Capacitive Coupling Currents Research Articles

Monopolar Electrosurgery through Single-Port Laparoscopy: A Potential Hidden Hazard for Bowel Burns

Background Surveys indicate that up to 90% of general surgeons and gynecologists use monopolar radiofrequency during laparoscopy and 18% have experienced visceral burns. Monopolar electrosurgery compared with other energy sources is associated with unique characteristics and inherent risks and complications caused by inadvertent direct or capacitive coupling or insulation failure of instruments. These dangers become particularly important with the reemergence of single-port laparoscopy, which requires close proximity and crossing of multiple intraabdominal instruments outside the surgeon’s field of view. Study Objectives To determine the effects of monopolar electrosurgery on various tissues/organs during simulated single-port laparoscopic surgery in vitro and in vivo. Design Simulation in a dry laboratory with fresh sheep liver, pig bowel and bowel in an anesthetized dog (Canadian Classification II-3). Setting University-affiliated teaching hospital and animal facilities. Measurements and Main Results We used Valleylab Force 2 and FX electrosurgical generators at clinically used power outputs of 40 to 60 watts, and both high- and low-voltage (coagulation and cut) waveforms and commercially-available single-port devices. The effect on tissue was recorded by pictures and video camera and graded visually and histologically with hematoxylin and eosin stains. During activation of any standard monopolar laparoscopic instrument (scissors, coagulating electrode, etc), capacitive coupled currents resulting in visible tissue burn (blanching) caused by other adjacent cold instrument (graspers, etc) including metallic suction-irrigation cannulas and the laparoscope itself were noted. Histopathologic study confirmed transmural thermal damage extending to the mucosa of small bowel, even in the presence of mild serosa blanching. With prolonged activation of the electrosurgical generator, the capacitive coupled corona discharge burned the insulation and caused rapid insulation breakdown of the electrode instrument resulting in direct coupling (sparking, arcing) to adjacent cold instruments and more severe burning to the contacted tissue/organ. Conclusions During single-port laparoscopy and use of monopolar radiofrequency, the proximity and crossing of multiple instruments generate capacitive or direct coupled currents, which may cause visceral burns.

Intended and stray radiofrequency electrical currents during resectoscopic surgery

Study Objective. To test the hypothesis that electrical burns of the genital tract and urethral strictures after hysteroscopic endometrial ablation and transurethral prostatectomy, respectively, are related to capacitive coupling and/or stray currents induced by intact and defective electrodes and/or resectoscopes. Design. Basic in vitro measurements. Setting. Laboratory. Materials. Porcine muscle and liver, resectoscope, electrosurgical unit (ESU), and ESU analyzer. Intervention. We measured electrical coagulation and cutting currents of rollerball and loop electrodes and the external sheath of the resectoscope from 80 to 200 W through a resistance load of 200 and 250 ohms, using intact electrodes and conditions simulating potential insulation defects along the shaft of the electrodes. Measurements and Main Results. Approximately 20% to 25% of current was induced by capacitive coupling to the resectoscope sheath. Touching porcine muscle or liver with small areas of the sheath while the generator was activated resulted in superficial tissue burn. Surrounding large segments of the sheath with tissue did not result in visible burns, indicating that under normal conditions the sheath acts as a dispersive electrode. Defective insulation of distal segments of the electrodes resulted in 100% transfer of current to the sheath and caused extensive electrical burns of tissue in contact with the sheath. Conclusions. Capacitive coupled currents induced by intact resectoscopes and electrodes may cause thermal injury to surrounding tissue during prolonged resectoscopic surgery. Stray currents from defective insulation of the electrodes result in direct coupling of current to the telescope and sheath and cause extensive burns of surrounding tissues in contact with the sheath.

Wire-guided sphincterotomy.

Guidewire-assisted techniques have acquired an important role in endoscopic interventions in the pancreaticobiliary tree. The wire-guided sphincterotome allows the endoscopist to maintain direct access to the biliary tree before or after the sphincterotomy. It has the additional advantages of allowing for more expeditious placement of accessories and being useful in combined percutaneous-endoscopic procedures. There are two basic designs of wire-guided sphincterotomes. The single-channel model has a single lumen for both the cutting wire and guidewire and requires guidewire removal before the application of power. The double-channel model has two separate lumens for the guidewire and stainless steel cutting wire. In vitro data suggest that significant capacitive coupling currents (or short circuits) may occur on the standard Teflon-coated guidewire when used with a double lumen sphincterotome, resulting in electrosurgical burns. Thus, the manufacturers of the double-lumen models recommend removing the Teflon-coated wire before performing sphincterotomy. Although limited data in humans have been published, it appears that wire-guided sphincterotomy and standard sphincterotomy have similar complication rates. More safety information in humans is awaited.