Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Group Research Articles

Survival After Intra-Arrest Transport vs On-Scene Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Children

For pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), emergency medical services (EMS) may elect to transport to the hospital during active cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (ie, intra-arrest transport) or to continue on-scene CPR for the entirety of the resuscitative effort. The comparative effectiveness of these strategies is unclear. To evaluate the association between intra-arrest transport compared with continued on-scene CPR and survival after pediatric OHCA, and to determine whether this association differs based on the timing of intra-arrest transport. This cohort study included pediatric patients aged younger than 18 years with EMS-treated OHCA between December 1, 2005 and June 30, 2015. Data were collected from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epidemiologic Registry, a prospective 10-site OHCA registry in the US and Canada. Data analysis was performed from May 2022 to February 2024. Intra-arrest transport, defined as an initiation of transport prior to the return of spontaneous circulation, and the interval between EMS arrival and intra-arrest transport. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Patients who underwent intra-arrest transport at any given minute after EMS arrival were compared with patients who were at risk of undergoing intra-arrest transport within the same minute using time-dependent propensity scores calculated from patient demographics, arrest characteristics, and EMS interventions. We examined subgroups based on age (<1 year vs ≥1 year). Of 2854 eligible pediatric patients (median [IQR] age, 1 [0-9] years); 1691 males [59.3%]) who experienced OHCA between December 2005 and June 2015, 1892 children (66.3%) were treated with intra-arrest transport and 962 children (33.7%) received continued on-scene CPR. The median (IQR) time between EMS arrival and intra-arrest transport was 15 (9-22) minutes. In the propensity score-matched cohort (3680 matched cases), there was no significant difference in survival to hospital discharge between the intra-arrest transport group and the continued on-scene CPR group (87 of 1840 patients [4.7%] vs 95 of 1840 patients [5.2%]; risk ratio [RR], 0.81 [95% CI, 0.59-1.10]). Survival to hospital discharge was not modified by the timing of intra-arrest transport (P value for the interaction between intra-arrest transport and time to matching = .10). Among patients aged younger than 1 year, intra-arrest transport was associated with lower survival to hospital discharge (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.83) but there was no association for children aged 1 year or older (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.77-1.93). In this cohort study of a North American OHCA registry, intra-arrest transport compared with continued on-scene CPR was not associated with survival to hospital discharge among children with OHCA. However, intra-arrest transport was associated with a lower likelihood of survival to hospital discharge among children aged younger than 1 year.

REMIMAZOLAM IMPROVES THE MARKERS OF POSTRESUSCITATION CEREBRAL INJURY IN A SWINE MODEL OF CARDIAC ARREST.

Introduction: Previous studies have manifested that those sedatives acting on γ-aminobutyric acid A (GABAa) receptor could produce effective brain protection against regional and global ischemic stimulation. The present study was designed to investigate the effect of a novel GABAa receptor agonist, remimazolam postconditioning (RP) on cerebral outcome after global ischemic stimulation induced by cardiac arrest and resuscitation in swine. Methods: A total of 24 swine were used in this study, in which the animals were randomly divided into the following three groups: sham group (n = 6), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) group (n = 9), and CPR + RP group (n = 9). The experimental model was established by the procedure of 10 min of cardiac arrest and 5 min of CPR. Those resuscitated swine in the CPR + RP group received an intravenous infusion of 2.5 mg/kg of remimazolam within 60 min. Postresuscitation cerebral injury biomarkers and neurological function were evaluated for a total of 24 h. At 24 h after resuscitation, brain cortex was harvested to evaluate the severity of pathologic damage, including tissue inflammation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and necroptosis. Results: Baseline characteristics and CPR outcomes were not significantly different between the CPR and CPR + RP groups. After resuscitation, significantly greater cerebral injury and neurological dysfunction were observed in the CPR and CPR + RP groups than in the sham group. However, remimazolam postconditioning significantly alleviated cerebral injury and improved neurological dysfunction after resuscitation when compared with the CPR group. At 24 h after resuscitation, tissue inflammation, oxidative stress, and cell apoptosis and necroptosis were significantly increased in the CPR and CPR + RP groups when compared with the sham group. Nevertheless, the severity of pathologic damage mentioned previously were significantly milder in those swine treated with the remimazolam when compared with the CPR group. Conclusions: In a swine model of cardiac arrest and resuscitation, the remimazolam administered after resuscitation significantly improved the markers of postresuscitation cerebral injury and therefore protected the brain against global ischemic stimulation.

