Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Attempts Research Articles

Relatives’ experiences of unsuccessful out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempts: a qualitative analysis

AimRelatives of patients who have experienced an out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) experience confusion and distress during resuscitation. Clear information from ambulance clinicians and the opportunity to witness the resuscitation helps them navigate the chaotic scene. However, UK-based evidence concerning relatives’ experiences of unsuccessful resuscitation attempts and interactions with ambulance clinicians is lacking. This qualitative study explores those experiences to inform ambulance clinician practice.MethodsTwo ambulance services in the UK identified OHCA events attended by their clinicians within the previous two weeks. After a minimum of three months relatives of non-survivors of these events were invited to participate in either a remote or face-to-face interview. Interviews focussed on their experiences of the resuscitation attempt and interactions with ambulance clinicians, their feelings at the time, and their reflections on the event afterwards. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.ResultsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 relatives of OHCA non-survivors. Thematic analysis identified four themes. Cardiac arrest is a traumatic event for relatives, with chaotic noisy scenes increasing their distress. Many described feelings symptomatic of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder since the event. During resuscitation, participants needed information from clinicians about what was happening, and provided information about their relatives’ wishes. Participants needed reassurance from clinicians that everything possible was done to save their relative and were reassured when they could witness some of the resuscitation. Participants were surprised how long resuscitation seemed to last; some were distressed that it lasted so long.ConclusionRelatives’ experiences highlight two key challenges for ambulance clinicians: (1) being aware of the tension relatives feel between needing reassurance that the crew is doing everything to save the patient and wanting to avoid prolonged and ultimately futile resuscitation attempts; and (2) having ongoing conversations with those present to inform clinical decision-making whilst managing the resuscitation attempt.

Pre-Hospital Care and Effect of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) On Survival Rate of Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) Victims, Telangana (India)

Introduction: OHCA is among the leading causes of mortality worldwide. India lacks a comprehensive database of cardiac arrests and an efficient emergency medical system. The treatment of cardiac disease has improved, yet the outcomes of OHCA remain poor. Methods: This is an observational 1-year prospective, single center, cohort study conducted on cohorts of OHCA victims. “Utstein Resuscitation Template” was followed for gathering the information starting location of arrest till the final resuscitation outcome. The information on OHCA patient treatment and current knowledge gaps is the aim of this study. Results: The study was conducted in the Warangal region of Telangana, India. The research comprised 1167 OHCA patients with a suspected cardiac etiology who were taken to the Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Hospital between June 1, 2022, and June 30, 2023. CPR attempts were recorded. Findings suggested if an individual was aware of the risk factors for CVD, they were more likely to report symptoms before OHCA. Conclusion: OHCA survival rate can be increased if the chain of survival is maintained by offering awareness and CPR training programs to the general public or bystanders, as well as efficient emergency ambulance services with qualified emergency medical staff.

Evaluating the Documentation of Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) among Older Adults Inpatients

Abstract Background Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can save a person’s life, but rate of success is low especially in older frail cohort. Attempted CPR is not without harm and many patients long for a natural dignified death. DNACPR orders provide a means by which decisions to withhold CPR & set ceilings of appropriate care in hospital can be recorded in advance of a potential cardiac event. Our department aims enhance the overall quality of end-of-life care for our patients. The objectives of this project were to evaluate the documentation around end-of-life care to support the introduction of a new DNACPR policy in September 2023. Methods A retrospective review of the deaths in the department for the period between July 2021 to July 2023 was undertaken. Thirty random charts from the deaths were examined, assessing the timing and quality of the DNACPR documentation and communication. A further random 30 charts of patients discharged alive were reviewed to assess any existing care plan for DNACPR. Results There were 202 deaths within the study period (mean age was 85, 114 (56%) male). Of the deaths examined, there were 50% male & mean age of 83. The average length of stay (LOS) was14.5 days. This was a dependent group with 56.7% having a clinical frailty score of >/= 6 and 43.4% having known dementia. DNACPR decisions and evidence of communication was documented in 29 patients (96.7%). Ceilings of care were documented in the majority. We also assessed 30 medical notes of community discharged patients (36.7% male, mean age 83, mean LOS 13.86). Pneumonia (33%) was the most common diagnosis. Only 13.3% had DNACPR and ceiling of care documentation. Conclusion Recognition of dying seems good in the department with room for improvement in broader advanced care discussions. Further training on end-of-life conversations is planned with regular simulation sessions.

