Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality Metrics Research Articles

Incorporation of Drone Technology Into the Chain of Survival for OHCA: Estimation of Time Needed for Bystander Treatment of OHCA and CPR Performance.

Drone-delivered automated external defibrillators (AEDs) hold promises in the treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Our objective was to estimate the time needed to perform resuscitation with a drone-delivered AED and to measure cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality. Mock out-of-hospital cardiac arrest simulations that included a 9-1-1 call, CPR, and drone-delivered AED were conducted. Each simulation was timed and video-recorded. CPR performance metrics were recorded by a Laerdal Resusci Anne Quality Feedback System. Multivariable regression modeling examined factors associated with time from 9-1-1 call to AED shock and CPR quality metrics (compression rate, depth, recoil, and chest compression fraction). Comparisons were made among those with recent CPR training (≤2 years) versus no recent (>2 years) or prior CPR training. We recruited 51 research participants between September 2019 and March 2020. The median age was 34 (Q1-Q3, 23-54) years, 56.9% were female, and 41.2% had recent CPR training. The median time from 9-1-1 call to initiation of CPR was 1:19 (Q1-Q3, 1:06-1:26) minutes. A median time of 1:59 (Q1-Q3, 01:50-02:20) minutes was needed to retrieve a drone-delivered AED and deliver a shock. The median CPR compression rate was 115 (Q1-Q3, 109-124) beats per minute, the correct compression depth percentage was 92% (Q1-Q3, 25-98), and the chest compression fraction was 46.7% (Q1-Q3, 39.9%-50.6%). Recent CPR training was not associated with CPR quality or time from 9-1-1 call to AED shock. Younger age (per 10-year increase; β, 9.97 [95% CI, 4.63-15.31] s; P<0.001) and prior experience with AED (β, -30.0 [95% CI, -50.1 to -10.0] s; P=0.004) were associated with more rapid time from 9-1-1 call to AED shock. Prior AED use (β, 6.71 [95% CI, 1.62-11.79]; P=0.011) was associated with improved chest compression fraction percentage. Research participants were able to rapidly retrieve an AED from a drone while largely maintaining CPR quality according to American Heart Association guidelines. Chest compression fraction was lower than expected.

Impact of a COVID-19 code blue protocol on resuscitation care and CPR quality during in-hospital cardiac arrest

ObjectiveWe sought to evaluate the impact of a COVID-19 Code Blue policy on in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) processes of care, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality metrics, and survival to hospital discharge. MethodsWe completed a health record review of consecutive IHCA for which resuscitation was attempted. We report Utstein outcomes and CPR quality metrics 33 months before (July,2017-March,2020) and after (April,2020-December,2022) the implementation of a COVID-19 Code Blue policy requiring all team members to don personal protective equipment including gown, gloves, mask, and eye protection for all IHCA. ResultsThere were 800 IHCA with the following characteristics (Before n = 396; After n = 404): mean age 66, 62.9% male, 81.3% witnessed, 31.3% in the emergency department, 25.6% cardiac cause, and initial shockable rhythm in 16.7%. Among all 404 patients screened for COVID-19, 25 of 288 available test results before IHCA occurred were positive. Comparing the before and after periods: there were relevant time delays (min:sec) in start of chest compressions (0:17vs.0:37;p = 0.005), team arrival (0:43vs.1:21;p = 0.002), 1st rhythm analysis (1:15vs.3:16;p < 0.0001), 1st epinephrine (3:44vs.4:34;p = 0.02), and airway insertion (8:38vs. 10:18;p = 0.02). Resuscitation duration was similar (18:28vs.19:35;p = 0.34). Exception of peri-shock pause which appeared longer (0:06vs.0:14;p = 0.07), chest compression fraction, rate and depth were identical and good. Factors independently associated with survival were age (adjOR 0.98;p < 0.001), male sex (adjOR 1.51;p = 0.048), witnessed (adjOR 2.35;p = 0.02), shockable rhythm (adjOR 3.31;p < 0.0001), hospital location (p = 0.0002), and COVID-19 period (adjOR 0.68;p = 0.052). ConclusionsThe COVID-19 Code Blue policy was associated with delayed processes of care but similarly good CPR quality. The COVID-19 period appeared associated with decreased survival.

