Carcinogenicity Studies In Mice Research Articles

Risk Assessment of Pulegone in Foods Based on Benchmark Dose-Response Modeling.

This study presents a new risk assessment of pulegone, a substance classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) by the WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). The analysis used data from a two-year carcinogenicity studies in rats and mice conducted by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) in 2011. Because of the absence of a no-observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) in these studies, the benchmark dose (BMD) approach was employed as an alternative risk assessment method. The lowest BMD lower confidence level (BMDL) of 4.8 mg/kg b.w./day among the eight endpoints served as the point of departure for calculating an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 48 μg/kg b.w./day. This new ADI is significantly lower than the previously established tolerable daily intake of 0.1 mg/kg b.w./day set in 1997. The analysis also considered various genotoxicity studies, which indicate that pulegone's effects follow a nongenotoxic, thresholded mechanism. The estimated intake levels of pulegone in the European Union and USA were below the newly calculated ADI, suggesting a low health risk based on current consumption patterns.

Survey of tumorigenic sensitivity in 6-month rasH2-Tg mice studies compared with 2-year rodent assays.

The pharmacokinetic endpoint of a 25-fold increase in human exposure is one of the specified criteria for high-dose selection for 2-year carcinogenicity studies in rodents according to ICH S1C(R2). However, this criterion is not universally accepted for 6-month carcinogenicity tests in rasH2-Tg mice. To evaluate an appropriate multiple for rasH2-Tg mice, we evaluated data for 53 compounds across five categories of rasH2-Tg mouse-positive [(1) genotoxic and (2) non-genotoxic] carcinogens and rasH2-Tg mouse-negative [(3) non-genotoxic carcinogens with clear or uncertain human relevance; (4) non-genotoxic rodent-specific carcinogens; and (5) non-carcinogens], and surveyed their tumorigenic activities and high doses in rasH2-Tg mice and 2-year rodent models. Our survey indicated that area under the curve (AUC) margins (AMs) or body surface area-adjusted dose ratios (DRs) of tumorigenesis in rasH2-Tg mice to the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) were 0.05- to 5.2-fold in 6 category (1) compounds with small differences between models and 0.2- to 47-fold in 7 category (2) including three 2-year rat study-negative compounds. Among all 53 compounds, including 40 compounds of the rasH2-Tg mouse-negative category (3), (4), and (5), no histopathologic risk factors for rodent neoplasia were induced only at doses above 50-fold AM or DR in rasH2-Tg mice except for two compounds, which induced hyperplasia and had no relationship with the tumors observed in the rasH2-Tg mouse or 2-year rodent studies. From the results of these surveys, we confirmed that exceeding a high dose level of 50-fold AM in rasH2-Tg mouse carcinogenicity studies does not appear to be of value.

Thymic Lymphomas in a 6-Month rasH2-Tg Mouse Carcinogenicity Study With the RORγt Inverse Agonist, BMS-986251.

BMS-986251 is a retinoid-related orphan receptor γt (RORγt) inverse agonist that was in development for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. RORγt is a nuclear hormone receptor and transcription factor that is involved in the differentiation and function of T helper 17 cells. RORγt-deficient (constitutive or conditional) mice develop thymic lymphomas with >50% mortality at 4 months, whereas heterozygous mice are normal. A 6-month study was conducted in rasH2-Tg hemizygous mice to assess the potential carcinogenicity of BMS-986251. BMS-986251 was administered once daily by oral gavage to groups of 27 mice/sex at doses of 0 (water control), 0 (vehicle control), 5, 25, or 75 mg/kg. The positive control, N-methyl-N-nitrosourea, was administered by a single intraperitoneal injection to 15 mice/sex at a dose of 75 mg/kg. There were no tumors attributed to BMS-986251 except for thymic lymphomas. Thymic lymphoma was observed in 1 male (3.7%) and 3 females (11.1%) at the mid dose, and 6 females (22.2%) at the high dose. No lymphomas were observed in the negative control groups whereas the incidence of lymphomas in the positive control group was 47-60%. The incidence of thymic lymphomas in the BMS-986251-treated groups was higher than published literature and test facility historical control data. Furthermore, increased thymic lymphoid cellularity (lymphoid hyperplasia) was observed at the mid dose in males and at all doses in females. Since lymphoid hyperplasia may represent a preneoplastic change, a no-effect dose for potential tumor induction was not identified in this study. These results led to the discontinuation of BMS-986251 and underscore the challenges in targeting RORγt for drug development.

