This theoretical essay aims to reflect on the concept of capitalist realism, by the author Mark Fisher, and its correlation with the context of work in Amazonian tourism, especially that carried out in conservation units (CU) by traditional communities. Fisher defines capitalist realism as a widespread belief in a defeatist way, which supports the idea that capitalism is the only viable economic and political system, with no alternatives even in the face of widespread dissatisfaction. In the context of Amazonian tourism, the proposal for community tourism (TC) stands out as an alternative to the mainstream, focusing on local development centered on the communities' endogenous resources. However, the essay argues that TC analysis often neglects working conditions and industrial relations. The question arises as to how it is possible to propose a sustainable alternative without considering workers and their interactions with natural resources. On a methodological level, this study is a theoretical essay, anchored in a bibliographical review with a critical perspective and qualitative nature. As a preliminary result, it points to the danger in hybrid forms of work organization in tourism, highlighting that, although they can be forged as anti-capitalist alternatives, they end up being co-opted by a logic of maximizing profits, harming the conservation of common resources and the well-being of workers. The hopelessness of alternatives preached by capitalist realism in the context of work encounters barriers in experiences aligned with the solidarity economy, shared management of common resources, cooperatives and collective forms of work/equal distribution of income. Although there are significant experiences in the counterflow of mainstream tourism, they are not capable of revolutionizing the horizon of Amazonian community tourism.
Read full abstract