Treatment Escalation Plans: A Snapshot Review on Acute Medical Wards

Abstract Background In medical care, Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNA CPR) orders serve as vital tools in determining whether CPR should be administered to patients, particularly those with progressive life-limiting illnesses or approaching the end of life. Failure to make timely and appropriate CPR-related decisions and treatment escalation plans can lead to the risk of administering futile or inappropriate treatments. Methods Admission booklets in our centre prompt clinicians to indicate whether a patient was for CPR or not as part of the admission process, with further instructions to fill out a DNA CPR form if applicable. We conducted a chart review on acute medical wards to assess the frequency and adequacy of DNA CPR decision-making and communication. Data was collected by three investigators on a structured proforma and anonymised. Data analysis was conducted using Excel. Results Data was collected on 67 patients, with a mean age of 76.6. Of those 67, only six had CPR status indicated on admission, with five specified for resuscitation and one not for resuscitation. A total of 14 patients went on to have DNA CPR forms filled out during admission, but in only five cases were these decisions discussed with the patients themselves. The main reasons for lack of patient involvement in the discussions included confusion and cognitive impairment. Documentation regarding discussions with next of kin was present in eight cases. Conclusion Our snapshot review underscores the importance of early discussions regarding treatment escalation plans and DNA CPR decisions. Our findings reveal that these discussions are not occurring as frequently as advised, and when decisions are made, they are not adequately communicated with patients or those close to them. There is an urgent need for further training on the legal aspects and ethical considerations surrounding DNA CPR decisions to ensure better patient-centered care and decision-making.

Improving Advanced Care Planning: Documentation of DNA CPR Orders and TEPs in Residential Care Admissions

Abstract Background Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNA CPR) orders and Treatment Escalation Plans (TEPs) are key components of advanced care planning for managing patients with progressive life-limiting illnesses and significant frailty. Our study aimed to determine the proportion of such patients being transferred from residential care facilities with documented TEPs upon medical admission, examine whether these TEPs were revised during the hospital stay, and assess patient outcomes at 14 days post-presentation. Methods We reviewed the lists of patients who had been referred for medical admission via the emergency department over a one-month period and identified those presenting from residential care facilities. We excluded those under the age of 65. We reviewed relevant medical notes and collected anonymised data into an Excel spreadsheet on a password protected computer. Results We identified 34 patient’s relevant patients. Notes were available for review in 31 cases (17 male; age range 66 to 96 years old, mean age 82.3). Of the 31 cases reviewed, the mean Clinical Frailty Score was 7.4. Residential care facilities sent documentation outlining TEPs in 19/31 cases. In those cases, 4/19 specified full resuscitation. In 3/4 of these cases, the TEP was revised during their admission. In one case, documentation specified that the patient did not want to be transferred to hospital under any circumstances. A total of 14 patients had no documentation regarding TEP. Of those, 7/14 went on to have DNA CPR orders filled out during their admission. At 14 days post presentation, 7 had died in hospital, 16 were discharged back to their residential care facility, and the remainder remained inpatient. Conclusion These findings underscore the need for better advance care planning, potentially improving patient management and reducing the emotional burden on patients, healthcare providers and families during critical moments.

Coaching doctors to improve ethical decision-making in adult hospitalized patients potentially receiving excessive treatment. The CODE stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.