비보건계열 대학생 대상 시뮬레이션 기반 심폐소생술 교육 프로그램의 효과

Objectives The purpose of this study is to develop simulation-based cardiopulmonary resuscitation education and apply it to non-health related college students to understand its effect.&#x0D; Methods This study was conducted on 54 non-health college students (27 in the experimental group and 27 in the control group). The control group received the general cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education, and the experimental group received the shortened version of the CPR education provided to the control group and the simulation-based CPR education developed in this study.&#x0D; Results Simulation-based CPR education was developed and applied in five stages: analysis, design, development, implement, and evaluation. The experimental group's cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance was 41.22±3.91 points, and the control group's cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance was 28.15±4.05 points, indicating a significant difference in cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance (Z=-6.32, p=&lt;.001). There were no significant differences in knowledge of CPR (Z=-0.04, p=.972), confidence in performing CPR (Z=1.00, p=.922), education satisfaction (Z=-0.28, p=.782), and immersion (Z=-0.08, p=.935).&#x0D; Conclusions Simulation-based CPR education programs was found to be effective in improving CPR performance. Therefore, the simulation-based CPR program can be used as an effective educational method for non-health college students, and it is necessary to consider ways that can be applied not only to college students but also to the general public.

End-tidal carbon dioxide after sodium bicarbonate infusion during mechanical ventilation or ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation

PurposeEnd-tidal CO2 is used to monitor the ventilation status or hemodynamic efficacy during mechanical ventilation or cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and it may be affected by various factors including sodium bicarbonate administration. This study investigated changes in end-tidal CO2 after sodium bicarbonate administration. Materials and methodsThis single-center, prospective observational study included adult patients who received sodium bicarbonate during mechanical ventilation or CPR. End-tidal CO2 elevation was defined as an increase of ≥20% from the baseline end-tidal CO2 value. The time to initial increase (lag time, Tlag), time to peak (Tpeak), and duration of the end-tidal CO2 rise (Tduration) were compared between the patients with spontaneous circulation (SC group) and those with ongoing resuscitation (CPR group). ResultsThirty-three patients, (SC group, n = 25; CPR group, n = 8), were included. Compared with the baseline value, the median values of peak end-tidal CO2 after sodium bicarbonate injection increased by 100% (from 21 to 41 mmHg) in all patients, 89.5% (from 21 to 39 mmHg) in the SC group, and 160.2% (from 15 to 41 mmHg) in the CPR group. The median Tlag was 17 s (IQR: 12–21) and the median Tpeak was 35 s (IQR: 27–52). The median Tduration was 420 s (IQR: 90–639). The median Tlag, Tpeak, and Tduration were not significantly different between the groups. Tduration was associated with the amount of sodium bicarbonate for SC group (correlation coefficient: 0.531, p = 0.006). ConclusionThe administration of sodium bicarbonate may lead to a substantial increase in end-tidal CO2 for several minutes in patients with spontaneous circulation and in patients with ongoing CPR. After intravenous administration of sodium bicarbonate, the use of end-tidal CO2 pressure as a physiological indicator may be limited.

Real-world comparison between mechanical and manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the COVID-19 pandemic

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant challenges to healthcare systems worldwide, including an increase in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA). Healthcare providers are now required to use personal protective equipment (PPE) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Additionally, mechanical CPR devices have been introduced to reduce the number of personnel required for resuscitation. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of CPR performed with a mechanical device and the outcomes of manual CPR performed by personnel wearing PPE. MethodsThis multicenter observational study utilized data from the Korean Cardiac Arrest Research Consortium registry. The study population consisted of OHCA patients who underwent CPR in emergency departments (EDs) between March 2020 and June 2021. Patients were divided into two equal propensity score matched groups: mechanical CPR group (n = 421) and PPE-equipped manual CPR group (n = 421). Primary outcomes included survival rates and favorable neurological outcomes at discharge. Total CPR duration in the ED was also assessed. ResultsThere were no significant between-group differences with respect to survival rate at discharge (mechanical CPR: 7.4% vs PPE-equipped manual CPR: 8.3%) or favorable neurological outcomes (3.3% vs. 3.8%, respectively). However, the mechanical CPR group had a longer duration of CPR in the ED compared to the manual CPR group. ConclusionThis study found no significant differences in survival rates and neurological outcomes between mechanical CPR and PPE-equipped manual CPR in the ED setting. However, a longer total CPR duration was observed in the mechanical CPR group. Further research is required to explore the impact of PPE on healthcare providers' performance and fatigue during CPR in the context of the pandemic and beyond.

COMPARISON BETWEEN ACTIVE ABDOMINAL COMPRESSION-DECOMPRESSION CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION AND STANDARD CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION IN ASPHYCTIC CARDIAC ARREST RATS WITH MULTIPLE RIB FRACTURES.