Effectiveness of Feedback with Mobile Devices for Quality Measure of CPR Training: A Systematic Review

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a life-saving skill that can significantly increase survival rates in an emergency. Medical professionals, health students, and trained lay people must all perform high-quality CPR. As an outcome, effective CPR training using instruments that support the achievement of high-quality CPR is essential. Objective: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of feedback provided via mobile devices in measuring the quality of CPR training. Method: Design used systematic review with reference to the PRISMA Statement Guidelines 2020. Search results through database of ScienceDirect (778 articles), Wiley Online Library (765 articles), PubMed (55 articles), and ResearchGate (73 articles). The research designs of articles analyzed was randomized controlled trial which published from 2013 to 2023 with the keywords cardiopulmonary resuscitation, CPR training, mobile devices. The sample in this study was taken from five articles that match the inclusion criteria. JBI's critical assessment tool for assessing bias risk in randomly controlled 2023 checklist tests is used to critically evaluate the instruments used for the selected article. Results: The primary results that five publications were based on CPR quality metrics such as chest compression depth and speed, as well as the proportion of acceptable chest compression depth. Conclusions: This review discovered evidence that mobile devices have an effect on the effectiveness of real-time feedback on CPR quality in CPR training. CPR trainees received effective instant guidance from a variety of mobile devices, including smartphones and smart watches equipped with sensors.

Do cardiopulmonary resuscitation real-time audiovisual feedback devices improve patient outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cardiac arrest is a leading cause of mortality in America and has increased in the incidence of cases over the last several years. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) increases survival outcomes in cases of cardiac arrest; however, healthcare workers often do not perform CPR within recommended guidelines. Real-time audiovisual feedback (RTAVF) devices improve the quality of CPR performed. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the effect of RTAVF-assisted CPR with conventional CPR and to evaluate whether the use of these devices improved outcomes in both in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. To identify the effect of RTAVF-assisted CPR on patient outcomes and CPR quality with in- and OHCA. We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE from inception to July 27, 2020, for studies comparing patient outcomes and/or CPR quality metrics between RTAVF-assisted CPR and conventional CPR in cases of IHCA or OHCA. The primary outcomes of interest were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to hospital discharge (SHD), with secondary outcomes of chest compression rate and chest compression depth. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Cochrane Collaboration's "risk of bias" tool. Data was analyzed using R statistical software 4.2.0. results were statistically significant if P < 0.05. Thirteen studies (n = 17600) were included. Patients were on average 69 ± 17.5 years old, with 7022 (39.8%) female patients. Overall pooled ROSC in patients in this study was 37% (95% confidence interval = 23%-54%). RTAVF-assisted CPR significantly improved ROSC, both overall [risk ratio (RR) 1.17 (1.001-1.362); P = 0.048] and in cases of IHCA [RR 1.36 (1.06-1.80); P = 0.002]. There was no significant improvement in ROSC for OHCA (RR 1.04; 0.91-1.19; P = 0.47). No significant effect was seen in SHD [RR 1.04 (0.91-1.19); P = 0.47] or chest compression rate [standardized mean difference (SMD) -2.1; (-4.6-0.5)]; P = 0.09]. A significant improvement was seen in chest compression depth [SMD 1.6; (0.02-3.1); P = 0.047]. RTAVF-assisted CPR increases ROSC in cases of IHCA and chest compression depth but has no significant effect on ROSC in cases of OHCA, SHD, or chest compression rate.

Paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality during simulation of in-hospital transport

In-hospital cardiac arrests that occur outside of the intensive care unit may require transportation during active cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Studies have shown that high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation is imperative for survival with preserved neurologic function. We sought to determine if high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation is maintained during simulated transportation of paediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest. Randomized crossover simulated study of paediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest with 10 teams composed of five providers (physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses and respiratory therapists). Teams remained in a simulation room or transported the mannequin between two rooms. The primary analysis compared chest compression fraction in stationary versus transport simulations. Secondary analyses included additional cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality metrics with comparison to the 2015 American Heart Association standards. There was no significant difference in chest compression fraction or rate between the transport and stationary groups. 92%, 72% and 26% of epochs met American Heart Association criteria for compression fraction, rate and depth, respectively. Stationary simulations were more likely to meet recommendations for combined quality metrics, including compression fraction and rate (77 vs. 53; Chest compression fraction was preserved during simulated in-hospital cardiac arrest with transport. However, the transport simulation was less likely to meet American Heart Association recommendations for combined metrics. Similar to previous cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality studies, both teams failed to meet depth requirements in the majority of simulations.

CPR quality and outcomes after extracorporeal life support for pediatric In-Hospital cardiac arrest

Aim of studyTo determine outcomes in pediatric patients who had an in-hospital cardiac arrest and subsequently received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). Our secondary objective was to identify cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) event characteristics and CPR quality metrics associated with survival after ECPR. MethodsMulticenter retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients in the pediRES-Q database who received ECPR after in-hospital cardiac arrest between July 1, 2015 and June 2, 2021. Primary outcome was survival to ICU discharge. Secondary outcomes were survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurologic outcome at ICU and hospital discharge. ResultsAmong 124 patients included in this study, median age was 0.9 years (IQR 0.2–5) and the majority of patients had primarily cardiac disease (92 patients, 75%). Survival to ICU discharge occurred in 61/120 (51%) patients, 36/61 (59%) of whom had favorable neurologic outcome. No demographic or clinical variables were associated with survival after ECPR. ConclusionIn this multicenter retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients who received ECPR for IHCA we found a high rate of survival to ICU discharge with good neurologic outcome.

The association between CPR quality of In-hospital resuscitation and sex: A hypothesis generating, prospective observational study

IntroductionThe relationship between sex and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) outcomes remains unclear. Particularly, questions remain regarding the potential contribution of unmeasured confounders. We aimed to examine the differences in the quality of chest compression delivered to men and women. MethodsProspective study of observational data recorded during consecutive resuscitations occurring in a single tertiary center (Feb-1-2015 to Dec-31-2018) with real-time follow-up to hospital discharge. The studied variables included time in CPR, no-flow-time and fraction, compression rate and depth and release velocity. The primary study endpoint was the unadjusted association between patient sex and the chest compression quality (depth and rate). The secondary endpoint was the association between the various components of chest compression quality, sex, and survival to hospital discharge/neurologically intact survival. ResultsOverall 260 in-hospital resuscitations (57.7% male patients) were included. Among these 100 (38.5%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and 35 (13.5%) survived to hospital discharge. Female patients were significantly older. Ischemic heart disease and ventricular arrhythmias were more prevalent among males. Compression depth was greater in female vs male patients (54.9 ± 11.3 vs 51.7 ± 10.9 mm; p = 0.024). Other CPR quality-metrics were similar. The rates of ROSC, survival to hospital discharge and neurologically intact survival did not differ between males and females. Univariate analysis revealed no association between sex, quality metrics and outcomes. DiscussionWomen received deeper chest compressions during in-hospital CPR. Our findings require corroboration in larger cohorts but nonetheless underscore the need to maintain high-quality CPR in all patients using real-time feedback devices. Future studies should also include data on ventilation rates and volumes which may contribute to survival outcomes.

Compromised cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality due to regurgitation during endotracheal intubation: a randomised crossover manikin simulation study