Nonclinical genotoxicity and carcinogenicity profile of apremilast, an oral selective inhibitor of PDE4

Apremilast is an oral, selective small molecule inhibitor of phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) that has been approved for the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis, moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, and for patients with oral ulcers associated with Behçet's disease. Apremilast modulates the inflammatory cascade in cells by inhibiting PDE4, thus preventing the degradation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate, resulting in the upregulation of interleukin (IL)-10 and the downregulation of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-23, interferon gamma (IFNγ), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα). Here, we evaluated the genotoxic and carcinogenic potential of apremilast using Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)-compliant in vitro and in vivo studies. Apremilast was not genotoxic in the genetic toxicology battery, as evaluated for mutagenicity in the Ames test up to concentrations of 5000 μg/plate, clastogenicity in cultured human peripheral blood lymphocytes up to concentrations of 700 ug/mL was in excess of the solubility limit in culture medium and not able to assess; and negative for the induction of micronuclei in the bone marrow micronucleus test in mice up to doses of 2000 mg/kg/day. Furthermore, apremilast did not increase the incidence of tumors in lifetime rat or mouse carcinogenicity studies up to the maximum tolerated dose. In summary, in non-clinical studies, apremilast is not genotoxic and is not carcinogenic.

Proposal to Eliminate Urethane-Treated Positive Control Dose Groups in 26-Week Tg.rasH2 Carcinogenicity Studies.

Short-term (26 weeks) Tg.rasH2 mouse carcinogenicity studies have been conducted as an alternative model to the conventional 2-year mouse carcinogenicity studies, using urethane as a positive control material. In these studies, urethane was used at a dose of 1,000 mg/kg/dose, administered intraperitoneally on days 1, 3, and 5. Urethane consistently produces lung adenomas and carcinomas and hemangiosarcomas of the spleen, proving validity of the assay. We conducted 3 pilot studies at 3 different sites of Charles River Laboratories using a lower dose of urethane (500 mg/kg/dose), administered on days 1, 3, and 5, followed by a 12-week observation period. Our results demonstrate that a lower dose can be used successfully with fewer number of animals per sex to prove the validity of the assay. However, based on our cumulative experience with this model, we propose to eliminate positive control dose groups in future Tg.rasH2 carcinogenicity studies.

Cell proliferation analysis is a reliable predictor of lack of carcinogenicity: Case study using the pyrethroid imiprothrin on lung tumorigenesis in mice

In the mouse carcinogenicity study, an apparent increase in lung adenocarcinoma was observed in male mice at 7000 ppm. Based on the overall evaluation of toxicology, oncology, pathology and statistics, we concluded that the apparent increase in lung tumors is not relevant for evaluation of carcinogenicity of imiprothrin (Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 105, 1–14, 2019). To investigate whether imiprothrin has any mitogenic effect on mouse Club cells, the present study examined its effects on replicative DNA synthesis of Club cells and lung histopathology in male mice treated with imiprothrin for 7 days at 3500 and 7000 ppm in the diet. Isoniazid, a known mouse lung mitogen and tumor inducer, was also examined at 1000 ppm in the diet as a positive control of Club cell mitogenesis and morphological changes. Neither imiprothrin nor isoniazid caused any necrotic changes in lung by light or electron microscopy. There were no increases observed in the bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) labeling index in the imiprothrin groups, while there was a statistically significant increase in the BrdU labeling index in the isoniazid group. These findings demonstrate that imiprothrin does not induce mouse Club cell proliferation or morphologic changes, supporting our previous conclusion described above. Thus, imiprothrin should not be classified as a carcinogen. Furthermore, this study indicates that short-term studies focusing on cell proliferation can be reliable for predicting a lack of carcinogenic potential of test chemicals.

Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity risk assessment of prucalopride, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine 4 receptor agonist

Prucalopride, a high affinity, selective serotonin type 4 (5-HT4) receptor agonist, was associated with increased neoplasia incidence (in endocrine tissues and liver) in 2-year rodent bioassays, without evidence of a genotoxic mechanism of action. Proposed mechanisms of action involve prolactin and the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR). Epigenetic mechanisms and their relevance to humans are discussed. Data from in vitro and in vivo rodent studies demonstrated that prucalopride-related stimulation of prolactin secretion (via dopamine receptor D2 antagonism at high doses) is a rodent-specific, non-genotoxic mechanism for inducing hyperplasia and neoplasia in prolactin receptor-expressing endocrine tissues. Additional data demonstrated that CAR-mediated liver enzyme induction underlies the observed hepatocellular adenomas and thyroid follicular adenomas in rodents. A 12-month neonatal mouse carcinogenicity study confirmed the lack of a genotoxic mechanism of action. Furthermore, tumors were observed only at very high exposures (200 and 63 fold higher in mice and rats, respectively, than human exposure after a daily therapeutic dose of 2 mg). The studies indicate that non-genotoxic, rodent-specific, epigenetic mechanisms that are considered clinically irrelevant are responsible for the increased incidence of neoplasias associated with very high exposure to prucalopride in rodents, and that prucalopride does not pose a carcinogenic safety risk to humans.

Carcinogenicity Assessment of Daprodustat (GSK1278863), a Hypoxia-Inducible Factor (HIF)-Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor.

Daprodustat (GSK1278863) is a hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-prolyl hydroxylase (PHD) inhibitor in development for treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease. Daprodustat's biological activity simulates components of the natural response to hypoxia; inhibition of PHDs results in HIF stabilization and modulation of HIF-controlled gene products, including erythropoietin. The carcinogenic potential of daprodustat was evaluated in 2-year carcinogenicity studies in Sprague-Dawley rats and CD-1 mice, where once-daily doses were administered. The mouse study also included evaluation of daprodustat's 3 major circulating human metabolites. There were no neoplastic findings that were considered treatment related in either study. Exaggerated pharmacology resulted in significantly increased red cell mass and subsequent multiorgan congestion and secondary non-neoplastic effects in both species, similar to those observed in chronic toxicity studies. In rats, these included aortic thrombosis and an exacerbation of spontaneous rodent cardiomyopathy, which contributed to a statistically significant decrease in survival in high-dose males (group terminated in week 94). Survival was not impacted in mice at any dose. Systemic exposures (area under the plasma concentration-time curve) to daprodustat at the high doses in rats and mice exceed predicted maximal human clinical exposure by ≥143-fold. These results suggest that daprodustat and metabolites do not pose a carcinogenic risk at clinical doses.

Cancer risk estimation of glycidol based on rodent carcinogenicity studies, a multiplicative risk model and in vivo dosimetry

Here we evaluate a multiplicative (relative) risk model for improved cancer risk estimation of genotoxic compounds. According to this model, cancer risk is proportional to the background tumor incidence and to the internal dose of the genotoxic compound. Furthermore, the relative risk coefficient per internal dose is considered to be approximately the same across tumor sites, sex, and species.In the present study, we demonstrate that the relative risk model is valid for cancer risk estimation of glycidol, a common food contaminant. Published tumor data from glycidol carcinogenicity studies in mice and rats were evaluated in combination with internal dose estimates from hemoglobin adduct measurements in blood from mice and rats treated with glycidol in short-term studies. A good agreement between predicted and observed tumor incidence in responding sites was demonstrated in the animals, supporting a relative risk coefficient that is independent of tumor site, sex, and species. There was no significant difference between the risk coefficients for mice (5.1% per mMh) and rats (5.4% per mMh) when considering internal doses of glycidol. Altogether, this mechanism-based risk model gives a reliable risk coefficient, which then was extrapolated to humans considering internal dose, and background cancer incidence.