Background: Active abdominal compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (AACD-CPR) is potentially more effective for cardiac arrest (CA) with multiple rib fractures. However, its effect on survival rates and neurological outcomes remains unknown. This study aimed to assess if AACD-CPR improves survival rates and neurological outcomes in a rat model of asphyctic CA with multiple rib fractures. Methods: Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into three groups-AACD group (n = 15), standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (STD-CPR) group (n = 15), and sham group (n = 10)-after bilateral rib fractures were surgically created and endotracheal intubation was performed. AACD-CPR and STD-CPR groups underwent 8 min of asphyxia followed by different CPR techniques. The sham group had venous catheterization only. Physiological variables and arterial blood gases were recorded at baseline and during a 4-h monitoring period. Neurological deficit scores (NDSs) and cumulative survival rates were assessed at 24, 48, and 72 h. NDS, serum biomarkers, and hippocampal neuron analysis were used to evaluate neurological outcomes. Results: No statistical differences were observed in the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 24-, 48-, and 72-h survival rates between the AACD-CPR and STD-CPR groups. AACD-CPR rats had lower serum levels of neuron-specific enolase and S100B at 72 h post-ROSC, and higher NDS at 72 h post-ROSC compared with STD-CPR animals. Cellular morphology analysis, hematoxylin and eosin staining, and TUNEL/DAPI assays showed more viable neurons and fewer apoptotic neurons in the AACD-CPR group than in the STD-CPR group. Conclusions: AACD-CPR can achieve similar survival rates and better neurological outcome after asphyxial CA in rats with multiple rib fractures when compared with STD-CPR.

Does the type of mechanical chest compressor affect resuscitation outcome of out of hospital cardiac arrest patients? A propensity-score based comparison of three devices

Abstract Background Mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) devices are currently recommended when high-quality CPR could not be provided and only if used by trained rescuers. Guidelines are against their routinely use since clinical trials results are controversial, and solid evidence of improved survival are missing. Moreover, many studies compared these devices to very high-quality manual CPR, hardly replicable in a pre-hospital emergency setting. Nowadays, different machines are available but literature is poor in direct comparison studies. Purpose To assess whether the type of mechanical chest compressor could affect the probability of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and of 30-days mortality after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) as compared to manual standard CPR. Methods Data were prospectively collected from our Utstein-based cardiac arrest registry. We considered all OHCAs from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2022 from 7 provinces covered by the same regional emergency system (population covered 4.2mln. inhabitants) but equipped with three different types of mechanical compressor: Autopulse®; LUCAS® and Easy Pulse®. Patients treated with mechanical CPR and manual CPR were randomly matched via a multivariable logistic regression propensity score considering age, gender, witnessed OHCA, presence of bystander CPR, first rhythm recorded, EMS arrival time and lay defibrillation before EMS arrival. Logistic regression and COX regression models were performed and adjusted for resuscitation duration to investigate the association between the type of CPR and the probability of ROSC and of 30-day mortality. Results Among 13,203 OHCAs with attempted CPR, 10,497 (79.5%) received manual CPR and in 2,405 (18.2%) mechanical CPR [Easy Pulse® in 1,102(45.8%), Autopulse® in 776 (32.3%) and LUCAS® in 521 (21.7%)]. ROSC before hospital admission was obtained in 1,712 patients (13.0%) and 762 (5.8%) were alive after 30 days. After propensity score matching two homogeneous groups of 1,946 patients each (manual and mechanical CRP) were identified. The rate of ROSC and of 30-day survival were lower in the mechanical CPR group (ROSC: 14.7% vs 24.1%; p&amp;lt;0.001; 30-day survival 6% vs 14%; p&amp;lt;0.001). The three devices showed an independent association with the probability of ROSC as compared to manual CPR [Autopulse®: OR 1.76, 95% CI (1.36-2.28) p&amp;lt;0.001; LUCAS®:OR 1.55, 95% CI (1.13-2.13), p=0.006 and Easy Pulse®:OR 0.49; 95% CI (0.37-0.65), p&amp;lt;0.001] (Figure 1A). Only Autopulse® was independently associated with 30-day mortality [AutoPulse HR 0.87, 95%CI (0.79-0.97), p=0.01; LUCAS®: HR 1.00, 95%CI (0.88-1.14), p=0.97) and Easy Pulse®: HR: 1.06, 95%CI (0.97-1.16), p=0.19] (Figure 1B). Conclusions This is the first study comparing the performance of three devices for mechanical chest compressions revealing that they differently affect the probability of ROSC and of 30-day survival.