BackgroundRegurgitation is a complication common during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This manikin study evaluated the effect of regurgitation during endotracheal intubation on CPR quality.MethodsAn airway-CPR manikin was modified to regurgitate simulated gastric contents into the oropharynx during chest compression during CPR. In total, 54 emergency medical technician-paramedics were assigned to either an oropharyngeal regurgitation or clean airway scenario and then switched to the other scenario after finishing the first. The primary outcomes were CPR quality metrics, including chest compression fraction (CCF), chest compression depth, chest compression rate, and longest interruption time. The secondary outcomes were intubation success rate and intubation time.ResultsDuring the first CPR–intubation sequence, the oropharyngeal regurgitation scenario was associated with a significantly lower CCF (79.6% vs. 85.1%, P < 0.001), compression depth (5.2 vs. 5.4 cm, P < 0.001), and first-pass success rate (35.2% vs. 79.6%, P < 0.001) and greater longest interruption duration (4.0 vs. 3.0 s, P < 0.001) than the clean airway scenario. During the second and third sequences, no significant difference was observed in the CPR quality metrics between the two scenarios. In the oropharyngeal regurgitation scenario, successful intubation was independently and significantly associated with compression depth (hazard ratio = 0.47, 95% confidence interval, 0.24–0.91), whereas none of the CPR quality metrics were related to successful intubation in the clean airway scenario.ConclusionRegurgitation during endotracheal intubation significantly reduces CPR quality.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05278923, March 14, 2022.

Modified Two-Rescuer CPR With a Two-Handed Mask-Face Seal Technique Is Superior To Conventional Two-Rescuer CPR With a One-Handed Mask-Face Seal Technique

Bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation using a two-handed mask-face seal has been shown to be superior to a one-handed mask-face seal during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We aimed to compare CPR quality metrics during simulation-based two-rescuer CPR with a modified two-handed mask-face seal technique and two-rescuer CPR with the conventional one-handed mask-face seal technique. Participants performed two-rescuer CPR on a simulation manakin and alternated between the modified and conventional CPR methods. For the modified method, the first rescuer performed chest compressions and thereafter squeezed the BVM resuscitator bag during the ventilatory pause, while the second rescuer created a two-handed mask-face seal. For the conventional method, the first rescuer performed chest compressions and the second rescuer thereafter delivered rescue breaths by creating a mask-face seal with one hand and squeezing the BVM resuscitator bag with the other hand. Among the 40 participants that were enrolled, the mean ± standard deviation (SD) delivered respiratory volume was significantly higher for the modified two-rescuer method (319.4 ± 71.4 mL vs. 190.2 ± 50.5 mL; p < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences between the two methods with regard to mean ± SD compression rate (117.05 ± 9.67 compressions/min vs. 118.08 ± 10.99 compressions/min; p = 0.477), compression depth (52.80 ± 5.57 mm vs. 52.77 ± 6.77 mm; p = 0.980), chest compression fraction (75.92% ± 2.14% vs. 76.57% ± 2.57%; p = 0.186), and ventilatory pause time (4.62 ± 0.64 s vs. 4.56 ± 0.43 s; p = 0.288). With minor modifications to the conventional method of simulated two-rescuer CPR, rescuers can deliver significantly higher volumes of rescue breaths without compromising the quality of chest compressions.

Effect of smartphone applications on cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality metrics in a mannequin study: A randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE:The aim of this randomized, cross-over trial is to reveal the effect of smartphone cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) feedback applications (App) on a group of lay rescuers' chest compression-only CPR quality metrics. Quality metrics is measured initially and after 3 months.METHODS:A floor-based Resusci Anne mannequin (Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway) was used. Three scenarios (CPR with device App-on [scenario-a], CPR with device App-off [scenario-b], and hands-only CPR [scenario-c]) were randomly allocated to all participants. All the participants performed 2 min of hands only-CPR for each scenario. Data of mean chest compression rate, mean chest compression depth, and recoil were recorded and compared for each scenario.RESULTS:One hundred and thirty-seven first-year students from the Vocational School of Health Services in Turkey participated in this study to mimic lay rescuers. Difference in the initial mean rate of chest compressions was statistically significant when CPR was performed with device App-on (scenario-a) compared to scenarios b and c (P < 0.001, P < 0.001). Furthermore, difference in the mean chest compression rate at the 3rd month was statistically significant among the scenarios when CPR was performed with device App-on (scenario-a) (P = 0.002, P = 0.001). The difference in initial and 3rd month mean compression depth and the percentage of recoil was not statistically significant among the scenarios.CONCLUSION:This study shows that the mean chest compression rate and percentage of compressions with adequate rate improved with smartphone App-on, and these results were persistent up to 3 months.