The aim of this study was to assess whether coaching doctors to enhance ethical decision-making in teams improves (1) goal-oriented care operationalized via written do-not-intubate and do-not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNI-DNACPR) orders in adult patients potentially receiving excessive treatment (PET) during their first hospital stay and (2) the quality of the ethical climate. We carried out a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) and 9 referring internal medicine departments of Ghent University Hospital between February 2022 and February 2023. Doctors and nurses in charge of hospitalized patients filled out the ethical decision-making climate questionnaire (ethical decision-making climate questionnaire, EDMCQ) before and after the study, and anonymously identified PET via an electronic alert during the entire study period. All departments were randomly assigned to a 4-month coaching. At least one month of coaching was compared to less than one month coaching and usual care. The first primary endpoint was the incidence of written DNI-DNACPR decisions. The second primary endpoint was the EDMCQ before and after the study period.Because clinicians identified less PET than required to detect a difference in written DNI-DNACPR decisions, a post-hoc analysis on the overall population was performed. To reduce type I errors, we further restricted the analysis to one of our predefined secondary endpoints (mortality up to 1year). Of the 442 and 423 clinicians working before and after the study period, respectively 270 (61%) and 261 (61.7%) filled out the EDMCQ. Fifty of the 93 (53.7%) doctors participated in the coaching for a mean (standard deviation [SD]) of 4.36 (2.55) sessions. Of the 7254 patients, 125 (1.7%) were identified as PET, with 16 missing outcome data. Twenty-six of the PET and 624 of the overall population already had a written DNI-DNACPR decision at study entry, resulting in 83 and 6614 patients who were included in the main and post hoc analysis, respectively. The estimated incidence of written DNI-DNACPR decisions in the intervention vs. control arm was, respectively, 29.7% vs. 19.6% (odds ratio 4.24, 95% confidence interval 4.21-4.27; P < 0.001) in PET and 3.4% vs. 1.9% (1.65, 1.12-2.43; P = 0.011) in the overall study population. The estimated mortality at one year was respectively 85% vs. 83.7% (hazard ratio 2.76, 1.26-6.04; P = 0.011) and 14.5% vs. 15.1% (0.89, 0.72-1.09; P = 0.251). The mean difference in EDMCQ before and after the study period was 0.02 points (- 0.18 to 0.23; P = 0.815). This study suggests that coaching doctors regarding ethical decision-making in teams safely improves goal-oriented care operationalized via written DNI-DNACPR decisions in hospitalized patients, however without concomitantly improving the quality of the ethical climate.

The application of Borg scale in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: An integrative review.

The study of human performance and perception of exertion constitutes a fundamental aspect for monitoring health implications and enhancing training outcomes such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). It involves gaining insights into the varied responses and tolerance levels exhibited by individuals engaging in physical activities. To measure perception of exertion, many tools are available, including the Borg scale. In order to evaluate how the Borg scale is being used during CPR attempts, this integrative review was carried out between October/2020 and December/2023, with searches from PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO and VHL. Full publications relevant to the PICO strategy were included and letters, editorials, abstracts, and unpublished studies were excluded. In total, 34 articles were selected and categorised into three themes: a) CPR performed in different contexts; b) CPR performed in different cycles, positions, and techniques; c) CPR performed with additional technological resources. Because CPR performance is considered a strenuous physical activity, the Borg scale was used in each study to evaluate perception of exertion. The results identified that the Borg scale has been used during CPR in different contexts. It is a quick, low-cost, and easy-to-apply tool that provides important indicators that may affect CPR quality, such as perception of exertion, likely improving performance and potentially increasing the chances of survival.

Paramedic utility in screening patients who present to Emergency Medical Services and who may benefit from an Advance Care Plan: A mixed methods study with explanatory sequential design

We used a two-phased mixed methods study with an explanatory sequential design to understand how frequently paramedics attend patients who, on paramedic assessment with the Gold Standards Framework Proactive Identification Guidance, are end-of-life and have advance care planning. We subsequently explored paramedic views on paramedic screening of patients to assess if they are end-of-life and onward referral to their General Practitioner for advance care planning. Paramedics screened and recorded 14.9% of patients as end-of-life and 44.3% of these patients were assessed to have no advance care plan in place. When paramedics screened patients and they did have an advance care plan in place, 36.8% had only a Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Paramedics found using the Gold Standards Framework Proactive Identification Guidance to screen patients for end-of-life status useful and straightforward and considered themselves well-placed to complete this task. Future research is required to address the practicalities of implementing a paramedic screening and referral tool for end-of-life care that results in the intended outcome of supporting effective advance care planning.

Does a Transition to Single-Occupancy Patient Rooms Affect the Incidence and Outcome of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrests?

