Cardio-oncology Research Articles

Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity in females with breast cancer

BackgroundCancer and cardiovascular diseases are the main causes of mortality worldwide. Although the incidence of cancer is rising, modern comprehensive management including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy led to decreased mortality, but also different cardiovascular complications. Conventional EF measurement fails to detect subtle changes in LV function, so a more sensitive tool is needed.MethodsThe study included 101 asymptomatic female patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer who received anthracycline ± trastuzumab-based chemotherapy regimen. A comprehensive echocardiographic examination was performed before receiving the chemotherapy (T0), at 3 months (T1), and at 6 months after (T2). All patients had pre-treatment normal LV EF. Asymptomatic CTRCD is defined as: severe if new LVEF reduction to < 40%, moderate if new LVEF reduction by ≥ 10 percentage points to an LVEF of 40–49% or new LVEF reduction by, 10 percentage points to an LVEF of 40– 49% and either new relative decline in GLS by .15% from baseline or new rise in cardiac biomarkers and mild if LVEF ≥ 50% and new relative decline in GLS by .15% from baseline and/or new rise in cardiac biomarkers. Symptomatic CTRCD is defined as: very severe if HF requiring inotropic support, mechanical circulatory support, or consideration of transplantation, severe if required hospitalization, moderate if required outpatient intensification of diuretic and HF therapy and mild if there are mild HF symptoms and no intensification of therapy required according to the latest ESC cardio oncology guidelines. The Lower reference value set for RV S’ was less than 10cm/s to define RV systolic dysfunction according to ASE guidelines.ResultsCTRCD occurred in 24 patients (25.5%) while RV systolic dysfunction was more common occurring in 37 patients (39.4%). LV GLS at (T1) (cut-off value < -15% with relative 12.5% reduction from the baseline value) was a strong predictor of CTRCD, but combining LV GLS with RV GLS & RV FWLS was the strongest (AUC = 0.947, sensitivity = 91.67%, specificity = 90%).ConclusionChemotherapy induces biventricular changes with more prevalent deterioration in RV values. Low LV & RV strain values at baseline together with reduction of these values after chemotherapy treatment can predict later CTRCD development. Combining LV GLS with RV GLS & FWLS values at (T1) is the strongest predictor of subsequent CTRCD.

Using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) to guide implementation of cardio-oncology services.

Cardio-oncology focuses on diagnosing and preventing adverse cardiovascular outcomes in cancer patients. Interdisciplinary cardio-oncology services address the spectrum of prevention, detection, monitoring, and treatment of cancer patients at risk of cardio-toxicity and aim to improve the continuum of cardiac care for oncology patients. The goal of this study was to engage clinician and administrative stakeholders to assess multilevel needs, barriers, and expectations regarding cardio oncology services. We interviewed clinicians and administrators at an academic medical center using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to understand multilevel determinants influencing cardio-oncology service implementation. We also conducted a web-based survey to assess the knowledge, attitude, and perceptions of cardio-oncology services held by local and regional clinicians who may refer cardio-oncology patients to the study site. Multiple facilitators to cardio-oncology service implementation emerged. Interview participants believed cardio-oncology services could benefit patients and the organization by providing a competitive advantage. A majority (74%) of clinicians surveyed thought a cardio-oncology service would significantly improve cancer patients' prognoses. Implementation barriers discussed included costs and a siloed organizational structure that complicated cross-service collaboration. In the clinician survey, differences in the views toward cardio-oncology services held by cardiology versus oncology providers would need to be negotiated in future cardio-oncology service development. For example, while most providers accepted similar risk of cardio-toxicity when consenting patients for cancer therapy in a curative setting, cardiologists accepted significantly higher levels of risk than oncologists in an incurable setting: 75% of oncologists accepted 1-5% risk; 77% of cardiologists accepted ≥5% risk). Participants supported implementation and development of cardio-oncology services. Respondents also noted multi-level barriers that could be addressed to maximize the potential for success. Engaging administrators and clinicians from cardiology and oncology disciplines in the future development of such services can help ensure maximal relevance and uptake.