Cpr Quality among Paramedics and ambulance officers: A Cross-Sectional Simulation Study

Introduction High quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves survival from cardiac arrest, yet CPR quality is often suboptimal, even among trained rescuers. St John Western Australia sought to gather anonymous baseline data on CPR performance by paramedics and ambulance officers in a simulation setting. Methods In a cross-sectional study, participants performed 2 minutes of CPR on a manikin. CPR quality was recorded and compared to recommended standards. Comparisons were also made between women and men. Results The final cohort comprised 1320 participants; 56% paramedics, 20% transport officers and 18% volunteer emergency medical technicians and emergency medical assistants. More than half achieved an overall score of 90% or greater. The median compression score was 96% (IQR 83–99%) while the median ventilation score was 94% (76–99%). Participants achieved the recommended chest compression fraction of ≥60% in 98% of cases. More than half of participants had 99% or more of their compressions reach a depth of ≥50 mm. Two-thirds (68%) recorded a mean compression rate in the range 100–120 compressions per minute. Although there were significant differences in the percentage of compressions deep enough (p&lt;0.01) and the 2-minute mean compression depth (p&lt;0.01) between men and women, the effect size was small. However, men were less likely than women to fully release pressure on the chest after compressions (p&lt;0.01). Conclusion This study provides useful baseline data about CPR quality in a manikin model. Participants achieved relatively high scores for most CPR quality metrics and complied with CPR guidelines in the majority of cases.

Abstract 296: Quality Analysis of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation From Two Emergency Medical Service Systems Using a Feedback Device

Background: High quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) plays a critical role in the success of out-of-hospital resuscitation from sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). AHA guidelines provide protocol to achieve recommended targets for CPR quality metrics including chest compression fraction (CCF), percentage of chest compressions (CCs) with full chest recoil, CC rate and CC depth. Our objective was to report the CPR quality of two emergency medical services (EMS) agencies with different basic life support (BLS) CPR protocols. Methods: Data from 673 patients, 2015 to 2017, suffering out-of-hospital SCA were obtained from Philips FR3 AEDs. The Philips Q-CPR tool was used for real-time CPR feedback, and CC waveforms were recorded for retrospective CPR analysis using Philips Event Review Pro 5.0 and custom software. The two EMS systems had BLS protocol differences: Site 1(King County, WA, n = 93) applied a compression - ventilation ratio of 30:2, while Site 2 (Mecklenburg County, NC, n = 580) applied 200 compressions in each CPR interval and ventilations were performed during CCs. Analyses were performed comparing CPR metrics between sites and to AHA targets. Results: There were 3,460 minutes of resuscitation data analyzed, representing the initial phase of resuscitation prior to ALS. The proportion of cases with shocks was 21.5% (20 of 93) for site 1 and 16.9% (98 of 580) for site 2 (p = 0.3). Both sites achieved guideline metrics though there were statistical differences (Table 1). Compared to site 1, site 2 was associated with a higher CCF, faster CC rate, but less CC depth on average (p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: High quality CPR defined by AHA guidelines was achieved with both sites during the early phase of AED resuscitation though some differences were observed. Additional investigation should identify equipment, or rescuer characteristics that are important to consistently achieve high quality CPR and how the combination might be tailored to optimize individual patient outcome.

Pediatric in-hospital CPR quality at night and on weekends

IntroductionSurvival after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) has been reported to be worse for arrests at night or during weekends.This study aimed to determine whether measured cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality metrics might explain this difference in outcomes. MethodsIHCA data was collected by the Pediatric Resuscitation Quality (pediRES-Q) collaborative for patients <18 years. Metrics of CPR quality [chest compression rate, depth and fraction] were measured using monitordefibrillator pads, and events were compared by time of day and day of week. ResultsWe evaluated 6915 sixty-second epochs of chest compression (CC) data from 239 subjects between October 2015 and March 2019, across 18 hospitals. There was no significant difference in CPR quality metrics during day (07:00–22:59) versus night (23:00–06:59), or weekdays (Monday 07:00 to Friday 22:59) versus weekends (Friday 23:00 to Monday 06:59).There was also no difference in rate of return of circulation. However, survival to hospital discharge was higher for arrests that occurred during the day (39.1%) vs. nights (22.4%, p = 0.015), as well as on weekdays (39.9%) vs. weekends (19.1%, p = 0.003). ConclusionsFor pediatric IHCA where CC metrics were obtained, there was no significant difference in CPR quality metrics or rate of return of circulation by time of day or day of week. There was higher survival to hospital discharge when arrests occurred during the day (vs. nights), or on weekdays (vs. weekends), and this difference was not related to disparities in CC quality.