It is proposed that patients in single-occupancy patient rooms (SPRs) carry a risk of less surveillance by nursing and medical staff and that resuscitation teams need longer to arrive in case of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). Higher incidences of IHCA and worse outcomes after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be the result. Our study examines whether there is a difference in incidence and outcomes of IHCA before and after the transition from a hospital with multibedded rooms to solely SPRs. In this prospective observational study in a Dutch university hospital, as a part of the Resuscitation Outcomes in the Netherlands study, we reviewed all cases of IHCA on general adult wards in a period of 16.5 months before to 16.5 months after the transition to SPRs. During the study period, 102 CPR attempts were performed: 51 in the former hospital and 51 in the new hospital. Median time between last-seen-well and start basic life support did not differ significantly, nor did median time to arrival of the CPR team. Survival rates to hospital discharge were 30.0% versus 29.4% of resuscitated patients (p = 1.00), with comparable neurological outcomes: 86.7% of discharged patients in the new hospital had Cerebral Performance Category 1 (good cerebral performance) versus 46.7% in the former hospital (p = .067). When corrected for telemetry monitoring, these differences were still nonsignificant. The transition to a 100% SPR hospital had no negative impact on incidence, survival rates, and neurological outcomes of IHCAs on general adult wards.

1743 Frailty is associated with poor cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes in the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract Background This study aims to investigate the relationship between frailty and in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) outcomes in the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods The study was carried out in a tertiary hospital in Scotland and included all patients over the age of 18 who had an in-hospital CPR attempt between April 2020 and March 2022. Patients were identified via the pre-existing National Cardiac Arrest Audit Database which was collected prospectively. Data collected from this included age, sex, initial arrest rhythm, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and in-hospital mortality. The electronic and paper patient notes were retrospectively reviewed to calculate a Rockwood clinical frailty scale (CFS) and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). The data was stratified in to frail (CFS ≥5) and non-frail (CFS &amp;lt;5) groups. Results 65 patients were included in the study. In univariate analysis, there was a significant difference between the frail and non-frail groups in age (p=0.006), ROSC (p=0.02) and survival to discharge (p=0.004). Only 10 out of 34 (29.4%) frail patients had ROSC and of those only 3 (8.8%) survived to discharge compared to 12 out of 31 (35.3%) of non-frail patients. In a binary logistic regression, there was a significant association between frailty and both ROSC (adjusted OR 3.31 [95% CI: 1.12-9.78}) and survival to discharge (adjusted OR 6.33 [95% CI: 1.48-27.13]) and no significant association with age, CCI or sex. Conclusion The findings support the relationship between frailty and poor CPR outcomes independent of age and co-morbidity during the COVID-19 pandemic.

GPs' views on emergency care treatment plans: an online survey.

A holistic approach to emergency care treatment planning is needed to ensure that patients' preferences are considered should their clinical condition deteriorate. To address this, emergency care and treatment plans (ECTPs) have been introduced. Little is known about their use in general practice. To find out GPs' experiences of, and views on, using ECTPs. Online survey of GPs practising in England. A total of 841 GPs were surveyed using the monthly online survey provided by medeConnect, a market research company. Forty-one per cent of responders' practices used Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) plans for ECTP, 8% used other ECTPs, and 51% used Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) forms. GPs were the predominant professional group completing ECTPs in the community. There was broad support for a wider range of community-based health and social care professionals being able to complete ECTPs. There was no system for reviewing ECTPs in 20% of responders' practices. When compared with using a DNACPR form, GPs using a ReSPECT form for ECTP were more comfortable having conversations about emergency care treatment with patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1 to 2.69) and family members (OR =1.85, 95% CI = 1.19 to 2.87). The potential benefits and challenges of widening the pool of health and social care professionals initiating and/or completing the ECTP process needs consideration. ReSPECT plans appear to make GPs more comfortable with ECTP discussions, supporting their implementation. Practice-based systems for reviewing ECTP decisions should be strengthened.

Intensive care following in-hospital cardiac arrest / periarrest calls—experience from one Scottish hospital

