Capsulolabral Repair Research Articles

Arthroscopic selective approach to dynamic posterior shoulder instability: long-term follow-up insights

AimsEvaluate outcomes of arthroscopic capsulolabral repair in patients with structural dynamic posterior instability (Moroder classification B2), analyzing factors associated with inferior clinical outcomes or recurrence. The primary hypothesis is that this surgical approach in patients without static structural changes such as excessive glenoid retroversion or dysplastic glenoids will result in satisfactory clinical outcomes and low failure rates. MethodsObservational retrospective analysis in patients diagnosed with posterior structural dynamic instability who underwent arthroscopic capsulolabral repair. Demographic, clinical and radiologic characteristics were registered as well as patient reported outcomes, satisfaction, complications and failure with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Association between these outcomes and preoperative factors was investigated. Results21 patients were included, with an average age of 38.1 years (range 27-51) and a mean follow-up of 68.7 months (range 24-127). At final follow-up the degree of instability was 0 in 19 (90.5%) patients. Overall outcome assessment demonstrated a mean SSV of 82.3 (±15.2), mean WOSI score of 460.1 (±471) and a mean 91.5 (±13) ROWE score. Furthermore, a significant portion of patients returned to sport 71.4% at any level and 57.1% at previous level, and 71.4% reported satisfaction with treatment, while 5 patients (23.8%) had criteria for failure. ConclusionArthroscopic capsulolabral repair in selected patients with type B2 posterior shoulder instability without static posterior findings yielded satisfactory clinical outcomes and low failure rates.

Outcomes of primary arthroscopic shoulder stabilization in active patients over 40—results at a mean follow-up of 7 years

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to report clinical outcomes, return to activity, redislocation rate, and rate of conversion to arthroplasty for active patients over age 40 undergoing primary arthroscopic shoulder stabilization. MethodsPatients over 40 years of age who underwent arthroscopic capsulolabral repair for shoulder instability between December 2005 and January 2018 with a minimum of 2-year postoperative follow-up were enrolled in this retrospective, monocentric study. Clinical outcome scores including the 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and VAS pain were collected. Additionally, it was determined which patients reached the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for the ASES score. Bivariate analysis was utilized to determine if there was any association between baseline demographic and clinical factors with the outcome scores. ResultsOf a total of 814 patients assessed for eligibility, a total of 40 patients were included and 33 patients (8 females) were available for follow-up. Average age was 49.4 ± 7.6 years. At an average follow-up of 7.0 ± 3.6 years, all the outcome scores significantly improved compared to baseline. These include ASES (69.9 ± 19 to 95.8 ± 7.6, p<.001), QuickDASH (29.7 ± 17.7 to 3.9 ± 5.4, p<.002); SANE (53.5 ± 29.3 to 91.6 ± 14.3, p<.003), SF-12 (45.6± 8.8 to 55.2 ± 5.7, p<.001) and VAS (2.1 ± 2.1 to 0.3 ± 1, p<.002). MCID was reached by 72.7% of the patients and 81.8% reached the PASS threshold for the ASES score. Postoperative shoulder stability improved substantially and significantly. Median postoperative satisfaction was 10/10 (range 1-10). 95.6% of the patients returned to sport, with 91.0% of the patients able to return to pre-injury level. One patient (3%) underwent revision surgery for osteoarthritis, in the form of comprehensive arthroscopic management procedure. The presence of cartilage defects cartilage defects Outerbridge grade >2 (p=0.020) and posterior labral lesions (p=0.03) at index surgery were significantly associated with inferior outcomes in the ASES score. ConclusionActive patients aged 40 years and older undergoing arthroscopic shoulder stabilization experienced favorable functional outcomes at a mean follow-up of 7 years, with low rates of revision surgery or of progression to clinically relevant osteoarthritis. However, the presence of high-grade cartilage lesions and the presence of a posterior labral tear were associated with inferior clinical outcomes.