Lessons learnt in the first year of an Australian pediatric cardio oncology clinic

BackgroundModern oncological therapies together with chemotherapy and radiotherapy have broadened the agents that can cause cardiac sequelae, which can manifest for pediatric oncology patients while on active treatment. Recommendations for high-risk patients who should be monitored in a pediatric cardio-oncology clinic have previously been developed by expert Delphi consensus by our group. In 2022 we opened our first multidisciplinary pediatric cardio-oncology clinic adhering to these recommendations in surveillance and management.ObjectivesOur pediatric cardio-oncology clinic aimed to:(i) Document cardiovascular toxicities observed within a pediatric cardio-oncology clinic and.(ii) Evaluate the applicability of the Australian and New Zealand Pediatric Cardio-Oncology recommendations.Methods Monthly multidisciplinary cardio-oncology clinics were conducted in an Australian tertiary pediatric hospital. Structured standardised approaches to assessment were built into the electronic medical record (EMR). All patients underwent baseline echocardiogram and electrocardiogram assessment together with vital signs in conjunction with standard history and examination.ResultsNineteen (54%) individuals had a documented cardiovascular toxicity or pre-existing risk factor prior to referral. The two most common cardiovascular toxicities documented during clinic review included Left Ventricular Dysfunction (LVD) and hypertension. Of note 3 (8.1%) patients had CTCAE grade III LVD. An additional 10 (27%) patients reviewed in clinic had CTCAE grade I hypertension. None of these patients had hypertension noted within their referral. Cascade testing for cardiac history was warranted in 2 (5.4%) of patients.ConclusionsPediatric cardio-oncology clinics are likely beneficial to documenting previously unrecognised cardiotoxicity and relevant cardiac family histories, whilst providing an opportunity to address lifestyle risk factors.

A peek into Malaysian Cardio oncology data – The New Kid on The Block- Single Centre experience of 10-year analysis of Neoplastic Pericardial Effusion requiring Pericardiocentensis

A peek into Malaysian Cardio oncology data – The New Kid on The Block- Single Centre experience of 10-year analysis of Neoplastic Pericardial Effusion requiring Pericardiocentensis

Differences in the prevalence of cardiovascular toxicity in a cohort of female breast cancer patients according to the different cardiotoxicity definitions

Abstract Background The definition of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) has evolved in the past ten years, as Cardio Oncology has consolidated as a new medical discipline. However, great heterogeneity is noted among the published criteria of the different types of cardiotoxicities by the different scientific societies. In order to mitigate this variability, a new definition of CTRCD has been recently proposed by the International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS) and endorsed by the latest 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardio-oncology. CTRCD is now classified into different degrees of severity according to symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) reduction guided by echocardiography and elevation of cardiac biomarkers. Purpose we aimed to assess the impact of the new consensus definition of CTRCD in the reclassification of cardiotoxicity in a breast cancer cohort of female patients receiving potentially cardiotoxic therapies (CT) attended in our third-level hospital. Methods we retrospectively analyzed and compared the incidence of the different subtypes of CTRCD in a cohort of female breast cancer patients evaluated in our hospital from 2018 to 2021 according to both the previous 2016 ESC Position Paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity and the latest 2021 ICOS definition. Results a cohort of 193 women with a breast cancer diagnosis and receiving CT was analyzed. Mean age was 58 ± 11 years and 57 % of the patients (110) had a least one cardiovascular risk factor, with no past history of cardiac disease. According to the previous ESC 2016 criteria, 16 patients (8.3%) had cardiac dysfunction associated with cancer treatment whereas with the 2021 IC-OS new definition, a total of 23 women (12%) would have been satisfied the CTRCD criteria. Of Those, 11 were asymptomatic and 7 had severe CTRCD. Overall, this would have translated into a 30% rise in the incidence of patients experiencing any type of cardiotoxicty (p &amp;lt; 0.0001). Conclusion(s) by using the new IC-OS criteria for CTRCD, a significant increase in the prevalence of cardiotoxicity was noted in our population, which may translate the higher sensitivity of the proposed criteria to detect clinical or subclinical cardiovascular damage derived from cancer treatment.

Abstract 18300: Do Current Cardiovascular Risk Models Predict the Development of Cardiotoxicity in Lymphoma Patients Treated With Anthracycline?

