Cardiac Device-related Infective Endocarditis Research Articles

Infective Endocarditis-Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality, 17 Years, Single-Center Experience in Bulgaria.

Despite enormous developments in medicine, infective endocarditis (IE) remains an ongoing issue for physicians due to increased morbidity and persistently high mortality. Our goal was to assess clinical outcomes in patients with IE and identify determinants of in-hospital mortality. Material and methods: The analysis was retrospective, single-centered, and comprised 270 patients diagnosed with IE from 2005 to 2021 (median age 65 (51-74), male 177 (65.6%). Native IE (NVIE) was observed in 180 (66.7%), prosthetic IE (PVIE) in 88 (33.6%), and cardiac device-related IE (CDRIE) in 2 (0.7%), with non-survivors having much higher rates. Healthcare-associated IE (HAIE) was 72 (26.7%), Staphylococci were the most prevalent pathogen, and the proportion of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) non-HACEK was significantly greater in non-survivors than survivors (11 (15%) vs. 9 (4.5%), p = 0.004). Overall, 54 (20%) patients underwent early surgery, with a significant difference between dead and alive patients (3 (4.5%) vs. 51 (25.1%, p = 0.000). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 24.8% (67). Logistic regression was conducted on the total sample (n = 270) for the period 2005-2021, as well as the sub-periods 2005-2015 (n = 119) and 2016-2021 (n = 151), to identify any differences in the trend of IE. For the overall group, the presence of septic shock (OR-83.1; 95% CI (17.0-405.2), p = 0.000) and acute heart failure (OR-24.6; 95% CI (9.2-65.0), p = 0.000) increased the risk of mortality. Early surgery (OR-0.03, 95% CI (0.01-0.16), p = 0.000) and a low Charlson comorbidity index (OR-0.85, 95% CI (0.74-0.98, p = 0.026) also lower this risk. Between 2005 and 2015, the presence of septic shock (OR 76.5, 95% CI 7.11-823.4, p = 0.000), acute heart failure (OR-11.5, 95% CI 2.9-46.3, p = 0.001), and chronic heart failure (OR-1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.8, p = 0.022) enhanced the likelihood of a fatal outcome. Low Charlson index comorbidity (CCI) lowered the risk (OR-0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.95, p = 0.026). For the period 2016-2021, the variable with the major influence for the model is the failure to perform early surgery in indicated patients (OR-240, 95% CI 23.2-2483, p = 0.000) followed by a complication of acute heart failure (OR-72.2, 95% CI 7.5-693.6. p = 0.000), septic shock (OR-17.4, 95% CI 2.0-150.8, p = 0.010), previous stroke (OR-9.2, 95% CI 1.4-59.4, p = 0.020) and low ejection fraction (OR-1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.2, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Knowing the predictors of mortality would change the therapeutic approach to be more aggressive, improving the short- and long-term prognosis of IE patients.

Predictors of Mortality in Patients with Cardiac Device-Related Infective Endocarditis.

Infective endocarditis (IE) associated with implantable cardiac devices (ICD) is a serious disease with high mortality rates. The increased number of ICD implants has led to increased ICD infection rates. The aim of this study was to characterize clinical, laboratory profiles and the prognosis of cardiac-device-related endocarditis (CDIE), as well as to identify predictors of in-hospital death. A total of 274 patients with IE were included in a prospective cohort (2007-2019). From these, 82 patients (30%) had CDIE (46 pacemakers, 23 cardioverter defibrillators, and 13 cardiac resynchronization therapy devices). Predisposed conditions; clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic parameters; etiologic agents; and in-hospital outcomes were evaluated. The mean age was 55.8 ± 16.4 years, where 64.6% were male. Among the clinical manifestations at diagnosis, the most prevalent were heart failure (67.9%), fever (60.5%), anorexia/hyporexia (44.4%), and heart murmur (37.5%). The median serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level at diagnosis was 63 mg/L (interquartile range [IQR] 20-161). Etiological agents were identified through positive blood cultures in 55% of cases. The main etiologic agents were negative-coagulase staphylococci (19.5%) and Staphylococcus aureus (18.3%). Vegetation was identified in 74 patients (90.1%). In-hospital mortality was 28%. CRP concentrations at diagnosis were identified as markers of disease severity (odds ratio [OR] 1.006; 95%CI 1.001-1.011; p = 0.016), and the worsening of heart failure was associated with unfavorable outcomes (OR 3.105; 95%CI 1.397-6.902; p = 0.005). Unlike what is traditionally accepted, CDIE does not have a better prognosis.