BackgroundIn-hospital cardiac arrest/periarrest is a recognised trigger for consideration of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to investigate the rates of ICU admission following in-hospital cardiac arrest/periarrest, evaluate the outcomes of such patients and assess whether anticipatory care planning had taken place prior to the adult resuscitation team being called.MethodsAnalysis of all referrals to the ICU page-holder within our district general hospital is between 1st November 2018 and 31st May 2019. From this, the frequency of adult resuscitation team calls was determined. Case notes were then reviewed to determine details of the events, patient outcomes and the use of anticipatory care planning tools on wards.ResultsOf the 506 referrals to the ICU page-holder, 141 (27.9%) were adult resuscitation team calls (114 periarrests and 27 cardiac arrests). Twelve patients were excluded due to health records being unavailable. Admission rates to ICU were low — 17.4% for cardiac arrests (4/23 patients), 5.7% (6/106) following periarrest. The primary reason for not admitting to ICU was patients being “too well” at the time of review (78/129 — 60.5%). Prior to adult resuscitation team call, treatment escalation plans had been completed in 27.9% (36/129) with Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) forms present in 15.5% of cases (20/129). Four cardiac arrest calls were made in the presence of a valid DNACPR form, frequently due to a lack of awareness of the patient’s resuscitation status.ConclusionsThis study highlights the significant workload for the ICU page-holder brought about by adult resuscitation team calls. There is a low admission rate from these calls, and, at the time of resuscitation team call, anticipatory planning is frequently either incomplete or poorly communicated. Addressing these issues requires a collaborative approach between ICU and non-ICU physicians and highlights the need for larger studies to develop scoring systems to aid objective admission decision-making.

Family Medicine Residents' Knowledge and Attitudes About End-of-Life Care in Taif City, Saudi Arabia.

Background End-of-life care is essential for individuals with advanced illness and their families, providing comfort, symptom control, and dignity in the final year of life. Additionally, physician competence requires the ability to communicate, make decisions, and create relationships in end-of-life care. This study assesses family physicians' knowledge and attitude regarding end-of-life care in Taif, Saudi Arabia. Methods Thisdescriptive cross-sectional study conducted between October and November 2021 assessed the knowledge and attitudes of 163 family physicians in Taif City, Saudi Arabia, regarding end-of-life care. Using a convenient sampling technique, an adapted and validated questionnaire was administered electronically, collecting sociodemographic information and assessing participants' knowledge and attitudes. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics in Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 28) (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY). Results Findings included that 41.1% of residents believed the patient and family should be informed about diagnoses and prognoses in advanced diseases. At the same time, attitudes varied, with 45.4% agreeing that discussing such information could lead to patient depression and 42.9% believing it held no privilege for patients. Additionally, 57.7% recognized that grief reactions would occur, but patients would eventually adjust, and 44.8% agreed that discussing diagnoses would decrease patient anxiety. However, limited awareness of advance directives was evident, with 12.3% reporting being well aware and 45.4% having never heard of them. There was uncertainty and hesitancy regarding Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions, with 39.9% being well aware and 46% having heard of it without a strong understanding. Conclusion The findings revealed a mixed landscape, with physicians demonstrating awareness of the importance of transparent communication but needing more knowledge in areas such as advance directives and complex decision-making. The study highlighted the need for targeted education to address these gaps and promote a more informed and consistent approach to end-of-life care.

77 Introducing a Do Not Attempt Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) and treatment escalation plan (TEP) guideline in an acute hospital.

Abstract Background In hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation has a 13–20% survival rate to hospital discharge. Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) orders reduce resuscitation activity in people who are unlikely to survive due to underlying co-morbidities. The project aimed to identify current DNACPR practice and cardiac arrest calls in an acute care hospital and to improve communicating and documentation of DNACPR decisions. Methods A baseline audit of 20 medical charts identified variable practice on documenting DNACPR, inappropriate cardiac arrest calls and poor communication between the multidisciplinary team and patients on DNACPR decisions. A sub-committee of Medical Clinical Governance developed a hospital wide Guideline and Proforma for DNACPR that included a treatment escalation plan (TEP). Using quality improvement methodology and plan-do-study-act cycles the DNACPR proforma and decision support framework was refined and tested. Implementation strategies included stakeholder engagement, education, re-formatting documentation and recruitment of ward champions over a six month period. Post implementation audit measured compliance with completing the proforma and resuscitation calls. Results Clinical audit in February 2023 of 33 patient medical records identified 100% (n = 33) of patients with a DNACPR decision had the correct form in use. 96% documented communication with patients. All proformas were signed by a senior decision maker, included a TEP and were filed correctly in the patients notes. There was a 25% reduction in cardiac arrest calls. Only 56% of proformas were signed by nursing staff. Conclusion Implementing a standardised DNACPR proforma was feasible and improved documentation, visibility and ease of locating DNACPR decisions. It promoted timely communication with patients and families setting realistic goals of care in the TEP. In turn there has been a reduction in cardiac arrest calls. Nurses role in the process remains sub-optimal and there is a need to understand the experience of patients and families.

