Capsular Shift Research Articles

Similar outcomes in collision athletes with subcritical glenoid bone loss and on-Track Hill Sachs lesion versus off-track Hill Sachs lesion managed with open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift.

Open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift has not yet been tested under the concept of glenoid track as a predictor of failure. The aim of this study was to compare the subjective and objective outcomes in collision athletes with subcritical glenoid bone loss and on-track Hill Sachs lesions versus those with off-track Hill Sachs lesions, all treated with open Bankart repair. Two study groups were created: 50 patients had on-track Hill Sachs lesions, while 38 had off-track lesions. The subcritical glenoid bone loss was ≤ 10%. A minimum follow-up period of 3 years was established. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation of each group and between them was performed. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scale were used to assess subjective outcomes. Recurrence rate, range of motion and return to sport were evaluated as objective outcomes. Significant differences were reported in the WOSI and ASES scores between preoperative and postoperative values in each group. There were no significant differences between the two groups (p-value = 0.36 and 0.71). Three dislocations (6%) in the on-track group and 3 (7.8%) in the off-track group were recorded, showing no differences between the two groups (p-value = 0.83). There were no differences in ROM between pre- and post-operatively in each group or when comparing the two groups. We found no differences between the outcomes of the two groups. According to the surgeon's preference, we recommend performing open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift as a treatment alternative in collision athletes with SGBL ≤ 10% independently of the type of Hill Sachs lesion.

Open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift versus isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair in collision athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability: a prospective study

BackgroundOpen Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift and isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair have never been prospectively compared under the concept of glenoid track in collision athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes, range of motion and recurrence rate between these two surgical techniques. We hypothesized that open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift would provide similar functional outcomes to isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair but with a lower recurrence rate. MethodsA prospective cohort study was conducted with 86 collision athletes divided into two groups of 43 patients each. All patients had a subcritical glenoid bone loss ≤ 13.5% and an on-track Hill Sachs lesion. The average follow-up was 66 (60-93) months for the open group and 68 (60-97) months for the arthroscopic group. The primary functional outcomes of each group were evaluated at baseline, 6 months, 1 year and for a minimum of 5 years after surgery. The functional outcomes were also compared between the two groups. The assessment tools included the WOSI and ASES scores. In addition, recurrent instability and range of motion were also evaluated. ResultsIn each group, there were significant differences in WOSI and ASES scores between the pre and postoperative periods. There were no differences between the groups at the end of follow-up (P = 0.47 and 0.22). Three dislocations (6.9%) in the open group and 10 dislocations (23.2%) in the arthroscopic group were reported showing significant differences (P = .012). In addition, there were no differences in range of motion between pre and postoperative periods for each group as well as between them. ConclusionWe found no differences in functional outcomes and range of motion between the two groups. The recurrence rate was significantly higher in the arthroscopic group. We recommend performing open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift as a treatment alternative in collision athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability.

The History and Evolution of the Open Labral Repair with Capsular Shift for Shoulder Instability.

The purpose of this review is to describe the evolution of the open labral repair with capsular shift, including the current role of this procedure in the treatment of shoulder instability. Currently, a subset of patients - high-level collision/contact sport athletes, patients with significant inferior or multi-directional instability, and individuals with failed arthroscopic Bankart repair without bone loss - may experience benefit from undergoing open Bankart repair with capsular shift. Surgeons performing open stabilization can benefit from instrumentation and anchors developed to assist with arthroscopic techniques. Understanding the history and evolution behind the procedure not only allows the surgeon to appreciate principles behind an arthroscopic approach, but also permits the utilization of an open approach when required by patient pathology and risk factors.

Revision Anterior Glenoid Reconstruction With Distal Tibia Allograft Combined With Open Capsular Shift