Pathogenesis of Renal Injury and Gene Expression Changes in the Male CD-1 Mouse Associated with Exposure to Empagliflozin.

An increased incidence of renal tubular adenomas and carcinomas was identified in the 2-year CD-1 mouse carcinogenicity study with empagliflozin (sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitor) in high dose (1,000 mg/kg/day) male mice. A 13-week mouse renal investigative pathogenesis study was conducted with empagliflozin to evaluate dose dependency and temporal onset of nonneoplastic degenerative/regenerative renal tubular and molecular (genes, pathways) changes which precede neoplasia. Male and female CD-1 mice were given daily oral doses of 0, 100, 300, or 1,000 mg/kg/day (corresponding carcinogenicity study dose levels) for 1, 2, 4, 8, or 13 weeks. The maximum expected pharmacology with secondary osmotic diuresis was observed by week 1 at ≥100 mg/kg/day in both genders. Histopathologic kidney changes were first detected after 4 weeks of dosing in the male 1,000 mg/kg/day dose group, with progressive increases in the incidence and/or number of findings in this dose group so that they were more readily detected during weeks 8 and 13. Changes detected starting on week 4 consisted of minimal single-cell necrosis and minimal increases in mitotic figures. These changes persisted at an increased incidence at weeks 8 and 13 and were accompanied by minimal to mild tubular epithelial karyomegaly, minimal proximal convoluted tubular epithelial cell hyperplasia, and a corresponding increase in Ki-67-positive nuclei in epithelial cells of the proximal convoluted tubules. There were no corresponding changes in serum chemistry or urinalysis parameters indicative of any physiologically meaningful effect on renal function and thus these findings were not considered to be adverse. Similar changes were not identified in lower-dose groups in males nor were they present in females of any dose group. RNA-sequencing analysis revealed male mouse-specific changes in kidney over 13 weeks of dosing at 1,000 mg/kg/day. Treatment-related changes included genes and pathways related to p53-regulated cell cycle and proliferation, transforming growth factor β, oxidative stress, and renal injury and the number of genes with significant expression change dramatically increased at week 13. These treatment-related changes in genes and pathways were predominant in high-dose males and complemented the observed temporal renal tubular changes. Overall, these mouse investigative study results support the role of early empagliflozin-related degenerative/regenerative changes only observed in high-dose male CD-1 mice as a key contributing feature to a nongenotoxic mode of renal tumor pathogenesis.

Contribution of mouse carcinogenicity study for safety assessment of pesticide approved in Japan

Contribution of mouse carcinogenicity study for safety assessment of pesticide approved in Japan

Re-evaluation of sodium nitrate (E 251) and potassium nitrate (E 252) as food additives.

The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provided a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of sodium nitrate (E 251) and potassium nitrate (E 252) when used as food additives. The current acceptable daily intakes (ADIs) for nitrate of 3.7 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day were established by the SCF (1997) and JECFA (2002). The available data did not indicate genotoxic potential for sodium and potassium nitrate. The carcinogenicity studies in mice and rats were negative. The Panel considered the derivation of an ADI for nitrate based on the formation of methaemoglobin, following the conversion of nitrate, excreted in the saliva, to nitrite. However, there were large variations in the data on the nitrate‐to‐nitrite conversion in the saliva in humans. Therefore, the Panel considered that it was not possible to derive a single value of the ADI from the available data. The Panel noticed that even using the highest nitrate‐to‐nitrite conversion factor the methaemoglobin levels produced due to nitrite obtained from this conversion would not be clinically significant and would result to a theoretically estimated endogenous N‐nitroso compounds (ENOC) production at levels which would be of low concern. Hence, and despite the uncertainty associated with the ADI established by the SCF, the Panel concluded that currently there was insufficient evidence to withdraw this ADI. The exposure to nitrate solely from its use as a food additive was estimated to be less than 5% of the overall exposure to nitrate in food based on a refined estimated exposure scenario. This exposure did not exceed the current ADI (SCF, 1997). However, if all sources of exposure to dietary nitrate are considered (food additive, natural presence and contamination), the ADI would be exceeded for all age groups at the mean and the highest exposure.