Cutibacterium Species Valvular and Cardiac Device-Related Infective Endocarditis: Contemporary Data From the GAMES Prospective Cohort (2008-2023).

Information on infective endocarditis (IE) caused by Cutibacterium spp. is limited and new Duke-International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) criteria have not yet been properly assessed. We examined clinical characteristics, outcomes, and performance of diagnostic tests for Cutibacterium valvular and cardiac implantable electronic device-related IE (CIED-IE). Data corresponding to all episodes of Cutibacterium IE recorded from 2008 to 2023 in a prospective national cohort including 46 Spanish hospitals were examined. Possible IE cases were reassessed using the new criteria. The sensitivity of blood cultures, valvular and CIED cultures, and polymerase chain reaction of the 16S rRNA gene and sequencing (16SPCR) was evaluated. Of 6692 episodes of IE, 67 (1%) were caused by Cutibacterium spp. with 85% affecting men. Of these, 50 were valve-related (45 prosthetic, 5 native) and 17 CIED-related. The new criteria identified 8 additional cases and reclassified 15 as definite IE. Intracardiac complications (abscess, pseudoaneurysm, perforation, or intracardiac fistula) occurred in 23 of 50 (46%) valvular IE episodes, leading to 18% mortality, and up to 40% mortality if surgery was indicated but could not be performed. All CIED-IE cases underwent device removal and no deaths were recorded. Positive diagnosis rates for blood cultures, valve/device cultures, and 16SPCR were 52%, 70%, and 82%, respectively. Cutibacterium IE is a rare yet potentially life-threatening condition that warrants a high index of suspicion in men with endovascular prosthetic material. The new Duke-ISCVID criteria and molecular techniques are useful for its diagnosis. Considering a significant complication rate, cardiac surgery and removal of CIEDs play a key role in reducing mortality.

Cardiac Device-related Infective Endocarditis and Retrosternal Abscess Treated with Percutaneous Lead Extraction and Antimicrobials: A Case Report.

An 85-year-old man with a history of 2 open-heart surgeries (for aortic regurgitation and infective endocarditis [IE]) and pacemaker implantation for bradycardic atrial fibrillation presented with a fever. Transesophageal echocardiography revealed a pacemaker lead vegetation. Computed tomography showed a retrosternal abscess. He was diagnosed with acute heart failure and IE. Given the high surgical risk due to his age, acute heart failure, and surgical history, we decided against cardiac surgery. After lead extraction, a leadless pacemaker was inserted, and antimicrobial therapy was administered. The patient was discharged on day 48, highlighting a strategy for managing complex cardiac device-related IE.

A single centre retrospective analysis of the management and outcomes of cardiac device-related infective endocarditis

Abstract Background/intro Cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE) is a rare but serious complication of cardiac device insertion with a high mortality rate. Cardiac devices are increasingly being implanted in older patients amid an ageing population with more comorbidities. Our centre is a large cardiac surgery referral centre in London. The centre implants a large number of cardiac devices per year (an average of 2168 per year from 2016 - 2019). The IE multidisciplinary team (IE MDT) manages approximately 150 IE referrals from the region per year. Purpose We aimed to describe a cohort of patients with CRDIE, referred to the IE MDT over 5 years (2015-2020), to generate a contemporary representation of patients with CDRIE. Methods We carried out a retrospective review of all referrals to the IE MDT between 2015 and 2020, identifying all patients with CDRIE - infection extending to the electrode leads, cardiac valve lead(s) or endocardial surface (ESC). All patients who were discussed at the IE MDT between October 2015 and March 2020 were screened, based on inclusion criteria according to the ESC's definition of CDRIE. Patients who had an infection of the cardiac device pocket with no evidence of IE were excluded. Results 60 out of 928 IE patients had confirmed CRDIE after discussion in the IE MDT from 10/2015 and 03/2020. The average age of the cohort was 70.3 (male =44, 73%). 61.7% of the devices were PPM (n=37), 10% were ICD, 20% were CRT-D, and 8.3% were CRT-P. The average duration of device therapy before removal was 64 months. 66.7% of devices were extracted (n=40) and 33.3% were managed medically (n=20). 43.3% of the cohort had prosthetic valves (n=26), and 13.3% of the total cohort had tissue aortic valve implants (TAVI) (n=8). 85% had a transesophageal echo (TOE) procedure (n=51) and 61.7% went on to have a PET CT scan (n=37). The overall inpatient mortality was 25% (n=15), rising to 45% at 12 months (n=27). Patients managed medically had a significantly higher mortality at 6 and 12 months compared to those who received an extraction and antibiotics (figure 1). There was no difference in left or right ventricular systolic function pre- and post- treatment on average or degree of tricuspid regurgitation. Medically managed patients were frailer by Charlson Index (average Charlson Index score 3) than surgically managed patients (average Charlson Index score 2). Conclusions In a retrospective assessment of CRDIE, we found that there is a low incidence of CRDIE complicating cardiac device insertion at BHC when compared to the national average. We found that surgical removal improves the likelihood of survival at 6 and 12 months when compared to medical management in those with a severe Charlson score, suggesting that even in cases of frailty and multiple morbidities, device extraction is preferable (figure 2).Survival curve of all CDRIE patientsSurvival curve in the severely frail