Abstract 242: Assessment of Biomarkers After Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation versus Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Background: Multiple biomarkers have been used in prognostication of outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Limited evidence exists for patients resuscitated with extracorporeal CPR (ECPR). We hypothesized that (1) the time course and (2) prognostic performance of biomarkers will differ between CPR and ECPR. Methods: This is a pre-planned sub-analysis of Prague-OHCA study. Patients were randomized to either CPR or ECPR. The primary outcome was poor neurologic outcome at 180 days, defined as a cerebral performance category (CPC) of 3-5. Secondary outcomes included assessment of biomarkers of neurologic injury (NSE), inflammation (procalcitonin - PCT, C-reactive protein - CRP, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio - NLR) and hematology (platelets - Plt, D-dimers - D-dim, and fibrinogen - Fg) using Mann-Whitney test with Bonferroni correction, and ROC analysis of data at 24-72 h. Results: In as-treated analysis, ECPR was used in 92 patients. The primary outcome was not different between groups: CPR, CPC 1-2 48 (29.3%) vs CPC 3-5 116 (70.7%); ECPR, CPC 1-2 20 (21.7%) vs CPC 3-5 72 (78.3%); p= 0.191. In general, individual biomarkers exhibited similar trajectories over 72 h, with worse values in patients with CPC 3-5 in both CPR and ECPR groups. PCT was higher in ECPR group at 24-72 h (all p&lt;0.01). NSE, CRP and NLR did not differ between groups. Plt, D-dim and Fg were lower in ECPR vs CPR groups at 24-72 h (all p&lt;0.001). ROC analysis showed the best performance of NSE in both CPR and ECPR groups (AUC 24 h: 0.89 vs 0.78; 48 h: 0.9 vs 0.9; 72 h: 0.91 vs 0.9). PCT showed good performance specifically in ECPR (AUC 24 h: 0.72 vs 0.84; 48 h 0.73 vs 0.87; 72 h: 0.73 vs 0.86). Optimal cutoff points were higher in ECPR vs CPR in NSE (24 h: 60 vs 84; 48 h: 65 vs 61; 72 h: 39 vs 57) and PCT (24 h: 1.8 vs 11, 48 h: 1.0 vs 5.3, 72 h: 0.9 vs 5.6). Conclusions: Biomarkers have similar trajectories after OHCA rescued with either CPR or ECPR although absolute values were higher in ECPR. NSE had superior prognostic value in both groups while PCT showed a good prognostic performance specifically in the ECPR group. Additional studied biomarkers may have modest incremental value. Prognostication algorithms using biomarkers should reflect a mode of resuscitation.

Cerebral hemodynamic effects of head-up CPR in a porcine model

AimTo assess the hemodynamic effects of head elevation on cerebral perfusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. MethodsVF was induced in eight 65 kg pigs that were treated with CPR after five minutes of no flow. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured at the descending thoracic aorta. Internal carotid artery blood flow (CBF) was measured with an ultrasound probe. Cerebral perfusion pressure (CerPP) was calculated in two ways (CerPPICAP and CerPPreported) using the same intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement. CePPreported was calculated as MAP-ICP. CerPPICAP was calculated by using intracranial arterial pressure (ICAP) – ICP. The animals were switched between head up (HUP) and supine (SUP) CPR every five minutes for a total of twenty minutes of resuscitation. ResultsMAP and coronary perfusion pressure measurements were similar in both CPR positions (p = 0.36 and p = 0.1, respectively). ICP was significantly lower in the HUP CPR group (14.7 ± 1 mm Hg vs 26.9 ± 1 mm Hg, p < 0.001) as was ICAP (30.1 ± 2 mm Hg vs 42.6 ± 1 mmHg, p < 0.001). The proportional decrease in ICP and ICAP resulted in similar CerPPICAP comparing HUP and SUPCPR (p = 0.7). CBF was significantly lower during HUPCPR when compared to SUPCPR (58.5 ± 3 ml/min vs 78 ± 4 ml/min, p < 0.001). A higher CerPPreported was found during the HUP compared to SUP-CPR, when MAP was used (36.6 ± 2 mm Hg vs 23 ± 2 mm Hg, p < 0.001) without correcting for the hydrostatic pressure drop. ConclusionHUP did not affect cerebral perfusion pressure and it significantly decreased internal carotid blood flow.