Clinical and radiological outcome following arthroscopic Latarjet with cerclage FiberTape fixation with a minimum 1-year follow-up

The rates of implant-related complications are significant following the Latarjet procedure using metal screws in patients with recurrent shoulder dislocation and bone loss. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the short-term outcome following the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure using cerclage FiberTape (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) combined with remplissage and capsulolabral repair. It was hypothesized that performing the procedure with cerclage FiberTape would provide sturdy fixation, comparable to the conventional method of using metal screws, while averting hardware-related complications attributed to the latter in published literature. A prospective study was performed in a single institution between 2020 and 2022, with all surgeries performed by a single fellowship-trained shoulder surgeon who has ample experience in performing arthroscopic screw Latarjet procedures. Patient demographics, number of dislocations before surgery, arm dominance, ligamentous laxity, type of sporting activity, Instability Severity Index Score, and percentage of bone loss on the glenoid and humeral sides were recorded. The patients were followed up with visual analog scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Rowe score, and Walch-Duplay score preoperatively and postoperatively. The coracoid graft position, healing, and remodeling were assessed with computed tomography scans at 3 months postoperatively. Minimum clinical follow-up was for a period of one year. Overall, 10 patients (all males, average age 28±8.8 years) were operated on with an arthroscopic Latarjet procedure using cerclage FiberTape. The minimum follow-up period was 12 months, and the mean follow-up was 13.2 months. The median and individual visual analog scores during arm motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Rowe scores, and Walch-Duplay scores improved in the follow-up period. Computed tomography scans at 3 months showed flushed graft position in 5 patients, medial graft position in two patients, and three patients showed graft nonunion with migration. Out of 10 patients, seven had good graft union in follow-up scans. None of the patients required revision surgery. All three patients with graft nonunion were kept under follow-up beyond the study period for recurrence of instability. Our study demonstrated that arthroscopic Latarjet using cerclage FiberTape fixation combined with remplissage and capsulolabral repair resulted in high rate of graft loosening and migration (30%). Nonetheless, patients in whom the coracoid graft had united, as well as those in whom it had not, all had good to excellent functional and clinical outcomes, no complications, and did not require any revision surgery.

Posterior Shoulder Instability and Glenoid Bone Loss: A Review and a Free Bone Graft Technique.

Posterior glenoid bone loss (pGBL) is frequently associated with posterior shoulder instability. Posterior glenohumeral instability accounts for a small percentage of shoulder pathologies, and critical bone loss in posterior instability has not been well defined in the literature. Younger patient populations who participate in activities that repetitively stress the posterior stabilizing structures of the shoulder are more prone to developing posterior shoulder instability. A variety of surgical options have been described, ranging from isolated capsulolabral repair to glenoid osteotomy. Soft-tissue repair alone may be an inadequate treatment in cases of pGBL and places patients at a high risk of recurrence. Our preferred technique for posterior glenoid reconstruction in cases of pGBL involves the transfer of a free iliac crest bone graft onto the native glenoid. The graft is contoured to fit the osseous defect and secured to provide an extension of the glenoid track. In this study, we review pGBL in the setting of posterior instability and describe our technique in detail. Further long-term studies are needed to refine the indications for glenoid bone graft procedures and quantify what constitutes a critical pGBL.

All-Suture Anchor vs. Knotless Suture Anchor for the Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Instability-A Prospective Cohort Study.

All-suture or soft-anchors (SA) represent a new generation of suture anchor technology with a completely suture-based system. This study's objective was to assess Juggerknot® SA, for arthroscopic Bankart repair in recurrent shoulder instability (RSI), and to compare it to a commonly performed knotless anchor (KA) technique (Pushlock®). In a prospective cohort study, 30 consecutive patients scheduled for reconstruction of the capsulolabral complex without substantial glenoid bone loss were included and operated on using the SA technique. A historical control group was operated on using the KA technique for the same indication. Clinical examinations were performed preoperatively and 12 and 24 months postoperatively. RSI and WOSI at 24 months were the co-primary endpoints, evaluated with logistic and linear regression. A total of 5 out of 30 (16.7%) patients suffered from RSI in the SA group, one out of 31 (3.2%) in the KA group (adjusted odds ratio = 10.12, 95% CI: 0.89-115.35), and 13.3% in the SA group and 3.2% in the KAgroup had a revision. The median WOSI in the SA group was lower than in the KA group (81% vs. 95%) (adjusted regression coefficient = 10.12, 95% CI: 0.89-115.35). Arthroscopic capsulolabral repair for RSI using either the SA or KA technique led to satisfying clinical outcomes. However, there is a tendency for higher RSI and lower WOSI following the SA technique.