18F-FDG PET/CT assisted exclusion of cardiac device-related infective endocarditis

18F-FDG PET/CT assisted exclusion of cardiac device-related infective endocarditis

Cardiac device-related infective endocarditis need for lead extraction whatever the device according to the ESC EORP EURO-ENDO registry.

Cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE) is a severe complication of cardiac device (CD) implantation and is usually treated by antibiotic therapy and percutaneous device extraction. Few studies report the management and prognosis of CDRIE in real life. In particular, the rate of device extraction in clinical practice and the management of patients with left heart infective endocarditis (LHIE) and an apparently non-infected CD (LHIE+CDRIE-) are not well described. We sought to study in EURO-ENDO, the characteristics, prognosis, and management of 483 patients with a CD included in the European Society of Cardiology EurObservational Research Programme EURO-ENDO registry. Three populations were compared: 280 isolated CDRIE (66.7 ± 14.3 years), 157 patients with LHIE and an apparently non-infected CD (LHIE+CDRIE-) (71.1 ± 13.6), and 46 patients with both LHIE and CDRIE (LHIE+CDRIE+) (70.2 ± 10.1). Echocardiography was not always transoesophageal echography (TOE); it was transthoracic echography (TTE) for isolated CDRIE in 88.4% (TOE = 67.6%), for LHIE+CDRIE- TTE = 93.0% (TOE = 58.6%), and for CDRIE+LHIE+ TTE = 87.0% (TOE = 63.0%). Nuclear imaging was performed in 135 patients (positive for 75.6%). In-hospital mortality was lower in isolated CDRIE 13.2% vs. 22.3% and 30.4% for LHIE+CDRIE- and LHIE+CDRIE+ (P = 0004). Device extraction was performed in 62.1% patients with isolated CDRIE, 10.2% of LHIE+CDRIE- patients, and 45.7% of CDRIE+LHIE+ patients. Device extraction was associated with a better prognosis [hazard ratio 0.59 (0.40-0.87), P = 0.0068] even in the LHIE+CDRIE- group (P = 0.047). Prognosis of endocarditis in patients with a CD remains poor, particularly in the presence of an associated LHIE. Although recommended by guidelines, device extraction is not always performed. Device removal was associated with better prognosis, even in the LHIE+CDRIE- group.

Temporary trends of cardiac device related infective endocarditis in a tertiary referral center between 2006 and 2022