Introduction: Assessing baseline cardiovascular (CV) risk factors is crucial for identifying cancer patients at higher risk of cardiotoxicity (CT). While both CT specific scores, including Heart Failure Association-International Cardio Oncology Society (HFA-ICOS) and our institutional score, as well as general CV scores like Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), have been used to assess CT risk; in lymphoma patients undergoing anthracycline therapy, their utility remains unknown. Aim: Evaluate the performance of each risk score to predict CT in a cohort of newly diagnosed lymphoma patients undergoing anthracycline treatment, followed for a median of 5.4 years. Methods: 326 Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated and followed from 2013 to 2021 were prospectively assessed. Baseline measurements of the three risk scores were obtained. ASCVD score was not assessed in patients &gt;80 or &lt;40 years old or without baseline cholesterol. CT was defined during or after one year of chemotherapy as severe, moderate, or mild according to 2022 ESC guidelines. Logistic regression and AUC were used to assess the association of each score and compare the models. Results: Among 326 patients, 78 developed CT (8 severe, 21 moderate, 49 mild). A high-risk score from HFA-ICOS was significantly associated with severe and moderate CT(OR: 6.1, p=0.001), sensitivity 37%, and specificity 88%. A very high-risk classification of the institutional score was associated with severe and moderate CT (OR: 8.4, p=0.006), sensitivity 44%, and specificity 81%. No association was found between the ASCVD score stratification and CT. When mild CT was included in the analysis, the AUC values were lower (see Table 1). Conclusions: Cardio-oncology risk scores were associated with severe and moderate CT, outperforming ASCVD, but their predictive capacity was weak. Incorporating other serum or imaging biomarkers into the models may improve the predictive accuracy of CT risk assessment.

Abstract 17237: Trends in Sex and Regional Disparities Among Authorships in American Heart Association Scientific Sessions (2019-2023): A Bibliometric Analysis

Background: Women continue to be underrepresented in clinical medicine, including cardiology, despite improvements in participation. We aim to examine gender and regional disparities in authorship of abstracts published in AHA scientific sessions. Method: AHA journal was screened for abstracts with keywords: "Meta-analysis", "Systematic Review" or "Pooled analysis from 2019-2023. 499 out of 567 studies were included from circulation journal of AHA, and data on gender of first and corresponding (last) author was extracted with a validated smartdata application from 7.5 billion people's names (namsor.app). Abstract category and regions of affiliation data were extracted. Chi-square was used to describe trends. Results: Of 499 abstracts (2019:21.4%, 2020:23.2%, 2021:20.2%, 2022:31.9%, 2023:3.2%) females as first author were 24% and as last author was 18.8%. Categories of abstracts were general cardiology (GC)(32.7%), interventional cardiology (IC)(24.8%), electrophysiology (EP)(12.4%), and cardio-oncology (CO)(2.6%). North America (NA) had the highest number of abstracts (67.5%). Meta-analyses were higher than systematic reviews (88.6% vs. 10.6%), pooled analyses were higher than comparison plots (51.1% vs 41.3%, p =0.001). Male corresponding and first author (62.2%) were higher than inter-sex corresponding and first authors. Yet, corresponding male authors with female first was higher than female corresponding with male first (16.4% vs 11.5%) and corresponding female authors with female first was lower than male first (11.5% vs. 9.9%, p=0.015). Disparity is noted in abstract categories across regions. IC was more in Asia (23.5% vs. 21.6) compared to GC, while GC was more common in Europe (48.5% vs. 24.2%) and NA (32.7% vs 23.2%). Conclusion: Gender disparity was noted across abstract categories and regions. Women need to be represented more in clinical and academic research. Further studies are needed to identify barriers to equal representation.

Global Cardio Oncology Registry (G-COR): Registry Design, Primary Objectives, and Future Perspectives of a Multicenter Global Initiative.

Global collaboration in cardio-oncology is needed to understand the prevalence of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity in different risk groups, practice settings, and geographic locations. There are limited data on the socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities that may impact access to care and outcomes. To address these gaps, we established the Global Cardio-Oncology Registry, a multinational, multicenter prospective registry. We assembled cardiologists and oncologists from academic and community settings to collaborate in the first Global Cardio-Oncology Registry. Subsequently, a survey for site resources, demographics, and intention to participate was conducted. We designed an online data platform to facilitate this global initiative. A total of 119 sites responded to an online questionnaire on their practices and main goals of the registry: 49 US sites from 23 states and 70 international sites from 5 continents indicated a willingness to participate in the Global Cardio-Oncology Registry. Sites were more commonly led by cardiologists (85/119; 72%) and were more often university/teaching (81/119; 68%) than community based (38/119; 32%). The average number of cardio-oncology patients treated per month was 80 per site. The top 3 Global Cardio-Oncology Registry priorities in cardio-oncology care were breast cancer, hematologic malignancies, and patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Executive and scientific committees and specific committees were established. A pilot phase for breast cancer using Research Electronic Data Capture Cloud platform recently started patient enrollment. We present the structure for a global collaboration. Information derived from the Global Cardio-Oncology Registry will help understand the risk factors impacting cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity in different geographic locations and therefore contribute to reduce access gaps in cardio-oncology care. Risk calculators will be prospectively derived and validated.