Outcomes of Arthroscopic Posterior Capsulolabral Repair in Patients with Traumatic Recurrent Posterior Instability of Shoulder

Outcomes of Arthroscopic Posterior Capsulolabral Repair in Patients with Traumatic Recurrent Posterior Instability of Shoulder

Arthroscopic Posterior Glenoid Reconstruction With Distal Clavicle Bone-Block

Posterior glenoid bone loss is a potential cause for failure in arthroscopic capsulolabral repair. Although multiple techniques have been described to reconstruct posterior bone defects, they do not reliably yield improved patient outcomes and have high complication rates. We present a technique to reconstruct posterior glenoid bone loss using a distal clavicle autologous bone graft harvested by a mini-open approach and secured arthroscopically with suture buttons. The graft is positioned extra-articularly by repairing the posterior labral complex with a knotless fixation using labral tape.

Does glenoid version affect the post-operative clinical outcome after repair of posterior labral tear: A retrospective study

IntroductionPosterior shoulder instability and consequent labral tear have been predominantly associated with retroversion of the bony glenoid and chondrolabral version. However, literature concerning the degree of glenoid and chondrolabral version and clinical outcomes following labral repair is scarce. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was undertaken among patients with posterior shoulder instability who had undergone arthroscopic isolated posterior labral repair. The MRI was used to assess the bony and labral variations of the glenoid using the Friedman method and further categorized as either anteverted or retroverted glenoid. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores were used to evaluate pre- and postoperative clinical outcomes at a minimum follow-up of one year. Results33 shoulder MRIs performed at our institution were available for radiographic analysis. Among the 33 shoulders that underwent posterior shoulder capsulolabral repair, 23 were available for clinical follow-up for at least one year (range, 12–108 months). The mean (±SD) labral version and bony version were −3.98 (±5.68) and −2.83 (±5.20), respectively. The mean (±SD) postoperative ASES, Oxford score, and SANE scores for all participants were 84.04 (±14.14), 43.38 (±3.81), and 78.57 (±17.40), respectively. However, the difference in clinical outcomes in patients with anteverted or retroverted glenoid versions was not statistically significant. ConclusionOur study concludes a strong correlation between posterior glenohumeral instability and higher degree of glenoid retroversion. Nevertheless, variations in the glenoid version appear to have no significant impact on clinical outcomes. Level of studyLevel IV, retrospective cohort.

A study on Subscapularis augmented Bankart repair (SB) vs capsulo-labral Bankart repair (CB) for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with moderate glenoid bone loss (< 20 %) in non-athletepopulation

Introduction- Subscapularis augmented Bankart repair (SB) is a novel arthroscopic technique of tenodesis of upper 1/3rd fibers of subscapularis tendon to capsulo-labral repair of Bankart lesion. Treatment of Bony Bankart lesion with glenoid bone loss % (GBL%) 10%–20 % is still a grey zone where bone augmentation procedures are an overtreatment and capsulo-labral repair is associated with high recurrence. MethodologyA retrospective study of 30 patients with h/o anterior instability with GBL%<20 % were classified into two groups. SB group included patients managed with arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation while CB group included patients managed with arthroscopic capsulo-labral repair. These patients were followed up after a minimum of 24 months post-surgery and functional outcomes evaluated using WOSI, ASES and ROWE scores. ResultsPatients in the SB group showed superior functional outcomes for WOSI and ROWE scores. Considering postoperative shoulder pain, the median ROWE-P (pain) score was better for SB group (10/10) when compared to CB group (5/10). Patients under SB group were more comfortable with physical symptoms of their shoulder (WOSI-P average 60/1000) and were more likely to continue their recreational sports activity (WOSI- sports for SB 63.7 and CB 119.5. In our study, none of the 15 SB patients had any restriction in range of shoulder movements [ROWE-M score of 10]. Subscapularis augmented Bankart repair is associated with minimal restriction of shoulder range, better pain relief, better acceptability and smoother return to daily living and occupation and can be considered as a routine for every patient with GBL<20 %.