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare, but life-threatening complication of cardiac device implantation. Despite recent preventive strategies and advances in antimicrobial and surgical treatment, morbidity and mortality rates are still high. Aims The objective of our study was to assess the epidemiological characteristics, temporal trends and mortality rates of cardiac device related IE (CDRIE) in our high-volume, tertiary referral center. Methods retrospective data collection was performed between January 1, 2006 and March 31, 2022. Median follow-up was 3.8 yrs (IQR: 0.6 – 9.2 yrs). Patients admitted between 2006 and 2013 (group 1) and between 2014 and 2022 (group 2) were compared to assess temporal trends. Thirty-day, 6-month and 1-year mortality rates were estimated. Results During the observed 17 years 82 patients were admitted with CDRIE (61 males [74%]), mean age: 57.3 ±18 yrs; 6 VVI, 7 VDD, 17 VVI-ICD, 24 DDD, 10 DDD-ICD and 18 CRT devices [4 CRT-P, 14 CRT-D]); median time since first implantation was 3.8 yrs [IQR: 1.1 – 6.6 yrs]). Staphylococci were the most prevalent infective agents (62%), S. aureus (SA) infection was found in 37 cases (out of whom 13 were MRSA [16%]), coagulase negative Staphylococcus in 14 cases (17%), Enterococcus faecalis in 9 cases (11%), streptococci in 4 cases (5%), blood culture was negative in 13 cases (15%), and in 5 cases other pathogens were the underlying microorganism. Patients in Group 1 (n=42) did not differ from patients in Group 2 (n=40) in terms of age, male gender or ejection fraction. Patients in Group 2 had higher CRP level at admission (42,9 [IQR:34-55] mmol/l vs 90 [IQR:25-60] mmol/l, p=0.02). ICD lead (29% vs 67%, p<0.001) and E. faecalis infection (2% vs 20%, p=0.03) and percutan extraction (55% vs 75%, p=0.05) were more prevalent in Group 2. The 30-day and 6-month mortality rates were worse in Group 2 than in Group 1 (2% vs 17.5% p=0.03; and 16% vs 35% p=0.04 resp.) while the 1-year mortality did not differ (24% vs 40%). The all-cause mortality was 10% at 30 days, 26% at 6 month and 32% at 1 year. Univariate regression showed that age (HR: 1.03 [1.01-1.07] p<0.05), ejection fraction (HR: 0.96 [0.93-0.98] p<0.005), ICD lead (HR: 4.89 [1.82-14.40] p<0.005) and the time since first implantation (HR: 0.88 [0.77-0.98] p<0.05) were the predictors of 1-year mortality. However, in Cox multiple regression model only age (HR: 1.05 [1.004-1.1] p<0.05) and ICD lead (HR: 1.16 [1.16-17.38] p<0.05) remains independent predictors of outcome at 1 year. Conclusions In the past 17 years the most prevalent underlying microorganism were staphylococcal species, although Enterococcus faecalis infection increased over time. Patients with CDRIE had poor prognosis, every third patient died at 1 year after diagnosis. The short-term prognosis is even worse in the past few years than before, which may be a negative consequence of limited accessibility of healthcare due to COVID 19 pandemic.

Long-term outcome in patients with heart failure and diabetes mellitus treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a proven therapy in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, little is known about the long-term prognosis and the risk of cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE) in patients with HF and diabetes mellitus (DM) treated with CRT. Aim To assess the long-term outcomes, mortality predictors, and the risk of CDRIE in patients with HF and DM undergoing CRT. Methods Study population consisted of 1059 consecutive patients with CRT implanted between 2002 and 2019 in a tertiary care university hospital in a densely inhabited, urban region of Poland (949 subjects [89.6%] with CRT-D; 110 patients with CRT-P [10.4%]; 832 men [78.6%]). Population was divided into DM and control group (without DM); n=367 (34.7%) vs. n=692 (65.3%), respectively. Results During the median follow-up of 1661 days (10th and 90th percentile: 323-3995), all-cause mortality in DM group was significantly higher than in control group (61.9% vs. 50.3%, P=0.0003; Figure 1). The risk of CDRIE was 6.5% vs. 4.9% respectively in both groups (P=0.27). On multivariable regression analysis, older age (HR 1.03, 95%CI 1.01-1.05, P<0.001), ischemic cardiomyopathy (HR 1.60, 95%CI 1.18-2.19, P=0.003), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (HR 0.96, 95%CI 0.94-0.99, P=0.002), higher creatinine level (HR 1.004, 95%CI 1.001-1.006, P=0.001), and diabetes treated with insulin (HR 1.56, 95%CI 1.19-2.05, P=0.001) were identified as independent predictors of higher mortality in patients with DM undergoing CRT impantation. Conclusions Compared with patients without diabetes, mortality rates of those with DM treated with CRT implantation are significantly higher and nearly 2/3 of patients die within 4.5 years. Advanced age, ischemic cardiomyopathy, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher creatinine level, and diabetes treated with insulin are independent mortality predictors in subjects with HF and DM treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier curves for survival of patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM) treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (log rank P<0.001)