Impact of 'synchronous' and 'asynchronous' CPR modality on quality bundles and outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.

During cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), the need to interrupt chest compressions to provide synchronous ventilations prevents blood flow continuity, reducing the possibility to ensure high-quality CPR bundles of care and, thus, having a potentially negative impact on perfusion and patient outcome. Contemporaneous asynchronous chest compressions and ventilations may avoid these potentially negative effects. Only a few studies measured the CPR quality metrics during synchronous and asynchronous CPR modality and its relation to patient outcome. A prospective observational study was conducted on 285 consecutive adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated by EMS teams over a 30-month period. Ventilation rate, chest compression fraction (i.e. cardiac arrest time spent delivering uninterrupted chest compressions compared to total cardiac arrest time) and chest compression rate per minute were collected in real time by defibrillators and analysed through a dedicated software (electrical cardiac activity through the ECG, chest compression and ventilations through the transthoracic impedance) during synchronous and asynchronous CPR modalities. During asynchronous CPR modality, higher ventilation rate and chest compression fraction (p < 0.001), and lower chest compression rate per minute (p < 0.001) were ensured, being all cited metrics more adherent to the high-quality CPR bundles. Ventilation rate provided during the whole CPR was an independent predictor for a good neurological outcome (OR 3.795, p = 0.005). Asynchronous chest compression and ventilation ensured the most adequate chest compression fraction, uninterrupted chest compression rate and ventilation rate.

Self-Assessment Feedback Form Improves Quality of Out-of-Hospital CPR

Objective: Various continuous quality improvement (CQI) approaches have been used to improve quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) delivered at the scene of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We evaluated a post-event, self-assessment, CQI feedback form to determine its impact on delivery of CPR quality metrics. Methods: This before/after retrospective review evaluated data from a CQI program in a midsized urban emergency medical services (EMS) system using CPR quality metrics captured by Zoll Medical Inc. X-series defibrillator ECG files in adult patients (≥18 years old) with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Two 9-month periods, one before and one after implementation of the feedback form on December 31, 2013 were evaluated. Metrics included the mean and percentage of goal achievement for chest compression depth (goal: >5 centimeters [cm]; >90%/episode), rate (goal: 100–120 compressions/minute [min]), chest compression fraction (goal: ≥75%), and preshock pause (goal: <10 seconds [sec]). The feedback form was distributed to all EMS providers involved in the resuscitation within 72 hours for self-review. Results: A total of 439 encounters before and 621 encounters after were evaluated including basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS) providers. The Before Group consisted of 408 patients with an average age of 61 ± 17 years, 61.8% male. The After Group consisted of 556 patients with an average age of 61 ± 17 years, 58.3% male. Overall, combining BLS and ALS encounters, the mean CPR metric values before and after were: chest compression depth (5.0 cm vs. 5.5 cm; p < 0.001), rate (109.6/min vs 114.8/min; p < 0.001), fraction (79.2% vs. 86.4%; p < 0.001), and preshock pause (18.8 sec vs. 11.8 sec; p < 0.001), respectively. Overall, the percent goal achievement before and after were: chest compression depth (48.5% vs. 66.6%; p < 0.001), rate (71.8% vs. 71.7%, p = 0.78), fraction (68.1% vs. 91.0%; p < 0.001), and preshock pause (24.1% vs. 59.5%; p < 0.001), respectively. The BLS encounters and ALS encounters had similar statistically significant improvements seen in all metrics. Conclusion: This post-event, self-assessment CQI feedback form was associated with significant improvement in delivery of out-of-hospital CPR depth, fraction and preshock pause time.