C8 INSTITUTIONAL VALIDATION OF THE JOINT ANMCO AND AIOM TUSCANY CLINICAL CARDIO–ONCOLOGY PATHWAY FOR THE CARDIOLOGY MANAGEMENT OF CANCER OUTPATIENTS

Abstract Background Given the relevance and the growing complexity of the management of cardio–oncology (CO) outpatients, a common care pathway has been recently proposed by ANMCO and AIOM Tuscany. Materials and methods: The proposal: 1) defined 3 categories of patients to be entered into the pathway (A: known cardiac disease needing active oncology treatment; B: undergoing cancer treatments with potential cardiac toxicity; C: experiencing cardiac toxicity and/or worsening of cardiovascular risk profile); 2) proposed two standard request forms for oncology (ONCO) and hematology (HEM); 3) set the minimum requirements for a cardio–oncology path; 4) indicated follow–up strategies during and after oncological treatments. Given the short observation interval we focused on points 1 and 2. Medical records of all cancer patients for whom a CO examination was required were analized to check if proposed forms have been used and if cases fulfilled into appropriate categories. Observation period was retrospectively set to 1 year starting from October 2022. Minimum appropriateness threshold for each process index was set to 80%. Results A total of 480 requests for a CO visit were retrospectively identified, 322 out of 480 (67%) from medical oncology and 158 out of 480 (33%) from hematology units. Appropriate request form was used in 95% of cases (456 out of 480) with no difference between ONCO and HEM units. All patients but 20 (460 out of 480, 95.8%) fulfilled (at least) one of the 3 pre–defined categories with no difference between ONCO and HEM units. Categories distribution was: A group 25%, B group 60%, and C group 15%. Patients from medical oncology were more likely to belong to A and B groups while cases from hematology to B and C groups. Conclusions Our data indicate that minimum thresholds were met for both index 1 and 2 (with values that are approaching to 100%) so supporting the use of the proposed clinical CO pathway.

P170 WHICH DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE IN CANCER SURVIVORS WITH CHEST PAIN? DESCRIPTION OF A CLINICAL CASE

Abstract Introduction Cancer and CVD often share common risk factors and pathophysiological mechanisms, the relationship can be amplified by oncological treatment. In the case of aromatase inhibitors (AIs), used for a long time in breast cancer (BC) expressing the estrogen receptor there is a significant association with dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome, ischemic heart disease and heart failure. For this reason the ESC guidelines on Cardio–oncology (LG–CO) recommend the evaluation of the baseline CV risk using SCORE2 or SCORE2–OP and aggressive control of CV risk factors (RF) to be integrated with the management of cancer. In case of suspicion of coronary artery disease (CAD), ESC LG–CO recommended the adoption of ESC 2019 guidelines for CAD. We present a case of atypical chest pain (LG 2019 ESC CAD pre–test probability &amp;lt; 15%) in a woman at very high CV risk and in adjuvant therapy with AI for BC Clinical case August 2022: 63–year–old female with multiple RF (premature family history of CAD, smoke, hypertension and dyslipidemia) in adjuvant treatment with Exemestane (Letrozole not tolerated) for BC (2020: T2N0M0 ER 99%, PGr– HER2– Ki67 20%) presents in ER for chest pain typical for site, character and irradiation (constricting – burdening, retrosternal radiating to the neck and shoulders) mainly at rest, in the evening, very rarely induced by rapid efforts. Statin therapy was discontinued after initiation of letrozole therapy for arthralgias – myalgias. At the most recent evaluation of blood chemistry: LDL cholesterol 185 mg/dl, Hb, glycemia and thyroid hormones were normal. ECG and rest, troponin, echocardiogram and exercise ECG were normal. Non–synchronized CT with ECG, performed for tumor staging, showed the presence of multiple calcifications on DA, CX and CD (Figure 1). The CGF confirmed the presence of a critical stenosis on the right coronary artery (Figure 2) and a non–critical stenosis on the DA (Figure 3). Successfully performed PTCA with DES implant and started DAPT + high intensity statin with Ezetimibe in addition to antihypertensive therapy obtaining asymptomaticity and optimal control of CV risk factors (FR) Conclusions Aggressive control of CV RF is mandatory in women with BC on AI therapy and high CV risk; the onset of symptoms suggestive of CAD must not be overlooked and in this context coronary CT can be a valid tool for estimating the atherosclerotic burden and to establish the diagnosis.