P483 IMPACT OF AN ENDOCARDITIS TEAM ON PROGNOSIS: PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Abstract Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life–threatening microbial infection with high mortality rate (6–50% in–hospital and 19–82% at 5–years)1.Guidelines for management of infective endocarditis underline the importance of multidisciplinary approach with an Endocarditis Team (ET) for the complexity of disease and for prognosis which depends on patients’ characteristics, microorganisms involved and local or systemic complications.ET includes specialists that define multimodality imaging approach to confirm diagnosis and to exclude local or systemic complications, discuss timing of antibiotic therapy, indication and timing of surgical treatments and follow–up. This study was a retrospective analysis based on a population of 86 patients from Infermi Hospital, Rimini, who received a diagnosis of IE from 2019 to 2021 thanks to a multidisciplinary approach. Among 86 patients, 76 (88,4%) had early–diagnosed IE and 10 (11,3%) had late–diagnosed IE.Early–diagnoses IE was defined when diagnoses occurred within 30 days from first symptoms.The aim of this study was to assess the impact of ET on timeliness of diagnosis and prognosis.Comparing the two groups, in the early–diagnosed IE we found higher rate of risk factors for endocarditis and systemic embolisation (27,6% vs. 20%), with Staphylococcus and Streptococcus as the most frequent causative pathogens (43,4% and 31,5%).More frequently the late–diagnosed IE group had mechanical prosthetic valves (20% vs 7,8%) with a higher rate of cardiac surgery (80% vs 35,5%), cardiac valves complications such as abscesses, perforations and pseudo–aneurysms (20% vs 18,4%) and a higher rate of intra–hospital mortality (40% vs 18,4%). Streptococcus and Enterococcus were most involved in the late–diagnosed group.Several trials demonstrated that presence of ET reduces 1–year mortality from 18.5% to 8.2% 2 and in–hospital mortality from 28% to 13% 3. Our preliminary study confirms the importance of ET application to improve early diagnosis (88.4%) and to reduce mortality. Bibliography:1.Kouijzer et al., Native valve, prosthetic valve, and cardiac device–related infective endocarditis: A review and update on current innovative diagnostic and therapeutic strategies(2022). 2.Botelho–Nevers et al. Dramatic reduction in infective endocarditis–related mortality with a management–based approach(2009). 3.Chirillo,F.et al. Impact of a multidisciplinary management strategy on the outcome of patients with native valve infective endocarditis(2013).

P254 "GHOST" IN RIGHT VENTRICLE: AN ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC FINDING AFTER TRANSVENOUS LEAD EXTRACTION

Abstract Introduction Prolonged antibiotic therapy and complete hardware removal are recommended in definite cardiac device–related infective endocarditis (CDRIE), as well as in presumably isolated pocket infection, in class I. A tubular mobile mass, known as ghost, that previously surrounded the lead can be detected by ultrasounds, in 8–14% of patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction (TLE). Case presentation: A 72–year–old man with ischemic cardiomyopathy is referred to our center due to a persistent fever. His medical history shows a previous extraction of CRT–D for infection of the left infraclavicular pocket, with a new implantation of CRT–P on the right side of the chest, in consideration of the recovery of the ejection fraction. At the entrance to the ward he has fever and inflammation‘s signs of the pocket of the generator, with positive blood cultures for Staphylococcus Aureus Methicillin resistant. A transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) excludes vegetations of valve systems and electrocatheters. Therefore, the patient begins antibiotic therapy and undergoes full extraction of the device (generator and leads). A post–operative transthoracic echocardiography shows the presence of a linear image of 2.5 cm in the right ventricle, seen as remnants of scar tissue surrounding the lead. ECG monitoring detects phases of BAV 2:1. Considering the high risk of infectious disease, a pacemaker leadless implantation is indicated. The surgery is postposted at the end of the 4 weeks of antibiotic therapy, checking blood cultures before implantation to reduce the residual infectious risk. Discussion The persistence of fibrous residues after TLE has been variously described in recent years, but it is unclear whether these are predictors of increased mortality. The current guidelines on the therapeutic management of patients with infectious endocarditis and pacemaker dependency do not indicated the timing of reimplantation, in a potentially infectious ghost setting. Clinical co–morbidities play a crucial role in the prognosis of patients, especially when combined with systemic infections. Conclusion An echocardiographic follow–up is recommended to detect ghost disappearance in patients undergoing explant due to a related device infection. In fact, a rapid fibrin dissolution process usually takes place when the thrombogenic stimulus is removed.