Background: Managing patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and glenoid bony deficiency remains a challenge. Multiple graft options, including iliac crest, distal clavicle, coracoid, and distal tibia allograft have been used. There is a growing body of evidence that supports distal tibia allograft for glenoid restoration in patients with shoulder instability due to its ability to restore the articular surface as well as the glenoid depth and curvature. Indications: Surgical indications for anterior glenoid reconstruction with distal tibia allograft combined with open capsular shift include patients with recurrent shoulder instability and glenoid bone loss. Technique Description: A deltopectoral interval is utilized and the subscapularis is split in lines with its fibers. The subscapularis and capsule are split together in a horizontal fashion and tagged together. Any prior hardware is then removed utilizing appropriate removal sets, a burr, and a broken screw set if necessary. The anterior glenoid is then prepared and the defect is measured. Bone marrow aspirate is then harvested from the proximal humerus using a vortex needle. The distal tibia allograft is then cut to size and prepared utilizing pulsed lavage, pressurized sterile carbon dioxide, and the bone marrow aspirate. The allograft is then fixed with solid stainless steel 3.5-mm cortical screws with washers. The medial, glenoid based capsular repair it completed by placing 1.8-mm knotless FiberTak anchor at the bottom of the distal tibia allograft. A free needle is utilized to place a horizontal mattress stitch from the anchor to the inferior capsule, which is then loaded onto a shuttling suture, to repair it to the anterior inferior glenoid. A knotless anchor is then placed right off the chondral margin of the humeral head, and this is used to repair both the capsule and subscapularis in the correct position by passing through both inferior and superior leaflets. This is then loaded onto the knotless anchor and reduced, which shifts the subscapularis and capsule laterally. The remainder of the subscapularis split is then closed. Patients are then placed in a sling with an abduction pillow with no shoulder range of motion for 6 weeks. They can then progress their therapy with a goal of returning to sport at 6 months. Results: Several large systemic reviews have shown that return to sport rates after anterior glenoid reconstruction range between 80% and 90%, with returning to the same level of play in the 70% range. Discussion: Anterior glenoid reconstruction utilizing distal tibia allograft combined with an open capsular shift is a durable surgical option for patients presenting with shoulder instability and glenoid bone loss. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Open Bankart Repair with Subscapularis Split.

Anterior shoulder dislocations are a common injury, especially in the young, active, male population1. Soft-tissue treatment options for shoulder instability include arthroscopic or open Bankart repair, with open Bankart repair historically having lower rates of recurrence and reoperation, faster return to activity2-4, and a similar quality of life compared with arthroscopic repair5. More recent literature has suggested similar recurrence rates between arthroscopic and open procedures6. However, open Bankart repair may be indicated in cases of recurrent instability, especially if the patient participates in high-risk sports, because open repair can provide more capsular shift through the use of extra-capsular knots7. Performing a subscapularis split decreases the likelihood of subscapularis tendon avulsion following subscapularis tendon tenotomy and subsequent repair, as has been described in the literature8. Indications for open Bankart repair include failure of arthroscopic Bankart repair, multiple dislocations, with subcritical bone loss. This surgical technique is performed via the deltopectoral approach. The subscapularis tendon is exposed and "spared" by splitting the fibers with use of a longitudinal incision between the upper 2/3 and lower 1/3 of the subscapularis. We begin the split medially near the myotendinous junction. Because the subscapularis becomes increasingly difficult to separate from the capsule as it tracks laterally, a RAY-TEC sponge is utilized to bluntly dissect. A T-shaped laterally based capsulotomy is made to expose the glenohumeral joint. The vertical aspect is made first, followed by the horizontal aspect from lateral to medial, extending to the labrum. A Fukuda retractor is placed through the split to hold the humeral head laterally. The labrum is elevated, and the glenoid is prepared with rasp. Then labrum is repaired with knotted suture anchors until it is secure. One anchor is utilized for each "hour" of the clock face, with a minimum of 3 anchors. The anchors are placed on the articular margin of the glenoid. Sutures are passed from the anchor through the capsule and tied outside the capsule. The capsulotomy is then repaired with use of a suture. The suture is utilized to pull the inferior portion superiorly. The inferior portion is taken superiorly, and the superior leaflet is imbricated over the top. Finally, an examination is performed to ensure that the humeral head can be translated to but not over the anterior and posterior glenoid rims. No repair of the subscapularis tendon insertion is required. The incision is closed with deep dermal and subcuticular suture. Nonoperative treatment options include rotator cuff and periscapular strengthening or immobilization. Operative treatment options include open Bankart repair with subscapularis tenotomy and repair, arthroscopic Bankart repair, or bone block augmentation procedures. This procedure is different from the alternative treatments in that it is an open procedure, which allows for a more robust repair because the capsule can be shifted and doubled over, leading to the described decreased recurrence and reoperation rates. Open Bankart repair is better suited for large lesions that would be difficult to repair via arthroscopy. This procedure differs from other open Bankart techniques because the subscapularis is split rather than tenotomized, which removes the need to repair the tendon and decreases the rate of avulsion of the subscapularis tendon repair. Finally, this procedure is less invasive than the Latarjet procedure because it does not require osseous osteotomies and fixation. This procedure provides adequate capsular shift and visualization of the Bankart lesion without the increased risk of postoperative subscapularis tendon injury. If the subscapularis split alone does not provide adequate visualization, portions of the subscapularis tendon can be released from the lesser tuberosity.The location and origin of the upper and lower subscapular nerves can have variable courses, which could theoretically put them at risk for iatrogenic injury; however, studies have shown this subscapularis split technique to be safe from and prevent denervation of the muscle. GBL = glenoid bone lossEUA = examination under anesthesiaMRI = magnetic resonance imagingHSL = Hill-Sachs lesionAHCA = anterior humeral circumflex artery.