A fatal case of paediatric post-traumatic pyomyositis.

A 6-year-old girl was brought to the emergency department with a history of an accidental fall a few days earlier. She presented with a fever, cough and constipation. Sars-CoV-2 infection being suspected, she was transferred to a paediatric facility for Covid-positive patients. During the diagnostic process, the clinical picture suddenly deteriorated with the development of bradycardia, tachypnea and altered sensorium. Despite cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempts, the child died about 16 hours after admission to the emergency department. A judicial forensic autopsy was performed that concluded that her death was due to multiple acute pulmonary, cardiac and renal infarctions secondary to septic thromboembolism in the course of post-traumatic bacterial necrotizing pyomyositis of the right ileo-psoas muscle.

'That's as hard a decision as you will ever have to make': the experiences of people who discussed Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on behalf of a relative during the COVID-19 pandemic.

COVID-19 brought additional challenges to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decision-making, which was already a contentious issue. In the UK, reports of poor DNACPR decision-making and communication emerged in 2020, including from the regulator, the Care Quality Commission. This paper explores the experiences of people who discussed DNACPR with a healthcare professional on behalf of a relative during the coronavirus pandemic, with the aim of identifying areas of good practice and what needs to be improved. a total of 39 people participated in semi-structured interviews via video conferencing software or telephone. Data were evaluated using Framework Analysis. results are presented around three main themes: understanding, communication and impact. Participants' understanding about DNACPR was important, as those with better understanding tended to reflect more positively on their discussions with clinicians. The role of relatives in the decision-making process was a frequent source of misunderstanding. Healthcare professionals' communication skills were important. Where discussions went well, relatives were given clear explanations and the opportunity to ask questions. However many relatives felt that conversations were rushed. DNACPR discussions can have a lasting impact-relatives reported them to be significant moments in care journeys. Many relatives perceived that they were asked to decide whether their relative should receive CPR and described enduring emotional consequences, including guilt. the pandemic has illuminated deficiencies in current practice around DNACPR discussion, which can have difficult to anticipate and lasting negative consequences for relatives. This research raises questions about the current approach to DNACPR decision-making.

Should AEDs Become More Common in Nursing Homes?

Automated external defibrillators, or AEDs, to manage cardiac arrest have become standard in many community settings. This was evident when first responders had to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and use an AED on Buffalo Bills safety Damar Hamlin, who went into cardiac arrest on the football field in January. By contrast, AEDs are not standard in nursing homes. Nursing facilities that participate in Medicare and Medicaid must be able to provide basic life support (BLS), including CPR, in emergency situations, but they are not required to have AEDs on-site, and the extent of AED use is unknown. It may be time to re-evaluate CPR procedures among residents, says Rebecca Elon, MD, MPH, CMD, an associate professor at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Previously, studies suggested that performing CPR on nursing home residents who experience cardiac arrest is futile, given that the likelihood of survival lessens as individuals age. One study, for instance, found that over a 13-year period, survival 30 days after CPR was performed was 6.7% among individuals aged 70 to 79, dropping to 4.4% among those aged 80 to 89 and 2.4% among those aged 90 and older (Resuscitation 2015;94:28–32). Studies also have found poorer outcomes in individuals who have comorbidities, even when an AED was used. However, Dr. Elon points out, many of those studies are more than a decade old. The most recent study dates to 2006, and none of the individuals in that study received CPR with an AED. Indeed, in four U.S. cities only 6.7% of nursing homes had AEDs, and 10% had manual defibrillators, as reported by another study that same year (J Am Med Direc Assoc 2006;7:413–415). When cardiac arrest occurs, the rate of survival diminishes by about 10% for every minute between the arrest and initiation of CPR, and the risk of prolonged brain damage increases due to cerebral hypoxia. However, recent studies have shown that outcomes have improved when someone witnesses the cardiac arrest and performs CPR using an AED. For example, a 2018 study in Denmark found that between 2001 and 2014, the overall survival in a limited cohort went from 1.7% to 7.7% when a bystander witnessed the cardiac arrest, performed CPR, and used an AED while awaiting emergency medical services (Resuscitation 2018;125:90–98). A German study of nursing facilities in 2020 found that among 2,900 CPR attempts over a seven-year period, only 118 patients (4.4%) were alive when they later left the hospital; 64 of those individuals (2.2% of the total) had a favorable cerebral performance (Dtsch Arztebl Int 2020;117:757–763). The researchers also found that in 64% of those cases the nursing staff did not attempt to resuscitate the resident but instead waited for the arrival of emergency personnel. Besides clinical outcomes, there are other considerations when deciding whether AEDs should be standard in nursing homes, such as staff time, especially considering shortages, and cost effectiveness. “Despite these various potential concerns, providing AEDs for nursing facility staff to utilize in the BLS/CPR protocols might prove to be an important quality-improvement intervention and risk-management tool for nursing facilities,” Dr. Elon writes. Source: Elon RD. Cardiac Resuscitation Procedures in US Nursing Facilities: Time to Reevaluate the Standard of Care? [published online: February 28, 2023]. J Am Med Dir Assoc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2023.01.029. Jeffrey S. Eisenberg, a freelance writer in the Philadelphia area, compiled this listing.