P172 A RARE CASE OF PLATINUM CARDIOTOXICITY: CASE REPORT

Abstract Background The chemotherapy regime containing the Carboplatin–Gemcitabine combination is frequently used for improving outcomes in patients affected by metastatic breast cancer. Platinum compounds were included in the recent ESC Guidelines on cardio–oncology as potential agents which may lead to myocardial infarction, thrombosis and, rarely, heart failure. In this instance it is essential for a strict cardiological follow–up to be carried out during and after treatment. Case report: We present a clinical case report of a 38–year–old woman who was receiving standard oncology treatment for stage IV breast adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent chemotherapy cycles containing the Carboplatin–Gemcitabine combination, with a good response to treatment. It came to our attention for severe dyspnoea, which arose several days before, not compatible with her oncological situation. Transthoracic echocardiography showed severe left ventricular dysfunction (EF 25%; GLS – 9.2%; NT–proBNP 10000 pg/mL), which was not present during earlier tests, and circumferential pericardial effusions, mainly localised along the free wall of the right ventricle, non–haemodynamically significant. Lung ultrasound also showed the presence of pulmonary congestion and bilateral pleural effusions. In the circumstances, she was admitted to the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit for continuation of diagnostic treatment. She then received endo–venous diuretic treatment and haemodynamically supported with Noradrenaline and inotropic agents. A cycle of Levosimendan was performed with an excellent response. Once haemodynamic compensation was re–established, the patient underwent a cardiac CMR which excluded cardiomyopathies and myocarditis and a coronarography was performed which showed no significant lesions in the coronary arteries. After 18 days of hospitalisation in our department, the patient showed an improvement in EF (EF 38%, GLS –12.5%, NT–proBNP 2000 pg/mL), and then she was referred to the oncologist for immunological treatment. Conclusions The diagnosis of cardiotoxicity may not be straightforward due to the aspecificity of the symptoms, its silent progression or because of several comorbidities. Moreover, cardiac damage from chemotherapy is considered reversible if identified early. Treatment is based on the withdrawal of therapy and treatment of symptoms, given that these may be different and unpredictable.

P420 A CANCER PATIENT WITH PULMONARY THROMBOEMBOLISM: IS IT RIGHT TO APPLY THE CRITERIA FOR DOSE REDUCTION IN THESE PATIENTS?

Abstract A 78 years old woman presented in our cardio–oncology out–patient clinic to renew apixaban treatment plan. In her medical history she was a former smoker, with a chronic kidney disease in IIIb stadium according to KDIGOI guidelines with a creatinine of 1,54 mg/dl, GFR according CKD 32 ml/min/1.73m2 and according Cockcroft e Gault 28 ml/min/1.73m2. In 2010, she had a right lobe pulmonary cancer diagnosis treated in neo–adjuvant with gemcitabine. After chemotherapy, she underwent surgical lobectomy. During hospitalization she had a deep venous thrombosis complicated by pulmonary thromboembolism, heparin sc was given with resolution of the clinical picture. In 2012 she had a recurrence of pulmonary thromboembolism. Heparin and warfarin in a second time was given. In 2016 for cancer disease progression, she underwent various oncological treatments and she found a stability disease with osimertinib and stereotaxic radiotherapy. Warfarin was switched to apixaban low–doses for low weight and chronic kidney disease. In 2021 in osimertinib therapy, cancer was under control. She was continuing low–dose apixaban. One year later, a CT scan demonstrated a disease progression and inferior cava venous thrombosis. A cardiac evaluation in our unit was required: patients was asymptomatic. EKG and Echocardiogram were normal. Apixaban low dose was changed to edoxaban 30 mg. There was a complete vein recanalization. Unfortunately, patient died after 8 months for cancer. It is important, in the direct oral anticoagulation therapy in cancer patient, to consider not only the indication for dose reduction known by the registration studies but also cancer and therapy factors.