Shoulder & Elbow

The February 2024 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup360 looks at: Does indomethacin prevent heterotopic ossification following elbow fracture fixation?; Arthroscopic capsular shift in atraumatic shoulder joint instability; Ultrasound-guided lavage with corticosteroid injection versus sham; Combined surgical and exercise-based interventions following primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis; Are vascularized fibula autografts a long-lasting reconstruction after intercalary resection of the humerus for primary bone tumours?; Anatomical versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with limited forward elevation; Tension band or plate fixation for simple displaced olecranon fractures?; Is long-term follow-up and monitoring in shoulder and elbow arthroplasty needed?

Arthroscopic capsular shift from inferior to superior has an exceptional safety profile and short-term outcomes

ObjectivesArthroscopic Bankart for anterior shoulder instability has a good safety profile but with a relatively high recurrence index. Open surgery has been used to decrease recurrence rates but with a higher complication rate. Arthroscopic capsular shift from inferior to superior (ACSIS) was designed to decrease the recurrence rates without the added morbidity of open surgery. MethodsAn observational retrospective study was conducted to analyze perioperative complications and patient reported outcomes of patients treated with ACSIS to determine the safety profile of the procedure. The patients with anterior traumatic shoulder instability treated with ACSIS between January 2015 and December 2021 were included for the study. The analysis was conducted using SPSS (Version 27). The pre vs. postoperative Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index scores were compared using a paired sample t-test or Wilcoxon signed ranks test depending on the results of the normality test and Levene's test. The significance level was 0.05 in all analyses. Thirty-six patients were included in this study, the mean age of the population is 30.8 ​± ​11.4 years, with a male dominance of 86.1% (N ​= ​31), and a mean clinical follow-up of 2.7 ​± ​1.2 years. ResultsNo intraoperative complications, including bleeding or neurovascular injury, were noted. Additionally, no early postoperative complications, including infection or hospital readmission, were noted. During the follow-up, one patient (3%) had persistent apprehension. The mean Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index decreased from 66.6 ​± ​13.10% to 27.9 ​± ​22% postoperatively (P ​< ​0.001). ConclusionsACSIS procedure is safe and has good short-term outcomes with a low recurrence rate at 1-year minimum follow-up. Level of Evidence3 (Observational study).

Arthroscopic Labral Reconstruction With a Modified Inferior Capsular Shift Allows Return to Sport and Excellent Outcomes in Contact and Noncontact Athletes With Anterior Shoulder Instability at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up

PurposeTo compare return to sport, functional outcomes, recurrence of instability, and osteoarthritis(OA) between collision/contact and limited/non-contact athletes following arthroscopic labral reconstruction with a modified inferior capsular shift for anterior shoulder instability. MethodsAthletes underwent an arthroscopic labral reconstruction with a modified inferior capsular shift, by the senior author between 1999 and 2017. Inclusion criteria were labral stripping from 12(just beyond the biceps anchor) to 6 o’clock, less than 20% glenoid bone loss, active sports participation, and no prior surgery. Athletes were divided into collision/contact and limited/non-contact groups. Outcome measures, physical examination, and radiographic evaluation were collected at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Re-operations or any subjective laxity were considered failures. Radiographs were analyzed for OA utilizing Samilson-Prieto Radiological Classification. ResultsNinety-two patients underwent arthroscopic labral reconstruction with a modified inferior capsular shift. Sixty-four met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-eight(age=26.0±8.0 years) participated in at least one collision/contact sport, and 26(age=38.0±9.0 years) participated in limited/non-contact sports. Two(5%) collision/contact and 3(12%) limited/non-contact athletes had traumatic re-injury requiring revision surgery. Of the remaining athletes (59/64), minimum 5-year follow-up was obtained on 54(92%) with a mean follow-up of 12±4 years(range 5 to 23 years). All athletes returned to their original sport at the same level. There was no significant difference between collision/contact and limited/non-contact athletes in timing of return to sports (5.2±1.9 and 6.0±3.1 months, respectively; p=0.389). There were no significant differences between groups on any outcomes scores. ConclusionArthroscopic labral reconstruction with a modified inferior capsular shift addressed anterior instability with return to sport for both collision/contact and limited/non-contact athletes with excellent functional and clinical outcomes, full shoulder ROM, and a low prevalence of advanced OA at minimum 5-year follow-up. This modified technique resulted in a low failure rate in both limited/non-contact and collision/contact athletes.