Early extracorporeal CPR for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest – A pre-planned per-protocol analysis of the INCEPTION-trial

BackgroundEvidence for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains inconclusive. Recently, the INCEPTION-trial, comparing extracorporeal with conventional CPR, found no statistically significant difference in neurologically favorable survival. Since protocol deviations were anticipated, a pre-specified per-protocol analysis was foreseen. MethodsThe per-protocol analysis of the INCEPTION trial excluded patients not meeting inclusion or exclusion criteria, amongst which time-to-cannulation of >60 minutes, and achieving a return of spontaneous circulation before hospital arrival. Crossovers were excluded as well. The primary outcome (30-day survival in a neurologically favorable condition; cerebral performance category [CPC] 1–2) was primarily analyzed under a frequentist statistical framework. In addition, Bayesian analysis under a minimally informative prior was performed. ResultsEighty-one patients were included in the per-protocol analysis (extracorporeal CPR n = 33, conventional CPR n = 48). Thirty-day survival with CPC1-2 was 15% in the extracorporeal CPR group versus 9% in the conventional CPR group (adjusted OR 1.9; 95% CI 0.4–9.3; p-value 0.393). Bayesian analysis showed an 84% posterior probability of any ECPR benefit and a 61% posterior probability of a 5% absolute risk reduction for the primary outcome. ConclusionA pre-planned, pre-specified per-protocol analysis of the INCEPTION-trial, found a higher survival with favorable neurological in patients undergoing ECPR versus CCPR for refractory shockable OHCA. This difference did not reach statistical significance, but results should be interpreted with care, in the light of the small remaining sample size.

Long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock according to the application and initiation time of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in South Korea.

Limited data are available regarding the proper application time and long-term outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with cardiogenic shock. This cohort study appraised the clinical outcomes according to ECMO application without or before cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) combined with cardiogenic shock. Between 2011 and 2015, a total of 13,104 patients with AMI were enrolled in a nationwide AMI registry. Eligible patients with cardiogenic shock, who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, with a 3-year clinical follow-up, were analyzed. The 949 included patients were divided into two groups: no ECMO (n = 845) and ECMO application (n = 104). The ECMO group was further divided into ECMO without or before CPR (n = 11) and ECMO after CPR (n = 93). Significant differences were noted in major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) between the no ECMO and ECMO application groups during the 3-year follow-up (41.5% vs. 80.8%; p < 0.001). However, the ECMO without or before CPR group showed similar outcomes to the no ECMO group in 3-year MACEs (63.6% vs. 41.5%; p = 0.055). MACEs during 3 years of follow-up were significantly lower in the ECMO without or before CPR group than in the ECMO after CPR group (63.6% vs. 82.8%; p = 0.005). A significantly lower risk of major cardiac events in ECMO without or before CPR suggests that early application of ECMO can be a reasonable strategy to improve outcomes in patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Traumatic injuries after manual and automatic mechanical compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, a retrospective cohort study

IntroductionChest compressions during advanced cardiac life support is a life-saving, potential harmful procedure with high incidence of severe and life-threatening injuries. Previous studies suggest a possible correlation between the increased incidence of chest and/or abdominal trauma and the use of automatic mechanical compression devices. MethodsAn observational monocentric retrospective cohort study was conducted including all patients admitted to our Intensive Care Unit suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in Canton Ticino (Switzerland) from 2012 to 2021. The primary endpoint was to describe any resuscitation-related body injury. The secondary endpoints were to explore possible predictors of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) related injuries and their association with the 30-day mortality. ResultsWe included 335 patients, 287 treated with manual chest compressions, 48 mechanically assisted. 55.5% of all resuscitated patients presented severe, or life-threatening lesions. Skeletal and thoracic injuries were the most frequent lesions followed by abdominal injuries. Mechanical assisted resuscitated patients presented higher risk of bleeding (OR 5.9; 95% CI 2.9–11.6) and increased CPR-related injuries (aOR 6.2; 95% CI 2.5–15.4) compared to standard manual chest compressions. In particular higher number of extra-thoracic and life-threatening lesions were described among the mechanical assisted CPR group. Patients with life-threatening had statistically significant higher mortality at 30-days compared to the severe and lesion’s free cohort. ConclusionTraumatic lesions occurred frequently after chest compression and their severity was associated with increased 30-day mortality. Mechanical devices, compared to manual chest compression, appear to be more harmful and may play a role in causing body lesions and hemorrhagic events.

Intensive Care Admissions and Outcome of Cardiac Arrests; A National Cohort Study From the United States.