Mitral valve infective endocarditis in a dialysis patient with a tunneled dialysis catheter and prior MitraClip® implantation: an autopsy case

BackgroundThe number of patients with heart disease who can benefit from treatment is continuing to increase due to the widespread use of cardiac implantable devices. Accordingly, the number of cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE) cases has been increasing year by year. We report a very rare experience of performing an autopsy on a patient who died of CDRIE at the site of MitraClip ® implantation, which has recently been developed as a treatment option for severe mitral regurgitation. In addition to hematoxylin–eosin (H-E) staining, Elastica-Masson staining in the present case revealed destruction of all of the atrial, trabecular, fiber and myocardial layers.Case presentationThe patient was hemodialyzed with a dialysis catheter. Hemodialysis treatment was difficult due to functional mitral regurgitation caused by cardiac dysfunction, and the MitraClip® procedure was performed. However, he subsequently developed a fever and dialyzation became difficult again, and he was admitted to the cardiology department.Echocardiography revealed a large vegetation at the site of MitraClip® implantation and a diagnosis of CDRIE was made. Guidelines recommend removal of the device and surgical intervention. However, considering the patient's general condition, a decision was made at a heart team conference to give priority to antibiotic therapy. However, the patient did not respond to antibiotic therapy and died of septic shock.ConclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first reported case of CDRIE and death after MitraClip® implantation that resulted in an autopsy. Furthermore, not only H-E staining but also Elastica-Masson staining was performed, and it was confirmed that there was significant valve tissue destruction. In the future, the MitraClip® procedure, even though it is minimally invasive, should be carefully considered in immunocompromised patients.

Native valve, prosthetic valve, and cardiac device-related infective endocarditis: A review and update on current innovative diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening microbial infection of native and prosthetic heart valves, endocardial surface, and/or indwelling cardiac device. Prevalence of IE is increasing and mortality has not significantly improved despite technological advances. This review provides an updated overview using recent literature on the clinical presentation, diagnosis, imaging, causative pathogens, treatment, and outcomes in native valve, prosthetic valve, and cardiac device-related IE. In addition, the experimental approaches used in IE research to improve the understanding of disease mechanisms and the current diagnostic pipelines are discussed, as well as potential innovative diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. This will ultimately help towards deriving better diagnostic tools and treatments to improve IE patient outcomes.

Long-term outcome in patients with heart failure after cardiac surgery other than coronary artery bypass grafting treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy

Abstract Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been proven therapy in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, little is known about the prognosis, and the risk of cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE) in patients with HF after cardiac surgery other than coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) treated with CRT. Aim To assess the long-term outcome, mortality predictors, and the risk of CDRIE in patients with HF after cardiac surgery other than CABG treated with CRT. Methods The study population consisted of 1059 consecutive patients with CRT implanted between 2002 and 2019 in a tertiary care university hospital in a densely inhabited, urban region of Poland (949 subjects [89.6%] with CRT-D; 110 patients with CRT-P [10.4%]). Results The studied population was divided into two groups according to be or not after cardiac surgery other than CABG (n=74 patients [6.9%] vs. n=985 patients [93.1%]). During the median follow-up of 1661 days (10th and 90th percentile: 323–3995), all-cause mortality in patients after cardiac surgery other than CABG did not differ significantly in comparison to other CRT recipients (50% vs. 54.4%, P=0.46). Also, the risk of CDRIE was not statistically significant differ (2.7% vs. 5.7%, P=0.28). On multivariable regression analysis, only older age (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01–1.07, P=0.02) was identified as independent predictor of higher mortality in patients after cardiac surgery treated with CRT. Kaplan-Meier curves of survival of patients after cardiac surgery other than CABG treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy in comparison to other CRT recipients are presented on Picture 1. Conclusions The mortality rate in patients after cardiac surgery other than CABG is similar to other subjects treated with CRT and reaches 50% within 4.5 years. The risk of device-related infective endocarditis is not higher than in other patients treated with CRT. Advanced age is an independent mortality predictor in subjects after cardiac surgery other than CABG undergoing CRT. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Vacuum-Implemented Removal of Lead Vegetations in Cardiac Device-Related Infective Endocarditis.