Trends and projections in surgical stabilization of glenohumeral instability in the United States from 2009 to 2030: rise of the Latarjet procedure and fall of open Bankart repair.

Advances in surgical techniques have improved the ability to address recurrent glenohumeral instability via arthroscopic capsulolabral repair and bone-restoring procedures such as the Latarjet procedure. Given the paucity of studies analyzing temporal trends in the surgical management of glenohumeral instability, the purpose of this study was to assess trends in the treatment of anterior, posterior, and multidirectional instability over a 10-year period and model projections to 2030. Using the IBM Watson MarketScan national database, we identified all patients who underwent glenohumeral instability procedures from 2009 to 2018. Procedures were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes for open Bankart, Latarjet, anterior bone block, posterior bone block, multidirectional capsular shift, and arthroscopic Bankart procedures. Sample weights provided by the database were used to calculate national estimates. US Census Bureau annual population data were used to calculate incidence. Future projections to 2030 were modeled using Poisson and linear regression. There were an estimated 446,072 glenohumeral instability cases from 2009 to 2018. The per capita incidence (per 100,000) remained constant, from 14.8 in 2009 to 14.5 in 2018. Arthroscopic Bankart procedures comprised the highest number of procedures throughout the study period, accounting for 89% of all procedures in 2009 and 93% in 2018. The number of open Bankart procedures decreased by 65% from 2009 to 2018, whereas the number of Latarjet procedures showed a 250% increase over the same period. Patient demographics did not change over the study period, and male patients aged 18-25 years comprised the largest demographic group undergoing anterior instability procedures. Multidirectional instability procedures exhibited the least pronounced sex differences. Future modeling from 2018 to 2030 projected a continued steady rise in arthroscopic Bankart procedures (from 40,000 to 49,000 cases/yr), rapid growth in Latarjet procedures (from 1370 to 4300 cases/yr), and continued decline in open Bankart procedures (from 1000 to 250 cases/yr). Arthroscopic Bankart repair continues to be the most common glenohumeral instability procedure in the United States. From 2009 to 2018, the incidence of open Bankart procedures declined whereas the incidence of Latarjet procedures markedly increased. Future projections to 2030 mirrored these findings. These data may provide an enhanced understanding of the evolution of surgical treatment of glenohumeral instability within the United States, laying the foundation for continued prospective studies into the appropriate indications and advancements in surgical techniques.

Poster 185: Arthroscopic Inferior to Superior Capsular Shift Results in Superior Clinical Outcomes Compared to Arthroscopic Bankart Repair For the Treatment of Anterior Capsulolabral Tears After Shoulder Dislocation