C31 NEXT GENERATION MYOCARDITIS

Abstract A 75–year–old overweight man, affected by hypertension, diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation since 2020. After 3 unsuccessful attempts of electrical cardioversion it was opted for a strategy of rate control with beta blocker and anticoagulant therapy with Rivaroxaban 20 mg. Following episodes of rectal bleeding; adenocarcinoma of the colon was diagnosed. The patient underwent hemicolectomy and started therapy with Pembrolizumab. The anticoagulant was replaced with Edoxaban 60 mg. In August 2022, he was admitted to the emergency department for severe signs and symptoms of heart failure. On ECG, atrial fibrillation with a heart rate of 90 bpm and non–specific changes in ventricular repolarization. The echocardiogram showed a severe reduction of the ejection fraction (FE 30%), which was not present at previous controls. On blood tests, troponins were negative and BNP increased. The patient underwent coronarography which was negative for significant lesions, and heart failure therapy was prescribed. Three months later the patient came to our cardio–oncology outpatient clinic; we repeated the echocardiogram which showed a recovery of the ejection fraction to 45% and planned a cardiac MRI. Cardiac MRI (CMR) showed global left ventricular hypokinesia (FE 42%) and late subepicardial gadoline enhancement in the basal segment of the inferior wall and transmural in the basal segment of the lateral wall without signs of oedema. Report described as compatible with myocarditis. The case was discussed collegially with radiologists and oncologists, and it was decided to discontinue immunotherapy (ICI). Myocarditis is the most common cardiovascular adverse events of ICI therapy, although it has a very low incidence. Generally, myocarditis related to ICI therapy has a high mortality rate and requires discontinuation of ICI. In addition, CMR may have a lower sensitivity in this setting. There is also a possibility of developing left ventricular dysfunction without associated myocarditis in the absence of increase in cardiac troponin and active myocardial inflammation at CMR. Although our case has been defined as myocarditis, it presents some unclear aspects due in part to the early non–diagnosis as a complication of ICI therapy. Although cancer patients taking ICI has expanded considerably in recent years, the evidence on cardiovascular complications is scarce and unknown to the clinical cardiologist.

Cardiotoxicity Due to Docetaxel Rare But it Exists: About a Case and Literature Review

Despite the development of anti-cancer treatments, cancers remain among the most common causes of morbidity and mortality. The prognosis depends on the natural evolution of the disease in the first instance, but also on the increasingly frequent side effects of anticancer treatments. Cardio oncology is an emerging sub-specialization in its own right that deals with these complications. We report the case of an 80-year-old patient with prostate cancer who received 8 courses of docetaxel and developed left ventricular dysfunction related to docetaxel cardiotoxicity. This case is among the few in the literature elucidating docetaxel cardiotoxicity in the form of heart failure, which should prompt consideration of echocardiographic monitoring in patients receiving taxanes.

Abstract 11750: Disparities Among Covid-19 Mortality in Patients With Concurrent Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease in 2020: A Nationwide Analysis

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted important socioeconomic health disparities in the United States. Both cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer are associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. We describe racial or ethnic, sex, and rural disparities in mortality rates from COVID-19 in the US cardio-oncology (C-O) population with concurrent cancer and CVD. Methods: Using the multiple causes of death data files within CDC WONDER, we assessed survival outcomes from March to December 2020 (most intense for COVID-19 deaths) by race or ethnicity, sex, and rural status. C-O populations were defined as having ICD 10 codes C00-C97 for “malignant neoplasms” and ICD 10 codes I10-I15 for “hypertensive heart disease”, I20-I25 for “ischemic heart disease” I30-I51 for “other forms of heart disease” encompassing valvular disorders, cardiac arrythmias, myocarditis, and heart failure &amp; cardiomyopathies, or I70 for peripheral atherosclerosis listed as contributing causes of death. In this population, those with ICD 10 code U07.1 for “COVID-19” listed as an underlying cause of death were included. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) were calculated based on contemporary US population standards. Results: Overall, there were 6,311 deaths from COVID-19 among 16,282 all-cause deaths in the C-O population (AAMR 5.17 deaths/1,000,000 person-years; 95% CI 5.04-5.29). These deaths comprised 1.80% of all COVID-19 deaths (total 350,831) in the study period. Mortality rates were higher in men than women (AAMR 7.35 vs 3.44 deaths/1,000,000; HR 2.13, p&lt;0.0001). Among racial or ethnic groups, mortality rates were highest among African Americans (AAMR 9.31 deaths/1,000,000; 95% CI 8.75-9.88), and higher among Hispanic than non-Hispanic Americans (AAMR 7.10 vs 4.86 deaths/1,000,000; HR 1.46, p&lt;0.0001). Mortality rates were higher in rural areas than metropolitan areas (crude mortality rate 9.15 vs 6.20 deaths/1,000,000; HR 1.48, p &lt;0.001). Conclusion: Among cancer patients with concurrent CVD, COVID-19 deaths were disproportionately higher in male, African American, Hispanic, and rural patients. Further research is needed to understand socioeconomic factors underpinning these disparities and design interventions to improve patient outcomes.

Cardio oncology: Digital innovations, precision medicine and health equity.

The rapid emergence of cardio-oncology has resulted in a rapid growth of cardio-oncology programs, dedicated professional societies sections and committees, and multiple collaborative networks that emerged to amplify the access to care in this new subspecialty. However, most existing data, position statements and guidelines are limited by the lack of availability of large clinical trials to support these recommendations. Furthermore, there are significant challenges regarding proper access to cardio-oncology care and treatment, particularly in marginalized and minority populations. The emergence and evolution of personalized medicine, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning in medicine and in cardio-oncology provides an opportunity for a more targeted, personalized approach to cardiovascular complications of cancer treatment. The proper implementation of these new modalities may facilitate a more equitable approach to adequate and universal access to cardio-oncology care, improve health related outcomes, and enable health care systems to eliminate the digital divide. This article reviews and analyzes the current status on these important issues.