Outcomes of cardiac arrest among patients who had cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in intensive care units (ICU) has limited data on the national level basis in the United States. We aimed to study the outcomes of ICU CPRs. Data from the national readmissions database (NRD) sample that constitutes 49.1% of the stratified sample of all hospitals in the United States were analyzed for ICU-related hospitalizations for the years 2016 to 2019. ICU CPR was defined by procedure codes. A total of 4,610,154 ICU encounters were reported for the years 2016 to 2019 in the NRD. Of these patients, 426,729 (9.26%) had CPR procedure recorded during the hospital encounter (mean age 65 ± 17.81; female 42.4%). And 167,597 (39.29%) patients had CPR on the day of admission, of which 63.16% died; while 64,752 (15.18%) patients had CPR on the day of ICU admission, of which 72.85% died. And 36,002 (8.44%) had CPR among patients with length of stay 2 days, of which 73.34% died. A total of 1,222,799 (26.5%) admitted to ICU died, and patients who had ICU CPR had higher mortality, 291,391(68.3%). Higher complication rates were observed among ICU CPR patients, especially who died. Over the years from 2016 to 2019, ICU CPR rates increased from 8.18% (2016) to 8.66% (2019); p-trend = 0.001. The mortality rates among patients admitted to ICU increased from 22.1% (2016) to 24.1% (2019); p-trend = 0.005. The majority of ICU CPRs were done on the first day of ICU admission. The trend for ICU CPR was increasing. The mortality trend for overall ICU admissions has increased, which is concerning and would suggest further research to improve the high mortality rates in the CPR group.

SULFORAPHANE ALLEVIATES POSTRESUSCITATION LUNG PYROPTOSIS POSSIBLY VIA ACTIVATING THE NRF2/HO-1 PATHWAY.

Introduction: Sulforaphane (SFN), known as the activator of the nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)/heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) pathway, has been proven to protect the lung against various pathological stimuli. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of SFN on lung injury induced by systemic ischemia reperfusion after cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Methods: After animal preparation, 24 pigs were randomly divided into sham group (n = 6), cardiopulmonary resuscitation group (CPR, n = 9), or CPR + SFN group (n = 9). The experimental model was then established by 10 min of cardiac arrest followed by 6 min of CPR. Once spontaneous circulation was achieved, a dose of 2 mg/kg of SFN diluted in 20 mL of saline was intravenously infused with a duration of 5 min. During 4 h of observation after resuscitation, extravascular lung water index (ELWI), pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI), and oxygenation index were regularly evaluated. At 24 h after resuscitation, lung tissues were harvested to evaluate the score of lung histopathological injury, the activity of superoxide dismutase, the contents of malondialdehyde, IL-1β, and IL-18, and the expression levels of NOD-like receptor pyrin domain 3, cleaved caspase 1, gasdermin D (GSDMD), GSDMD N-terminal, Nrf2, and HO-1. Results: During CPR, spontaneous circulation was achieved in six and seven pigs in the CPR and CPR + SFN groups, respectively. After resuscitation, the indicators of lung injury (ELWI, PVPI, and oxygenation index) were all better in the CPR + SFN group than in the CPR group, in which the differences in ELWI and PVPI at 2, and 4 h after resuscitation were significant between the two groups. In addition, SFN significantly reduced lung injury score, improved oxidative imbalance (superoxide dismutase, malondialdehyde), decreased pyroptosis-related proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-18), downregulated pyroptosis-related proteins (NOD-like receptor pyrin domain 3, cleaved caspase 1, GSDMD, GSDMD N-terminal), and activated the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway when compared with the CPR group. Conclusion: SFN produced effective postresuscitation lung protection through alleviating lung pyroptosis possibly via activating the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway in pigs.

Establishment of a Rat Model of Capillary Leakage Syndrome Induced by Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation After Cardiac Arrest.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) after cardiac arrest (CA) is one of the main causes of capillary leakage syndrome (CLS). This study aimed to establish a stable CLS model following the CA and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CA-CPR) model in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. We conducted a prospective, randomized, animal model study. All adult male SD rats were randomly divided into a normal group (group N), a sham operation group (group S), and a cardiopulmonary resuscitation group (group T). The SD rats of the three groups were all inserted with 24-G needles through their left femoral arteries and right femoral veins. In group S and group T, the endotracheal tube was intubated. In group T, CA induced by asphyxia (AACA) was caused by vecuronium bromide with the endotracheal tube obstructed for 8 min, and the rats were resuscitated with manual chest compression and mechanical ventilation. Preresuscitation and postresuscitation measurements, including basic vital signs (BVS), blood gas analysis (BG), routine complete blood count (CBC), wet-to-dry ratio of tissues (W/D), and the HE staining results after 6 h were evaluated. In group T, the success rate of the CA-CPR model was 60% (18/30), and CLS occurred in 26.6% (8/30) of the rats. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics, including BVS, BG, and CBC, among the three groups (P>0.05). Compared with pre-asphyxia, there were significant differences in BVS, CBC, and BG, including temperature, oxygen saturation (SpO2), mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), white blood cell count (WBC), hemoglobin, hematocrit, pH, pCO2, pO2, SO2, lactate (Lac), base excess (BE), and Na+ (P<0.05) after the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in group T. At 6 h after ROSC in group T and at 6 h after surgery in groups N and S, there were significant differences in temperature, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), SpO2, MAP, CVP, WBC, pH, pCO2, Na+, and K+ among the three groups (P<0.05). Compared with the other two groups, the rats in group T showed a significantly increased W/D weight ratio (P<0.05). The HE-stained sections showed consistent severe lesions in the lung, small intestine, and brain tissues of the rats at 6 h after ROSC following AACA. The CA-CPR model in SD rats induced by asphyxia could reproduce CLS with good stability and reproducibility.