Objectives: In the setting of anterior shoulder instability, both boney and soft tissue structures are at risk of injury. Often, there is an injury to the anterior capsulolabral complex. This pathology is most often treated with a traditional arthroscopic Bankart repair. The open Bankart is regaining popularity as some surgeons report a lower re-dislocation rate as compared to its arthroscopic counterpart. Some believe that a better capsular shift is achieved with open surgery. We recently developed a technique for performing this capsular shift arthroscopically. The purpose of this study is to analyze and compare clinical outcomes of patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability treated with two different arthroscopic techniques, arthroscopic capsular shift and arthroscopic Bankart repair (Figure 1). The primary objective of this study is to analyze and compare clinical outcomes, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) scores, complication, and re-dislocation rates. We hypothesize that patients treated with arthroscopic capsular shift will have similar clinical outcomes and a lower failure rate at one year compared with the other surgical cohort. Methods: This study included patients who underwent arthroscopic soft-tissue stabilization surgery for shoulder instability between 2012-2021. Patients were included if they had an isolated primary soft- tissue repair performed arthroscopically with one of the above-mentioned surgical techniques. Patients were excluded if they had concomitant glenoid fractures, less than one year of clinical follow-up, posterior instability, multidirectional instability, and presence of HAGL lesions Demographic information, WOSI scores, pre-operative glenoid and humeral head dimensions, and new dislocation events were recorded. Results: Sixty-three patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. There were 27 patients in the Bankart repair group and 36 in the capsular shift group. The two groups had similar demographics and baseline characteristics, except for the length of clinical follow-up (which is due to the capsular shift technique being developed more recently) (p&lt;0.001) (Table 1). Both groups had similar pre-operative glenoid AP and Hill-Sachs depth measurements (p=0.358 and 0.329, respectively) (Table 1). Patient- reported outcomes were similar at baseline (p=0.602) and post-operatively (p=0.621). Both groups showed improvements in WOSI post-operatively (p&lt;0.001), however more patients met MCID in the capsular shift group as compared to the Bankart repair group (93% vs 75%, respectively). In terms of clinical outcomes, patients who received a capsular shift had a lower rate of re-dislocation as compared to the Bankart group (6% vs 22%). Conclusions: The arthroscopic capsular shift technique results in better post-operative clinical outcomes as compared to arthroscopic Bankart repair with a lower recurrence rate, lower rate of post-operative apprehension, and an increased proportion of patients who meet MCID for WOSI. This technique could be a better alternative for Bankart repair in patients with soft-tissue pathologies following anterior shoulder dislocations, however longer-term studies are necessary to determine the longevity of these outcomes. [Table: see text]

Poster 201: Trends and Projections in Surgical Stabilization of Glenohumeral Instability in the United States from 2009 to 2030: Rise of the Latarjet and Fall of the Open Bankart

Objectives: Advances in surgical techniques have improved the ability to addressrecurrent glenohumeral instability via arthroscopic capsulolabral repair and bonerestoring procedures such as Latarjet. Given the paucity of studies analyzing temporaltrends in surgical management of glenohumeral instability, the purpose of this studywas to assess trends in treatment of anterior, posterior, and multidirectional instabilityover a 10-year period and model projections to 2030. Methods: Using IBM Watson Marketscan national database, all patients thatunderwent glenohumeral instability procedures from 2009 to 2018 were identified.Procedures were identified using common procedural terminology (CPT) codes foropen Bankart Repair, Latarjet, anterior bone block, posterior bone block,multidirectional capsular shift, and arthroscopic Bankart procedures. Sample weightsprovided by the database were utilized to calculate national estimates. The UnitedStates (U.S.) Census Bureau annual population data were utilized for calculatingincidence. Future projections to 2030 were modeled using Poisson and linearregression. Results: There were an estimated 446,072 glenohumeral instability cases from 2009-2018. Per capita (per 100,000) incidence remained constant, from 14.8 in 2009 to 14.5in 2018. Arthroscopic Bankart comprised the highest number of procedures throughoutthe study period, accounting for 89% of all procedures in 2009 and 93% in 2018. OpenBankart procedures decreased by 65% from 2009 to 2018, while there was a 250%increase in Latarjet procedures over the same period. Patient demographics did notchange over the study period, and males aged 18-25 comprised the largestdemographic group undergoing anterior instability procedures. Multidirectionalinstability procedures exhibited the least pronounced gender differences. Futuremodeling from 2018-2030 projected continued steady rise in arthroscopic Bankart(40,000-49,000 case/yr), rapid growth in Latarjet (1370-4300 cases/yr), and continueddecline in open Bankart (1000-250 cases/yr) procedures. Conclusions: Arthroscopic Bankart continues to be the most common glenohumeralinstability procedure in the U.S. From 2009 to 2018, incidence of open Bankartprocedures declined while Latarjet procedures markedly increased. Future projectionsto 2030 mirrored these findings. These data may provide an enhanced understandingof the evolution of surgical treatment of glenohumeral instability within the U.S. layingthe foundation for continued prospective studies into the appropriate indications andadvancements in surgical techniques. [Table: see text][Table: see text]