Early access to a cardio-oncology clinic in an Australian context: a qualitative exploration of patient experiences

BackgroundDedicated cardio-oncology services are emerging rapidly around the world in order to provide cardiovascular care (CV) for cancer patients. The perspectives of patients regarding their experience of cardiac surveillance during their cancer journey has not been qualitatively evaluated.MethodsAn interpretative qualitative study. Fifteen, in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with a diverse range of community dwelling patients who attended a newly established cardio-oncology clinic in a large regional city in Australia. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach.ResultsKey themes were identified: (1) Access to a cardio-oncology clinic promotes information and understanding, (2) The experience of early CV intervention, (3) Factors promoting integrated care, (4) Balancing cancer treatment and CV symptoms and (5) Managing past and emerging CV risk factors.ConclusionAs cardio oncology clinics continue to emerge, this study confirms the benefit of early access to a cardiologist for management of existing or emerging CV risk factors and diseases in the context of cancer treatment. Participants valued the opportunity for regular monitoring and management of CV issues that enabled them to continue cancer treatment. However, we identified gaps in education and support towards making positive lifestyle changes that reduce the risk of CV diseases in cancer patients.

C50 CARDIO–ONCO–HAEMATOLOGY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE. A “CHANGELING” CASE: MORE THAN PARADOXICAL BUBBLES

Abstract 39–year–old female, without cardiovascular risk factors. At the end of pregnancy she complained of progressive dyspnoea and so she was admitted to the emergency room. Blood tests showed elevated D–dimer and LDH values. A chest CT scan was performed showing a mediastinal mass of about 15 cm encompassing the ascending aorta, the left brachiocephalic trunk and the superior vena cava, both of which appeared thrombosed. Therapy with low molecular weight heparin was started. The patient underwent a mediastinal biopsy, which documented a primary mediastinal non–Hodgkin‘s lymphoma. The baseline cardiological evaluation showed a preserved ejection fraction (60%) at echocardiogram (ECHO). The first cycle of chemotherapy with R–CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine) was started. After an episode of hypoesthesia of the left upper limb, that regressed spontaneously within a few hours, she performed MRI that showed multiple areolas compatible with ischemic disease. Following these results the patient was submitted to an ECHO with saline solution injected through the right brachial vein that documented evidence of early opacification of the left atrium and subsequent opacification of the right sections (after 3 cardiac cycles) (Fig. 1–2). This finding suggested a right–to–left shunting, via the bronchial lower district to the left atrium (pulmonary veins). This suspicion was confirmed by CT angiography, which showed occlusion of the superior vena cava with passage of contrast into azygos and early opacification of peribronchial venous circles (Fig. 3). A patency of foramen ovale was ruled out by injection of saline solution through the femoral vein. After the second cycle of chemotherapy, ECHO showed diffuse hypokinesia and reduced EF to 50%. It was then decided to proceed with the third cycle according to the intensified R–DAEPOCH scheme, except for doxorubicin, because of the cardiotoxicity developed by the patient. A cardioprotective therapy was also started with bisoprolol and ramipril with rapid titration. At subsequent radiological controls, a progressive reduction of the mediastinal mass was found and after just one month, the echocardiogram showed a complete recovery of the EF. Contrast injection confirmed presence of a veno–venous shunt. Cardio–oncology is an intriguing and complex discipline that requires the development of local multidisciplinary teams for challenging situations that patients with cancer may ask us to address.

P140 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CHEMOTHERAPY CONTAINING NON–PEGYLATED LIPOSOMAL DOXORUBICIN IN PATIENTS AT HIGH CARDIOVASCULAR RISK: A SINGLE–CENTER EXPERIENCE