Comparison of 1- and 3-Week Immobilization Following Arthroscopic Shoulder Stabilization: Results of a Prospective Study

Purpose: We investigated the effects of 1- and 3-week of absolute immobilization duration on pain, range of motion (ROM), shoulder function, and recurrence rate on shoulder arthroscopic anterior capsulolabral repair (AACR) patients. Method: Fifty shoulder AACR patients’ pain intensity, shoulder ROM, and function were evaluated 4, 8, and 12 weeks after surgery (1-week group: 26; 3-week group: 24 patients). Function was assessed with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score at postoperative 12 weeks and final follow-up (average of postoperative 30 months). Whether there was a re-dislocation after surgery was also questioned at final follow-up. Results: Similar ROM were observed on both groups at the postoperative 4, 8, and 12 weeks ( p &gt; 0.05). Pain intensities at rest ( p = 0.40), night ( p = 0.22), and during the activity ( p = 0.49) were also similar on both groups. Also, no difference was observed for function between the two groups ( p = 0.99). Only one re-dislocation was in the 3-week immobilization group. Conclusion: Both 1- and 3-week of absolute immobilization demonstrated similar results in terms of shoulder ROM, pain, function, and recurrence rate after the shoulder AACR. Furthermore, earlier mobilization led to higher shoulder flexion at 4 weeks postoperatively. Either of the rehabilitation approaches can be adopted based on the patient's situation.

Correlation of Acromial Morphology With Risk and Direction of Shoulder Instability: An MRI Study

Background: The influence of bony morphology on the development of posterior shoulder instability is not well known. Purpose: To determine if acromial morphology, as measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is associated with posterior or anterior shoulder instability. Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: MRI measurements of posterior acromial coverage (PAC), posterior acromial height (PAH), posterior acromial tilt (PAT), and anterior acromial coverage (AAC) were completed for 3 separate matched groups who underwent surgical intervention: posterior instability, anterior instability, and a comparison group of patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery for snapping scapula. Inclusion criteria were patients with recurrent instability <40 years of age without multidirectional instability, glenoid bone loss >13.5%, or glenoid retroversion >10%. Results: Overall, 37 patients were included in each group. PAC was significantly less in the posterior instability group than in the anterior instability and comparison groups (68.3° vs 88.7° vs 81.7°; P < .001). PAH was significantly greater in the posterior group than in the anterior instability group (11.0 mm vs −0.1 mm; P < .001) and comparison group (0.7 mm; P < .001). There was no difference between the posterior and anterior groups in terms of PAT or AAC (P = .45 and P = .05, respectively). PAT was significantly smaller in the posterior instability group than the comparison group (55.2° vs 62.2°; P = .026). The anterior and comparison groups were not significantly different in PAH or PAT (P = .874 and P = .067, respectively) but were significantly different in AAC (P = .026). Conclusion: A higher and flatter posterior acromion, as measured on preoperative MRI, appears to be associated with patients who require arthroscopic capsulolabral repair due to posterior shoulder instability. This information may help clinicians to both diagnose and predict the need for operative intervention for patients with posterior labral tears.

Arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair grants adequate outcomes in shoulders with posterior instability without glenoid cartilage lesions.

Posterior capsulolabral repair (posterior Bankart) is effective to restore shoulder stability and relieve pain, though a recent meta-analysis reported recurrent instability in 9.5% of patients, and that only 62.7% were able to resume sports. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair in a population of unselected patients, in terms of recurrence of instability, clinical scores, and return to sports. The authors retrospectively studied a consecutive series of 22 patients that underwent posterior capsulolabral repair between 2009 and 2019. Patients were assessed before posterior capsulolabral repair and at a minimum follow-up of 24months, in terms of subjective shoulder value (SSV), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), as well as level of sport. Following surgery, all complications, reoperations or episodes of instability were noted. The cohort comprised 21 men (95%) and 1 woman (5%), aged 38.8 ± 12.5years (range 17-61) at index surgery. Of the 20 patients that performed sports, only 2 (10%) stopped sports after surgery, while 18 resumed their main sport (90%). At a follow-up of 65.4 ± 34.8months (range 25-146), the SSV was 85.1 ± 14.7, pain on VAS was 1.9 ± 2.1, and the Constant-Murley score was 71.6 ± 17.9. Five patients had subjective instability without dislocation (23%). Nine patients (41%) had no pain (0 points), 6 patients (27%) had mild pain (1-2 points), 4 patients (18%) had moderate pain (3 points), while 3 patients (14%) had severe pain (5-8 points). Arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair prevented recurrent dislocation in patients with posterior shoulder instability at a minimum follow-up of 2years, despite persistent pain in 32%, and subjective instability in 23%. These complications were mainly observed in patients with work-related accidents and glenoid cartilage lesions. III, case series.