Poster 189: The Latarjet Procedure: 6-Year Outcomes in Female Patients

Objectives: Despite nearly 30% of first-time anterior shoulder dislocations occurring in females, little has been reported on the outcomes of female patients with recurrent instability and bone loss. Stabilization surgery via the Latarjet procedure can reduce the risk of recurrent dislocation and improve patient quality of life. Prior studies have focused on high-risk subgroups, such as young males who play contact sports, and there thus remains a paucity of data regarding female-specific outcomes. The limited data on shoulder stabilization surgery in female patients has demonstrated low post-operative return to sport and shoulder scores, suggesting that current strategies are not adequately meeting the demands of this demographic. The objective of this study was to investigate and retrospectively report on the outcomes of female patients undergoing the Latarjet procedure. Methods: A query of the administrative database at a single surgical center based on the CPT code 23462 was used to identify all patients from January 2010 to October 2021 who underwent the Latarjet procedure. All female patients undergoing the Latarjet procedure with minimum 24-month follow-up were considered for inclusion in the study. We retrospectively reviewed clinical and operative notes of all eligible patients. Patients were contacted via telephone or email and interviewed to obtain Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Return to Sport (RTS) data. Results: After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 30 patients were eligible for participation in the study. Of these, one (3.3%) declined to participate and 10 (33.3%) were unable to be contacted, leaving 19 (63.3%) patients available for analysis. The median age at the time of surgery was 29.0 years (IQR, 23.5-41.0), median BMI 24.5 kg/m2 (IQR, 21.8-30.6), and average follow up 76.5 months (range, 24.6-144.3). Eleven patients (57.9%) had undergone prior arthroscopic soft-tissue stabilization. Concomitant procedures occurred in 10 (52.6%) patients including open capsular shift in seven (36.8%), arthroscopic plication in three (15.8%), and arthroscopic debridement in three (15.8%). All surgical procedures were performed using an open approach. The subscapularis was managed with tenotomy in 6 patients (31.6%) and a split in 12 (63.2%). The approach was not detailed in one patient (5.3%) (Table 1). Median post-operative NPRS and SANE scores were 1 (IQR, 0-4) and 70 (IQR, 63-85), respectively. Patient reported sporting activities included: cheerleading (1), softball (2), yoga (1), track and field (2), and soccer (1) (Table 2). Twelve patients (63.2%) denied involvement in athletic activity prior to surgery. Of the seven patients who reported playing a sport in the three years prior to surgery, 3 (42.9%) had a successful RTS at a median of 12.0 months (range, 8.0-36.0). Among these three patients, the level of play upon return was variable (1 worse, 1 same, 1 better). In the four patients who did not RTS, two (50%) cited a shoulder specific reason (Table 3). Four patients (21.1%) required reoperation at a median of 15.3 months (IQR, 11.3-43.0) (Table 4). The indication for all reoperations included persistent pain and lack of range of motion. One patient (5.3%) went on to require reverse total shoulder arthroplasty due to persistent pain and poor function, and one (5.3%) required total shoulder arthroplasty due to recurrent instability after involvement in a motor vehicle accident. Conclusions: At mid-term follow-up female patients reported acceptable pain levels despite overall low shoulder function and RTS in comparison to published data. The role of patient sex should be explored further as a variable to be taken into consideration when determining appropriate treatment options for shoulder instability. [Table: see text][Table: see text][Table: see text][Table: see text]

Arthroscopic capsular shift surgery in patients with atraumatic shoulder joint instability: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial

ObjectivesTo determine the effect of arthroscopic capsular shift surgery on pain and functional impairment for people with atraumatic shoulder (glenohumeral) joint instability.MethodsWe conducted a randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial in a...

Long-Term Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Labral Reconstruction with a Modified Inferior Capsular Shift for Anterior Shoulder Instability

Long-Term Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Labral Reconstruction with a Modified Inferior Capsular Shift for Anterior Shoulder Instability

Comprehensive Review of Multidirectional Instability of the Shoulder.

Multidirectional instability of the shoulder can result from underlying atraumatic laxity, from repetitive microtrauma, or from a traumatic injury and often occurs in association with generalized ligamentous laxity or underlying connective tissue disorders. It is critical to differentiate multidirectional instability from unidirectional instability with or without generalized laxity to maximize treatment success. Although rehabilitation is still considered the primary treatment method for this condition, surgical treatment in the form of open inferior capsular shift or arthroscopic pancapsulolabral plication is indicated if conservative treatment fails. Recent biomechanical and clinical research has shown that there is still room for improvement in the treatment methods offered to this specific patient cohort. Potential treatment options, such as various methods to improve cross-linking of native collagen tissue, electric muscle stimulation to retrain the abnormally functioning dynamic stabilizers of the shoulder, and alternative surgical techniques such as coracohumeral ligament reconstruction and bone-based augmentation procedures, are brought forth in this article as potential avenues to explore in the future.