Use of Mechanical Chest Compression for Resuscitation in Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest-Device Matters: A Propensity-Score-Based Match Analysis.

Devices for mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are recommended when high quality CPR cannot be provided. Different devices are available, but the literature is poor in direct comparison studies. Our aim was to assess whether the type of mechanical chest compressor could affect the probability of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and 30-day survival in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) patients as compared to manual standard CPR. We considered all OHCAs that occurred from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2022 in seven provinces of the Lombardy region equipped with three different types of mechanical compressor: Autopulse®(ZOLL Medical, MA), LUCAS® (Stryker, MI), and Easy Pulse® (Schiller, Switzerland). Two groups, 2146 patients each (manual and mechanical CPR), were identified by propensity-score-based random matching. The rates of ROSC (15% vs. 23%, p < 0.001) and 30-day survival (6% vs. 14%, p < 0.001) were lower in the mechanical CPR group. After correction for confounders, Autopulse® [OR 2.1, 95%CI (1.6-2.8), p < 0.001] and LUCAS® [OR 2.5, 95%CI (1.7-3.6), p < 0.001] significantly increased the probability of ROSC, and Autopulse® significantly increased the probability of 30-day survival compared to manual CPR [HR 0.9, 95%CI (0.8-0.9), p = 0.005]. Mechanical chest compressors could increase the rate of ROSC, especially in case of prolonged resuscitation. The devices were dissimilar, and their different performances could significantly influence patient outcomes. The load-distributing-band device was the only mechanical chest able to favorably affect 30-day survival.

Up to an Hour of Donor Resuscitation Does Not Affect Pediatric Heart Transplantation Survival

BackgroundIn pediatric heart transplantation, surgeons historically avoided donors requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), despite evidence that donor CPR does not change posttransplant survival (PTS). This study sought to determine whether CPR duration affects PTS. MethodsAll potential brain-dead donors aged <40 years from 2001 to 2021 consented for heart procurement were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing database (n = 54,671). Organ acceptance was compared by CPR administration and duration. All recipients aged <18 years with donor CPR data were then identified (n = 5680). Survival analyses were conducted using increasing CPR duration as a cut point to identify the shortest duration beyond which PTS worsened. Additional analyses were performed with multivariable and cubic spline regression. ResultsFifty-one percent of donors (28,012 of 54,671) received CPR. Donor acceptance was lower after CPR (54% vs 66%; P < .001) and across successive quartiles of CPR duration (P < .001). Of the transplant recipients, 48% (2753 of 5680) belonged to the no-CPR group, and 52% (2927 of 5680) belonged to the CPR group. Kaplan-Meier analyses of CPR duration attained significance at 55 minutes, after which PTS worsened (11.1 years vs 9.2 years; P = .025). There was no survival difference between the CPR ≤55 minutes group and the no-CPR group (11.1 years vs 11.2 years; P = .571). A cubic spline regression model confirmed that PTS worsened at more than 55 minutes of CPR. A Cox regression demonstrated that CPR >55 minutes predicted worsened PTS relative to no CPR (HR, 1.51; P = .007) but CPR ≤55 minutes did not (HR, 1.01; P = .864). ConclusionsDonor CPR decreases organ acceptance for transplantation; however, shorter durations (≤55 minutes) had equivalent PTS when controlling for other risk factors.