Outcomes After Revision Posterior Shoulder Capsulolabral Repair in Adolescent Athletes.

Few studies have evaluated the outcomes of posterior arthroscopic capsulolabral repair in adolescents, especially with regard to outcomes after revision repair. Adolescent athletes who undergo revision arthroscopic posterior unidirectional capsulolabral repair will have similar outcomes and return to play when compared with adolescent athletes who underwent primary arthroscopic posterior unidirectional capsulolabral repair. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Data were reviewed from patients who underwent posterior shoulder stabilization between 2000 and 2019 and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients <11 and >19 years of age and those with multidirectional instability were excluded. Revision surgery was defined as repeat arthroscopic posterior capsular repair. The ability to return to sport (and level of sport), clinical outcomes scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] and visual analog scale for pain), and patient-reported perception of range of motion, strength, and satisfaction were recorded. Comparisons between the primary and revision cohorts were made using the chi-square or the Mann-Whitney U test. Included were 180 adolescent patients (182 shoulders) who underwent a primary unidirectional posterior stabilization, with an average follow-up of 6.1 years. Of these patients, 17 patients required revision surgery (9.3% revision rate). At the final follow-up, patients who underwent revision surgery returned to sport at similar rates to those who did not (70.6% vs 85.9%; P = .095) and were similarly likely to return to their presurgery level of play (41.1% vs 23.7%; P = .10). The no-revision patients had higher ASES scores (76.1 vs 87.1; P = .007) as well as less pain and improved subjective range of motion scores. However, both groups had similar subjective strength scores, and both reported that surgical repair was satisfactory (no revision, 93.2% vs revision, 88.2%; P = .45). Adolescent athletes had a low risk of revision surgery and frequently returned to play after arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair, often at a lower level of play. Those who required revision surgery had poorer outcome scores but still reported a high rate of satisfaction.

Trends and projections in surgical stabilization of glenohumeral instability in the United States from 2009 to 2030: rise of the Latarjet procedure and fall of open Bankart repair.

Advances in surgical techniques have improved the ability to address recurrent glenohumeral instability via arthroscopic capsulolabral repair and bone-restoring procedures such as the Latarjet procedure. Given the paucity of studies analyzing temporal trends in the surgical management of glenohumeral instability, the purpose of this study was to assess trends in the treatment of anterior, posterior, and multidirectional instability over a 10-year period and model projections to 2030. Using the IBM Watson MarketScan national database, we identified all patients who underwent glenohumeral instability procedures from 2009 to 2018. Procedures were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes for open Bankart, Latarjet, anterior bone block, posterior bone block, multidirectional capsular shift, and arthroscopic Bankart procedures. Sample weights provided by the database were used to calculate national estimates. US Census Bureau annual population data were used to calculate incidence. Future projections to 2030 were modeled using Poisson and linear regression. There were an estimated 446,072 glenohumeral instability cases from 2009 to 2018. The per capita incidence (per 100,000) remained constant, from 14.8 in 2009 to 14.5 in 2018. Arthroscopic Bankart procedures comprised the highest number of procedures throughout the study period, accounting for 89% of all procedures in 2009 and 93% in 2018. The number of open Bankart procedures decreased by 65% from 2009 to 2018, whereas the number of Latarjet procedures showed a 250% increase over the same period. Patient demographics did not change over the study period, and male patients aged 18-25 years comprised the largest demographic group undergoing anterior instability procedures. Multidirectional instability procedures exhibited the least pronounced sex differences. Future modeling from 2018 to 2030 projected a continued steady rise in arthroscopic Bankart procedures (from 40,000 to 49,000 cases/yr), rapid growth in Latarjet procedures (from 1370 to 4300 cases/yr), and continued decline in open Bankart procedures (from 1000 to 250 cases/yr). Arthroscopic Bankart repair continues to be the most common glenohumeral instability procedure in the United States. From 2009 to 2018, the incidence of open Bankart procedures declined whereas the incidence of Latarjet procedures markedly increased. Future projections to 2030 mirrored these findings. These data may provide an enhanced understanding of the evolution of surgical treatment of glenohumeral instability within the United States, laying the foundation for continued prospective studies into the appropriate indications and advancements in surgical techniques.