Abstract Anthracyclines represent the most effective chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of non–Hodgkin‘s lymphoma (NHL), although their use is limited due to the risk of cardiac toxicity. This occurs mainly in elderly patients, those with a history of cardiovascular (CV) disease and/or multiple concomitant risk factors. Liposomal doxorubicin has been shown to reduce this toxicity. The aim of this retrospective study is to investigate the use of non–pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in high–risk patients in terms of haematological response rate and CV events. In a single centre, 15 patients undergoing R–COMP regimen (Rituximab, Prednisone, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Myocet liposomal doxorubicin) were consecutively collected from January 2020 to December 2021. The mean age of patients was 73.9 years and 60% were male. The baseline mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 55.9%; four patients had a baseline FE of &amp;lt; 50%, two of them had a severe reduction in LVEF. Among all patients, 86.7% had systemic hypertension, 40% diabetes mellitus, 46.7% dyslipidaemia and 20% a family history of CV disease. Moreover, 46.7% of patients had at least two concomitant risk factors and 20% at least three. 20% had a history of ischemic heart disease, 13.3% had previous exposure to anthracyclines and 20% with mediastinal radiotherapy; 26.7% had moderate to severe aortic valvulopathy. According to the joint Cardio–Oncology evaluation, 100% of patients had been considered unsuitable for conventional doxorubicin.. More than 85% of the cases were already on cardioactive therapy at baseline evaluation and 66.7% required titration or modification during chemotherapy. With R–COMP, the whole population was able to finish treatment achieved complete haematological remission. The mean LVEF at the end of treatment was 55.8% (p = 0.814). Conclusions Our results support the efficacy and safety of R–COMP in a population at high risk for cardiac events, otherwise excluded from anthracycline–containing therapy. Liposomal formulatio reduces doxorubicin cardiomyocyte accumulation and thus toxicity, providing the best possible treatment for the majority of the onco–haematological population.

Development of a Cardio-Oncology Service in Lithuania: Prediction, Prevention, Monitoring and Treatment of Cancer Treatment-Induced Cardiotoxicity.

Background: Advances in cancer therapy have dramatically improved outcomes for cancer pa-tients. However, cancer treatment can cause several cardiovascular (CV) complications, increasing cardiac mortality and morbidity in cancer patients and survivors. As a result, a new cardiology subspecialty—cardio-oncology (CO)—has been developed. The goals of CO are to understand the mechanism of the cardiotoxicity (CTX) of cancer therapies and invent the best monitoring and treatment strategies to improve the survival of cancer patients. Methods: We performed a retro-spective observational study reporting on the 6-year experience of the first CO service in Vilnius, Lithuania. Cancer patients were consulted by a single part-time specialist at Vilnius University Hospital. All new patients underwent blood tests, including cardiac biomarkers and advanced transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) with stress protocol if indicated. During a follow-up, we evaluated the association of patient survival with such variables as age, gender, reasons for re-ferral, cancer location and stage, cardiovascular (CV) risk factors (RF), and rates and stage of CTX and treatment strategies. Results: 447 patients were consulted (70% females), and the median age was 64 years. Cardiovascular (CV) RF was common: 38.5% of patients had hypertension, almost 38% had dyslipidemia, 29% were obese, 10% were smokers, and 9% had diabetes. Nearly 26% of patients had a history of HF. Early biochemical cardiotoxicity was determined in 27%, early functional cardiotoxicity was seen in 17%, and early mixed cardiotoxicity—in 45% of referred patients treated with cardiotoxic cancer therapies. In addition, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was found in 7% of patients. Beta-blockers (BB) were administered to 61.1% of patients, while angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB) to 54.1% of patients. In addition, 18.3% of patients received loop diuretics and almost 12% mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), respectively. A total of 143 patients died during the 6-year follow-up period. The leading cause of death was primarily cancer (92.3%). Only in 5.6% of patients, cardiovascular complications were reported as the cause of death, and 2.1% of deaths were due to the COVID–19 infection. We found that age (HR 1.020 [95% CI: (1.005–1.036)] p = 0.009); LV diastolic dysfunction (HR 1.731 [95% CI: 1.115–2.689] p = 0.015; NYHA stage II (HR 2.016 [95% CI: 1.242–3.272] p = 0.005; NYHA stage III (HR 3.545 [95% CI: 1.948–6.450] p < 0.001; kidney dysfunction (HR 2.085 [95% CI: 1.377–3.159] p = 0.001; previous cancer (HR 2.004 [95% CI: 1.219–3.295] p = 0.006); tumor progression (HR 1.853 [95% CI: 1.217–2.823] p = 0.004) and lung cancer (HR 2.907 [95%CI: 1.826–4.627] p < 0.001) were statistically significantly associated with the increased risk of all-cause death. Conclusions: CO is a rapidly growing subspecialty of cardiology that aims to remove cardiac disease as a barrier to effective cancer treatment by preventing and reversing cardiac damage caused by cancer therapies. Establishing a CO service requires a cardiologist with an interest in oncology. Continuous education, medical training, and clinical research are crucial to success. Age, previous cancer, tumor progression, kidney dysfunction, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, and NYHA stages were associated with increased mortality.