When approaching infected lead removal in cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE), a surgical consideration for large (>20 mm) vegetations is recommended. We report our experience with the removal of large CDRIE vegetations using the AngioVac system, as an alternative to conventional surgery. We retrospectively reviewed all infected lead extractions performed with a prior debulking using the AngioVac system, between October 2016 and April 2022 at our institution. A total of 13 patients presented a mean of 2(1) infected leads after a mean of 5.7(5.7) years from implantation (seven implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, four cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators, and two pacemakers). The AngioVac system was used as a venous–venous bypass in six cases (46.2%), venous–venous ECMO-like circuit (with an oxygenator) in five (38.5%), and venous–arterial ECMO-like circuit in two cases (15.4%). Successful (>70%) aspiration of the vegetations was achieved in 12 patients (92.3%) and an intraoperative complication (cardiac perforation) only occurred in 1 case (7.7%). Subsequent lead extraction was successful in all cases, either manually (38.5%) or using mechanical tools (61.5%). The AngioVac system is a promising effective and safe option for large vegetation debulking in CDRIE. Planning the extracorporeal circuit design may represent the optimal strategy to enhance the tolerability of the procedure and minimize adverse events.

Corynebacterium endocarditis in a patient with a cardiac implantable electronic device

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections have been rising around the world. Many microorganisms can lead to this disease. Corynebacterium species are catalase-positive Gram-positive bacilli, also known as "diphtheroids" or "coryneform" bacteria, were once almost universally dismissed as contamination when recovered from patients, but they are now increasingly being linked to serious infections and have the ability to form biofilms and rarely cause CIED infections and this can be complicated as infective endocarditis. Corynebacterium spp. are frequently overlooked as contaminants in blood cultures, yet they can cause a serious infective endocarditis (IE). Antibiotic resistance is increasing among Corynebacterium spp., and this makes treatment more challenging. There are few reports of IE caused by Corynebacterium spp., and more research is needed. Here, we report a case of 55- year old man with Corynebacterium spp. cardiac device-related infective endocarditis.

18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of cardiac device-related infective endocarditis

18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of cardiac device-related infective endocarditis

Predictors of mortality in patients with right-side and cardiac device-related infective endocarditis, the esc-eorp euro-endo registry

Abstract Background/Introduction Mortality in right-sided infective endocarditis (RSIE) and cardiac device-related IE (CDRIE) rates have increased mainly due derived complications and heterogeneity of the disease. A better understanding of associated risk factors to mortality in these entities are required in order to develop an efficient therapy. Purpose The aim of this study was to assess 30-day mortality rate and variables associated in RSIE and CDRIE. Methods The ESC-EORP EURO-ENDO registry is a prospective multicenter observational study of patients presenting with definite or possible IE in Europe and ESC-affiliated/non-affiliated countries. Patients were included from January 2016 to 31 March 2018 in 156 centers from 40 countries. Clinical data, blood test analysis and multi-modality imaging tests (echocardiography, computed tomography, PET-CT, magnetic resonance) were collected. Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Univariable analysis was performed to assess variables associated with 30-day mortality. Results Among 269 patients with RSIE, 24 patients (9.8%) died during the first 30-day of IE diagnosis. Cut-off value for best vegetation size related to 30-day mortality was vegetation length >19mm, with a HR = 2.88 (95% CI 1.26–6.58, p=0.01) and a Harrell's Concordance of 0.632. Factors associated with 30-days mortality by univariable analysis were: vegetation size >19mm (OR = 2.99, 95% CI [1.31–6.84], p=0.009), previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (OR = 5.10, 95% CI [1.19–21.88], p=0.029), HIV infection (OR = 3.52, 95% CI [1.03–12.10], p=0.046), chronic renal failure (OR = 2.66, 95% CI [1.06–6.71], p=0.038), congestive heart failure at admission (OR = 2.34, 95% CI [1.00–5.47], p=0.050) and severe regurgitation (OR = 3.77, 95% CI [1.56–9.09], p=0.003). On the other side, among the 227 patients with CDRIE, 24 patients (8.8%) died during the first 30-day of IE diagnosis. Factors associated with an increase in 30-day mortality by univariate analysis were: age per 10 years (OR = 1.49, 95% CI [1.02–2.18], p=0.039), heart failure history (OR = 3.88, 95% CI [1.39–10.80], p=0.009), congestive heart failure on admission (OR = 5.80, 95% CI [2.31–14.55], p<0.001) and cardiogenic shock on admission (OR = 13.37, 95% CI [3.75–47.64], p<0.001). An increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) per 10% was a protective factor (OR = 0.66, 95% CI [0.49–0.90], p=0.008). Conclusions Patients with RSIE and CDRIE had a not negligible 30-day mortality rate (9.8% and 8.8%, respectively). Factors associated with RSIE and CDRIE mortality are different; while in the right side location, the mortality was related with vegetation size and comorbidities, in the case of CDRIE, the mortality was mainly associated to the presence of heart failure. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Euro-Endo registry by European Society of Cardiology