Poster 201: Trends and Projections in Surgical Stabilization of Glenohumeral Instability in the United States from 2009 to 2030: Rise of the Latarjet and Fall of the Open Bankart

Objectives: Advances in surgical techniques have improved the ability to addressrecurrent glenohumeral instability via arthroscopic capsulolabral repair and bonerestoring procedures such as Latarjet. Given the paucity of studies analyzing temporaltrends in surgical management of glenohumeral instability, the purpose of this studywas to assess trends in treatment of anterior, posterior, and multidirectional instabilityover a 10-year period and model projections to 2030. Methods: Using IBM Watson Marketscan national database, all patients thatunderwent glenohumeral instability procedures from 2009 to 2018 were identified.Procedures were identified using common procedural terminology (CPT) codes foropen Bankart Repair, Latarjet, anterior bone block, posterior bone block,multidirectional capsular shift, and arthroscopic Bankart procedures. Sample weightsprovided by the database were utilized to calculate national estimates. The UnitedStates (U.S.) Census Bureau annual population data were utilized for calculatingincidence. Future projections to 2030 were modeled using Poisson and linearregression. Results: There were an estimated 446,072 glenohumeral instability cases from 2009-2018. Per capita (per 100,000) incidence remained constant, from 14.8 in 2009 to 14.5in 2018. Arthroscopic Bankart comprised the highest number of procedures throughoutthe study period, accounting for 89% of all procedures in 2009 and 93% in 2018. OpenBankart procedures decreased by 65% from 2009 to 2018, while there was a 250%increase in Latarjet procedures over the same period. Patient demographics did notchange over the study period, and males aged 18-25 comprised the largestdemographic group undergoing anterior instability procedures. Multidirectionalinstability procedures exhibited the least pronounced gender differences. Futuremodeling from 2018-2030 projected continued steady rise in arthroscopic Bankart(40,000-49,000 case/yr), rapid growth in Latarjet (1370-4300 cases/yr), and continueddecline in open Bankart (1000-250 cases/yr) procedures. Conclusions: Arthroscopic Bankart continues to be the most common glenohumeralinstability procedure in the U.S. From 2009 to 2018, incidence of open Bankartprocedures declined while Latarjet procedures markedly increased. Future projectionsto 2030 mirrored these findings. These data may provide an enhanced understandingof the evolution of surgical treatment of glenohumeral instability within the U.S. layingthe foundation for continued prospective studies into the appropriate indications andadvancements in surgical techniques. [Table: see text][Table: see text]

Poster 182: Acromial Morphology Influences Instability Risk and Direction: An MRI Study