Characterization of Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality Metrics Across an International Resuscitation Collaborative.

Pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality metrics have been reported in few children less than 8 years. Our objective was to characterize chest compression fraction, rate, depth, and compliance with 2015 American Heart Association guidelines across multiple pediatric hospitals. Retrospective observational study of data from a multicenter resuscitation quality collaborative from October 2015 to April 2017. Twelve pediatric hospitals across United States, Canada, and Europe. In-hospital cardiac arrest patients (age < 18 yr) with quantitative cardiopulmonary resuscitation data recordings. None. There were 112 events yielding 2,046 evaluable 60-second epochs of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (196,669 chest compression). Event cardiopulmonary resuscitation metric summaries (median [interquartile range]) by age: less than 1 year (38/112): chest compression fraction 0.88 (0.61-0.98), chest compression rate 119/min (110-129), and chest compression depth 2.3 cm (1.9-3.0 cm); for 1 to less than 8 years (42/112): chest compression fraction 0.94 (0.79-1.00), chest compression rate 117/min (110-124), and chest compression depth 3.8 cm (2.9-4.6 cm); for 8 to less than 18 years (32/112): chest compression fraction 0.94 (0.85-1.00), chest compression rate 117/min (110-123), chest compression depth 5.5 cm (4.0-6.5 cm). "Compliance" with guideline targets for 60-second chest compression "epochs" was predefined: chest compression fraction greater than 0.80, chest compression rate 100-120/min, and chest compression depth: greater than or equal to 3.4 cm in less than 1 year, greater than or equal to 4.4 cm in 1 to less than 8 years, and 4.5 to less than 6.6 cm in 8 to less than 18 years. Proportion of less than 1 year, 1 to less than 8 years, and 8 to less than 18 years events with greater than or equal to 60% of 60-second epochs meeting compliance (respectively): chest compression fraction was 53%, 81%, and 78%; chest compression rate was 32%, 50%, and 63%; chest compression depth was 13%, 19%, and 44%. For all events combined, total compliance (meeting all three guideline targets) was 10% (11/112). Across an international pediatric resuscitation collaborative, we characterized the landscape of pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest chest compression quality metrics and found that they often do not meet 2015 American Heart Association guidelines. Guideline compliance for rate and depth in children less than 18 years is poor, with the greatest difficulty in achieving chest compression depth targets in younger children.

LO67: The impact of CPR quality during entire resuscitation episode on survival from cardiac arrest

Introduction: High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is essential for patient survival. Typically, CPR quality is only measured during the first 10 minutes of resuscitation. There is limited research examining the quality of CPR over the entire duration of resuscitation.Objective: To examine the quality of CPR over the entire duration of resuscitation and correlate the quality of CPR to patient survival. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study using data from the Toronto RescuNET Epistry-Cardiac Arrest database. We included consecutive, adult (&amp;gt;18) OHCA treated by EMS between January 1, 2014 and September 30, 2015. High-quality CPR was defined, in accordance with 2015 AHA Guidelines, as a chest compression rate of 100-120/min, depth of 5.0-6.0 cm and chest compression fraction (ccf) of &amp;gt;0.80. We further categorized high-quality resuscitation as meeting benchmarks &amp;gt;80% of the time, moderate-quality between 50-80% and low-quality meeting benchmarks &amp;lt;50% of the resuscitation. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine association between variables of interest, including CPR quality metrics, and survival to hospital discharge. Results: A total of 5,208 OHCA met our inclusion criteria with a survival rate of 8%. The median (IQR) duration of resuscitation was 23.0 min (15.0,32.7). Overall CPR quality was considered high-quality for ccf in 81% of resuscitation episodes, 41% for rate, and 7% for depth. The percentage of resuscitations meeting the quality benchmarks differed between survivors and non-survivors for both depth (15% vs 6%) and ccf (61% vs 83%) (P value &amp;lt;0.001). After controlling for Utstein variables maintaining a chest compression depth within recommendations for &amp;gt;80% showed a trend towards improved survival (OR 1.68, 95% CI 0.96, 2.92). Other variables associated with survival were public location, initial CPR by EMS providers or bystanders, witnessed cardiac arrest (EMS or bystander), and initial shockable rhythm. Increasing age and longer duration of resuscitation were associated with decreased survival. Conclusion: Overall, EMS providers were not able to maintain rate or depth within guideline recommendations for the majority of the duration of resuscitation. Maintaining chest compression depth for greater than 80% of the resuscitation showed a trend towards increased survival from OHCA.