The Diagnostic Value of 99mTc-HMPAO-Labelled White Blood Cell Scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Cardiac Device-Related Infective Endocarditis-A Systematic Review.

(1) Background: Treatment of cardiac arrhythmias and conduction disorders with the implantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) may lead to complications. Cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE) stands out as being one of the most challenging in terms of its diagnosis and management. Developing molecular imaging modalities may provide additional insights into CDRIE diagnosis. (2) Methods: We performed a systematic literature review to critically appraise the evidence for the diagnostic performance of the following hybrid techniques: single photon emission tomography with technetium99m-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime–labeled autologous leukocytes (99mTc-HMPAO-SPECT/CT) and positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG PET/CT). An analysis was performed in accordance with PRISMA and GRADE criteria and included articles from PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases. (3) Results: Initially, there were 2131 records identified which had been published between 1971–2021. Finally, 18 studies were included presenting original data on the diagnostic value of 99mTc-HMPAO-SPECT/CT or 18F-FDG PET/CT in CDRIE. Analysis showed that these molecular imaging modalities provide high diagnostic accuracy and their inclusion in diagnostic criteria improves CDRIE work-up. (4) Conclusions: 99mTc-HMPAO-SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT provide high diagnostic value in the identification of patients at risk of CDRIE and should be considered for inclusion in the CDRIE diagnostic process.

The emergence of Staphylococcus aureus as the primary cause of cardiac device-related infective endocarditis.

Increasing use of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED), as permanent pacemakers (PPM), implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), is associated with the emergence of CIED-related infective endocarditis (CIED-IE). We aimed to characterize CIED-IE profile, temporal trends, and prognostic factors. CIED-IE diagnosed at Rennes University Hospital during years 1992-2017 were identified through computerized database, and included if they presented all of the following: (1) clinical signs of infection; (2) microbiological documentation through blood and/or CIED lead cultures; (3) lead or valve vegetation, or definite IE according to Duke criteria. Data were retrospectively extracted from medical charts. The cohort was categorized in three periods: 1992-1999, 2000-2008, and 2009-2017. We included 199 patients (51 women, 148 men, median age 73years [interquartile range, 64-79]), with CIED-IE: 158 PPMs (79%), 24 ICD (12%), and 17 CRT (9%). Main pathogens were coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS: n = 86, 43%), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 60, 30%), and other Gram-positive cocci (n = 28, 14%). Temporal trends were remarkable for the decline in CoNS (P = 0.002), and the emergence of S. aureus as the primary cause of CIED-IE (24/63 in 2009-2017, 38%). Factors independently associated with one-year mortality were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD: hazard ratio 3.84 [1.03-6.02], P = 0.03), left-sided endocarditis (HR 2.25 [1.09-4.65], P = 0.03), pathogens other than CoNS (HR 3.16 [1.19-8.39], P = 0.02), and CIED removal/reimplantation (HR 0.41 [0.20-0.83], P = 0.01). S. aureus has emerged as the primary cause of CIED-IE. Left-sided endocarditis, COPD, pathogens other than CoNS, and no CIED removal/reimplantation are independent risk factors for one-year mortality.