real-world clinical datasets and three real-world time series datasets. Our results demonstrate the superiority of MWTA-LSTM over current state-of-the-art models and other robust baselines. This showcases the potential of MWTA-LSTM in advancing personalized predictive medicine by offering a more accurate and comprehensive approach to modeling patient health trajectories.

Barriers to serious illness conversations in patients with advanced cancer: A mixed methods study.

228 Background: Serious illness conversations (SICs) are discussions between oncology clinicians and patients with cancer about illness understanding and care preferences. SICs are associated with less intensive and more goal-concordant care near the end of life, but many patients die without an SIC. Methods: PATH-SIC is an ongoing, single-center randomized trial (NCT05629065) that enrolls adults without a documented SIC starting a treatment for breast, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, gynecologic, or lung cancers with an expected prognosis of less than one year. The trial examines the effects of clinician- and patient-nudges on SIC documentation within 60 days of patient’s randomization to one of four arms (no nudge, clinician nudge, patient nudge, or both). This embedded mixed methods study recruited patients who still did not have an SIC 60 days from randomization, their caregivers (if present at time of consent) and oncologists. Interviews explored patients’ and caregivers’ 1) experiences with SICs, 2) perceptions about why SICs may not occur, and 3) suggestions to empower others to initiate SICs. Participating oncologists were surveyed by email. We used qualitative content analysis and descriptive statistics to identify themes. Results: The study included 44 participants: 19 patients, 10 caregivers and 15 oncologists. Patients had a median age of 63 years, were 63% female and 58% White and 68% had gastrointestinal cancers. Though no patient had a documented SIC, patients and their oncologists often disagreed about whether an undocumented SIC had occurred previously (Table). Patients’ and caregivers’ reported barriers to SICs included patient factors (lack of readiness, desire to maintain hope, focus on the present), clinician factors (perceived discomfort with prognostic disclosure and SICs), and prognostic uncertainty (current disease control, unpredictable prognosis). Patients’ and caregivers’ reported facilitators to SICs included patient- (self-advocacy, SIC readiness), clinician- (comfortable rapport), disease- (progression, worsening symptoms), and family-related facilitators (advocates for the patient to engage in SICs). To increase SICs, patients and caregivers reported greater acceptance of interventions involving a personal touch (e.g. phone call) over automated processes. Oncologist survey responses were brief. They reported SICs were most frequently triggered by disease progression or treatment intolerance, and recommended longer appointment times and written materials to facilitate SIC. Conclusions: Patient, caregiver and oncologist feedback on barriers and facilitators to SICs provided useful insights to improve interventions to encourage SICs. Patient/oncologist dyad (n=16) concordance of prior SICs. # of dyads Agreed SIC occurred 7 Agreed SIC did not occur 2 Only oncologist reported SIC 6 Only patient reported SIC 1 Total patient/oncologist dyads 16

Targeting Community-Based Palliative and Serious Illness Care Resources: Challenges of More Stringent Diagnostic Criteria for Prospective Enrollment.

Background: For patients with serious illnesses, one aim of palliative care services is to reduce the frequency and severity of hospital-based episodes of care. Since hospital-alternative palliative care may consume costly resources, providers need to efficiently target high-intensity services toward those most at risk for such adverse episodes of care. Objective: Our objective was to investigate progressively more restrictive diagnosis-based indications of serious illness as used to prospectively identify patients with higher average rates of hospitalization. Design/Setting: We designed an observational cohort quality improvement study using historical Medicare claims records to evaluate diagnostic inclusion criteria for targeting palliative and serious illness care resources. We first isolated a Seriously Ill Population (SIP) and then defined More SIP and Most SIP subgroups. Measurements: Our primary outcome measure was the 2019 acute-care count of hospitalizations for patients in the SIP, More SIP, and Most SIP subgroups, respectively. Results: The More SIP and Most SIP subgroups exhibited higher hospitalization rates. However, they also excluded progressively more seriously ill patients who did experience hospitalizations. In addition, almost half of the Most SIP subgroup were not hospitalized at all, despite having an average hospitalization rate greater than one. Conclusion:Allocating resources (personnel and services) toward reducing hospitalizations when almost half of the targeted population never goes to the hospital could result in unnecessary expenditures and exclude patients that could potentially benefit. Engaging community-based services to detect changes in status could provide supplemental indications of when and for whom to target palliative care resources.