Anterior Bankart Repair With Superior Capsular Plication Causes Increased Mean Tension in Posterior Glenohumeral Capsule

The purpose of this study is to investigate if a biomechanical difference exists in the prerepair and postrepair states of the posterior inferior glenohumeral ligament (PIGHL) following anterior Bankart repair with respect to capsular tension, labral height, and capsular shift. In this study, 12 cadaveric shoulders were dissected to the glenohumeral capsule and disarticulated. The specimens were loaded to 5-mm displacement using a custom shoulder simulator, and measurements were taken for posterior capsular tension, labral height, and capsular shift. We measured the capsular tension, labral height, and capsular shift of the PIGHL in its native state and following repair of a simulated anterior Bankart lesion. We found that there was a significant increase in the mean capsular tension of the posterior inferior glenohumeral ligament (Δ= 2.12 ± 2.10 N; P= .005), as well as posterior capsular shift (Δ= .362 ± 0.365 mm; P= .018). There was no significant change in posterior labral height (Δ= 0.297 ± 0.667 mm; P= .193). These results demonstrate the sling effect of the inferior glenohumeral ligament. Although the posterior inferior glenohumeral ligament is not directly manipulated during an anterior Bankart repair, when the anterior inferior glenohumeral ligament is plicated superiorly, some of the tension is transmitted to the posterior glenohumeral ligament as a result of the sling effect. Anterior Bankart repair with superior capsular plication results in an increased mean tension of the PIGHL. Clinically, this may contribute to shoulder stability.

Multidirectional Instability of Shoulder Joint: A Review

Introduction: The biomechanics of the shoulder joint are complex. To allow a functional range of motion, stability is sacrificed. Glenohumeral joint stability is maintained by static and dynamic stabilizers. Static stabilizers are non-contractile structures including capsulolabral structures and bony glenoid while dynamic stabilizers are contractile structures including rotator cuff, conjoint tendon, and long head of the bicep. The objective of this review is to elaborate on multidirectional instability (MDI) of the shoulder joint and the management of this disorder. Review: Laxity can be affected by hereditary and genetic factors. This can be seen for example in generalized joint laxity which often manifests in the shoulder as MDI. Mutations in collagen genes can cause altered collagen structure, mostly in collagen Type I, resulting in smaller and longer collagen cells. Abnormalities could be found in mRNA synthesis or amino acid transcription for collagen protein, resulting in amino acid content variation. Alterations in fine-tuning mechanism, cleavage process, ionic interaction, cross-linking and metabolism could also result in collagen quality variation. Genetic factors could also cause elastin overproduction rate or amount. Elastin amino acid content alterations could also be affected genetically. These alterations produced a looser static stabilizer. Even so, shoulder joint have multiple static stabilizers and the individual having hereditary laxity does not always have problems related to joint laxity. If the laxity caused problems, it is usually in the form of pain, discomfort, or disruption in shoulder joint function. To compensate for the loose static stabilizer, rehabilitation should be optimized on the contractile, musculature structure of the glenohumeral joint. Besides rehabilitation, capsular shift procedure could also be performed as management of the affected joint by open surgery, arthroscopic capsular plication, or arthroscopic thermal capsulorrhaphy. Conclusion: Based on the review conducted, reoperation rates for open surgery, arthroscopic technique, and thermal technique were approximately 10%, 5%, and 15% subsequently. This should be considered when choosing the appropriate surgery method for MDI management if rehabilitation on contractile structures does not improve patients’ condition.

Outcomes of Open Bankart Repair Plus Inferior Capsular Shift Compared with Latarjet Procedure in Contact Athletes with Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability.