Objectives: To determine if acromial morphology is associated with posterior or anterior shoulder instability as measured on MRI. Methods: MRI measurements of posterior acromial coverage (PAC), posterior acromial height (PAH), posterior acromial tilt (PAT), and anterior acromial coverage (AAC) were completed for three separate matched groups who underwent surgical intervention: posterior instability, anterior instability, and a comparison group of patients with who underwent arthroscopic surgery for snapping scapula. Inclusion criteria were patients with recurrent instability younger than 40 years of age without multidirectional instability, glenoid bone loss greater than 13.5% or glenoid retroversion greater than 10%. Results: Thirty-seven patients were included in each group. PAC was significantly less in the posterior instability group when compared to anterior and the comparison groups (68.3° vs. 88.7° vs. 81.7°, p&lt;.001). PAH was significantly greater in the posterior group than compared to the anterior instability patients (11.0 mm vs -0.1 mm, p&lt;.001) as well as the comparison patients (0.7 mm, p&lt;.001). There was no difference between the posterior and anterior groups in terms of PAT or AAC (p=0.45, p=0.05). PAT was significantly smaller in the posterior instability group than the comparison group (55.2 degrees vs 62.2 degrees, p=0.026). The anterior and comparison groups were not significantly different in PAH or PAT (p=8.74, p=0.067) but were significantly different with AAC (p=0.26). Conclusions: The posterior acromion is significantly higher and flatter in patients with posterior shoulder instability who require arthroscopic capsulolabral repair when measured on pre-operative MRI. This information may help clinicians to both diagnose and predict the need for operative intervention for patients with posterior labral tears.

Surgical Technique for the Latarjet Procedure Using Non-Cannulated Screws

Background: The Latarjet procedure is effective for patients with anterior glenohumeral instability with substantial glenoid bone loss due to its triple blocking effect. Indications: Indications include high-risk patients with recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability with any glenoid bone loss or low-risk patients with 15% to 30% glenoid bone loss. Technique Description: An incision is made lateral to the coracoid and the deltopectoral interval is established. The pectoralis minor is released medially off the coracoid and the coracoacromial (CA) ligament is released close to the acromion. The coracoid is cut with a right-angle saw and the inferior coracoid is decorticated with a burr. Two holes are pre-drilled in the coracoid. The subscapularis is split between the upper two-thirds and lower one-third with the arm in external rotation. The capsule is split vertically at the joint line and the humeral head is retracted. The anterior glenoid is decorticated with a burr, and a hole is drilled inferiorly. The depth is measured and added to the depth of the inferior bone block hole. A fully threaded 3.5-mm solid stainless steel screw is placed in the inferior hole. Care is taken to ensure that the lateral border of the bone block is flush with the articular margin. This is repeated for the superior hole. A 1.8-mm knotless suture anchor is placed between the screws. The repair stitch is passed through the capsule and loaded onto the anchor and tensioned. The CA ligament is laid over the capsule and repaired. The subscapularis split is repaired side to side and the wound is closed in layers. Results: High return-to-sport rates, including at the same level of play, have been observed among young competitive athletes with significant glenoid bone loss who underwent a Latarjet, with similarly favorable results in older patients. Ninety-day complication rates have been reported around 9%, 5% of which constituted graft or hardware failures. Discussion/Conclusion: The Latarjet procedure is an effective option for indicated patients with anterior glenohumeral instability and may be enhanced with solid screws, proper anatomic technique, and capsulolabral repair augmentation. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Poster 175: ALPSA Lesions Associated with High Rate of Early Repair Failure

Objectives: Anterior labroligamentous periosteal sleeve avulsion (ALPSA) lesions occur in patients with recurrent shoulder instability and are associated with higher rates of failure after capsulolabral repair surgery compared to typical Bankart lesions. Despite recognition that these lesions can portend poor outcomes, there is relatively limited data to understand the associated injuries and postoperative course in a young, active population. The purpose of this study is to evaluate ALPSA lesions for associated pathology and outcomes. Methods: Methods: We reviewed the records of 312 patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder stabilization by one of two fellowship trained sports surgeons at a single facility between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2015. Inclusion criteria were a minimum follow-up of five years after index surgical repair and presence of an ALPSA lesion as identified on arthroscopic exam, leaving 46 patients available for review. Our primary outcome measures were failure and operative revision surgery. We considered failure as any recurrent shoulder instability events including subjective subluxation and dislocation, recurrence of pain consistent with instability, or functionally limiting apprehension. We performed survival analysis and a multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with failure. Results: Results: In total, 46 patients with average age 21.2 years met inclusion and underwent surgery a median of 7.1 months after initial recalled injury event. 11/46 had concomitant posterior pathology in addition to anterior labral lesion. Six patients were found to have SLAP lesions. All patients experienced subjective instability, and 44/46 endorsed pain prior to surgery. 38/46 reported having experienced complete dislocation. The median number of dislocations before surgery was 3. Repairs were performed with average 3.7 anchors. Eight patients failed surgery at median 15.1 months post-index procedure, with 75% of failures occurring before two years with the remaining 25% occurring later in follow-up. Three of these failed revision repair. Conclusions: Conclusions: ALPSA lesions frequently occur in the presence of other intra-articular shoulder lesions and portend a high rate of recurrent shoulder instability despite repair. Notably, while failure occurs at a high rate, most repair failure for these lesions tends to occur early.