Tg.rasH2 Mice and not CByB6F1 Mice Should Be Used for 28-Day Dose Range Finding Studies Prior to 26-Week Tg.rasH2 Carcinogenicity Studies.

Our recent retrospective analysis of data, collected from 29 Tg.rasH2 mouse carcinogenicity studies, determined how successful the strategy of choosing the high dose for the 26-week studies was based on the estimated maximum tolerated dose (EMTD) derived from earlier 28-day dose range finding (DRF) studies conducted in CByB6F1 mice. Our analysis demonstrated that the high doses applied at EMTD in the 26-week Tg.rasH2 studies failed to detect carcinogenic effects. To investigate why the dose selection process failed in the 26-week carcinogenicity studies, the initial body weights, terminal body weights, body weight gains, food consumption, and mortality from the first 4 weeks of 26-week studies with Tg.rasH2 mice were compared with 28-day DRF studies conducted with CByB6F1 mice. Both the 26-week and the earlier respective 28-day studies were conducted with the exact same vehicle, test article, and similar dose levels. The analysis of our results further emphasizes that the EMTD and subsequent lower doses, determined on the basis of the 28-day studies in CByB6F1 mice, may not be an accurate strategy for selecting appropriate dose levels for the 26-week carcinogenicity studies in Tg.rasH2 mice. Based on the analysis presented in this article, we propose that the Tg.rasH2 mice and not the CByB6F1 mice should be used in future DRF studies. The Tg.rasH2 mice demonstrate more toxicity than the CByB6F1 mice, possibly because of their smaller size compared to CByB6F1 mice. Also, the Tg.rasH2 males appear to be more sensitive than the female Tg.rasH2 mice.

Statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse carcinogenicity study on sucralose (E955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute.

The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) was requested from the European Commission to provide a statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse study on the carcinogenic potential of sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute (Soffritti et al., 2016). Sucralose (E 955) is authorised as a food additive in the EU in accordance with Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 on food additives. According to Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010, the full re‐evaluation of sucralose shall be completed by December 2020. Taking into consideration the publication from Soffritti et al. (2016), the technical report and additional information provided by the Ramazzini Institute and other information available for sucralose (E 955), the Panel noted: (i) the design of the bioassay that considers exposure from gestation up to natural death of animals implies an increase in background pathology that results in the possibility of misclassifications and a difficult interpretation of data, especially in the absence of both an appropriate concurrent control group and a recent historical database; (ii) the lack of a dose–response relationship between the exposure to sucralose and incidence of lymphomas and leukaemias (combined); (iii) the lack of a mode of action and failure to meet all the Bradford‐Hill considerations for a cause–effect relationship between intake of sucralose and the development of tumours in male mice only; (iv) a comprehensive database was available for sucralose and no carcinogenic effect was reported in adequate studies in rats and mice. Moreover, there was no reliable evidence of in vivo genotoxicity. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the available data did not support the conclusions of the authors (Soffritti et al., 2016) that sucralose induced haematopoietic neoplasias in male Swiss mice.