Open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift (OBICS) and Latarjet procedure (LA) are considered appropriate treatment alternatives for high-performance athletes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes and recurrence rate of each surgery. Our hypothesis: there were no differences between the two treatments. A prospective cohort study was conducted with n=90 contact athletes divided into two groups of 45 patients. One group was treated with OBICS, and the other one with LA. The mean follow-up period was 25 (24-32) months for the OBICS group and 26 (24-31) months for the LA group. Primary functional outcomes of each group were assessed at baseline, six months, one year, and two years after surgery. The functional outcomes were also compared between the groups. The evaluation tools used were the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability score (WOSI) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scale (ASES). In addition, recurrent instability and range of motion (ROM) were also evaluated. In each group, significant changes were found in the WOSI score and ASES scale from pre-op to postop. However, there were no significant differences between the functional outcomes of the groups at the final follow-up (P-values 0.73 and 0.19). Three dislocations and one subluxation (8.8%) were reported in the OBICS group, and three subluxations were reported in the LA group (6.6%), revealing no significant differences between the groups (P=0.37). Moreover, there were no significant differences between preoperative and postoperative ROM in each group or in terms of external rotation (ER) and ER in 90º abduction between the groups. No differences were found between OBICS and LA surgery. Both procedures can be indicated according to the surgeon's preference to reduce recurrence rates in contact athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability.

The "purse string" technique for anterior glenohumeral instability: long-term results 7-13-year follow-up.

The "Purse-String Technique" (PST) is an arthroscopic horizontal mattress suture technique for recurrent anterior shoulder instability that uses a single double-loaded suture anchor at the 4-o' clock position, achieving a Bankart labral repair and an infero-superior capsular shift. In this study, we describe the long-term results of the PST. The study included 69 individuals (70 shoulders), with a mean age of 30years, who had recurrent post-traumatic anteroinferior instability. Apurse-stringsuture anchor at the 4-o'clock position was used to address the Bankart lesion and capsular laxity, recreating the anterior glenoid bumper. All patients were assessed via telephone interview at a mean of 116months after surgery (7-13-year follow-up). Postoperatively, the mean Constant score was 94, mean Rowe score was 93 and mean Walch-Duplay score was 89. 89% of patients resumed their preinjury sport activities, with 61% of patients achieving preinjury levels and most professional athletes returning to full activity. Seven patients had recurrent dislocation postoperatively (10% failure rate). Of these patients, three had revision arthroscopic stabilization, one patient had revision arthroscopic stabilization with remplissage, two had a Latarjet procedure, whereas one patient decided to seek no further treatment. The long-term results of PST are promising, with a low failure rate, high patient satisfaction and a high rate of return to sport. Level IV; Case series; Treatment study.

Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction Using Double Femoral Fixation With Adjustable Loop Cortical Suspension and Interference Screw

Background: The posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee is a complex anatomic region of the knee comprising the popliteus tendon, the popliteofibular ligament (PFL), and the fibular collateral ligament (FCL). Treatment of PLC injuries is based on the degree of varus and rotational instability on preoperative examination and is recommended in grade 3 injuries.1,6 Technique Description: The key concept of this new surgical technique is to use adjustable loop cortical suspensory fixation implants for initial femoral fixation of the popliteus and the FCL grafts. This allows for individual tensioning of the grafts prior to definitive fixation with an interference screw. An anatomic fibular tunnel is initially created, followed by popliteus and FCL anatomic femoral socket drilling. A TightRope RT implant is attached to the popliteus end of the graft and secured through a bone tunnel on the medial femoral cortex initially. The popliteus end of the graft is then pulled into the femoral socket before tunneling the graft through the fibular tunnel. A second TightRope RT implant is secured to the FCL end of the graft before securing it to the medial femoral cortex through a bone tunnel and pulling the graft into the drilled femoral socket. An interference screw is first used to secure the graft at the fibular tunnel. The knee is then taken to 60° where the TightRope device is used to remove residual creep and optimize final tensioning prior to final fixation with interference screw in femoral socket. With the knee at 30° of flexion, neutral rotation, and slight valgus, the same steps are repeated for FCL graft. A posterolateral capsular shift is completed for additional stability. Results: Residual posterolateral corner instability or failure after reconstruction surgery has been reported in 6% to 9.4% of surgical reconstruction case.2,3,5 The use of cortical suspensory devices in PLC reconstructions allows independent dialing of optimal graft tension for both the popliteus and FCL reconstruction before final interference screw fixation, therefore presumably limiting any residual creep and allowing for a double femoral fixation of the graft. Discussion: We describe a novel technique for posterolateral corner reconstruction which allows for optimal and individual tensioning of the structures of the posterolateral corner. Given the technique still uses well-described and validated graft choices and anatomic landmarks for reconstruction, we expect this new technique to allow for similar if not improved outcomes when compared with current gold standard.4