Model of integrated mental health video consultations for people with depression or anxiety in primary care (PROVIDE-C): assessor masked, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

ObjectiveTo evaluate whether an integrated mental health video consultation approach (PROVIDE model) can improve symptoms compared with usual care in adults with depression and anxiety disorders attending primary care.DesignAssessor masked,...

Transcultural adaptation and validation of Persian Version of Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC-5As) Questionnaire in Iranian older patients with type 2 diabetes

BackgroundThe Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC-5As) questionnaire has been designed to evaluate the healthcare experiences of individuals with chronic diseases such as diabetes. Older adults are at higher risk for diabetes and its associated complications. The aim of this study was transcultural adaptation and evaluation of the validity and reliability of the PACIC-5As questionnaire in older patients with diabetes residing in Qazvin City, Iran.MethodIn this validation study, we recruited 306 older patients with diabetes from Comprehensive Health Centers in Qazvin, Iran. The multi-stage cluster sampling technique was used to choose a representative sample. The PACIC-5As questionnaire was translated into Persian using the World Health Organization (WHO) standardized method. The validity (face, content, and construct) and reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) of the PACIC-5As were assessed. Data analysis was conducted using R software and the Lavaan package.ResultsThe mean age of the older patients was 69.99 ± 6.94 years old. Most older participants were female (n = 180, 58.82%) and married (n = 216, 70.59%). Regarding face validity, all items of PACIC-5As had impact scores greater than 1.5. In terms of content validity, all items had a content validity ratio > 0.49 and a content validity index > 0.79. The results of confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the model exhibited satisfactory fit across the expected five factors, including assess, advise, agree, assist, and arrange, for the 25 items of the PACIC-5As questionnaire. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the PACIC-5As questionnaire was 0.805.ConclusionThis study indicates that the Persian version of the PACIC-5As questionnaire is valid and reliable for assessing healthcare experiences in older patients with diabetes. This means that the questionnaire can be effectively used in this population.

Navigating Chronic Illness Care Amidst a Global Pandemic: Insights from Missed Clinic Visits Before, During and After COVID-19 in Nigeria

Navigating Chronic Illness Care Amidst a Global Pandemic: Insights from Missed Clinic Visits Before, During and After COVID-19 in Nigeria

Prevalence of a dual diagnosis of mental illness and substance use disorder in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective cohort study using linked administrative data

ObjectivePopulation-based prevalence estimates of co-occurring mental illness and substance use disorder (herein dual diagnosis) are scarce and derived from a single source (e.g., survey data) which may lead to underestimation of prevalence. We linked administrative data to a representative mental health survey in Ontario, Canada to estimate dual diagnosis prevalence using a data triangulation method. Approach We retrospectively linked the 2002 and 2012 Canadian Community Health Survey on Mental Health (CCHS-MH) to emergency department, inpatient hospital, and outpatient physician records in Ontario, Canada. Mental illness and substance use disorder were ascertained though self-report, Composite International Diagnostic Interview screening, and linked administrative health records. We estimated 1-year, 5-year, and lifetime prevalence of dual diagnosis. ResultsOf the CCHS-MH survey participants, 14,790 (99.8%) were included in the study. The 1-year, 5-year, and lifetime prevalence of dual diagnosis was 2.3%, 4.8%, and 9.8%, respectively, which attenuated to 2.1%, 4.1%, and 8.4%, respectively, when tobacco use disorder was removed from substance use disorder ascertainment. ConclusionDual diagnosis is more common in the general population than previously estimated. Considering barriers to accessing care for both mental illness and substance use disorders among people with dual diagnosis annually, our 5-year prevalence estimate is likely most informative for health system planning. ImplicationsIn the context of increased health burden, barriers to care access, and challenges to effective treatment associated with dual diagnosis, our findings present a case for increased investment in integrated models of mental healthcare and addiction medicine.