Cardiac Resuscitation Procedures in US Nursing Facilities: Time to Reevaluate the Standard of Care?

Although the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) response has become the standard of care in many community settings over the past 20+ years, the adoption of AEDs in US nursing facilities is variable and the current number of facilities with AEDs is unknown. Recent research into the use of AEDs as part of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) procedures for nursing facility residents with sudden cardiac arrest demonstrates improved outcomes in the limited cohort with witnessed arrests, early bystander CPR, and an initial amenable rhythm, shocked with an AED before the arrival of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel. This article reviews data about outcomes of CPR in older adults and nursing facility settings and proposes that standard procedures for CPR attempts in US nursing facilities should be reevaluated and continue to evolve, commensurate with the evidence and community standards.

Managing DNACPR Recommendations in Residential Care: Towards Improved Training for Social Care and Capacity Professionals

Abstract The use of ‘Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation’ (DNACPR) recommendations has come under scrutiny during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Care Quality Commission (CQC) has issued a call for new standards, guidance and training. One group for whom new training is required is ‘capacity professionals’ working in and with residential care facilities. These professionals (including Independent Mental Capacity Advocates and Best Interests Assessors) typically have a social work background and have specialist training regarding the 2005 Mental Capacity Act, the provisions of which have a direct relevance to DNACPR recommendations. We report on a survey and focus groups that probed the experiences of this professional group during the pandemic. We recruited 262 participants by approaching civil society organisations in which capacity professionals are well represented; twenty-two participated in follow-on focus groups. We used manifest content analysis and descriptive statistics to analyse the results. Our findings contribute to an emerging picture of what transpired in residential care homes during the first year of the pandemic and help to provide an empirical and normative basis for the development of the new guidance and training for which the CQC has called.

The success rate of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and its correlated factors in patients with emergency prehospital cardiac arrest

ABSTRACT To assess the initial success rate and its correlated factors on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in emergency prehospital cardiac arrest patients. The clinical information of 429 patients with cardiac arrest who underwent prehospital CPR in the fourth hospital of Hebei Medical University from Jan 2020 to Apr 2022 were evaluated. The patients were divided into the successful group (ROSC, n = 25) and the unsuccessful group (non-ROSC, n = 404) according to whether the autonomous circulation (ROSC) was resumed. The univariate analysis was performed to evaluate the differences in age, the start time of CPR, the application of electric defibrillation, and other related data between the two groups. The multivariate analysis evaluated protective factors affecting CPR’s success in prehospital cardiac arrest patients. Patients with cardiogenic causes had the highest success rate of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The causes of traffic accidents and drowning account for a low proportion. Furthermore, the median CPR length was 25.0 min, alternating from 1.5 to 64 mi. The univariate analysis revealed that age, the start time of CPR, application of electric defibrillation, and adrenaline dosage were correlated with CPR attempts (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the age of patients with prehospital CA, the location of prehospital CA, etiology, bystander CPR, CPR start time, defibrillation start time, tracheal intubation time, type of rhythm before resuscitation, adrenaline dosage <5 mg, and adrenaline administration time were all the influencing factors of prehospital CPR success (p < 0.01). The factors affecting CPR’s success rate in prehospital CA patients are complicated. Establishing a few procedures to diminish the incidence of these risk factors is crucial.