Non-clinical safety evaluation and risk assessment to human of aleglitazar, a dual PPAR α/γ agonist, and its major human metabolite

The non-clinical safety profile of aleglitazar, a peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha/gamma agonist, and its major human metabolite M6 was studied in a complete package consisting of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics characterization, safety pharmacology, genotoxicity, repeat dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity and carcinogenicity studies. These studies identified the following main targets similar to other PPAR agonists: red blood cell parameters, liver, heart, kidney, ovaries, testes, bone marrow, adipose tissue, and fluid accumulation. Additionally, and in the 12-month monkey study only, an increased incidence of generalized hair loss/thinning was observed in all groups including controls. In the rat carcinogenicity study there was no statistically significant increase in tumors. In the mouse carcinogenicity study, there was an increased incidence of angiomatous tumors and there were three males with gallbladder adenoma. No relevant compound-related effects were observed in safety pharmacology, genotoxicity, and a 28-day immunotoxicity rat study. Effects observed in reproductive toxicity studies were similar to those known for other PPARγ agonists. Separate studies with the human metabolite M6 did not reveal findings that would prevent human dosing. Overall, the results from the non-clinical safety studies conducted with aleglitazar and the human metabolite M6 were considered to support the clinical Phase 3 program.

Exact Statistical Tests on Comparing Tumor Incidence Trend in Transgenic Mouse Carcinogenicity Studies

ABSTRACTStatistical positive trend tests to predict drugs' tumorigenic potential for long-term carcinogenicity studies, for example, Peto's test, are well accepted in practice and by regulatory agencies. Recently, short-term transgenic mouse studies become widely used as an alternative to lifetime mouse carcinogenicity studies. In general, the tumor incidence rates in a short-term study are much lower than those for a traditional long-term study, so exact positive trend test should be used. However, little is discussed about exact statistical trend tests for transgenic mouse studies. In this article, we evaluated three types of exact methods for testing tumor trend via simulation: exact Cochran-Armitage (C-A) test, exact Peto's test, and a proposed conditional exact Poly-k test. We show, via a simulations study, that the Type I error rate and statistical power are very similar for these three exact tests under various mortality rates and tumorigenic patterns. Overall, we recommend using exact C-A test to compare tumor incidence trend for short-term transgenic mouse studies. When survival adjustment is needed, the proposed conditional exact Poly-k test can be used as an alternative.

Folpet (Pesticides).

Food Safety Commission of Japan (FSCJ) conducted a risk assessment of folpet (CAS No. 133-07-3), a phthalimide fungicide, based on results from various studies. Major adverse effects of folpet were observed in hyper-keratosis in rats and in duodenal mucosal hyperplasia in mice. No neurotoxicity and adverse effect on fertility were detected. Increases in the incidence of duodenal adenoma and adenocarcinoma were identified in carcinogenicity studies in mice. FSCJ recognized no genotoxicity relevant to human health of folpet in spite of the positive results in vitro. Therefore, a genotoxic mechanism was unlikely involved in the tumor development, and it enabled us to establish a threshold in the assessment. In developmental toxicity studies, no adverse effects observed in fetus at the dose without maternal toxicity. No folpet-induced teratogenicity was detected in rats. Folpet (parent compound only) was identified as the residue definition for dietary risk assessment in agricultural products. The lowest no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) obtained in all the studies was 10 mg/kg bw/day in several studies in dogs, rats and rabbits. FSCJ specified an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 0.1 mg/kg bw/day by applying a safety factor of 100 to the NOAEL. The lowest NOAEL for potential adverse effects of a single oral administration of folpet was 10 mg/kg bw/day in a developmental toxicity study in rabbits. FSCJ specified an acute reference dose (ARfD) of 0.1 mg/kg bw/day, for women who are or may be pregnant, by applying a safety factor of 100 to the NOAEL. FSCJ considered it unnecessary to specify ARfD for general population.

Is necessary mouse carcinogenicity study for safety assessment of pesticide?

Is necessary mouse carcinogenicity study for safety assessment of pesticide?

農薬評価におけるマウス発がん性試験の必要性、II. マウス発がん性のヒトへの外挿性検討

農薬評価におけるマウス発がん性試験の必要性、II. マウス発がん性のヒトへの外挿性検討

農薬評価におけるマウス発がん性試験の必要性、I. ラット発がん性試験に追加の意義

農薬評価におけるマウス発がん性試験の必要性、I. ラット発がん性試験に追加の意義