Abstract 12684: Cpr Quality During Out- Of- Hospital Cardiac Arrest Transport

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated significant associations between cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality metrics and survival to hospital discharge following out-of- hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). No large study has explored the relationship between location of resuscitation (scene vs. transport) and CPR quality. Objective: We sought to determine the impact of CPR location on CPR quality metrics during OHCA. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data from the Toronto RescuNET Epistry- cardiac arrest database. We analyzed CPR quality data from all treated adult OHCA occurring over a 39 month period beginning January 1, 2013. We included OHCA patients who underwent resuscitation by emergency medical services and had CPR quality metric data for both scene and transport phases of the resuscitation. Based on 2010 American Heart Association guidelines, high quality CPR was defined as chest compression fraction (CCF)&gt; 0.70, compression rate &gt;100/min and compression depth &gt; 5.0 cm. Scene and transport CPR quality metrics were compared for each patient using a Wilcoxon rank-sum paired-samples test . The proportion of patients who received high quality CPR (defined as meeting all 3 CPR quality benchmarks) was compared between resuscitation locations using a chi-square statistic. Results: Amongst 842 included patients (69.5% male, mean (SD) age 66.8±17.0), median compression rate was statistically higher on scene compared to transport (105.8 vs. 102.0 ; Δ 3.8; 95% CI: 2.5, 4.0), while median compression depth (5.56 vs. 5.33; Δ 0.23; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.26) and median CCF (0.95 vs. 0.87; Δ 0.08; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.08) were statistically higher during the transport phase. The proportion of patients with high quality CPR was similar on scene compared to during transport (45.8% vs. 42.5%; Δ 3.3; 95% CI: -1.4, 8.1). Conclusions: High quality CPR metrics were identified in both (scene and transport) locations of resuscitation and exceeded current CPR quality benchmarks. These results suggest that high quality, manual compressions can be performed by well-trained EMS systems regardless of location. Further study is required to determine whether these metrics can be replicated in other EMS jurisdictions.

Reliability and accuracy of the thoracic impedance signal for measuring cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality metrics

AimTo determine the accuracy and reliability of the thoracic impedance (TI) signal to assess cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality metrics. MethodsA dataset of 63 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest episodes containing the compression depth (CD), capnography and TI signals was used. We developed a chest compression (CC) and ventilation detector based on the TI signal. TI shows fluctuations due to CCs and ventilations. A decision algorithm classified the local maxima as CCs or ventilations. Seven CPR quality metrics were computed: mean CC-rate, fraction of minutes with inadequate CC-rate, chest compression fraction, mean ventilation rate, fraction of minutes with hyperventilation, instantaneous CC-rate and instantaneous ventilation rate. The CD and capnography signals were accepted as the gold standard for CC and ventilation detection respectively. The accuracy of the detector was evaluated in terms of sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). Distributions for each metric computed from the TI and from the gold standard were calculated and tested for normality using one sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. For normal and not normal distributions, two sample t-test and Mann–Whitney U test respectively were applied to test for equal means and medians respectively. Bland–Altman plots were represented for each metric to analyze the level of agreement between values obtained from the TI and gold standard. ResultsThe CC/ventilation detector had a median sensitivity/PPV of 97.2%/97.7% for CCs and 92.2%/81.0% for ventilations respectively. Distributions for all the metrics showed equal means or medians, and agreements >95% between metrics and gold standard was achieved for most of the episodes in the test set, except for the instantaneous ventilation rate. ConclusionWith our data, the TI can be reliably used to measure all the CPR quality metrics proposed in this study, except for the instantaneous ventilation rate.