Association between bystander physical limitations, delays in chest compression during telecommunicator-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BackgroundPromptly initiated bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Many OHCA patients require repositioning to a firm surface. We examined the association between repositioning, chest compression (CC) delay, and patient outcomes. MethodsWe used a quality improvement registry from review of 9-1-1 dispatch audio recordings of OHCA among adults eligible for telecommunicator-assisted CPR (T-CPR) between 2013 and 2021. OHCA was categorized into 3 groups: CC not delayed, CC delayed due to bystander physical limitations to reposition the patient, or CC delayed for other (non-physical) reasons. The primary outcome was the repositioning interval, defined as the interval between the start of positioning instructions and CC onset. We used logistic regression to assess the odds ratio of survival according to CPR group, adjusting for potential confounders. ResultsOf the 3,482 OHCA patients eligible for T-CPR, CPR was not delayed in 1,223 (35%), delayed due to repositioning in 1,413 (41%), and delayed for other reasons in 846 (24%). The repositioning interval was longest for the physical limitation delay group (137 secs, IQR-148) compared to the other delay group (81 secs, IQR-70) and the no delay group (51 secs, IQR-32) (p < 0.001). Unadjusted survival was lowest in the physical limitation delay group (11%) versus the no delay (17%) and other delay (19%) groups and persisted after adjustment (p = 0.009). ConclusionBystander physical limitations are a common barrier to repositioning patients to begin CPR and are associated with lower likelihood of receiving CPR, longer times to begin CC, and lower survival.

The role of (18F)-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the surveillance of abnormal myocardial energy metabolism and cardiac dysfunction in a rat model of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

To investigate the feasibility and usefulness of 2-deoxy-2-(18F)-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography [(18F)-FDG PET/CT] as a novel examination in the surveillance of abnormal myocardial energy metabolism and cardiac dysfunction after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Thirteen male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into a sham group (n = 4), CPR group (n = 4), and trimetazidine (TMZ) + CPR group (n = 5). The expression levels of the myocardial injury marker cardiac troponin I (CTNI) in serum were tested at 6 hours after CPR or TMZ + CPR. The ejection fraction and fraction shortening were evaluated by echocardiography. (18F)-FDG PET/CT was used to measure the FDG uptake and the standardized uptake value (SUV) after CPR or TMZ + CPR for 6 hours. The intermediary carbohydrate metabolites of glycolysis including phosphoenolpyruvate, 3-phospho-D-glycerate, and the lactate/pyruvate ratio were detected through the multiple reaction monitoring approach. Simultaneously, the authors also tested the expression levels of the total adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and the key intermediate products of glucose ovidation as alpha ketoglutarate, citrate, and succinate in the myocardium. The authors found that the aerobic oxidation of glucose was reduced, and the anaerobic glycolysis was significantly enhanced in the myocardium in the early stage of CPR. Meanwhile, the myocardial injury marker CTNI was upregulated considerably (P = 0.014, P = 0.021), and the left ventricular function of the animal heart also markedly deteriorated with the downregulation of ATP after CPR. In contrast, myocardial injury and cardiac function were greatly improved with the increase of ATP in the CPR + TMZ group. In addition, aerobic glucose oxidation metabolites were significantly increased (P < 0.05) and anaerobic glycolysis metabolites were significantly decreased (P < 0.05) after CPR in the myocardium. Surprisingly, (18F)-FDG PET/CT could track the above changes by detecting the FDG uptake value and the SUV. Glucose metabolism is an essential factor for myocardial self-repair after CPR. (18F) FDG PET/CT, as a non-invasive technology, can monitor myocardial energy metabolism and cardiac function by tracking changes in glucose metabolism after CPR.

Compression-associated injuries using CLOVER3000 device in non-survivor patients of OHCA: A retrospective cohort study

AimThe incidence of compression-associated injuries from using the CLOVER3000, a new mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) device, is not well studied in the context of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Thus, we aimed to compare compression-associated injuries between CLOVER3000 and manual CPR. MethodsThis single-center, retrospective, cohort study used data from the medical records of a tertiary care center in Japan between April 2019 and August 2022. We included adult non-survivor patients with non-traumatic OHCA who were transported by emergency medical services and underwent post-mortem computed tomography. Compression-associated injuries were tested using logistic regression models adjusting for age, sex, bystander CPR performance, and CPR duration. ResultsA total of 189 patients (CLOVER3000, 42.3%; manual CPR, 57.7%) were included in the analysis. The overall incidence of compression-associated injuries was similar between the two groups (92.5% vs. 94.54%; adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 0.62 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.06–1.44]). The most common injury was anterolateral rib fractures with a similar incidence between the two groups (88.7% vs. 88.9%; AOR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.38 to 2.78]). The second most common injury was sternal fracture in both groups (53.1% vs. 56.7%; AOR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.36–1.30]). The incidence rates of other injuries were not statistically different between the both groups. ConclusionWe observed a similar overall incidence of compression-associated injuries between the CLOVER3000 and manual CPR groups on small sample size.