Criterion-Based Rehabilitation and Return to Play in Fast Bowlers Following Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: Recommendations Based on a DetailedClinical Review.

Anterior shoulder instability due to labral tears in the dominant arm of cricket fast bowlers can be particularly disabling and results in significant match time loss. This often follows injuries sustained during fielding and training, although micro-instability following repetitive throwing progressing to overt anterior shoulder instability is also known. To ensure ball release speeds of over 140km/h with different ball variations, these athletes require not only physical fitness and technical skill, but also a completely stable shoulder. A literature search of "MEDLINE", "SPORT DISCUSS", and "GOOGLE SCHOLAR" was done to identify relevant articles published till the year 2023. A treatment approach that involves anatomic restoration of the shoulder via an arthroscopic Bankart capsulo-labral repair, followed by functional and biomechanical restoration via rehabilitation is the most predictable method to ensure a successful return to pre-injury fast-bowling status. A post-operative rehabilitation program that ensures a quick return to fast bowling without disrupting the surgical repair is crucial. Timely integration of exercises to recruit and strengthen the kinetic chain used for bowling and throwing plays a key role in this faster recovery. This current review provides a phase-wise, evidence-based rehabilitation guideline for return to competitive cricket after arthroscopic Bankart repair in a fast bowler. This review also highlights a structured return to bowling, throwing, and fielding program with a clinical decision-making process. Exercise selection at an early stage that does not compromise the healing tissue, and timely integration of workouts to recruit and strengthen the kinetic chain used for bowling and throwing is the key strategy to allow faster recovery. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-023-00931-5.

The influence of posterior acromial morphology on outcomes and return to pushups in young patients undergoing arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair

Prior evidence has identified specific posterior acromial morphology as significantly associated with unidirectional posterior shoulder instability. The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of posterior acromial morphology on the outcomes of arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair (APCLR) for unidirectional posterior shoulder instability. Additionally, we sought to determine the influence of posterior acromial morphology on the rate and time to return to pushups following APCLR. We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. The study included consecutive patients undergoing APCLR. Data collected included demographics, radiographic measurements including posterior acromial height (PAH) and posterior acromial tilt on preoperative scapular-Y radiographs, and patient-reported outcome measures at the preoperative and postoperative visits. In addition, starting at 6 months postoperative, patients were asked if they could perform pushups defined as at least 10 repetitions. At the final follow-up, we collected the number of pushups patients were able to perform. Thirty-two consecutive patients underwent APCLR with a mean follow-up of 26 months (range, 12-41). Significant improvement from preoperative to 2 years postoperative was demonstrated in Subjective Shoulder Value (50-85), VAS (6-2.5), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (48 to 83), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) (1437-777), P=.001. The recurrent instability rate was 3/32 (9%). Patients with PAH>23 (N=17) had a recurrent instability rate of 18% (3/17) versus PAH ≤ 23 (N=15) 0% (0/15), worse WOSI scores (P=.41), and a lower number of pushups (P=.48). The percentage of patients reporting the ability to perform pushups was (6 months/1 year/2 years) (50%/78%/95%). The mean number of pushups reported at the final follow-up was 33 (range, 1-60). Following APCLR, approximately 50% of patients resume pushups at 6 months postoperatively, and 80% return at 1 year. Patients reported performing a mean of 33 pushups following APCLR at the final follow-up. Patients with a PAH greater than 23 on preoperative scapular-Y radiographs had a higher rate of recurrent posterior instability, worse WOSI scores, and lower return to pushups; however, the results did not meet statistical significance. Therefore, future larger studies are needed to determine if posterior acromial morphology is independently associated with worse outcomes and increased recurrent instability rates following APCLR.